Blockchain for Digital Government

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Blockchain for Digital Government ELISE European Location Interoperability Solutions for E-Government ISA2 Working Group on Geospatial Solutions 1Ispra , IT - 8 July 2019 Introduction 2 Objectives of the meeting • To exchange views on future ELISE activities till the end of ISA² Programme and beyond aas a part of the transition towards the Digital Europe Programme • To provide an overview of ongoing and recently started ELISE activities • To present in more details few studies recently concluded Agenda General Overview of ELISE ongoing and planned activities Discussion • Basis for a discussion is a Background document sent to the WG members prior the meeting Blockchain for Digital Government The JRC study for ISA2 on blockchain Blockchain has a great potential for governments, yet it is hyped and current implementations are scarce and immature ? What is blockchain and what are governments currently doing with this technology? ? What benefits does it bring for Digital Governments? ? What policy actions are needed to leverage its potential? What is blockchain technology? Intermediary Bank Government Corporation Platform Uncertainties about the John counterparty Sam High transaction costs What is blockchain technology? The Blockchain Registry A chain of ‘blocks’ containing transaction details The technological characteristics of blockchain introduce a unique set of benefits and innovative enablers Technological characteristics Benefits and enablers Transactions are secure and easily Transactions are recorded on a trackable. Ledger provides single distributed ledger which shares source of truth. Complex workflows content across multiple parties involving many parties and transactions can be automated smart contracts, shared database The irrevocable ledger cannot be Blockchain updates entries in an changed - this insures data integrity append-only way and links it to accuracy and auditability previous transactions notarisation Centralized parties are no longer Transactions are verified via a peer- needed to assure transaction validity to-peer consensus mechanism which - there is a change of power towards ensures a common truthful ledger the ecosystem (e.g. citizens) disintermediation JRC project for ISA2 Motivation Value added o Blockchain: o Build on empirical evidence – - Already in the mainstream landscape analysis - Overly hyped o Focus on costs and benefits o Use structured methodologies – o Research: horizontal case study analysis - Mostly speculative - Very little on public sector Objectives o What activities blockchain can serve for in the public sector? o What benefits does blockchain bring for governments and citizens? o Which blockchain services can be scaled-up? o What policy actions are needed to fully utilise these technologies? Case Studies Sample Blockchain-Based E-ID’s (Switzerland) Property Transactions in Blockchain (Sweden) Stadjerspas Smart Vouchers Exonum Land Title (The Netherlands) Registry (Georgia) Pension Infrastructure (The Netherlands) Academic Credential Verification using Blockchain (Malta) Infrachain Governance Framework (Luxembourg) In production In pilot phase Methodology Case Study assesment framework 1. Project characteristics 2. Functionalities • Analytical scope: o Case study analysis 3. Governance o Scale-up analysis 4. Usage o Policy actions 5. Technical architecture 6. Costs 7. Benefits Example 1 Proof of originality What governments can do with blockchain? Blockcerts Academic Credentials • Characterisation: o Blockchain technology used to receive and share individual records and prove their validity to third parties o Public permissioned blockchain serves as a permanent ledger which records lifelong learning achievements o The Blockcerts app provides a wallet where the citizen has full ownership of their records o The Maltese government is exploring the expansion of the current project to also include credentials for refugees Example 1 Proof of originality Blockcerts Academic Credentials • Qualitative benefits: o Ownership of complete records o Selective disclosure o Platform agonistic, open standard • Efficiency gains and savings: o Convenient storage and quick sharing o No hard copies o No payment to issuers for accessing and verification of credentials o No waiting time for verification by issuers o Third parties can individually verify each certification using mobile app or web interface • Inhibitors to deployment: o Legality of blockchain credentials o Legality of blockchain-based validation Source: Blockcerts.org Example 2: Smart contract automation What governments can do with blockchain? Chromaway Property Transactions • Characterisation: o End to end transaction facilitation with smart contracts o Based on private permissioned blockchain technology but easily integratable with legacy systems of ecosystem participants o Land registry and banks are directly involved into workflow Example 2 Smart contract automation Chromaway Property Transactions • Benefits: o Reduce transaction time of weeks to hours (by 95%) o Removing the uncertainty of a different party intervening in the transaction o Improved mortgage handling; increased liquidity of assets o Reduced transaction costs by 90% o Quicker transfer of the title o Increased trust in high value market Main findings #1 1. Ongoing projects experiment with a full spectrum of blockchain functionalities: notarisation, shared database and workflow automation. 