DOCSLIB.ORG

A N N U a L S U R V E Y O F V I O L a T I O N S O F T R a D E U N I O N R I G H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A N N U a L S U R V E Y O F V I O L a T I O N S O F T R a D E U N I O N R I G H ICFTU INTERNATIONAL CONFEDERATION OF FREE TRADE UNIONS annual survey of violations of ➔trade union rights The violations of trade union rights reported in this survey took place in 1999. The survey was written by Kathryn Hodder of the ICFTU Trade Union Rights Department. ICFTU Boulevard du Roi Albert II, 5, bte 1, B-1210 Brussels - Belgium Tel. 32-2-224.02.11 - Fax 32-2-201.58.15 E-mail: [email protected] - website: www.icftu.org ICFTU annual survey OF VIOLATIONS OF TRADE UNION RIGHTS 2000 Contents 0 FOREWORD 5 ASIA 89 Introduction 92 Australia EIGHT ILO CORE 94 Bangladesh LABOUR 97 Burma STANDARDS 6 98 Cambodia 100 China STATISTICAL 105 Fiji ANALYSIS 7 106 Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China AFRICA 13 Introduction 109 India 16 Botswana 110 Indonesia 16 Burkina Faso 114 Japan 17 Cameroon 115 Korea (North) 18 Cape Verde 115 Korea (South) 19 Central African Republic 118 Laos 20 Democratic Republic of Congo 119 Malaysia 21 Djibouti 121 Nepal 22 Egypt 122 New Zealand 23 Equatorial Guinea 123 Pakistan 24 Eritrea 125 Papua New Guinea 24 Ethiopia 126 Philippines 25 Gabon 128 Singapore 26 Ghana 129 Sri Lanka 27 Kenya 130 Taiwan 28 Lesotho 131 Thailand 29 Libya 133 Turkey 29 Madagascar 135 Vietnam 30 Mauritius 31 Morocco EUROPE 139 Introduction 32 Namibia 142 Belarus 33 Niger 144 Belgium 34 Nigeria 144 Bulgaria 36 Senegal 146 Croatia 36 South Africa 147 Czech Republic 37 Sudan 148 Estonia 38 Swaziland 148 Georgia 40 Tanzania 149 Germany 41 Togo 149 Hungary 42 Tunisia 150 Kosovo 43 Uganda 151 Malta 44 Zimbabwe 153 Norway 154 Poland AMERICAS 49 Introduction 154 Romania 52 Argentina 156 Russian Federation 53 Bolivia 159 Serbia 54 Brazil 160 Slovakia 55 Canada 160 Switzerland 57 Chile 161 Ukraine 57 Colombia 162 United Kingdom 62 Costa Rica 64 Cuba MIDDLE EAST 165 Introduction 65 Dominican Republic 168 Bahrain 65 Ecuador 169 Iran 67 El Salvador 170 Iraq 68 Guatemala 170 Israel 72 Guyana 171 Jordan 72 Haiti 172 Kuwait 73 Honduras 173 Lebanon 74 Mexico 174 Oman 77 Nicaragua 175 Qatar 79 Panama 175 Saudi Arabia 79 Paraguay 176 Syria 80 Peru 177 United Arab Emirates 82 Trinidad and Tobago 177 West Bank and Gaza 83 United States of America 178 Yemen 87 Venezuela APPENDICES 180 ILO complaints 188 ILO conventions 87 & 98 ICFTU annual survey OF VIOLATIONS OF TRADE UNION RIGHTS 2000 Foreword 0 Much has been said about the need to include a social dimension into the globalisation process. In meeting after meeting, governments, representatives from international institutions, even employers, talk about how important "social inclusion" is. Yet, there is often a gap between words and deeds. At this June's UN meeting on the follow-up to the 1995 Copenhagen Social Summit, to cite one example, references to workers' fundamental rights as an indispensable pillar of social policy were watered down and the fierce opposition of a few hard-line countries (which figure prominently in this report for their poor performance on trade union rights) was sufficient to suppress any hope of seeing the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work included in the final document. In fact, until today, there has never been such global acknowledgement of the need to take civil society and the social aspects of the economic process into account. But when it comes to protecting those women and men whose role it is to promote and defend workers' basic rights, little has improved. This year's annual survey cites workers' rights abuses in 113 countries. 