DOCSLIB.ORG

Cuáles Son Los Gobiernos De La UE: Partidos, Coaliciones

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cuáles Son Los Gobiernos De La UE: Partidos, Coaliciones » Biografías Líderes Políticos (Only in spanish) » _Documentos Especiales » Cuáles son los gobiernos europeos: partidos, coaliciones, primeros ministros Cuáles son los gobiernos europeos: partidos, coaliciones, primeros ministros Un repaso a los 27 gobiernos que componen la UE y Updatte:: 20 Septtemberr 2021 los de otros 11 países europeos ((Úllttiimo cambiio:: nuevo Gobiierno en Allbaniia ell 18//9//2021)) Edited by: Roberto Ortiz de Zárate Presentation Con este documento, CIDOB pasa revista a los gobiernos de los 27 estados miembros de la Unión Europea y de otros 11 países de Europa. El documento, actualizado con los cambios que se van produciendo, se compone de tres partes: una tabla sinóptica a modo de síntesis; un mapa equivalente; y un contenido principal donde se repasa de una manera pormenorizada cada gobierno nacional. (Último cambio: nuevo Gobierno en Albania el 18/9/2021) TABLA SINÓPTICA DE LOS 27 GOBIERNOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA Primer Orientación Situación Año de País Partidos ministro ideológica parlamentaria formación Angela ALEMANIA 3: CDU + CSU + SPD gran coalición Mayoría 2018 Merkel AUSTRIA 2: ÖVP + Die Grünen Sebastian centro Mayoría 2020 Kurz 7: PS + MR + Ecolo + Alexander BÉLGICA CD&V + Open VLD + sp.a centro Mayoría 2020 De Croo + Groen Stefan Gobierno Gobierno interino BULGARIA -: Apartidista (interino) 2021 Yanev técnico apartidista Nikos centro- CHIPRE 1: DISY Minoría 2018 Anastasiadis derecha Andrej centro- Mayoría (con CROACIA 2: HDZ + SDSS 2020 Plenkovic derecha apoyo externo) Mette centro- Mayoría (con DINAMARCA 1: SD 2019 Frederiksen izquierda apoyo externo) 4: OĽaNO + Sme Rodina + Eduard centro- ESLOVAQUIA Mayoría 2021 SaS + Za ľudí Heger derecha 4: SDS + SMC + NSi + centro- ESLOVENIA Janez Jansa Mayoría 2020 DeSUS derecha Pedro Mayoría (con ESPAÑA 3: PSOE + Podemos + IU izquierda 2020 Sánchez apoyo externo) 2: Reformierakond + ESTONIA Kaja Kallas gran coalición Mayoría 2021 Keskerakond 5: SDP + Keskusta + VIHR centro- FINLANDIA Sanna Marin Mayoría 2019 + VAS + SFP/RKP izquierda 7: REM + MoDem + MRSL FRANCIA Jean Castex centro Mayoría 2020 + Agir + PE + TDP + EC Kyriakos centro- GRECIA 1: ND Mayoría 2019 Mitsotakis derecha HUNGRÍA 2: Fidesz-MPSz + KDNP Viktor Orbán derecha Mayoría 2018 3: Fianna Fáil + Fine Gael Micheál centro- IRLANDA Mayoría 2020 + GP Martin derecha 6: M5S + LN + PD + FI + concentración ITALIA Mario Draghi Mayoría 2021 IV + Art. 1 nacional 4: JKP + AP! + NA + Krisjanis centro- Mayoría (con LETONIA 2019 Vienotiba Karins derecha apoyo externo) Ingrida centro- LITUANIA 3: TS-LKD + LRLS + LP Mayoría 2020 Simonytė derecha LUXEMBURGO 3: DP + LSAP + Déi Gréng Xavier Bettel centro Mayoría 2018 Robert centro- MALTA 1: PL Mayoría 2020 Abela izquierda PAÍSES 4: VVD + CDA + D66 + CU centro- Mark Rutte Mayoría 2017 BAJOS (en funciones) derecha Mateusz POLONIA 2: PiS + SP derecha Mayoría (?) 2019 Morawiecki António centro- PORTUGAL 1: PS Minoría 2019 Costa izquierda Mayoría (con REPÚBLICA centro- 2: ANO 2011 + CSSD Andrej Babis pacto de 2018 CHECA izquierda gobernabilidad) 4: PNL + USR + PLUS + centro- RUMANÍA Florin Cîtu Mayoría 2020 UDMR derecha Stefan centro- Minoría (con SUECIA 2: SAP + MP 2021 Löfven izquierda apoyo externo) OTROS GOBIERNOS EUROPEOS NO MIEMBROS DE LA UE Primer Orientación Situación Año de País Partidos ministro ideológica parlamentaria formación centro- ALBANIA 1: PSSh Edi Rama Mayoría 2021 izquierda BOSNIA- 6: SDA + SNSD + HDZ BiH Zoran gran Mayoría 2019 HERZEGOVINA + DF + SBB BiH + DNS Tegeltija coalición Katrín gran ISLANDIA 3: SSF + VG + FSF Mayoría 2017 Jakobsdóttir coalición 5: VV + Guxo + NDS + centro- KOSOVO (*) Albin Kurti Mayoría 2021 KDTP + IRDK izquierda MACEDONIA centro- 3: SDSM + DUI/BDI + Besa Zoran Zaev Mayoría 2020 DEL NORTE izquierda Natalia centro- MOLDOVA 1: PAS Mayoría 2021 Gavrilita derecha Zdravko centro- MONTENEGRO 3: DF + MNN + URA Mayoría 2020 Krivokapic derecha centro- NORUEGA 3: Høyre + Venstre + KrF Erna Solberg Minoría 2017 derecha Boris centro- REINO UNIDO 1: Conservative