2. Services leveraging blockchain notarization are relatively more mature, while more disruptive services still face challenges. 3. Projects with a higher level of maturity tend to have less stakeholder complexity and more centralized governance. 4. Blockchain-based services that are already in operation respond to the clear business needs. They also have active public actors and strong technological partners. 5. Blockchain implementations are predominantly based on open source software. Main findings #2 6. Private data is always stored off-chain. 7. Transaction throughput does not appear to be a major bottleneck. 8. Blockchain technology does not pose a threat of disintermediation of existing public institutions. 9. Blockchain-based designs generate specific cost items, yet overall deployment costs should not be higher than for centralised designs. 10. Blockchain-based services promise a range of benefits to the ecosystem: efficiency gains, transparency, reliability, elimination of hard copies, reduction of operating costs for administration Benefits of technology Project Quantitative benefits Qualitative benefits 1. Exonum Land 400 times faster registration of extract; Improved transparency; higher fault-tolerance; Title Registry reduction of operational costs (over 90%). increased reliability of data 2. Blockcerts Citizens' ownership of data, convenient storage; quick and selective sharing; identity and privacy Academic Lower operation cost; efficiency gains; protected; no hard copies; elimination of fake lower integration cost. Credentials certificates. 3. Chromaway Est. €100M/annum; reduced transaction Increased trust; higher liquidity of assets; time (over 95%); reduced transaction cost Property improved market operation; improved resilience (90%); faster registration and transfer of to record modification and fraud. Transactions land title. 4. Uport Lower administration cost; lower storage Decentralised cost; lower infrastructure cost; efficiency Citizens' ownership of data; reduced risk of gains for administration; efficiency gains cyberattacks. Identity for citizens. 5. Infrachain Increased reliability and resilience; increased Governance Not applicable. transparency and flexibility. Framework 6. Pension Est. €500M/annum; lower storage cost; efficiency gains for pension funds; Increased transparency; increased security of Infrastructure efficiency gains for administration; lower data; improved regulatory oversight. transaction costs for citizens. Lower administration cost; efficiency gains 7. Stadjerspas Effective redistribution; improved auditability of for administration; lower transaction costs public funds. Smart Vouchers for citizens. Scaling-up exploration #1 Factors of scaling potential: Options for scaling: Additional benefits & externalities Replication Economies of scale Coordinated implementation Tech maturity Assessment: • Contribution to the Priority for policy (DSM) scaling potential • Recommendation for Institutional and legal scaling compliance Scaling-up exploration #2 Two services for top-down implementation Conclusions • Blockchain has a clear potential for digital governments: Smart contracts and a shared ledger reduce red tape Blockchain-based services generate efficiency gains and reduce administration costs Increase in transparency, auditability and automation of administrative processes Blockchain-based services provide convenient interface and self-sovereignty Enlarge trust of citizens and companies in governmental processes and recordkeeping Conclusions But… blockchain has not yet demonstrated to be transformative innovation for governments as it is sometimes portrayed, for a number of reasons: Transformative Immature Conclusions Policy actions to enable innovation and utilize the potential of blockchain 4. EU 5. Use Case- 1. Guidance 2. Focused Blockchain Based and 3. Standards Pilot Connection Dedicated Knowledge Definition Development Building Infra- Sharing Blocks structures Expertise building Development of high Framing guidelines Creation of building Creating dedicated value pilots blocks that connect infrastructures for services using use case type blockchain Goal technologies
Recommended publications
  • 16 Volunteered Geographic Information
    16 Volunteered Geographic Information Serena Coetzee, South Africa 16.1 Introduction In its early days the World Wide Web contained static read-only information. It soon evolved into an interactive platform, known as Web.2.0, where content is added and updated all the time. Blogging, wikis, video sharing and social media are examples of Web.2.0. This type of content is referred to as user-generated content. Volunteered geographic information (VGI) is a special kind of user-generated content. It refers to geographic information collected and shared voluntarily by the general public. Web.2.0 and associated advances in web mapping technologies have greatly enhanced the abilities to collect, share and interact with geographic information online, leading to VGI. Crowdsourcing is the method of accomplishing a task, such as problem solving or the collection of