DOCSLIB.ORG

Unit-I-Population-Ecology.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unit-I-Population-Ecology.Pdf Chaudhary Mahadeo Prasad College (A CONSTITUENT PG COLLEGE OF UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD) E-Learning Module Subject: Botany (Study material for Post Graduate Students) M.Sc. II Sem COURSE CODE: BOT 508 Ecology and Phytogeography Unit I: Topic Population Ecology Developed by Name: Dr Prateek Srivastava Designation: Assistant Professor DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY Introduction to Ecology Evolution of Definitions of Ecology Ecology = from the Greek root OIKOS, “at home”, and OLOGY, “the study of” Haeckle (1870): “By ecology we mean the body of knowledge concerning the economy of Nature - theinvestigation of the total relations of the animal to its inorganic and organic environment.” Burdon-Sanderson (1890s): Elevated Ecology to one of the three natural divisions of Biology: Physiology Morphology -Ecology Elton (1927): “Scientific natural history” Andrewartha (1961): “The scientific study of the distribution and abundance of organisms” Odum (1963): “The structure and function of Nature” Definition: “Ecology is the scientific study of the processes regulating the distribution and abundance of organisms and the interactions among them, and the study of how these organisms in turn mediate the transport and transformation of energy and matter in the biosphere (i.e., the study of the design of ecosystem structure and function). Beyond Fundamental Ecology Applied Ecology: Using ecological principles to maintain conditions necessary for the continuation of present day life on earth. Industrial Ecology: The design of the industrial infrastructure such that it consists of a series of interlocking "technological ecosystems" interfacing with global natural ecosystems. Industrial ecology takes the pattern and processes of natural ecosystems as a design for sustainability. It represents a shift in paradigm from conquering nature to becoming nature. Ecological Engineering: Unlike industrial ecology, the focus of Ecological Engineering is on the manipulation of natural ecosystems by humans for our purposes, using small amounts of supplemental energy to control systems in which the main energy drives are still coming from non-human sources. It is the design of new ecosystems for human purposes, using the self- organizing principles of natural ecosystems. [Note: The popular definition of ecological engineering is "the design of human society with its natural environment for the benefit of both.". What is the logical flaw in this definition?] Ecological Economics: Integrating ecology and economics in such a way that economic and environmental policies are reinforcing rather than mutually destructive. Urban ecology: For ecologists, urban ecology is the study of ecology in urban areas, specifically the relationships, interactions, types and numbers of species found in urban habitats. Also, the design of sustainable cities, urban design programs that incorporate political, infrastructure and economic considerations. Conservartion Biology: The application of diverse fields and disciplines to the conservation of biological diversity. Restoration Biology: Appllication of ecosystem ecology to the restoration of deteriorated landscapes in an attempt to bring it back to its original state as much as possible. Example, prarie grass. Landscape Ecology: “Landscape ecology is concerned with spatial patterns in the landscape and how they develop, with an emphasis on the role of disturbance, including human impacts” (Smith and Smith). It is a relatively new branch of ecology, that employs Global Information Systems. The goal is to predict the responses of different organisms to changes in landscape, to ultimately facilitate ecosystem management. *** All these disciplines require an understanding of the "organizing principles" of ecosystems, i.e., their ecology. This involves the detailed study of the structure and function of ecosystems in their undisturbed state, and using their designs to: − determine the resilience of ecosystem functions to human activities. − design ecosystems which function in the service of human beings with minimal fossil energy input (ideally none) and minimal waste. − design the industrial infrastructure. − integrate the value of "goods and services" of natural ecosystems into the global economic system. What is "Sustainability"?: There are many definitions of this one, depending on your perspective. Here’s ours: Sustainability is a property of a human society in which ecosystems (including humans) are managed such that the conditions supporting present day life on Earth can continue. Ecology and The Future of Biology “However it is said, the future of biology lies not in the ongoing reduction of biology to molecular tidbits, but in studying biology in its essence; studying the organism and the environment as primary, not derived entities. Both, however, are facets of a single grand problem, the nature of biological organization. Such an emphasis brings