DOCSLIB.ORG

Palo Alto Unified Picks New Superintendent Page 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Palo Alto Unified Picks New Superintendent Page 10 Palo Vol. XXXIX, Number 32 Q May 11, 2018 Alto Palo Alto Unified picks new superintendent Page 10 www.PaloAltoOnline.comwww.PaloAltoOnline.com ELECTION SHOWDOWNS Recall of judge, challenge of incumbent sheriff on June 5 ballot Page 5, 7 Summer Class Guide 33 Pulse 19 Transitions 21 Spectrum 22 Eating Out 29 Movies 32 QArts Improv with an Indian flavor Page 25 QHome How to grow successful succulents Page 38 QSports Teams dive into CCS swimming meet Page 57 saturday may 19 9 am – 2 pm Health Matters is a free community event where you can hear from Stanford Medicine’s world-renowned physicians and health-care experts on the latest medical innovations and get tips on healthy living. Topics include: heart health, immunotherapy, stroke prevention, palliative care, chronic disease, and more. Join us Saturday, May 19, at the corner of Campus Drive and Roth Way on the Stanford University School of Medicine Campus. Register online today at healthmatters.stanford.edu. HEALTH TALKS • OUTDOOR HEALTH PAVILION • MED SCHOOL MORNING Page 2 • May 11, 2018 • Palo Alto Weekly • www.PaloAltoOnline.com JUST LISTED! 931 LAUREL GLEN DRIVE, PALO ALTO PRIVACY AND CONVENIENCE IN A RUSTIC SETTING Offering a rare balance of close-in convenience and secluded privacy, this gorgeous 6-bedroom, 6.5-bath estate is as suited to hosting grand affairs as it is to comfortable everyday living. This striking 7,555sf residence is situated on 4.38 acre lot, one of the largest parcels in the City. It offers indoor-outdoor living at its best with sweeping views of the Palo Alto Hills and Peninsula, and balances close-in convenience with a private setting. Additional features of the home include: • Stunning Bay and golf course views • 2IƓFHZLQHFHOODUUHFUHDWLRQPHGLDURRPDQG • Designed for indoor/outdoor entertaining of any scale VLJQLƓFDQWVWRUDJHKREE\VSDFH • Secluded privacy with close-in convenience • Outstanding Palo Alto schools OPEN HOUSE - Sunday 1:30-4:30 Offered at $6,995,000 www.LaurelGlenEstate.com DERK BRILL Wall Street Journal “Top Residential Realtors” in America M: 650.814.0478 [email protected] www.DerkBrill.com License# 01256035 6TXDUHIRRWDJHDFUHDJHDQGRWKHULQIRUPDWLRQKHUHLQKDVEHHQUHFHLYHGIURPRQHRUPRUHRIDYDULHW\RIGLIIHUHQWVRXUFHV6XFKLQIRUPDWLRQKDVQRWEHHQYHULƓHGE\$ODLQ3LQHO5HDOWRUV,ILPSRUWDQWWREX\HUVEX\HUVVKRXOGFRQGXFWWKHLURZQLQYHVWLJDWLRQ www.PaloAltoOnline.com • Palo Alto Weekly • May 11, 2018 • Page 3 Saturday May 12th, 1-6 pm Open to the free public parking & admission featuring: Professional and Collegiate Sports Showcase Battle of the Bands High School edition Garlic Wars, Craft Beer & Wine Tasting for Charity Proceeds benefit local youth sports & mentoring programs Free kid zone Live music farmers market Artisans & Crafts Craft Beer, Cooking for Wine & Cocktails a cause Food Trucks Fundraiser @FacebookFestivals 1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park No pets please. www.FBintheCommunity.com Parking Lots 12 & 14 Trained service dogs only. Page 4 • May 11, 2018 • Palo Alto Weekly • www.PaloAltoOnline.com UpfrontLocal news, information and analysis As recall vote nears, judge defends his record Aaron Persky speaks out about judicial independence, sentencing first-time offenders by Elena Kadvany t was almost three years ago through legal means to block the that Judge Aaron Persky recall; his third attempt was de- I handed down his highest- nied by the California Supreme profile sentence in a windowless Court last week.) Palo Alto courtroom. But now, with less than a month The six months in jail that he left until election day, he is ven- gave to former Stanford Univer- turing back into the public eye sity student Brock Turner, who to make his case to voters. He’s had been convicted of sexually granted media interviews and assaulting an unconscious and held a press conference in Palo intoxicated young woman on Alto on Tuesday. campus the year prior, set off a In an interview with the Palo firestorm of public outrage so Alto Weekly on May 4, Persky strong that he is now facing a re- argued that the recall would set a call election on June 5. His oppo- dangerous precedent for judges, nents argue he has demonstrated who pledge to make decisions in- a pattern of bias against women dependent of public opinion. in sexual and physical violence “I trust that my colleagues on cases. His supporters say Persky the bench will keep their promise, followed