140 trade unionists have been murdered in the twelve month period it covers, and hundreds have been beaten up, arrested, jailed and tortured for doing no more than carrying out trade union activities. Demanding payment of wage arrears, calling for improved working conditions, asking for dialogue and for negotiations, campaigning for welfare, for education and for a fair share of income. These are the only "crimes" that have led to people being killed or thrown in jail. This year's report gives us an opportunity to denounce the prevailing hypocrisy which sees government officials parading at international gatherings, ostensibly promoting basic rights, while those who actually defend them at home are being harassed, attacked, threatened, sidelined and silenced - sometimes for ever. Trade union rights are human rights. They form the very basis on which social justice can be built. It is high time that those who claim to lead the world, and actually should, fully integrate this in their day to day practices. Some of the heroes of this report are no longer with us. Their unflinching commitment will continue to inspire us and generations of trade unionists. The fight will go on. General Secretary ICFTU annual survey OF VIOLATIONS OF TRADE UNION RIGHTS 2000 6 The eight core labour standards of the ILO (International Labour Organisation) It is indicated in the text whether a country has ratified the following conven- tions: • No. 29 Forced or Compulsory Labour (1930) • No. 87 Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise (1948) • No. 98 Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining (1949) • No. 100 Equal Remuneration for Work of Equal Value (1951) • No. 105 Abolition of Forced Labour (1957) • No. 111 Discrimination in Employment and Occupation (1958) • No. 138 Minimum Age for Employment (1973) • No. 182 Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention (1999) ICFTU annual survey OF VIOLATIONS OF TRADE UNION RIGHTS 2000 0 Violations of trade union rights: statistical analysis Violations of trade union rights remain at least as frequent as in the past few years. In 1999, 140 people lost their lives, 17 more than in the previous year. The anti-union climate has been on the increase over the years and workers’ rights are being steadily whittled away. International conventions on trade union rights, to which a growing number of States have signed up, are paradoxically being respected less and less. Every year, new countries appear in the survey. The cases reported in it are a stark illustration of this negative trend and only represent the tip of the iceberg of daily violations of fundamental trade union rights. The ICFTU’s information is based on reports from affiliates, international trade secretariats, regional organisations, human rights organisations and the media. The statistics given below are only based therefore on a partial view of the trade union situation in the world. Trade unions in the Middle East, for example, are in most cases banned outright, or are closely controlled by the authorities. The workers are subject to massive rights abuses but very little concrete information can be obtained from these countries. The figures should therefore be treated with caution. The survey does however reflect a certain situation that the statistics below seem to confirm. For example, in over 10% of the countries analysed, trade unionists have died. In nearly one in three countries, trade unionists were wounded, while unfair dismissals following trade union activities took place in nearly 40% of countries. The government interfered in trade union affairs in at least one country in four. Obstacles to the functioning or formation of a trade union can be found in nearly 90% of the countries examined. A. DEATHS AND ASSASSINATIONS 1. Total per region 100 90 . Europe: 9 80 . Africa: 2 60 Middle East: . 0 39 40 Asia and the Pacific: . 39 20 9 Americas: . 90 2 0 Total: . 140 Europe Asia and the Pacific Africa Americas 2. Distribution by region of countries 15.40% where trade unionists died 7.70% Europe: . 15.40% 0% Africa: . 7.70% 53.80% Middle East: . 0% 23.10% Asia and the Pacific: . 23.10% Americas: . 53.80% Europe Asia and the Pacific Africa Americas Middle East Total no. of countries: . 13 ICFTU annual survey OF VIOLATIONS OF TRADE UNION RIGHTS 2000 8 B. BEATINGS AND TORTURE 1. Total per region 800 728 . 700 Europe: 86 583 600 Africa: . 148 500 400 Middle East: . 0 300 . 200 148 Asia and the Pacific: 583 86 100 . Americas: 728 0 Total . 1545 Europe Asia and the Pacific Africa Americas 2. Distribution by region of countries where trade unionists were beaten 13.90% 33.30% or tortured . Europe: 13.90% 22.20% Africa: . 22.20% 0% Middle East: . 0% 30.60% Asie & Pacifique: . 30.60% Europe Asia and the Pacific Americas: . 33.30% Africa Americas Middle East Total no. of countries: . 