2Eig Lichtarge Lab 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2Eig Lichtarge Lab 2006 Pages 1–8 2eig Evolutionary trace report by report maker September 6, 2008 4.3.1 Alistat 7 4.3.2 CE 7 4.3.3 DSSP 7 4.3.4 HSSP 7 4.3.5 LaTex 7 4.3.6 Muscle 7 4.3.7 Pymol 7 4.4 Note about ET Viewer 7 4.5 Citing this work 8 4.6 About report maker 8 4.7 Attachments 8 1 INTRODUCTION From the original Protein Data Bank entry (PDB id 2eig): Title: Lotus tetragonolobus seed lectin (isoform) Compound: Mol id: 1; molecule: lectin; chain: a, b, c, d Organism, scientific name: Lotus Tetragonolobus; 2eig contains a single unique chain 2eigA (230 residues long) and its homologues 2eigD, 2eigC, and 2eigB. CONTENTS 2 CHAIN 2EIGA 1 Introduction 1 2.1 P19664 overview 2 Chain 2eigA 1 From SwissProt, id P19664, 81% identical to 2eigA: 2.1 P19664 overview 1 Description: Anti-H(O) lectin (LTA). 2.2 Multiple sequence alignment for 2eigA 1 Organism, scientific name: Lotus tetragonolobus (Winged pea) 2.3 Residue ranking in 2eigA 1 (Tetragonolobus purpureus). 2.4 Top ranking residues in 2eigA and their position on Taxonomy: Eukaryota; Viridiplantae; Streptophyta; Embryophyta; the structure 1 Tracheophyta; Spermatophyta; Magnoliophyta; eudicotyledons; core 2.4.1 Clustering of residues at 25% coverage. 2 eudicotyledons; rosids; eurosids I; Fabales; Fabaceae; Papilionoi- 2.4.2 Overlap with known functional surfaces at deae; Loteae; Lotus. 25% coverage. 2 Function: L-fucose specific lectin. 2.4.3 Possible novel functional surfaces at 25% Similarity: Belongs to the leguminous lectin family. coverage. 4 About: This Swiss-Prot entry is copyright. It is produced through a collaboration between the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics and the 3 Notes on using trace results 6 EMBL outstation - the European Bioinformatics Institute. There are 3.1 Coverage 6 no restrictions on its use as long as its content is in no way modified 3.2 Known substitutions 6 and this statement is not removed. 3.3 Surface 6 3.4 Number of contacts 6 2.2 Multiple sequence alignment for 2eigA 3.5 Annotation 6 3.6 Mutation suggestions 6 For the chain 2eigA, the alignment 2eigA.msf (attached) with 61 sequences was used. The alignment was assembled through combi- 4 Appendix 7 nation of BLAST searching on the UniProt database and alignment 4.1 File formats 7 using Muscle program. It can be found in the attachment to this 4.2 Color schemes used 7 report, under the name of 2eigA.msf. Its statistics, from the alistat 4.3 Credits 7 program are the following: 1 Lichtarge lab 2006 Fig. 1. Residues 1-115 in 2eigA colored by their relative importance. (See Appendix, Fig.11, for the coloring scheme.) Fig. 2. Residues 116-230 in 2eigA colored by their relative importance. (See Appendix, Fig.11, for the coloring scheme.) Fig. 3. Residues in 2eigA, colored by their relative importance. Clockwise: Format: MSF front, back, top and bottom views. Number of sequences: 61 Total number of residues: 13061 Smallest: 191 Largest: 230 Average length: 214.1 Alignment length: 230 Average identity: 46% Most related pair: 99% Most unrelated pair: 23% Most distant seq: 40% Furthermore, 1% of residues show as conserved in this alignment. The alignment consists of 98% eukaryotic ( 98% plantae) sequences. (Descriptions of some sequences were not readily availa- ble.) The file containing the sequence descriptions can be found in the attachment, under the name 2eigA.descr. 2.3 Residue ranking in 2eigA The 2eigA sequence is shown in Figs. 1–2, with each residue colored according to its estimated importance. The full listing of residues in 2eigA can be found in the file called 2eigA.ranks sorted in the attachment. 