Evaluation of Norway's Anti-Corruption Efforts As Part of Its

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Report 5 / 2020 ANNEX 5 Evaluation of Norway’s Anti-Corruption Efforts as part of its Development Policy and Assistance Commissioned by The Evaluation Department Carried out by Nordic Consulting Group (NCG) Written by Ch. Vaillant, M. Buch Christensen, M. Pyman, G. Sundet, L. Smed Quality assurance by O. Winckler Andersen This report is the product of the authors, and responsibility for the accuracy of data included in this report rests with the authors alone. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions presented in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the Evaluation Department. September 2020 ISBN 978-82-8369-044-6 Annex 5: Case study reports 5.1 Country Case Study: Somalia 5.2 Thematic Sector Case Study: The Health Sector 5.3 Thematic Sector Case Study: Climate & Forestry 5.4 Zero-Tolerance Case Study 5.5 Global Case Study: Linking Norway’s Global Advocacy with the Development Agenda I. Country Case Study - Somalia 1 I. Country Case Study: Somalia 2 Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Limitations............................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Structure of the Report ........................................................................................................... 6 2. Context ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Overview of the Somalia Context ........................................................................................... 6 2.2 Corruption Issues in Somalia ................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Somalia’s AC Agenda ............................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Norway’s Development Assistance in Somalia ..................................................................... 10 3. Norway’s AC Efforts as Part of its Development Agenda in Somalia ...................................... 14 3.1 The Zero-Tolerance Policy in Somalia: Focus on Partners .................................................... 14 3.2 The Use of Country Systems, Link with ZTP and Spill-Over Effects....................................... 17 3.3 Operationalising AC as a Cross-Cutting Issue ........................................................................ 19 3.4 Support to PFM Reforms and Likely Contribution to AC ...................................................... 20 3.5 AC and Policy Dialogue.......................................................................................................... 23 4. Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................................... 24 4.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 25 Annex 1: List of People Consulted ............................................................................................... 29 Annex 2: Bibliography ................................................................................................................ 30 3 List of Abbreviations AC Anti-Corruption ASI Adam Smith International DFID Department for International Development EU European Union FGC Financial Governance Committee FGS Federal Government of Somalia HIPC Heavily Indebted Poor Country GDP Gross Domestic Product IDI INTOSAI Development Initiative IDP Internally displaced people IFF Illicit Financial Flows IMF International Monetary Fund INTOSAI International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions JPLG Joint Programme for Local Governance MAF Mutual Accountability Framework MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MoU Memorandum of Understanding MPF Multi-Partner Fund (World Bank) MPTF Multi-Partner Trust Fund (UN) NGO Non-governmental organisation NIS Nordic International Support NRC Norwegian Refugee Council Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation OAG Office of the Auditor General ODA Official Development Assistance OfD Oil for Development OECD DAC Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s Development Assistance Committee PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability PFM Public Financial Management SDRF Somalia Development and Reconstruction Facility SMP Staff Monitored Programme SFF Special Financing Facility SSF Somalia Stability Fund TI Transparency International UK United Kingdom UN United Nations UNCAC United Nations Convention against Corruption UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime USA United States of America ZTP Zero-tolerance policy 4 