to light an entirely different future for biology, one in which understanding the dynamic of the biosphere and the evolution and nature of cellular organization are central issues.” Carl Woese 2006 Levels of Studying Ecology Biosphere: The earth’s ecosystem interacting with the physical environment as a whole to maintain a steady state system intermediate in the flow of energy between the high energy input of the sun and the thermal sink of space (merges with atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere…). ↓ Biome: Large scale areas of similar vegetation and climatic characteristics. ↓ Ecosystem: Set of organisms and abiotic components connected by the exchange of matter and energy (forest, lake, coastal ocean). Or, “the smallest units that can sustain life in isolation from all but atmospheric surroundings.” ↓ Community: Interacting populations which significantly affect each other’s distributions and abundance(intertidal, hot spring, wetland). ↓ Population: Group of interacting and interbreeding organisms ↓ Cell/Organism → Organelle → Molecule → Atom Population Charachteristics Introduction 2. Types of Population 3. Features of Population 3.1 Size and Density 3.2 Dispersion 3.2.1 Spatial Distribution 3.2.2 Temporal Distribution 3.2.3 Dispersal 1. Introduction The common tendency of living beings to stay together in a suitable habitat is the basis of population ecology. Population ecology deals with various features of such groups. These aspects include properties of population, population’s growth and regulation of population growth, each of which is essential to understand population’s performance and status. Under population ecology, structure and dynamics of population are studied. Understanding population ecology is very important for planning conservation strategies. A population is a group of interbreeding individuals of a same species, occupying the same geographical area at a time.Berryman (2002) has modified this definition as “a group of individuals of the same species that live together in an area of sufficient size to permit normal dispersal and/or migration behavior and in which population changes are largely the results of birth and death processes” 2. Types of Populations Organisms which make the population may be unitary or modular depending on their reproductive pattern and thus populations are of two types: 2.1 Unitary Populations - In such populations, each individual are derived from zygote and thus are outcome of sexual reproduction. Identification and distinction of each individual of these populations is very easy, moreover the growth of these individuals is determinate and predictable. Most of the animal populations are unitary populations. For example, in a population of sheep it is very easy to identify and distinguish a sheep on the basis of its fixed morphological features like two legs, one head, two ears, its fur etc. and irrespective of age these features are constant and determinate. 2.2 Modular Populations - In these populations single or few individuals arise from zygote and then produce other individuals/modules by asexual means. Individuals of these populations exhibit variation in their morphological features. Plants and few animal groups like sponges and corals are examples of modular population. In a plant population, no two individuals will have the same number of branches leaves, flowers or fruits. The auxiliary buds or floral buds from where these plant parts developed are known as vertical modular units. Grasses and many plant species like pennywort are also examples of modular populations, which propagate vegetatively by means of horizontal stems or roots. Individuals which are produced by sexual reproduction are known as genets while the ones derived from genets are termed as ramet 3. Features Of Population A population is a group of interbreeding individuals and thus the properties of a population are assessed as of a group, rather than that of an individual. These properties include: 3.1 Size and Density Population size depends upon the geographical area/range occupied by the population and is the total number of individuals in that population. Density of a population is the number of its individuals per unit area. It is an important parameter of a population and is also one of the important indicators of species adaptability to that particular area. It varies with time at one area. Ecologists differentiate density in two types 3.1.1 Crude density: It describes the measure of density for the whole area under consideration, e.g. number of ferns in a rain forest 3.1.2 Ecological density: In measurement of ecological density only that area is considered
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Economics in Ecosystems By: J