34 C. ARRESTS AND DETENTIONS 1. Total per region 2500 Europe: . 48 2023 2000 Africa: . 254 1500 Middle East: . 51 1000 Asia and the Pacific: . 566 566 500 254 Americas: . 2023 48 51 0 Total . 2942 Europe Asia and the Pacific Africa Americas Middle East 2. Distribution by region of countries 6.25% where trade unionists were 25% arrested or detained 31.25% Europe: . 6.25% Africa: . 31.25% Middle East: . 6.25% 31.25% 6.25% Asie & Pacifique: . 31.25% Europe Asia and the Pacific Americas: . 25% Africa Americas Middle East Total no. of countries: . 32 ICFTU annual survey OF VIOLATIONS OF TRADE UNION RIGHTS 2000 0 D. STRIKES AND DEMONSTRATIONS REPRESSED 1. Total per region 70 62 Europe: . 15 60 50 Africa: . 27 40 34 Middle East: . 1 30 27 20 15 . Asia and the Pacific: 34 10 1 Americas: . 62 0 Total: . 139 Europe Asia and the Pacific Africa Americas Middle East 2. Distribution by region of countries where strikes and demonstrations 14.60% 33.30% were repressed Europe: . 14.60% Africa: . 31.20% 31.20% . Middle East: 2.10% 18.80% 2.10% Asie & Pocéanie: . 18.80% Europe Asia and the Pacific Americas: . 33.30% Africa Americas Middle East Total no. of countries: .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DA 1/2015 in the Matter Between: HOSPERSA OBO TS TSHAMBI
    IN THE LABOUR APPEAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN Reportable Case no: DA 1/2015 In the matter between: HOSPERSA OBO TS TSHAMBI Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, KWAZULU –NATAL Respondent Heard: 25 February 2016 Delivered: 24 March 2016 Summary: Section 24 of the LRA provides for arbitration of disputes about the ‘interpretation or application’ of collective agreements– interpretation of – section provides for a dispute resolution device ancillary to collective bargaining, not to be used to remedy an unfair labour practice under pretext that a term of a collective agreement has been breached. The phrase ‘interpretation or application’ is not to be read disjunctively – the ‘enforcement’ of the terms of a collective agreement is a process which follows on a positive finding about ‘application’ not a facet of ‘application’. A dispute about an employer’s failure to pay an employee during period of suspension pending a disciplinary enquiry is, properly characterised, an unfair labour practice about unfair suspension as contemplated in section 186(2) (b) of the LRA. 2 An arbitrator must characterise a dispute objectively, not slavishly defer to the parties’ subjective characterisation- failure to do so is an irregularity. The determination of what constitutes a reasonable time within which to refer a dispute when no fixed period is prescribed for that category of dispute, such as a section 24 dispute, is a fact-specific enquiry having regard to the dynamics of labour relations considerations – where for example the dispute may be understood as a money claim, the prescription laws are irrelevant. Labour court reviewing and setting aside award in which arbitrator deferred to an incorrect characterisation of a dispute and ordering the matter to be heard afresh upheld and appeal against order dismissed.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Bargaining Agreements and the Requirement to ‘Consult’
    About the Institute of Public Affairs The Institute of PuBlic Affairs is an independent, non-profit puBlic policy think tank, dedicated to preserving and strengthening the foundations of economic and political freedom. Since 1943, the IPA has been at the forefront of the political and policy debate, defining the contemporary political landscape. The IPA is funded By individual memBerships and subscriptions, as well as philanthropic and corporate donors. The IPA supports the free market of ideas, the free flow of capital, a limited and efficient government, evidence-Based puBlic policy, the rule of law, and representative democracy. Throughout human history, these ideas have proven themselves to be the most dynamic, liBerating and exciting. Our researchers apply these ideas to the puBlic policy questions which matter today. About the authors Gideon Rozner is an Adjunct Fellow at the Institute of PuBlic Affairs. He was admitted to the Supreme Court of Victoria in 2011 and spent several years practicing as a lawyer at