Economic Reform in India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AGRICULTURE POLICY in INDIA: the ROLE of INPUT SUBSIDIES -Nick Grossman ([email protected]) and Dylan Carlson ([email protected])
USITC Executive Briefings on Trade March 2011 AGRICULTURE POLICY IN INDIA: THE ROLE OF INPUT SUBSIDIES -Nick Grossman ([email protected]) and Dylan Carlson ([email protected]) In India, agricultural trade policy is a part of a larger food and agriculture policy regime that seeks to maintain food self-sufficiency while providing income support to the agricultural sector and poor consumers. The Government of India (GOI) uses a variety of policy instruments in attempting to achieve these goals, including: Domestic subsidies to inputs, outputs, transportation, storage, and consumption to reduce producer costs and consumer prices. Border measures such as subsidies, tariffs, quotas, and non-tariff measures to protect domestic producers from import competition, manage domestic price levels, and guarantee domestic supply. Input subsidies are the most expensive aspect of India’s food and agriculture policy regime, requiring a steadily larger budget share. India subsidizes agricultural inputs in an attempt to keep farm costs low and production high. GOI’s intended result is for farmers to benefit from lower costs, but also for them to pass some of the savings on to the consumers in the form of lower food prices. GOI pays fertilizer producers directly in exchange for the companies selling fertilizer at lower than market prices. Irrigation and electricity, on the other hand, are supplied directly to farmers by GOI at prices that are below the cost of production. These policies result in effective subsidies to the farmer of 40 to 75 percent for fertilizer and 70 to 90 percent for irrigation and electricity. Input subsidies can also produce unintended effects. -
Architect of New India Fortnightly Magazine Editor Prabhat Jha
@Kamal.Sandesh KamalSandeshLive www.kamalsandesh.org kamal.sandesh @KamalSandesh SPECIAL EDITION 17 September, 2020 `100.00 ABHINANDAN ! Special Edition of Kamal Sandesh on the occasion of 70th birthday of Hon’ble Prime Minister SHRI NARENDRA MODI ARCHITECTARCHITECT OFOF NNEWEWArchitect ofII NewNDINDI India KAMAL SANDESHAA 1 Self-reliant India will stand on five Pillars. First Pillar is Economy, an economy that brings Quantum Jump rather than Incremental change. Second Pillar is Infrastructure, an infrastructure that became the identity of modern India. Third Pillar is Our System. A system that is driven by technology which can fulfill the dreams of the 21st century; a system not based on the policy of the past century. Fourth Pillar is Our Demography. Our Vibrant Demography is our strength in the world’s largest democracy, our source of energy for self-reliant India. The fifth pillar is Demand. The cycle of demand & supply chain in our economy is the strength that needs to be harnessed to its full potential. SHRI NARENDRA MODI Hon’ble Prime Minister of India 2 KAMAL SANDESH Architect of New India Fortnightly Magazine Editor Prabhat Jha Executive Editor Dr. Shiv Shakti Bakshi Associate Editors Ram Prasad Tripathy Vikash Anand Creative Editors Vikas Saini Bhola Roy Digital Media Rajeev Kumar Vipul Sharma Subscription & Circulation Satish Kumar E-mail [email protected] [email protected] Phone: 011-23381428, FAX: 011-23387887 Website: www.kamalsandesh.org 04 EDITORIAL 46 2016 - ‘IndIA IS NOT 70 YEARS OLD BUT THIS JOURNEY IS -
Redesigning India's Urea Policy
Redesigning India’s urea policy Sid Ravinutala MPA/ID Candidate 2016 in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Public Administration in International Development, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Advisor: Martin Rotemberg Section Leader: Michael Walton ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser, Government of India for the opportunity to work on this issue as part of his team. Credit for the demand-side solution presented at the end goes to Nandan Nilekani, who casually dropped it while in a car ride, and of course to Arvind for encouraging me to pursue it. Credit for the supply-side solution goes to Arvind, who from the start believed that decanalization throttles efficiency in the market. He has motivated a lot of the analysis presented here. I would also like to thank the rest of the members of ‘team CEA’. We worked on fertilizer policy together and they helped me better understand the issues, the people, and the data. The analyses of domestic firms and the size and regressivity of the black market were done by other members of the team (Sutirtha, Shoumitro, and Kapil) and all credit goes to them. Finally, I want to thank my wife, Mara Horwitz, and friend and colleague Siddharth George for reviewing various parts and providing edits and critical feedback. Finally, I would like to thank Michael Walton and Martin Rotemberg for providing insightful feedback and guidance as I narrowed my policy questions and weighed possible solutions. I also had the opportunity to contribute to the chapter on fertilizer policy in India’s 2016 Economic Survey. -
List of Successful Candidates