    Energy Economics in Ecosystems By: J. Michael Beman (School of Natural Sciences, University of California at Merced) © 2010 Nature Education Citation: Beman, J. (2010) Energy Economics in Ecosystems. Nature Education Knowledge 3(10):13 What powers life? In most ecosystems, sunlight is absorbed and converted into usable forms of energy via photosynthesis. These usable forms of energy are carbon­based. The laws of physics describe the interactions between energy and mass: the energy in a closed system is conserved, and matter can neither be created nor destroyed. Modern physics has shown that reality is more 2 complex at very large and very small scales (e.g., Einstein’s famous equation, E = mc demonstrated that mass can be converted to energy in the sun or nuclear reactors), but in the context of Earth’s ecosystems, energy is conserved and matter can neither be created nor destroyed. This seemingly simplistic statement has profound consequences when we study how ecosystems function. In particular, the energy present within an ecosystem is collected and shared by organisms in many different ways; this "sharing" takes place through ecological interactions, such as predator­prey dynamics and symbioses. When we move to the ecosystem level, however, we consider interactions among organisms, populations, communities, and their physical and chemical environment. These interactions have an important bearing on the structure of organisms, ecosystems, and, over geologic time, the planet itself. A primary example of this involves the energy currency in ecosystems, which is carbon. The amount and form of carbon present in different ecosystem pools — such as plants, animals, air, soil, and water — is controlled by organisms, and ultimately affects their ecological success.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Exclusion Forest Service in Rocky Mountain Ecosystems: Rocky Mountain Research Station
    United States Department of Agriculture Cascading Effects of Fire Exclusion Forest Service in Rocky Mountain Ecosystems: Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-91 A Literature Review May 2002 Robert E. Keane, Kevin C. Ryan Tom T. Veblen, Craig D. Allen Jesse Logan, Brad Hawkes Abstract Keane, Robert E.; Ryan, Kevin C.; Veblen, Tom T.; Allen, Craig D.; Logan, Jessie; Hawkes, Brad. 2002. Cascading effects of fire exclusion in the Rocky Mountain ecosystems: a literature review. General Technical Report. RMRS- GTR-91. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 24 p. The health of many Rocky Mountain ecosystems is in decline because of the policy of excluding fire in the management of these ecosystems. Fire exclusion has actually made it more difficult to fight fires, and this poses greater risks to the people who fight fires and for those who live in and around Rocky Mountain forests and rangelands. This paper discusses the extent of fire exclusion in the Rocky Mountains, then details the diverse and cascading effects of suppressing fires in the Rocky Mountain landscape by spatial scale, ecosystem characteristic, and vegetation type. Also discussed are the varied effects of fire exclusion on some important, keystone ecosystems and human concerns. Keywords: wildland fire, fire exclusion, fire effects, landscape ecology Research Summary Since the early 1930s, fire suppression programs in the United States and Canada successfully reduced wildland fires in many Rocky Mountain ecosystems. This lack of fires has created forest and range landscapes with atypical accumulations of fuels that pose a hazard to many ecosystem characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Meta-Ecosystems: a Theoretical Framework for a Spatial Ecosystem Ecology
    Ecology Letters, (2003) 6: 673–679 doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00483.x IDEAS AND PERSPECTIVES Meta-ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology Abstract Michel Loreau1*, Nicolas This contribution proposes the meta-ecosystem concept as a natural extension of the Mouquet2,4 and Robert D. Holt3 metapopulation and metacommunity concepts. A meta-ecosystem is defined as a set of 1Laboratoire d’Ecologie, UMR ecosystems connected by spatial flows of energy, materials and organisms across 7625, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure, ecosystem boundaries. This concept provides a powerful theoretical tool to understand 46 rue d’Ulm, F–75230 Paris the emergent properties that arise from spatial coupling of local ecosystems, such as Cedex 05, France global source–sink constraints, diversity–productivity patterns, stabilization of ecosystem 2Department of Biological processes and indirect interactions at landscape or regional scales. The meta-ecosystem Science and School of perspective thereby has the potential to integrate the perspectives of community and Computational Science and Information Technology, Florida landscape ecology, to provide novel fundamental insights into the dynamics and State University, Tallahassee, FL functioning of ecosystems from local to global scales, and to increase our ability to 32306-1100, USA predict the consequences of land-use changes on biodiversity and the provision of 3Department of Zoology, ecosystem services to human societies. University of Florida, 111 Bartram Hall, Gainesville, FL Keywords 32611-8525,
    [Show full text]
  • How Can Landscape Ecology Contribute to Sustainability Science?
