Nathaniel Weyl Papers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
U-M·I University Microfilms International a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road
Castro's Cuba and Stroessner's Paraguay: A comparison of the totalitarian/authoritarian taxonomy. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Sondrol, Paul Charles. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 11:08:31 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185284 INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photogr2,pb and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted.. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this -reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is inciuded in reduced form at the back of the book. -
H-Diplo Article Roundtable Review, Vol. X, No. 24
2009 h-diplo H-Diplo Article Roundtable Roundtable Editors: Thomas Maddux and Diane Labrosse Roundtable Web Editor: George Fujii Review Introduction by Thomas Maddux www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables Reviewers: Bruce Craig, Ronald Radosh, Katherine A.S. Volume X, No. 24 (2009) Sibley, G. Edward White 17 July 2009 Response by John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr Journal of Cold War Studies 11.3 (Summer 2009) Special Issue: Soviet Espoinage in the United States during the Stalin Era (with articles by John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr; Eduard Mark; Gregg Herken; Steven T. Usdin; Max Holland; and John F. Fox, Jr.) http://www.mitpressjournals.org/toc/jcws/11/3 Stable URL: http://www.h-net.org/~diplo/roundtables/PDF/Roundtable-X-24.pdf Contents Introduction by Thomas Maddux, California State University, Northridge.............................. 2 Review by Bruce Craig, University of Prince Edward Island ..................................................... 8 Review by Ronald Radosh, Emeritus, City University of New York ........................................ 16 Review by Katherine A.S. Sibley, St. Josephs University ......................................................... 18 Review by G. Edward White, University of Virginia School of Law ........................................ 23 Author’s Response by John Earl Haynes, Library of Congress, and Harvey Klehr, Emory University ................................................................................................................................ 27 Copyright © 2009 H-Net: Humanities and Social Sciences Online. H-Net permits the redistribution and reprinting of this work for non-profit, educational purposes, with full and accurate attribution to the author(s), web location, date of publication, H-Diplo, and H-Net: Humanities & Social Sciences Online. For other uses, contact the H-Diplo editorial staff at [email protected]. H-Diplo Roundtable Reviews, Vol. -
Constitutional History, Social Science, and Brown V. Board of Education 1954–1964
CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY, SOCIAL SCIENCE, AND BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION 1954–1964 RAYMOND WOLTERS PART II: THE CONTINUING CONTROVERSY he segregationists’ counterattack on the Brown ruling and its historical and social science underpinnings was not limited to courtroom battles. Ever since Brown they Thad also challenged the prevailing public opinion about school desegregation. After Stell v. Savannah they redoubled these efforts. Henry E. Garrett and Wesley Critz George often wrote for general audiences, and two especially gifted writers, James J. Kilpatrick and Carleton Putnam, also came to the defense of segregation. From the moment of the Brown decision, Kilpatrick regarded desegregation as “jurisprudence gone mad.” He thought the Supreme Court had ignored eight decades of legal precedents and willfully disregarded the original un- derstanding of the Fourteenth Amendment. Since the justices had interpreted the Constitution “to suit their own gauzy concepts of sociology,” Kilpatrick recommended that the South use every possible legal means to circumvent desegregation. “Let us pledge ourselves to litigate this thing for fifty