DOCSLIB.ORG

China Eyes Its Next Prize – the Mekong

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
China Eyes Its Next Prize – the Mekong See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327871725 China eyes its next prize -- The Mekong Research · June 2018 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34318.82241 CITATION READS 1 93 1 author: Elliot Brennan Institute for Security and Development Policy 25 PUBLICATIONS 21 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Conflict Management in the Indo-Pacific (Independent) View project Vietnam Rural Reform View project All content following this page was uploaded by Elliot Brennan on 25 September 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. CHINA | SOUTHEAST ASIA China eyes its next prize – the Mekong Sesan 2 dam in Stung Treng, Cambodia (Photo: Jason South via Getty) BY Elliot Brennan @elliotbrennan 5 June 2018 15:00 AEDT Beijing’s islands-building in the South China Sea and their militarisation, replete with surface-to- air missiles, is near complete. With guile, threat, and coercion, China can now seize control of one of the main transport arteries of Southeast Asia, making a mockery of international laws and norms. But there is another prize in Beijing’s sights, an artery that runs straight through mainland Southeast Asia. The mighty Mekong River, which starts in China (known there as Lancang), and connects Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia, is a crucial lifeline that nourishes some 60 million people along its banks. Control of both the South China Sea and Mekong River will strategically sandwich mainland Southeast Asia. Indeed, Beijing’s control of Southeast Asian rivers looks set to be the other half of its “salami slicing” strategy in the region. Famine is more terrible than the sword Famine is more terrible than the sword Controlling the Mekong River’s flow with dams along the waterway ultimately means controlling access to food, and therefore the livelihoods of tens of millions of people in downstream riparian communities. Of the hydroelectricity dams on the Mekong, the vast majority of currently installed capacity (megawatts) is in China, accounting for more than 15,000 MW. This includes a half-dozen mega-dams over 1000 MW, including Nuozhadu dam which churns out 5850 MW. Together these dams can hold back 23 billion cubic metres of water, or 27% of the river’s annual flow between China and Thailand. Other dams in the lower Mekong are piddling by comparison, with generating capacity in the tens or low hundreds of MW. The bottom line: Chinese dams can now regulate the Mekong’s flow. Theun Hinboun hydroelectric dam in Central Laos (Photo: Elliot Brennan) This is even more pronounced in the dry season when the Tibetan Plateau contributes between 40 and 70% of the river’s flow. The impact on food and livelihoods is dramatic now, but could soon be far worse if 11 proposed mega-dams, half with some Chinese involvement, go ahead. A recent UNESCO and Stockholm Environment Institute report suggests sediment flows in the river could reduce by up to 94% if the proposed dams go ahead, significantly afecting fish catches and overall river health. This will directly afect downstream riparian communities. overall river health. This will directly afect downstream riparian communities. More worryingly, the raison d’être of the proposed dams and of-cited promise of a crucial electricity boost for the economies of the lower Mekong has been found to be misguided. Many of the proposed lower Mekong dams will export their energy to China, and others will have direct negative impacts on the economy. It is projected that over the next 50 years, the cost for the lower Mekong basin economy will be a net negative $7.3 billion, with Vietnam and Cambodia the worst of. The social costs could be just as astronomical. Dams as dominoes During a recent trip to Laos, I encountered concerns about Chinese dams being used as strategic levers, producing unannounced upstream releases of water that impact not only communities but also new downstream dams. In such a case, the downstream dams would need to immediately release water through the spillway, at best resulting in the loss of valuable generating capacity, potentially impacting electricity supply, and at worst flooding downstream villages or damaging the integrity of the dam wall. Already many of the dams on the tributaries of the Mekong are uninformed of upstream releases in the Mekong proper, potentially afecting their own release of water by creating a flood surge when the released waters converge. One of the operators of a joint venture dam in Laos confided that there was ofen little or no forewarning when water from a Chinese-built upstream dam was released. Nam Ngum 1 dam in Laos with expansion project in background (Photo: Elliot Brennan) Many of these dams are Southeast Asian state–owned or involve European firms, which could further complicate matters if an incident occurred. Indeed, the release of unscheduled upstream water by Chinese-owned dams could be