DOCSLIB.ORG

Dessins D'enfants and Counting Quasiplatonic Surfaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dessins D'enfants and Counting Quasiplatonic Surfaces Dessins d'Enfants and Counting Quasiplatonic Surfaces Charles Camacho Oregon State University USTARS at Reed College, Portland, Oregon April 8, 2018 1 The Compact Surface X ... 2 ...with a Bipartite Map... 4 2 6 1 7 5 1 3 7 2 6 3 5 4 3 ...as an Algebraic Curve over Q... 4 2 6 1 7 5 1 3 7 2 6 3 5 4 y 2 = x7 − x 4 ∼ ...with a Uniformizing Fuchsian Group Γ = π1(X )... 6 1 7 7 5 2 6 1 4 3 5 2 3 4 ∼ X = H=Γ 5 ...Contained in a Hyperbolic Triangle Group... 6 1 7 7 5 2 6 1 4 3 5 2 3 4 ∼ X = H=Γ Γ C ∆(n1; n2; n3) 6 ...with the Cyclic Group as Quotient 6 1 7 7 5 2 6 1 4 3 5 2 3 ∼ 4 X = H=Γ Γ C ∆(n1; n2; n3) ∼ ∆(n1; n2; n3)=Γ = Cn, the cyclic group of order n 7 Method: Enumerate all quasiplatonic actions of Cn on surfaces! Main Question How many quasiplatonic surfaces have regular dessins d'enfants with automorphism group Cn? 8 Main Question How many quasiplatonic surfaces have regular dessins d'enfants with automorphism group Cn? Method: Enumerate all quasiplatonic actions of Cn on surfaces! 8 Example Three dessins with order-seven symmetry on the Riemann sphere. Dessins d'Enfants A dessin d'enfant is a pair (X ; D), where X is an orientable, compact surface and D ⊂ X is a finite graph such that 1 D is connected, 2 D is bicolored (i.e., bipartite), 3 X n D is the union of finitely many topological discs, called the faces of D. 9 Dessins d'Enfants A dessin d'enfant is a pair (X ; D), where X is an orientable, compact surface and D ⊂ X is a finite graph such that 1 D is connected, 2 D is bicolored (i.e., bipartite), 3 X n D is the union of finitely many topological discs, called the faces of D. Example Three dessins with order-seven symmetry on the Riemann sphere. 9 The automorphism group Aut(D) of a dessin is the set of orientation-preserving homeomorphisms which preserve the dessin. A regular dessin is a dessin whose automorphism group acts transitively on the edges. In other words, regular dessins are the most symmetric of all dessins. Regular Dessins 10 A regular dessin is a dessin whose automorphism group acts transitively on the edges. In other words, regular dessins are the most symmetric of all dessins. Regular Dessins The automorphism group Aut(D) of a dessin is the set of orientation-preserving homeomorphisms which preserve the dessin. 10 In other words, regular dessins are the most symmetric of all dessins. Regular Dessins The automorphism group Aut(D) of a dessin is the set of orientation-preserving homeomorphisms which preserve the dessin. A regular dessin is a dessin whose automorphism group acts transitively on the edges. 10 Regular Dessins The automorphism group Aut(D) of a dessin is the set of orientation-preserving homeomorphisms which preserve the dessin. A regular dessin is a dessin whose automorphism group acts transitively on the edges. In other words, regular dessins are the most symmetric of all dessins. 10 In other words, quasiplatonic surfaces are the most symmetric of all compact Riemann surfaces. Figure: The Klein quartic of genus three with a regular dessin having 168 edges. (Credit: Girondo, Gonz´alez-Diez) Quasiplatonic Surfaces A quasiplatonic surface is a compact Riemann surface of genus at least two that admits a regular dessin. 11 Figure: The Klein quartic of genus three with a regular dessin having 168 edges. (Credit: Girondo, Gonz´alez-Diez) Quasiplatonic Surfaces A quasiplatonic surface is a compact Riemann surface of genus at least two that admits a regular dessin. In other words, quasiplatonic surfaces are the most symmetric of all compact Riemann surfaces. 11 Quasiplatonic Surfaces A quasiplatonic surface is a compact Riemann surface of genus at least two that admits a regular dessin. In other words, quasiplatonic surfaces are the most symmetric of all compact Riemann surfaces. Figure: The Klein quartic of genus three with a regular dessin having 168 edges. (Credit: Girondo, Gonz´alez-Diez) 11 For any compact Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, we have jAut(X )j ≤ 84(g − 1). This is the Hurwitz Automorphism Theorem. Some consequences are... 1 For any fixed genus g, there are finitely many regular dessins on genus g surfaces. 