Public Health Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Health Assessment Public Health Assessment Final Release LITTLE SCIOTO RIVER SITE MARION COUNTY, OHIO EPA FACILITY ID: OHN000509950 Prepared by the Ohio Department of Health JULY 11, 2012 Prepared under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Community Health Investigations Atlanta, Georgia 30333 THE ATSDR PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT: A NOTE OF EXPLANATION This Public Health Assessment was prepared by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) section 104 (i)(6) (42 U.S.C. 9604 (i)(6)), and in accordance with our implementing regulations (42 C.F.R. Part 90). In preparing this document, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner has collected relevant health data, environmental data, and community health concerns from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state and local health and environmental agencies, the community, and potentially responsible parties, where appropriate. In addition, this document has previously been provided to EPA and the affected states in an initial release, as required by CERCLA section 104 (i)(6)(H) for their information and review. The revised document was released for a 60-day public comment period. Subsequent to the public comment period, ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner addressed all public comments and revised or appended the document as appropriate. The public health assessment has now been reissued. This concludes the public health assessment process for this site, unless additional information is obtained by ATSDR’s Cooperative Agreement Partner which, in the agency’s opinion, indicates a need to revise or append the conclusions previously issued. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Additional copies of this report are available from: National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia (703) 605-6000 You May Contact ATSDR Toll Free at 1-800-CDC-INFO or Visit our Home Page at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov LITTLE SCIOTO RIVER SITE FINAL RELEASE PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT LITTLE SCIOTO RIVER SITE MARION COUNTY, OHIO EPA FACILITY ID: OHN000509950 Prepared by: The Health Assessment Section of the Ohio Department of Health Under a Cooperative Agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry . CONTENTS CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... 2 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 STATEMENT OF ISSUES ............................................................................................................ 6 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 6 Site Location ........................................................................................................................... 7 Demographics ......................................................................................................................... 7 Land Use ................................................................................................................................. 7 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY ............................................................................ 8 Geology ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Water and Groundwater Resource Use ....................................................................................... 8 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................... 9 SITE HISTORY .............................................................................................................................. 9 Baker Wood Creosoting Site ...................................................................................................... 9 Little Scioto River Site.............................................................................................................. 10 USEPA – Baker Wood Creosoting Site ................................................................................ 11 USEPA – Little Scioto River Site ......................................................................................... 11 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS ........................................................................................................... 13 Sediment ............................................................................................................................... 14 Food Chain (Fish) ................................................................................................................. 14 Groundwater ......................................................................................................................... 15 Surface Water........................................................................................................................ 15 CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN ............................................................................................ 15 Creosote .................................................................................................................................... 16 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) ............................................................................. 17 Metals ........................................................................................................................................ 18 DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................................... 18 COMMUNITY HEALTH CONCERNS ...................................................................................... 21 HEALTH OUTCOME DATA ...................................................................................................... 22 CHILD HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS ...................................................................................... 22 CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................................... 22 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 23 PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION PLAN ............................................................................................ 23 Completed Actions.................................................................................................................... 