the letter of the law in their oath,” he said. “But ... will those cases and contend that the Jane Q Public, looking at what’s recall, if successful, will do ir- happened to Judge Persky, think, reparable damage to judicial in- ‘OK, (in) the next tough sexual- dependence as well as remove a assault sentencing, is this judge Pardee Adam thoughtful, respected judge. going to be able to step into that Aaron Persky, a Santa Clara County Superior Court judge, addresses the media on May 8 about the As a sitting judge, Persky is case and completely tune out effort to recall him, which is on the June ballot. barred from publicly commenting what’s going on around her?’ on open cases he presided over. “We’re required under the code Persky said that while he has rendered are inappropriate. making, I think that is a step too After launching his official retain of judicial ethics to promote pub- doesn’t dispute the right to re- “Substantively I think that re- far,” Persky said. “It really runs campaign in 2016, he released a lic confidence in the judiciary,” call a judge — a relatively rare calls are appropriate where judg- the risk of putting judges out short statement but has otherwise he continued. “I think the recall provision in existence in just es are either incompetent or com- there in the political arena and declined to speak publicly. (Be- will shake that confidence, and nine states — he believes recalls mit misconduct, but when recalls hind the scenes, Persky has tried that’s why I’m against it.” based on the sentences a judge are based on judges’ decision (continued on page 12) A case of child alcoholism, marijuana use and Analysis: the ‘pattern’ cases pornography being molested himself as a obert Chain was arrested child. In June, Persky sentenced by Elena Kadvany in Sunnyvale in May 2014 Chain to four days in county Rfor possession of child jail (two days of which he had ix criminal cases are at athletes in cases involving vio- her own accord, he said. pornography following an inves- already served, plus two days the heart of the campaign lence against women. The role of the probation de- tigation conducted by the Silicon he earned through credit), three Sto unseat Santa Clara The anti-recall campaign partment also differed across Valley Internet Crimes Against years of probation and lifetime County Superior Court Judge argues Persky’s decisions in the cases. Some but not all of Children Task Force. Chain, who sex-offender registration. Con- Aaron Persky. each case were lawful and il- the cases had full probation is Caucasian, was then 48 years ditions of his sentence included The first is the most well- lustrate the record of a judge reports, meaning the proba- old, living in San Jose and em- participation in a sex-offender known: Brock Turner, the who leaned correctly toward tion department interviewed ployed as a plumber. He had a program, individual therapy and former Stanford University rehabilitation for first-time or the defendant and possibly the prior criminal record for driving Alcoholics Anonymous, among student-athlete convicted of low-risk offenders. The cam- victim, conducted a risk as- under the influence. other instructions. sexually assaulting an uncon- paign also argues that the men sessment, reviewed the police Police found about 200 im- Persky recused himself from scious, intoxicated young wom- do not fall into the pattern of report and made a formal sen- ages and one video on his com- the case in August 2016, follow- an outside a fraternity party in being white (only two are), ath- tencing recommendation to the puter, according to court records. ing the Turner sentence, citing 2015. It is Persky’s sentencing letes (two are) and privileged judge. Chain was charged in June 2014 exposure to publicity that might of Turner — six months in (one is). In two cases, Persky waived with one count of possessing/ “reasonably entertain a doubt county jail, three years of pro- The five cases differ from the referral to probation, mean- controlling matter depicting a that the judge would be able to bation and lifetime sex-offend- the Turner case in that none ing the report the department person under age 18 engaging be impartial.” er registration — that sparked went to a jury trial. All of the produced was limited. in or simulating sexual conduct. The recall campaign argues the recall the judge now faces. sentences except one were ne- The key facts of each case The crime carries a maximum Persky’s sentence was lenient The other five, which Persky gotiated through plea