Party Mayoría 2019 Johnson derecha 7: SNS + SPS + SDPS + gran SERBIA Ana Brnabic Mayoría 2020 PUPS + PS + SNP + SPAS coalición 4: SVP/UDC + SP/PS + Simonetta gran SUIZA Mayoría 2019 FDP/PLR + CVP/PDC/PPD Sommaruga coalición (*) La República de Kosovo cuenta con reconocimiento internacional parcial; la ONU no reconoce al país como Estado soberano independiente. MAPA DE LOS GOBIERNOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA TABLAS NACIONALES DETALLADAS. Los países no miembros de la UE se marcan con (*) ALBANIA (*) Sistema de República parlamentaria Gobierno Monocolor (1 partido): Tipo de Gobierno - Partido Socialista de Albania (PSSh, socialdemócrata) Primer ministro Edi Rama (PSSh); desde 2013 Orientación Centro-izquierda ideológica Fecha de formación 18 de septiembre de 2021 ¿Con mayoría SI: 74 de los 140 escaños del Kuvendi parlamentaria? Principal fuerza de Partido Democrático de Albania (PDSh) la oposición Últimas elecciones 25 de abril de 2021: 1º, PSSh; 2º, PDSh-AN; 3º, LSI Web www.kryeministria.al (*) País no miembro de la Unión Europea ALEMANIA Sistema de República parlamentaria Gobierno Coalición (3 partidos): - Unión Cristiano Demócrata (CDU, conservadores democristianos); Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo Tipo de Gobierno - Unión Social Cristiana (CSU, conservadores socialcristianos); Grupo del Partido Popular Europeo - Partido Social Demócrata de Alemania (SPD); Grupo de la Alianza Progresista de Socialistas y Demócratas Canciller federal Angela Merkel (CDU); desde 2005 Orientación Gran coalición ideológica Fecha de 14 de marzo de 2018 formación ¿Con mayoría SI: 399 de los 709 escaños del Bundestag parlamentaria? Principal fuerza de Alternativa para Alemania (AfD) la oposición Últimas elecciones 24 de septiembre de 2017: 1º, CDU/CSU; 2º, SPD; 3º, AfD Web www.bundesregierung.de Comentarios Angela Merkel, la gobernante más antigua de la UE y estadista resueltamente contraria a pilotar un ejecutivo de minoría, ya va por su cuarto Gobierno, el tercero de gran coalición. El Gabinete Merkel IV, estrenado en marzo de 2018, repite por tanto la fórmula tripartita CDU-CSU-SPD ya probada en las legislaturas 2005-2009 y 2013-2018; el segundo Gobierno, en cambio, fue de coalición con los liberales del FDP. La primera große koalition en la historia de la RFA fue la Kiesinger-Brandt de 1966-1969. AUSTRIA Sistema de República parlamentaria Gobierno Coalición (2 partidos): - Partido Popular Austríaco (ÖVP, conservadores democristianos); Grupo del Tipo de Gobierno Partido Popular Europeo - Die Grünen (Los Verdes-La Alternativa Verde); Grupo de los Verdes/Alianza Libre Europea Canciller federal Sebastian Kurz (ÖVP); desde 2020 Orientación Centro ideológica Fecha de 7 de enero de 2020 formación ¿Con mayoría SI: 97 de los 183 escaños del Nationalrat parlamentaria? Principal fuerza de Partido Socialdemócrata de Austria (SPÖ) la oposición Últimas elecciones 29 de septiembre de 2019: 1º, ÖVP; 2º, SPÖ; 3º, FPÖ Web www.bka.gv.at Comentarios El Gobierno de gran coalición que, bajo el liderazgo de los socialdemócratas, venía funcionando desde 2007 llegó a su fin tras las elecciones federales de 2017, en las que el ÖVP desplazó del primer puesto al SPÖ. El nuevo líder popular y ministro de Exteriores en la legislatura iniciada en 2013, Sebastian Kurz, se convirtió en el más joven primer ministro de la UE apoyado en el bipartito ÖVP-FPÖ, fórmula derechista que Austria probaba por segunda vez en los últimos 17 años; el vicecanciller federal con Kurz era el líder del FPÖ, Heinz-Christian Strache. Más que su vecina Alemania, la República de Austria tiene una amplia experiencia en gobiernos de gran coalición, que han sido casi la norma en este sistema parlamentario centroeuropeo desde el final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, exceptuando los períodos 1966-1987, 2000- 2007 y de nuevo por tercera vez desde 2017. Junto con Luxemburgo, Austria es probablemente el país de la UE que más ha interiorizado el principio del diálogo y el consenso entre las formaciones mayoritarias que conforman la dicotomía clásica de centro-derecha/centro-izquierda. Sin embargo, en 2016 socialdemócratas y popularcristianos, en buena medida debido a la gestión del