23 Ongoing Actions ....................................................................................................................... 24 Planned Actions ........................................................................................................................ 24 REPORT PREPARATION ........................................................................................................... 24 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 25 TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... 27 FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... 31 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 36 Appendix A. Estimates of Exposure Doses and Theoretical Cancer Risks .............................. 37 Appendix B. Response to Agency and Public Comments ........................................................ 46 Appendix C. Fact Sheets ........................................................................................................... 49 2 Little Scioto River Site SUMMARY ______________________________________________________________________________ Introduction The Little Scioto River site is a six and a half mile section of the Little Scioto River in Marion County, Ohio, just southwest of the City of Marion. The site begins slightly north of State Route 95 and extends to the Scioto River confluence south of Green Camp, Ohio. The sediment in this section of the river was grossly contaminated with coal-tar creosote from historic discharges from the Baker Wood Creosoting (Baker Wood Preserving Company) site (HAS, 2000). Creosote-contaminated sediments have been found in the Little Scioto River beginning downstream of Holland Road and extending to the mouth of the Little Scioto River at the confluence with the Scioto River, approximately six and a half miles to the south (Figures 1 and 2). Documents from the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) indicate that ODH asked the Baker Wood Creosoting Company to cease operations and discharges that were affecting water quality of the Little Scioto River in the 1940’s (ODH 1992). The Baker Wood Creosoting site was the subject of a time-critical removal action (TCRA) by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in 2000 and 2001. This removal action addressed remnant creosote wastes and grossly contaminated soil in and around the former wood treatment area. Contaminated
Recommended publications
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Water Quality Study of the Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries, 2010 Delaware, Franklin, Pickaway, and Union Counties
    Biological and Water Quality Study of the Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries, 2010 Delaware, Franklin, Pickaway, and Union Counties Ohio EPA Technical Report EAS/2012-12-12 Division of Surface Water Ecological Assessment Section November 21, 2012 DSW/EAS 2012-12-12 Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries TSD November 21, 2012 Biological and Water Quality Survey of the Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries 2010 Delaware, Franklin, Pickaway, and Union Counties November 21, 2012 Ohio EPA Technical Report/EAS 2012-12-12 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Central District Office Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Ecological Assessment Section 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, OH 43125 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 i DSW/EAS 2012-12-12 Middle Scioto River and Select Tributaries TSD November 21, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 12 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 13 RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 14 RESULTS .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Scioto Marshes of Ohio : a Study in the Geography of Onion Culture
    THE SCIOTO MARSHES OP OHIO: A STUDY IN THE GEOGRAPHY OF ONION CULTURE.1 CARL DUDLEY VARVEL, Ohio State University. THE AREA AS A UNIT. The Scioto Marsh, a bog soil province in the western part of Hardin County, is the largest of several such areas in the glaciated region of Ohio. The term "Marsh" is no longer used here in the technical sense, but is a "carry over" from the days before the area was drained. It extends over 16,000 acres2 and is believed to be one of the largest continuous onion producing areas in North America. Here the growing onion characterizes the summer landscape. The subject of its culture is foremost in local conversation. Onion cultivation leads successively to a condition of distinct wealth or relative poverty. It motivates an interstate migration of interesting laborers and furnishes the raison d'etre of three settlements within the local region. The greatest agricultural interest of most of the landowners is the onion. On an average about 3,500 acres of onions are harvested. In recent years the acreage has diminished largely as a result of several years of unfavorable climatic conditions which minimized the merchantable yield per acre. In 1915, an exceptional year, over 5,500 acres were harvested. In approaching the region from all directions one sees distinctly the terminal moraines and other glacial deposits. (Fig. 1.) The deposits at the north are part of the watershed between the Ohio River system and the Lake Erie drainage basin. The drumlins and kames at the west and south enclose the marsh and divide the waters of the Scioto Valley from those of the Miami Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological, Sediment and Water Quality Study of the Little Scioto River, Marion, Ohio
    State of Ohio Ecological Assessment Section Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Biological, Sediment and Water Quality Study of the Little Scioto River, Marion, Ohio Marion County, Ohio CmHn Benzo(a)pyrene April 8, 1994 P.O. Box 1049, 1800 WaterMark Dr., Columbus, Ohio 43266-0149 Disclaimer: This report was scanned into Adobe PDF format and may contain some typographical errors. Biological, Sediment and Water Quality Study of the Little Scioto River, Marion, Ohio Marion County April 8,8,1994 1994 OEPA Technical Report EAS/1994-4-3 prepared for State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Emergency and Remedial Response prepared by State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Ecological Assessment Section 1685 Westbelt Drive Columbus, Ohio 43228 David Altfater Bernie Counts DSW - EAS L. Scioto River TSD/Marion, OH April 8,1994 Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements .......................... 4 Introduction ............................... 5 Summary/ Conclusions ......................... 5 Recommendations Use Designation Status ...................... 9 Other ............................. 9 Methods. ............................ 12 Results and Discussions Sediment Chemistry ....................... 16 Pollutant Loadings ....................... 26 Surface Water Chemical Quality .................. 3 1 Physical Habitat for Aquatic Life .................. 33 Macroinvertebrate Community ................... 34 Fish Community ........................ 37 Trend Assessment ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Dublin Mobility Plan | Draft Implementation Plan City of Dublin, Ohio