used to engineer a public protest against the downstream water by Chinese-owned dams could be used to engineer a public protest against the downstream dam’s parent company. That is concerning because it turns dams into dominoes, with China at first fall. Dams without water, or without suficient water in their reservoirs, also disrupt economies as they are unable to supply expected electricity output. With upstream Chinese firms controlling the Mekong’s flow, it has sufered drought-like conditions attributed to the irregular flow of the river itself. Nam Ngum 1 hydroelectric dam in Laos (Photo: Elliot Brennan) Salinisation of the Mekong at its mouth in Vietnam is one example; soil erosion across the river system is another. It’s a huge problem for those that rely on the river – the Mekong Delta in Vietnam alone produces 40% of the country’s rice and much of the basin’s protein. All hail Yu Shi A much-overlooked and further source of strength in China’s control of the river system, as well as river systems across the subcontinent, is the cloud seeding project named Tianhe. The project’s stated objective is to increase rainfall by 10 billion cubic metres – 7% of China’s current consumption – over the Tibetan Plateau that feeds into key transboundary rivers, including the Mekong, Brahmaputra, Indus, and Salween. The project, part of the broader artificial weather project, would seed rain to fall over the plateau and into the catchments of these rivers. This water would then be regulated by Chinese dams (see this comprehensive map), or could be redirected domestically. But as Carnegie Council’s Janos Pasztor notes, the seeding doesn’t produce rain, “it makes it happen somewhere, which means that it will not happen somewhere else”. Controlling the weather and ensuring rain falls within China is the next step to controlling water flows to neighbouring countries. In part, this is worrying because China’s current record of natural resource management is far from stellar: some 70% of rivers and lakes in China are polluted. Moreover, the potential control of rainfall creates further problems. In good times it encourages countries to build electricity-generating dams, and in bad could mean downstream drought and a full-scale weaponisation of water. (An excellent anecdote on this is here). Blowing up islands Dams and rainfall are only one part of the equation. In contrast with its islands-building in the South China Sea, China has embarked on a “Mekong River Navigation Channel Improvement Project” that involves blasting islets, rapids, and rocks in the Mekong River to create a shipping lane through the heart of mainland Southeast Asia to Laos. The environmental and social damages, as well as a new highway for the import of Chinese products, are expected to have a net negative impact on Southeast Asian economies. As such, Bangkok is yet to yield to the project on the Thai segment of the river. Given the current assertiveness of Beijing’s foreign policy, in the event of war this inland maritime highway would become a strategic nightmare. This, alongside the negative economic outlook for the region, provides worrying prospects for future sovereignty in mainland Southeast Asia. Chinese tributaries of the Mekong Unsurprisingly, Southeast Asian states and other concerned parties have long tried to bring China to the table to establish appropriate rules for cooperation. The Mekong River Commission, established in 1995, aimed to do just that. Beijing dragged its feet, frustrating the cooperative body where it could. In 2016, in line with Beijing’s current my-way-or- the-highway style of diplomacy, it launched its own group. The Lancang-Mekong Cooperation has bullied states into working together. As a carrot for Southeast Asian states’ participation in the first LMC in March 2016, Beijing released water to drought-stricken downstream countries. The threat was implicit: China controls the river. This notion is the antecedent to conflict, not cooperation. These concerns over the Mekong and other rivers, and their place in China’s geopolitical strategy, are not new (see some excellent long-form reading here, here, and here). But today we seem to be are not new (see some excellent long-form reading here, here, and here). But today we seem to be at a tipping point, to which the region must respond. Southeast Asian states, which are all set to lose, must find greater unity among themselves. European partners in Mekong River dams should explore alternative projects to supply energy. Others, such as Australia, must move away from the cavalier “Xi’ll be right mate” attitude, and with a concert of fair-minded friends support new energy alternatives and sustainability initiatives to boost resilience in mainland Southeast Asia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) Contents in Middle and Lower Reaches of Lancang River: Related to Water Environments and Dams
    Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2017, 9, 1132-1144 http://www.scirp.org/journal/jwarp ISSN Online: 1945-3108 ISSN Print: 1945-3094 Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) Contents in Middle and Lower Reaches of Lancang River: Related to Water Environments and Dams Jinxia Lu, Kaidao Fu*, Mingyue Li, Daxing Li, Di Li, Chao Wang, Wenhui Yang Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Asian International Rivers Center, Yunnan University, Kunming, China How to cite this paper: Lu, J.X., Fu, K.D., Abstract Li, M.Y., Li, D.X., Li, D., Wang, C. and Yang, W.H. (2017) Dissolved Inorganic Carbon Carbon cycle is one of the focuses of climate change, river carbon is an im- (DIC) Contents in Middle and Lower portant part, while dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) has a high proportion of Reaches of Lancang River: Related to Water river carbon flux. In this study, we did the research on the Lancang River, an Environments and Dams. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 9, 1132-1144. important international river in the southwest of China. Water samples were https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.910074 obtained from 16 sections of the middle and lower reaches of the Lancang River in 2016 (11 months), then we monitored some water quality indicators Received: August 8, 2017 and DIC content, finally analyzed the temporal-spatial distribution characte- Accepted: September 15, 2017 Published: September 18, 2017 ristics of DIC and the relationship between DIC content and water environ- ment factors. The results showed that: (1) DIC contents in the middle and Copyright © 2017 by authors and lower reaches of the Lancang River varied from 1.1840 mmol/L to 3.1440 Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multiplication of Dams Reduces the Mekong's Flow
    Sentinel Vision EVT-767 The multiplication of dams reduces the Mekong's flow 19 November 2020 Sentinel-1 CSAR IW acquired on 06 October 2014 from 22:45:02 to 22:45:31 UTC ... Se ntinel-1 CSAR IW acquired on 29 August 2020 from 11:21:38 to 11:24:33 UTC Sentinel-1 CSAR IW acquired on 04 October 2020 from 22:44:48 to 22:45:13 UTC Author(s): Sentinel Vision team, VisioTerra, France - [email protected] 3D Layerstack Keyword(s): River, hydrology, dam, biodiversity, hydropower, green energies, sediments, fishing, agriculture, salinity, China, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam Fig. 1 - S1 (29.08.2020 - 03.09.2020) - Chinese dams built on the Mekong river. 2D view Fig. 2 - S1 (20.08.2015) - Before the construction of Dahuaqiao dam in the Yunnan province of China. 3D view / The Mekong River Commission For Sustainable Development describes the Mekong river as "one of the world’s great rivers. Covering a distance of nearly 5,000 km from its source on the Tibetan Plateau in China to the Mekong Delta, the river flows through six countries: China, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam." Fig. 3 - S1 (29.08.2020) - Five years later, view after the building of Dahuaqiao dam. 3D view "The basin is home to one of the richest areas of biodiversity in the world, with more than 20,000 plant species and 850 fish species discovered to date. An estimated 80% of the nearly 65 million people living in the Lower Mekong River Basin depend on the river and its rich natural resources for their livelihoods, making sustainable development crucial for the environment and communities living in the basin." Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Death of the Mekong, River of Buddhism Khanh T. Tran, AMI
    Death of the Mekong, River of Buddhism Khanh T. Tran, AMI Environmental, USA Introduction From its origin in the high plateau of Tibet, the Mekong River is 4500 km long and the 12th longest river in the world, flowing through six countries that include China, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Through its long course, the river is known as Lancang in China, Mekong in Myanmar, Laos and Thailand, and finally as River of Nine Dragons because it flows out to sea through nine estuaries in southern Vietnam. True to its name (Mekong means Mother River in Laotian), the Mekong River is the lifeline to more than 65 million inhabitants, mainly in downstream countries of Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and Vietnam. The majority of these inhabitants are Buddhists and all three major Buddhist traditions are practiced: Theravāda in Myanmar, Thailand, Laos and Cambodia; Mahayana in China and Vietnam; and Vajrayana in Tibet. Hence, the Mekong is called the “River of Buddhism”. Most residents along the river are poor fishermen living off the river fish catch or poor farmers using the river water and rich silt to grow rice. They also use the river as their principal means of transportation. In the next two decades, the number of the basin inhabitants is expected to increase to over 100 million. Their daily life is constantly threatened by floods, deforestation, pollution as well as ill-planned development projects. The biggest threat to their livelihood is the gigantic hydroelectric dams built or planned in Yunnan Province and the smaller dams in Laos and on the Lower Mekong.