one of Australia’s largest commercial law firms, as well as acting as general counsel to an ASX-200 company. Gideon has also worked as a policy adviser to ministers in the AbBott and TurnBull Governments. Gideon holds a Bachelor of Laws (Honours) and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of MelBourne. Aaron Lane is a Legal Fellow at the Institute of PuBlic Affairs. He specialises in employment, industrial relations, regulation and workplace law. He is a lawyer, admitted to the Supreme Court of Victoria in 2012. He has appeared before the Fair Work Commission, the Productivity Commission, and the Senate Economics Committee, among other courts and triBunals.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice and Procedure Manual
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 5th Edition November 2010 101 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 101 Chapter 2 Functions, Jurisdiction and Powers Generally 201 Chapter 3 Notice and service 301 Chapter 4 Representation 401 Chapter 5 Referrals and initial administration 501 Chapter 6 Pre-conciliation 601 Chapter 7 Con-Arb 701 Chapter 8 Conciliation 801 Chapter 9 Certificates 901 Chapter 10 Settlement agreements 1001 Chapter 11 Request for arbitration, pre-arbitration procedures and subpoenas 1101 Chapter 12 Arbitrations 1201 Chapter 13 Admissibility and evaluation of evidence 1301 Chapter 14 Awards 1401 Chapter 15 Applications 1501 Chapter 16 Condonation applications 1601 Chapter 17 Rescissions and variations 1701 Chapter 18 Costs and taxation 1801 Chapter 19 Enforcement of settlement agreements and arbitration awards 1901 Chapter 20 Pre-dismissal arbitration 2001 Chapter 21 Review of arbitration awards 2101 Chapter 22 Contempt of the Commission 2201 Chapter 23 Facilitation of retrenchments in terms of section 189A of the LRA 2301 Chapter 24 Intervention in disputes in terms of section 150 of the LRA 2401 102 Chapter 25 Record of proceedings 2501 Chapter 26 Demarcations 2601 Chapter 27 Picketing 2701 Chapter 28 Diplomatic consulates and missions and international organisations 2801 Chapter 29 Index 2901 101 Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 This manual records the practices and procedures of the CCMA. It is a work in progress and the intention is to continuously improve and update it, particularly as and when practices and procedures change. The manual is written in a question and answer format. It was not intended to cover every possible question. The questions covered are those which most commonly arise in the every day work environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Relations Act 2016
    Queensland Industrial Relations Act 2016 Current as at 31 August 2017 Queensland Industrial Relations Act 2016 Contents Page Chapter 1 Preliminary Part 1 Introduction 1 Short title . 47 2 Commencement . 47 3 Main purpose of Act . 47 4 How main purpose is primarily achieved . 48 5 Act binds all persons . 50 Part 2 Interpretation 6 Definitions . 50 7 Who is an employer . 50 8 Who is an employee . 51 9 What is an industrial matter . 51 Part 3 General overview of scope of Act 10 Purpose of part . 52 11 Definition for part . 52 12 Who this Act applies to generally . 52 13 Who this Act applies to—particular provisions . 54 Chapter 2 Modern employment conditions Part 1 Preliminary 14 Definitions for chapter . 54 15 Meaning of long term casual employee . 55 Part 2 Interaction of elements of industrial relations system 16 What part is about . 55 17 Relationship between Queensland Employment Standards and other laws . 56 18 Relationship between Queensland Employment Standards and industrial instruments . 56 Industrial Relations Act 2016 Contents 19 Relationship of modern award with certified agreement . 56 20 Relationship of modern award with contract of service . 57 Part 3 Queensland Employment Standards Division 1 Preliminary 21 Meaning of Queensland Employment Standards . 57 Division 2 Minimum wage 22 Entitlement to minimum wage . 58 Division 3 Maximum weekly hours 23 Maximum weekly hours . 58 24 Applicable industrial instruments may provide for averaging of hours of work . 59 25 Averaging of hours of work for employees not covered by applicable industrial instruments . 60 26 Deciding whether additional hours are reasonable .