information, by an open call for contributions. Instead of appointing a person or company to collect information, contributions from individuals are integrated in order to accomplish the task. Contributions are typically made online through an interactive website. Figure 16.1 The OpenStreetMap map page. In the subsequent sub-sections, examples of crowdsourcing and volunteered geographic information establishment and growth of OpenStreetMap have been devices, aerial photography, and other free sources. This are described, namely OpenStreetMap, Tracks4Africa, restrictions on the use or availability of geospatial crowdsourced data is then made available under the the Southern African Bird Atlas Project.2 and Wikimapia. information across much of the world and the advent of Open Database License. The site is supported by the In the additional sub-sections a step-by-step guide to inexpensive portable satellite navigation devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science Or Volunteered Geographic Information? the Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Crowdsourcing, Citizen Science or Volunteered Geographic Information? The Current State of Crowdsourced Geographic Information Linda See 1,*, Peter Mooney 2, Giles Foody 3, Lucy Bastin 4, Alexis Comber 5, Jacinto Estima 6, Steffen Fritz 1, Norman Kerle 7, Bin Jiang 8, Mari Laakso 9, Hai-Ying Liu 10, Grega Milˇcinski 11, Matej Nikšiˇc 12, Marco Painho 6, Andrea P˝odör 13, Ana-Maria Olteanu-Raimond 14 and Martin Rutzinger 15 1 International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg A2361, Austria; [email protected] 2 Department of Computer Science, Maynooth University, Maynooth W23 F2H6, Ireland; [email protected] 3 School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; [email protected] 4 School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK; [email protected] 5 School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; [email protected] 6 NOVA IMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), 1070-312 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] (J.E.); [email protected] (M.P.) 7 Department of Earth Systems Analysis, ITC/University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands; [email protected] 8 Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Division of GIScience, University of Gävle, Gävle 80176, Sweden; [email protected] 9 Finnish Geospatial Research Institute, Kirkkonummi 02430, Finland; mari.laakso@nls.fi 10 Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Kjeller 2027, Norway; [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Utilization of Crowdsourcing And
    ABSTRACT UTILIZATION OF CROWDSOURCING AND VOLUNTEERED GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IN INTERNATIONAL DISASTER MANAGEMENT by Julaiti Nilupaer Large-scale disasters result in enormous impacts on vulnerable communities worldwide, and data acquisition has become a major concern in this time-critical situation: the limitations of geospatial technologies impede the real-time data collection, also the absent or poor data collection in some regions. With the current advances of Web 2.0, crowdsourcing and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) have become commonly used. As a potential solution to fill the gap of real-time geographic data, crowdsourcing and VGI enable timely information exchange through a voluntary approach and enhance amateur citizen participation. Importantly, such geographic information can substantially facilitate emergency coordination by fulfilling the needs of impacted communities and appropriately allocating relief supplies and funds. My research interest centers on the utilization of crowdsourcing and VGI for disaster management. Particularly, I work to explore their potential value and contributions by reviewing two notable and destructive disaster events as case studies: the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami, and the 2013 Typhoon Haiyan. In addition, I examine the challenges of this information and seek potential solutions. This research aims to contribute a comprehensive qualitative analysis of how Volunteer and Technical Communities (V&TCs) have used crowdsourced data and VGI to enhance the coordination of disaster management.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteered and Crowdsourced Geographic Information: the Openstreetmap Project
    JOURNAL OF SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE Number 20 (2020), pp. 65–70 doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2020.20.659 INVITED ARTICLE Volunteered and crowdsourced geographic information: the OpenStreetMap project Michela Bertolotto1, Gavin McArdle1, and Bianca Schoen-Phelan2 1School of Computer Science, University College Dublin 2School of Computer Science, Technological University Dublin Received: February 28, 2020; accepted: May 12, 2020 Abstract: Advancements in technology over the last two decades have changed how spa- tial data are created and used. In particular, in the last decade, volunteered geographic information (VGI), i.e., the crowdsourcing of geographic information, has revolutionized the spatial domain by shifting the map-making process from the hands of experts to those of any willing contributor. Started in 2004, OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the