DOCSLIB.ORG

MHI REPORT 2019 FINANCIAL SECTION for the Year Ended March 31, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MHI REPORT 2019 FINANCIAL SECTION for the Year Ended March 31, 2019 MHI REPORT 2019 FINANCIAL SECTION For the Year Ended March 31, 2019 K137-MRFS19E1-A-0, (0.55)19-11, F Printed in Japan SEGMENT INFORMATION Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Consolidated Subsidiaries Fiscal years ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 REVENUE IMPAIRMENT LOSS Millions of yen Thousands of Millions of yen Thousands of U.S. dollars Billions of yen U.S. dollars 5,000 Industry Segment 2018 2019 2019 Industry Segment 2018 2019 2019 Power Systems ¥1,482,457 ¥1,525,108 $13,740,949 Power Systems ¥4,784 ¥1,263 $11,379 4,000 Industry & Infrastructure 1,890,078 1,907,871 17,189,575 Power Systems Industry & Infrastructure 1,248 658 5,928 Aircraft, Defense & Space 718,303 677,577 6,104,847 3,000 Aircraft, Defense & Space 102,304 70,618 636,255 Others 120,748 71,661 645,652 Others — 2,081 18749 2,000 Industry & Subtotal 4,211,588 4,182,218 37,681,034 Infrastructure Subtotal 108,337 74,622 672,330 1,000 Eliminations or Corporate (125,909) (103,874) (935,886) Aircraft, Defense Corporate — — — & Space Total ¥4,085,679 ¥4,078,344 $36,745,148 Total ¥108,337 ¥74,622 $672,330 0 2018 2019 Others, Eliminations or Corporate SHARE OF PROFIT OF INVESTMENTS ACCOUNTED FOR PROFIT FROM BUSINESS ACTIVITIES USING THE EQUITY METHOD Millions of yen Thousands of Millions of yen Thousands of U.S. dollars Billions of yen U.S. dollars Industry Segment 2018 2019 2019 320 Industry Segment 2018 2019 2019 Power Systems ¥87,689 ¥132,897 $1,197,378 Power Systems ¥(2,921) ¥8,187 $73,763 240 Industry & Infrastructure 41,055 Industry & Infrastructure 2,332 70,132 631,876 Power Systems 2,036 18,343 Aircraft, Defense & Space (63,558) (37,469) (337,588) 160 Aircraft, Defense & Space — — — Others 4,443 35,977 324,146 Others 148 1,668 15,028 80 Industry & Infrastructure Subtotal 69,630 201,537 1,815,812 Others, Eliminations Subtotal (440) 11,891 107,135 or Corporate 0 Eliminations or Corporate (11,453) (14,813) (133,462) Aircraft, Defense Corporate 3,110 (954) (8,595) & Space Total ¥58,176 ¥186,724 $1,682,349 Total ¥2,670 ¥10,937 $98,540 -80 2018 2019 DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION REVENUE Composition of Overseas Revenue Millions of yen Thousands of Millions of yen Thousands of by Geographic Distribution U.S. dollars U.S. dollars Industry Segment 2018 2019 2019 Breakdown of Revenue by Customer Location 2018 2019 2019 Middle East Japan ¥1,832,951 ¥1,877,497 $16,915,911 3.0% Power Systems ¥53,493 ¥42,270 $380,845 Africa Others U.S.A. 618,990 627,168 5,650,671 2.2% 1.7% Industry & Infrastructure 51,909 47,835 430,984 Asia 687,373 737,650 6,646,094 Central and South America Europe 432,210 418,514 3,770,736 3.2% Aircraft, Defense & Space 57,503 27,520 247,950 Europe Central and South America 184,564 132,015 1,189,431 10.3% Others 2,517 1,916 17,262 Japan Africa 104,796 91,304 822,632 46.0% Middle East 149,153 123,721 1,114,704 Asia Subtotal 165,424 119,542 1,077,051 18.1% Others 75,639 70,473 634,949 Corporate 8,315 5,364 48,328 Total ¥4,085,679 ¥4,078,344 $36,745,148 U.S.A. 15.4% Note: ‌U.S. dollar amounts in this annual report are translated from yen, for convenience only, at the rate of Total ¥173,739 ¥124,906 $1,125,380 ¥110.99=US$1, the exchange rate prevailing at March 31, 2019. 1 MHI REPORT 2019 FINANCIAL SECTION I MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES GROUP MHI REPORT 2019 FINANCIAL SECTION I MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES GROUP 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS > ANALYSIS OF OPERATING RESULTS stemming from a smaller rate of decline in working capital Breakdown of Interest-Bearing Debt and its Applications > DIVIDEND POLICY paired with an increase in profit before income taxes. The breakdown of interest-bearing debt as of March 31, 2019, Consolidated revenue decreased ¥7.3 billion, or 0.2% year on Under the 2018 Medium-Term Business Plan, MHI Group has Investing activities used net cash of ¥161.8 billion, a was as follows: year, to ¥4,078.3 billion, due to lower revenue from the adopted an ROE of 11% and owners’ equity of ¥1,650.0 