bargains, have been in public dispute three-year penalty and no mini- compared to other Santa Clara presided over during his time meaning the district attorney’s throughout the campaign. To mum. Chain was not suspected County judges’ for similar cases. hearing criminal cases in the office and defense agreed to help inform voters, who will of sexual abuse of a child nor of The anti-recall campaign argues Palo Alto courthouse in 2015 certain charges and punish- decide Persky’s fate on June 5, making the pornography. that Persky properly followed the and 2016, have been brought ments. In an interview with the Palo Alto Weekly reviewed In March 2015, Chain pleaded recommendations of the district forward by the recall campaign the Weekly, Persky described a court records and interviewed guilty to the charge, court re- attorney’s office, defense attor- as evidence of an alleged pat- judge’s role in plea bargains as those involved with the cases to cords show.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Truth in the Brock Turner Case and Recall of Judge Aaron Persky
    Truth in the Brock Turner Case and Recall of Judge Aaron Persky This white paper is a collection of views and personal opinions from alumni and other independent volunteers who have been following since mid-2016 the Brock Turner case and the recall of Judge Aaron Persky. Contributors include lawyers, medical professionals, former investigators and other interested persons. Chanel Miller’s name is being used here because Ms. Miller revealed her identity with her recently published book and her subsequent media and other appearances. Prior to that, materials of this nature referred to her as “Doe” which is why that name may also sometimes appear. What follows are solely the personal views and opinions of the volunteer contributors. [updated as of 1/17/20] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Overview, including seven big lies – page 2 Before, during and after the party – page 11 The arrest, investigation and trial – page 16 Conflicting testimony – page 31 Shortcomings at Stanford – page 35 The aftermath – page 38 NOTE: Throughout this white paper, the boldface and italics in quoted language has been added and was not in the original unless otherwise indicated. 1 OVERVIEW This no doubt will come as a surprise to many readers, but as discussed below, it has become clear from public records and other sources that Brock Turner was wrongfully prosecuted and convicted. To quote from a paper written by two lawyers who independently reviewed the case, the facts did not support a finding of guilty and Turner was actually innocent as a matter of law. He should never have been prosecuted for let alone convicted of the crimes he was charged with.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of Judge Persky
    1 MARK S. ROSEN (SBN 7243 1) Attorney at Law ^ 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 814 - Santa Ana, California 92701 Telephone (714) 285-9838 4 Facsimile (714) 285-9840 Email: [email protected] 5 JAMES McMANIS (SBN 40958) 6 McManis Faulkner a Professional Corporation 7 50 W. San Fernando St., 10th Floor San Jose, California 951 13 8 Telephone (408) 279-8700 9 Facsimile (408) 279-3244 Email: [email protected] 10 Attorneys for Petitioner, AARON PERSKY 11 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 14 15 AARON PERSKY, ) Case No.: 16 ) Petitioner, ) DECLARATION OF AARON PERSKY IN 17 v. ) SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION ) FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 18 SHANNON BUSHEY, Santa Clara County ) AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY Registrar of Voters, ) PEREMPTORY WRIT OF MANDATE 19 ) SHOULD NOT ISSUE Respondent, 20 ) Date: August 1 1 , 20 1 7 21 Michele Dauber, Magdalena G. Carrasco, Grace ) Time: 8:15 a.m. H. Mah, Robert Livengood, Raul Peralez, Richard ) Dept.: TBD 22 Tran, Gary Kremen, Patrick J. Burt, Amado M. ) Judge: TBD Padilla, Shanta Franco-Clausen, Yan Zao, Jennifer) 23 Briscoe, Suzanne E. Doty, Allan Seid, M. Veira C.) IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED Whye, Kavita Tankha, Sophia Yen, Gabriel ) ELECTION LAW MATTER ENTITLED TO 24 Manjarrez, Steve Ko, Paulette Altmaier, ) CALENDAR PREFERENCE ) (CODE CIV. PROC., § 35) 25 Real Parties in Interest. 26 27 28 - 1 - DECLARATION OF AARON PERSKY IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION 1 I, Aaron Persky, declare as follows: 2 1 . I am a judge serving on the Santa Clara County Superior Court and the Petitioner in 3 this action.