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose This country case study evaluates Norway’s Anti-Corruption (AC) efforts in Somalia over the review period (2010-19) across all four AC categories, namely: (1) Upholding the principle of zero tolerance for corruption in Norwegian development assistance; (2) AC as a cross-cutting issue, seeking to avoid corruption resulting from Norwegian development assistance; (3) AC as a distinct component of Norwegian development assistance, both through programmes/projects and through partner dialogue; and (4) Strengthening international norms and standards against corruption, including prevention of Illicit Financial Flows (IFF).1 Norway’s official development assistance (ODA) has increasingly been allocated to fragile states. These face a unique set of circumstances, often characterised by high-level and systemic corruption, links with global terrorism, and – from a development point of view – a limited availability of eligible partners.Some of the factors justifying the choice of Somalia as a country case study was the steady increase in Norwegian ODA allocated to this country over the review period as well as the broad range of sectors and partners characterising Norway’s aid portfolio in this country. 1.2 Methodology The case study assesses AC efforts from a country-level perspective, based on an analysis of the Somalia context. The findings of the case study are drawn from a thorough triangulation of evidence, using different data collection methods and sources. The evaluation team travelled to Kenya/Nairobi and Somalia/Mogadishu in the week commencing 6 December 2019 to meet with a range of stakeholders, including Government Ministries, donors and multilateral agencies, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and independent experts. Follow-up interviews were conducted by phone after the visit (see full list of people met and bibliography in Annexes 1 and 2). The following programmes and/or partners constitute the main sample for the case study2: • All Norwegian humanitarian assistance received by the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) (Flyktninghjelpen) under its Global Partnership Agreement with Norway; • All Norwegian assistance received by the Nordic International Support (NIS) foundation; a Norwegian NGO, which the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) helped set up in 2011- 12, and which has since become an important partner; • The Special Financing Facility (SFF), an innovative bridge facility led and administered by the Norwegian MFA in 2013-14 to support the federal government; • The Somalia Stability Fund (SSF), which has been administered by the Norwegian MFA since its launch in 2012, with the United Kingdom (UK) Department for International Development (DFID) as agreement partner and Adam Smith International (ASI) as implementing partner; • The United Nations (UN) Multi-Partner Trust Fund (MPTF), which is managed by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and which obtained renewed support in 2018; and 1 See Terms of Reference. 2 These programmes and/or partners were selected using the following selection criteria: (i) coverage of partners (ii) coverage of sectors (iii) strength of evidence, including access to key stakeholders and level of documentation received during data collection 5 • The World Bank Multi-Partner Fund (MPF), which Norway has supported since its launch in 2015, and which obtained renewed support in 2018. 1.3 Limitations The case study has some limitations in scope and in methodology. In terms of the scope, the following limitations should be noted: • The case study focuses only on Norway’s support to Somalia as a federal state. The earmarked support to member states, including Somaliland and Puntland, is not covered; and • The case study does not take into account the significant proportion of Norwegian (unallocated) aid money channelled to Somalia through multilateral channels.3 In terms of methodology, the following limitations should be noted: • The evaluation team had limited time in Nairobi, Kenya (where the Norwegian Embassy and other key stakeholders are based) and in Mogadishu, Somalia4; • The evidence on the state of corruption, Public Financial Management (PFM) and other issues over the review period remains partial, with some reports commissioned by donors declared confidential;
Recommended publications
  • UN-Habitat Supporting Brazil Favela Peace Programme Reprinted and Translated Articles Should Communities Making New Be Credited “Reprinted from Urban World”