    Landscape Ecol (2018) 33:1–7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0610-7 EDITORIAL How can landscape ecology contribute to sustainability science? Paul Opdam . Sandra Luque . Joan Nassauer . Peter H. Verburg . Jianguo Wu Received: 7 January 2018 / Accepted: 9 January 2018 / Published online: 15 January 2018 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 While landscape ecology is distinct from sustainability science, landscape ecologists have expressed their ambitions to help society advance sustainability of landscapes. In this context Wu (2013) coined the concept of landscape sustainability science. In August of 2017 we joined the 5th forum of landscape sustainability science in P. Opdam (&) P. H. Verburg Land Use Planning Group & Alterra, Wageningen Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] J. Wu S. Luque School of Life Sciences, School of Sustainability, Julie A. IRSTEA – UMR TETIS Territoires, Environnement, Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State Te´le´de´tection ET Information Spatiale, Montpellier, University, Tempe, USA France J. Wu J. Nassauer Center for Human–Environment System Sustainability School for Environment and Sustainability, University of (CHESS), Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA P. H. Verburg Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 123 2 Landscape Ecol (2018) 33:1–7 Beijing (see http://leml.asu.edu/chess/FLSS/05/index.html). To inspire landscape ecologists in developing research for a more sustainable future, we highlight some of the key points raised there. We emphasize challenges that have been identified in sustainability science that we consider particularly relevant for landscape sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography: an Ecosystems Approach (Geography 338)
    WELCOME TO GEOGRAPHY/BOTANY 338: ENVIRONMENTAL BIOGEOGRAPHY Fall 2018 Schedule: Monday & Wednesday 2:30-3:45 pm, Humanities 1641 Credits: 3 Instructor: Professor Ken Keefover-Ring Email: [email protected] Office: Science Hall 115C Office Hours: Tuesday 3:00-4:00 pm & Wednesday 12:00-1:00 pm or by appointment Note: This course fulfills the Biological Science breadth requirement. COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course takes an ecosystems approach to understand how physical -- climate, geologic history, soils -- and biological -- physiology, evolution, extinction, dispersal, competition, predation -- factors interact to affect the past, present and future distribution of terrestrial biomes and all levels of biodiversity: ecosystems, species and genes. A particular focus will be placed on the role of disturbance and to recent human-driven climatic and land-cover changes and biological invasions on differences in historical and current distributions of global biodiversity. COURSE GOALS: • To learn patterns and mechanisms of local to global gene, species, ecosystem and biome distributions • To learn how past, current and future environmental change affect biogeography • To learn how humans affect geographic patterns of biodiversity • To learn how to apply concepts from biogeography to current environmental problems • To learn how to read and interpret the primary literature, that is, scientific articles in peer- reviewed journals. COURSE POLICY: I expect you to attend all lectures and come prepared to participate in discussion. I will take attendance. Please let me know if you need to miss three or more lectures. Please respect your fellow students, professor, and guest speakers and turn off the ringers on your cell phones and refrain from texting during class time.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Integrative Understanding of Soil Biodiversity
    Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity Madhav Thakur, Helen Phillips, Ulrich Brose, Franciska de Vries, Patrick Lavelle, Michel Loreau, Jérôme Mathieu, Christian Mulder, Wim van der Putten, Matthias Rillig, et al. To cite this version: Madhav Thakur, Helen Phillips, Ulrich Brose, Franciska de Vries, Patrick Lavelle, et al.. Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity. Biological Reviews, Wiley, 2020, 95, pp.350 - 364. 10.1111/brv.12567. hal-02499460 HAL Id: hal-02499460 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02499460 Submitted on 5 Mar 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Biol. Rev. (2020), 95, pp. 350–364. 350 doi: 10.1111/brv.12567 Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity Madhav P. Thakur1,2,3∗ , Helen R. P. Phillips2, Ulrich Brose2,4, Franciska T. De Vries5, Patrick Lavelle6, Michel Loreau7, Jerome Mathieu6, Christian Mulder8,WimH.Van der Putten1,9,MatthiasC.Rillig10,11, David A. Wardle12, Elizabeth M. Bach13, Marie L. C. Bartz14,15, Joanne M. Bennett2,16, Maria J. I. Briones17, George Brown18, Thibaud Decaens¨ 19, Nico Eisenhauer2,3, Olga Ferlian2,3, Carlos Antonio´ Guerra2,20, Birgitta Konig-Ries¨ 2,21, Alberto Orgiazzi22, Kelly S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species Traits Are the Predominant Control on Litter Decomposition Rates Within Biomes Worldwide