2 Thus, there are finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces of genus g. 3 For a given finite group G, there are only finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces X with a regular dessin D such that Aut(D) =∼ G. How do we enumerate such surfaces for a given G? Key Facts 12 Some consequences are... 1 For any fixed genus g, there are finitely many regular dessins on genus g surfaces. 2 Thus, there are finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces of genus g. 3 For a given finite group G, there are only finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces X with a regular dessin D such that Aut(D) =∼ G. How do we enumerate such surfaces for a given G? Key Facts For any compact Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, we have jAut(X )j ≤ 84(g − 1). This is the Hurwitz Automorphism Theorem. 12 1 For any fixed genus g, there are finitely many regular dessins on genus g surfaces. 2 Thus, there are finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces of genus g. 3 For a given finite group G, there are only finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces X with a regular dessin D such that Aut(D) =∼ G. How do we enumerate such surfaces for a given G? Key Facts For any compact Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, we have jAut(X )j ≤ 84(g − 1). This is the Hurwitz Automorphism Theorem. Some consequences are... 12 2 Thus, there are finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces of genus g. 3 For a given finite group G, there are only finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces X with a regular dessin D such that Aut(D) =∼ G. How do we enumerate such surfaces for a given G? Key Facts For any compact Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, we have jAut(X )j ≤ 84(g − 1). This is the Hurwitz Automorphism Theorem. Some consequences are... 1 For any fixed genus g, there are finitely many regular dessins on genus g surfaces. 12 3 For a given finite group G, there are only finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces X with a regular dessin D such that Aut(D) =∼ G. How do we enumerate such surfaces for a given G? Key Facts For any compact Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, we have jAut(X )j ≤ 84(g − 1). This is the Hurwitz Automorphism Theorem. Some consequences are... 1 For any fixed genus g, there are finitely many regular dessins on genus g surfaces. 2 Thus, there are finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces of genus g. 12 Key Facts For any compact Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, we have jAut(X )j ≤ 84(g − 1). This is the Hurwitz Automorphism Theorem. Some consequences are... 1 For any fixed genus g, there are finitely many regular dessins on genus g surfaces. 2 Thus, there are finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces of genus g. 3 For a given finite group G, there are only finitely many quasiplatonic surfaces X with a regular dessin D such that Aut(D) =∼ G. How do we enumerate such surfaces for a given G? 12 Two actions 1 and 2 are equivalent if 1(G) and 2(G) are conjugate in Homeo+(X ). For a Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, a group G acts conformally X if there is a monomorphism : G ! Aut(X ). Group Acting on a Surface A group G acts topologically on a surface X of genus g ≥ 2 if there is a monomorphism : G ! Homeo+(X ). 13 For a Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, a group G acts conformally X if there is a monomorphism : G ! Aut(X ). Group Acting on a Surface A group G acts topologically on a surface X of genus g ≥ 2 if there is a monomorphism : G ! Homeo+(X ). Two actions 1 and 2 are equivalent if 1(G) and 2(G) are conjugate in Homeo+(X ). 13 Group Acting on a Surface A group G acts topologically on a surface X of genus g ≥ 2 if there is a monomorphism : G ! Homeo+(X ). Two actions 1 and 2 are equivalent if 1(G) and 2(G) are conjugate in Homeo+(X ). For a Riemann surface X of genus g ≥ 2, a group G acts conformally X if there is a monomorphism : G ! Aut(X ). 13 Proposition (Wootton, 2007) ∼ The number of topological group actions of G on X = H=Γ where ∼ G = ∆(n1; n2; n3)=Γ equals the number of PSL2(R)-conjugacy classes of Γ. The triple (n1; n2; n3) is called a signature of X . Each ni is called a period. Group Actions and Riemann Surfaces Theorem (Wootton, 2007) A topological group action of G on a surface X extends to a unique conformal action if and only if G is a quotient of a hyperbolic triangle group ∆(n1; n2; n3). 14 The triple (n1; n2; n3) is called a signature of X . Each ni is called a period. Group Actions and Riemann Surfaces Theorem (Wootton, 2007) A topological group action of G on a surface X extends to a unique conformal action if and only if G is a quotient of a hyperbolic triangle group ∆(n1; n2; n3).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Discrete Generalised Triangle Groups
    Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society (1995) 38, 397-412 © ON DISCRETE GENERALISED TRIANGLE GROUPS by M. HAGELBERG, C. MACLACHLAN and G. ROSENBERGER (Received 29th October 1993) A generalised triangle group has a presentation of the form where R is a cyclically reduced word involving both x and y. When R=xy, these classical triangle groups have representations as discrete groups of isometries of S2, R2, H2 depending on In this paper, for other words R, faithful discrete representations of these groups in Isom + H3 = PSL(2,C) are considered with particular emphasis on the case /? = [x, y] and also on the relationship between the Euler characteristic x and finite covolume representations. 1991 Mathematics subject classification: 20H15. 1. Introduction In this article, we consider generalised triangle groups, i.e. groups F with a presentation of the form where R(x,y) is a cyclically reduced word in the free product on x,y which involves both x and y. These groups have been studied for their group theoretical interest [8, 7, 13], for topological reasons [2], and more recently for their connections with hyperbolic 3-manifolds and orbifolds [12, 10]. Here we will be concerned with faithful discrete representations p:T-*PSL(2,C) with particular emphasis on the cases where the Kleinian group p(F) has finite covolume. In Theorem 3.2, we give necessary conditions on the group F so that it should admit such a faithful discrete representation of finite covolume. For certain generalised triangle groups where the word R(x,y) has a specified form, faithful discrete representations as above have been constructed by Helling-Mennicke- Vinberg [12] and by the first author [11].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Math/0306105V2
    A bound for the number of automorphisms of an arithmetic Riemann surface BY MIKHAIL BELOLIPETSKY Sobolev Institute of Mathematics, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia e-mail: [email protected] AND GARETH A. JONES Faculty of Mathematical Studies, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ e-mail: [email protected] Abstract We show that for every g ≥ 2 there is a compact arithmetic Riemann surface of genus g with at least 4(g − 1) automorphisms, and that this lower bound is attained by infinitely many genera, the smallest being 24. 1. Introduction Schwarz [17] proved that the automorphism group of a compact Riemann surface of genus g ≥ 2 is finite, and Hurwitz [10] showed that its order is at most 84(g − 1). This bound is sharp, by which we mean that it is attained for infinitely many g, and the least genus of such an extremal surface is 3. However, it is also well known that there are infinitely many genera for which the bound 84(g − 1) is not attained. It therefore makes sense to consider the maximal order N(g) of the group of automorphisms of any Riemann surface of genus g. Accola [1] and Maclachlan [14] independently proved that N(g) ≥ 8(g +1). This bound is also sharp, and according to p. 93 of [2], Paul Hewitt has shown that the least genus attaining it is 23. Thus we have the following sharp bounds for N(g) with g ≥ 2: 8(g + 1) ≤ N(g) ≤ 84(g − 1). arXiv:math/0306105v2 [math.GR] 21 Nov 2004 We now consider these bounds from an arithmetic point of view, defining arithmetic Riemann surfaces to be those which are uniformized by arithmetic Fuchsian groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1012.2020V1 [Math.CV]
    TRANSITIVITY ON WEIERSTRASS POINTS ZOË LAING AND DAVID SINGERMAN 1. Introduction An automorphism of a Riemann surface will preserve its set of Weier- strass points. In this paper, we search for Riemann surfaces whose automorphism groups act transitively on the Weierstrass points. One well-known example is Klein’s quartic, which is known to have 24 Weierstrass points permuted transitively by it’s automorphism group, PSL(2, 7) of order 168. An investigation of when Hurwitz groups act transitively has been made by Magaard and Völklein [19]. After a section on the preliminaries, we examine the transitivity property on several classes of surfaces. The easiest case is when the surface is hy- perelliptic, and we find all hyperelliptic surfaces with the transitivity property (there are infinitely many of them). We then consider surfaces with automorphism group PSL(2, q), Weierstrass points of weight 1, and other classes of Riemann surfaces, ending with Fermat curves. Basically, we find that the transitivity property property seems quite rare and that the surfaces we have found with this property are inter- esting for other reasons too. 2. Preliminaries Weierstrass Gap Theorem ([6]). Let X be a compact Riemann sur- face of genus g. Then for each point p ∈ X there are precisely g integers 1 = γ1 < γ2 <...