pinnacle of VGI due to the large number of volunteers involved and the volume of spatial data generated. While the original objective of OSM was to create a free map of the world, its uses have shown how the potential of such an initiative goes well beyond map-making: ranging from projects such as the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap (HOT) project, that understands itself as a bridge between the OSM community and humanitarian responders, to collaborative projects such as Mapillary, where citizens take street-level images and the system aims to automate mapping. A common trend among these projects using OSM is the fact that the community dynamic tends to create spin-off projects. Currently, we see a drive towards projects that support sustainability goals using OSM. We discuss some such applications and highlight challenges posed by this new paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Mapping Response To
    AMBIENTE M. Minghini* Collaborative mapping L. Delucchi** A. Sarretta*** response to disasters through F. Lupia**** M. Napolitano***** openstreetmap: the case of A. Palmas****** the 2016 italian earthquake * Politecnico di Milano, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Milano, Italy ** Fondazione Edmund Mach, Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Digital humanitarians represent the current generation of volunteers, providing timely contributions Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, in the form of digital map data in the aftermath of natural disasters. Starting from the tragic 2010 San Michele all’Adige, Italy earthquake in Haiti and thanks to the success of the OpenStreetMap (OSM) project, the presence *** Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche and coordination of these volunteers have grown incredibly over the past years. This work investiga- (CNR) – Istituto di Scienze Marine tes the dynamics of the mapping process and the nature of the OSM volunteers who contributed (ISMAR), Venezia, Italy map data after the 2016 earthquake in Central Italy. The analyses show that existing OSM users **** Consiglio per la ricerca were the majority of those contributing to the mapping activity, with less edits performed by new in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia users. The collaborative mapping process was efficiently coordinated through a dedicated platform agraria, Roma, Italy and the area hit by the earthquake was significantly edited in OSM after the disaster. ***** Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Keywords: collaborative mapping, disaster management, earthquake, OpenStreetMap Trento, Italy ****** Wikimedia Italia, Milano, Italy Risposta collaborativa alla mappatura di eventi disastrosi tramite openstreetmap: il caso del terremoto in italia del 2016. I digital humanitarians rappresentano la nuova genera- zione di volontari, capaci di fornire contributi tempestivi sotto forma di dati geografici all’indomani di org), the world’s openly-licensed disastri naturali.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: a Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake
    World Medical & Health Policy www.psocommons.org/wmhp Vol. 2: Iss. 2, Article 2 (2010) Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: A Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake Matthew Zook, PhD, University of Kentucky Mark Graham, PhD, University of Oxford Taylor Shelton, BA, University of Kentucky Sean Gorman, PhD, FortiusOne Abstract This paper outlines the ways in which information technologies (ITs) were used in the Haiti relief effort, especially with respect to web-based mapping services. Although there were numerous ways in which this took place, this paper focuses on four in particular: CrisisCamp Haiti, OpenStreetMap, Ushahidi, and GeoCommons. This analysis demonstrates that ITs were a key means through which individuals could make a tangible difference in the work of relief and aid agencies without actually being physically present in Haiti. While not without problems, this effort nevertheless represents a remarkable example of the power and crowdsourced online mapping and the potential for new avenues of interaction between physically distant places that vary tremendously. Keywords: Haiti, OpenStreetMap, Ushahidi, GeoCommons, volunteered geographic information, crowdsourcing Author Notes: Conflicts of interest: Sean Gorman is employed by FortiusOne Inc. which built the GeoCommons community. He also helped with supporting CrisisCommons, participates in the OpenStreetMap project, and has participated in Ushahidi implementations in Afghanistan and Haiti. Most of the figures in this article are screenshots of publicly available websites and do not require permissions. In all cases the sources are acknowledged. © 2010 Policy Studies Organization Published by Berkeley Electronic Press - 7 - Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2216649 World Medical & Health Policy, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Geographic Information Systems to Increase Citizen Engagement
