DOCSLIB.ORG

Programs in Nepal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Programs in Nepal Programmatic Evaluation of Search for Common Ground (SFCG) Programs in Nepal Report Submitted to Search For Common Ground Lazimpat, Kathmandu Report Submitted by Tulasi R. Nepal, Consultant Sagun Basnet, Consultant Prakash Bhattarai, Consultant Shiva K. Dhungana, SFCG, Nepal September, 2010 Acronyms AFN Antenna Foundation Nepal ARD ARD Inc. CA Constituent Assembly CAAC Children Affected by Armed Conflict CAFAAG Children involved in Armed Conflict and Armed Group CFUG Community Forestry Users’Groups COE Criteria of Effectiveness CPN Communist Party of Nepal DDC District Development Committee DM&E Design, Monitoring and Evaluation FD Farakilo Dharti KD Khulla Dharti FGD Focused Group Discussion FM Frequency Modulation FMDC Far-west Media Development Centre HRPLSC Human Rights Protection and Legal Service Centre KII Key Informant Interview LDM Local Decision Makers LPCs Local Peace Committees NED National Endowment Fund for Democracy NGO Non-Governmental Organization NW New World PSAs Public Service Announcements PWL Peace Writ Large R4PB Radio for Peacebuilding RPP Reflecting on Peace Practice SB Sunou Bolou SFCG Search for Common Ground TOC Theory of Change UNIFEM UN Fund for Women VDC Village Development Committee WOREC Women Rehabilitation Centre YLT Youth Leadership Training YN Youth Network ii Acknowledgements On behalf of the evaluation team, I thank those who took part in the evaluation process as participants and provided information to our queries during our visits and interviews. Without their generosity, our evaluation would not have been completed. Thanks are due to the SFCG Nepal program team for availing us this opportunity. Sincere thanks goes to Serena Rix Tripathee, Country Director, and SFCG Nepal for important feedbacks and challenging questions. Rajendra Mulmi, Director of Programs deserves earnest thanks for his ever-willingness to support and amazing togetherness compounded by ideas to complete this evaluation. In fact, their encouraging gestures and words have always incredibly bolstered our work and motivation. I would like to extend my team’s best appreciation to Design Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist of SFCG, Shiva K. Dhungana for his constant involvement through the evaluation design, field visit and report writing. His guidance, motivation and support have been instrumental for the completion of this task. The SFCG staff, Community Peacebuilding team, Media team and also the Finance team at the centre as well as in the field has been very much cooperative and willing to arrange our visits, interviews and meetings. Their open and honest opinions on the topics of evaluation have given us so much. Similarly, the members of the Youth Networks and the youth clubs; and the staff members of the NGO partners have also made this evaluation possible with their positive support for arranging the meetings and visits on one hand, and their honest opinion about the situation on the other. I would like to acknowledge the hard work that Sagun, one of the evaluation team members, have put and also her extra efforts to finish the report on time by coordinating among us. Her sense of belongingness to this work is praiseworthy. Similarly, I also extend my thanks to another team member Prakash, for his hard work and ever smiling gestures and positivity even in difficult times during the field trips. Last, but not least, we also acknowledge the efforts put by the support staff of SFCG Nepal and all other known, unknown individuals who have helped bring the evaluation to a reporting format. Tulasi R Nepal Evaluation Team Leader iii Table of Contents Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 10 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 10 1.4 CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................... 15 1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2 Evaluation Design ....................................................................................................... 19 2.1 EVALUATION FRAMEWORK ...................................................................................... 19 2.2 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 21 2.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE EVALUATION....................................................................... 22 Chapter 3 Program Effectiveness ............................................................................................... 23 3.1 STRATEGIC GOAL AND OBJECTIVES ...................................................................... 23 3.2 PROGRAM APPROACH ................................................................................................. 28 3.3 OUTPUTS AND DELIVERABLES ................................................................................. 28 3.3.1 Capacity Building .......................................................................................................... 29 3.3.2 Media Programming ...................................................................................................... 32 3.3.3 Support to Community Peacebuilding ........................................................................... 34 3.4 PARTNERSHIPS ............................................................................................................... 38 3.4.1 Observations on Partnership ...................................................................................... 38 3.4.2 The Synergy between Partner’s programs ..................................................................... 44 3.5 SUSTAINABILITY ............................................................................................................ 