    UN-Habitat Supporting Brazil Favela Peace Programme Reprinted and Translated Articles Should Communities Making New Be Credited “Reprinted from Urban World”

    urban WWORLDORLD February - April 2011 Cities and Land Rights Volume 3 Issue 1 Volume urban CONTENTS WORLD OPINION IN-FOCUS www.unhabitat.org © 2011 UN-HABITAT 21 Africa 4 Message from the UN-HABITAT A big boost for energy efficient P.O.Box 30030, GPO Executive Director Nairobi 00100, Kenya buildings in East Africa Tel. (254-20) 762 3120 Fax. (254-20) 762 3477 COVER STORY A field trip to remember for E-mail: [email protected] Mozambique architecture EDITOR: Roman Rollnick students CITIES AND LAND RIGHTS EDITORIAL BOARD African Development Bank Anantha Krishnan 5 Land and climate change Christine Auclair boosts Lake Victoria urban Andre Dzikus in a new urban world Edlam Abera Yemeru water programme Eduardo López Moreno Mohamed El Sioufi Jane Nyakairu Helping young people in Lucia Kiwala Mariam Yunusa 8 African ministerial meeting Zanzibar Mohamed El-Sioufi adopts new action plan Naison Mutizwa-Mangiza World Water Week Oyebanji Oyeyinka (Chair) Remy Sietchiping Raf Tuts 22 Asia-Pacific EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS: Flossie Mbiriri, 10 Five years into the Global Japanese generosity Tom Osanjo Land Tool Network (GLTN) COVER DESIGN – a perspective from our Housing support in Andrew Ondoo partners around the world Sri Lanka ADVERTISING Eirik Sorlie To advertise in Urban World, please contact: Thanks to BASF, a new major [email protected] water project for schools 15 Land governance for rapid SUBSCRIPTIONS urbanization Contact: 23 Latin America and the Clarissa Augustinus and [email protected] Caribbean Eirik Sorlie REPRINTS UN-HABITAT supporting Brazil favela peace programme Reprinted and translated articles should Communities making new be credited “Reprinted from Urban World”.
  • Evaluation of the Strategy for Norway's Culture and Sports Cooperation

    Evaluation of the Strategy for Norway's Culture and Sports Cooperation

    Evaluation Department Evaluation of the Strategy for Norway’s Culture and Sports Cooperation with Countries in the South Report 3/2011 – Evaluation Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation P.O.Box 8034 Dep, NO-0030 Oslo Ruseløkkveien 26, Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 22 24 20 30 Fax: +47 22 24 20 31 Photo: “Skulptur I” by Hans-Jörgen Johanssen Design: Agendum See Design Print: 07 Xpress AS, Oslo ISBN: 978-82-7548-587-6 Evaluation of the Strategy for Norway’s Culture and Sports Cooperation with Countries in the South July 2011 Nordic Consulting Group Core team: Kim Forss (team leader), Nora Ingdal, Stein-Erik Kruse, Ananda S. Millard “Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rest with the evaluation team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with those of Norad”. Preface The Strategy for Norway’s culture and sports co-operation with countries in the South covers the period 2006-2015, and it is stated in the Strategy that it “will be evaluated and, if necessary, modified in 2010”. The evaluation started in December 2010. It is the second evaluation commis- sioned by the Evaluation Department that specifically covers Norwegian support in the cultural sector. The first one was the Evaluation of Norwegian Support to the Protection of Cultural Heritage, that was carried out in 2008 and 2009. Internationally, there seems to be a lack of independent comprehensive evaluations in culture and sports, in particular the latter. The present evaluation thus deals with an area that has not as yet been covered comprehensively with great frequency, even if there are a larger number of program and project evaluations – more in cul- ture than in sports.
  • Minutes of Commemoration Event of International Anti-Corruption Day (IACD) December 9, 2019

    Minutes of Commemoration Event of International Anti-Corruption Day (IACD) December 9, 2019

    جمهورية الصومال الفدرالية Jamhuuriyadda Federaalka Soomaaliya Wasaaradda Caddaaladda وزارة العدل Federal Republic of Somalia Ministry of Justice Minutes of Commemoration Event of International Anti-Corruption Day (IACD) December 9, 2019 Through Resolution 58/4 of October 31, 2003, the UN General Assembly designated December 9 as an International Anti-Corruption Day (IACD) to raise people’s awareness of corruption and governments to renew political commitment to the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) in combating and preventing it. The assembly urged all states and competent regional economic integration organizations to sign and ratify it to ensure its rapid effort toward curbing corruption. UNCAC is the first legally binding, international anti-corruption instrument that provides a chance to mount a global response to corruption. On 9 December 2019, National Integrity Coordination Unit under Ministry of Justice & Judiciary Affairs convened a commemoration event of the 16th global anniversary of International Anti- Corruption Day (IACD) at Aden Abdulle International Airport (AAIA Hanger, Mogadishu) with the national and international stakeholders to renew the commitments of the society to improve integrity, accountability, and transparency. This event highlighted the achievements by the Integrity Coordination Unit, Ministry of Justice over the past year and the strengthening anti-corruption efforts across Somalia at Federal and Federal Member State level and the establishment strong network with civil society, private sector as well as international community to lay the foundations for a long-term approach in Somalia to fight corruption. Somalia has made significant progress over the past few years in putting together the building blocks for a comprehensive National Integrity System, with the passing of several laws and the establishment of the required institutions.
  • Organisational Review of Stromme Foundation