problema de los refugiados, afrontaron una crisis de credibilidad que amenazó con trastocar de manera drástica el panorama político en Austria. El directo beneficiario de ese desplome de los dos partidos grandes era la derecha populista, euroescéptica y antiinmigración del FPÖ. No obstante, el encumbramiento partidario del jovencísimo Kurz en 2017 hizo resurgir al ÖVP, que tras las elecciones al Nationalrat no tuvo excesivos problemas en pactar con los ultras de Strache. El 18 de mayo de 2019, faltando pocos días para las elecciones europeas, el Gobierno negro-azul de Viena voló por los aires a causa del escándalo mediático protagonizado por el vicecanciller Strache, cazado en unos turbios contactos financieros con un oligarca ruso. Strache dimitió de inmediato y la reacción inicial de Kurz fue anunciar elecciones generales anticipadas y mantener en funciones la coalición con el FPÖ. Sin embargo, dos días después, el canciller despidió al ministro del Interior del FPÖ, Herbert Kickl, y sus compañeros de partido en el Gabinete (entre ellos el sustituto en funciones de Strache al frente del FPÖ, Norbert Hofer), en respuesta, renunciaron a sus carteras. El 22 de mayo Kurz rehizo el Gabinete nombrando a ministros independientes y del ÖVP, pero el día 27 sucumbió a una moción de censura presentada por el pequeño partido Jetzt y que fue apoyada por el SPÖ y el FPÖ. El 28 de mayo todos
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Country Position Name Email Albania President Mr. Ilir Meta [email protected] Prime Minister Mr
    Country Position Name Email Albania President Mr. Ilir Meta [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Edi Rama [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Ditmir Bushati [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Ms. Besiana Kadare [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Ravesa Lleshi [email protected] Belarus President Mr. Alexander Lukashenko [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Siarhiej Rumas [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Vladimir Makei [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Valentin Rybakov [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Mr. Yury Ambrazevich [email protected] Bosnia and HerzegovinaCo-President Mr. Šefik Džaferović [email protected] Co-President Mr. Milorad Dodik [email protected] Co-President Mr. Željko Komšić [email protected] Prime Minister Mr. Zoran Tegeltija [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Igor Crnadak [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Sven Alkalaj [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Nermina Kapetanovic [email protected] Bulgaria President Mr. Rumen Radev [email protected] Prime Minister Ms. Boyko Borissov [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mrs. Ekaterina Spasova Gecheva-Zakharieva [email protected] UN Ambassdor in New York H.E. Mr. Georgi Velikov Panayotov [email protected] UN Ambassdor in Geneva H.E. Ms. Deyana Kostadinova [email protected] Croatia President Mr. Zoran Milanović [email protected] Prime Minister Andrej Plenković [email protected] Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear President, Dear Ursula, We Welcome the Letter of 1 March That
    March 8, 2021 Dear President, dear Ursula, We welcome the letter of 1 March that you received from Chancellor Merkel and PM Frederiksen, PM Kallas and PM Marin. We share many of the ideas outlined in the letter. Indeed, there are some points that we find are of particular importance as we work to progress the digital agenda for the EU. We certainly agree that our agenda must be founded on a good mix of self-determination and openness. Our approach to digital sovereignty must be geared towards growing digital leadership by preparing for smart and selective action to ensure capacity where called for, while preserving open markets and strengthening global cooperation and the external trade dimension. Digital innovation benefits from partnerships among sectors, promoting public and private cooperation. Translating excellence in research and innovation into commercial successes is crucial to creating global leadership. The Single Market remains key to our prosperity and to the