44 3.6 ATTRIBUTION .................................................................................................................. 45 Chapter 4 Peace Effectiveness ..................................................................................................... 46 iv 4.1 CRITERIA OF EFFECTIVENESS .................................................................................. 46 4.1.1 Creation of reform of institutions of mechanisms ......................................................... 46 4.1.2 Independent peace initiatives that decrease dividers and increase connectors ............ 47 4.1.3 Resistance to violence and provocations to violence .................................................... 48 4.1.4 Increase in People's Security and Sense of Security ...................................................... 49 4.1.5 Meaningful improvement in inter-group relations ........................................................ 50 4.2 STRATEGIC LINKAGES ................................................................................................ 51 4.3 UNINTENDED IMPACTS ................................................................................................ 55 Chapter 5 Theory of Change Effectiveness ................................................................................ 56 Chapter 6 Key Findings ............................................................................................................... 66 6.1 PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS ....................................................................................... 66 6.2 PEACE EFFECTIVENESS ............................................................................................... 69 6.3 THEORY OF CHANGE EFFECTIVENESS .................................................................. 71 Chapter 7 Challenges and Recommendations ........................................................................... 73 7.1 Challenges ........................................................................................................................... 73 7.2 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 75 Chapter 8 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 80 Annexes.......................................................................................................................................... 82 Annex 1: ToR for Evaluation .................................................................................................. 82 Evaluator’s Role ....................................................................................................................... 89 Annex 2: Field Visit Schedule .................................................................................................. 91 Annex 3: People met and interviewed .................................................................................... 94 Annex 4: Checklist Questionnaire .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nepali Times Industry
    JOYRIDE#204 9 - 15 July 2004 20 pages Rs 25 Can Deuba keep the car on the road? KUNDA DIXIT Adhikary sees it as a way to get around Maoist objections, and veryone in the new Deuba government agrees perhaps even a Eon the need to restore peace and hold elections, way to bring the they just dont agree on how to go about it. rebels to the Some want a unilateral ceasefire to pressure the negotiating table. Maoists to come to the negotiating table, others say But such a move it wont work. is sure to be opposed Peace activists have been lobbying for a ceasefire, by the army. One even if talks are not possible. They say this would close Deuba aide allow the government to address the urgent told us: Its not development and rehabilitation needs of the people. going to happen. Prime Minister Deuba has to accommodate a We dont want money to divergence of views and vested interests among the reach the Maoists. The four parties and royal nominees in his coalition. It is prime minister prefers an all- clear that on security matters, he needs the armys party presence in local bodies so that nod. One party insider told us: We have ministers the budget can be spent on development, who will all be on mobiles reporting back to their he said. bosses. Its going to be tricky. However, there are questions about The cabinets first real test is next weeks budget. whether village councils can function at a time when Already, there are signs that the UML and Deubas the Maoists have been assassinating mayors and NC-D are pulling in different directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Human Rights Year Book 2021 (ENGLISH EDITION) (This Report Covers the Period - January to December 2020)
    Nepal Human Rights Year Book 2021 (ENGLISH EDITION) (This Report Covers the Period - January to December 2020) Editor-In-Chief Shree Ram Bajagain Editor Aarya Adhikari Editorial Team Govinda Prasad Tripathee Ramesh Prasad Timalsina Data Analyst Anuj KC Cover/Graphic Designer Gita Mali For Human Rights and Social Justice Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) Nagarjun Municipality-10, Syuchatar, Kathmandu POBox : 2726, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: +977-1-5218770 Fax:+977-1-5218251 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.insec.org.np; www.inseconline.org All materials published in this book may be used with due acknowledgement. First Edition 1000 Copies February 19, 2021 © Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) ISBN: 978-9937-9239-5-8 Printed at Dream Graphic Press Kathmandu Contents Acknowledgement Acronyms and Abbreviations Foreword CHAPTERS Chapter 1 Situation of Human Rights in 2020: Overall Assessment Accountability Towards Commitment 1 Review of the Social and Political Issues Raised in the Last 29 Years of Nepal Human Rights Year Book 25 Chapter 2 State and Human Rights Chapter 2.1 Judiciary 37 Chapter 2.2 Executive 47 Chapter 2.3 Legislature 57 Chapter 3 Study Report 3.1 Status of Implementation of the Labor Act at Tea Gardens of Province 1 69 3.2 Witchcraft, an Evil Practice: Continuation of Violence against Women 73 3.3 Natural Disasters in Sindhupalchok and Their Effects on Economic and Social Rights 78 3.4 Problems and Challenges of Sugarcane Farmers 82 3.5 Child Marriage and Violations of Child Rights in Karnali Province 88 36 Socio-economic
