DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix J – Details of Council Tax Charges for the District

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix J – Details of Council Tax Charges for the District Appendix J – Details of Council Tax Charges for the District Gloucestershire County Council set its budget on 17 February 2021 and has issued a precept on this Council for 2021/22 of £64,223,244, which equates to a Band D rate of £1,409.22. This is an increase of 4.75% on the 2020/21 Band D rate, consisting of a 2.76% Adult Social Care levy and 1.99% council tax increase. The Police and Crime Commissioner for Gloucestershire set its budget on 8 February 2021 and has issued a precept on this Council for 2021/22 of £12,308,502, which equates to a Band D rate of £270.08. This is an increase of 4.99% on the Band D rate for 2020/21. Stroud District Council’s precept on the Collection Fund for 2021/22 is £9,913,163, which equates to a Band D rate of £217.52. This is an increase or 2.35% from the 2020/21 Band D rate. The parish and town councils have issued precepts for 2021/22 totalling £4,380,120 including special expenses, which equates to an average Band D of £96.11. This represents an increase of 1.91% on the average 2020/21 Band D of £94.31. Further details of Council Tax charges are shown in the text and tables below. 1. It should be noted that the Council has calculated: (a) the Council Tax Base 2021/22 for the whole Council area as 45,573.57 [Item T in the formula in Section 31B(3) of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, as amended (the “Act”)] and, (b) for dwellings in those parts of its area to which a Parish precept relates as in the attached Appendix B column 2. 2. Calculate that the Council Tax requirement for the for the Council’s own purposes for 2021/22 (excluding Parish precepts) is £9,913,163. 3. That the following amounts be calculated for the year 2021/22 in accordance with Sections 30 to 36 of the Act: (a) £104,222,620 being the aggregate of the amounts which the Council estimates for the items set out in Section 31A(2) (a) to (f) of the Act taking into account all precepts issued to it by Parish Councils. (b) £89,929,500 being the aggregate of the amounts which the Council estimates for the items set out in Section 31A(3) (a) to (d) of the Act. (c) £14,293,283 being the amount by which the aggregate at 3(a) above exceeds the aggregate at 3(b) above, calculated by the Council in accordance with Section 31A(4) of the Act as its Council Tax requirement for the year. (Item R in the formula in Section 31B of the Act). (d) £313.63 being the amount at 3(c) above (Item R), all divided by Item T (1(a)) above, calculated by the Council, in accordance with Section 31B of the Act, as the basic amount of its Council Tax for the year (Basic Band ‘D’ including Parish precepts). (e) £4,380,120 being the aggregate amount of all special items (Parish precepts) referred to in Section 34(1) of the Act (as per Table 1). (f) £217.52 being the amount at 3(d) above less the result given by dividing the amount at 3(e) above by Item T (1 (a) above), calculated by the Council, in accordance with Section 34(2) of the Act, as the basic amount of its Council Tax for the year for dwellings in those parts of its area to which no Parish precept relates. (Basic Band ‘D’ excluding Parish/Town Councils). 