billion as decrease of ¥76.3 billion year on year, as proceeds from sales In billions of yen Aircraft, Defense & Space segment. This result was in spite of numerical targets for fiscal 2020. In the process of reaching of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets Due within Due after increased profit in the Power Systems and Industry & Total one year one year these targets, the Group formulated a basic policy of providing increased, and purchases of property, plant and equipment Infrastructure segments. Profit from business activities Short-term borrowings 170.1 170.1 — returns to shareholders at a dividend payout ratio of around and intangible assets decreased. increased ¥128.5 billion, or 221.0%, to ¥186.7 billion, owing to Long-term borrowings 289.9 45.4 244.5 30%, while giving consideration to the balance between busi- Net cash used in financing activities was ¥255.5 billion, an a gain on sale of property, plant and equipment, as well as Bonds 205.0 65.0 140.0 ness growth and financial stability. increase of ¥143.2 billion compared with the previous consoli- increased profit across all segments. Profit before income We will continue to uphold our basic policy on providing dated fiscal year. This result was due largely to the repayment Total 665.1 280.5 384.5 taxes increased ¥143.3 billion, or 365.5%, from the previous returns to shareholders. of short-term borrowings. consolidated fiscal year, to ¥182.6 billion. Consequently, profit MHI Group is involved in various projects with compara- As decided in MHI’s Articles of Incorporation, the Group attributable to owners of the parent increased ¥108.6 billion tively long construction periods. It also owns numerous pays dividends from retained earnings to shareholders twice a Primary Funding Requirements from the previous consolidated fiscal year, to ¥101.3 billion. manufacturing facilities that employ large-scale machinery. year. These payments consist of an interim dividend with a MHI Group primarily requires funds in operating activities for Consequently, MHI Group must secure a stable level of working record date of September 30 and a year-end dividend with a working capital for manufacturing activities (materials, out- > ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL POSITION capital and funds for capital investments. In recent years, record date of March 31. Decisions on interim dividend pay- sourcing, and personnel costs), business development these types of necessary funds for capital investment have ments are made by the Board of Directors, and decisions on Total assets as of March 31, 2019, were ¥5,142.7 billion, down expenses and other selling expenses related to winning new been increasing due to the expansion of MHI Group’s business year-end dividend payments are made at the General Meeting ¥106.0 billion from their level one year earlier, mainly due to a orders, and R&D expenses that enhance the competitiveness scale. Meanwhile, the Group has continued to work to stream- of Shareholders. decrease in contract assets. of its products, strengthen manufacturing capabilities and line its assets and has repaid borrowings that have come due. In accordance with the above policy and after taking into Total liabilities were ¥3,393.9 billion, down ¥160.9 billion enable the launch of new businesses. In investing activities, As a result, the total interest-bearing debt of MHI Group at the overall consideration such factors as the Group’s operating from the previous fiscal year-end. The decrease was attribut- funds are required for capital investments to grow busi- end of fiscal 2018 was ¥665.1 billion, consisting of ¥280.5 bil- performance during the fiscal year and financial conditions, able to such factors as a decline in bonds, borrowings, and nesses, raise productivity, and enable the launch of new lion due within one year and ¥384.5 billion due after one year. the total dividend payment for fiscal 2018 was ¥130 per share, other financial liabilities. businesses as well as for the purchase of investment securi- The interest-bearing debt mentioned above is utilized as comprising the interim dividend of ¥65 per share, paid in Total equity came to ¥1,748.8 billion, up ¥54.9 billion from ties related to the execution of business strategies. working