    [Show full text]
  • Weighing Democracy and Judicial Legitimacy in Judicial Selection
    California Western School of Law CWSL Scholarly Commons Faculty Scholarship 2018 Weighing Democracy and Judicial Legitimacy in Judicial Selection Kenneth S. Klein California Western School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/fs Part of the Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Kenneth S. Klein, Weighing Democracy and Judicial Legitimacy in Judicial Selection, 23 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 269 (2018). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/fs/272 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WEIGHING DEMOCRACY ANDJUDICIAL LEGITIMACY IN JUDICIAL SELECTION KENNETH S. KLEIN* ABSTRACT For over two centuries Americans have debated whether judges should be elected or appointed. While the explicitly-framed tension has been about the relative importance of judicial independence and judicial accountability in a democracy, the underlying issue has been about which structure betterpromotes the legitimacy of the judiciary. An institution has legitimacy when it enjoys diffuse support even for controversial decisions. Judicial legitimacy is in inherent tension with a judiciary in a democracy, since democracy implicitly assumes political elements to selection of all leaders (including judges), while judicial legitimacy is undermined by politics. The contemporary work on the relationship between judicial selection methods and legitimacy does not support a clear preference for judicial election versus judicial appointment. This Article proposes that in order to promote judicial legitimacy in a democracy, considerationshould be given to a civil service-like, nonpartisan, objective merit screening of judicial aspirants-whetherthe aspirant ultimately is selected through election or appointment.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Ethics and Disciplinary Issues
    2018 Annual Conference Niagara Falls, New York Judicial Ethics and Disciplinary Issues September 25, 2018 Presented by: This program has been approved for credit in New York State Robert H. Tembeckjian, Esq. for all attorneys including those who are Hon. Michael Mohun Newly Admitted (less than 24 months) and adminstered by 2.0 MCLE Ethics the Onondaga County Bar Asssociation. JUDICIAL ETHICS AND DISCIPLINARY ISSUES ♦♦♦ NEW YORK STATE MAGISTRATES ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MEETING ♦ SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 ♦ NIAGARA FALLS, NY ♦♦♦ HON. MICHAEL M. MOHUN, JUDGE COUNTY COURT, WYOMING COUNTY ROBERT H. TEMBECKJIAN, ADMINISTRATOR COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT ♦♦♦ PART I: CURRENT ISSUES IN JUDICIAL ETHICS & DISCIPLINE NY Times & LA Times Articles on the Judicial Independence 1 Recall of Judge Aaron Persky1 Removal Determination as to Rochester What Takes So Long? 2 City Court Judge Leticia Astacio2 Bill to Expand Suspension Authority, Proposed Legislation 3 Accelerate/Open Commission Proceedings3 PART II: HOW TO AVOID THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSION 4 Overview of Commission 4 Slide Show 5 An Overview of the Commission5 Undue Delays 6 Gilpatric6 Civility/Demeanor 7 Romano7 Failing to Cooperate 8 O’Connor8 Audit & Control; Staff Supervision 9 Roller,9 Halstead10 Driving While Intoxicated 10 Landicino,11 Astacio12 Ex Parte Communications 11 Young,13 Ayres14 Asserting Prestige of Office 12 LaBombard,15 Ayres16 CONSULT THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ETHICS17 AND THE CITY, TOWN AND VILLAGE COURTS RESOURCE CENTER18 1 Appended 2 http://cjc.ny.gov/Determinations/A/Astacio.htm
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Appointments
    Judicial Council of California Volume 5, Issue 11 Administrative Office of the Courts November/December 2003 Office of Governmental Affairs T HE CAPITOL CONNECTION IN THIS ISSUE EMERGENCY POWERS: JUST IN TIME ecently enacted legislation sponsored When wildfires in Southern California Emergency Powers 1 R by the Judicial Council was instrumen- caused the closure of government offices in tal in allowing the judicial branch to re- San Diego, the presiding judge in San spond to the devastating wildfires in South- Diego requested authorization to declare New PCLC Members 1 ern California in October. October 27 and 28 judicial holidays. The Chief Justice granted this request, giving Assembly Bill 1641 by Assembly Member civil litigants immediate relief from filing Rick Keene (R-Chico) amended Govern- Court Funding 2 deadlines and eliminating the need ment Code section 68115 to give for the court to hear motions to greater authority to the Chief Justice grant relief later. Such steps could Ripped from the when natural or man-made disasters 3 not have been taken prior to the Headlines threaten the orderly operation of the enactment of AB 1641. courts. The bill also included an ur- Judicial Appointments 6 gency provision so that it became In response to the closure of the San effective when it was signed by Diego courts, the Chief Justice Assembly Member New Governor Sworn In 8 the Governor on September 4. also issued an emergency or- One of the bill’s provisions Rick Keene der authorizing the court to (R-Chico) allows the Chief Justice to extend time periods related to LEGISLATIVE grant a request of a presiding various criminal proceedings, CALENDAR judge to declare a day on which a disaster including the time within which arrestees January 1 necessitates the closure of a court a judicial must be arraigned.
    [Show full text]
  • Can You Be a Feminist and a Criminal Defense Lawyer?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Georgetown Law Scholarly Commons Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2020 Can You Be a Feminist and a Criminal Defense Lawyer? Abbe Smith Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2273 American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 57, Issue 4, 1569. This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub CAN YOU BE A FEMINIST AND A CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYER? Abbe Smith* INTRODUCTION Young people in the current cultural generation seem to like the word ªliterally.º They use it often and with great feeling, though not necessarily accurately. Law students will exclaim, for example, that the length of reading assignments is ªliter- ally killing them.º Young public defenders will complain that judges and prosecu- tors are ªliterally driving them crazy.º My son sometimes claims that he is ªliterally starving to death.º I can't help replying to each, ªWell, maybe not literally.º But the answer to the question I pose in this Essay is literally self-evident, for I am both a feminist and a criminal defense lawyer. I have been both of these things for more than thirty years. So yes, of course, one can be a feminist and a criminal defense lawyer: here I am. Moreover, I have answered this question many times in nearly everything I have written since becoming a law professor.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Motion by Judge Persky
    1 MARKS. ROSEN (SBN 72431) Attorney at Law 2 600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 814 Santa Ana, California 92701 3 Telephone (714) 285-9838 4 Facsimile (714) 285-9840 Email: [email protected] 5 JAMES McMANIS (SBN 40958) 6 McManis Faulkner a Professional Corporation 7 50 W. San Fernando St., 10th Floor 8 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone ( 408) 279-8700 9 Facsimile ( 408) 279-3244 Email: [email protected] 10 Attorneys for Petitioner, AARON PERSKY 11 12 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 14 15 AARON PERSKY, ) Case No.: 16 ) Petitioner, ) VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF 17 v. ) MANDATE ) 18 SHANNON BUSHEY, Santa Clara County ) Registrar of Voters, ) 19 ) Respondent, ) 20 ---------------:) IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED 21 Michele Dauber, Magdalena G. Carrasco, Grace ) ELECTION LAW MATTER ENTITLED TO H. Mah, Robert Livengood, Raul Peralez, Richard ) CALENDAR PREFERENCE 22 Tran, Gary Kremen, Patrick J. Burt, Amado M. ) (Code Civ. Proc.,§ 35) Padilla, Shanta Franco-Clausen, Yan Zao, Jennifer) 23 Briscoe, Suzanne E. Doty, Allan Seid, M. Veira C.) 24 Whye, Kavita Tankha, Sophia Yen, Gabriel ) Manjarrez, Steve Ko, Paulette Altmaier, ) 25 ) Real Parties in Interest 26 27 Petitioner Aaron Persky petitions this Court for an alternative writ of mandate and order to 28 show cause, and a peremptory writ of mandate, and by this verified petition alleges: -1- VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE 1 1. Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court issue an alternative writ of mandate and 2 order to show cause, and then a peremptory writ of mandate, commanding the following: 3 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Carceral Feminism, Brock Turner, and the Dilemmas of Seeking Accountability for Sexual Violence in Our Prison Nation