11 - LIST OF SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATES CONSTITUENCY WINNER PARTY Andhra Pradesh 1 Nagarkurnool Dr. Manda Jagannath INC 2 Nalgonda Gutha Sukender Reddy INC 3 Bhongir Komatireddy Raj Gopal Reddy INC 4 Warangal Rajaiah Siricilla INC 5 Mahabubabad P. Balram INC 6 Khammam Nama Nageswara Rao TDP 7 Aruku Kishore Chandra Suryanarayana INC Deo Vyricherla 8 Srikakulam Killi Krupa Rani INC 9 Vizianagaram Jhansi Lakshmi Botcha INC 10 Visakhapatnam Daggubati Purandeswari INC 11 Anakapalli Sabbam Hari INC 12 Kakinada M.M.Pallamraju INC 13 Amalapuram G.V.Harsha Kumar INC 14 Rajahmundry Aruna Kumar Vundavalli INC 15 Narsapuram Bapiraju Kanumuru INC 16 Eluru Kavuri Sambasiva Rao INC 17 Machilipatnam Konakalla Narayana Rao TDP 18 Vijayawada Lagadapati Raja Gopal INC 19 Guntur Rayapati Sambasiva Rao INC 20 Narasaraopet Modugula Venugopala Reddy TDP 21 Bapatla Panabaka Lakshmi INC 22 Ongole Magunta Srinivasulu Reddy INC 23 Nandyal S.P.Y.Reddy INC 24 Kurnool Kotla Jaya Surya Prakash Reddy INC 25 Anantapur Anantha Venkata Rami Reddy INC 26 Hindupur Kristappa Nimmala TDP 27 Kadapa Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy INC 28 Nellore Mekapati Rajamohan Reddy INC 29 Tirupati Chinta Mohan INC 30 Rajampet Annayyagari Sai Prathap INC 31 Chittoor Naramalli Sivaprasad TDP 32 Adilabad Rathod Ramesh TDP 33 Peddapalle Dr.G.Vivekanand INC 34 Karimnagar Ponnam Prabhakar INC 35 Nizamabad Madhu Yaskhi Goud INC 36 Zahirabad Suresh Kumar Shetkar INC 37 Medak Vijaya Shanthi .M TRS 38 Malkajgiri Sarvey Sathyanarayana INC 39 Secundrabad Anjan Kumar Yadav M INC 40 Hyderabad Asaduddin Owaisi AIMIM 41 Chelvella Jaipal Reddy Sudini INC 1 GENERAL ELECTIONS,INDIA 2009 LIST OF SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE CONSTITUENCY WINNER PARTY Andhra Pradesh 42 Mahbubnagar K. -
Report Includes Inputs from Prof
Action PlAn for Green BudGetinG in PunjAB Concepts, Rationale and Ways Forward The Energy and Resources Institute Project support: Department of Science Technology and Environment, Government of Punjab © The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) and Punjab State Council for Science and Technology (PSCST) Disclaimer All rights reserved. Any part of this publication may be quoted, copied, or translated by indicating the source. The analysis and policy recommendations of the book do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations or entities associated with them. Suggested Citation PSCST-TERI. (2014). Action Plan for Green Budgeting in Punjab: Concepts, Rationale and Ways Forward. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) and Punjab State Council for Science and Technology (PSCST). Supported by Department of Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Punjab. The Cover The exhibit on the cover page is metaphorical depiction of a pot with a flowering plant. The picture attempts to communicate how a proactive mind-set could lead to to activities contributing to environmental sustainability through enhanced allocation of public finance. Project Action Plan for Green Budget for Punjab Document Name Action Plan for Green Budgeting in Punjab: Concepts, Rationale and Ways Forward Project Support Department of Science Technology and Environment, Government of Punjab Nodal Agency Punjab State Council for Science and Technology (PSCST), Chandigarh Research Organization The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI), Delhi Project -
Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment
22 STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT (2011 - 2012) (FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA) MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT Action taken by the Government on the observations/recommendations contained in the Fifteenth Report of the Standing Committee on Social Justice and Empowerment (Fifteenth Lok Sabha) on Demands for Grants (2011-12) of the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. TWENTY – SECOND REPORT LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI March, 2012/Chaitra, 1934 (Saka) 1 TWENTY - SECOND REPORT STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT (2011-2012) (FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA) MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT Action taken by the Government on the observations/recommendations contained in the Fifteenth Report of the Standing Committee on Social Justice and Empowerment (Fifteenth Lok Sabha) on Demands for Grants (2011-12) of the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. Presented to Lok Sabha on 21.3.2012 Laid in Rajya Sabha on 21.3.2012 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI March, 2012/Chaitra, 1934 (Saka) 2 CONTENTS PAGE COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I Report CHAPTER II Observations/Recommendations which have been accepted by the Government. CHAPTER III Observations/Recommendations which the Committee do not desire to pursue in view of the replies of the Government. CHAPTER IV Observations/Recommendations in respect of which replies of the Government have not been accepted and have been commented upon by the Committee in Chapter- I. CHAPTER V Observations/Recommendations in respect of which replies of the Government are interim in nature. ANNEXURES ANNEXURE I Details of the present status of the 14 recommendations contained in the Fourth Report of the Committee (Fifteenth Lok Sabha) on Demands for Grants (2010-11) of the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment. -