<γg < 2g such that there is no meromor- arXiv:1012.2020v1 [math.CV] 9 Dec 2010 phic function on X whose only pole is one of order γj at p and which is analytic elsewhere. The integers γ1,...,γg are called the gaps at p. The complement of the gaps at p in the natural numbers are called the non-gaps at p.
    [Show full text]
  • REFLECTION GROUPS and COXETER GROUPS by Kouver
    REFLECTION GROUPS AND COXETER GROUPS by Kouver Bingham A Senior Honors Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The University of Utah In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Honors Degree in Bachelor of Science In Department of Mathematics Approved: Mladen Bestviva Dr. Peter Trapa Supervisor Chair, Department of Mathematics ( Jr^FeraSndo Guevara Vasquez Dr. Sylvia D. Torti Department Honors Advisor Dean, Honors College July 2014 ABSTRACT In this paper we give a survey of the theory of Coxeter Groups and Reflection groups. This survey will give an undergraduate reader a full picture of Coxeter Group theory, and will lean slightly heavily on the side of showing examples, although the course of discussion will be based on theory. We’ll begin in Chapter 1 with a discussion of its origins and basic examples. These examples will illustrate the importance and prevalence of Coxeter Groups in Mathematics. The first examples given are the symmetric group <7„, and the group of isometries of the ^-dimensional cube. In Chapter 2 we’ll formulate a general notion of a reflection group in topological space X, and show that such a group is in fact a Coxeter Group. In Chapter 3 we’ll introduce the Poincare Polyhedron Theorem for reflection groups which will vastly expand our understanding of reflection groups thereafter. We’ll also give some surprising examples of Coxeter Groups that section. Then, in Chapter 4 we’ll make a classification of irreducible Coxeter Groups, give a linear representation for an arbitrary Coxeter Group, and use this complete the fact that all Coxeter Groups can be realized as reflection groups with Tit’s Theorem.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformal Quasicrystals and Holography
    Conformal Quasicrystals and Holography Latham Boyle1, Madeline Dickens2 and Felix Flicker2;3 1Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, Canada, N2L 2Y5 2Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 3Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, United Kingdom Recent studies of holographic tensor network models defined on regular tessellations of hyperbolic space have not yet addressed the underlying discrete geometry of the boundary. We show that the boundary degrees of freedom naturally live on a novel structure, a conformal quasicrystal, that pro- vides a discrete model of conformal geometry. We introduce and construct a class of one-dimensional conformal quasicrystals, and discuss a higher-dimensional example (related to the Penrose tiling). Our construction permits discretizations of conformal field theories that preserve an infinite discrete subgroup of the global conformal group at the cost of lattice periodicity. I. INTRODUCTION dom [12{24]. Meanwhile, quantum information theory provides a unifying language for these studies in terms of entanglement, quantum circuits, and quantum error A central topic in theoretical physics over the past two correction [25]. decades has been holography: the idea that a quantum These investigations have gradually clarified our un- theory in a bulk space may be precisely dual to another derstanding of the discrete geometry in the bulk. There living on the boundary of that space. The most concrete has been a common expectation, based on an analogy and widely-studied realization of this idea has been the with AdS/CFT [1{3], that TNs living on discretizations AdS/CFT correspondence [1{3], in which a gravitational of a hyperbolic space define a lattice state of a critical theory living in a (d + 1)-dimensional negatively-curved system on the boundary and vice-versa.