productivity and competitiveness of European companies, and our regulatory framework needs to be made fit for the digital age. We need a Digital Single Market for innovation, to eliminate barriers to cross-border online services, and to ensure free data flows. Attention must be paid to the external dimension where we should continue to work closely with our allies around the world and where in our interest, develop new partnerships. We need to make sure that the EU can be a leader of a responsible digital transformation. Trust and innovation are two sides of the same coin. Europe’s competitiveness should be built on efficient, trustworthy, transparent, safe and responsible use of data in accordance with our shared values.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 27-08-2018 - 08:00 Reference No: 20180703STO07133
    Article 27-08-2018 - 08:00 Reference No: 20180703STO07133 Looking ahead: what MEPs will be working on until the end of 2018 In the coming months, MEPs will continue to debate the future of Europe and vote on new rules for energy, telecommunications and transport. State of the EU A debate on the state of the European Union will take place in September. European Commission President Jean Claude Juncker will present the Commission’s plans for the last year of its term to MEPs. Future of Europe As part of debates on the future of Europe initiated by the Parliament this year, heads of state or government have been able to lay out their vision for the EU. Six more will be speaking in plenary before the end of the year: Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, Estonian Prime Minister Jüri Ratas, Romanian President Klaus Iohannis, German chancellor Angela Merkel, Danish Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. Energy In November, MEPs will vote on two deals reached with EU governments on legislation aiming to boost green energy and efficient consumption. In June, Parliament and Council negotiators agreed on a new 32.5% energy efficiency target for 2030. They also agreed that by 2030 at least 32% of energy consumption should come from renewables. Digital single market Directorate General for Communication 1 I 3 European Parliament - Spokesperson: Jaume Duch Guillot EN Contact: [email protected] Article In November, MEPs will vote on rules paving the way for 5G networks by 2020 and capping the prices of calls made to other EU countries, following an informal deal made with EU countries in the Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magnitsky Law and the Rico
    SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies Volume 8 Issue 7, 6-20, July, 2021 ISSN: 2393 – 9125 /doi:10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V8I7P102 © 2021 Seventh Sense Research Group® The Magnitsky Law and The Rico Law - The Guarantee For The Fight Against Corruption And The Mafia In Bulgaria And The European Union - The Example of The Attempts To Steal Private Land Through Concession, Theft of Land And Theft of Land Through State Structures Lord Prof. PhD PhD Momtchil Dobrev-Halachev Scientific Research Institute Dobrev & Halachev.JSC., Sofia.Bulgaria Received Date: 17 May 2021 Revised Date: 22 June 2021 Accepted Date: 05 July 2021 Abstract - Lord prof PhD PhD Momtchil Dobrev- The fight against the mafia and corruption in Bulgaria Halachev and Prof. Mariola Garibova-DObreva and in the European Commission and the European Union developed 2006 “Theory of degree of democracy” and does not yield results because the mafia is at the highest “Theory of degree of justice / injustice /” based on their state and European level and does what it wants. This practice in court, prosecutor's office, state. Prof. Momchil mafia holds courts, prosecutors and all kinds of state Dobrev has been creating Theory of Corruption, "Theory institutions and the latter carry out its orders. of the Mafia," Theory of Mafia "," Financial Banking Resource Technological Mafia Materialism "since 2003" 1.1 Introduce the Problem The problem with the mafia and corruption in Bulgaria Keywords - Crise, mafia, corruption, Magnitsky law, and in the European Union and the European Commission RICO law, finance. is huge. We have repeatedly applied evidence of the scale .