years,” he wrote. “If one remedial law is ruled invalid, then let us try another; and if the second is ruled invalid, then let us enact a third…If it be said now that the South is flouting the law, let it be said to the high court, You taught us how.”1 In an extraordinary series of editorials published in the Richmond News Leader in 1955, Kilpatrick resurrected the Jeffersonian idea of interposition as a way to stop abuses of federal power. When a Federalist Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, in apparent disregard of states’ rights and of the First Amendment’s prohibition of laws that abridged freedom of speech, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson prepared protests known as the Virginia and Kentucky Resolves. -
Preface My Years with the Pioneer Fund by Harry F. Weyher President
Preface My Years with the Pioneer Fund by Harry F. Weyher President, The Pioneer Fund On 22 November 1994 ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings was replete with somber voices speaking of a small penis being a "sign of superior intelligence," "eradicating inferior people," arresting blacks solely because of skin color, race superiority, and mentally ill Jews. This voice-over was spiced with references to Hitler and scenes of emaciated victims in Nazi death camps.1 I watched this broadcast with more than usual interest, because I was president of the foundation which was the subject of the broadcast, the Pioneer Fund. Fearing such tabloid treatment, I had refused repeated invitations from ABC to appear on tape for the program.2 My fears were justified. What I saw was a grotesque distortion, akin to what one used to see in fun house mirrors. ii The Science of Human Diversity A History of the Pioneer Fund The ABC broadcast was one of an endless series of attacks on Pioneer and the scientists whom it has funded, dating back almost 50 years, most often by making baseless charges of "Nazism" or "racism," thus sometimes inciting student unrest or faculty reaction. The following also has happened to Pioneer and these scientists: One scientist had to be accompanied by an armed guard on his own campus, as well as guarded in his home. Another scientist was required by the university to teach his classes by closed circuit television, supposedly in order to prevent a riot breaking out in his class. Several scientists had university and other speaking engagements canceled or interrupted by gangs of students or outside toughs. -
Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001
Technical Report 02-5 July 2002 Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001 Katherine L. Herbig Martin F. Wiskoff TRW Systems Released by James A. Riedel Director Defense Personnel Security Research Center 99 Pacific Street, Building 455-E Monterey, CA 93940-2497 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704- 0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE (DDMMYYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From – To) July 2002 Technical 1947 - 2001 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER Espionage Against the United States by American Citizens 1947-2001 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER Katherine L. Herbig, Ph.D. Martin F. Wiskoff, Ph.D. 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. -
Security and Freedom-That Is Today’S Great Challenge
SECURITYand FREEDOM the GREAT CHALLENGE Thirtieth Annual Report of the American Civil Liberties Union Dedicated to ROGER N. BALDWIN Esecntive Director 1920-1910 JOHN HAYNES HOLMES Chairman of the Board of Directors 1940- 19 T 0 EDWARD A. ROSS Chairman of the National Committee 1940-1950 with Respect, Gratitude and Affection TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION--“A FREE NATION OF FREE PEOPLE” 5 SECURITY AND CIVIL LIBERTIES .,.. 10 A. GENERAL ANTI-SEDITION LBGISLAI‘IVE EFFORTS 10 1. The McCarran Act ,. .,, 10 2. “Little McCarran” Acts 3. The Smith Act .,. ,.,..... ,.. :i 4. House Un-American Activities Committee ,........ .,............ 