4. That it be noted that for the year 2021/22 Gloucestershire County Council and The Police and Crime Commissioner for Gloucestershire have stated the following amounts in precepts issued to the Council in accordance with Section 40 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 for each of the categories of dwellings shown below: Gloucestershire County Council Office of the Police and Crime Valuation (£) Commissioner for Gloucestershire Bands ASC General Total (£) DisrA** 86.51 696.39 782.90 150.04 A 103.81 835.67 939.48 180.05 B 121.12 974.94 1,096.06 210.06 C 138.42 1,114.22 1,252.64 240.07 D 155.72 1,253.50 1,409.22 270.08 E 190.32 1,532.06 1,722.38 330.10 F 224.93 1,810.61 2,035.54 390.12 G 259.53 2,089.17 2,348.70 450.13 H 311.44 2,507.00 2,818.44 540.16 *Band DisrA provides for a discount for disabled people living in a band A property 5. That, having calculated the aggregate in each case of the amounts at 3(d) and 4 above, the Council in accordance with Section 30 and 36 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, hereby sets the amounts of Council Tax for the year 2021/22 for each of the categories of dwellings shown in Table 4. 6. The Council has determined that its relevant basic amount of Council Tax for 2021/22 is not excessive in accordance with principles approved under Section 52ZB Local Government Finance Act 1992. As the billing authority, the Council has not been notified by a major precepting authority that its relevant basic amount of Council Tax for 2021/22 is excessive and that the billing authority is not required to hold a referendum in accordance with Section 52ZK Local Government Finance Act 1992. Table 1: Calculation of Council Tax Rate – 2021/22 Parish Tax Parish District Total Band Area Name Precept (£) Base Band D (£) Band D (£) D (£) Alderley 0 45.82 0.00 217.52 217.52 Alkington 8,500 313.40 27.12 217.52 244.64 Arlingham 3,662 223.48 16.39 217.52 233.91 Berkeley 126,535 794.83 159.20 217.52 376.72 Bisley-with-Lypiatt 67,928 1,072.68 63.33 217.52 280.85 Brimscombe and Thrupp 49,250 717.54 68.64 217.52 286.16 Brookthorpe-with-Whaddon 17,350 156.65 110.76 217.52 328.28 Cainscross 255,000 2,107.93 120.97 217.52 338.49 Cam 276,270 3,141.25 87.95 217.52 305.47 Chalford 171,015 2,449.09 69.83 217.52 287.35 Coaley 13,200 366.60 36.01 217.52 253.53 Cranham 8,775 243.05 36.10 217.52 253.62 Dursley 500,300 2,414.38 207.22 217.52 424.74 Eastington 97,080 964.77 100.63 217.52 318.15 Elmore 2,472 92.25 26.80 217.52 244.32 Frampton-on-Severn 18,000 544.34 33.07 217.52 250.59 Fretherne-with-Saul 32,500 282.47 115.06 217.52 332.58 Frocester 1,100 72.32 15.21 217.52 232.73 Ham and Stone 9,765 354.57 27.54 217.52 245.06 Hamfallow 18,475 396.27 46.62 217.52 264.14 Hardwicke 52,650 1,477.73 35.63 217.52 253.15 Harescombe 5,080 101.50 50.05 217.52 267.57 Haresfield 9,551 157.97 60.46 217.52 277.98 Hillesley & Tresham 4,420 293.24 15.07 217.52 232.59 Hinton 38,672 415.30 93.12 217.52 310.64 Horsley 32,130 357.56 89.86 217.52 307.38 Hunts Grove 24,160 821.22 29.42 217.52 246.94 Kings Stanley 28,990 985.32 29.42 217.52 246.94 Kingswood 109,063 577.16 188.96 217.52 406.48 Leonard Stanley 35,402 673.95 52.53 217.52 270.05 Longney & Epney 3,950 140.67 28.08 217.52 245.60 Minchinhampton 110,000 2,567.99 42.84 217.52 260.36 Miserden 10,200 196.74 51.85 217.52 269.37 Moreton Valence 7,000 78.90 88.72 217.52 306.24 Nailsworth 350,726 2,149.51 163.17 217.52 380.69 North Nibley 18,400 395.79 46.49 217.52 264.01 Nympsfield 10,000 167.08 59.85 217.52 277.37 Owlpen 0 21.26 0.00 217.52 217.52 Painswick 109,700 1,800.73 60.92 217.52 278.44 Pitchcombe 3,250 140.89 23.07 217.52 240.59 Randwick & Westrip 18,791 555.61 33.82 217.52 251.34 Rodborough 101,311 1,989.37 50.93 217.52 268.45 Slimbridge 62,065 479.21 129.52 217.52 347.04 Standish 13,154 197.53 66.59 217.52 284.11 Stinchcombe 5,550 214.84 25.83 217.52 243.35 Stonehouse 336,995 2,365.54 142.46 217.52 359.98 Stroud 744,829 4,292.91 173.50 217.52 391.02 Uley 