capital and for capital investments required for busi- December 2018, and the year-end dividend of ¥65 per share. the end of the previous fiscal year, due to the posting of In growth areas, MHI Group is planning to purchase invest- ness activities, and MHI Group plans to use these funds mainly Internal reserves will be utilized to further strengthen the ¥101.3billion in profit attributable to owners of the parent ment securities and execute necessary capital investments in key growth fields that are expected to require funds, includ- Group’s corporate structure and enhance the Group’s business and R&D investment. As a whole, the Group plans to stream- ing thermal power systems and commercial aircraft. development going forward > SOURCE OF FUNDS AND LIQUIDITY line its assets and selectively concentrate on core investment Cash Flow Analysis schemes, while anticipating funding requirements in future Financial Policy Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to ¥404.9 growth fields and closely monitoring the latest market envi- MHI Group funds its working capital and capital investments billion, ¥0.8 billion (0.2%) less than the preceding fiscal year, ronments and order trends.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Press Release
    Press release The ATMEA1 reactor pre-qualified in Argentina Paris, July 12, 2012 The national utility Nucleoeléctrica Argentina (NA-SA) has informed ATMEA that it had pre-qualified the ATMEA1 technology for the next Request For Proposals that will be issued for the construction of its fourth nuclear power plant. By pre-selecting the ATMEA1 technology, NA-SA acknowledges that the ATMEA1 reactor is a qualified design that could meet the most stringent safety requirements and fit needs of the NA-SA. “After Jordan pre-selection of the ATMEA1 design last May and as confirmed by the recent positive statement of the French Safety Authority ASN on the ATMEA1 reactor’s safety options, this NA-SA decision confirms the trust being placed in the ATMEA1 technology. I’m confident that its design will fulfil stringent Argentina’s requirements, with its highest safety level as a Generation III+ reactor, its proven technology and its superior operation performance”, outlined Philippe Namy, ATMEA President. In 2006, Argentina announced the reactivation of a strategic plan for the country’s nuclear power sector, including the construction of a fourth nuclear reactor. The ATMEA1 reactor is a pressurized water reactor of 1,100 MWe, intended for any types of electrical networks and in particular for medium power grids. It was designed and developed by ATMEA, the 50/50 Joint Venture created in 2007 by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and AREVA. Taking support on these two parent companies, ATMEA capitalizes on their experience of about 130 nuclear power plants which are operating in the world for around 50 years, and representing approximately 3300 cumulative reactor years of operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in International Nuclear Markets and Impending Issues for Japan
    Trends in International Nuclear Markets and Impending Issues for Japan Nuclear Renaissance and the U.S.-Japan Alliance: Finding New Markets and Preventing Proliferation The Brookings Institution, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies Hokkaido University, Slavic Research Center October 30, 2009 The Brookings Institution Tatsujiro Suzuki Visiting Professor, Univ. of Tokyo Associate Vice President Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry(CRIEPI) [email protected] Current Status of Global Nuclear Energy • At the April of 2009, 436 nuclear power plants in operation in with a total net installed capacity of 370.2 GW(e) . •~80% of its capacity is in OECD countries • 5 units(3.9GW) in long term shutdown (2006) • 45 units(40 GW) under construction, 25 of which is in Asia(2008) • Supply ~16% of global electricity generation Source: International Atomic Energy Agency.