    [Show full text]
  • On Subgroups of Tetrahedron Groups
    On Subgroups of Tetrahedron Groups Ma. Louise N. De Las Peñas1, Rene P. Felix2 and Glenn R. Laigo3 1Mathematics Department, Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, Quezon City, Philippines. [email protected] 2Institute of Mathematics, University of the Philippines – Diliman, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines. [email protected] 3Mathematics Department, Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, Quezon City, Philippines. [email protected] Abstract. We present a framework to determine subgroups of tetrahedron groups and tetrahedron Kleinian groups, based on tools in color symmetry theory. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). 20F55, 20F67 Key words. Coxeter tetrahedra, tetrahedron groups, tetrahedron Kleinian groups, color symmetry 1 Introduction In [6, 7] the determination of the subgroups of two-dimensional symmetry groups was facilitated using a geometric approach and applying concepts in color symmetry theory. In particular, these works derived low-indexed subgroups of a triangle group *abc, a group generated by reflections along the sides of a given triangle ∆ with interior angles π/a, π/b and π/c where a, b, c are integers ≥ 2. The elements of *abc are symmetries of the tiling formed by copies of ∆. The subgroups of *abc were calculated from colorings of this given tiling, assuming a corresponding group of color permutations. In this work, we pursue the three dimensional case and extend the problem to determine subgroups of tetrahedron groups, groups generated by reflections along the faces of a Coxeter tetrahedron, which are groups of symmetries of tilings in space by tetrahedra. The study will also address determining subgroups of other types of three dimensional symmetry groups such as the tetrahedron Kleinian groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits
    Convex Polytopes and Tilings with Few Flag Orbits by Nicholas Matteo B.A. in Mathematics, Miami University M.A. in Mathematics, Miami University A dissertation submitted to The Faculty of the College of Science of Northeastern University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 14, 2015 Dissertation directed by Egon Schulte Professor of Mathematics Abstract of Dissertation The amount of symmetry possessed by a convex polytope, or a tiling by convex polytopes, is reflected by the number of orbits of its flags under the action of the Euclidean isometries preserving the polytope. The convex polytopes with only one flag orbit have been classified since the work of Schläfli in the 19th century. In this dissertation, convex polytopes with up to three flag orbits are classified. Two-orbit convex polytopes exist only in two or three dimensions, and the only ones whose combinatorial automorphism group is also two-orbit are the cuboctahedron, the icosidodecahedron, the rhombic dodecahedron, and the rhombic triacontahedron. Two-orbit face-to-face tilings by convex polytopes exist on E1, E2, and E3; the only ones which are also combinatorially two-orbit are the trihexagonal plane tiling, the rhombille plane tiling, the tetrahedral-octahedral honeycomb, and the rhombic dodecahedral honeycomb. Moreover, any combinatorially two-orbit convex polytope or tiling is isomorphic to one on the above list. Three-orbit convex polytopes exist in two through eight dimensions. There are infinitely many in three dimensions, including prisms over regular polygons, truncated Platonic solids, and their dual bipyramids and Kleetopes. There are infinitely many in four dimensions, comprising the rectified regular 4-polytopes, the p; p-duoprisms, the bitruncated 4-simplex, the bitruncated 24-cell, and their duals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure of Mirrors on Platonic Surfaces
    The structure of mirrors on Platonic surfaces Adnan Meleko˘glu David Singerman Department of Mathematics School of Mathematics Faculty of Arts and Sciences University of Southampton Adnan Menderes University Southampton, SO17 1BJ 09010 Aydın, TURKEY ENGLAND email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Abstract A Platonic surface is a Riemann surface that underlies a regular map and so we can consider its vertices, edge-centres and face-centres. A symmetry (anticonformal involution) of the surface will fix a number of simple closed curves which we call mirrors. These mirrors must pass through the vertices, edge-centres and face-centres in some sequence which we call the pattern of the mirror. Here we investigate these patterns for various well-known families of Platonic surfaces, including genus 1 regular maps, and regular maps on Hurwitz surfaces and Fermat curves. The genesis of this paper is classical. Klein in Section 13 of his famous 1878 paper [11], worked out the pattern of the mirrors on the Klein quartic and Coxeter in his book on regular polytopes worked out the patterns for mirrors on the regular solids. We believe that this topic has not been pursued since then. Keywords: Riemann surface, Platonic surface, regular map, mirror, pattern, link index. Mathematics Subject Classifications: 30F10, 05C10. 1 Introduction A compact Riemann surface X is Platonic if it admits a regular map. By a map (or clean arXiv:1501.04744v1 [math.CO] 20 Jan 2015 dessin d’enfant) on X we mean an embedding of a graph G into X such that X \G is a union of simply connected polygonal regions, called faces.