2.4 Top ranking residues in 2eigA and their position on Fig. 4. Residues in 2eigA, colored according to the cluster they belong to: the structure red, followed by blue and yellow are the largest clusters (see Appendix for the coloring scheme). Clockwise: front, back, top and bottom views. The In the following we consider residues ranking among top 25% of resi- corresponding Pymol script is attached. dues in the protein . Figure 3 shows residues in 2eigA colored by their importance: bright red and yellow indicate more conserved/important residues (see Appendix for the coloring scheme). A Pymol script for producing this figure can be found in the attachment. 2.4.1 Clustering of residues at 25% coverage. Fig. 4 shows the top 25% of all residues, this time colored according to clusters they belong to. The clusters in Fig.4 are composed of the residues listed in Table 1. 2 Table 1. cluster size member color residues red 54 3,8,17,28,30,41,42,43,44,45 48,51,59,60,61,62,64,66,68 81,83,84,86,94,102,103,104 105,115,117,118,119,121,138 139,145,161,163,164,165,172 192,200,202,203,204,205,206 207,214,221,222,223,225 Table 1. Clusters of top ranking residues in 2eigA. 2.4.2 Overlap with known functional surfaces at 25% coverage. The name of the ligand is composed of the source PDB identifier and the heteroatom name used in that file. NAG binding site. Table 2 lists the top 25% of residues at the interface with 2eigANAG1001 (nag). The following table (Table 3) suggests possible disruptive replacements for these residues (see Section 3.6). Table 2. Fig. 5. Residues in 2eigA, at the interface with NAG, colored by their relative res type subst’s cvg noc/ dist antn importance. The ligand (NAG) is colored green. Atoms further than 30A˚ away (%) bb (A˚ ) from the geometric center of the ligand, as well as on the line of sight to the 222 S S(98) 0.04 8/0 3.57 site ligand were removed. (See Appendix for the coloring scheme for the protein T(1) chain 2eigA.) Table 2. The top 25% of residues in 2eigA at the interface with Table 4. NAG.(Field names: res: residue number in the PDB entry; type: amino acid continued type; substs: substitutions seen in the alignment; with the percentage of each res type subst’s cvg noc/ dist antn type in the bracket; noc/bb: number of contacts with the ligand, with the num- (%) bb (A˚ ) ber of contacts realized through backbone atoms given in the bracket; dist: E(3) distance of closest apporach to the ligand. ) N(3) 145 S S(63) 0.20 1/0 4.19 P(27) Table 3. L(3) res type disruptive D(1) mutations .(1) 222 S (KR)(FQMWH)(NELPI)(Y) F(1) 118 E E(68) 0.22 4/0 2.19 site Table 3. List of disruptive mutations for the top 25% of residues in 2eigA, V(18) that are at the interface with NAG. A(9) C(1) Figure 5 shows residues in 2eigA colored by their importance, at the F(1) interface with 2eigANAG1001. Manganese (ii) ion binding site. Table 4 lists the top 25% of resi- Table 4. The top 25% of residues in 2eigA at the interface with manga- dues at the interface with 2eigAMN1101 (manganese (ii) ion). The nese (ii) ion.(Field names: res: residue number in the PDB entry; type: amino following table (Table 5) suggests possible disruptive replacements acid type; substs: substitutions seen in the alignment; with the percentage of for these residues (see Section 3.6). each type in the bracket; noc/bb: number of contacts with the ligand, with the number of contacts realized through backbone atoms given in the bracket; Table 4. dist: distance of closest apporach to the ligand. ) res type subst’s cvg noc/ dist antn (%) bb (A˚ ) 127 D D(63) 0.19 5/1 2.15 site Table 5. .