    Organisational Review of Stromme Foundation

    Norad Report 14/2008 Review Organisational Review of Strømme Foundation Final report Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation P.O. Box 8034 Dep, NO-0030 OSLO Ruseløkkveien 26, Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 22 24 20 30 Fax: +47 22 24 20 31 ISBN 978-82-7548-292-9 ISSN 1502-2528 Organisational Review of Strømme Foundation Final report 12 March 2008 Titus Tenga, LINS Roy Mersland, Nordic Consulting Group Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rests with the study team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with those of Norad. Executive summary This report is a regular Norad organisational review of the development partner Strømme Foundation (SF). SF is a Norwegian foundation based on Christian values, with a mission to eradicate poverty. SF has a framework agreement with Norad, which was signed in 2003. The organisation will be assessed for a renewed framework agreement after the fiscal year 2008. The total annual income in 2007 was around 126 million NOK, out of which around 36 million was funded by Norad. The reason for carrying out a review now is to establish a platform for further dialogue before assessing a renewed framework agreement from 2009 onward. Another objective is to present constructive recommendations for SF’s developmental efforts. Recently a new general secretary is heading SF, replacing the former who served the organisation for more than 14 years. This shift naturally puts the organisation in a transition position. This review process thus comes timely. Microfinance and education are the main areas in SF.
  • Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum

    Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum

    SOCIALIST LEFT PARTY NORWAY POLITICIANS INGE RYAN ERIK SOLHEIM KRISTIN HALVORSEN TORILD SKARD HANNA KVANMO JON HIPPE HANS OLAV LAHLUM PDF-33SLPNPIRESKHTSHKJHHOL0 | Page: 136 File Size 6,045 KB | 13 Jan, 2020 PDF File: Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard 1/3 Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum - PDF-33SLPNPIRESKHTSHKJHHOL0 TABLE OF CONTENT Introduction Brief Description Main Topic Technical Note Appendix Glossary PDF File: Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard 2/3 Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum - PDF-33SLPNPIRESKHTSHKJHHOL0 Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum e-Book Name : Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum - Read Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum PDF on your Android, iPhone, iPad or PC directly, the following PDF file is submitted in 13 Jan, 2020, Ebook ID PDF-33SLPNPIRESKHTSHKJHHOL0. Download full version PDF for Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum using the link below: Download: SOCIALIST LEFT PARTY NORWAY POLITICIANS INGE RYAN ERIK SOLHEIM KRISTIN HALVORSEN TORILD SKARD HANNA KVANMO JON HIPPE HANS OLAV LAHLUM PDF The writers of Socialist Left Party Norway Politicians Inge Ryan Erik Solheim Kristin Halvorsen Torild Skard Hanna Kvanmo Jon Hippe Hans Olav Lahlum have made all reasonable attempts to offer latest and precise information and facts for the readers of this publication.
  • Serious Fraud Office Investigations Regarding the Extractive Industry