18,710 525.64 35.59 217.52 253.11 Upton St Leonards 39,939 1,201.21 33.25 217.52 250.77 Whiteshill & Ruscombe 39,350 467.72 84.13 217.52 301.65 Whitminster 17,775 364.43 48.77 217.52 266.29 Woodchester 12,700 558.60 22.74 217.52 240.26 Wotton-under-Edge 328,027 2,086.76 157.19 217.52 374.71 Total parishes 4,379,717 45,573.57 Special Expenses Ham & Stone Burial Area 403.04 98.38 4.10 Total including special expense 4,380,120 Table 2: Parish Council Tax charges for all parts of the Stroud District by band – 2021/22 Disr A* Band A Band B Band C Band D Band E Band F Band G Band H Part of the Council's area (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) (£) Alderley 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Alkington 15.07 18.08 21.09 24.11 27.12 33.15 39.18 45.20 54.24 Arlingham 9.10 10.92 12.74 14.57 16.39 20.03 23.67 27.31 32.77 Berkeley 88.44 106.13 123.82 141.51 159.20 194.57 229.95 265.33 318.40 Bisley-with-Lypiatt 35.18 42.22 49.25 56.29 63.33 77.40 91.47 105.54 126.65 Brimscombe & Thrupp 38.13 45.76 53.38 61.01 68.64 83.89 99.14 114.40 137.27 Brookthorpe-with-Whaddon 61.53 73.84 86.14 98.45 110.76 135.37 159.98 184.59 221.51 Cainscross 67.21 80.65 94.09 107.53 120.97 147.85 174.74 201.62 241.94 Cam 48.86 58.63 68.40 78.18 87.95 107.49 127.04 146.58 175.90 Chalford 38.79 46.55 54.31 62.07 69.83 85.35 100.86 116.38 139.66 Coaley 20.00 24.00 28.01 32.01 36.01 44.01 52.01 60.01 72.01 Cranham 20.06 24.07 28.08 32.09 36.10 44.13 52.15 60.17 72.21 Dursley 115.12 138.15 161.17 184.20 207.22 253.27 299.32 345.37 414.44 Eastington 55.90 67.08 78.26 89.45 100.63 122.99 145.35 167.71 201.25 Elmore 14.89 17.86 20.84 23.82 26.80 32.75 38.71 44.66 53.59 Frampton-on-Severn 18.37 22.05 25.72 29.39 33.07 40.42 47.76 55.11 66.14 Fretherne-with-Saul 63.92 76.70 89.49 102.27 115.06 140.62 166.19 191.76 230.11 Frocester 8.45 10.14 11.83 13.52 15.21 18.59 21.97 25.35 30.42 Ham & Stone 15.30 18.36 21.42 24.48 27.54 33.66 39.78 45.90 55.08 Hamfallow 25.90 31.08 36.26 41.44 46.62 56.98 67.34 77.70 93.24 Hardwicke 19.79 23.75 27.71 31.67 35.63 43.55 51.46 59.38 71.26 Harescombe 27.81 33.37 38.93 44.49 50.05 61.17 72.29 83.42 100.10 Haresfield 33.59 40.31 47.03 53.74 60.46 73.90 87.33 100.77 120.92 Hillesley & Tresham 8.37 10.05 11.72 13.40 15.07 18.42 21.77 25.12 30.15 Hinton 51.73 62.08 72.43 82.77 93.12 113.81 134.50 155.20 186.24 Horsley 49.92 59.91 69.89 79.87 89.86 109.83 129.80 149.77 179.72 Hunts Grove 16.34 19.61 22.88 26.15 29.42 35.96 42.50 49.03 58.84 Kings Stanley 16.35
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miserden-Estate
    CASE STUDY 6 Miserden Estate, Miserden The estate is managed in a traditional manner with a strong emphasis on the environment and wider community. The Upper River Frome fl ows through the length of the estate with numerous springs, dry valleys and historical impoundments. Location: Miserden Estate, Miserden Water course: The River Frome Sub-catchment: Upper River Frome, Stroud Frome Ownership The Miserden Estate has been owned by the Wills family since 1913. Access There is good public and permissive footpath and bridleway access on the estate and the structures can be seen in various locations. About the project How it was achieved The structures were built primarily using ash, hazel coppice and Fifty large woody debris (LWD) leaky dams and in-stream a small amount of alder sourced from the estate woodlands. timber defl ectors were installed in the Upper River Frome Fifteen of these structures are small and designed to defl ect and one of its main tributaries. The aim of the work was to fl ows within the channel and improve in-stream habitat. provide a physical barrier for high fl ows. The leaky dams were Thirty-fi ve were designed primarily to reduce high fl ows and constructed from tree trunks and branches to provide a partial defl ect fl ows onto the fl oodplain. All of the structures are blockage of the stream. This creates a series of small pools to pinned in place using 1.2m reinforcing steel bars to attach the reduce fl ood fl ows and to slow down the rate at which fl ood tree trunks together and into the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Stroud Labour Party
