DOCSLIB.ORG

Pattern and Process Second Edition Monica G. Turner Robert H. Gardner

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pattern and Process Second Edition Monica G. Turner Robert H. Gardner Monica G. Turner Robert H. Gardner Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice Pattern and Process Second Edition L ANDSCAPE E COLOGY IN T HEORY AND P RACTICE M ONICA G . T URNER R OBERT H . G ARDNER LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY IN THEORY AND PRACTICE Pattern and Process Second Edition Monica G. Turner University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Zoology Madison , WI , USA Robert H. Gardner University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Frostburg, MD , USA ISBN 978-1-4939-2793-7 ISBN 978-1-4939-2794-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-2794-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015945952 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London © Springer-Verlag New York 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Printed on acid-free paper Springer Science+Business Media LLC New York is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Dedication Frank B. Golley: Scholar, Mentor, Friend here are people whom we encounter in life who make a real difference. TThey may infl uence us as individuals by their encouragement and guidance; they may affect their community through their untiring commitment to service and the greater good; or they may infl uence an entire profession by their scholarship, leadership, and example. We dedicate this second edition of Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice to Frank B. Golley (1930–2006) who made a real difference in all of these ways. Frank spent most of his career at the University of Georgia and was Monica’s graduate advisor. We marked his many accomplishments previously (see Turner et al. 2007, Landscape Ecology 22:1–3) but note here his service as founding editor of Landscape Ecology , president of the Ecological Society of America and the International Association for Ecology (INTECOL), and director vi of the Biological Sciences Directorate at the National Science Foundation. But beyond his many academic achievements and the lasting infl uence he had on the development of landscape ecology, Frank was a wonderful person, a mentor, and friend who touched both of us deeply. We would not be where we are today with- out him. We thank him for all that he gave of himself, and we still mourn his loss. Frank, this is for you. Preface to the Second Edition Heterogeneity, pattern, process, scale, and hierarchy are intrinsically interrelated concepts … key to the theory and practice of landscape ecology. Wu (2013) he literature of landscape ecology has expanded tremendously since the fi rst edition of Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice was fi nished in T early 2000. Indeed, the number and diversity of published landscape studies is stag- gering. It is wonderful that the fi eld has blossomed, but synthesizing the advance- ments and literature of landscape ecology has been a very daunting task. Nonetheless, we have tried to capture key developments in the fi eld, but we also recognize that this goal will probably be met only partially. Despite a large bibliog- raphy with well over 1000 references cited, there was no way to include all studies. By necessity, our examples and citations are illustrative, not comprehensive. How is the second edition organized, and in what ways does it differ from the fi rst edition? The fi rst two chapters set the stage. Chapter 1 ( Introduction to Landscape Ecology and Scale ) introduces the fi eld of landscape ecology and reviews its intellectual foundations, and it now includes a basic introduction to scale con- cepts and terminology. Scale remains important, but we no longer felt it required a stand-alone chapter; however, scale issues infuse the rest of the book. Chapter 2 ( Causes of Landscape Pattern ) has been much enhanced. Treatment of multiple and contingent causation is much expanded, along with the challenges associated with forecasting future landscape patterns in the context of multiple changing drivers. viii Landscape development and landscape legacies are also treated in greater depth, refl ecting advances in understanding of how land-use history affects contemporary landscapes. After setting the stage, three chapters deal with quantitative methods in land- scape ecology. These analysis methods are key tools for scholars and practitioners in landscape ecology and the means to the end in many studies. Chapter 3 ( Introduction to Models ) focuses on simulation modeling, providing an overview of spatially explicit landscape models, which are used widely in landscape ecology. Chapter 3 also presents neutral landscape models (NLMs), which were instrumen- tal in early quantitative studies of pattern–process relationships. Some readers (especially those who are new to spatial pattern analysis) may prefer to read Chaps. 