    Using Geographic Information Systems to Increase Citizen Engagement Sukumar Ganapati Assistant Professor Public Administration Department School of International and Public Affairs College of Arts and Sciences Florida International University E-Government/Technology Series 2 0 1 0 E-GOVERNMENT/TECHNOLOGY SERIES Using Geographic Information Systems to Increase Citizen Engagement Sukumar Ganapati Assistant Professor Public Administration Department School of International and Public Affairs College of Arts and Sciences Florida International University TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ..............................................................................................4 Executive Summary ..............................................................................6 Introduction: Evolution of Geographic Information Systems ...............9 First Wave: Desktop GIS ...................................................................9 Second Wave: Web GIS .................................................................10 Third Wave: Geospatial Web 2.0 Platform .....................................11 Citizen-Oriented Geospatial Web 2.0 e-Government Applications ...13 Citizen-Oriented Transit Information ..............................................13 Citizen Relationship Management ..................................................15 Citizen-Volunteered Geographic Information .................................18 Citizen Participation in Planning and Decision Making ................21 The Future of GIS-Enabled Citizen Participation in Decision
    [Show full text]
  • Participatory GIS in Design of the Wroclaw University of Science and Technology Campus Web Map and Spatial Analysis of Campus Area Quality
    E3S Web of Conferences 29, 00025 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20182900025 XVIIth Conference of PhD Students and Young Scientists Participatory GIS in design of the Wroclaw University of Science and Technology campus web map and spatial analysis of campus area quality Jan Blachowski1,*, Jakub Łuczak1, and Paulina Zagrodnik1 1Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, 27 Wyb. Wyspianskiego St., 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland Abstract. Public participation geographic information system (GIS) and participatory mapping data collection methods are means that enhance capacity in generating, managing, and communicating spatial information in various fields ranging from local planning to environmental management. In this study these methods have been used in two ways. The first one, to gather information on the additional functionality of campus web map expected by its potential users, i.e. students, staff and visitors, through web based survey. The second, to collect geographically referenced information on campus areas that are liked and disliked in a geo-survey carried out with ArcGIS Online GeoForm Application. The results of the first survey were used to map facilities such as: bicycle infrastructure, building entrances, wheelchair accessible infrastructure and benches. The results of the second one, to analyse the most and the least attractive parts of the campus with heat and hot spot analyses in GIS. In addition, the answers have been studied with regard to the visual and functional aspects of campus area raised in the survey. The thematic layers developed in the results of field mapping and geoprocessing of geosurvey data were included in the campus web map project.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Barbara Specialist Meeting Position Papers and Reports
    UC Santa Barbara Specialist Meeting Position Papers and Reports Title Volunteered Geographic Information, Introduction and Position Papers Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1574r603 Authors National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA, UC Santa Barbara) Los Alamos National Laboratory Army Research Office et al. Publication Date 2007-12-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Volunteered Geographic Information Introduction and Position Papers Workshop on Volunteered Geographic Information, December 13-14, 2007 In the past few years a flood of new web services and other digital sources have emerged that can potentially provide rich, abundant, and timely flows of geographic and geo-referenced information. Collectively they might be termed volunteered sources. They include geotagged entries in Wikipedia, the more specialized place descriptions accumulating in Wikimapia, sites such as OpenStreetMap that support volunteer efforts to create public-domain geospatial data layers, the geotagged photographs of Flickr, and mashups with Google Earth and Google Maps. It is now possible to find out an enormous amount about the geographic domain from such sources, provided they can be synthesized, verified, integrated, and distributed. Such sources have earlier precursors in citizen science, as exemplified by the Christmas Bird Count or Project GLOBE. A specialist meeting was held at the Upham Hotel in Santa Barbara, CA on December 13-14, organized under the auspices of NCGIA, Los
    [Show full text]
  • How to Use Apis to Build GIS, Mapping and Location Applications
