Page 1 Ph.D. Program Psychology Faculty's Publication (2010-2017)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Page 1 Ph.D. Program Psychology Faculty's Publication (2010-2017) Page 1 Ph.D. Program Psychology Faculty’s Publication (2010-2017) # Faculty's Name Affiliated Training Areas Akinsulure-Smith, 1. Adeyinka M. Clinical@ City 2. Alvero, Alicia M. Behavior Analysis 3. Beeler, Jeff A Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 4. Berger, Sarah Developmental Psychology 5. Billies, Michelle Critical Social/ Personality Psychology Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 6. Bodnar, Richard Collaborative);Clinical@ Queens 7. Borod, Joan Clinical@ Queens 8. Brauner, Elisabeth Cognition, Language, & Development; Basic & Applied Social Psychology 9. Brooks, Patricia Cognition, Language, & Development; Developmental Psychology 10. Brown, Bruce L. Behavior Analysis Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 11. Brumberg, Joshua Collaborative);Clinical@ Queens 12. Carmichael, Cheryl Basic & Applied Social Psychology 13. Chapman, Hanah Basic & Applied Social Psychology 14. Chapman, Hanah Basic & Applied Social Psychology 15. Chauhan, Preeti Clinical@ John Jay 16. Chodorow, Martin Cognition, Language, & Development Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 17. Chua, Elizabeth Collaborative);Cognition, Language, & Development 18. Claudia Brumbaugh Clinical@ Queens; Basic & Applied Social Psychology Cohen-Charash, 19. Yochi Industrial/Organizational Psychology 20. Crossman, Angela Clinical@ John Jay; Developmental Psychology; Psychology & Law 21. Crump, Matthew Cognition, Language, & Development 22. Daiute, Colette Developmental Psychology; Critical Social/ Personality Psychology Animal Behavior & Comparative Psychology; Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative);Cognition, Language, & 23. Delamater, Andrew Development Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative);Health 24. Dennis, Tracy A. Psychology & Clinical Science 25. Drake, Jennifer Cognition, Language, & Development; Developmental Psychology 26. Duncan, Robert Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 27. Eatough, Erin Industrial/Organizational Psychology 28. Falkenbach, Diana Clinical@ John Jay 29. Fine, Michelle Critical Social/ Personality Psychology; Environmental Psychology 30. Fondacaro, Mark Psychology & Law 31. Forlano, Paul Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) Page 2 # Faculty's Name Affiliated Training Areas Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 32. Gao, Yu Collaborative);Cognition, Language, & Development 33. Ghirlanda Stefano Animal Behavior & Comparative Psychology; Cognition, Language, & Development Gillespie-Lynch, 34. Kristen Developmental Psychology 35. Glasford, Demis Basic & Applied Social Psychology Basic & Applied Social Psychology; Psychology & Law; Critical Social/ Personality 36. Goff, Phillip Psychology 37. Golub, Sarit Basic & Applied Social Psychology 38. Good, Catherine Basic & Applied Social Psychology 39. Gordon, James Cognition, Language, & Development 40. Gottdiener, William Clinical@ John Jay Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 41. Grose-Fifer, Jill Collaborative);Clinical@ John Jay; Psychology & Law 42. Halperin, Jeffrey Clinical@ Queens 43. Harold Goldstein Industrial/Organizational Psychology 44. Hart, Roger Environmental Psychology 45. Hatcher, Robert Clinical@ City 46. Hill, Darryl Basic & Applied Social Psychology Animal Behavior & Comparative Psychology; Behavioral and Cognitive 47. Horvitz, JOn Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 48. Jeglic, Elizabeth Clinical@ John Jay 49. Jin Fan Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 50. Joel Erblich Health Psychology & Clinical Science Johnson, Matthew 51. B. Clinical@ John Jay 52. Jones, Emily Behavior Analysis; Clinical@ Queens 53. Karasik, Lana Developmental Psychology 54. Kassin, Saul Psychology & Law Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 55. Kluger, Alan Collaborative);Clinical@ Queens 56. Katz, Cindi Environmental Psychology 57. Kovera, Margaret Basic & Applied Social Psychology; Psychology & Law 58. Kozbelt, Aaron Cognition, Language, & Development 59. Kurylo, Daniel D. Cognition, Language, & Development 60. Lahti, David Animal Behavior & Comparative Psychology 61. Leippe, Michael Basic & Applied Social Psychology; Psychology & Law Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 62. Li, Andrea Collaborative);Clinical@ Queens 63. Logue, Alexandra Behavior Analysis 64. Luttrell, Wendy Critical Social/ Personality Psychology 65. Lyness, Karen Industrial/Organizational Psychology Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 66. Mangels, Jennifer Collaborative);Cognition, Language, & Development 