    Ecology Letters, (2008) 11: 1065–1071 doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x LETTER Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide Abstract William K. Cornwell,1* Johannes Worldwide decomposition rates depend both on climate and the legacy of plant functional H. C. Cornelissen,1 Kathryn traits as litter quality. To quantify the degree to which functional differentiation among Amatangelo,2 Ellen Dorrepaal,1 species affects their litter decomposition rates, we brought together leaf trait and litter mass 3 4 Valerie T. Eviner, Oscar Godoy, loss data for 818 species from 66 decomposition experiments on six continents. We show Sarah E. Hobbie,5 Bart Hoorens,1 6,7 that: (i) the magnitude of species-driven differences is much larger than previously thought Hiroko Kurokawa, Natalia and greater than climate-driven variation; (ii) the decomposability of a speciesÕ litter is Pe´ rez-Harguindeguy,8 Helen M. consistently correlated with that speciesÕ ecological strategy within different ecosystems Quested,9 Louis S. Santiago,10 David A. Wardle,11,12 Ian J. globally, representing a new connection between whole plant carbon strategy and Wright,13 Rien Aerts,1 Steven D. biogeochemical cycling. This connection between plant strategies and decomposability is Allison,14 Peter van Bodegom,1 crucial for both understanding vegetation–soil feedbacks, and for improving forecasts of Victor Brovkin,15 Alex Chatain,16 the global carbon cycle. Terry V. Callaghan,17,18 Sandra Dı´az,7 Eric Garnier,19 Diego E. Keywords Gurvich,8 Elena Kazakou,19 Julia Carbon cycling, decomposition, leaf economic spectrum, leaf traits, meta-analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Model of Litter Decomposition in the Northern Chihuahuan Desert
    Ecological Modelling, 56 (1991) 197-219 197 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam A general model of litter decomposition in the northern Chihuahuan Desert Daryl L. Moorhead Ecology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-3131, USA James F. Reynolds Systems Ecology Research Group, College of Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-0401, USA (Accepted 13 November 1990) ABSTRACT Moorhead, D.L. and Reynolds, J.F., 1991. A general model of litter decomposition in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Ecol. Modelling, 56: 197-219. Numerous empirical studies have described the pathways of mass, C and N flows during decomposition, but there remains a paucity of data on underlying mechanisms in arid ecosystems. In the northern Chihuahuan Desert, termites remove large quantities of litter and act as carbon and nitrogen sinks, contributing to low soil fertility. In their absence, decomposition at the soil surface is primarily driven by abiotic weathering, but studies suggest buried litter decay occurs through microbiological activities. We develop a general, synthetic model to examine the interactions between buried litter, decomposer microorgan- isms, and C and N pools in this ecosystem. Our goal is to explore the mechanisms underlying observed patterns of decomposition in arid systems using a modeling approach that balances simplicity with enough detail to suggest the reasons for system behavior. To this end, we utilize elements of existing models, interfacing microbial physiology and population dynamics with empirical observations of C and N pool dynamics, litter mass loss and changing C:N ratios. Good agreement was achieved between simulated and observed patterns of mass loss and nitrogen concentrations once a time lag describing the microbial colonization of litter was included.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern and Process Second Edition Monica G. Turner Robert H. Gardner
    Monica G. Turner Robert H. Gardner Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice Pattern and Process Second Edition L ANDSCAPE E COLOGY IN T HEORY AND P RACTICE M ONICA G . T URNER R OBERT H . G ARDNER LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Pattern and Process Second Edition Monica G. Turner University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Zoology Madison , WI , USA Robert H. Gardner University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Frostburg, MD , USA ISBN 978-1-4939-2793-7 ISBN 978-1-4939-2794-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2794-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015945952 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London © Springer-Verlag New York 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • AP Bio Summer Assignment 2018 Mrs. Oswald Welcome to AP Biology! I Look Forward to a Great Year. Due to the Large Volume Of
