DOCSLIB.ORG

Gloucester/Cheltenham/Cotswold

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gloucester/Cheltenham/Cotswold :al Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 581 Principal Area Boundary Review ELECH )l 3 Al_ C( )NSEQUENTI ALS : TY OF GLOUCEST THOUGH OF CHELTENHAM } STRICT OF COTSWOU THOUGH OFTEWKESBim LOCAL GOVEHN1CTT BOUNDARY COMMISSION ENGLAND REPORT NO .581 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRICS FSVA Members Me K F J Ennals CB Me G R Prentice Mrs H R v sarkany THE RT HON CHRIS PATTEN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT PRINCIPAL AREA BOUNDARY REVIEW; CITY OF GLOUCESTER/BOROUGH OF CHELTENHAM/DISTRICT OF STROUD/BOROUGH OF TEWKESBURY/DISTRICT OF COTSWOLD FINAL PROPOSALS FOR CHANGES TO ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS CONSEQUENTIAL TO PROPOSED BOUNDARY CHANGES INTRODUCTION 1. On 25 March 1988, we submitted to your predecessor our Report No 547, which contained our final proposals for changes to the administrative boundaries of the City of Gloucester, the Boroughs of Cheltenham and Tewkesbury and the Districts of Cotswold and Stroud. 2. In that report, we stated that we had made no proposals to deal with the electoral conseguences of the proposed boundary changes, and that our final proposals for consequential changes to electoral arrangements would be the subject of a separate report. In view of the nature and extent of the electoral consequences, we decided that they ought to be advertised separately in order to give local authorities and residents affected by them a full opportunity to comment. 3. In your Department's letter of 13 June 1989, we were informed of the then Minister for Local Government's decision, on behalf of the Secretary of State, to modify the proposals made in our Report No 547. We also noted that his decisions in respect of the boundary between the Boroughs of Cheltenham and Tewkesbury in the Up Hatherley, Leckhampton, Prestbury and Swindon areas would be subject to any comments received by him during a period of three months from the date of his letter. In your Department's subsequent letter of 26 June 1989, we were asked to submit our final proposals for consequential changes to electoral arrangements, based on the modified proposals for boundary changes, by Christmas 1989, so that the Order giving effect to the boundary changes may take effect on 1 April 1991. 4. Since we understand that the final district boundaries in the areas of Up Hatherley, Leckhampton, Prestbury and Swindon have not yet been determined, we cannot at this stage put forward final proposals for changes to the ward and electoral division boundaries in those areas. This report therefore deals with the consequential changes to electoral arrangements for the areas where the district boundaries have been determined, as detailed in your Department's letter of 13 June 1989. The remainder of the electoral consequences in respect of the provisional boundary changes between the Boroughs of Cheltenham and Tewkesbury will be the subject of a separate report. 5. To minimise delay in making the Order giving effect to the proposed boundary changes, we decided to publish our own scheme for consequential changes to electoral arrangements, and to invite comments, rather than to follow our usual procedure of inviting the local authorities concerned to submit draft schemes. We accordingly published our draft proposals for electoral consequences on 6 October 1989, by means of a letter addressed to the County Council of Gloucestershire, the City Council of Gloucester, the Borough Councils of Cheltenham and Tewkesbury, and the District Councils of Cotswold and Stroud. A copy of that letter is attached. Copies were sent at the time to all those persons and bodies who had received a copy of our Report No 547. The County, City, Borough and District Councils were asked to publish a notice giving information about our draft proposals, and to put copies of this on display at places where public notices are customarily displayed. They were also asked to place copies of our draft proposals on deposit for inspection at their main offices. Comments were invited by 17 November 1989. 6. The district wards affected by our draft proposals are dealt with below: BOROUGH OF CHELTENHAM Hatherley - The Reddings area of the Parish of Badgeworth, at present within Crickley Ward of the Borough of Tewkesbury, to be transferred to the Hatherley Ward of the Borough of Cheltenham, which would become a 4-member ward. We recognised that this proposal could create some difficulty for the Borough Council in arranging elections by thirds, but we understood that the Council had already agreed in principle to change to whole council elections which would resolve the issue. At county level, The Reddings area to be transferred to Hatherley electoral division. As explained above the district wards and electoral divisions affected by the provisional boundary changes in the Up Hatherley, Leckhampton, Prestbury and Swindon areas cannot be finalised, as the administrative boundaries have not yet been determined. CITY OF GLOUCESTER QUEDGELEY - A new ward to be created with that name, to consist of the whole parish, with a present electorate of 4986, to be represented by two councillors. At county level, Quedgeley to constitute a new electoral division, UPTON ST