    Serious Fraud Office Investigations Regarding the Extractive Industry

    SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE INVESTIGATIONS REGARDING THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY 24 March 2017 | London Legal Briefings – By Daniel Hudson and David Knott The mining industry presents a high risk of corruption as operations are often located in high risk regions and it is often necessary to interact with government officials and agencies in order to obtain licenses and approvals for the exploration, development, construction and operation of a mine. These factors, when combined with the general increase in enforcement of anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, primarily by the United States and United Kingdom authorities, which has led to more investigations and prosecutions, higher monetary sanctions, and the imposition of monitors and other agents to oversee businesses, means that it critical that mining operators ensure that they have in place adequate procedures to prevent bribery from taking place. In this article we set out a brief recap on the key features of the UK Bribery Act 2010 and provide examples of recent and ongoing bribery investigations by the UK authorities regarding mining companies and other companies within the extractive industries. There are a number of ongoing overseas investigations which are outside the scope of the article but which demonstrate the high levels of activity by enforcement bodies around the world regarding the mining industry (e.g. the cross-border investigation into BSG Resources Limited, which has seen charges brought in the US against Guinea's former minister of mines and the arrest and subsequent release without charge of Beny Steinmetz). Overview of UK Bribery Act 2010 The UK's Bribery Act 2010 came into force in 2011 and updates the criminalisation of both public and private sector bribery.
  • 2016 the Legacy Center for Peace and Transparecy

    2016 the Legacy Center for Peace and Transparecy

    ~For Transparency, a Leap Forward, a Better Future ~ Overview of Corruption, Underlying Causes, and its Impacts in Somalia! 2016 Transparecy and Peace for "To stabilize Somalia,Center efforts to combat corruption must be robust, effective, and thorough. But above all, these efforts must be independent." Legacy The A mother runs with her child after a suicide bomber attack on April14, 2013 in Mogadishu (AFP Photo / Mohamed Abdiwahab) Compiled by the Legacy Center for Peace and Transparency (LCPT) Transparecy @ 2016 Legacy Center for Peace and Transparency All Rights Reserved. and No part of this publication may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmit-ted in any form, by any means; mechanical, via photocopying, recording or other-wise-without prior permission from the Legacy Center for Peace and Transparency. LCPT is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit research organization dedicated to fighting corruption, building peace, and democratic societyPeace in Somalia. Our aim is to conduct high- quality and independent research, to provide innovative practical recommendations that advance three broad goals: 1) Transparency and Accountability for 2) Peace and Equality 3) Democratic and Prosperous Somalia The LCPT conducts extensive research across Somalia, using quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. In addition to household surveys using mobile phones and Interviews with key community figures and other stakeholders, LCPT also analyses publicly available data to complete its secondary research. Center To learn
  • Case Å Ta for Seg Med Dette Som Utgangspunkt

    Case Å Ta for Seg Med Dette Som Utgangspunkt

    Kontroversen oljesand En retorisk analyse av posisjonering i selvpubliserte tekster Tarjei Garsjø 30. april 2013 Forord Aller første vil jeg si at dette har vært et særdeles interessant prosjekt å arbeide med - det har gitt meg en rekke nyttige erfaringer, og jeg har lært enormt mye. Kanskje viktigst av alt har det gitt meg et skarpere analytisk blikk som har blitt en varig del av meg. Gjennom dette arbeidet har jeg fått hjelp av flere både rause og dyktige personer. Først og fremst vil jeg rette en stor takk til Gunhild Åm Vatn, min veileder gjennom hele perioden. Du har vært en god støttespiller fra start til slutt i denne prosessen. Dine faglige innspill har vært uvurderlige, og du har utvist tålmodighet når jeg har trengt det som mest. En takk rettes også til Dagfinn og Simon for deres interesse, selv om jeg ikke alltid fikk holdt dere like oppdatert. Ikke minst vil jeg takke mamma og pappa, for å ha mast hverken for mye eller for lite. Dette er en balansegang dere kan. Takk også for verdifulle innspill om de tekniske delene av oppgaven. 1 2 Innhold 1 Introduksjon 1.1 Utgangspunkt 7 1.2 Endelig problemstilling 7 1.3 Oppgavens oppbygning, fokus og formål 8 2 Bakgrunnsinformasjon og forløp 11 2.1 Statoil 11 2.2 Oljesand, hva er det? 11 2.3 Framtiden i våre hender 12 2.4 Sakens kjerne 13 3 Teoretisk forankring 15 3.1 Klassisk retorikk 15 3.2 Moderne retorikk 17 3.2.1 Troper 18 3.2.2 Metafor 18 3.2.3 Metonym 19 3.2.4 Ulike holdniger, ulik retorikk 20 3.3 Roller og face 21 3.3.1 Hvilket selv vil Statoil presentere? 21 3.4 Posisjonering
  • Africanreview of 4 Pnl.T.Politicaly Economy