    [Show full text]
  • Gram Matrix of Coxeter Symmetric Tetrahedrons with Dihedral Spherical Triangle Group
    International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET) Volume 10, Issue 6, November-December 2019, pp. 453-461, Article ID: IJARET_10_06_050 Available online at http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJARET?Volume=10&Issue=6 ISSN Print: 0976-6480 and ISSN Online: 0976-6499 DOI: 10.34218/IJARET.10.6.2019.050 © IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed GRAM MATRIX OF COXETER SYMMETRIC TETRAHEDRONS WITH DIHEDRAL SPHERICAL TRIANGLE GROUP Pranab Kalita Department of Mathematics, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya Adarsha Mahavidyalaya, Dalgaon, Darrang, Assam, India ABSTRACT Simplex is the building block of space in geometry. It is basically a polytope which is a generalization of the notion of a triangle or tetrahedron to arbitrary dimensions. The gram matrix is the most essential and natural tool associated to a simplex. The geometric properties of a simplex are enclosed in the eigenvalues of a gram matrix. In this paper, we have classified the coxeter symmetric tetrahedrons with dihedral spherical triangle group, and it has been found that there are four such coxeter symmetric tetrahedrons with dihedral spherical triangle group upto symmetry. We also found the determinants and eigenvalues of the gram matrices of those four tetrahedrons using Maple Software. Keywords: Triangle Groups, Tetrahedron, Gram Matrix, Spectrum Cite this Article: Pranab Kalita, Gram Matrix of Coxeter Symmetric Tetrahedrons with Dihedral Spherical Triangle Group, International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 10(6), 2019, pp. 453-461. http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJARET?Volume=10&Issue=6 1. INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES Simplex (in plural, simplexes or simplices) is the building block of space in geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Point-Circle Pentagonal Geometries from Moore Graphs
    Also available at http://amc-journal.eu ISSN 1855-3966 (printed edn.), ISSN 1855-3974 (electronic edn.) ARS MATHEMATICA CONTEMPORANEA 11 (2016) 215–229 Geometric point-circle pentagonal geometries from Moore graphs Klara Stokes ∗ School of Engineering Science, University of Skovde,¨ 54128 Skovde¨ Sweden Milagros Izquierdo Department of Mathematics, Linkoping¨ University, 58183 Linkoping¨ Sweden Received 27 December 2014, accepted 13 October 2015, published online 15 November 2015 Abstract We construct isometric point-circle configurations on surfaces from uniform maps. This gives one geometric realisation in terms of points and circles of the Desargues configura- tion in the real projective plane, and three distinct geometric realisations of the pentagonal geometry with seven points on each line and seven lines through each point on three distinct dianalytic surfaces of genus 57. We also give a geometric realisation of the latter pentago- nal geometry in terms of points and hyperspheres in 24 dimensional Euclidean space. From these, we also obtain geometric realisations in terms of points and circles (or hyperspheres) of pentagonal geometries with k circles (hyperspheres) through each point and k −1 points on each circle (hypersphere). Keywords: Uniform map, equivelar map, dessin d’enfants, configuration of points and circles Math. Subj. Class.: 05B30, 05B45, 14H57, 14N20, 30F10, 30F50, 51E26 1 Introduction A compact Klein surface S is a surface (possibly with boundary and non-orientable) en- dowed with a dianalytic structure, that is, the transition maps are holomorphic or antiholo- morphic (the conjugation z ! z is allowed). If the surface S admits analytic structure and is closed, then the surface is a Riemann surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessing the Cohomology of Discrete Groups Above Their Virtual Cohomological Dimension