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECT Component Review
    CONNECT component review CONNECT component review Date: 4 May 2020 Authors: Gordon Freer and Edward Hedley Submitted by Itad Itad 4 May 2020 CONNECT component review Acknowledgements The review team acknowledges the support of the Connect programme team in providing documentation and helping the team to arrange interviews. The review team also expresses thanks to our field team in conducting interviews and collecting data in the field. Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the evaluators. They do not represent those of Connect or of any of the individuals and other organisations referred to in the report. ‘Itad’ and the tri-colour triangles icon are a registered trademark of ITAD Limited. Itad 4 May 2020 i CONNECT component review Contents List of acronyms iii 1. Introduction and scope 1 1.1. CONNECT component background 1 1.2. Review purpose 1 1.3. Review methodology 1 1.4. Review limitations 2 1.5. Structure of the report 2 2. Theoretical framework Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.1. The M4P Theory of Change 3 2.2. The CONNECT Theory of Change 4 2.3. Intervention Theories of Change 5 2.4. Commentary on intervention design 6 3. Findings 8 3.1. Relevance 8 3.2. Effectiveness: were the interventions effective in promoting changes to practice? 11 3.3. Impact: did the changes have value for the beneficiaries? 13 3.4. Sustainability: Are the changes likely to be implemented in the future? 15 4. Conclusion 18 5. Lessons and recommendations 19 List of references 21 Table of respondents 22 Annex A: Case study – Belpata Dairy
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    Backward Society Education (BASE) Annual Report 2016 Central Project Office Tulsipur-6, Rajaura Dang Phone: +977-82-520055, 522212 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nepalbase.org 1 Table of Contents Page Backward Society Education (BASE)...................................................................................... 05 BASE Evolving Complexity.................................................................................................... 06 Projects: 1. Sangai Sikaun Sangai Badhaun (SSSB)..................................................................... 10 2. Early Grade Reading Program (EGRP)..................................................................... 12 3. Literacy Program.................................................................................................... 13 4. Enhancing Quality and Relevant of Learning for Adolescent Girls........................ 16 5. Sajhedari Bikaas (Governance)............................................................................. 17 6. WORTH.................................................................................................................. 19 7. Enhancing health status among freed bonded labour community Through WASH services....................................................................................... 21 8. National Rural and Renewable Energy Program (NRREP).................................... 23 9. South Asia Sub-regional Economic Cooperation (SASEC).................................... 26 10. Initiative for Agricultural Productivity and
    [Show full text]
  • PAHAL) Program
    Promoting Agriculture, Health and Alternative Livelihoods (PAHAL) Program Cooperative Agreement No.: AID-OAA-15-00001 Quarterly Report III (Q3, FY15) 1 April – 30 June, 2015 Submitted to: USAID Nepal Submitted by: Mercy Corps ACRONYMS COP – Chief of Party DCOP – Deputy Chief of Party GESI – Gender and Social Inclusion GoN – Government of Nepal iDE – International Development Enterprises innovATE – Innovation for Agricultural training and Education IPTT – Indicator Performance Tracking Table KISAN – Knowledge-based Integrated Sustainable Agriculture and Nutrition MC – Mercy Corps MoAD – Ministry of Agricultural Development MoFALD – Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MoHA – Ministry of Home Affairs MoHP – Ministry of Health and Population NGO – Non-Governmental Organization NNFSS – National Nutrition and Food Security Secretariat NPAC – National Advisory Committee Meeting NPC – National Planning Council PAHAL – Promoting Agriculture, Health and Alternative Livelihoods SABAL – Sustainable action for Resilience and Food Security STRESS – Strategic Resilience Assessment SUAAHARA – ‘Good Nutrition’ TSU – Technical Support Unit (Mercy Corps) VDC – Village Development Committee PAHAL Program Overview The PAHAL Program, funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development’s Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance (DCHA)/Office of Food for Peace (FFP), is a five-year program that commenced in October, 2014. It seeks to strengthen livelihoods, improve nutritional status and increase the capacity of vulnerable households to mitigate, adapt to and recover from shocks and stresses in communities with deep poverty and high rates of malnutrition in critical zones of the Far-Western and Mid-Western Regions of Nepal. In recent years Nepal has made substantial strides toward reducing its overall poverty rate. However, many people in the Middle Hill and Mountain zones of western Nepal continue to struggle with the root causes of food insecurity.