    Interrogating Injustice: Carceral Feminism, Brock Turner, and the Dilemmas of Seeking Accountability for Sexual Violence in Our Prison Nation A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Gender, Sexuality, & Women’s Studies from William & Mary by Willa Quinn Moffatt Accepted for _____Honors______________________________ (Honors) __Claire McKinney_______________________________ Claire McKinney, Director __Victoria A. Castillo_____________________________ Victoria Castillo ___Jackson Sasser________________________________ Jackson Sasser Williamsburg, VA May 10, 2021 Interrogating Injustice: Carceral Feminism, Brock Turner, and the Dilemmas of Seeking Accountability for Sexual Violence in Our Prison Nation Willa Quinn Moffatt Gender, Sexuality, & Women’s Studies Undergraduate Honors Thesis Professor Claire McKinney May 14, 2021 Moffatt 3 Table of Contents I. Epigraph 4 II. Preface 5 III. Background 11 IV. Case Study: The People vs. Brock Turner 21 a. Case Summary b. Sentencing Narrative V. Innocence of Whiteness & the Production of Dangerous Individuals 33 a. Super-Predators and Racialized Youth b. “Brock Turner is Not a Rapist” c. “Goodbye to the Olympics” VI. The Catch-22 for Victims 41 a. The Bind b. The Path to Trial c. Secondary Victimization d. Verdict versus Sentence e. The Recall: Carceral Feminism versus Carceral Reform f. Whose Accountability? VII. Interests of Justice 50 a. Community Justice i. Stanford and the Role of a University ii. Obligations iii. Stanford’s Response b. Victim’s Justice c. Perpetrator’s Justice VIII. Afterword 66 IX. Acknowledgements 70 X. References 71 Moffatt 4 “When you say, ‘What would we do without prisons?’ what you are really saying is: ‘What would we do without civil death, exploitation, and state-sanctioned violence?’ That is an old question and the answer remains the same: Whatever it takes to build a society that does not continuously rearrange the trappings of annihilation and bondage while calling itself ‘free.’” -Kelly Hayes and Mariame Kaba, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Judicial Selection in California
    ST ANFORD Judicial Selection in California Reece Trevor Alexa Graumlich, Elena Mercado, Juan Pablo Perez- Sangimino, Christen Phillips Lucy Ricca, Jason Solomon 2017 559 Nathan Abbot Way Stanford, CA 94305 law.stanford.edu/stanford-center-on-the-legal-profession Executive Summary Systems for selecting state judges vary dramatically across the United States, comprising a complex range of elective and appointive mechanisms. Each of these systems has its advantages and disadvantages for important judicial values. For instance, popularly-elected judges may be more accountable to their state’s electorate, but that same accountability might cause them to impose harsh sentences on criminal defendants or otherwise disfavor unpopular litigants—especially as election season approaches. 1 By examining how different state systems serve or disserve these values, it may be possible to distill broader recommendations to create a fairer and better judiciary. This report, part of a broader investigation into judicial selection by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University, surveys California’s method for selecting judges. California uses a unique hybrid system, combining elements of both the elective and appointive selection models. While California citizens do have the power to elect trial court judges in specific circumstances, the governor appoints the vast majority of judges at the superior (trial), intermediate appellate, and Supreme Court levels. Focusing on California therefore makes sense: if this hybrid works well for California, it might offer the best of both worlds to other states. The report draws on public documents, state archives, and interviews with stakeholders throughout the California judicial community to assess the selection system’s performance in five key areas: quality, independence, accountability and legitimacy, public confidence, and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford University Sexual Assault Case Prompts Backlash