(19) res type disruptive S(9) mutations continued in next column continued in next column 3 Table 5. continued type in the bracket; noc/bb: number of contacts with the ligand, with the num- res type disruptive ber of contacts realized through backbone atoms given in the bracket; dist: mutations distance of closest apporach to the ligand. ) 127 D (R)(FWH)(Y)(VCAG) 145 S (R)(K)(H)(Q) 118 E (HR)(Y)(FW)(K) Table 7. res type disruptive mutations Table 5. List of disruptive mutations for the top 25% of residues in 2eigA, that are at the interface with manganese (ii) ion. 127 D (R)(FWH)(Y)(VCAG) Table 7. List of disruptive mutations for the top 25% of residues in 2eigA, that are at the interface with calcium ion. Fig. 6. Residues in 2eigA, at the interface with manganese (ii) ion, colored by their relative importance. The ligand (manganese (ii) ion) is colored green. Atoms further than 30A˚ away from the geometric center of the ligand, as well as on the line of sight to the ligand were removed. (See Appendix for the Fig. 7. Residues in 2eigA, at the interface with calcium ion, colored by their coloring scheme for the protein chain 2eigA.) relative importance. The ligand (calcium ion) is colored green. Atoms further than 30A˚ away from the geometric center of the ligand, as well as on the line of sight to the ligand were removed. (See Appendix for the coloring scheme Figure 6 shows residues in 2eigA colored by their importance, at the for the protein chain 2eigA.) interface with 2eigAMN1101. Calcium ion binding site. Table 6 lists the top 25% of residues at the interface with 2eigACA1102 (calcium ion). The following table Figure 7 shows residues in 2eigA colored by their importance, at the (Table 7) suggests possible disruptive replacements for these residues interface with 2eigACA1102.
Recommended publications
  • Tesis L Baena.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA DEPARTAMENTO DE BOTÁNICA TESIS DOCTORAL TRATAMIENTO DE LAS BASES DE DATOS DEL HERBARIO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA (GDA) COMO FUENTE PARA ESTUDIOS DE BIODIVERSIDAD: ENSAYO EN DETERMINADAS FAMILIAS DE ANGIOSPERMAS DICOTILEDÓNEAS DE LA PROVINCIA DE GRANADA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE, CISTACEAE, CRUCIFERAE, CHENOPODIACEAE, ERICACEAE, LEGUMINOSAE, PAPAVERACEAE Y RANUNCULACEAE) LAURA BAENA COBOS GRANADA 2003 HERBARIO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA Editor: Editorial de la Universidad de Granada Autor: Laura Baena Cobos D.L.: Gr. 295 - 2006 ISBN: 84-338-3719-2 UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA DEPARTAMENTO DE BOTÁNICA TRATAMIENTO DE LAS BASES DE DATOS DEL HERBARIO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA (GDA) COMO FUENTE PARA ESTUDIOS DE BIODIVERSIDAD: ENSAYO EN DETERMINADAS FAMILIAS DE ANGIOSPERMAS DICOTILEDÓNEAS DE LA PROVINCIA DE GRANADA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE, CISTACEAE, CRUCIFERAE, CHENOPODIACEAE, ERICACEAE, LEGUMINOSAE, PAPAVERACEAE Y RANUNCULACEAE) LAURA BAENA COBOS TESIS DOCTORAL GRANADA, OCTUBRE DE 2003 TRATAMIENTO DE LAS BASES DE DATOS DEL HERBARIO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE GRANADA (GDA) COMO FUENTE PARA ESTUDIOS DE BIODIVERSIDAD: ENSAYO EN DETERMINADAS FAMILIAS DE ANGIOSPERMAS DICOTILEDÓNEAS DE LA PROVINCIA DE GRANADA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE, CISTACEAE, CRUCIFERAE, CHENOPODIACEAE, ERICACEAE, LEGUMINOSAE, PAPAVERACEAE Y RANUNCULACEAE) Memoria que presenta la licenciada Laura Baena Cobos para aspirar al grado académico de Doctora en Ciencias Biológicas por la Universidad de Granada Laura Baena Cobos VºBº de las directoras: Fdo: Dra. Mª Concepción Morales Torres Fdo.: Dra. Carmen Quesada Ochoa TESIS DOCTORAL GRANADA, OCTUBRE DE 2003 Agradecimientos A mis queridas Concha y Carmen, mis maestras. Mujeres sabias y luchadoras donde las haya, predicáis con el ejemplo, gracias por muchísimas cosas, que queréis que os diga… me habéis visto crecer en el Herbario.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae): Evidence from Nrits Sequences and Morphology