    [Show full text]
  • National Services Policy Review: Nepal
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT NATIONAL SERVICES POLICY REVIEW NEPAL New York and Geneva, 2011 ii NATIONAL SERVICES POLICY REVIEW OF NEPAL NOTE The symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The views expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Secretariat. The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Secretariat concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or regarding its economic system or degree of development. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a reference to the document number. A copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat, Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. For further information on the Trade Negotiations and Commercial Diplomacy Branch and its activities, please contact: Ms. Mina MASHAYEKHI Head, Trade Negotiations and Commercial Diplomacy Branch Division of International Trade in Goods and Services, and Commodities Tel: +41 22 917 56 40 Fax: +41 22 917 00 44 E-mail: [email protected] www.unctad.org/tradenegotiations UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/2010/3 Copyright © United Nations, 2011 All rights reserved. Printed in Switzerland FOREWORD iii FOREWORD For many years, UNCTAD has been emphasising the importance of developing countries strengthening and diversifying their services sector.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Factors of Student Learning Achievements and Dynamics for Better Learning Conditions: a Case Study Focused to Grade Five in Some Selected Schools
    A Study on Factors of Student Learning Achievements and Dynamics for Better Learning Conditions: A case study focused to grade five in some selected schools Submitted to Department of Education, Ministry of Education Presented by Rural Development Society, Chabahil &Molung Foundation, Koteshwor, Kathmandu 2074 Research Team Rishi Ram Rijal, Ph. D., Team Leader Netra Prasad Paudel, Ph. D., Senior Researcher Santosh Gautam, Data Analyst Shyam Krishna Bista, Researcher Drona Dahal, Researcher Tirtha Raj Khatiwada, Researcher Karna Bahadur Chongbang, Researcher English Mahasaraswati S. School (High) Banedhungra L.S. School(Low) Nepali Sarada H.S. School (High) Sarada L.S.School (Low) Nepali Samaijee S. School (High) Siddhartha L. S. School (Low) English Kalika H.S. School (High) Maths Bhanudaya S.School (Low) Saraswati L.S. School (High) Nepal Rastriya S. School,(Low) Maths Nepaltar S. School(Low) Diyalo L.S. School(High) 3 Acknowledgements This case study report has been prepared to fulfill the requirements of research project of 2017 approved by the Department of Education under the Ministry of Education. Without the contribution made by several including Director General of DOE, under secretaries, other personnel of DOE, DEOs, SSs, RPs, head teachers, teachers, chairpersons of SMCs and PTAs of the sample schools along with the staff of consultancy office, it would not have been possible to accomplish this outcome. So, we would like to acknowledge them all here. First of all, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to the authority concerned for providing the opportunity to undertake this research to Rural Development Society, Chabahil, Kathmandu and Molung Foundation, Koteshwor, Kathmandu.
