DOCSLIB.ORG

Town of Chincoteague Comprehensive Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Town of Chincoteague Comprehensive Plan TOWN OF CHINCOTEAGUE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Chincoteague, Virginia Approved January 4, 2010 5 YEAR UPDATE Approved February 2, 2015 Chincoteague, Virginia Comprehensive Plan Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................. I-1 Plan Organization ..................................................................................................... I-2 Legal Framework ...................................................................................................... I-2 Acronyms…………………………………………………………………………...I-4 List of Reports/Studies……………………………………………………………. I-5 Chapter 1 Community Profile .............................................................................. 1-1 History of Chincoteague .......................................................................................... 1-1 Socio-Economic Characteristics ............................................................................. 1-3 Population ............................................................................................................ 1-4 Race...................................................................................................................... 1-4 Age and Sex ......................................................................................................... 1-4 Households ........................................................................................................... 1-4 Natural Features ...................................................................................................... 1-4 Climate ................................................................................................................. 1-4 Geology ................................................................................................................ 1-5 Physiography........................................................................................................ 1-5 Fast-land Soils ...................................................................................................... 1-6 Ground Water....................................................................................................... 1-6 Coastal Floodplain……………………………………………………………... 1-7 Tree Cover………………………………………………………………………1-7 Surface Water..................................................................................................... 1-10 Marsh Lands....................................................................................................... 1-10 Drainage ............................................................................................................. 1-10 Current Land Use .................................................................................................. 1-10 Vacant Land/Open Space .................................................................................. 1-13 Chapter 2 Goals and Objectives .......................................................................... 2-1 Comprehensive Plan Goals ..................................................................................... 2-1 Land Use Objectives……….…………………………………………………… 2-2 Economic Development Objectives ........................................................................ 2-2 Chincoteague, Virginia Comprehensive Plan 2010 i Table of Contents Transportation Objectives ...................................................................................... 2-3 Community Facilities and Services Objectives ..................................................... 2-3 Housing/Neighborhood Objectives ......................................................................... 2-4 Environmental Objectives……………………………………………………… 2-4 Chapter 3 Land Use Plan ....................................................................................... 3-1 Land Use Planning Areas ........................................................................................ 3-4 Single Family Residential .......................................................................................... 3-4 One & Two Family Residential ................................................................................. 3-5 Mixed Use Residential ............................................................................................... 3-5 Old Town Commercial .............................................................................................. 3-7 Resort Residential ...................................................................................................... 3-9 Neighborhood Commercial ........................................................................................ 3-9 Commercial Corridor ............................................................................................... 3-10 Resort Commercial .................................................................................................. 3-11 Public/Semi-Public .................................................................................................. 3-13 Park & Open Space .................................................................................................. 3-13 Resource Conservation ............................................................................................ 3-14 Agriculture ............................................................................................................... 3-18 Annexation Areas..................................................................................................... 3-18 Chapter 4 Economic Development ..................................................................... 4-1 Background .............................................................................................................. 4-1 Tourism & Recreation ............................................................................................. 4-1 Seafood & Aquaculture ........................................................................................... 4-8 Wallops Island ........................................................................................................ 4-10 Economic Development Opportunities ................................................................ 4-13 Implementation Strategies .................................................................................... 4-17 Chapter 5 Community Facilities ......................................................................... 5-1 Education .................................................................................................................. 5-1 Museum…………………………………………………………………………….5-2 Library ...................................................................................................................... 