4 and 5 before reading Chap. 3 . Chapter 4 ( Landscape Metrics ) covers the range of landscape metrics used with categorical data, including metrics calculated for the entire landscape and by cover type or patch. This chapter has been updated to introduce some newer approaches, but as in the past, it emphasizes proper use and interpretation of metrics rather than exhaustive coverage. Chapter 5 ( Spatial Statistics ) is new and was needed because of substantial advances in methods for analyzing spatial dependence in continuous data, and their wide use. With the foundation established and quantitative methods presented, the next three chapters deal with particular pattern–process relationships. All three chapters have been substantially revised and updated to refl ect the growth of knowledge in these areas. Chapter 6 ( Disturbance Dynamics ) now includes new topics such as landscape epidemiology and disturbance interactions. Chapter 7 ( Organisms and Landscape Patterns ) was extended to cover interactions among species, community structure, species invasions, and landscape genetics. Each of these topics has seen tremendous progress in the past 15 years. Chapter 8 , Ecosystem Processes in Heterogeneous Landscapes ) distinguishes between ecosystem processes character- ized primarily by vertical fl uxes and processes that represent lateral transfers. The last two chapters consider applications and synthesis. Chapter 9 ( Landscape Dynamics in a Rapidly Changing World ) deals with applications of landscape ecol- ogy and has been thoroughly revised. This chapter now considers landscape indica- tors, climate change, and landscape sustainability, in addition to an expanded treatment of land-use change and landscape scenarios. The fi nal and relatively brief chapter ( Conclusions and Future Directions ) summarizes key lessons from land- scape ecology and directions for future research. Acknowledgements Research that we have conducted over the past 15 years has contributed to the writing of this book. Turner especially acknowledges research funding in support of this effort from the National Science Foundation, including the Long-Term Ecological Research Program (Coweeta LTER: DEB-0823293 and North Temperate ix Lakes LTER: DEB-0822700) and Water Sustainability and Climate Program (DEB- 1038759); the Joint Fire Science Program (Grants 09-1-06-3, 09-3-01-47, 11-1-1- 7); the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; the Department of Zoology and Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin-Madison; and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Turner thanks all the students and postdocs who have been part of my lab for many spirited and fun discussions about landscape ecology; I learn so much from you. I especially thank my recent lab members Pete Blank, Dan Donato, Catherine Frock, Rose Graves, Winslow Hansen, Brian Harvey, Jiangxiao Qiu, Kevin Rose, Amy Uhrin, Tim Whitby, and Carly Ziter, not only for their input but also their understanding when I have absented myself to write. My ideas and understanding of landscape ecology have also benefi tted from long-term collaborations with val- ued colleagues, especially Bill Romme and Scott Pearson, and the outstanding group of excellent ecologists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Graduate students in my Advanced Landscape Ecology course at UW-Madison have been a tremendous source of inspiration and new knowledge. I also thank Sarah Gergel for her hard work and perseverance to complete the second edition of Learning Landscape Ecology , which makes a great companion to this text and offers many options for hands-on learning of the approaches we describe here. Gardner thanks the faculty, staff, and students of the Appalachian Laboratory for their generous support and enthusiasm during the development of this new edi- tion. Special thanks are due Katia Engelhardt, Andrew Elmore, and Matt Fitzpatrick for stimulating discussions, collaboration, and assistance in teaching landscape ecology. None of this would be possible without the love and support of wife, Kim S. Gardner, and family. The University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (UMCES) is a unique institution of which the Appalachian Laboratory is a part. Faculty and students of other UMCES labs, especially the Horn Point Laboratory and Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, provided a stimulating envi- ronment for vetting concepts and ideas with particular thanks to Michael Kemp and Walter Boynton who listened critically and freely offered new ideas.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Landscape Epidemiology of Malaria Within Two
    ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES IN CHANGING ENVIRONMENTS by Luis Fernando Chaves A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Mark L. Wilson, Co-Chair Associate Professor Mercedes Pascual, Co-Chair Professor John H. Vandermeer Assistant Professor Edward L. Ionides “Se puderes olhar, vê. Se podes ver, repara” Jose Saramago © Luis Fernando Chaves All rights reserved 2008 To my grandfather (Don Fernando), with love for his support and advice ii ACKNOWLEGEMENTS I am indebted to many people, primarily to my committee, they helped me in directing and defining my research agenda for this dissertation. First I’d like to thank my two chairs, Dr. Mercedes Pascual and Dr. Mark Wilson. They are very different in almost everything you can imagine, with the exception of being excellent scientists. With one I’m very grateful for the financial support, technical advice and input on scientific questions. With the other I’m grateful for the inspiration to build a comprehensive and dialectic epistemological framework for my career, and for the constant support through several steps in this segment of my journey in Academia. Dr. Ed Ionides was very helpful through his classes and time to instruct me with tools that are fundamental to the analysis of the problems presented here, as well as with the insights and perspectives of somebody with a completely different training. Dr. John Vandermeer is definitively one of my most admired colleagues, he showed me that being a successful ecologist can only be enhanced by being actively involved in the context of our objects/subjects of study.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Exclusion Forest Service in Rocky Mountain Ecosystems: Rocky Mountain Research Station
    United States Department of Agriculture Cascading Effects of Fire Exclusion Forest Service in Rocky Mountain Ecosystems: Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-91 A Literature Review May 2002 Robert E. Keane, Kevin C. Ryan Tom T. Veblen, Craig D. Allen Jesse Logan, Brad Hawkes Abstract Keane, Robert E.; Ryan, Kevin C.; Veblen, Tom T.; Allen, Craig D.; Logan, Jessie; Hawkes, Brad. 2002. Cascading effects of fire exclusion in the Rocky Mountain ecosystems: a literature review. General Technical Report. RMRS- GTR-91. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 24 p. The health of many Rocky Mountain ecosystems is in decline because of the policy of excluding fire in the management of these ecosystems. Fire exclusion has actually made it more difficult to fight fires, and this poses greater risks to the people who fight fires and for those who live in and around Rocky Mountain forests and rangelands. This paper discusses the extent of fire exclusion in the Rocky Mountains, then details the diverse and cascading effects of suppressing fires in the Rocky Mountain landscape by spatial scale, ecosystem characteristic, and vegetation type. Also discussed are the varied effects of fire exclusion on some important, keystone ecosystems and human concerns. Keywords: wildland fire, fire exclusion, fire effects, landscape ecology Research Summary Since the early 1930s, fire suppression programs in the United States and Canada successfully reduced wildland fires in many Rocky Mountain ecosystems. This lack of fires has created forest and range landscapes with atypical accumulations of fuels that pose a hazard to many ecosystem characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Application of a Landscape-Based Lake Typology for the Muskoka River Watershed, Ontario, Canada
    Development and application of a landscape-based lake typology for the Muskoka River Watershed, Ontario, Canada by Rachel Anne Plewes A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geography Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2015, Rachel Anne Plewes ABSTRACT Lake management typologies have been used successfully in many parts of Europe, but their use in Canada has been limited. In this study, a lake typology was developed for 650 lakes within the Muskoka River Watershed (MRW), Ontario, Canada, to quantify freshwater, terrestrial, and human landscape influences on water quality (Ca, pH, TP and DOC). Five distinct lake types were identified, using a hierarchical system based on three broad physiographic regions within the MRW, and lake and catchment morphometrics derived through digital terrain analysis. The three regions exhibited significantly different DOC concentrations (F=15.85; p<0.001), whereas the lake types had significantly different TP concentrations (F=12.88, p<0.001). Type-specific reference conditions were used to identify lakes affected by human activities that may be in need of restoration due to high TP concentrations. Overall, this thesis demonstrates the applicability of new and emerging landscape modelling tools for lake classification and management in Ontario, Canada. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Murray C. Richardson for his guidance and support throughout the past 2 years. Additionally, I appreciate all of Dr. Derek Mueller’s feedback on the drafts of this thesis. I am grateful for the guidance I received from Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationality and Masculinity in Superhero Narratives Kevin Lee Chiat Bachelor of Arts (Communication Studies) with Second Class Honours
    i Being a Superhero is Amazing, Everyone Should Try It: Relationality and Masculinity in Superhero Narratives Kevin Lee Chiat Bachelor of Arts (Communication Studies) with Second Class Honours This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia School of Humanities 2021 ii THESIS DECLARATION I, Kevin Chiat, certify that: This thesis has been substantially accomplished during enrolment in this degree. This thesis does not contain material which has been submitted for the award of any other degree or diploma in my name, in any university or other tertiary institution. In the future, no part of this thesis will be used in a submission in my name, for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of The University of Western Australia and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. This thesis does not contain any material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. This thesis does not violate or infringe any copyright, trademark, patent, or other rights whatsoever of any person. This thesis does not contain work that I have published, nor work under review for publication. Signature Date: 17/12/2020 ii iii ABSTRACT Since the development of the superhero genre in the late 1930s it has been a contentious area of cultural discourse, particularly concerning its depictions of gender politics. A major critique of the genre is that it simply represents an adolescent male power fantasy; and presents a world view that valorises masculinist individualism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nfluence of Land Use and the Catchment Properties
    THE INFLUENCE OF LAND USE AND THE CATCHMENT PROPERTIES ON THE TROPHIC STATUS OF SHALLOW LAKES IN TURKEY A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY SAADET PEREN TUZKAYA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BIOLOGY FEBRUARY 2015 Approval of the thesis: THE INFLUENCE OF LAND USE AND THE CATCHMENT PROPERTIES ON THE TROPHIC STATUS OF SHALLOW LAKES IN TURKEY submitted by SAADET PEREN TUZKAYA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin DURAL ÜNVER ________________ Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Orhan ADALI ________________ Head of Department, Biology Assoc. Prof. Dr. C. Can BİLGİN ________________ Supervisor, Biology Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Meryem Beklioğlu YERLİ ________________ Co-Supervisor, Biology Dept., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Zeki KAYA ________________ Biology Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. C. Can BİLGİN ________________ Biology Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Zuhal AKYÜREK ________________ Civil Engineering Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Meryem BEKLİOĞLU YERLİ ________________ Biology Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Ayşegül Çetin GÖZEN ________________ Biology Dept., METU Date: 16.02.2015 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Saadet Peren Tuzkaya Signature: iv ABSTRACT THE INFLUENCE OF LAND USE AND THE CATCHMENT PROPERTIES ON THE TROPHIC STATUS OF SHALLOW LAKES IN TURKEY Tuzkaya, Saadet Peren M.S., Department of Biology Supervisor: Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Meta-Ecosystems: a Theoretical Framework for a Spatial Ecosystem Ecology