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of Union Membership Eligibility Rules in the Modern Award Era
    SHIFTING THE GOALPOSTS: INTERPRETATION OF UNION MEMBERSHIP ELIGIBILITY RULES IN THE MODERN AWARD ERA Australian Labour Lawyers Association 8th National Conference, 4-5 November 2016, Melbourne Daniel White1 (Special Counsel, Perth), Mills Oakley Lawyers, [email protected] Abstract The interpretation of union membership eligibility rules (union rules) has attracted considerable attention from Courts and Tribunals. The amalgamation of unions over the years has by no means assisted, resulting in ambiguous and confusing union rules which are very difficult to interpret. Union rules also overlap considerably, resulting in claims of membership coverage by multiple unions paving the way for costly demarcation disputes. As of 1 July 2009 the new Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) placed unions as bargaining representatives at centre stage of the collective enterprise-based bargaining regime. The result has drawn particular focus back to union rules as the source of eligibility to be a bargaining representative and the rights and obligations that flow from that. Awards have historically played an important role in carving out union “turf” under previous legislative schemes and thus assisted in defining the scope of union rules. However as of 1 January 2010, the introduction of Modern Awards, which do not name unions as being “a party”, has opened up the way for some unions to contest coverage and even venture into “new turf”. This paper will reflect on the key decisions concerning the interpretation of union rules, examine the patterns/trends taken by the Courts and Tribunals concerning union rules in the Modern Award era (particularly around bargaining) and promote some ideas for further debate around union rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment & Labour Law 2018
    ICLG The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Employment & Labour Law 2018 8th Edition A practical cross-border insight into employment and labour law Published by Global Legal Group with contributions from: A. Lopes Muniz Advogados Associados Koushos Korfiotis Papacharalambous LLC BAS – Sociedade de Advogados, SP, RL Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Carnelutti Law Firm Latournerie Wolfrom Avocats CDZ Legal Advisors Law firm Šafar & Partners, Ltd Debarliev, Dameski and Kelesoska, Attorneys at Law Mariscal & Abogados, Asociados Deloitte Kosova Sh.p.k. McCann FitzGerald Deloitte Legal Sh.p.k. Meridian Law Chambers DQ Advocates Limited Mori Hamada & Matsumoto EmpLaw Advokater AB Pachiu & Associates Erdinast, Ben Nathan, Toledano & Co. Advocates People + Culture Strategies FCLAW – LAWYERS & PRIVATE NOTARIES Rátkai Law Firm GANADO Advocates SEUM Law Global Law Office Shahid Law Firm Gün + Partners Skrine Gürlich & Co. Stikeman Elliott LLP Hamdan AlShamsi Lawyers and Legal Consultants Sulaiman & Herling Attorneys at Law Hogan Lovells Udo Udoma & Belo-Osagie Homburger Wildgen S.A. Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP Winkler Partners The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Employment & Labour Law 2018 General Chapter: 1 Where Next for the Gig Economy? – Stefan Martin & Jo Broadbent, Hogan Lovells 1 Country Question and Answer Chapters: 2 Albania Deloitte Legal Sh.p.k.: Sabina Lalaj & Ened Topi 5 Contributing Editors Stefan Martin & 3 Australia People + Culture Strategies: Joydeep Hor & Therese MacDermott 15 Jo Broadbent, Hogan Lovells 4 Bahamas Meridian Law Chambers: Dywan A – G. R. Rodgers 22 Sales Director Florjan Osmani 5 Brazil A. Lopes Muniz Advogados Associados: Antônio Lopes Muniz & Zilma Aparecida S. Ribeiro 28 Account Director Oliver Smith 6 Canada Stikeman Elliott LLP: Patrick L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labour Court of South Africa, Held at Johannesburg
    Of interest to other Judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case no: J1746/18 In the matter between: JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN BUS Applicant SERVICES SOC LTD and DEMOCRATIC MUNCIPAL AND ALLIED First Respondent WORKERS UNION SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS Second Respondent UNION INDEPENDENT MUNICIPAL AND ALLIED Third Respondent TRADE UNION PERSONS LISTED IN ANNEXURE “A” TO Fourth and further THE NOTICE OF MOTION Respondents Heard: 24 May 2018 Delivered: 04 June 2018 Summary: (s 68(3) of the LRA – curtailment of proceedings by agreement – salutary cost order nonetheless appropriate – final strike interdict – respondents not bound by collective agreements on grievances or collective bargaining – Page 2 council agreement not yet applicable to applicant – strike demands not rendering strike unprotected – application dismissed ) JUDGMENT LAGRANGE J Background [1] This is an urgent application for a final interdict to prevent a strike which was due to commence on 28 May 2017. The applicant, Metrobus, applies for two alternative forms of relief. It is opposed by the first respondent, the union DEMAWUSA. [2] Firstly, Metrobus seeks to interdict a strike on the basis that the dispute was prematurely referred to conciliation in breach of a grievance procedure forming part of the main agreement of the SALGBC, which it claims is applicable to the members of DEMAWUSA who intend to strike. In the alternative, it seeks a final order preventing them from embarking on the strike until a dispute regarding the application of the Main Agreement and the Salary and Wage Agreement of the bargaining council has been determined. Ordinarily, such an order is sought on an interim basis pending the outcome of the dispute referred to the bargaining council, but Metrobus has chosen to frame it as final relief.