LEONARDS - That part of Upton St Leonards proposed for transfer to the City of Gloucester to be included in Matson Ward of the City of Gloucester, At county level, this area to be transferred to Matson electoral division. BOROUGH OF TEWKESBURY Crickley - The Reddings area to be transferred to Hatherley Ward in the Borough of Cheltenham, and the Parishes of Coberley and Cowley, now in this ward, to be transferred to the District of Cotswold. Crickley Ward, thereby reduced in size, to become a 1-member ward. DISTRICT OF STROUD Quedgeley and Hardwicke The Quedgeley part of this ward to be transferred to the City of Gloucester to form a 2-member ward in the City, and a county electoral division of the same name. The remainder of this ward, comprising the Parishes of Elmore, Hardwicke and Longney, to form a new 2-member ward (to be called Hardwicke) in the District of Stroud and, at county level, to be transferred to Severn electoral division. DISTRICT OF COTSWOLD Ermin - The Parishes of Coberley and Cowley to be transferred from the Borough of Tewkesbury to the 1-member Ermin Ward of the District of Cotswold, and to the county electoral division of South Cotswold. 7. Our draft scheme also included proposals for electoral consequentials in respect of the provisional boundary between the Districts of Cheltenham and Tewkesbury in the Up Hatherley, Leckhampton, Prestbury and Swindon areas. As mentioned in paragraph 4 above our final proposals for those areas must form the subject of a further report. In addition, our draft scheme included changes in the electoral arrangements to reflect the minor boundary changes affecting the Parishes of Brookthorpe-with-Whaddon, Elmore, Great Witcombe, Innsworth, Longford, Maisemore, Southam, and Uckington. RESPONSE TO OUR DRAFT PROPOSALS 8. In response to our draft proposals, we received representations from the County Council of Gloucestershire, Gloucester City Council, the District Councils of Cotswold and Stroud, the Borough Council of Cheltenham, the Parish Councils of Hardwicke and Quedgeley, a Member of Badgeworth Parish Council, Gloucester Rural Conservatives, The Rotary Club of Tewkesbury and the Police Federation of England and Wales. Tewkesbury Borough Council confirmed by telephone that it had no comments. 9. Gloucestershire County Council was concerned about the effects of our draft proposals on the county electoral divisions of Mid Tewkesbury and Severn, and felt that within Mid Tewkesbury division there was a lack of geographical relationship between Teddington in the north and Great Witcombe in the south. However, they had .decided to offer no formal observations, in the expectation that a further electoral review of the whole county would be conducted by the mid 1990s. 10. Gloucester City Council suggested that the proposed 2- member Quedgeley Ward should have three councillors, since it envisaged that by April 1991 the electorate would be well above 5000. 11. Cheltenham and Tewkesbury Borough Councils and Cotswold and stroud District Councils all confirmed that they had no comments on our draft proposals. 12. Hardwicke Parish Council opposed our proposal to transfer its parish to the county electoral division of Severn, on the grounds that the division would become too large. Quedgeley. Parish Council and the Gloucester Rural Conservatives both considered that the proposed 2-member Quedgeley Ward merited three councillors. The Member of Badgeworth Parish Council suggested that since The Reddings area was being transferred to the Hatherley Ward of the Borough of Cheltenham, this ward should be renamed "Hatherley and The Reddings,11 to preserve the identity of The Reddings village. The Rotary Club of Tewkesbury and the Police Federation of England and Wales had no comments to make on our draft proposals. OUR FINAL PROPOSALS 13.'As required by Section'60(2)(d) of the Local Government Act 1972, we have;considered the representations made to us in response to our draft proposals. We dealt first with the suggestion from the City Council to increase the number of councillors ""for the proposed Quedgeley Ward of the City-of Gloucester. We noted that while on the basis of the existing electorates, the-degree of under-representatidn -for the proposed12-member ward would be within acceptable limits, an extra councillor would result in a higher degreee^of over- representation "in ttiat'^ward. We therefore concluded that, in the context of the current principal" area boundary review,' there'-was insufficient justification for us-to-modify-our draft "proposal'for a 2-member ward. "However, we have "-before us a request from the City Council for a further electoral review of the City of Gloucester.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment
    GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA For and on behalf of Cheltenham Borough Council Cotswold District Council Forest of Dean District Council Gloucester City Council Stroud District Council Tewkesbury Borough Council Gloucestershire Economic Needs Assessment Prepared by Strategic Planning Research Unit DLP Planning Ltd August 2020 1 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA Prepared by: Checked by: Approved by: Date: July 2020 Office: Bristol & Sheffield Strategic Planning Research Unit V1 Velocity Building Broad Quay House (6th Floor) 4 Abbey Court Ground Floor Prince Street Fraser Road Tenter Street Bristol Priory Business Park Sheffield BS1 4DJ Bedford S1 4BY MK44 3WH Tel: 01142 289190 Tel: 01179 058850 Tel: 01234 832740 DLP Consulting Group disclaims any responsibility to the client and others in respect of matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence. This report is confidential to the client and DLP Planning Ltd accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk. 2 08.19.GL5078PS.Gloucestershire ENA Final GL5078P Gloucestershire ENA CONTENTS PAGE 0.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 6 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 19 a) National
    [Show full text]
  • Tetbury and Tetbury Upton Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Referendum Version October 2017
    Tetbury and Tetbury Upton Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Referendum Version October 2017 1 Neighbourhood Plan Area – designated 1st August 2013 Tetbury and Tetbury Upton Neighbourhood Plan Referendum Version October 2017 2 FOREWORD. Welcome to the Tetbury and Tetbury Upton Neighbourhood Plan. The Tetbury Neighbourhood Plan Working Group have carried out a huge amount of work to produce this Neighbourhood Plan which encompasses all the key planning issues that will affect the town in the future. Neighbourhood Plans are a new type of planning document following on from The Localism Act (2011) which introduced Neighbourhood Development Plans as policies that focus on local planning and give communities the opportunity to become involved in their future. For some years now Tetbury has been discussing what shape the town should take into the future, ‘Planning for Real’ was probably the first public consultation that gave townspeople the opportunity to describe their forward vision and following this there have been a number of public consultations and workshops that have contributed to the content of this plan. Discussions have also taken place with planning professionals, landowners, developers, local organisations, local health professionals, neighbouring parish councils and the District Council. The proposals that result from these discussions are in this document and they will determine the way that our town can develop into the future. The Tetbury community now has a chance to approve the plan in a referendum. Tetbury Town Council is very grateful for the huge amount of work carried out by the Neighbourhood Plan Working Group without their commitment and dedication we would not have such a quality document that reflects joint working between many local organisations and the community consultations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy In
    The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire March 2019 the gloucestershire agrifood and rural economy final report.docx March 2019 The Scale and Impact of the Farming, Food, Drink & Rural Economy in Gloucestershire Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 Gloucestershire’s Agriculture and Food Sector .......................................................................... 6 UK & Global Context .............................................................................................................. 6 The Scale of Gloucestershire Agriculture and pre Consumer Food Chain .............................. 8 The Consumer End of the Gloucestershire Food Chain .........................................................15 Non Farming Enterprises and diversification..........................................................................16 Major Companies in the Gloucestershire Agricultural, Food & Drink Sector ...........................18 The ‘End to End’ Food Chain .................................................................................................19 Gloucestershire’s Rural Economy .............................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • The Leigh Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan 2020-2036
    Regulation 14 draft for consultation January 2021 The Leigh Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan 2020-2036 The Leigh Neighbourhood Development Plan Regulation 14 Draft, January 2021 2 The Leigh Neighbourhood Development Plan Regulation 14 Draft, January 2021 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 The Leigh Parish Neighbourhood Development Plan ............................................................................. 5 Neighbourhood Plan Area and Period .................................................................................................... 7 Background to The Leigh and the NDP ................................................................................................... 9 Flooding................................................................................................................................................. 10 Demographic profile ............................................................................................................................. 16 Parish Aspirations ................................................................................................................................. 16 Community Action Point ....................................................................................................................... 17 The Development Plan .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Various Roads, Churchdown, Tewkesbury Borough) (Variation) Order 2020
    GLOUCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ON STREET PARKING ORDER 2017 (VARIOUS ROADS, CHURCHDOWN, TEWKESBURY BOROUGH) (VARIATION) ORDER 2020 NOTICE is hereby given that Gloucestershire County Council has made a Variation Order under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, the effect of which would vary the Gloucestershire County Council On Street Parking Order 2017 (the 2017 Order) by introducing the proposed restrictions described in the Schedule below along all/part of the various roads described within Churchdown in the Borough of Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire. THE SCHEDULE No Waiting At Any Time Road Name, Extent Number Craven Drive Along sections on both sides of the carriageway at the junctions of Hazelcroft Road No 42611 (Road No 45719) and Martindale Road (Road No 42612). Martindale Along a section on both sides of the carriageway at its junction with Craven Road Drive (Road No 42611). Road No 42612 Hazelcroft Along a section on both sides of the carriageway at its junction with Craven Road No 45719 Drive (Road No 42611). Station Road Along a section on the western side of the carriageway between its junction Road No 3/80 with Church Road (Road No 3/80) and the Primary School entrance. Along a section on the eastern side of the carriageway close to its junction with Barnhay (Road No 72047) Station Road Road No 3/364 Along a section on both sides of the carriageway at its junction with Pirton Lane (Road No 3/364). Pirton Lane Along sections on the eastern side of the carriageway close to its junction with Road No 3/364 Station Road (Road No 3/364) and Vicarage Close (Road No 47843).
    [Show full text]
  • Recruitment Pack Board of Trustees the Roses Theatre Is Looking for New Members to Join the Board of Trustees
    Recruitment Pack Board of Trustees The Roses Theatre is looking for new members to join the Board of Trustees. The role will support the organisation in the next stage of its development as it recovers from the impact of Covid-19 and implements a new business plan and strategy. The Trust is specifically seeking a board member with qualifications in accountancy. Board members are expected to: • Attend up to 12 board meetings a year and a board “Away Day” for in-service training. • Meetings are normally 6-8pm pm at the theatre on a Wednesday. • Read papers prepared by the staff. • Be prepared to introduce professional and personal contacts for the benefit of the theatre. • Join a committee or a task-related working party from time to time. • Attend arts events at the theatre in order to have a better understanding of the theatre’s work. • Support, advocate and participate in the fundraising activities of the theatre. • Attend certain networking events and undertake advocacy for the theatre. • Give informal advice and support to theatre staff where appropriate. The Roses Is an equal opportunities employer. About The Roses The Roses is a 374 seat mixed arts centre in Gloucestershire and is the largest cultural organisation in the Borough of Tewkesbury. It welcomes around 80,000 visitors every year and provides wide-ranging events both to the local community and to tourists visiting the medieval market town. Originally built in 1974 to provide a cultural heart for Tewkesbury, an extension in 2015 expanded the venue’s front of house space and created a new bar and coffee shop.
    [Show full text]
  • Stroud District Local Plan Review Draft Local Plan Consultation
    Stroud District Local Plan Review: Draft Local Plan Consultation The Berkeley Estate Stroud District Local Plan Review Draft Local Plan Consultation Representations prepared by Savills on behalf of ‘The Trustees of the Berkeley Settlement’ (The Berkeley Estate) savills.co.uk January 2020 1 Stroud District Local Plan Review: Draft Local Plan Consultation Introduction 1. These representations have been prepared by Savills on behalf of The Berkeley Estate (TBE) in response to the consultation on the Draft Stroud District Local Plan (Draft LP) which ends on 22 January 2020. 2. The Berkeley family, who remain integral to TBE, has been associated with Berkeley since the 12th Century. The family’s long term commitment to the area, its community and the rural economy means that the use/development of its land is important to its legacy. For the same reason, TBE also engages with the development of the wider District, and takes an active interest in the Development Plan process. 3. TBE land interest is focused in the south western part of the District, extending to approximately 6,000 acres in Gloucestershire’s Berkeley Vale. It includes a mediaeval Deer Park, a number of farms let to farming tenants (where the families have often been on the land for generations), cottages, offices, a hotel and two pubs. TBE also owns the New Grounds at Slimbridge, where the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust is based, and about five miles of the bed of the River Severn. It is a vibrant business providing employment and business opportunities. 4. Specific comments within these representations are made in respect of the proposed allocations relating to the ‘land at Focus School, Wanswell’, ‘Sharpness Garden Village’ and ‘Wisloe Garden Village’.