    [Show full text]
  • Downstream Impacts of Lancang Dams in Hydrology, Fisheries And
    Downstream Impacts of Lancang/ Upper Mekong Dams: An Overview Pianporn Deetes International Rivers August 2014 • In the wet season, the Lancang dams run at normal operation levels for power generation and release extra water if the water level exceeds normal water level. • In the dry season, Xiaowan and Nuozhadu will generally release the water to downstream dams so that to ensure other dams can run at full capacity. • The total storage of six complete dams is 41 km3. And the total regulation storage is 22 km3 Dam Name Installed Dam Height Total Regulation Regulation Status Capacity (m) Storage storage Type (MW) (km3) (km3) Gongguoqiao 900 130 0.32 0.05 Seasonal Completed (2012) Xiaowan 4200 292 15 10 Yearly Completed (2010) Manwan 1550 126 0.92 0.26 Seasonal Completed (phase 1 in1995 and phase 2 in 2007) Dachaoshan 1350 118 0.94 0.36 Seasonal Completed (2003) Nuozhadu 5850 261.5 22.7 11.3 Yearly Completed (2012) Jinghong 1750 118 1.14 0.23 Seasonal Completed (2009) Ganlanba 155 60.5 Run-of- Planned river Hydrology Flow Lancang dams has increased dry season flows and reduces wet season flows: • At China border, the flow can increase as much as 100% in March due to the operation of Manwan, Daochaoshan Jinghong and Xiaowan dams (Chen and He, 2000) • On average, the Lower Lancang cascade increased the December–May discharge by 34 to155 % and decreased the discharge from July to September by 29–36 % at Chiang Saen station (Rasanen, 2012) • After the Manwan Dam was built, the average minimum flow yearly decreased around 25% at Chiang Saen (Zhong, 2007) Rasanen (2012) Hydrology Water Level Monthly average water level data from Chiang Khong clearly showed the impacts of the first filling of Nuozhadu Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impacts of Lancang Dams
    Xiaowan Dam Environmental and Social Impacts of Lancang Dams the water to downstream dams so as to ensure other dams can run at full capacity. Xiaowan and Nuozhadu are the two yearly regulated dams with big regulation storages, while all the others have very limited seasonal regulation capacity. A wide range of studies have confirmed that the wet season Summary flow will decrease, while the dry season flow will increase because of the operation of the Lancang dams. Because the This research brief focuses on the downstream impacts on Lancang river contributes 45% of water to the Mekong basin hydrology, fisheries and sedimentations caused by the Lower in the dry season, the flow change impacts on downstream Lancang cascade in China. Manwan and Dachaoshan were reaches will be more obvious increasing flows by over 100% the first two dams completed on the Lancang River (in 1995 at Chiang Saen. An increase in water levels in the dry sea- (first phase) and 2003 respectively) and many changes have son will reduce the exposed riverbank areas for river bank been observed. Many scientific studies have been done to gardens and other seasonal agriculture. Millions of villagers evaluate the impacts from Manwan and Dachaoshan dams who live along the Mekong River grow vegetables in river- by analyzing monitoring and survey data. With the two big- bank gardens and their livelihoods will be largely impacted gest dams of the cascade, Xiaowan and Nuozhadu, put into if losing the gardens. In the wet season, the decrease of operation in 2010 and 2012, bigger downstream impacts are flow at Chiang Saen caused by the Lancang dams holding expected to be observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Study
    8/21/2015 Council Study Work Plan: Formulation of Development Scenarios for the Hydropower Thematic Area 5th RTWG Meeting Siem Reap, Cambodia 13-14 August 2015 Content • Overview and References • HP Sub Scenarios • Potential Hydropower Dams • Data and assumption • Schedule Content • Guidance 1 8/21/2015 Sub Scenario for hydropower thematic area • The concept proposed for Sub Scenario of hydropower thematic area was conceived and proposed for the 1st time for consideration • The concept take stock of the content of the “Assessment of basin-wide Development Scenarios – Apr 2011” and the application of the Preliminary Design Guidance • Figures and numbers are indicative. They can be refined after the concept for HP Sub- Scenarios has been accepted Overview and Referencesand Overview Scenarios Name Level of Development* # ALU DIW FPF IRR NAV HPP 1 Early Development Scenario 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2 Definite Future Scenario 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 3 Planned Development Scenario 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 2040 Note: *Levels of developments for the various thematic areas: ALU = Agric/Landuse Change; DIW = Domestic and Industrial Water Use; FPF = flood protection/floodplain infrastructure; HPP = hydropower; IRR = irrigation; and NAV = Navigation OverviewandReferences 2 8/21/2015 • o Joint Operation (limited coordination) where each hydropower dam will be operated to maximize their individual energy production. The “subset” will be determined with MC on the basis of realistic constraints to full development. • Joint Operation and good coordination among all MS Dams and by taking account operation for navigation lock, fish passages, sediment flushing as well as measure to maintain acceptable water quality during and after sediment flushing.