    AP Bio Summer Assignment 2018 Mrs. Oswald Welcome to AP Biology! I look forward to a great year. Due to the large volume of content we have to cover, your summer assignment will be to read the Ecology Unit--Chapters 52-56 in Campbell Biology, 11th Edition --and complete the following. Support each of the following main ideas in 4-6 sentences . Use many of the provided chapter terms in your answer, but do not feel that you need to use them all. Please highlight the terms that you choose to use in your responses. Your answers should be typed in Google docs using Times New Roman, 12-pt font, double- spaced, and will be Google-checked for original wording upon submission. Please share them with me at [email protected] by the first day of school. You should have approximately 8-10 pages of typed summary by the end of the summer. Please see the example and video references at the end of this document. We will start the school year with a short ecology review followed by an ecology assessment before beginning a new unit. Chapter 52: An Introduction to Ecology and the Biosphere ● Main Ideas ○ Earth’s climate varies by latitude and season and is changing rapidly. ○ The structure and distribution of terrestrial biomes are controlled by climate and disturbance. ○ Aquatic biomes are diverse and dynamic systems that cover most of Earth. ○ Interactions between organisms and the environment limit the distribution of species. ● Chapter Terms o climate, microclimate, macroclimate, tropics, abiotic, biotic, biome, climograph, ecotone, canopy,
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation
    Kevin J. Gutzwiller Editor Applying Landscape Ecology in Biological Conservation With a Foreword by Richard T.T. Foman With 62 Figures, 2 in Full Color Springer Human Conversion of Terrestrial Habitats PETERAUGUST, LOUIS IVERSON, AND JARUNEENUGRANAD 12.1 Introduction In this chapter, we describe how human activities change the abundance and qual- ity of terrestrial habitats and discuss the ecological implications of these changes for biota. We begin by identifying fundamental principles associated with human conversion of terrestrial habitats and how fauna and flora respond to habitat con- version. We present a number of examples of how landscape ecologists and con- servation biologists use these basic principles of land-cover change to develop management strategies to minimize ecological impacts from habitat loss. Next, we discuss principles for applying landscape ecology. We identify major voids in ecological theory and existing data that need to be filled for land managers to be better prepared to apply the principles of landscape ecology to biological conser- vation. Finally, we suggest research approaches that may be used to fill knowl- edge gaps. Although social and economic considerations are fundamental to land- cover change dynamics (Riebsame et al. 1994). detailed discussion of these factors is beyond the scope of this book; therefore, we focus our remarks on the ecological aspects of human conversion of terrestrial habitats. 12.2 Concepts, Principles, and Emerging Ideas Human disturbance is the most significant contemporary agent of change in ter- restrial ecosystems (Forman 1995). The rates with which natural habitats are lost, disturbed landscapes are created, species go extinct, and ecosystem processes are altered are higher now than they have been since the last cataclysmic event that impacted the planet 50 million years ago (Fastovsky and Weishampel 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Wu-2012-LE-Encyclopedia TE.Pdf
    L in real landscapes, and because it facilitates theoretical and methodological developments by recognizing the LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY importance of micro-, meso-, macro-, and cross-scale approaches. JIANGUO WU The term landscape ecology was coined in 1939 by Arizona State University the German geographer Carl Troll, who was inspired by the spatial patterning of landscapes revealed in aer- ial photographs and the ecosystem concept developed Spatial heterogeneity is ubiquitous in all ecological sys- in 1935 by the British ecologist Arthur Tansley. Troll tems, underlining the signifi cance of the pattern–process originally defi ned landscape ecology as the study of the relationship and the scale of observation and analysis. relationship between biological communities and their Landscape ecology focuses on the relationship between environment in a landscape mosaic. Today, landscape spatial pattern and ecological processes on multiple scales. ecology is widely recognized as the science of studying On the one hand, it represents a spatially explicit per- and improving the relationship between spatial pattern spective on ecological phenomena. On the other hand, and ecological processes on a multitude of scales and or- it is a highly interdisciplinary fi eld that integrates bio- ganizational levels. Heterogeneity, scale, pattern–process physical and socioeconomic perspectives to understand relationships, disturbance, hierarchy, and sustainability and improve the ecology and sustainability of landscapes. are among the key concepts in contemporary landscape Landscape ecology is still rapidly evolving, with a diver- ecology. Landscape ecological studies typically involve sity of emerging ideas and a plurality of methods and the use of geospatial data from various sources (e.g., applications. fi eld survey, aerial photography, and remote sensing) and spatial analysis of different kinds (e.g., pattern indi- DEFINING LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY ces and spatial statistics).
    [Show full text]