    How to Use APIs to Build GIS, Mapping and Location Applications ProgrammableWeb recently published an article featuring the top 10 mapping category APIs. Most of the APIs featured in the article are for accessing map libraries or geographic data/content. However, the mapping category includes APIs for programmatically accessing map libraries, geographic data sources, geographic information system and spatial analysis software, location intelligence solutions, indoor venue maps and more. Many companies not only provide APIs for developers, but also provide easy-to-use GIS and mapping solutions that make it possible for users with very little technical knowledge to create beautifully designed static, interactive or animated maps. No matter where you go on the Web these days you’re bound to find a map, all thanks to the availability of easy-to-use GIS solutions and APIs. You can find maps on government open data websites like the DublinDashboard, which features a variety of Web maps that provide information for public transportation, housing, city planning and more. The city of Boston website features a nice selection of city data Web maps and a mapping application that citizens can use to estimate the cost of installing rooftop solar panels. You can find maps in applications for calculating commuting distances like the EV Explorer Web app, which uses maps to help calculate how much money people would save if they drove an electronic vehicle. ORBIS: The Stanford Geospatial Network Model of the Roman World Web app uses maps to provide the costs of different types of travel in antiquity across the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Participatory Social Mapping in the Struggle of the Territory and the Right to the City: a Case Study in Buenos Aires Case Study
    The role of Participatory Social Mapping in the struggle of the territory and the right to the city: A case study in Buenos Aires Case Study Manuel Portela Lucía Paz Errandonea Universitat Jaume I Università degli Studi di Trento Av. Sos Baynat, S/N via Calepina, 14 Castellón de la Plana, Spain 12007 Trento, Italy I-38122 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT people live, and escapes the detail on how relations are built [8]. We present a case study of Social Mapping and Participatory Car- As Pierre Bourdieu described it, "referring to a -problem suburb- or tography over a shaded territory in Buenos Aires City, Argentina. -ghetto- almost automatically brings to mind, not -realities- [...] but The project "Caminos de la Villa" was possible thanks to the collab- phantasms" [5][p. 123]. oration of multiple NGOs that worked together to provide visibility This situation is worse when the territory is made invisible, on development issues in poor neighborhoods, commonly called hiding the unpleasant. This situation is reflected in the lack of "Villas" and "Asentamientos". We take a critical perspective on how public policies oriented to enhance the quality of life and the living developing such tools are embedded of expectation, negotiations conditions of people. The site effect[5] caused by displacement is and interactions between actors. Doing ethnographic research and not just a consequence of location, but a matter of inhabitants’ documentation analysis, we found that the value for residents is not identity and empowerment. in the tool itself but in the appropriation process and empowering, Cartography in general has the power to act as a transmitter and led by acquiring new knowledge at working collectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteered Geographic Information Introduction and Position Papers
    Volunteered Geographic Information Introduction and Position Papers Workshop on Volunteered Geographic Information, December 13-14, 2007 In the past few years a flood of new web services and other digital sources have emerged that can potentially provide rich, abundant, and timely flows of geographic and geo-referenced information. Collectively they might be termed volunteered sources. They include geotagged entries in Wikipedia, the more specialized place descriptions accumulating in Wikimapia, sites such as OpenStreetMap that support volunteer efforts to create public-domain geospatial data layers, the geotagged photographs of Flickr, and mashups with Google Earth and Google Maps. It is now possible to find out an enormous amount about the geographic domain from such sources, provided they can be synthesized, verified, integrated, and distributed. Such sources have earlier precursors in citizen science, as exemplified by the Christmas Bird Count or Project GLOBE. A specialist meeting was held at the Upham Hotel in Santa Barbara, CA on December 13-14, organized under the auspices of NCGIA, Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Army Research Office and The Vespucci Initiative. 44 participants from the academic, industrial, and governmental sectors attended. A number of fundamental questions were examined at this meeting, including: • What motivates citizens to provide such information in the public domain, and what factors govern/predict its validity? • What methods might be used to validate such information, and to attach appropriate metadata to it? • Can VGI be framed within the larger domain of sensor networks, in which inert and static sensors are replaced by, or combined with, intelligent and mobile humans? • What limitations are imposed on VGI by differential access to broadband Internet, mobile phones, and other communication technologies, and by concerns over privacy? Michael F.
    [Show full text]