(2009) and Mycle Schneider, Steve Thomas, Antony Froggatt and Doug Koplow, “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009," August 2009. Source: Mycle Schneider et.al “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009,” August 2009. http://www.bmu.de/files/english/pdf/application/pdf/welt_statusbericht_atomindustrie_0908_en_bf.pdf OECD/IEA’s nuclear power growth estimate up to 2030: 416GW~519GW Source: International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM), “Global Fissile Material Report 2007”, p.84. (original data from International Energy Agency, “World Energy Outlook 2006,” p. 362) Global Nuclear Capacity Projection Need for Replacement Orders Source: Mycle Schneider et.al “The World Nuclear Industry Status Report 2009,” August 2009. http://www.bmu.de/files/english/pdf/application/pdf/welt_statusbericht_atomindustrie_0908_en_bf.pdf Global Nuclear Power Scenario to meet Climate Change Challenge (MIT, 2003) Source:MIT Interdisciplinary Study, “The Future of Nuclear Power,” 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Specials Steels and Superalloys for Nuclear Industry
    Specials Steels and Superalloys for Nuclear Industry Enhancing your performance or almost 60 years Aubert & Duval has been a key partner for the development Aubert & Duval: Your partner F of forged and rolled products, especially those customized for the nuclear market. to energize your success With full vertical integration from melting, to remelting, hot converting and machining (rough machining through to near-net-shape parts), Aubert & Duval offers wide-ranging cutting edge capabilities for nuclear application. Equipment Process flow . MELTING Melting furnaces (EAF, AOD, LF) Melting up to 60 tons Vacuum Induction Melting (VIM) HPS NiSA up to 20 tons Remelting furnaces (ESR, VAR) up to 30 tons powder atomization (Gaz, VIM) . FORGING Open-die forging presses Remelting Powder atomization from 1,500 to 10,000 tons Closed-die forging presses from 4,500 to 65,000 tons . ROLLING MILL HPS 7-200 mm diameter bars High Performance Steels: Conversion . HEAT TREATMENT A range of alloyed steels with Solution and ageing furnaces tightly controlled characteristics HPS Ti NiSA AL PM Horizontal and vertical quenching offering optimum value for equipment customers. TESTING Forging Closed-die Hot Isostatic Immersion UT up to 13 tons and/or rolling Forging Forging Pressing (HIP) ©Valinox-Franck Dunouau (28,000 lbs) Automated contact UT up to 20 tons NiSA Aubert & Duval has also put in place over many decades dedicated skills to co-design re-engineered Nickel-base Superalloys: Nickel-based superalloys: materials metallurgical solutions with our clients. keeping high surface integrity while Sales of alloys and superalloys have progressively expanded across a broad spectrum of primary withstanding severe mechanical circuit contractors and their subcontractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements
    INL/EXT-16-38796 Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements Brent Dixon Leilani Beard June 2016 The INL is a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory operated by Battelle Energy Alliance DISCLAIMER This information was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or any agency thereof. INL/EXT-16-38796 Global Nuclear Markets – Market Arrangements and Service Agreements Brent Dixon Leilani Beard June 2016 Idaho National Laboratory Nuclear Systems Design & Analysis Division Idaho Falls, Idaho 83415 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis Under U.S. Department of Energy-Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 Forward The U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Policy and Systems Analysis (EPSA) requested an assessment of global nuclear markets, including the structure of nuclear companies in different countries and the partnerships between reactor vendors and buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Jthomas-CO2-Conferen