5-3 Theatre ...................................................................................................................... 5-4 Fire & Emergency Services ..................................................................................... 5-5 Police Protection....................................................................................................... 5-6 Public Works ............................................................................................................ 5-6 Stormwater Drainage .............................................................................................. 5-9 Flood Insurance ........................................................................................................ 5-9 Harbor .................................................................................................................... 5-10 Health Care............................................................................................................. 5-10 Recreational Facilities ........................................................................................... 5-11 Implementation Strategies……………………………………………………..…5-13 Chincoteague, Virginia Comprehensive Plan 2010 ii Table of Contents Chapter 6 Transportation ...................................................................................... 6-1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 6-1 Public Streets ............................................................................................................ 6-3 Improvement Projects ……………………………………… ………………..6-3 Implementation Strategies…………………………………………… ………….6-4 Private Roads……………………………………………………………………...6-5 Implementation Strategies ...................................................................................... 6-6 Chapter 7 Housing/Neighborhoods .................................................................... 7-1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 7-1 Building Codes ......................................................................................................... 7-2 Implementation Strategies ...................................................................................... 7-2 List of Exhibits and Maps Exhibit 1: Non-Tidal Wetlands .................................................................................. 1-8 Exhibit 2: Shoreline Conditions ................................................................................. 1-9 Exhibit 3: Soils ......................................................................................................... 1-11 Exhibit 4: Coastal Floodplain .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accomack County, Virginia Shoreline Inventory Report Methods and Guidelines
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 9-2016 Accomack County, Virginia Shoreline Inventory Report Methods and Guidelines Marcia Berman Virginia Institute of Marine Science Karinna Nunez Virginia Institute of Marine Science Sharon Killeen Virginia Institute of Marine Science Tamia Rudnicky Virginia Institute of Marine Science Julie Bradshaw Virginia Institute of Marine Science See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Berman, M., Nunez, K., Killeen, S., Rudnicky, T., Bradshaw, J., Angstadt, K., Tombleson, C., Duhring, K., Brown, K., Hendricks, J., Weiss, D., Hershner, C., & Comprehensive Coastal Inventory Program. (2016) Accomack County, Virginia Shoreline Inventory Report Methods and Guidelines. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering (SRAMSOE) No. 450. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. http://doi.org/10.21220/V58C79 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Marcia Berman, Karinna Nunez, Sharon Killeen, Tamia Rudnicky, Julie Bradshaw, Kory Angstadt, Christine Tombleson, Karen Duhring, Kallie Brown, Jessica Hendricks, David Weiss, Carl Hershner, and Comprehensive Coastal Inventory Program This report is available at W&M ScholarWorks: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports/61 Accomack County, Virginia Shoreline Inventory Report Methods and Guidelines Prepared By: Comprehensive Coastal Inventory Program Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Virginia September 2016 Special report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-AG-Environmental-Audit.Pdf
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER ONE: YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER AND DEEP CREEK LAKE .................. 4 I. Background .......................................................................................................... 4 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ........................................................... 9 III. The Youghiogheny River/Deep Creek Lake Audit, May 16, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned............................................................................................. 12 CHAPTER TWO: COASTAL BAYS ............................................................................. 15 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 15 II. Active Enforcement Efforts and Pending Matters ............................................. 17 III. The Coastal Bays Audit, July 12, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned .. 20 CHAPTER THREE: WYE RIVER ................................................................................. 24 I. Background ........................................................................................................ 24 II. Active Enforcement and Pending Matters ......................................................... 26 III. The Wye River Audit, October 10, 2012: What the Attorney General Learned 27 CHAPTER FOUR: POTOMAC RIVER NORTH BRANCH AND SAVAGE RIVER 31 I. Background .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Weather in Review: Assateague Island National Seashore
    National Park Service Northeast Coastal and Barrier Network U.S. Department of the Interior Inventory & Monitoring Division 2020 Weather in Review: Assateague Island National Seashore Weather and climate play significant roles in driving both physical and ecological processes. For example, the active processes that shape the North Atlantic coastline are largely the result of meteorological events such as wind- driven waves. For research and long-term ecological monitoring, weather and climate data provide the potential for correlations to be made with observed physical and ecological pattern data. This resource brief provides a summary of both historic and current (2020) weather data for Assateague Island National Seashore (ASIS), Maryland (MD). Because tide levels and wind can be significant for coastal parks, the annual water level and wind data are included. Temperature Overall, 2020 was the 2nd warmest year on record with an average temperature of 59.4 °F — 3.1 degrees above average (Figure 1). Spring nearly reached “above normal” temperatures, while summer, autumn, and winter seasons fell within “much above normal” temperatures. 2020 had the 2nd warmest winter on record. The warmest month was July with an average of 81 degrees — 4.7 degrees over the monthly average. Every month had higher than average temperatures, except May at 1.4 degrees below average (Table 1). Table1. Worcester County, Maryland average monthly, average annual, and departures from long- term average temperatures. Departures from average are based on a comparison of 2020 average temperatures to relevant averages from 1895-2019. Data are available at NOAA NCEI: Climate at a Glance (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/county/time-series/MD-047/tavg/all/12/2020-2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business with Wallops Flight Facility