    Africanreview of 4 Pnl.T.Politicaly Economy

    AfricanREVIEW OF 4 Pnl.t.PoliticalY Economy EDITORS: The Review of African Political Economy Chris Allen and Jan Burgess (ROAPE) is published quarterly by Carfax Publishing Company for the ROAPE BOOK REVIEWS: international editorial collective. Now 24 Ray Bush, Roy Love and Morris Szeftel years old, ROAPE is a fully refereed journal covering all aspects of African political EDITORIAL WORKING GROUP: economy. ROAPE has always involved the Chris Allen, Carolyn Baylies, Lyn Brydon, readership in shaping the journal's coverage, Janet Bujra, Jan Burgess, Ray Bush, Carolyne welcoming contributions from grass roots Dennis, Anita Franklin, Jon Knox, Roy Love, organisations, women's organisations, trade Giles Mohan, Colin Murray, Mike Powell, unions and political groups. The journal is Stephen Riley, David Seddon, David Simon, unique in the comprehensiveness of its Colin Stoneman, Morris Szeftel, Tina bibliographic referencing, information Wallace, Gavin Williams, A. B. Zack- monitoring, statistical documentation and Williams coverage of work-in-progress. CONTRIBUTING EDITORS: Editorial correspondence, including Africa: Rok Ajulu (Grahamstown), manuscripts for submission, should be sent Yusuf Bangura (Zaria), Billy Cobbett to Jan Burgess, ROAPE Publications Ltd, (Johannesburg), Antonieta Coelho (Luanda), PO Box 678, Sheffield S1 1BF, UK. Bill Freund (Durban), Jibril Ibrahim (Zaria), Tel: 44 +(0)1226 +741660; Fax 44 +(0) 1226 Amadina Lihamba (Dar es Salaam), +741661; E-mail: [email protected]. Mahmood Mamdani (Cape Town), Trevor Parfitt (Cairo), Lloyd Sachikonye (Harare), Business correspondence, including orders Carol Thompson (Arizona); Canada: and remittances relating to subscriptions, Jonathan Barker (Toronto), Bonnie Campbell advertisements, back numbers and offprints, (Montreal), Dickson Eyoh (Toronto), John should be addressed to the publisher: Carfax Loxley (Winnipeg), John Saul (Toronto); Publishing Ltd, PO Box 25, Abingdon, Europe: Björn Beckman (Stockholm), M.
  • Dadaab Returnee Conflict Assessment August 2017

    Dadaab Returnee Conflict Assessment August 2017

    DADAAB RETURNEE CONFLICT ASSESSMENT AUGUST 2017 PREPARED FOR DANISH DEMINING GROUP (DDG) BY KEN MENKHAUS Dadaab Returnee Conflict Assessment | i Foreword and Acknowledgements This conflict assessment was implemented as part of the UK Department for International Development (DFID) funded and Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) and Danish Refugee Council (DRC) implemented project: ‘Promoting Durable Solutions through Integrated Return, Reintegration and Resilience Support to Somali Displacement affected Populations’. The project aims to support conditions conducive for safe and dignified return and sustainable reintegration of Somali refugees. The project was implemented between October 2016 and June 2017. The Conflict Assessment was implemented by the Danish Demining Group (DDG), under the supervision of Mads Frilander. The principal investigator and author of the study is Ken Menkhaus, and he alone is responsible for any errors or misinterpretations in the report. He and Ismahan Adawe formed the research team that conducted fieldwork for this study in Mogadishu, Kismayo, Baidoa, and Nairobi in December 2016 and January 2017. The analysis combines existing studies and reports collected in a literature review with over 60 field interviews, as well as a survey carried out in Kismayo. The interviews were semi-structured in format, some held with key informants and others with focus groups of men and women representing host communities, internally displaced persons (IDPs), and returnees. The survey was carried out by the company Researchcare Africa. The research was conducted in challenging security and political conditions, and the research team is deeply indebted to many individuals and organisations who provided essential help to overcome those obstacles. We are also very grateful to the hundreds of Somali stakeholders and international aid officials who volunteered their time to meet with the research team and discuss these issues.
  • Assessing the Financial Accountability of the Somali Federal Government Organizations