5. House Lobbying Committee ::, 6. State Investigations 17 B. SKIJRITY AND LOYAL’IY AMONG EMPLOYEES 17 1. Federal Program 2. The McCarthy Charges ::, 3. State and Local Programs; 4. Private Programs’ 22 C. OTHER THREATS TO FREEDOM OF OPINION 25 1. General Free Speech .,,....,,..,.... 2. Radio and Movies ., :: 3. Magazines and Books ..,. .._........... 29 4. Schools and Colleges .._.......... 5. Labor Unions .._...... 6. Aliens .._ .,..... .,.. .._ 7. Conscientious Objection __....,.._.........._.,..,,.......,,........................... D. OTHER THREATS TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW 1. Wiretapping ..,,...., .,..... 2. Bail Cases 3. Picketing of Courts 4. Grand Juries 38 THE FIRST FREEDOM .._............... 39 A. GENERAL FREE EXPRESSION .._.............................. B. LABOR ,,., . .. .. .. .. .. :; C. CENSORSHIP .,,,,.. ,.,... 40 D. RELIGION .,.. 44 DUE PROCESS OF LAW ,. 46 A. WIRETAPPING ,, ., .,,.... ..,...,_ .,, .,... .., .,.. 46 B. FAIR TRIAL .., 48 C. PUNISHMENT ,,... ,, 49 EQUALITY 49 A. MINORITIES ..~... 50 B. STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTIVITIES .._......... .._...... 53 1. Employment and Education .._ 2. Housing and Public Accommodations :; 3. Voting and Fair Trial .,.... ,... 55 C. PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS 56 1. Social 56 2. -
Honoring Racism: the Professional Life and Reputation of Stanley D
1 Honoring Racism: The Professional Life and Reputation of Stanley D. Porteus David E. Stannard In the Spring of 1998, the University of Hawai’i (UH) Board of Regents (BOR) voted to remove the name of former UH Professor Stanley D. Porteus from its place of honor on the Mānoa campus’ Social Science Building. This was the culmination of more than two decades of on-again, off-again activism on the part of UH students and faculty – spearheaded in the end by the 1997-98 Associated Students of the University of Hawai’i (ASUH). It was all done rather quietly. In the Fall of 1997, following an overwhelmingly supported ASUH resolution on the matter, UH President Kenneth Mortimer directed that a faculty-student committee be appointed to study Porteus’ work and to reconsider the appropriateness of honoring him with a campus building in his name. That committee’s report was issued in March of 1998. It recommended removing Porteus’ name from the Social Science Building, but it carefully avoided any detailed discussion of his work, and thus it provided no in-depth rationale for the serious action it advocated. Following in this line, Vice President for Academic Affairs Dean Smith conveyed the committee’s report to the Board of Regents with his assent, but also with an accompanying brief introduction that denied that Porteus’ work was – as ASUH and many scholars had long claimed – virulently racist and violent in its policy implications. Going one better than the substantially non-committal faculty-student committee, the Vice President’s remarks actually served to deny and undermine the recommendation with which he was concurring – the recommendation that the Regents should take the extraordinary step of removing Porteus’ name from the Social Science Building after two decades of its presence there. -
Inventory for Congressional Period Collection
Congressional Period. Work File. – House Committee on Un-American Activities. (PPS 205) (Materials in bold type is available for research) [Boxes 1-10 covered under Congressional Collection Finding Aid] Box 11 : Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – Index. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, July 22 – Abraham Brothman. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, July 31 – FBI agent. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, July 31 – Harry Gold. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, Nov. 24 – Louis Budenz. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, Nov. 25 – FBI agent. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, Nov. 25 – Julius J. Joseph. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, Dec. 2 – Norman Bursler. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, Dec. 3 – FBI agent. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1947, Dec. 3 – Mary Price. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Jan. 20 – FBI agent. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Jan. 20 – Solomon Adler. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Feb. 10 – FBI agent. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Feb. 10 – FBI agent. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Mar. 16. – FBI agent. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Mar. 16 – Alger Hiss. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Mar. 23 – FBI agent. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Mar. 24-25 – Harry Dexter White. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Mar. 30 – Elizabeth Bentley. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Mar. 31-Apr. 1 – Lement Harris. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Apr. 6 – Elizabeth Bentley. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Apr. 7 – Maurice Joseph Berg. Hiss case: Grand Jury testimony – 1948, Apr. -
TOYLAND Ti.<JW.IIAI.4 Cou Chinese Communists Give Ground Before
?AGE W E.-TTl Manrtfratpr lEttnting 1 | m U l Until 9 0 *clock Tonight for Xmas Shoppe^ Avaraga Daily Nat.Praaa Run fbe Hia Montk «C NeveaMw. 18M 9 , 6 3 5 Mambar ^ * 0 AoM t Bm w m o f f « ManeheMter^4 CUy of VlUage Charm VOL. LXVin., NO. $1 (CInaeiaad Advarttalag an Page 1#) MANCHESTER, CONN„ SATURDAY, DECE&1BER 11, 1948 (TWELVE P.\GES) PRICE FOUR o n m Production Trends Death Blast R i^ Power Plant News Tidbits Chinese Communists Called . Prom (A*) W irts Strong as Buying Little Tojo Sbiaagawe, bora when Jap war criminal was popu lar national figure, gets hia name Give Ground Before ohaaged... Film Urtter Lester Cole, who refused to tell House Moving Backward committee whether he was Oom- Sylo-Cowns munlat, says he is "loyal Ameri can" as be sues Metro-Gridwyn- Mayor for reinstatement to his Spirited Relief Unit Of a&nforlxad Siiedena flannelette. Bngiiiess Cdntinnes at| Convenient Taint* writing Job ... Beatrice Korla, With perky walat and yoke ruffles. Saves Cash la Safe ChfeagO, who agreed to g o back to ❖ Free action sleeve, assorted colors. Odds With Itself I her husband on a “ klseleas” heals, This Week; All Major, Chcago, Dec. 11.—(F)—Irvin is back in court seeking divorce Montraal Woman Picks Nationalist High Com- Kapper, 49, was calm as three again because her huebaad tried la Alliance Talks lines of Heavy In-j gunmen took $778 from his e ber...Grand Dragon tells Br c of Ripe Strawb«Ties jnanfl Predicts Cohmoi 'dostry Operate at| cash register in his shoe store meeting o f 800 new K feaeoea in Will Make Omtact yesterday. -
Institute of Pacific Relations. Report
f t I S. Res. 366, Rept. No. 2050. (Jun. 27, 1952). Institute of Pacific Relations, Report, Patrick A. McCarran (NV), chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, Hrgs. Jul. 25, 1951-Jun. 20, 1952, 81st Cong., 2d sess., GPO. ] s^^^^™ ^^i.?.sri {sraSio [ Source: https://ia800906.us.archive.org/2/items/instituteofpacif1952unit/ instituteofpacif1952unit.pd"a f ] INSTITUTE OF PACIFIC RELATIONS REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY EIGHTY-SECOND CONGRESS SECOND SESSION PURSUANT TO S. Res. 366 (81st Congress) — A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE INTERNAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES HEARINGS HELD JULY 25, 1951-JUNE 20, 1952 BY THE INTERNAL SECURITY SUBCOMMITTEE July 2 (legislative day June 27), 1952.—Ordered to be printed UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 21705 WASHINGTON : 1952 t? <?-'> -!