    Ecology Letters, (2003) 6: 673–679 doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00483.x IDEAS AND PERSPECTIVES Meta-ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology Abstract Michel Loreau1*, Nicolas This contribution proposes the meta-ecosystem concept as a natural extension of the Mouquet2,4 and Robert D. Holt3 metapopulation and metacommunity concepts. A meta-ecosystem is defined as a set of 1Laboratoire d’Ecologie, UMR ecosystems connected by spatial flows of energy, materials and organisms across 7625, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure, ecosystem boundaries. This concept provides a powerful theoretical tool to understand 46 rue d’Ulm, F–75230 Paris the emergent properties that arise from spatial coupling of local ecosystems, such as Cedex 05, France global source–sink constraints, diversity–productivity patterns, stabilization of ecosystem 2Department of Biological processes and indirect interactions at landscape or regional scales. The meta-ecosystem Science and School of perspective thereby has the potential to integrate the perspectives of community and Computational Science and Information Technology, Florida landscape ecology, to provide novel fundamental insights into the dynamics and State University, Tallahassee, FL functioning of ecosystems from local to global scales, and to increase our ability to 32306-1100, USA predict the consequences of land-use changes on biodiversity and the provision of 3Department of Zoology, ecosystem services to human societies. University of Florida, 111 Bartram Hall, Gainesville, FL Keywords 32611-8525,
    [Show full text]
  • Saviors, PART 1
    ® Saviors, PART 1 Tim Seeley • Diego Bernard 201992 - 2012 Fred Benes • Arif Prianto Previously In Tim Seeley • writer Diego Bernard • penciller Cover A • John Tyler Christopher Fred Benes • inker Cover B • Diego Bernard, Fred Benes, SAVIORS, Pt. 1 Arif Prianto • colorists & Arif Prianto Troy Peteri • letterer Bryan Rountree, Matt Hawkins, & Filip Sablik • editors Witchblade created by Marc Silvestri, David Wohl, Brian Haberlin, & Michael Turner WITCHBLADE® ISSUE 158. JULY 2012. FIRST PRINTING Published by Image Comics Inc. Office of Publication: 2134 Allston Way, Second Floor, Berkeley, CA For Top Cow Productions, Inc. 94704. $2.99 US. WITCHBLADE® 2012 Top Cow Productions, Inc. All rights reserved. “Witchblade,” the Witchblade logos, and the likenesses of all featured Marc Silvestri - CEO characters (human or otherwise) featured herein are registered trademarks of Top Cow Productions, Inc. Image Comics and the Image Comics logo are Matt Hawkins - President and COO trademarks of Image Comics Inc. The characters, events, and stories in this Bryan Rountree – Managing Editor publication are entirely fictional. Any resemblance to actual persons (living or Elena Salcedo – Director of Operations dead), events, institutions, or locales, without satiric intent, is coincidental. No Betsy Gonia - Production Assistant portion of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the express written permission of Top Cow Productions, Inc. Printed in the U.S.A. For information regarding the CPSIA on this printed material call: 203-595-3636 and provide reference # RICH – 448584. “The challenge is Trying To capTure imaginaTion wiTh lines. BuT when iT works, comics can Be amazing.” Jason howarD ExpEriEncE crEativity Image Comics® and its logos are registered trademarks of Image Comics, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Bags One Shot (1 Shot) Rock'n
    H MAVDS IRON MAN ARMOR DIGEST collects VARIOUS, $9 H MAVDS FF SPACED CREW DIGEST collects #37-40, $9 H MMW INV. IRON MAN V. 5 HC H YOUNG X-MEN V. 1 TPB collects #2-13, $55 collects #1-5, $15 H MMW GA ALL WINNERS V. 3 HC H AVENGERS INT V. 2 K I A TPB Body Bags One Shot (1 shot) collects #9-14, $60 collects #7-13 & ANN 1, $20 JASON PEARSON The wait is over! The highly anticipated and much debated return of H MMW DAREDEVIL V. 5 HC H ULTIMATE HUMAN TPB JASON PEARSON’s signature creation is here! Mack takes a job that should be easy collects #42-53 & NBE #4, $55 collects #1-4, $16 money, but leave it to his daughter Panda to screw it all to hell. Trapped on top of a sky- H MMW GA CAP AMERICA V. 3 HC H scraper, surrounded by dozens of well-armed men aiming for the kill…and our ‘heroes’ down DD BY MILLER JANSEN V. 1 TPB to one last bullet. The most exciting BODY BAGS story ever will definitely end with a bang! collects #9-12, $60 collects #158-172 & MORE, $30 H AST X-MEN V. 2 HC H NEW XMEN MORRION ULT V. 3 TPB Rock’N’Roll (1 shot) collects #13-24 & GS #1, $35 collects #142-154, $35 story FÁBIO MOON & GABRIEL BÁ art & cover FÁBIO MOON, GABRIEL BÁ, BRUNO H MYTHOS HC H XMEN 1ST CLASS BAND O’ BROS TP D’ANGELO & KAKO Romeo and Kelsie just want to go home, but life has other plans.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can Landscape Ecology Contribute to Sustainability Science?