    [Show full text]
  • MNI POLITICAL RISK ANALYSIS – Week Ahead 6-12 Sep by Tom Lake All Timings Subject to Change
    MNI POLITICAL RISK ANALYSIS – Week Ahead 6-12 Sep by Tom Lake All timings subject to change. Monday 6 September: • United Kingdom: Parliament returns from summer recess. Prime Minister Boris Johnson is expected to deliver a statement to the House of Commons on the emergency G7 virtual summit that took place regarding the situation in Afghanistan, as well as an update on the conclusion if the British evacuation effort last week. • European Union: Informal video conference of economy and finance ministers took place. During the meeting, ministers supported the plans for the Czech Republic and Ireland regarding the COVID-19 Recovery and Resilience facility. The Czech Republic is set to receive EUR7bn, with Ireland in receipt of EUR989mn to assist with recovery from the pandemic as well as their efforts on climate and digital transition under NextGenEU. • United States, Canada: Public holiday for Labor Day. Tuesday 7 September: • United States: No set date, but it is anticipated that this week the White House could send a list of ‘anomalies’ to the House and Senate Appropriations panels that it wants funded outside of any already-funded programmes as part of a Continuing Resolution. As of 7 September, there will be 23 days until the federal government runs out of funds, with an agreement of some sort required to avoid a shut-down. While the Democrats control the White House and both chambers of Congress, their demand of a debt-ceiling increase could make the passage of a deal more difficult, with Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) voicing Republican opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Impasse in Bulgaria | May 2021
    BULGARIAN CARETAKER GOVERNMENT as of May 2021 The Caretaker Government is positioning itself as one stepping in to manage a smooth transition, improve Bulgaria’s public image and continue the economic/public health recovery. While the vast political and corporate experience of the cabinet members is seen as a reassuring signal, the appointment of Stefan Yanev, the chief presidential security and defense advisor as caretaker PM, as well as the composition of the caretaker Cabinet have led to speculation that President Radev is looking to exert control over the political landscape. If the snap elections scheduled for July do not produce a stable governing coalition, the Caretaker Government is likely to emerge as a major stakeholder Stefan Yanev Prime Minister A retired brigadier general who has served the last four years as security adviser to President Rumen Radev; an alumnus of the National War College in Washington, Defence Minister in the previous caretaker government appointed by Radev in 2017 Deputy Prime Ministers Galab Donev Boyko Rashkov Atanas Pekanov Deputy Prime Minister Deputy Prime Minister for Public Deputy Prime Minister for for Economic and Social Policies Order and Security European Funds Management and Minister of Labour and Social and Minister of the Interior Policy An economist at the Austrian Institute The most iconic figure in the new for Economic Research (WIFO) Former Secretary of Social Policy and Cabinet; rejected by GERB because and doctoral student at the University Health since May 2017, holding the post he interfered with its willingness of Economics and Business (WU Wien), of Minister in the same department to control the SRS (special intelligence where he teaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgarian Marshall Center Alumni Book
    Marshall Center Graduates from Republic of Bulgaria Capt Sasho Aleksandrov Language: EN CISS Class: 03-7 LC 2003-7, CPT, Company Commander, Motor Transport, MOD. 2006: Student, Military Academy Defense and Staff College, Rakovsky. As of: April 2008. EMail: [email protected] Tel:359 658 2 11 27 FAX: Ms. Diana Aleksandrova Language: EN CISS Class: 06-1 LPASS 2006-1, Desk Officer, USA and Canada, International Cooperation Directorate, MOD. March 2007: Deputy Chief, Protocol Department. August 2008: Chief, Protocol, State Agency for National Security. As of: April 2009. EMail: [email protected] Tel:359 2 92 20 492 FAX: 359 2 981 58 58 COL Petar Aleksiev Language: EN CISS Class: 07-6 SES 2007-6, COL, Director, Defense Information Service Directorate, MOD. As of: August 2007. EMail: [email protected] Tel:00359 29 227 390 FAX: Mr. Toni Aleksiev Language: RU CISS Class: 08-1 EPASS 2008-1, Head of Criminal Police Group, Police. As of: February 2008. EMail: [email protected] Tel:+056 856 127 FAX: Capt Stoyan Alexandrov Language: EN CISS Class: 99-2 LC 1999-2, CPT, Tank Company Commander, Sofia Garrison, MOD. February 2005: Chief of Staff, 2nd Tank Bn, 9 Bde, Gorna Bania. 