    KM CDR Process™ Post-combustion CO2 Capture Technology 26th Annual CO2 Conference December 8, 2020 © MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC. All Rights Reserved. Presentation Outline 1. Introduction to MHI 2. MHI’s KM CDR Process™ Carbon Capture Technology 3. Recent Highlights © MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC. All Rights Reserved. 2 Introduction to MHI © MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC. All Rights Reserved. 3 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Group at a Glance As a global leader in engineering and manufacturing, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Group delivers innovative and integrated solutions across a wide range of industries from commercial aviation and transportation to power plants and gas turbines, and from machinery and infrastructure to integrated defense and space systems. COMPANY HIGHLIGHTS More than $36.7BN 52% Annual revenue 24,600 Sales outside Japan Patents 400+ $1BN 82,728 Domestic & overseas Profit Employees worldwide companies (FY2019 Results @110JPY/$) © MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES AMERICA, INC. All Rights Reserved. 4 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Group Domains MHI GROUP DOMAINS POWER INDUSTRY & AIRCRAFT, SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE DEFENSE & SPACE • Thermal Power Systems • Material Handling Equipment • Commercial Aircraft • Nuclear Energy Systems • Engine & Energy • Mitsubishi SpaceJet • Offshore Wind Power Systems • Turbochargers • Defense Aircraft • Pumps • Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration • Missile Systems • Marine Machinery • Machine Tool • Space Systems • Compressors • Automotive Thermal Systems • Special
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy Systems Business Operation
    Nuclear Energy Systems Business Operation June 3, 2010 Akira Sawa Director, Executive Vice President, General Manager, Nuclear Energy Systems Headquarters 1 Contents 1. Highlights in Corporate News, 2009-2010 2. Results of the 2008 Business Plan 3. Overview of the 2010 Business Plan 4. Operation in Global Business 5. Operation in Domestic Light Water Reactor Business 6. Operation in Nuclear Fuel Cycle Business 7. Value Chain Innovation 2 1. Highlights in Corporate News, 2009-2010 Projects Delivered Realizing Major Projects The latest PWR power plant 3rd US-APWR selected started commercial operation Hokkaido Electric Dominion Resources Tomari unit 3 North Anna unit 3 (Dec 2009) (May 2010) Inheriting plant Plant export starts in technologies Tomari unit 3 (right) earnest Existing North Anna unit 1/2 1st plutonium thermal operation Large-scale order received started in Japan for nuclear fuel cycle Kyushu Electric Japan Nuclear Fuel Genkai unit 3 Limited (Dec 2009) Rokkasho MOX fuel Shikoku Electric fabrication plant Ikata unit 3 (June 2009) (Mar 2010) Genkai No. 3 reactor Rokkasho MOX fuel fabrication plant MOX fuel loaded (J-MOX) Nuclear Fuel Cycle Contribution to Japanese Advanced nuclear fuel cycle 3 2. Results of the 2008 Business Plan Orders, Sales and Profit Steady business mostly in domestic maintenance services, nuclear fuel cycle and components export Major Actions and Achievements Steady business promotion and construction of business foundation towards global deployment Overseas business ○Dominion selected US-APWR, a 1,700MWe class large-sized PWR, the third unit following the 2 units selected by Luminant. ○The basic design of ATMEA1, a 1,100 MWe class mid-sized PWR, completed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Recent Activities of Nuclear Power Globalizationour Provision
    Recent Activities of Nuclear Power Globalization Provisions against Global Warming through the Global Deployment of Technologies as an “Integrated Nuclear Power Plant Supply Company” KIYOSHI YAMAUCHI*1 SHIGEMITSU SUZUKI*1 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI) is striving to expand and spread nuclear power plants as an “Integrated Nuclear Power Plant Supply Company” based on its engineering, manufacturing, and technological support capabilities. The company also has ample experience in the export of major components. MHI is accelerating its global deployment through the market introduction of large-sized strategic reactor US-APWR, the joint development of a mid-sized strategic reactor ATMEA1 with AREVA, and a small strategic reactor PBMR. The company also plans to internationally deploy technologies for the nuclear fuel cycle. We present here the leading-edge trends in the global deployment of these nuclear businesses, all of which help to solve the energy and environmental issues in the world. most effective countermeasures against global warming, 1. Role of nuclear power generation as together with countermeasures to promote energy saving a countermeasure against