    Landscape Ecol (2018) 33:1–7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0610-7 EDITORIAL How can landscape ecology contribute to sustainability science? Paul Opdam . Sandra Luque . Joan Nassauer . Peter H. Verburg . Jianguo Wu Received: 7 January 2018 / Accepted: 9 January 2018 / Published online: 15 January 2018 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 While landscape ecology is distinct from sustainability science, landscape ecologists have expressed their ambitions to help society advance sustainability of landscapes. In this context Wu (2013) coined the concept of landscape sustainability science. In August of 2017 we joined the 5th forum of landscape sustainability science in P. Opdam (&) P. H. Verburg Land Use Planning Group & Alterra, Wageningen Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] J. Wu S. Luque School of Life Sciences, School of Sustainability, Julie A. IRSTEA – UMR TETIS Territoires, Environnement, Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State Te´le´de´tection ET Information Spatiale, Montpellier, University, Tempe, USA France J. Wu J. Nassauer Center for Human–Environment System Sustainability School for Environment and Sustainability, University of (CHESS), Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA P. H. Verburg Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 123 2 Landscape Ecol (2018) 33:1–7 Beijing (see http://leml.asu.edu/chess/FLSS/05/index.html). To inspire landscape ecologists in developing research for a more sustainable future, we highlight some of the key points raised there. We emphasize challenges that have been identified in sustainability science that we consider particularly relevant for landscape sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an Integrative Understanding of Soil Biodiversity
    Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity Madhav Thakur, Helen Phillips, Ulrich Brose, Franciska de Vries, Patrick Lavelle, Michel Loreau, Jérôme Mathieu, Christian Mulder, Wim van der Putten, Matthias Rillig, et al. To cite this version: Madhav Thakur, Helen Phillips, Ulrich Brose, Franciska de Vries, Patrick Lavelle, et al.. Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity. Biological Reviews, Wiley, 2020, 95, pp.350 - 364. 10.1111/brv.12567. hal-02499460 HAL Id: hal-02499460 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02499460 Submitted on 5 Mar 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Biol. Rev. (2020), 95, pp. 350–364. 350 doi: 10.1111/brv.12567 Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity Madhav P. Thakur1,2,3∗ , Helen R. P. Phillips2, Ulrich Brose2,4, Franciska T. De Vries5, Patrick Lavelle6, Michel Loreau7, Jerome Mathieu6, Christian Mulder8,WimH.Van der Putten1,9,MatthiasC.Rillig10,11, David A. Wardle12, Elizabeth M. Bach13, Marie L. C. Bartz14,15, Joanne M. Bennett2,16, Maria J. I. Briones17, George Brown18, Thibaud Decaens¨ 19, Nico Eisenhauer2,3, Olga Ferlian2,3, Carlos Antonio´ Guerra2,20, Birgitta Konig-Ries¨ 2,21, Alberto Orgiazzi22, Kelly S.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Ecology and Modeling of Fish Populations - FAS 6416
    Spatial Ecology and Modeling of Fish Populations - FAS 6416 1 Overview Spatial approaches to fisheries management are increasingly of interest the conservation and management of fish populations; and spatial research on fish populations and fish ecology is becoming a cornerstone of fisheries research. This course explores spatial ecology concepts, population dynamics models, examples of field data, and computer simulation tools to understand the ecological origin of spatial fish populations and their importance for fisheries management and conservation. The course is suitable for students who are interested in an interdisciplinary research field that draws as much from ecology as from fisheries management. 2 credits Spring Semester Face-to-face Location TBD with course website: http://elearning.ufl.edu/ The course is intended to provide students with different types of models and concepts that explain the spatial distribution of fish at different spatial and temporal scales. The course is new and evolving, and contains structured elements as well as exploratory exercises and discussions that are aimed at providing students with new perspectives on the dynamics of fish populations. Course Prerequisites: Graduate student status in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (or related, as determined by instructor). Interested graduate students in Wildlife Ecology are welcome. Instructor: Dr. Juliane Struve, [email protected]. SFRC Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Rm. 34, Building 544. Telephone: 352-273-3632. Cell Phone: 352-213-5108 Please use the Canvas message/Inbox feature for fastest response. Office hours: Tuesdays, 3-5pm or online by appointment Textbook(s) and/or readings: The course does not have a designated text book. Reading materials will be assigned for every session and typical consist of 1-2 classic and recent papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing Spatial Units for Landscape-Based Management of the Fisheries Protection Program
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2017/040 National Capital Region Choosing Spatial Units for Landscape-Based Management of the Fisheries Protection Program D. T. de Kerckhove1, J.A. Freedman2, K.L. Wilson3, M.V. Hoyer4, C. Chu1, and C.K. Minns5 1Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Aquatic Research and Monitoring Section 2140 East Bank Drive Peterborough, ON K9L 1Z8 2University of Florida, School of Forest Resources and Conservation 3University of Calgary, Dept. of Biological Sciences 4University of Florida, Florida LAKEWATCH 5University of Toronto, Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology July 2017 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Research documents are produced in the official language in which they are provided to the Secretariat. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2017 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: de Kerckhove, D.T., Freedman, J.A., Wilson, K.L., Hoyer, M.V., Chu, C., and Minns, C.K. 2017. Choosing Spatial Units for Landscape-Based Management of the Fisheries Protection Program. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2017/040. v + 44. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]