    [Show full text]
  • In 1968. the Report Consists of the Following Parts: L the Northgate Turnpike Roads 2 Early Administration and the Turnpike Trust
    Reprinted from: Gloucestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 1971 pages 1-58 [This edition was reprinted in 1987 by the Author in Hong Kong with corrections and revised pagination] THE NQRIH§AIE.IHBNBlKE N SPRY For more than one hundred and seventy years the road from the city of Gloucester to the top of Birdlip Hill, and the road which branched eastwards from it up Crickley Hill towards Oxford and later London, was maintained from the proceeds of the various turnpikes or toll gates along it. This report examines the history and administration of these roads from their earliest period to the demise of the Turnpike Trust in l87l and also details excavations across the road at Wotton undertaken in 1968. The report consists of the following Parts: l The Northgate Turnpike roads 2 Early administration and the Turnpike Trust 3 Tolls, exemptions and traffic 4 Road materials 5 Excavations at Wotton 1968 I Summary II The Excavations III Discussion References 1 IHE.NQBIH§AIE.BQADfi The road to Gloucester from Cirencester and the east is a section of the Roman road known as Ermine Street. The line of this road from Brockworth to Wotton has been considered to indicate a Severn crossing at Kingsholm one Km north of Gloucester, where, as late as the seventeenth century, a major branch of the river flowed slightly west of modern Kingsholm. The extent of early Roman archaeological material from Kingsholm makes it likely to have been a military site early in the Roman period. (l) Between Wotton Hill and Kingsholm this presumed line is lost; the road possibly passed through the grounds of Hillfield House and along the ridge, now marked by Denmark Road, towards the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Schemes+Tros Notified to Hyrec As at 17 December 2019 Page1 of 16
    PARISH APPROX GRID REF SCHEME_NO DESCRIPTION "Forest" - 919 A4136 'Whole Route' Improvements - & -; Depends on location - refer to Projects 920 part02of02 - "A38 to Berkeley scheme", improvement at Alkington 701/983 AlkingtonLn/A38 junction, near Heathfield Cottage. - & -; minor road widening/improvement Alvington 601/005 S116 for section of verge o/side Hillcroft, Knapp Lane, Alvington - & -; stopping-up (application received under S116HA1980) TCPA Order Made 12/02/2014 at 18 Jesson Road, Bishops Cleeve - Bishops Cleeve 965/271 now capable of being implemented. - & -; stopping-up (short length of footway to allow development) GCCTRO-Jun18 Bourton-o-t-Water waiting restrictions - around Bourton on the Water 170/210 Roman Way / Moor Lane junction - & -; waiting/loading restrictions (NWAAT) GCCTRO-Jun18 Bourton-o-t-Water waiting restrictions - High Street & - & -; waiting/loading restrictions (part NWAAT, NLAAT, Limited Bourton on the Water 167/207 part Rectory Lane Waiting, Disabled Bays, NoWaiting/Loading 11am-5pm) GCCTRO-Jun18 Bourton-o-t-Water waiting restrictions - High Street, Bourton on the Water 168/205 Station Rd, Rissington Rd junction - & -; waiting/loading restrictions (NWAAT, NLAAT) Bourton on the Water 162/209 GCCTRO-Jun18 Bourton-o-t-Water waiting restrictions - Lansdowne - & -; waiting/loading restrictions (NWAAT & NoWaiting9am-6pm) GCCTRO-Jun18 Bourton-o-t-Water waiting restrictions - Letch Hill Bourton on the Water 166/203 Drive - & -; waiting/loading restrictions (No waiting 9am-6pm) GCCTRO-Jun18 Bourton-o-t-Water waiting
    [Show full text]
  • Stroud Labour Party
    Gloucestershire County Council single member ward review Response from Stroud Constituency Labour Party Introduction On 30 November the Local Government Boundary Commission started its second period of consultation for a pattern of divisions for Gloucestershire. Between 30 November and 21 February the Commission is inviting comments on the division boundaries for GCC. Following the completion of its initial consultation, the Commission has proposed that the number of county councillors should be reduced from 63 to 53. The districts have provided the estimated numbers for the electorate in their areas in 2016; the total number for the county is 490,674 so that the average electorate per councillor would be 9258 (cf. 7431 in 2010). The main purpose of this note is to draw