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Doing Business with NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) in Virginia provides agile, low-cost flight and launch range ser- vices to meet government and commercial sector needs for accessing flight regimes worldwide from the Earth’s surface to the moon and beyond. As a multi-user facility with operational launch range, spaceport, and airfield assets, Wallops is well-positioned to meet ongoing and emerging needs in the science, aerospace, defense, and commercial industries. WALLOPS RANGE The Wallops Range supports many of the mission activities around WFF and abroad. Project managers utlize the support of range services to provide a broad array of technical and instrumentation services, such as radar, optical tracking, telemetry, meteorological, command and control, surveillance and recovery, financial analysis and engineering services to support scientific research and technology development. WALLOPS MOBILE ASSETS Wallops has semi-permanent downrange instrumentation as well as mobile instrumentation to include radar, telemetry, command/control, and data systems that can be transported to offsite and remote locations. Campaigns have been conducted from the semi-permanent locations in Bermuda and North Carolina, as well as from the Arctic and Antarctic regions, South America, Africa, Europe, Australia and even at sea, with our mobile systems. WFF personnel have extensive experience in planning and conducting downrange support and mobile campaigns, developing equipment and systems to support these operations. Downrange and mobile systems include the following: C-band radar, meteorology, optical tracking, orbital tracking, flight termination, telemetry, timing, surveillance, and recovery. Keith Thompson, Wallops Advanced Projects Office | 757-824-1680 www.nasa.gov/wallops MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL SPACEPORT Virginia’s Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at Wallops supports two launch facilities, one medium-lift liquid-fueled pad and a medium-lift solid propellant pad.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island
    GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Jane Thomas, IAN Image Library (www.ian.umces.edu/imagelibrary/) Andrew Roach ([email protected]) ESRI International Users Conference Assateague Island National Seashore National Parks Track, August 2006 Assateague Island GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia •Three Management GIS Enhances Agencies Restoration of Northern – National Assateague Park Service Island – Maryland Department of Natural Assateague Island Resources National Seashore –US Fish and Maryland Wildlife and Virginia Service •37 miles north/south Assateague Island GIS 1933 Hurricane: Enhances Restoration Creation of Ocean City of Northern Inlet Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia Assateague Island 1962 Nor’easter: Island-Wide Devastation GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia Natural Processes Interrupted GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia Mitigation Efforts GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern Assateague Island Assateague Island National Seashore Maryland and Virginia Jane Thomas, IAN Image Library (www.ian.umces.edu/imagelibrary/) Data GIS Enhances Restoration of Northern • Shorelines Assateague Island • Cross-Island Elevation Profiles •Lidar Assateague Island • Aerial Photography National Seashore •Bathymetry Maryland • Near-shore Profiles and Virginia
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Worcester County (PDF)
    Contents Worcester’s Original Locals ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Native American Names ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 From Colony To Free State ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 A Divided Land: Civil War .................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Storm Surges & Modern Times ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Our Historic Towns .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Berlin ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Ocean City .................................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Ocean Pines
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean City Harbor Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay Maryland Fact Sheet
    OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD FACT SHEET as of February 2019 AUTHORIZATION: The project was approved by the River and Harbor Act of August 1935 in accordance with Rivers and Harbors Committee Document No. 38, 72nd Congress and modified in Document No. 60. It was also modified in 1954. TYPE OF PROJECT: Navigation PROJECT PHASE: Operation and Maintenance CONGRESSIONAL INTEREST: Senators Van Hollen and Cardin (MD), Representatives Harris (MD-1) NON-FEDERAL SPONSOR: Worcester County, Maryland BACKGROUND: The location of the Ocean City inlet is on the far eastern boundary of Maryland along the Atlantic Coast. The project provides for an inlet channel 10 feet deep from the Atlantic Ocean through West Ocean City harbor. The inlet channel width varies from 100 to 200 feet. The inlet channel is protected by two stone jetties at the entrance from the Atlantic Ocean. The project also includes a channel 6 feet deep and with widths that vary from 100 to 150 feet in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Chincoteague Bay. The project also includes a channel 6 feet deep with widths that vary from 75 to 125 feet from the inlet into the Isle of Wight Bay. STATUS: The Ocean City inlet has a history of shoaling rapidly, especially near the entrance to the West Ocean City harbor. Limited maintenance dredging of the Ocean City inlet via one of the Corps’ special purpose dredges will be accomplished with fiscal year (FY) 2019 funds. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS – BALTIMORE DISTRICT 2 Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore MD 21201 https://www.nab.usace.army.mil page 1 of 5 BUDGET: Federal Funds Data Total Allocation for FY 2018 750,000 President Budget FY 20191 5,000 Allocation for FY 20192 255,000 President Budget FY 20201 TBD 1 The President typically sends the budget to Congress in February each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop
    Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop 29 – 31 March 2006 Berlin, MD, US FINAL REPORT Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Workshop 29 – 31 March 2006 Berlin, MD, US Final Report Conservation Breeding Specialist Group / SSC / IUCN Workshop organized by: Assateague Island National Seashore (ASIS); IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (CBSG). Workshop financial support provided by: National Park Service (NPS). Cover photos courtesy of Allison Turner, NPS (horses) and Kathy Traylor-Holzer, CBSG (habitat). Section divider photos courtesy of Allison Turner (sections 1, 5, 8, I), NPS; David Powell (3); and Kathy Traylor- Holzer (2, 4, 6, 7, II, III, IV). A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © Copyright CBSG 2006 Zimmerman, C., M. Sturm, J. Ballou, and K. Traylor-Holzer (eds.). 2006. Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment: Final Report. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, MN. Additional copies of Horses of Assateague Island Population and Habitat Viability Assessment Final Report can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC CBSG office ([email protected] or www.cbsg.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Project Mercury Fact Sheet
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 April 1996 FS-1996-04-29-LaRC ___________________________________________________________________________ Langley’s Role in Project Mercury Project Mercury Thirty-five years ago on May 5, 1961, Alan Shepard was propelled into space aboard the Mercury capsule Freedom 7. His 15-minute suborbital flight was part of Project Mercury, the United States’ first man-in-space program. The objectives of the Mer- cury program, eight unmanned flights and six manned flights from 1961 to 1963, were quite specific: To orbit a manned spacecraft around the Earth, investigate man’s ability to function in space, and to recover both man and spacecraft safely. Project Mercury included the first Earth orbital flight made by an American, John Glenn in February 1962. The five-year program was a modest first step. Shepard’s flight had been overshadowed by Russian Yuri Gagarin’s orbital mission just three weeks earlier. President Kennedy and the Congress were NASA Langley Research Center photo #59-8027 concerned that America catch up with the Soviets. Langley researchers conduct an impact study test of the Seizing the moment created by Shepard’s success, on Mercury capsule in the Back River in Hampton, Va. May 25, 1961, the President made his stirring chal- lenge to the nation –– that the United States commit Langley Research Center, established in 1917 itself to landing a man on the moon and returning as the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics him to Earth before the end of the decade. Apollo (NACA) Langley Memorial Aeronautical Labora- was to be a massive undertaking –– the nation’s tory, was the first U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chincoteague Discusses Possible Measures Ahead of July 1 Marijuana Legalization Abracadabra Or Fata Morgana — What Made the Sh
    CIRCULATION 10,000 Free April 23, 2021 Abracadabra or Fata Morgana — What Made the Ship Hover? Chincoteague Discusses Possible Measures Ahead of July 1 Marijuana Legalization By Carol Vaughn Chincoteague town council members at the April 15 meeting discussed im- plications for the town of the legaliza- tion of marijuana possession in Virgin- ia, which takes effect July 1. Other parts of the legislation, including retail sales, do not take effect until 2024. The legislation makes possession of up to an ounce of marijuana legal for people 21 and older starting July 1. Adults caught with more than an ounce but less than a pound face a $25 fine. On a recent trip across the bay, Shore native Ed Holland captured an image of a ship appearing to hover Vice Mayor Chris Bott said he re- above the water. He attributes the oddity to a phenomenon called fata morgana, a mirage caused by alter- ceived information from the Virginia nating layers of hot and cold air. Photo by Ed Holland. Municipal League about recent Gen- eral Assembly actions, including mar- ijuana legalization. Virginians Age 16 and Up Eligible for COVID-19 Vaccine “July 1, it’s on in the state of Virgin- By Stefanie Jackson Virginia adults are fully vaccinated. munity,” Northam said. ia,” Bott said, adding, “It’s a different All Virginia adults who want the Northam predicted every adult who “Vaccinations are the only way we world in these localities where this is COVID-19 vaccine are now eligible to wants the vaccine should be able to re- end this pandemic and get back to nor- on.
    [Show full text]
  • Assateague Island National Seashore
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Abbreviated Final General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Assateague Island National Seashore 2017 Cover Photo: Allen Sklar Final Abbreviated General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Assateague Island National Seashore 2017 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ABBREVIATED FINAL GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Assateague Island National Seashore, Maryland and Virginia Assateague Island National Seashore (the seashore), established in 1965, preserves the outstanding Mid-Atlantic coastal resources of Assateague Island and its adjacent waters and the natural processes upon which they depend. The seashore also provides high quality resource-compatible recreation experiences. To support these purposes, the National Park Service (NPS) has prepared a new general management plan (GMP) for the seashore, to replace the seashore’s existing GMP completed in 1982. The Draft General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (Draft GMP/EIS) was available for public and agency review from January 29, 2016 through May 1, 2016. The document presents and evaluates four alternatives for management of the seashore. Alternative 1. The NPS would continue to manage resources and visitor uses as it does today. The seashore enabling legislation and the existing General Management Plan (NPS 1982) would continue to guide seashore management. The NPS would manage seashore resources and visitor use as it does today, with no major change in direction. Alternative 2. Most visitors would enjoy traditional beach recreation concentrated within a high density developed area accessible by private vehicle. This alternative would likely require significant manipulation of the natural environment to protect facilities and infrastructure in the island developed area.
    [Show full text]