Cabinet Ministers of India 2019 Pdf Download Telugu
Cabinet ministers of india 2019 pdf download telugu Continue 2,139 total views, 1 view today Download PDF on ministers of the Union of India government 2019. The list includes cabinet ministers, a minister of state (independent charge), a minister of state. We've updated every portfolio of cabinet ministers. Useful for all competitive exams. Write 5 GrandsTests on AP Grama/Ward Sachivalayam Only for Rs.99/- Only. List of Ministers of The Cabinet of the Union of India 2019 Ministers of The Cabinet of the Union of India 2019 Download Ministers of The Cabinet of the Union of India 2019 PDF. AP Grama/Ward Sachivalayam related posts Modi's cabinet 2.0: Shah gets home, Rajnath Defence, Nirmala first female finance ministerNEW DELHI: Here's a list of portfolios allocated to cabinet ministers and ministers of state (independent charge): Narendra Modi: Prime Minister and also in charge: Ministry of Personnel, Public Complaints and Pensions; Atomic Energy Department; Department of Space; and all important political issues; and any other tassors not assigned to any minister. CABINET MINISTERS ON 1 OCTOBER 2015. Rajnath Singh: Defence Minister. 2. Amit Shah: Interior Minister. 3. Nitin Jairam Gadkari : Minister of Road Transport and Highways; and Minister for Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. 4. D V Sadananda Gowda: Minister of Chemicals and Fertilisers. 5. Nirmala Sitharaman: Minister of Finance; and Minister of Corporate Affairs. 6. Ramvilas Paswan: Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution. 7. Narendra Singh Tomar: Minister of Agriculture and Agriculture; Minister for Rural Development; and Minister Panchayati Raj. 8. Ravi Shankar Prasad : Minister of Law and Justice; Minister of Communications; and Minister for Electronics and Information Technology. -
Statistical Report After Every General
Cabinet (Election) Department Near Gayatri Mandi, H.E.C., Sector-2 Dhurwa, Ranchi-834004 From the desk of Chief Electoral Officer It is customary to bring out a Statistical Report after every General Election setting out the data on the candidates and the votes polled by them besides information on electorate size and polling stations etc. The present Report presents the statistics pertaining to the General Election to Jharkhand Assembly Constituency 2014. It is hoped that the statistical data contained in this booklet will be useful to all those connected with, or having an interest in, electoral administration, and politics and for researchers. (P.K. Jajoria) Chief Electoral Officer CONTENTS Sl. No. Item Page No. 1 Schedule of General Election to Jharkhand Legislative Assembly 2014 2 Re-poll Details 3 District Election Officers 4 Assembly Constituency wise Returning Officers 5 Assembly Constituency wise Assistant Returning Officers 6 Highlights 7 List of Political Parties That Contested The General Election 2014 To Jharkhand Legislative Assembly 8 Number, Name and Type of Constituencies, No. of Candidates per Constituency, List of Winners with Party Affiliation 9 Nomination Filed, Rejected, Withdrawn And Candidates Contested 10 Number of Cases of Forfeiture of Deposits 11 Performance of Political Parties And Independents 12 Performance of Women Candidates 13 Assembly Constituency Wise Electors 14 Assembly Constituency wise details of Photo Electors, EPIC holders and percentages. 15 Assembly Constituency Wise Electors And Poll Percentage -
Electricity in India
prepa india 21/02/02 12:14 Page 1 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY ELECTRICITY IN INDIA Providing Power for the Millions INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY ELECTRICITY IN INDIA Providing Power for the Millions INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR ENERGY AGENCY ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION 9, rue de la Fédération, AND DEVELOPMENT 75739 Paris, cedex 15, France The International Energy Agency (IEA) is an Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in autonomous body which was established in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came November 1974 within the framework of the into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to implement an Development (OECD) shall promote policies international energy programme. designed: It carries out a comprehensive programme of • To achieve the highest sustainable economic energy co-operation among twenty-six* of the growth and employment and a rising standard OECD’s thirty Member countries. The of living in Member countries, while maintaining basic aims of the IEA are: financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; • To maintain and improve systems for coping • To contribute to sound economic expansion in with oil supply disruptions; Member as well as non-member countries in • To promote rational energy policies in a global the process of economic development; and context through co-operative relations with • To contribute to the expansion of world trade non-member countries, industry and on -
Sixth Report