global warming and new energies. In December 1997, targets were determined for the The CO2 emissions per kWh of energy generated by reduction of greenhouse effect gas during the Conference nuclear power generation are extremely small in comparison on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate to the emissions from thermal power generation with coal Change (COP3) held in Kyoto. About 90% of greenhouse and oil, and from natural energy power generation with effect gas from Japan is energy-derived CO2 generated photovoltaic effects, wind power, and so on (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • JAPAN Roundtable Series: Partners in Nuclear
    SessionSession IIIIII ofof thethe U.S.U.S. -- JAPANJAPAN RoundtableRoundtable Series:Series: PartnersPartners inin NuclearNuclear EnergyEnergy Competitiveness Strategies for Emerging Markets/The U.S.-Japan Private Industry Model vs. State Owned Industry Model February 23, 2011 Kiyoshi Yamauchi Executive Officer Nuclear Headquarters 1 Contents 1. Nuclear Energy As a Key Player 2. Overview of MHI Nuclear 3. U.S.- Japan Cooperation in Emerging Market 4. Closing 2 1. Nuclear Energy As a Key Player 3 Nuclear Energy As a Key Player Growing Needs for Clean & Affordable Energy - Concern About Climate Change Continue - Energy Security - Energy Needs in the Developing World - Proliferation Issues - No Single Winner, No Loser in Energy Portfolio The Role of Nuclear Power - Solution to Cover Spectrum of Needs - Engineering / Technological Advances - Safe, Clean and Economical NPP Development 4 U.S.- Japan Cooperation As a Key Player New Build in US and Japan Efficient and Safe Operation Emerging Market 5 2. Overview of MHI Nuclear 6 Mitsubishi Nuclear Organization Approximately 4,500 employees on a consolidated basis (as of April 2010) MFBR Nuclear Energy Systems U.S.A.：MNES （MITSUBISHI （Mitsubishi Nuclear FBR SYSTEMS, INC.） HQ (Mr. Sawa) Energy Systems, Inc.） (Control/Managing of Nuclear Business) ATMEA.SAS. Kobe Shipyard & Takasago 三菱電機Mitsubishi Machinery Works Machinery Electric 電気設備 (Nuclear Island) Works Corporation (Turbine Island) (Electricalとりまと Equipment) め Mitsubishi Nuclear Nuclear Nuclear Nuclear Takasago Nuclear Fuel Development Plant Power R&D Transport Service Fuel Co., Corporation Training Center Ltd. System Co., Engineering Center, Ltd. Ltd. Co., Ltd. 7 Kobe Shipyard & Machinery Works Established : 1905 Employees : 3,900 (For Nuclear Division: 1,700) Kobe Engineering Land Area Center 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vendre Aux Donneurs D'ordres Aéronautiques
    VENDRE AUX DONNEURS D’ORDRES AÉRONAUTIQUES JAPONAIS Rencontrez sans vous déplacer les acheteurs japonais Positionnez-vous sur le marché aéronautique le plus important, internationalisé et expérimenté en Asie et proposez en visioconférence vos solutions innovantes à des acteurs incontournables du marché aéronautique japonais : Kawasaki Heavy Industries, IHI, Subaru Aerospace, NIPPI, JAPAN AEROSPACE Donneurs d’ordres participants : KAWASAKI Heavy Industries, IHI, SUBARU Aerospace Company, NIPPI, JAPAN AEROSPACE Rendez-vous en visioconférence sur sélection Entre mi-novembre et fin décembre 2020 Portée par Business France, les Chambres de Commerce et d’Industrie, et Bpifrance, Team France Export concentre les meilleures solutions du public et du privé pour faciliter et accélérer votre développement à l’international. À chaque étape de votre projet export, vous bénéficiez des leviers adaptés à votre stratégie, à vos ambitions et à vos moyens. Cet évènement vous est proposé dans le cadre du programme annuel France Export soutenu par l’État. FOCUS MARCHÉ ➢ La taille du marché de l’aérospatial au Japon s'élève à 18 Mds EUR. ➢ Le pays est par ailleurs un importateur net de l’UE avec environ 1,87 Mds EUR par an d’équipements achetés auprès des avionneurs et fournisseurs européens. Ce chiffre coïncide avec la volonté implicite du secteur à réduire sa dépendance vis- à-vis des donneurs d’ordres américains. ➢ La filière japonaise, notamment via ses donneurs d’ordres dits « heavy industries » (Mitsubishi, Kawasaki, Subaru, IHI), se place comme un fournisseur de rang 1 majeur et partenaire associé au risque de Boeing. Elle fournit par exemple 35% du Boeing 787 et 21% du futur 777X.