    Gloucestershire County Council single member ward review Response from Stroud Constituency Labour Party Introduction On 30 November the Local Government Boundary Commission started its second period of consultation for a pattern of divisions for Gloucestershire. Between 30 November and 21 February the Commission is inviting comments on the division boundaries for GCC. Following the completion of its initial consultation, the Commission has proposed that the number of county councillors should be reduced from 63 to 53. The districts have provided the estimated numbers for the electorate in their areas in 2016; the total number for the county is 490,674 so that the average electorate per councillor would be 9258 (cf. 7431 in 2010). The main purpose of this note is to draw attention to the constraints imposed on proposals for a new pattern of divisions in Stroud district, which could lead to anomalies, particularly in ‘bolting together’ dissimilar district wards and parishes in order to meet purely numerical constraints. In it own words ‘the Commission aims to recommend a pattern of divisions that achieves good electoral equality, reflects community identities and interests and provides for effective and convenient local government. It will also seek to use strong, easily-identifiable boundaries. ‘Proposals should demonstrate how any pattern of divisions aids the provision of effective and convenient local government and why any deterioration in equality of representation or community identity should be accepted. Representations that are supported by evidence and argument will carry more weight with the Commission than those which merely assert a point of view.’ While a new pattern of ten county council divisions is suggested in this note, it is not regarded as definitive but does contain ways of avoiding some possible major anomalies.
    [Show full text]
  • Upton St Leonards Life Incorporating Church News
    Upton St Leonards Life incorporating Church News Issue 4 December 2014 This wonderful picture of a snowy day in Upton was painted by local artist and villager Sue Gage. It won the 2014 President’s Cup at the Gloucestershire Society of Artists. Congratulations Sue! (Picture reproduced with permission) your hand at a couple of fiendish prize …is a packed one! A lot of news and puzzles! reports and details of the many events Do have a really good look at the diary, coming up. Upton School kids have the BMI ad on the back page and the created their own kids’ page. Try out Church pages to see the large number a novel Christmas Cake, make this of events you can join in to mark this beautiful Christmas wreath, or try special season. 1 (the 5th November) What a great evening it was at the annual Village Hall bonfire The food was provided, as always, by the Portway Farm Shop and and firework display! Everything was as we wished for we know how popular their sausages and burgers are. We always including perfect weather conditions, a cloudless sky and no have very favourable comments about them. wind. Chipmunks Nursery made and donated the guy. There Village Hall Bonfire Night Winners: was a deluge; not rain, just people. They kept on coming. The Treasure Hunt - Elizabeth Quant folks on the gate were under great pressure and those working Sweets in the jar - Bridie McCann in the kitchen serving the food were exhausted at the end, Teddy Bear’s name - Millie Warner having sold everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Police and Crime Commissioner Election Number of Seats Division