    813 Phylogeny of the genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae): evidence from nrITS sequences and morphology G.V. Degtjareva, T.E. Kramina, D.D. Sokoloff, T.H. Samigullin, C.M. Valiejo-Roman, and A.S. Antonov Abstract: Lotus (120–130 species) is the largest genus of the tribe Loteae. The taxonomy of Lotus is complicated, and a comprehensive taxonomic revision of the genus is needed. We have conducted phylogenetic analyses of Lotus based on nrITS data alone and combined with data on 46 morphological characters. Eighty-one ingroup nrITS accessions represent- ing 71 Lotus species are studied; among them 47 accessions representing 40 species are new. Representatives of all other genera of the tribe Loteae are included in the outgroup (for three genera, nrITS sequences are published for the first time). Forty-two of 71 ingroup species were not included in previous morphological phylogenetic studies. The most important conclusions of the present study are (1) addition of morphological data to the nrITS matrix produces a better resolved phy- logeny of Lotus; (2) previous findings that Dorycnium and Tetragonolobus cannot be separated from Lotus at the generic level are well supported; (3) Lotus creticus should be placed in section Pedrosia rather than in section Lotea; (4) a broad treatment of section Ononidium is unnatural and the section should possibly not be recognized at all; (5) section Heineke- nia is paraphyletic; (6) section Lotus should include Lotus conimbricensis; then the section is monophyletic; (7) a basic chromosome number of x = 6 is an important synapomorphy for the expanded section Lotus; (8) the segregation of Lotus schimperi and allies into section Chamaelotus is well supported; (9) there is an apparent functional correlation be- tween stylodium and keel evolution in Lotus.
    [Show full text]
  • ZNIEFF Continentales : Liste Des Espèces De Flore Déterminantes En Région PACA
    Actualisation de l’inventaire des Zones Naturelles d’Intérêt Écologique, Faunistique et Floristique (ZNIEFF) de Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur ZNIEFF continentales : liste des espèces de flore déterminantes en région PACA Version du 28/07/2016 Référentiel taxonomique : TAXREF v5.0 Les alismatales PHYLUM CLASSE ORDRE FAMILLE CD_REF RANG NOM_VALIDE Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Alismataceae 85486 ES Baldellia ranunculoides (L.) Parl., 1854 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Alismataceae 160264 SSES Damasonium alisma Mill. subsp. polyspermum (Coss.) Maire Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Alismataceae 119860 ES Sagittaria sagittifolia L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Butomaceae 87136 ES Butomus umbellatus L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Hydrocharitaceae 103120 ES Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Hydrocharitaceae 128504 ES Vallisneria spiralis L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Juncaginaceae 141931 SSES Triglochin bulbosum subsp. barrelieri (Loisel.) Rouy, 1912 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Juncaginaceae 127546 ES Triglochin maritimum L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 81869 ES Althenia filiformis Petit, 1829 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 115228 ES Potamogeton alpinus Balb., 1804 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 115237 ES Potamogeton coloratus Hornem., 1813 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 115258 ES Potamogeton gramineus L., 1753 Plantae Equisetopsida Alismatales Potamogetonaceae 115296 ES Potamogeton
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Mediterranea 26