18 STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT (2011 - 2012) (FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA) MINISTRY OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS Action taken by the Government on the observations/recommendations contained in the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Social Justice and Empowerment (Fifteenth Lok Sabha) on the subject "Implementation of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 – rules made there under" pertaining to the Ministry of Tribal Affairs. EIGHTEENTH REPORT LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI December, 2011/Agrahayana, 1933 (Saka) 1 EIGHTEENTH REPORT STANDING COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT (2011-2012) (FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA) MINISTRY OF TRIBAL AFFAIRS Action taken by the Government on the observations/recommendations contained in the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Social Justice and Empowerment (Fifteenth Lok Sabha) on the subject "Implementation of Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 – rules made there under" pertaining to the Ministry of Tribal Affairs. Presented to Lok Sabha on 22.12.2011 Laid in Rajya Sabha on 22.12.2011 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI December, 2011/Agrahayana, 1933 (Saka) 2 CONTENTS PAGE COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE …………………………………………………… (iv) INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………. (vi) CHAPTER I Report……………………………………………………………… 1 CHAPTER II Observations/Recommendations which have been accepted by 13 the Government…………………………………………………… CHAPTER III Observations/Recommendations which the Committee do not 35 desire to pursue in view of the replies of the Government…… CHAPTER IV Observations/Recommendations in respect of which replies 37 of the Government have not been accepted and have been commented upon by the Committee in Chapter-I ….……….. CHAPTER V Observations/Recommendations in respect of which replies 46 of the Government are interim in nature……………………. -
List of Winning Candidated Final for 16Th
Leading/Winning State PC No PC Name Candidate Leading/Winning Party Andhra Pradesh 1 Adilabad Rathod Ramesh Telugu Desam Andhra Pradesh 2 Peddapalle Dr.G.Vivekanand Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 3 Karimnagar Ponnam Prabhakar Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 4 Nizamabad Madhu Yaskhi Goud Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 5 Zahirabad Suresh Kumar Shetkar Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 6 Medak Vijaya Shanthi .M Telangana Rashtra Samithi Andhra Pradesh 7 Malkajgiri Sarvey Sathyanarayana Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 8 Secundrabad Anjan Kumar Yadav M Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 9 Hyderabad Asaduddin Owaisi All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen Andhra Pradesh 10 Chelvella Jaipal Reddy Sudini Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 11 Mahbubnagar K. Chandrasekhar Rao Telangana Rashtra Samithi Andhra Pradesh 12 Nagarkurnool Dr. Manda Jagannath Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 13 Nalgonda Gutha Sukender Reddy Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 14 Bhongir Komatireddy Raj Gopal Reddy Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 15 Warangal Rajaiah Siricilla Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 16 Mahabubabad P. Balram Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 17 Khammam Nama Nageswara Rao Telugu Desam Kishore Chandra Suryanarayana Andhra Pradesh 18 Aruku Deo Vyricherla Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 19 Srikakulam Killi Krupa Rani Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 20 Vizianagaram Jhansi Lakshmi Botcha Indian National Congress Andhra Pradesh 21 Visakhapatnam Daggubati Purandeswari -
4. Subsidies an All India Perspective
Subsidies: An All-India Perspective An all-India perspective on the extent of subsidies can be provided by putting together subsidy estimates for the Centre and the States. In the ensuing discussion, estimates of budget-based subsidies for the Centre and the States taken together are discussed first, in terms of their overall magnitudes, relative shares of the Centre and the States, the recovery rates and the sectoral shares. A comparison of the major findings for 1994-95 is then made with the previous estimates of subsidies pertaining to 1987-88 and 1992-93. In this chapter, some of the major subsidies in India, like those relating to power, irrigation, health, education and petroleum products are also discussed individually. Centre and States: Aggregate Budget-Based Subsidies An estimate of subsidies emanating from the Central government budget was given in Chapter 2 for 1994-95, while that for the States, as projected on the basis of estimates for 15 major States (1993-94), and four special category States (1994-95) was provided in Chapter 3. An all-India estimate of budget-based subsidies can be obtained by adding the Central and State government subsidies. a. All-India Profile The all-India profile of subsidies is presented in Table 4.1. In 1994-95, aggregate government subsidies (Centre and States) amounted to Rs. 136844 crore, constituting 14.35 per cent of GDP at market prices in that year. Out of this aggregate subsidy, merit subsidies accounted for 23.84 per cent and non-merit subsidies 76.16 per cent, amounting to 3.42 and 10.93 per cent of GDP respectively.