    [Show full text]
  • CCMA Practice and Procedure Manual
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 7th Edition November 2014 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE MANUAL 7th Edition November 2014 1 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 101 Chapter 2 Functions, jurisdiction and powers generally 201 Chapter 3 Notice and service 301 Chapter 4 Representation 401 Chapter 5 Referrals and initial administration 501 Chapter 6 Pre-conciliation 601 Chapter 7 Con-Arb 701 Chapter 8 Conciliation 801 Chapter 9 Certificates 901 Chapter 10 Settlement agreements 1001 Chapter 11 Request for arbitration, pre-arbitration procedures and subpoenas 1101 Chapter 12 Arbitrations 1201 Chapter 13 Admissibility and evaluation of evidence 1301 Chapter 14 Awards 1401 Chapter 15 Applications 1501 Chapter 16 Condonation applications 1601 Chapter 17 Rescissions and variations 1701 Chapter 18 Costs and taxation 1801 Chapter 19 Enforcement of settlement agreements and arbitration awards 1901 Chapter 20 Pre-dismissal arbitration 2001 Chapter 21 Review of arbitration awards 2101 Chapter 22 Contempt of the Commission 2201 Chapter 23 Facilitation of retrenchments in terms of section 189A of the LRA 2301 Chapter 24 Intervention in disputes in terms of section 150 of the LRA 2401 2 Chapter 25 Record of proceedings 2501 Chapter 26 Demarcations 2601 Chapter 27 Picketing 2701 Chapter 28 Diplomatic consulates and missions and international organisations 2801 Chapter 29 Index 2901 101 Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 This manual records the practices and procedures of the CCMA. It is a work in progress and the intention is to continuously improve and update it, particularly as and when practices and procedures change. The manual is written in a question and answer format. It was not intended to cover every possible question.
    [Show full text]
  • European Socialism and Communism Communist Interventions, Volume I
    European Socialism and Communism Communist Interventions, Volume I Communist Research Cluster 2014 Reasoning about history is inseparably reasoning about power Guy Debord Preface We present here a history of twentieth-century communism through primary sources, divided into fourteen chapters arranged in chronological order. Each chapter deals with a historical moment or theoretical debate, and contains an amount of reading appropriate for one week's time. We hope that this reader will provide the foundation for seminars and reading groups. Tarrying with the history of twentieth-century communism is difficult: these texts issue a clar- ion call for human emancipation. At times, their authors seem almost hubristic. They confidently proclaim that the future belongs to communism. Yet, if these pages begin with a confident outlook, they end in despair. The twentieth century looks, to us, much as Walter Benjamin suggested the past did to the Angel of History: \Where we see the appearance of a chain of events, he sees one single catastrophe, which unceasingly piles rubble on top of rubble and hurls it before his feet." Why should we feel compelled to revisit this history, today? In compiling these texts, we hope to transmit a series of revolutionary perspectives. However { and this point bears repeating { we do not think that one can find answers to the burning questions of the present moment in the revolutionary theories of the past. It would be foolish to search these pages for the \right" perspective to adopt. Nevertheless, a historical awareness may prove useful, for at least two reasons. It has the po- tential to free us from overly simple perspectives on our own times.
