Biologia 68/6: 1155—1162, 2013 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-013-0272-5
Helminth communities in the burrowing toad, Rhinella fernandezae, from Northeastern Argentina
Monika Inés Hamann, Arturo Ignacio Kehr & Cynthya Elizabeth González
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral, Ruta 5 Km 2.5, W 3400 AMD, Corrientes, Argentina; e-mail: monika [email protected]
Abstract: The main goals of this study were to determine the richness and diversity of helminth parasites of Rhinella fernandezae at the component and infracommunity levels and determine the ecological implications of different biotic and abiotic factors. Specimens were collected near the city of Corrientes, Corrientes Province, Argentina. Prevalence of infection was 94% in the specimens examined (n = 65). The helminth component community in R. fernandezae in this area was comprised a total of 22 species. Of all helminth species, only three (Catadiscus inopinatus, Cosmocerca podicipinus and C. parva) were dominant (importance value: I > 1.0) in the community. The most abundant species were B. tetracotyloides (d = 0.43) among the larvae and C. podicipinus (d = 0.09) among adult worms. At the infracommunity level, the mean individual species richness (2.28 ± 1.48) (mean ± SD) was no more than 3 helminth species per infected host; the diversity and equitability of helminths were 0.23 ± 0.21 and 0.48 ± 0.38, respectively. The host body size was the main factor in determining the parasite abundance. Species richness was significantly and positively correlated with host body size. The parasite helminth species predominantly showed an overdispersed pattern of distribution. Helminth species showed two negative and significant pairs of covariation and one significant pair of association (P < 0.05). R. fernandezae has a wide variety of parasites relating to the host microhabitat, mobility and feeding habits. Key words: ecology; parasites; amphibian; Bufonidae; Rhinella fernandezae; Argentina
Introduction their host and environment, which underlie the struc- ture of the helminth community, are still scarce During the last few years, studies about helminth par- (Hamann et al. 2006a, b, 2010, 2012). Specifically, ex- asite communities of Argentinean amphibians have be- tensive examination of many additional host species come more frequent. These studies have contributed to is needed before the helminth diversity of Argen- the understanding the patterns and processes involved tinean amphibians can be adequately known, as well in helminth community structure, and the role of para- as for making robust predictions about parasite speci- site in the ecosystems. In this context, extrinsic factors ficity (generalist vs. specialist), importance of a species such as anthropogenic disturbance (e.g., environments within the community, e.g., dominant helminth species, perturbed by intensive agricultural activity) and natu- and characteristics of the helminth communities (inter- ral habitat conditions are keys for helminth community active vs. isolationist). Likewise, the spatial and tem- organization in host amphibians (Hamann et al. 2006b). poral variations of larval parasites and the coloniza- At the same time, intrinsic factors such as reproductive tion abilities of parasites which could also influence the cycle of the host, relative vagility, feeding preference in parasite assemblage in the definitive host (Esch et al. terms of foraging behaviour, range of prey species, host 2002). So far, the present study is the first one investi- body size, and the life cycle of parasite are key fac- gating the ecological aspects of all groups of parasitic tors determining parasite abundance and species rich- helminths (i.e., platyhelminths, nematodes and acan- ness (Hamann et al. 2006a, b, 2010, 2012, 2013). This thocephalan) in terrestrial amphibians from Argentina, variety of processes related to the parasites, their host at the component and infracommunity levels. or its habitat have been identified by several authors Based on certain assumptions, the approach em- (Goater et al. 1987; Aho 1990; Muzzall 1991; McAlpine ployed in the current study predicted that (1) the di- 1997; Bolek & Coggins 2003; Yoder & Coggins 2007; versity of the helminth parasite community is deter- Marcogliese et al. 2009) as causes of the depauperate, mined by given habitat and the reproductive cycle of and high variability of the helminth communities in am- the host; (2) the helminth parasite populations may phibians from temperate latitudes. serve as markers of diet of the host; and (3) terrestrial In our region, despite the existence of a greatly amphibians mostly host the greater number of nema- diverse amphibian fauna (Frost 2011), studies that fo- tode species than aquatic amphibians. These premises cus on the ecological interrelationships of the helminths, are tested through analysis of the helminth parasite