    Dublin Mobility Plan | Draft Implementation Plan City of Dublin, Ohio Dublin Mobility Plan Phase II Final Report City of Dublin, Ohio June 2018 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i DUBLIN MOBILITY STUDY | PHASE II REPORT CITY OF DUBLIN, OH Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 2 Complete Streets...................................................................................................... 2 Why Enact a Complete Streets Policy? ..................................................................................................2 MORPC Complete Streets Toolkit............................................................................................................3 Going Above and Beyond MORPC’s Toolkit.........................................................................................5 Implementation & Next Steps ..................................................................................................................8 3 Shuttles and Circulators ............................................................................................ 9 Concept Overview......................................................................................................................................9 Support for a Dublin Circulator ............................................................................................................ 10 Conventional Circulator Case Studies.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843
    Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org $4.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Background 03 Trails and Settlements 03 Shelters and Dwellings 04 Clothing and Dress 07 Arts and Crafts 08 Religions 09 Medicine 10 Agriculture, Hunting, and Fishing 11 The Fur Trade 12 Five Major Tribes of Ohio 13 Adapting Each Other’s Ways 16 Removal of the American Indian 18 Ohio Historical Society Indian Sites 20 Ohio Historical Marker Sites 20 Timeline 32 Glossary 36 The Ohio Historical Society 1982 Velma Avenue Columbus, OH 43211 2 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In Ohio, the last of the prehistoric Indians, the Erie and the Fort Ancient people, were destroyed or driven away by the Iroquois about 1655. Some ethnologists believe the Shawnee descended from the Fort Ancient people. The Shawnees were wanderers, who lived in many places in the south. They became associated closely with the Delaware in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Able fighters, the Shawnees stubbornly resisted white pressures until the Treaty of Greene Ville in 1795. At the time of the arrival of the European explorers on the shores of the North American continent, the American Indians were living in a network of highly developed cultures. Each group lived in similar housing, wore similar clothing, ate similar food, and enjoyed similar tribal life. In the geographical northeastern part of North America, the principal American Indian tribes were: Abittibi, Abenaki, Algonquin, Beothuk, Cayuga, Chippewa, Delaware, Eastern Cree, Erie, Forest Potawatomi, Huron, Iroquois, Illinois, Kickapoo, Mohicans, Maliseet, Massachusetts, Menominee, Miami, Micmac, Mississauga, Mohawk, Montagnais, Munsee, Muskekowug, Nanticoke, Narragansett, Naskapi, Neutral, Nipissing, Ojibwa, Oneida, Onondaga, Ottawa, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Peoria, Pequot, Piankashaw, Prairie Potawatomi, Sauk-Fox, Seneca, Susquehanna, Swamp-Cree, Tuscarora, Winnebago, and Wyandot.
    [Show full text]
  • Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 Maopewa iati bi: Takai Tonqyayun Monyton "To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling": Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J. Emrick Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Emrick, Isaac J., "Maopewa iati bi: Takai Tonqyayun Monyton "To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling": Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 5543. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/5543 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maopewa iati bi: Takai Toñqyayuñ Monyton “To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling”: Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J. Emrick Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Tyler Boulware, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. Joseph Hodge, Ph.D. Michele Stephens, Ph.D. Department of History & Amy Hirshman, Ph.D. Department of Sociology and Anthropology Morgantown, West Virginia 2015 Keywords: Native Americans, Indian History, West Virginia History, Colonial North America, Diaspora, Environmental History, Archaeology Copyright 2015 Isaac J. Emrick ABSTRACT Maopewa iati bi: Takai Toñqyayuñ Monyton “To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling”: Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • Lick Run-Scioto River HUC 050600020403