    FLORA MEDITERRANEA 26 Published under the auspices of OPTIMA by the Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum Palermo – 2016 FLORA MEDITERRANEA Edited on behalf of the International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo by Francesco M. Raimondo, Werner Greuter & Gianniantonio Domina Editorial board G. Domina (Palermo), F. Garbari (Pisa), W. Greuter (Berlin), S. L. Jury (Reading), G. Kamari (Patras), P. Mazzola (Palermo), S. Pignatti (Roma), F. M. Raimondo (Palermo), C. Salmeri (Palermo), B. Valdés (Sevilla), G. Venturella (Palermo). Advisory Committee P. V. Arrigoni (Firenze) P. Küpfer (Neuchatel) H. M. Burdet (Genève) J. Mathez (Montpellier) A. Carapezza (Palermo) G. Moggi (Firenze) C. D. K. Cook (Zurich) E. Nardi (Firenze) R. Courtecuisse (Lille) P. L. Nimis (Trieste) V. Demoulin (Liège) D. Phitos (Patras) F. Ehrendorfer (Wien) L. Poldini (Trieste) M. Erben (Munchen) R. M. Ros Espín (Murcia) G. Giaccone (Catania) A. Strid (Copenhagen) V. H. Heywood (Reading) B. Zimmer (Berlin) Editorial Office Editorial assistance: A. M. Mannino Editorial secretariat: V. Spadaro & P. Campisi Layout & Tecnical editing: E. Di Gristina & F. La Sorte Design: V. Magro & L. C. Raimondo Redazione di "Flora Mediterranea" Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum, Università di Palermo Via Lincoln, 2 I-90133 Palermo, Italy [email protected] Printed by Luxograph s.r.l., Piazza Bartolomeo da Messina, 2/E - Palermo Registration at Tribunale di Palermo, no. 27 of 12 July 1991 ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online DOI: 10.7320/FlMedit26.001 Copyright © by International Foundation pro Herbario Mediterraneo, Palermo Contents V. Hugonnot & L. Chavoutier: A modern record of one of the rarest European mosses, Ptychomitrium incurvum (Ptychomitriaceae), in Eastern Pyrenees, France . 5 P. Chène, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Lotus Scoparius (Nutt. in Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley [= Acmispon Glaber
    SPECIES Lotus scoparius (Nutt. in Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley [= Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet] NRCS CODE: Tribe: Loteae LOSC2 Subfamily: Papilionoideae LOSCS2 Family: Fabaceae LOSCB Order: Fabales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida LOSCB , Riverside Co., A. Montalvo 2009 LOSCS2, Monterey coast, A. Montalvo 2003 LOSCB, Riverside Co., A. Montalvo 2010, Subspecific taxa 1. LOSCS2 1. Lotus scoparius var. scoparius 2. LOSCB 2. Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. brevialatus Ottley Synonyms 1. Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet var. glaber [New name in Jepson Manual 2nd Edition, JepsonOnline 2010] Hosackia scoparia Nutt. in T. and G. (taxa numbered as above) H. glaber Greene H. crassifolia Nutt., not Benth L. glaber Greene, not Mill. L. scoparius (Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley L. scoparius (Nutt. in T. & G.) Ottley ssp. scoparius (Ottley) Munz Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. perplexans Hoover p.p. Syrmatium glabrum Vogel 2. Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet var. brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet [New name in Jepson Manual 2nd Edition] Hosackia glabra (Vogel) Torr. var. brevialata (Ottley) Abrams Lotus scoparius (Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley var. brevialatus Ottley Lotus scoparius (Nutt. in T. & G.) Ottley ssp. brevialatus (Ottley) Munz Common name General for species: California broom, deerweed 1. coastal deerweed, common deerweed (taxa numbered as above) 2. desert deerweed, western bird's foot trefoil, short-winged deerweed (Roberts 2008, Painter 2009, USDA PLANTS 2010). Over 45 taxa of Lotus were recognized in Isely's treatment in Hickman (1993) for California. These taxa had been grouped and regrouped into various species as well as subgenera or genera based on morphology for over a century. Allan & Porter (2000) analyzed DNA (ITS and nuclear ribosomal DNA), geographic, and morphological data for more than 45 taxa of Lotus together with additional related taxa of Loteae and found several geographically distinct lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Конспект Родини Fabaceae У Флорі України. II. Підродина Faboideae (Триби Galegeae, Hedysareae, Loteae, Cicereae) Микола М