    [Show full text]
  • MRCS Decision Support Framework (DSF) and BDP Applications
    The MRC Basin Development Plan MRCS Decision Support Framework (DSF) and BDP applications BDP Library Volume 7 March 2005 Revised September 2005 Mekong River Commission j BDP The MRC Basin Development Plan MRCS Decision Support Framework (DSF) and BDP Applications BDP Library Volume 7 March 2005, revised September 2005 Mekong River Commission Foreword The BDP Library was compiled towards the end of Phase 1 of the BDP Programme. It provides an overview of the BDP formulation, together with information about the planning process and its knowledge base, tools and routines. The library incorporates the essence of more than a hundred technical reports, working papers and other documents. It consists of 15 volumes: 1 The BDP planning process 2 Sub-area analysis and transboundary planning 3 Sub-area studies (including 13 sub – volumes) 4 Scenarios for strategic planning 5 Stakeholder participation 6 Data system and knowledge base 7 MRCS Decision Support Framework (DSF) and BDP applications 8 Economic valuation of water resources (RAM applications) 9 Social and environmental issues and assessments (SIA, SEA) 10 IWRM strategy for the Lower Mekong Basin 11 Monographs. March 2005 12 Project implementation and quality plan 13 National sector reviews 14 Regional sector overviews 15 Training The work was carried out jointly by MRC and the NMCs with comprehensive support and active participation by all MRC programmes and more than 200 national line agencies. Financial and technical support was kindly granted by Australia, Denmark, Japan, Sweden and Switzerland. The library has been produced for the purpose of the BDP and is intended for use within the BDP Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Water and Suspended Sediment Budgets in the Lower Mekong from High-Frequency Measurements (2009–2016)
    water Article Water and Suspended Sediment Budgets in the Lower Mekong from High-Frequency Measurements (2009–2016) Dang Thi Ha 1, Sylvain Ouillon 2,3,* ID and Giap Van Vinh 4 1 School of Maritime Economics and Technology, Ba Ria-Vung Tau University, 84254 Ba Ria-Vung Tau, Vietnam; [email protected] 2 LEGOS, Univ. Toulouse, IRD, CNRS, CNES, 14 av. E.-Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France 3 Department of Water Environment Oceanography, University of Science and Technology of Hanoi (USTH), 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, 100000 Hanoi, Vietnam 4 Cuu Long River Hydrological Center, Southern Regional Hydro-Meteorological Center (SRHMC), 84282 Can Tho, Vietnam; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-561332935 Received: 19 April 2018; Accepted: 20 June 2018; Published: 26 June 2018 Abstract: Based on a new dataset of high temporal resolution of water discharge (hourly frequency) and suspended sediment concentration (twice daily frequency at ebb and flood tides) at Can Tho and My Thuan stations during the 2009–2016 period, monthly and annual flow and suspended sediment flux of the lower Mekong River were calculated. The present water discharge of the Mekong River to the sea can be estimated to be 400 km3 yr−1, +/− 100 km3 yr−1 depending on El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and the present sediment supply to the sea can be estimated to be 40 Mt yr−1, +/− 20 Mt yr−1 depending on ENSO. The ENSO influence (proxied by the Southern Oscillation Index—SOI) on Q (water discharge) and Qs (sediment flux) is at maximum at a time lag of 8–9 months.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Hydropower Dams on the Hydrology of the Mekong Basin, April 2014
    SOK 5: The Effects of Hydropower Dams on the Hydrology of the Mekong Basin, April 2014. STATE of KNOWLEDGE The Effects of Hydropower Dams on the Hydrology of the Mekong Basin Compiled by: Jory Hecht and Guillaume Lacombe Key Messages Overall, the projected hydrological impacts of hydropower This State of Knowledge paper sets out to summarize exist- will be stronger than those of climate change. Some studies ing research on how hydropower development will affect suggest, however, that increases in irrigation withdrawals the hydrology of the Mekong River. Hydropower develop- will nearly compensate for the dam-induced increases in ment is expected to modify the hydrology of the Mekong dry season flow within a few decades. River and many of its tributaries by reducing and delaying wet season flows, and increasing dry season flows. The The hydrological impacts of land cover change taking place magnitude of these changes varies by location within the at the same time as hydropower development have only Mekong Basin, and is uncertain because there are differ- been demonstrated in tributary basins. The difficulty of ences among hydrological models and dam development acquiring reliable long-term land cover datasets makes it scenarios. hard to determine the effects of land cover change on the hydrology of the entire basin. Increased dry season flows downstream of dams will provide more opportunities for irrigation, navigation and hydro- Most studies on the hydrological impacts of hydropower power production. Conversely, many ecosystems and live- development in the Mekong attempt to model potential lihoods adapted to natural flow extremes may be affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Why We Should Be Worried About the Mekong River's Future