*TTT .Kb M.!335.4AIS 4 Given By TT Q QTyPT nT7 HP t S^ " *''^-53r,4 I6f / U. S. SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENT AUG 11 1952 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PAT McCARRAN, Nevada, Chairman HARLEY M. KILGORE, West Virginia ALEXANDER WILEY, Wisconsin JAMES O. EASTLAND, Mississippi WILLIAM LANGER, Nortli Dakota WARREN G. MAGNUSON, Washington HOMER FERGUSON, Michigan HERBERT R. O'CONOR, Maryland WILLIAM E. JENNER, Indiana ESTES KEFAUVER, Tennessee ARTHUR V. WATKINS, Utah WILLIS SMITH, North Carolina ROBERT C. HENDRICKSON, New Jersey J. G. SorRwiNE, Counsel Internal Security Subcommittee PAT McCARRAN, Nevada, Chairman JAMES O. EASTLAND, Mississippi HOMER FERGUSON, Michigan HERBERT R. O'CONOR, Maryland WILLIAM E. JENNER, Indiana WILLIS SMITH, North Carolina ARTHUR V. WATKINS, Utah Robert Morris, Special Counsel Benjamin' Mandel, Director of Research Subcommittee Investigating the Institute of Pacific Relations JAMES O. EASTLAND, Mississippi, Chairman PAT McCARRAN, Nevada HOMER FERGUSON, Michigan II CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 What is IPR? 3 Effect of the Inscitute of Pacific Relations on United States public opinion. -
Book Reviews
BOOK REVIEWS Kati Marton, True Believer: Stalin’s Last American Spy.NewYork:Simon&Schuster, 2016. 289 pp. $27.00. Reviewed by R. Bruce Craig, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton True Believer chronicles the life and times of Cold War–era espionage agent Noel Field and, to a lesser extent, the life of his wife, Herta, both of whom remained steadfast believers in the ideals and promises of Soviet-style Communism even when it had fallen out of fashion. In telling their story, Kati Marton paints a vivid and somewhat sympathetic portrait of the couple. She draws in a cast of characters, including Paul and Hede Massing, Alger Hiss, Lawrence Duggan, J. Peters (aka Sandor Goldberger), Allen Dulles, “Wild Bill” Donovan, and Iosif Stalin. A major strength of the book is Marton’s success in integrating these characters and their beliefs into the context of the times. The result is not only a balanced biography of Noel Field but also a nuanced account of espionage during the Red Decade and early Cold War era. Marton is uniquely qualified to tell this story. Like Field, her father was a political prisoner of the Hungarian Communists who for a time occupied the same cell with Field. Later, after both men were released from prison, Marton’s parents interviewed Noel and Herta, earning the distinction of being the only Western journalists ever to do so. Marton came to possess her parent’s notes of that interview, which, when combined with private correspondence from cooperating surviving members of the Field family, enabled her to flesh out the story of Noel Field, assessing his motives and adeptly placing him in his era. -
( November 20, 1945-0Ctober 16, 1946 the Nazi War Crimes Trials
( November 20, 1945-0ctober 16, 1946 The Nazi War Crimes Trials 1. Nuremberg, Germany: A) International Tribunal. 2. Nazis indicted are: A) Hermann Goering: I. Cynical. II. HAS cured his prescription drug habit. B) .Joachim von Ribbentrop: I. Has NO moral integrityl II. Sloppy physical habitsl ( III. Sloppy mental habits! C) Rudolf Hess: I. Amnesiac. II. Paranoid. III. Delusional about food being poisoned. IV. Hysterical personality. V. Suicidal. D) Ernst Kaltenbrunner. E) Alfred Rosenberg. F) Hans Frank: I. Remorseful. II. Surly. III. Evasive. IV. Suicidal. V. Converts to Catholicism. G) Wilhelm Frick. H) Fritz Sauckel. I) Albert Speer: I. Sincere feeling of Nazi guilt• .J) Hjalmar Schacht: I. Egotistical. L) Walter Funk. M) Franz von Papen: I. Polite. II. Always knew Hitler was a liar. III. Always knew Hitler was a betrayer. N) Constantin von Neurath. 0) Baldur von Schirach: ( I. Remorseful. II. Resigned to his death. P) Arthur Seyss-Inquart. Q) .Julius Streicher: I. Lewd. II. Perverted. III. Low IQ. IV. Hates .Jews!!!!! R) Wilhelm Keitel: I. No backbone! II. Can't believe a General could be held responsible for the actions of his men! S) General Alfred .Jodi. T) Admiral Karl Doenitz. ( U) Hans Fritzsche. \ V) Admiral Erich Raeder. ***21 are placed on trianlill 3. August 31, 1946: A) Defendants give their final speeches. 4. October 1, 1946: A) Verdicts: I. Schacht - von Papen - and Fritzsche: (1) Not guiltyl II. Doenitz: (1) 10 yearsl III. von Neurath: ( (1) 15 yearsl IV. von Schirach - and Speer: (1) 20 yearsl V. Hess - Funk - and Raeder: (1) Lifel VI. Goering - Ribbentrop - Keitel- Frank Kaltenbrunner - Rosenberg - Streicher - Sauckel - .Jodi - Seyss-Inquart - and Frick: (1) Death by hanginglll **********11 are to diet 5.