    Систематика, флористика, географія рослин Plant Taxonomy, Geography and Floristics https://doi.org/10.15407/ukrbotj75.04.305 Конспект родини Fabaceae у флорі України. II. Підродина Faboideae (триби Galegeae, Hedysareae, Loteae, Cicereae) Микола М. ФЕДОРОНЧУК, Сергій Л. МОСЯКІН Інститут ботаніки ім. М.Г. Холодного НАН України вул. Терещенківська, 2, Київ 01004, Україна Fedoronchuk M.M., Mosyakin S.L. A synopsis of the family Fabaceae in the flora of Ukraine. II. Subfamily Faboideae (tribes Galegeae, Hedysareae, Loteae, and Cicereae). Ukr. Bot. J., 2018, 75(4): 305–321. M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 2 Tereshchenkivska Str., Kyiv 01004, Ukraine Abstract. The article provides a synopsis of tribes Galegeae, Hedysareae, Loteae, Cicereae of Fabaceae subfam. Faboideae in the flora of Ukraine, with nomenclatural citations, types, and main synonyms. It is based on critical analysis of available data of taxonomic, morphological, and molecular phylogenetic studies. Tribe Galegeae is best represented in the flora of Ukraine, comprising 10 genera, including the most species-rich genus Astragalus (48 species). However, the number of genera in the tribe will be probably changed due to further results of morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies which already indicate possible inclusion of Calophaca and Halimodendron in Caragana s. l.; however, these data require confirmation. Tribe Loteae is accepted here in a wide circumscription, including Coronilleae, which is in accordance with results of new morphological and molecular studies. There are 9 genera (or 7, in a wider circumscription) in the tribe, but the number of natural genera in that group will be clarified after further studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Vegetables & Herbs Easy to Grow in Southern California
    Florence Nishida lagreengrounds.org March 2020 Asian Vegetables & Herbs Easy to Grow in Southern California Name Planting Need Pot Comments time support ok Legumes Snow Peas (Pisum sativum, var. macrocarpon Cool y/n y Bush and pole varieties ​ ​ ​ Spr/Fall Pea shoots – various Spr/Fall y y Pick young, not tendrils Soya Bean (Glycine max) Spr n n Pull up plant for dried ​ ​ Yard Long Bean (Vigna unguiculata ssp. Sesquipedalis) Warm y y Long harvest, keep picked ​ ​ ​ ​ spr Lab Lab Beans (Lab Lab purpureus, Dolichos lab lab), Warm y/n n Can be a perennial if no ​ ​ Hyacinth Bean spr, frost. Contains cyanogenic summer glycosides, eat young or boil mature beans. Winged Bean/Pea (Tetragonolobus purpureus) Cool n y Fast maturing, pretty ​ ​ Brassicas, Headed Chinese cabbage, Napa cabbage (Brassica rapa var. Late n n Fresh – mild sweet flavor, ​ ​ pekinensis) summer, sev. cultivars ​ fall Pak choi/ Bok choy (Brassica rapa var. chinensis), Spring n y Fast-grower, good for ​ ​ ​ ​ celery cabbage inter-cropping, harvest whole or lvs Rosette pak choi (Brassica chinensis var. narinosa), Mid n y Neat, compact, harvest ​ ​ ​ ​ ‘Tatsoi’, ‘Taisai’ summer, leaves or whole fall Flowering Stalk Brassicas Chinese broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra) Late spr- n n Young flowering stems and ​ ​ ​ ​ ‘Gai lan’ fall buds Komatsuna (Brassica rapa var. komatsuna) Mustard Late n n Flavor bet. cabbage and ​ ​ ​ ​ spinach spr-fall mustard; eat whole or leaves Mustard Greens Mizuna (Brassica rapa var. japonica), green, red Fall- n y Mild flavored, pretty, pick ​ ​ ​ ​ varieties spring leaves Japanese Giant Red Mustard (Brassica juncea), Osaka Fall-Sprin n y/n Gorgeous, very spicy-hot ​ ​ Purple Mustard (B.