2008: Company Commander, 5 Bde, Pleven. As of: April 2009. EMail: Tel:359 2 922 8417 FAX: COL (Ret.) Ilian Alipiev Language: RU CISS Class: 02-4 EP 2002-4, COL, Chief, Counterintelligence Department, MOD. Retired. February 2005: Chief, Government Reserves Agency. As of: February 2005. EMail: [email protected] Tel:359 2 921 0284 FAX: Page 1 of 47 Marshall Center Graduates from Republic of Bulgaria MAJ Hristo Anastasov Language: EN CISS Class: 01-3 LC 2001-3, MAJ, Deputy Chief, Aviation Equipment and Weapons, Unit 26930, MOD.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 2021, No. 6
    News Agency on Conservative Europe Report 2021, No. 6. Report on conservative and right wing Europe 20th March, 2021 GERMANY 1. jungefreiheit.de (translated, original by jungefreiheit.de, 18.03.2021) "New German media makers" Migrant organization calls for more “diversity” among journalists media BERLIN. The migrant organization “New German Media Makers” (NdM) has reiterated its demand that editorial offices should become “more diverse”. To this end, the association presented a “Diversity Guide” on Wednesday under the title “How German Media Create More Diversity”. According to excerpts on the NdM website, it says, among other things: “German society has changed, it has become more colorful. That should be reflected in the reporting. ”The manual explains which terms journalists should and should not use in which context. 2 When reporting on criminal offenses, “the prejudice still prevails that refugees or people with an international history are more likely to commit criminal offenses than biographically Germans and that their origin is causally related to it”. Collect "diversity data" and introduce "soft quotas" Especially now, when the media are losing sales, there is a crisis of confidence and more competition, “diversity” is important. "More diversity brings new target groups, new customers and, above all, better, more successful journalism." The more “diverse” editorial offices are, the more it is possible “to take up issues of society without prejudice”, the published excerpts continue to say. “And just as we can no longer imagine a purely male editorial office today, we should also no longer be able to imagine white editorial offices. Precisely because of the special constitutional mandate of the media, the question of fair access and the representation of all population groups in journalism is also a question of democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Whoiswho Official Directory of the European Union
    EUROPEAN UNION EU WHOISWHO OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN COUNCIL 14/09/2021 Managed by the Publications Office © European Union, 2021 FOP engine ver:20180220 - Content: Anninter export. Root entity 1, all languages. - X15splt1,v170601 - X15splt2,v161129 - Just set reference language to EN (version 20160818) - Removing redondancy and photo for xml for pdf(ver 20201206,execution:2021-09-14T18:03:57.732+02:00 ) - convert to any LV (version 20170103) - NAL countries.xml ver (if no ver it means problem): 20210616-0 - execution of xslt to fo code: 2021-09-14T18:04:06.239+02:00- linguistic version EN - NAL countries.xml ver (if no ver it means problem):20210616-0 rootentity=EURCOU Note to the reader: The personal data in this directory are provided by the institutions, bodies and agencies of EU. The data are presented following the established order where there is one, otherwise by alphabetical order, barring errors or omissions. It is strictly forbidden to use these data for direct marketing purposes. If you detect any errors, please report them to: [email protected] Managed by the Publications Office © European Union, 2021 Reproduction is authorised. For any use or reproduction of individual photos, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. LIST OF BUILDINGS (CODES) Code City Adress DAIL Brussels Crèche Conseil Avenue de la Brabançonne 100 / Brabançonnelaan 100 JL Brussels Justus Lipsius Rue de la Loi 175 / Wetstraat 175 L145 Brussels Lex Rue de la Loi 145 / Wetstraat 145 EUROPEAN COUNCIL – 14/09/2021 – 3 BRUSSELS 4 – 14/09/2021 – OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BRUSSELS EUROPEAN COUNCIL – 14/09/2021 – 5 LUXEMBOURG – Kirchberg Plateau 6 – 14/09/2021 – OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION LUXEMBOURG – Gare and Cloche d’or STRASBOURG EUROPEAN COUNCIL – 14/09/2021 – 7 European Council President 9 Members 9 Cabinet of the President 10 8 – 14/09/2021 – OFFICIAL DIRECTORY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION European Council Rue de la Loi 175 / Wetstraat 175 1048 Bruxelles / Brussel BELGIUM Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Merkel Pledges to Rebuild 'Devastated' Flood-Hit Areas