    Election of Police and Crime Commission for PCC Local Area Police and Crime Commissioner Election Number of Seats Gloucestershire Police Area 1 Election of County Councillors to Gloucestershire County Council Division Number of Division Number of Seats Seats Bisley & Painswick 1 Nailsworth 1 Cam Valley 1 Rodborough 1 Dursley 1 Stroud Central 1 Hardwicke & Severn 1 Stonehouse 1 Minchinhampton 1 Wotton-under-Edge 1 TOTAL 10 Election of District Councillors to Stroud District Council District Council Number of District Council Election Seats Election Amberley & Woodchester 1 Randwick, Whiteshill & 1 Ruscombe Berkeley Vale 3 Rodborough 2 Bisley 1 Severn 2 Cainscross 3 Stonehouse 3 Cam East 2 Stroud Central 1 Cam West 2 Stroud Farmhill & Paganhill 1 Chalford 3 Stroud Slade 1 Coaley & Uley 1 Stroud Trinity 1 Dursley 3 Stroud Uplands 1 Hardwicke 3 Stroud Valley 1 Kingswood 1 The Stanley 2 Minchinhampton 2 Thrupp 1 Nailsworth 3 Wotton-under-Edge 3 Painswick & Upton 3 TOTAL 51 Election of Parish/Town Councillors to [name of Parish/Town] Council. Parish/Town Number of Parish/Town Number of Council/Ward Seats Council/Ward seats Minchinhampton (Amberley Alkington 7 Ward) 2 Minchinhampton (Box Arlingham 7 Ward) 1 Minchinhampton Berkeley 9 (Brimscombe Ward) 3 Minchinhampton (North Bisley (Bisley Ward) 4 Ward) 6 Minchinhampton (South Bisley (Eastcombe Ward) 4 Ward) 3 Bisley (Oakridge Ward) 4 Miserden 5 Brookthorpe-with-Whaddon 6 Moreton Valence 5 Cainscross (Cainscross Ward) 2 Nailsworth 11 Cainscross (Cashes Green East Ward) 3 North Nibley 7 Cainscross
    [Show full text]
  • Beacon Directory 2018
    Directory 2018 published by The Painswick Beacon sections about 400 entries ACCOMMODATION BANKING index BUILDING and DECORATING BUSINESSES and SHOPS on pages CAMPING and CARAVANS 32 - 34 CHARITIES CHURCHES and CHURCH ORGANISATIONS CLUBS and SOCIETlES including sport addresses EDUCATION and EMERGENCIES and UTILITIES telephone ENTERTAINMENT numbers ESTATE AGENTS are for FARMERS, BREEDERS and LANDHOLDERS Painswick INFORMATION SERVICES and KENNELS 01452 LIBRARY SERVICES unless stated MEDICAL, HEALTH and THERAPY SERVICES MEETING HALLS PUBLIC TRANSPORT RESTAURANTS and PUBS STATUTORY AUTHORITIES and REPRESENTATIVES TAXIS and CHAUFFEUR SERVICES maps PAINSWICK VILLAGE and CENTRAL AREA This Directory is available on-line at www.painswickbeacon.org.uk Contact points for the Beacon are: • Berry Cottage, Paradise, Painswick, GL6 6TN • The Beacon post box, adjacent to the public telephone in New Street • E-mail to [email protected] * Directory entries: email to [email protected] or hard copy in the Beacon post box 2 ACCOMMODATION Court House Manor ACCOMMODATION Hale Lane GL6 6QE 814849 Luxury B&B, exclusive house hire and Falcon Inn weddings,13 rooms, private car park New Street GL6 6UN info&courthousemanor.co.uk 814222 www.courthousemanor.co.uk Restaurant, bars, function room for hire. 11 en-suite bedrooms. Damsells Lodge Large car park. Open all year. The Park, Painswick GL6 6SR [email protected] 813777 www.falconpainswick.co.uk B&B 1do. 1fam. 1tw. all en suite The Painswick Washwell Farm Kemps Lane GL6 6YB Cheltenham Road GL6 6SJ 813688 813067 or 07866916242 16 bedrooms, 2 spa treatment rooms, B&B 1do. en suite restaurant, private dining room. On-site car park.