    [Show full text]
  • Psophocarpus Tetragonolobus: an Underused Species with Multiple Potential Uses
    plants Review Psophocarpus tetragonolobus: An Underused Species with Multiple Potential Uses Hussein Bassal 1,2 , Othmane Merah 3,4,* , Aqeel M. Ali 5, Akram Hijazi 1,* and Fawaz El Omar 6 1 Doctoral School of Science and Technology, Research Platform for Environmental Science (PRASE), Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Molecular Immunology, Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath-Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon 3 Laboratoire de Chimie Agro-industrielle, LCA, Université de Toulouse, INRA, 31030 Toulouse, France 4 Département Génie Biologique, Université Paul Sabatier, IUT A, 32000 Auch, France 5 Department of Biology, College of Science, Al Mustansiriya University, Baghdad, Iraq; [email protected] 6 Doctoral School of Science and Technology, Lebanese University, EDST, Hadath, Beirut, Lebanon; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (O.M.); [email protected] (A.H.) Received: 26 October 2020; Accepted: 6 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: Natural products, particularly those extracted from plants, have been used as therapy for different diseases for thousands of years. The first written records on the plants used in natural medicine, referred to as “medicinal plants”, go back to about 2600 BC. A thorough and complete understanding of medicinal plants encompasses a multiplex of overlapping and integrated sciences such as botany, pharmacognosy, chemistry, enzymology and genetics. Psophocarpus tetragonolobus, a member of Fabaceae family also called winged bean, is a perennial herbaceous plant characterized by its tuberous roots and its winged pod twinning and a perennial legume rich in proteins, oils, vitamins and carbohydrates. Besides nutrients, winged bean also contains bioactive compounds that have therapeutic activities like anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, antibacterial, antifungal, antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity, a few of which already been reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Press, Vol. 19, No. 4
    Department of Botany & the U.S. National Herbarium The Plant Press New Series - Vol. 19 - No. 4 October-December 2016 Botany Profile We Are All Lichens By Manuela Dal Forno o you remember the question in biomes revealed the existence of diverse not always been a highly visible field Introductory Biology 101, “What communities of bacteria in addition to the and people are not generally aware Dare lichens?” According to tradi- two dominant partners (Gonzáles et al. that lichens are a significant part of the tional concepts, a lichen is the resulting 2005 FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 54: 401–415; ecosystem. structure (known as a thallus) from the Cardinale et al. 2006 FEMS Microbiol. symbiosis between a fungal partner (the Ecol. 57: 484–495, Cardinale et al. 2008 n September, a recent paper about mycobiont) and an algal-like partner (the FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 66: 63–71). Most “plant blindness” (Balding & Wil- photobiont), either a green alga and/or of these studies have focused on bacte- Iliams 2016 Conserv. Biol.) and a cyanobacterium (“blue-green alga”). rial diversity and their potential roles in follow-up commentary article (Das- Lichens play important roles in the the lichenization process (Grube et al. gupta 2016 https://news.mongabay. environments they live in, participating 2009 ISME J. 3: 1105–1115; Hodkinson com/2016/09/can-plant-blindness-be- in nutrient and water cycles and particu- & Lutzoni 2009 Symbiosis 49: 163–180; cured/) was circulated among cowork- larly nitrogen fixation, forming biologi- Bates et al. 2011 Appl. Environ. Microbiol. ers in the Smithsonian’s Department cal soil crusts, and serving for animals 77: 1309–1314; Hodkinson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Acmispon Glaber (Vogel) Brouillet [Updated 2017] = Lotus Scoparius (Nutt
    I. SPECIES Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet [Updated 2017] = Lotus scoparius (Nutt. in Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley NRCS CODE: [none for Tribe: Loteae Family: Fabaceae Subclass: Rosidae Acmispon] Subfamily: Papilionoideae Order: Fabales Class: Magnoliopsida [LOSC2 code for L. 4 mm scoparius ] Acmispon glaber var. brevialatus [= Lotus scoparius var. brevialatus] 15 mm seedling with linear cotyledons and first pair of true leaves 4 mm Acmispon glaber var. glaber erect form prostrate form on Monterey coast A. Subspecific taxa 1. no NRCS code 1. Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet var. glaber 2. no NRCS code 2. Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet var. brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet [accepted by Baldwin et al. (2012), Jepson eFlora (2017)] B. Common name General for species: deerweed, California broom 1. coastal deerweed, common deerweed, deerweed, coastal deerbroom (taxa numbered as above; 2. short-winged deerweed, desert deerweed, desert deerbroom, western bird's foot trefoil names listed first used below) (Roberts 2008, Allen & Roberts 2013, Calflora 2016, USDA PLANTS 2016). Last modified: 10/19/2018 LOSC2 Update, 1 Printed: 10/19/2018 C. Synonyms 1. LOSCS2 1. Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. scoparius Hosackia scoparia Nutt. in T. and G. H. glaber Greene H. crassifolia Nutt., not Benth L. glaber Greene, not Mill. L. scoparius (Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley L. scoparius (Nutt. in T. & G.) Ottley ssp. scoparius (Ottley) Munz Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. perplexans Hoover p.p. Syrmatium glabrum Vogel 2. LOSCB 2. Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. brevialatus Ottley (taxa numbered as above) Hosackia glabra (Vogel) Torr. var. brevialata (Ottley) Abrams Lotus scoparius (Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley var. brevialatus Ottley Lotus scoparius (Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Inventory No. 173
    Plant Inventory No. 173 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Washington, D.C., March 1969 UCED JANUARY 1 to DECEMBER 31, 1965 (N( >. 303628 to 310335) MAY 2 6 1969 CONTENTS Page Inventory 8 Index of common and scientific names 257 This inventory, No. 173, lists the plant material (Nos. 303628 to 310335) received by the New Crops Research Branch, Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, during the period from January 1 to December 31, 1965. The inventory is a historical record of plant material introduced for Department and other specialists and is not to be considered as a list of plant ma- terial for distribution. The species names used are those under which the plant ma- terial was received. These have been corrected only for spelling, authorities, and obvious synonymy. Questions related to the names published in the inventory and obvious errors should be directed to the author. If misidentification is apparent, please submit an herbarium specimen with flowers and fruit for reidentification. HOWARD L. HYLAND Botanist Plant Industry Station Beltsville, Md. INVENTORY 303628. DIGITARIA DIDACTYLA Willd. var DECALVATA Henr. Gramineae. From Australia. Plants presented by the Commonwealth Scientific and In- dustrial Research Organization, Canberra. Received Jan. 8, 1965. Grown at West Ryde, Sydney. 303629. BRASSICA OLERACEA var. CAPITATA L. Cruciferae. Cabbage. From the Republic of South Africa. Seeds presented by Chief, Division of Plant and Seed Control, Department of Agricultural Technical Services, Pretoria. Received Jan. 11, 1965. Cabbage Number 20. 303630 to 303634. TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. Gramineae. From Australia. Seeds presented by the Agricultural College, Roseworthy. Received Jan. 11,1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Relationships Between Old World
    © Landesmuseum für Kärnten; download www.landesmuseum.ktn.gv.at/wulfenia; www.biologiezentrum.at Wulfenia 10 (2003): 15–50 Mitteilungen des Kärntner Botanikzentrums Klagenfurt Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships between Old World and New World members of the tribe Loteae (Leguminosae): new insights from molecular and morphological data, with special emphasis on Ornithopus Galina V. Degtjareva, Carmen M. Valiejo-Roman, Tatiana E. Kramina, Evgeny M. Mironov, Tahir H. Samigullin & Dmitry D. Sokoloff Summary: The tribe Loteae s.l. (incl. Coronilleae) comprises about 275 species distributed in Eurasia, Africa, Australia, North and South America. 47 species of Loteae are endemic to the New World, while all others are restricted to the Old World. Main centres of diversity are Mediterranean region and California. The genus Ornithopus has an unusual disjunctive distribution, with one species (O. micranthus) in subtropical regions of Eastern South America and five species in Europe, Mediterranean region, Macaronesia and the Caucasus. We have produced sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS1-2 region of six Loteae species, and have studied fruit anatomy, pollen morphology and other morphological characters in several members of the tribe, with special emphasis on Ornithopus. Our data confirm that the genus Ornithopus, in its traditional circum- scription, represents a natural, monophyletic group. The ITS data strongly suggest sister group relationships between O. micranthus and Old World species of Ornithopus. We have confirmed results by ALLAN & PORTER (2000) and ALLAN et al. (2003) that Ornithopus tend to group with North American genus Hosackia on trees inferred from analyses of ITS sequences. There is little morphological support for such a grouping.
    [Show full text]