    [Show full text]
  • AREVA in 2007, Growth and Profitability
    AREVA in 2007, growth and profi tability AREVA 33, rue La Fayette – 75009 Paris – France Tel.: +33 1 34 96 00 00 – Fax: +33 1 34 96 00 01 www.areva.com Energy is our future, don’t waste it! ACTIVITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT REPORT If you only have a moment to devote to this report, read this. Our energies have a future. A future without CO 2 OUR MISSION no.1 worldwide Enable everyone to have access to ever cleaner, safer and more economical energy. in the entire nuclear cycle OUR STRATEGY To set the standard in CO 2-free power generation and electricity transmission and distribution. no.3 worldwide I Capitalize on our integrated business model to spearhead in electricity transmission and distribution the nuclear revival: – build one third of new nuclear generating capacities; – make the fuel secure for our current and future customers. I Ensure strong and profi table growth in T&D. OUR PERFORMANCE IN 2007 I Expand our renewable energies offering. Backlog With manufacturing facilities in 43 countries and a sales network in more than 100, e +55.4% AREVA offers customers reliable technological solutions for CO 2-free power generation and 39.83 B electricity transmission and distribution. We are the world leader in nuclear power and the only company to cover all industrial activities in this fi eld. Sales Our 65,000 employees are committed to continuous improvement on a daily basis, making sustainable development the focal point of the group’s industrial strategy. e11.92 B +9.8 % AREVA’s businesses help meet the 21 st century’s greatest challenges: making energy available to all, protecting the planet, and acting responsibly towards future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mhi Report 2020 Financial Section Impairment Loss
    MHI REPORT 2020 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES GROUP FINANCIAL SECTION For the Year Ended March 31, MHI REPORT 2020 FINANCIAL SECTION For the Year Ended March 31, 2020 SEGMENT INFORMATION Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Consolidated Subsidiaries Fiscal years ended March 31, 2019 and 2020 REVENUE Thousands of Millions of yen U.S. dollars Billions of yen 5,000 Industry Segment 2019 2020 2020 Power Systems ¥1,525,108 ¥1,590,293 $14,612,634 4,000 Industry & Infrastructure 1,907,871 1,778,095 16,338,279 Power Systems Aircraft, Defense & Space 677,577 704,985 6,477,855 3,000 Others 71,661 75,190 690,894 2,000 Industry & Subtotal 4,182,218 4,148,565 38,119,682 Infrastructure 1,000 Eliminations or Corporate (103,874) (107,189) (984,921) Aircraft, Defense & Space Total ¥4,078,344 ¥4,041,376 $37,134,760 0 2019 2020 Others, Eliminations or Corporate PROFIT FROM BUSINESS ACTIVITIES Thousands of Millions of yen U.S. dollars Billions of yen Industry Segment 2019 2020 2020 240 Power Systems ¥133,196 ¥144,383 $1,326,683 Power Systems Industry & Infrastructure 70,753 54,883 504,300 120 Aircraft, Defense & Space (28,230) (208,792) (1,918,515) Industry & Infrastructure 0 Others 39,156 6,565 60,323 Aircraft, Defense Subtotal 214,876 (2,958) (27,180) & Space -120 Eliminations or Corporate (14,305) (26,579) (244,224) Others, Eliminations Total ¥200,570 ¥ (29,538) $ (271,414) or Corporate -240 2019 2020 DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION Thousands of Millions of yen U.S. dollars Industry Segment 2019 2020 2020 Power Systems ¥ 42,861 ¥ 47,085 $ 432,647 Industry & Infrastructure 51,187 57,015 523,890 Aircraft, Defense & Space 29,982 27,082 248,846 Others 6,263 1,970 18,101 Subtotal 130,294 133,154 1,223,504 Corporate 5,364 11,485 105,531 Total ¥135,658 ¥144,639 $1,329,036 1 MHI REPORT 2020 FINANCIAL SECTION IMPAIRMENT LOSS Thousands of Millions of yen U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • World Investment Report 2014
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT WORLD INVESTMENT REPORT 2014 INVESTING IN THE SDGs: AN ACTION PLAN New York and Geneva, 2014 ii World Investment Report 2014: Investing in the SDGs: An Action Plan NOTE The Division on Investment and Enterprise of UNCTAD is a global centre of excellence, dealing with issues related to investment and enterprise development in the United Nations System. It builds on four decades of experience and international expertise in research and policy analysis, intergovernmental consensus- building, and provides technical assistance to over 150 countries. The terms country/economy as used in this Report also refer, as appropriate, to territories or areas; the designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In addition, the designations of country groups are intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage of development reached by a particular country or area in the development process. The major country groupings used in this Report follow the classification of the United Nations Statistical Office. These are: Developed countries: the member countries of the OECD (other than Chile, Mexico, the Republic of Korea and Turkey), plus the new European Union member countries which are not OECD members (Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta and Romania), plus Andorra, Bermuda, Liechtenstein, Monaco and San Marino.
    [Show full text]