    [Show full text]
  • City Plan Part 1
    Appendix 2 – Response Report Please note: Respondent’s comments have been added verbatim Comment Received to Question 1: Do you agree with the general strategy identified for dealing the key Key points and Officer challenges? If no…. Response Generally yes, but whilst there is a general recognition that the City will need to accommodate growth on its periphery the Noted. These are important references to that growth being best directed to the north of the city ignore the fact that the city will continue to grow issues and Gloucester city will south of the city with the build out of the already consented Hunts Grove development. In the proposed Stroud Local continue its duty to cooperate with Plan an extension of this area is proposed to accommodate between 500-750 houses and associated infrastructure, Stroud with regard to cross services and community facilities. The relationship of Gloucester with Stroud is not addressed in the City plan. It is a fact boundary growth issues. The City that Gloucester's influence stretches beyond its city boundaries, attracting workers, shoppers, students and visitors from Plan does need to be read Stroud district. The Hunts Grove proposals present the opportunity to effectively complete this development and improve alongside the JCS in this regard the infrastructure and service provision to the south of the city within a planned urban extension at a well contained and as the JCS in particular sustainable location as supported by the Council's evidence base. The City Council should co-operate with Stroud addresses these cross boundary District continuing to work together to resist major expansion south of the city in less sustainable locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending at Pubs! Covering Caudle Green, Edgeworth, Sapperton, the Daneway, Duntisbourne
    2012016666 A series of short, circular walks around Cotswold villages – ending at pubs! Covering Caudle Green, Edgeworth, Sapperton, The Daneway, Duntisbourne You can also download other booklets in the series from www.rrgordon.com including 1. Birdlip & Beyond, 2. Painswick Valley, 3. Toadsmoor Valley, 5. The Falcon Painswick, 6. Stroud & Surrounds Over 10,000 booklets printed Little Cotswold Walks Book 44.. Frome Valley Edition 02 Copyright © 2016 by RR Gordon RR Gordon is the author of the best-selling Gull Rock No 1 on the Amazon Mystery Series bestseller list Garden design, landscaping and garden maintenance Every garden has a story; the landscaping its narrative, the plants its characters. A beautiful garden will be more; engaging, imaginative and developing over time. Each garden is different. Some need Contact details; building from scratch; some short term [email protected] solutions; others long term design and 01242539510 ongoing maintenance. Gardens by Keltie 07920147374 and Clark design their bespoke gardens www.keltieandclark.co.uk with this at the forefront. From the initial design, through the build, planting and ongoing aftercare, their focus is on the developing garden and its ongoing story. Introduction. When I put these walks together, I’m looking for a good part of the walk to go through the pathways and lanes of a village, but also for part to be through the countryside with a bit of up and down. I aim for an hour or so – which justifies having a pudding at the pub! This book, entitled Frome Valley , contains walks in Caudle Green, Edgeworth, Sapperton and The Daneway pub which are in the valley of the River Frome - as well as Duntisbourne Abbots which is in a valley running parallel to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents
    Helping older people in Gloucestershire feel more independent, secure, and have a better quality of life May 2014 Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents Managed by GRCC Jointly funded by Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group www.villageagents.org.uk Helping older people in Gloucestershire feel more independent, secure, and have a better quality of life Gloucestershire Village & Community Agents Managed by GRCC Jointly funded by Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Gloucestershire Village and Key objectives: To give older people easy Community Agents is aimed 3 access to a wide range of primarily at the over 50s but also To help older people in information that will enable them offers assistance to vulnerable 1 Gloucestershire feel more to make informed choices about people in the county. independent, secure, cared for, their present and future needs. and have a better quality of life. The agents provide information To engage older people to To promote local services and support to help people stay 4 enable them to influence and groups, enabling the independent, expand their social 2 future planning and provision. Agent to provide a client with a activities, gain access to a wide community-based solution To provide support to range of services and keep where appropriate. people over the age of 18 involved with their local 5 who are affected by cancer. communities. Partner agencies ² Gloucestershire County Council’s Adult Social Care Helpdesk ² Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group ² Gloucestershire Rural Community
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Parish Map
    Gloucestershire Parish Map MapKey NAME DISTRICT MapKey NAME DISTRICT MapKey NAME DISTRICT 1 Charlton Kings CP Cheltenham 91 Sevenhampton CP Cotswold 181 Frocester CP Stroud 2 Leckhampton CP Cheltenham 92 Sezincote CP Cotswold 182 Ham and Stone CP Stroud 3 Prestbury CP Cheltenham 93 Sherborne CP Cotswold 183 Hamfallow CP Stroud 4 Swindon CP Cheltenham 94 Shipton CP Cotswold 184 Hardwicke CP Stroud 5 Up Hatherley CP Cheltenham 95 Shipton Moyne CP Cotswold 185 Harescombe CP Stroud 6 Adlestrop CP Cotswold 96 Siddington CP Cotswold 186 Haresfield CP Stroud 7 Aldsworth CP Cotswold 97 Somerford Keynes CP Cotswold 187 Hillesley and Tresham CP Stroud 112 75 8 Ampney Crucis CP Cotswold 98 South Cerney CP Cotswold 188 Hinton CP Stroud 9 Ampney St. Mary CP Cotswold 99 Southrop CP Cotswold 189 Horsley CP Stroud 10 Ampney St. Peter CP Cotswold 100 Stow-on-the-Wold CP Cotswold 190 King's Stanley CP Stroud 13 11 Andoversford CP Cotswold 101 Swell CP Cotswold 191 Kingswood CP Stroud 12 Ashley CP Cotswold 102 Syde CP Cotswold 192 Leonard Stanley CP Stroud 13 Aston Subedge CP Cotswold 103 Temple Guiting CP Cotswold 193 Longney and Epney CP Stroud 89 111 53 14 Avening CP Cotswold 104 Tetbury CP Cotswold 194 Minchinhampton CP Stroud 116 15 Bagendon CP Cotswold 105 Tetbury Upton CP Cotswold 195 Miserden CP Stroud 16 Barnsley CP Cotswold 106 Todenham CP Cotswold 196 Moreton Valence CP Stroud 17 Barrington CP Cotswold 107 Turkdean CP Cotswold 197 Nailsworth CP Stroud 31 18 Batsford CP Cotswold 108 Upper Rissington CP Cotswold 198 North Nibley CP Stroud 19 Baunton
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Infrastructure Project (MIP) MIP Background
    Mobile Infrastructure Project (MIP) MIP Background Gloucestershire Economic Growth Scruny Commiee 9th September 2015 By Lionel Spencer MIP Stakeholder Lead 1 MIP - Overview • A publicly funded project to provide mobile phone coverage by all four Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) in areas that have none at present • ‘Not spots’: Areas with no effecCve coverage by any of the mobile network operators, usually because it is uneconomic to do so • Tackling market failure to provide mobile coverage to less populated areas • State Aid funding means MIP cannot consider areas where there is coverage from at least one (UK) operator, but not from others • State Aid funding is for improvements to “voice coverage and basic data”, but all sites will have the connecCvity to manage upgraded services • Operaonal & technical challenges – especially connecCng the new sites into the MNOs’ networks Those involved: • The Department of Culture Media and Sport (Broadband Delivery UK) is meeCng the capital cost of the project • Arqiva has been contracted to deliver it • Harlequin are Arqiva’s acquisiCon agents • The four Mobile Network Operators: • Have all agreed to provide a service from all MIP sites for 20 years • Have agreed to meet all the operang costs of doing so The Challenge: - All on the same site! Planning permission Economic power supply (i.e. Nearby) Viable transmission links (2) Not Spots Coverage of the Access for build and operaon Available site at Economic site rental Economic construcCon cost Before a Site is Selected it needs to connect back to the MNOs Comments • MNOs require connecCon MNO responsible for backhaul to each of MNBL and CTIL • Expensive to share a link and cross transfer traffic MBNL • Commercial concerns with MBNL Site Network being able to see how much traffic is being generated • 100mbps required for each link to support data.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Adjacent to 26 Ash Grove, Upton St Leonards S.18.2222.Ful