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Open Repository and Bibliography - Luxembourg ACCESSING THE COHOMOLOGY OF DISCRETE GROUPS ABOVE THEIR VIRTUAL COHOMOLOGICAL DIMENSION ALEXANDER D. RAHM Abstract. We introduce a method to explicitly determine the Farrell–Tate cohomology of discrete groups. We apply this method to the Coxeter triangle and tetrahedral groups as well as to the Bianchi groups, i.e. PSL2(O) for O the ring of integers in an imaginary quadratic number field, and to their finite index subgroups. We show that the Farrell–Tate cohomology of the Bianchi groups is completely determined by the numbers of conjugacy classes of finite subgroups. In fact, our access to Farrell–Tate cohomology allows us to detach the information about it from geometric models for the Bianchi groups and to express it only with the group structure. Formulae for the numbers of conjugacy classes of finite subgroups have been determined in a thesis of Kr¨amer, in terms of elementary number-theoretic information on O. An evaluation of these formulae for a large number of Bianchi groups is provided numerically in the electronically released appendix to this paper. Our new insights about their homological torsion allow us to give a conceptual description of the cohomology ring structure of the Bianchi groups. 1. Introduction Our objects of study are discrete groups Γ such that Γ admits a torsion-free subgroup of finite index. By a theorem of Serre, all the torsion-free subgroups of finite index in Γ have the same cohomological dimension; this dimension is called the virtual cohomological dimension (abbreviated vcd) of Γ.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualization of Regular Maps Scientific Visualization – Math Vis Vis – Human Computer Interaction – Visual Analytics – Parallel
    2/2/2016 Visualization Eindhoven – information visualization – software visualization – perception – geographic visualization Visualization of Regular Maps scientific visualization – math vis vis – human computer interaction – visual analytics – parallel Jarke J. van Wijk Eindhoven University of Technology JCB 2016, Bordeaux Data : flow fields – trees – graphs – tables – mobile data – events – … Applications : software analysis – business cases – bioinformatics – … Can you draw a Seifert surface? Eindhoven 2004 Huh? Starting MathVis Arjeh Cohen Me Discrete geometry, Visualization algebra Seifert surface Eindhoven 2006 1 2/2/2016 Can you show 364 triangles in 3D? Aberdeenshire Sure! 2000 BC I’ll give you the Arjeh Cohenpattern, you can Me pick a nice shape. Discrete geometry, Visualization algebra Ok! Athens 450 BC Scottish Neolithic carved stone balls 8 12 20 8 12 20? 6 6 4 4 Platonic solids: perfectly symmetric Platonic solids: perfectly symmetric 2 2/2/2016 How to get more faces, How to get more faces, all perfectly symmetric? all perfectly symmetric? Use shapes with holes Aim only at topological symmetry 64 64 #faces? Königsberg 1893 3 2/2/2016 Adolf Hurwitz 1859-1919 max. #faces: 3 28(genus – 1) 7 Genus Faces Genus Faces 3 56 3 56 7 168 7 168 14 364 14 364 … … … … Can you show 364 triangles in 3D? New Orleans Sure! 2009 I’ll give you the three years later Arjeh pattern, you can Me Cohen pick a nice shape. Ok! 4 2/2/2016 The general puzzle Construct space models of regular maps Symmetric Tiling of Closed Surfaces: Visualization of
    [Show full text]