attention to the constraints imposed on proposals for a new pattern of divisions in Stroud district, which could lead to anomalies, particularly in ‘bolting together’ dissimilar district wards and parishes in order to meet purely numerical constraints. In it own words ‘the Commission aims to recommend a pattern of divisions that achieves good electoral equality, reflects community identities and interests and provides for effective and convenient local government. It will also seek to use strong, easily-identifiable boundaries. ‘Proposals should demonstrate how any pattern of divisions aids the provision of effective and convenient local government and why any deterioration in equality of representation or community identity should be accepted. Representations that are supported by evidence and argument will carry more weight with the Commission than those which merely assert a point of view.’ While a new pattern of ten county council divisions is suggested in this note, it is not regarded as definitive but does contain ways of avoiding some possible major anomalies.
    [Show full text]
  • Upton St Leonards Life Incorporating Church News
    Upton St Leonards Life incorporating Church News Issue 4 December 2014 This wonderful picture of a snowy day in Upton was painted by local artist and villager Sue Gage. It won the 2014 President’s Cup at the Gloucestershire Society of Artists. Congratulations Sue! (Picture reproduced with permission) your hand at a couple of fiendish prize …is a packed one! A lot of news and puzzles! reports and details of the many events Do have a really good look at the diary, coming up. Upton School kids have the BMI ad on the back page and the created their own kids’ page. Try out Church pages to see the large number a novel Christmas Cake, make this of events you can join in to mark this beautiful Christmas wreath, or try special season. 1 (the 5th November) What a great evening it was at the annual Village Hall bonfire The food was provided, as always, by the Portway Farm Shop and and firework display! Everything was as we wished for we know how popular their sausages and burgers are. We always including perfect weather conditions, a cloudless sky and no have very favourable comments about them. wind. Chipmunks Nursery made and donated the guy. There Village Hall Bonfire Night Winners: was a deluge; not rain, just people. They kept on coming. The Treasure Hunt - Elizabeth Quant folks on the gate were under great pressure and those working Sweets in the jar - Bridie McCann in the kitchen serving the food were exhausted at the end, Teddy Bear’s name - Millie Warner having sold everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the Gloucester City Council Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the Gloucester City Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents with surnames A-H. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Gloucester District Personal Details: Name: Theresa Allen E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: As a resident of , Quedgeley I wish to protest about being moved to Kingsway Ward. We are an established part of Quedgeley, Gloucester. completely inappropriate. Putting the parts of the exsiting Quedgeley into Kingsway would mean that we wouldn't be represented correctly, the needs of Old Quedgeley are completely different to the new and up and coming Kingsway. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4957 03/03/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Gloucester District Personal Details: Name: Mr Argent E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 2: Use Lobleys Drive as boundary 1: Use Abbeymead Avenue as boundary Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Use Abbeymead Avenue as boundary Annotation 2: Use Lobleys Drive as boundary Comment text: . We are well served by local services, the majority of which are located in Hucclecote, for example Hucclecote library, the playing fields (King George V Playing Fields), the community centre, dentist, doctors, shops, banks etc. Most of the primary school aged children in our street go to Dinglewell School, which is also in Hucclecote. With this in mind, it makes sense for the voters within our street to have the democratic right to have their say on these vital services that they actually use daily.
    [Show full text]