    World Monday, July 19, 2021 05 UNESCO pursues plan to classify Great Barrier Reef as ‘endangered’ DPA The director and the To prevent it from be- and its impact on World Her- World Heritage sites world- BEIJING president of the 44th session, ing red-listed, the Australian itage are an important topic wide. China’s Vice Minister of Edu- government had invited more at the meeting in Fuzhou. The Currently, 53 World Herit- DESPITE opposition in Aus- cation Tian Xuejun, dismissed than a dozen ambassadors on director of the World Herit- age sites are classified as en- tralia, the UNESCO World speculation that the move was a snorkelling trip to the reef age Committee stressed that dangered. Heritage Committee is push- related to political tensions ahead of the meeting. the idea of the List of Endan- For the first time in the ing ahead with plans to classify between China and Australia. Nine of the 15 diplomats gered Sites is “a call to action” history of the World Heritage the Great Barrier Reef, threat- were from countries that in which the entire world com- Convention, two sites could ened by climate change, as an The Great Barrier Reef off would have voting rights at munity should cooperate. lose their title at the session. endangered natural site, the the committee’s meeting, Ernesto Ottone, the UN The Liverpool waterfront, committee’s director Mechtild the east coast of Australia Australian news agency AAP agency’s department head in for example, is to be discussed Roessler said on Sunday. stretches over more than reported.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Chronology
    University of Birmingham Chronology Galpin, Charlotte DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12588 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Galpin, C 2017, 'Chronology: The European Union in 2016', Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12588 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Eligibility for repository: Checked on 28/7/2017 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Managed Expectations: EU Member States' Views on the Conference On
    Working Paper SWP Working Papers are online publications within the purview of the respective Research Division. Unlike SWP Research Papers and SWP Comments they are not reviewed by the Institute. This Working Paper is part of a series of ‘European Perspectives’ – joint analysis and recommendations from SWP authors together with our European partners on current challenges for the European Union. RESEARCH DIVISION EU / EUROPE | WP NR. 03, JUNE 2021 Managed Expectations: EU Member States’ Views on the Conference on the Future of Europe Minna Ålander, Nicolai von Ondarza, Sophia Russack (eds) Abstract The EU institutions (European Commission, European Parliament and Council) have di- verging opinions on the aims and outcomes of the Conference on the Future of Europe. The Council has been the EU institution with the most reservations about the format and aim of the exercise. This scepticism, however, is the lowest common denominator of a more diverse set of priorities and expectations. This report reveals what individual member states want to achieve with the Conference and their expectations of the potential results. It brings together short contributions from a representative cross-section of EPIN members and distils the essential aspects. It inves- tigates the respective governments’ positions on institutional reform ideas, EU Treaty change, prioritised policy fields, plans for national citizen participation and media cover- age, as well as the general current political environment regarding further EU integration. The European Policy Institutes Network comprises 41 think tanks and policy institutes working on EU affairs from 28 Eu- ropean countries, including almost all EU member states as well as candidate countries.
    [Show full text]