    Pickaway County Park District 110 Island Rd Ste E, Circleville, OH 43113 Lick Run-Scioto River HUC 050600020403 9-Element Implementation Strategy Published by: Pickaway County Park District Coldwater Consulting, LLC. 46 West Columbus Street Final Draft P.O. Box 146 Galena, OH 43021 August 2020 Lick Run-Scioto River HUC 050600020403 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Page 1 SECTION ONE: Introduction Page 3 Section 1.1: Report Background Page 4 Section 1.2: Watershed Profile and History Page 4 Section 1.3 Public Participation Page 7 SECTION TWO: Watershed Characterization & Assessment Summary Page 9 Section 2.1.1: Physical and Natural Features Page 11 Geological Setting and Soils Page 11 General Habitat Conditions Page 12 Wetlands Page 13 Biology Page 15 Fish Page 15 Endangered Fish Species Page 16 Macroinvertebrates Page 17 Freshwater Mussels Page 18 Amphibians Page 19 Reptiles Page 21 Mammals Page 22 Birds Page 23 Invasive Species Page 26 Section 2.1.2: Land Use and Protection Page 26 Section 2.2: Summary of HUC-12 Biological Trends Page 30 Section 2.3: Summary of HUC-12 NPS Pollution Causes & Sources Page 31 Section 2.4: Additional Information for Determining Critical Areas Page 32 SECTION THREE: Critical Areas and Restoration Strategies Page 34 Section 3.1: Overview of Critical Areas Page 35 Critical Area #1: Lick Run Subwatershed Page 36 Critical Area #2: Canal Park Page 38 Section 3.2: Critical Area #1 Page 39 Detailed Characterization, Conditions, Goals and Objectives Page 39 Detailed Biological Conditions Page 40 Detailed Causes
    [Show full text]
  • IOWNER of PROPERTY NAME State of Ohio Honorable James Rhodes, Governor
    Form No. 10-300 (Rev. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOWTO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS NAME HISTORIC Ohio State House AND/OR COMMON Ohio State Capitol STREETS NUMBER Southeast corner of Broad § High Streets _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY, TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Columbus —.VICINITY OF 15th STATE CODE COUNTY CODE -^ ————— Ohio 18316 ——————————— 039 Franklin 049 HCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE _ DISTRICT ^.PUBLIC -^OCCUPIED _ AGRICULTURE _ MUSEUM X.BUILDINGIS) _PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL —PARK —STRUCTURE —BOTH —WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ ENTERTAINMENT —RELIGIOUS —OBJECT _IN PROCESS JCYES: RESTRICTED X-GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED — YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION _NO —MILITARY —OTHER: IOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME State of Ohio Honorable James Rhodes, Governor STREET & NUMBER CITY, TOWN STATE Columbus VICINITY OF Ohio 43215 LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS,ETC. Franklin Street Courthouse STREETS NUMBER South High Street CITY. TOWN STATE Columbus Ohio REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE State Survey, Ohio Historical Society DATE February 1967 —FEDERAL ^.STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Qhio Historical Society, 1982 Velma Avenue CITY, TOWN STATE Columbus Ohio DESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED ^UNALTERED ^.ORIGINAL SITE _XG0OD _RUINS _ALTERED _MOVED DATE_______ _FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBETHE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The original planners of the Ohio Capitol placed it in the center of a large square plot in central Columbus bounded by High, Broad, Third and State Streets. The large foundations measure 304 feet in length and 184 feet in width, and the entire structure cost $1,359,121.45 when complete.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Human Impacts on the Lower Olentangy River Watershed
    Friends of the Lower Olentangy Watershed March 2002 / edited 2003 6. Human Impacts on the Lower Olentangy River Watershed Cultural History Prehistoric Indians found the Olentangy watershed to be a fertile land for emerging agriculture as well as a source of rocks and flint needed for tool making. These early cultures -- Paleo Indian, Adena, Hopewell and Fort Ancient -- left behind artifacts, ceremonial and burial mounds, and traces of villages that still tantalize archaeologists. There is evidence that the Wyandotte Indians used the Olentangy Indian Caverns, located off Home Road in Delaware County, as a haven from the weather and from their enemies, the Delaware Indians. One of the large rooms contains "Council Rock," used by the Wyandotte for tribal ceremonies. Various artifacts found in the caverns indicate that the Indian Council Room was used by Wyandotte braves for making arrows and other stone implements until as late as 1810. Hundreds of these items were found when the caverns were opened and some are on display in the Museum. His own people killed “Leatherlips,” the chief of the Wyandotte, at the entrance to the cavern. Concrete stairways descend 55 feet to the maze of natural passages and rooms occupying three different levels. The second level contains "Indian Lover's Bench," "Battleship Rock" and "The Crystal Room." "Fat Man's Misery" is a narrow passage leading to "Cathedral Hall" and "The Bell Tower" room 105 feet below the earth's surface. Beyond are passages and rooms still unexplored. A fourth level where an underground river is flowing to the Olentangy River a half-mile east has been partially explored, but not opened to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Lands Book
    THE OFFICIAL OHIO LANDS BOOK Written by Dr. George W. Knepper THE OFFICIAL OHIO LANDS BOOK Written by Dr. George W. Knepper Cover art by Annette Salrin This book is a publication of The Auditor of State 88 East Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43216-1140 www.auditor.state.oh.us First paperback edition 2002 Printed in the United States of America i Table of Contents Auditor’s Message . .v The First Arrivals on Ohio Land Prehistoric Indians . .1 Historic Indians of Ohio . .2 Congress Creates the Public Domain . .7 Land Ordinance of 1785 . .9 Seven Ranges . .10 Northwest Ordinance . .13 Statehood for Ohio . .14 Getting Started as a State Boundaries of the New State . .18 Privately Conducted Original Surveys Virginia Military District . .19 Connecticut Western Reserve . .23 Firelands (Sufferers’ Land) . .25 Land Sales to Private Groups Ohio Company of Associates . .26 Donation Tract . .29 Symmes Purchase (Miami Purchase) . .30 Federal Land Offices and Sales in Ohio Harrison Land Act, May 10, 1800 . .35 United States Military District (USMD) . .39 Congress Lands Lands East of the Scioto River . .43 Lands West of the Miami River . .43 North of the Seven Ranges . .44 Congress Lands in Northwest Ohio South and East of the First Principal Meridian and Base Line . .45 North and East of the First Principal Meridian and Base Line . .45 iii Table of Contents Michigan Survey . .46 Federal Land Grants for Specific Purposes. Moravian Indian Grants . .48 French Grants . .49 Refugee Tract . .50 Zane’s Tract . .52 Dohrman Grant . .53 Other Grants to Individuals . .53 Federal Military Reservations Fort Washington .
    [Show full text]