    [Show full text]
  • Page Situation Report 2: Nepal Flood – Saptari District (18July 2019)
    Situation Report 2: Nepal Flood – Saptari District (18 July 2019) Assessment conducted jointly by DCA and Koshi Victim Society (KVS). Data gathered from 11 July 2019 with assessment completed on 16, 17 and 18 July 2019. This report is produced by DCA Nepal, based on field assessment of affected municipalities, and additional meetings held with humanitarian agencies, local NGOs, and government officials. Summary » Floods caused by heavy rainfall in Nepal have been resulting in 90 dead, 29 missing, and 41 injured (Ministry of Home Affairs, 18 July). Properties, rice crops and livelihoods have also been lost. » Flood water has inundated thousands of houses along the high raised road and embankment areas, leaving at least 11,839 households temporarily displaced (UN Sit Rep – July 18, 2019). » The District Disaster Management Committee (DDMC) report shows that 13 of 18 municipalities in Saptari district are affected by floods and water logging, of which five are rural municipalities. » According to the Nepal Red Cross Society (NRCS), Saptari district is assessed to be one of the most hard- hit areas. No fatalities have been recorded yet. » DCA as a District Lead Support Agency (DLSA) of Saptari district, is supporting in enhancing coordination among aid agencies and government bodies as well as facilitating information sharing about flood adversities. 1 | P a g e Situation Overview On 17 July, the District Disaster Management Committee (DDMC), Saptari reported that 4,500 houses were affected by floodwater. Of these, 1,500 houses are severely damaged. DDMC has recommended that relief agencies go directly to the affected municipalities and coordinate with Local Government for relief distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Environmental Conditions
    Draft EIA Report of the Sunsari River Irrigation Project Existing Environmental Conditions CHAPTER EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 3. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS This chapter documents existing environmental conditions, particularly in the areas of physical, biological, socio-economic and cultural resources in relation to the Project activities. 3.1. Physical Environment 3.1.1. Topography and Climate The Sunsari River Irrigation Project (SRIP) area is located in the south-western part of the Sunsari District located between 26°24′N to 26°30′N in latitude and 87°04′E to 87°12′E in longitude. The elevation ranges from 64 meters to 80 meters above the mean sea level. The study area is rectangular in shape with E-W width varying from 4 to 8 kilometres and N-S length of about 22 kilometres. The western and southern part of the project area is bordered with India. The Project area is located at the eastern bank of the Sapta Koshi River. The terrain starts from foothills of the Siwalik range and slopes gently down to south with an inclination of 5 degrees on an average and is formed by alluvium of old and present rivers. The Project area is dominated by sandy soils having low to moderate water holding capacity. The climate in the project area is sub-tropical. Temperatures are high between March and October, the hottest month being the April, during which the mean daily maximum temperature is about 340C. During the cool period from November to February, mean monthly temperatures are in the range of 16 to 220C. The annual average rainfall between 1970 and 1993 was 1,867mm, raining intensively in the monsoon period, from late May to September.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT.Pdf
    Government of Nepal Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development Ilam Municipality Ilam Preparation of GIS based Digital Base Urban Map Upgrade of Ilam Municipality, Ilam Final Report Submitted By: JV Grid Consultant Pvt. Ltd, Galaxy Pvt. Ltd and ECN Consultancy Pvt. Ltd June 2017 Government of Nepal Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development Ilam Municipality Ilam Preparation of GIS based Digital Base Urban Map Upgrade of Ilam Municipality, Ilam Final Report MUNICIPALITY PROFILE Submitted By: JV Grid Consultant Pvt. Ltd, Galaxy Pvt. Ltd and ECN Consultancy Pvt. Ltd June 2017 Table of Content Contents Page No. CHAPTER - I ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 NAMING AND ORIGIN............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 LOCATION.............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 SETTLEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS ......................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER - II.................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 PHYSIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................................4 2.2 GEOLOGY/GEOMORPHOLOGY
    [Show full text]
  • Netritwa”, Was a One-Year Pilot Project Funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) Imple- Mented in Siraha District from April 2016 to March 2017
    1 2 dlxnf g]t[Tj Political Empowerment of Women in the Terai Good practices to promote women’s leadership and political participation 3 dlxnf g]t[Tj Political Empowerment of Women in the Terai Editor: Pallav Ranjan Project Manager: Meena Sharma Research: Rasani Shrestha Photos: Search stock Published by Search for Common Ground. Copyright 2017. All rights reserved. The content here may not be copied, translated, stored, lent, or otherwise circulated using any forms or means (photo- copying, scanning, recording or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the copyright holder. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of Search for Common Ground or affiliated organizations. Search for Common Ground Nepal Nursery Marg, Lazimpat Kathmandu 44616, Nepal Phone: 977-1-4002010 Email: [email protected] Web: https://www.sfcg.org/Nepal Manufactured in Kathmandu ISBN: 978-9937-0-1734-3 4 Opening words A transformative program for Nepali women’s leader- ship – “Netritwa”, was a one-year pilot project funded by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) imple- mented in Siraha district from April 2016 to March 2017. The project strengthened women’s leadership skills and their participation in political processes and engaged men in enabling women’s political participation. It contributed to create a conducive environment for women’s political par- ticipation. The project was able to empower women on their rights which led to more access for local women to govern- ment services and entitlements. In addition to having a say in the decision making process, these women are collectively raising their voices and issues through their own networks.
    [Show full text]