    [Show full text]
  • An International Comparative Study of Conflict on the Waterfront
    AnPETER International TURNBULL Comparative AND DAVID Study SAPSFORDof Conflict on the Waterfront Hitting the Bricks: An International Comparative Study of Conflict on the Waterfront PETER TURNBULL* and DAVID SAPSFORD Although many longshoremen have a deserved reputation for militancy, the waterfront has been remarkably peaceful in some countries. The propensity of longshoremen to strike is explored in a historical and international comparative context, looking beyond industry-level variables to determine the nature and causes of industrial action. The incidence of strikes on the waterfront depended ultimately on the propriety of labor regulation, most notably the operation of dif- ferent “dock labor schemes” in combination with union leadership, management policy, and the efficacy of dispute resolution procedures. Introduction Whatever their nomenclature—longshoremen, dockers, wharfies, or watersiders—the people who work in the world’s ports have a reputation for militancy. Their proclivity to strike was noted by Kerr and Siegel (1954), who in their seminal study of the interindustry propensity to strike ranked longshoremen alongside miners, sailors, and loggers as one of the “isolated masses” of society, people with an “independent spirit” who perform dangerous, dirty, and unpleasant work that inclines them to be more vigorous and combative. More detailed studies of waterfront labor relations have likewise noted the importance of “certain widely prevalent conditions of dockwork” that combine to “produce a universal *Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University and Management School, University of Lancaster. E-mail: [email protected]. The financial support of both the Leverhulme Trust and the Economic and Social Research Council is gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to Paul Edwards, David Levine, and three anonymous referees for their comments on earlier drafts of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Further Reform of the Law Relating to Industrial Action
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 25 June 2008, no. 33, 2007–08, ISSN 1834-9854 Striking a balance: the need for further reform of the law relating to industrial action Jane Romeyn Research Branch1 Executive summary • A ‘right to strike’ has been widely recognised as a fundamental element of stable collective bargaining. Industrial action is one of the essential means available to employees to promote and protect their economic and social interests and resolve industrial disputes. Employers may also use industrial action (for example through lockouts). • Legislative frameworks have long been recognised internationally as having an important role to play in equalising power bases and promoting stable bargaining by establishing the ‘rules for the game’. A defined right to strike forms an important part of those rules. • In defining the rules of the game, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) attempts to ensure that the right of parties to take industrial action is balanced against other fundamental rights of workers, employers and the public—such as the freedom of non- strikers to work and the right to protection of property and personal safety. This is sometimes misunderstood by governments which, in attempting to protect the ‘public interest’, impose constraints that effectively limit any successful industrial action and thereby, impair the important role of industrial action in collective bargaining. 1. The author wishes to thank the four external academics who refereed the paper, as well as the staff of the Parliamentary Library who provided comments and assistance in finding materials.
    [Show full text]
  • INDUSTRIAL ACTION Avenues & Obstacles
    INDUSTRIAL ACTION Avenues & Obstacles Paper for the 2nd ACTU Industrial Officers Conference Sydney, 25-26 July 2006 Tim Lyons Senior Advocate National Union of Workers Industrial Action : Avenues & Obstacles TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION. ............................................................................................. 3 The bad news. ........................................................................................................................ 3 Don’t get too depressed…… ................................................................................................. 3 2. PREPARATION FOR BARGAINING & INDUSTRIAL ACTION. .......................... 3 2.1 Value of research. .................................................................................................... 3 2.2 The importance of density. ...................................................................................... 4 2.3 Internal systems & training on industrial action. ................................................... 4 2.4 Co-ordination – Single Bargaining Units. ............................................................... 4 2.5 Labour hire & industrial action. ............................................................................. 4 3. ACCESSING PROTECTED ACTION – PROCEDURAL ELEMENTS..................... 5 3.1 Log of Claims & Negotiations.................................................................................. 5 3.2 Bargaining Periods. (s.423) .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]