    June 7, 2016 Stanford University sexual assault case prompts backlash Anger over sentence student received leads to recall effort for judge, demonstration plan at graduation By MELISSA KORN and MIRIAM JORDAN Former Stanford University student Brock Turner was sentenced to six months in county jail and three years of probation last week for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman on campus. But for many Stanford students and faculty, the case is far from closed. A coalition led by a Stanford faculty member launched an effort this week to recall the California judge in the case. A student-led protest is planned during graduation ceremonies Saturday. Meanwhile, Mr. Turner’s defense team filed a notice after the sentencing Thursday “preserving Mr. Turner’s right to appeal,” according to Dennis P. Riordan, a San Francisco appeals lawyer who was at the court. The team hasn’t yet decided whether to pursue the appeal, or who would represent Mr. Turner if the appeal proceeds, he said. If an appeal does go forward, it could lead to a new trial — and, potentially, a new sentence. Mr. Turner, a Stanford freshman and competitive swimmer at the time of the attack, was found guilty in March of three felony counts of sexual assault. The victim, who hasn’t been identified and wasn’t a Stanford student, was found behind a dumpster after visiting the campus for a fraternity party in January 2015. The case ignited an uproar after the sentencing and after the victim, known as Emily Doe, read a 12-page statement in court Thursday about the impact of her rape.
    [Show full text]
  • Why California Should End “Unregulated” Judicial Recall Wiemond Wu
    The University of the Pacific Law Review Volume 49 Article 10 Issue 3 1/6/2018 1-1-2018 Crocodiles in the Judge’s Bathtub? Why California Should End “Unregulated” Judicial Recall Wiemond Wu Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uoplawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Wiemond Wu, Crocodiles in the Judge’s Bathtub? Why California Should End “Unregulated” Judicial Recall, 49 U. Pac. L. Rev. 669 (2017). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/uoplawreview/vol49/iss3/10 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Law Reviews at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The nivU ersity of the Pacific Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Crocodiles in the Judge’s Bathtub? Why California Should End “Unregulated” Judicial Recall Wiemond Wu* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 700 II. JUDGES & THE RULE OF LAW ...................................................................... 702 III. THE MEANING OF JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE ............................................... 704 IV. SELECTING JUDGES AS A METHOD OF JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ........... 705 A. Judicial Selection in Federal Court ...................................................... 706 B. Judicial Selection in State Court ........................................................... 707 1. The First Wave: Partisan
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400 San Francisco, California 94102 (415) 557-1200 http://cjp.ca.gov INTRODUCTION The Commission on Judicial Performance, the frst judicial disciplinary body of its kind, was established by legislative constitutional amendment approved by voters in 1960 as an independent state agency. The commission’s mandate has always been threefold: to protect the public, enforce rigorous standards of judicial conduct and maintain public confdence in the integrity and independence of the judicial system. The composition of the commission’s membership—six public members, two attorneys, one appellate court justice and two superior court judges—brings a diverse set of viewpoints to ensure that the perspectives of the judiciary, the legal community and the public are considered in determining the outcome of any particular case. While the vast majority of California judges are committed to maintaining the high standards expected of the judiciary, an effective method of disciplining judges who engage in misconduct is essential to the functioning of our judicial system. The commission’s proceedings provide a fair and appropriate mechanism to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Some have expressed frustration because not all of the commission’s work and deliberations are made public. While some aspects of the disciplinary process and the commission’s work have become more open over the years, California voters have consistently allowed for confdentiality in recognition of the important interests it protects. Confdentiality encourages complainants and witnesses to come forward without fear of reprisal or possible retribution while also protecting a judge’s reputation and the integrity of the judicial process from unwarranted and frivolous complaints.
    [Show full text]