    Assessing the Financial Accountability of the Somali Federal Government Organizations

    Public Policy and Administration Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5731(Paper) ISSN 2225-0972(Online) Vol.4, No.2, 2014 Assessing the Financial Accountability of the Somali Federal Government Organizations Abdirisaq Ibrahim Mohamed Faculty of Business and Accountancy, SIMAD University Tel: 252-61-5539547, E-mail: [email protected] Ali Yassin Sheikh-Ali (Corresponding author) Department of Public Administration, SIMAD University Tel: 252-61-2225577, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Building robust financial accountability system is an essential step in making the Federal government of Somalia (FGS) a more effective institution that is able to deliver basic public services to the people of Somalia. The purpose of this study is to assess the financial accountability in the FGS. The study collected data from six federal institutions employing questionnaires. Seventy civil servants participated in the study. The Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics of mean and standard deviation. The study found that the system of financial accountability in the FGS is improving. The study recommends to the FGS to upgrade internal controls and financial reporting systems, publish significant budget information in a regular and timely manner to the public; promote public participation in the budget process and strength the auditor general to carry out its functions effectively. Keywords: Accountability, Financial matters, Federal government, Somalia 1. Introduction Accountability is a broad term that reflects a range of understandings rather than a single paradigm. There are indeed many different approaches and definitions of accountability but this study adopts the definition of Curtin & Nollkaemper, (2005). They referred accountability as a process in which an actor explains conduct and gives information to others, in which a judgement or assessment of that conduct is rendered on the basis of prior established rules or principles and in which it may be possible for some form of sanction to be imposed on the actor .
  • The American University in Cairo

    The American University in Cairo

    THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE THE NEXUS BETWEEN DOMESTIC INTERESTS AND FOREIGN AID POLICY: THE CASE OF THE NORWEGIAN AID AGENDA BENEDICTE BAKKESKAU A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE JUNE 2011 THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO THE NEXUS BETWEEN DOMESTIC INTERESTS AND FOREIGN AID POLICY: THE CASE OF THE NORWEGIAN AID AGENDA A THESIS SUBMITTED BY BENEDICTE BAKKESKAU TO THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE JUNE 2011 IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS HAS BEEN APPROVED BY Dr. Ezzedine Choukri Fishere Thesis Committee Advisor-------------------------------------------------------------------- Affiliation: Department of Political Science, American University in Cairo Dr. Ibrahim Elnur Thesis Committee Reader -------------------------------------------------------------------- Affiliation: Department of Political Science, American University in Cairo Dr. Pandeli Glavanis Thesis Committee Reader -------------------------------------------------------------------- Affiliation: Center for Learning and Teaching, American University in Cairo ----------------- -------------- -------------------- -------------- Department Chair Date Dean of HUSS Date For my mother, Bente Bakkeskau, to whom I owe so much. Thank you for instilling in me patience, determination and strength. Thank you for making me more than I can be. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this thesis I have drawn on the support of many people without whom the final result would not have been the same. First, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Ezzedine Choukri Fishere, for his suggestions and guidance in this process. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Ibrahim Elnur and Dr. Pandeli Glavanis, for agreeing to be a part of this endeavor and for the constructive criticism and advice they offered.