    Development Control Committee Schedule 19/02/2019 Item No: 04 Application No. S.18/2222/FUL Site No. PP-07350327 Site Address Land Adjacent To 26, Ash Grove, Upton St Leonards, Gloucestershire Town/Parish Upton St Leonards Grid Reference 386290,215128 Application Full Planning Application Type Proposal Proposed dormer bungalow. Recommendation Permission Call in Request Requested by the Planning Manager Development Control Committee Schedule 19/02/2019 Applicant’s Details Care of Agent Agent’s Details Coombes Everitt Architects Limited, 105-107 Bath Road, Cheltenham, GL53 7LE, Gloucestershire, Case Officer Gemma Davis Application 12.10.2018 Validated CONSULTEES Comments Upton St Leonards PC Received Environmental Health (E) Constraints Within 200m of M5 Upton St Leonards Parish Council Settlement Boundaries (LP) OFFICER’S REPORT MAIN ISSUES o Background o Principle of development o Design and layout o Residential amenity o Highways o Obligations and affordable housing o Other matters DESCRIPTION OF SITE The application site comprises an area of hard-surfacing and a garage block which once served the homes that surround the site. The site is accessed off Ash Grove and sits amongst residential properties to all four sides. The site does not lie within any landscape designation. PROPOSAL The application seeks permission for the erection of a single detached dwelling. REVISED DETAILS None MATERIALS Walls: Red brick Roof: Tile Doors/windows: White UPVc Development Control Committee Schedule 19/02/2019 REPRESENTATIONS Statutory Consultees : Upton St Leonards Parish Council objects to the proposed development on the following grounds: o Loss of parking o Impact on waste vehicles negotiating the site / wider area o Potential loss of bus service The Council’s Environmental Health Officer has recommended standard conditions and informatives, should planning permission be forthcoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucester/Cheltenham/Cotswold
    :al Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 581 Principal Area Boundary Review ELECH )l 3 Al_ C( )NSEQUENTI ALS : TY OF GLOUCEST THOUGH OF CHELTENHAM } STRICT OF COTSWOU THOUGH OFTEWKESBim LOCAL GOVEHN1CTT BOUNDARY COMMISSION ENGLAND REPORT NO .581 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRICS FSVA Members Me K F J Ennals CB Me G R Prentice Mrs H R v sarkany THE RT HON CHRIS PATTEN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT PRINCIPAL AREA BOUNDARY REVIEW; CITY OF GLOUCESTER/BOROUGH OF CHELTENHAM/DISTRICT OF STROUD/BOROUGH OF TEWKESBURY/DISTRICT OF COTSWOLD FINAL PROPOSALS FOR CHANGES TO ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS CONSEQUENTIAL TO PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGES INTRODUCTION 1. On 25 March 1988, we submitted to your predecessor our Report No 547, which contained our final proposals for changes to the administrative boundaries of the City of Gloucester, the Boroughs of Cheltenham and Tewkesbury and the Districts of Cotswold and Stroud. 2. In that report, we stated that we had made no proposals to deal with the electoral conseguences of the proposed boundary changes, and that our final proposals for consequential changes to electoral arrangements would be the subject of a separate report. In view of the nature and extent of the electoral consequences, we decided that they ought to be advertised separately in order to give local authorities and residents affected by them a full opportunity to comment. 3. In your Department's letter of 13 June 1989, we were informed of the then Minister for Local Government's decision, on behalf of the Secretary of State, to modify the proposals made in our Report No 547.
    [Show full text]