    ISSUE: 2019 No. 105 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE ANALYSE CURRENT EVENTS Singapore |19 December 2019 Why We Should be Worried about the Mekong River’s Future: A Perspective on Forty Years of Great Change Milton Osborne* EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Mekong River has been transformed over 40 years as the result of dams built in China and now in Laos. • Dams on the Mekong pose a danger to fish stocks and limit the flow of vital sediment. • Navigation plans are a further risk to the river’s health. • Climate change is a growing threat to the river, particularly in the region of the Mekong delta. * Guest writer Milton Osborne is an independent scholar who has had an association with the Mekong River stretching back to the time when he served as an Australian diplomat in Phnom Penh in 1959-61. Subsequently he has held a range of academic and government appointments. He is the author of The Mekong: Turbulent Past, Uncertain Future (2000, updated version 2006), and of two Lowy Papers on the Mekong. 1 ISSUE: 2019 No. 105 ISSN 2335-6677 INTRODUCTION In the course of 2019 a sustained drought in southern China and mainland Southeast Asia brought water in the Mekong River to its lowest levels in 30 years. This disturbing development has focused attention on the major changes to the river’s character stemming from China’s construction of hydroelectric dams on the river’s course in its territory. And this concern has been heightened as, over the past decade and for the first time ever, dams have now been built on the Mekong after the river flows out of China.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Analysis of Earthquake Response of an Ultra-High Earth-Rockfill
    EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Open Access Open Access Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,Natural 1, 2319–2351, Hazards 2013 Natural Hazards www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/1/2319/2013/ and Earth System doi:10.5194/nhessd-1-2319-2013and Earth System NHESSD Sciences Sciences © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 1, 2319–2351, 2013 Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Natural Hazards and Earth Chemistry Chemistry Numerical analysis System Sciences (NHESS). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in NHESS if available. and Physics and Physics of earthquake Discussions response Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric W. X. Dong et al. Measurement Measurement Techniques Techniques Numerical analysis of earthquake Discussions Open Access Open Access Title Page response of an ultra-high Biogeosciences Biogeosciences Abstract Introduction earth-rockfill dam Discussions Conclusions References Open Access Open Access W. X. Dong, W. J. Xu, Y. Z. Yu, andClimate H. Lv Climate Tables Figures of the Past of the Past Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Discussions J I Open Access Received: 18 April 2013 – Accepted: 10 May 2013 – Published: 28 May 2013 Open Access Earth System J I Correspondence to: Y. Z. Yu ([email protected])Earth
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Consequences of Damming the Mainstream Lancang-Mekong River: a Review
    Earth-Science Reviews 146 (2015) 77–91 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Environmental consequences of damming the mainstream Lancang-Mekong River: A review Hui Fan a,b,⁎,DamingHea,b,HailongWangc a Asian International Rivers Center of Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China b Yunnan Key Laboratory of International Rivers and Transboundary Eco-Security, Kunming 650091, China c Huaneng Lancang River Hydropower Company Ltd., Kunming 650214, China article info abstract Article history: Damming rivers to generate hydropower can help mitigate the world's energy crisis and reduce the risk of global Received 12 July 2014 climate change; however, damming can also produce enormous negative effects on the environment and ecosys- Accepted 27 March 2015 tems. The mainstream Lancang-Mekong River within China has been planned as one of the thirteen state hydro- Available online 3 April 2015 power bases. To date, there have been six operational dams along the mainstream Lancang River, and the 15 remaining dams of the proposed Lancang cascade will be completed in the next decades. In this paper, we exam- Keywords: ined several crucial environmental changes and ecological responses that have resulted from the construction Dam construction Environmental impacts and operation of the existing dams of the Lancang cascade. The current literature and observational data suggest Ecosystem responses that the commissioned dams have led to a decline in the flood season water discharge and annual sediment flux Lancang cascade dams within China's borders, reservoir aggradations, and water quality degradation in the reservoirs, which has nega- Mekong River tively affected riverine aquatic biological communities and fish assemblages.
    [Show full text]