67. Mano, Itzhak Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) Page 3 # Faculty's Name Affiliated Training Areas 68. Markus, Keith A. Clinical@ John Jay; Psychology & Law 69. Mazzula, Silvia Clinical@ John Jay McDonough, 70. Laraine Cognition, Language, & Development 71. McWilliams, Kelly Developmental Psychology; Psychology & Law 72. Miranda, Regina Cognition, Language, & Development; Health Psychology & Clinical Science 73. Moller, Peter Animal Behavior & Comparative Psychology 74. Mooney, Jayne Basic & Applied Social Psychology; Critical Social/ Personality Psychology 75. Naidoo, Loren Industrial/Organizational Psychology 76. Nikulina, Valentina Clinical@ Queens 77. O'Neill, Sarah Clinical@ City 78. OPOTOW, Susan Critical Social/ Personality Psychology Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 79. Oviedo, Hysell Collaborative);Cognition, Language, & Development 80. Park, Jaihyun Basic & Applied Social Psychology; Industrial/Organizational Psychology 81. Parsons, Jeffrey Health Psychology & Clinical Science 82. Penrod, Steve Psychology & Law Animal Behavior & Comparative psychology; Behavioral and Cognitive 83. Preuss, Thomas Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 84. Ranaldi, Robert Animal Behavior & Comparative Psychology; Behavior Analysis 85. Rendina, Jonathan 86. Revenson, Tracey Health Psychology & Clinical Science 87. Ricker, Timothy Cognition, Language, & Development 88. Ro, Tony Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) ROSARIO, 89. MARGARET Clinical@ City ROSARIO, 90. MARGARET Health Psychology & Clinical Science 91. Rothstein, Hannah Industrial/Organizational Psychology 92. Ruck, Martin Developmental Psychology 93. Saegert, Susan Environmental Psychology 94. Scherbaum, Charles Industrial/Organizational Psychology 95. Sclafani, Anthony Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 96. Sekerina, Irina Cognition, Language, & Development Animal Behavior & Comparative Psychology; Behavior Analysis; Behavioral and 97. Serrano Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 98. Shane, Jacob Cognition, Language, & Development; Developmental Psychology 99. Silverstein, Brett Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 100. silzer, robert Industrial/Organizational Psychology 101. Sommer, Kristin Basic & Applied Social Psychology; Industrial/Organizational Psychology 102. Starks, Tyler Health Psychology & Clinical Science 103. Stetsenko Anna Developmental Psychology 104. Stewart, Jennifer Clinical@ Queens 105. Stone, Charles B. Psychology & Law Page 4 # Faculty's Name Affiliated Training Areas Cognition, Language, & Development; Clinical@ Queens; Basic & Applied Social 106. Storbeck, Justin Psychology 107. Stoudt, Brett Critical Social/ Personality Psychology 108. Strange, Deryn Psychology & Law 109. Su, Celina Critical Social/ Personality Psychology; Environmental Psychology 110. Sussman, Nan Industrial/Organizational Psychology 111. Tolman, Deborah Critical Social/ Personality Psychology 112. Tuber, Steven Clinical@ City 113. Tyrel, Starks Health Psychology & Clinical Science 114. Wagner, Jennifer Developmental Psychology Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience 115. Walder, Deborah Collaborative);Clinical@ Queens; Health Psychology & Clinical Science 116. Wang, Hoau-Yan Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative) 117. Watts, Logan Industrial/Organizational Psychology Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience( CUNY Neuroscience Collaborative);Cognition, Language, & Development; Health Psychology & Clinical 118. Weierich, Mariann Science 119. Weiss, Rebecca Clinical@ John Jay Widom, Cathy 120. Spatz Clinical@ John Jay Wupperman, 121. Peggilee Clinical@ John Jay 122. Yanos, Philip Clinical@ John Jay 123. Zapf, Patricia Clinical@ John Jay Page 5 Name (Last, PEER-REVIEW PUBLICATIONS, BOOKS AND BOOK CHAPTERS (2010-2017): First) (*) before the faculty name and a plus sign (+) before any doctoral student name. Akinsulure- Akinsulure-Smith, A.M., Chu, T., & Krivitsky, L. (in press). West African Smith, immigrant perspectives on female genital cutting: Experiences, attitudes Adeyinka M. and implications for mental health service providers. Journal of International Migration and Integration, (IF: 0.873) Lanfranchi, M., & Akinsulure-Smith, A.M. (in press). The role of mental health counselors in international human rights: Reflections on counseling services with urban refugees at the Refugee Law Project in Kampala, Uganda. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, (IF: 0.518) Akinsulure-Smith, A.M., & Conteh, J.A. (in press). The emergence of counseling in Sierra Leone. Journal of Counseling and Development. (IF: 1.216) Akinsulure-Smith, A.M., Anosike, E., & Nwaubani, K. (2017).
Recommended publications
  • Toward an Integrative Science of the Brain and Crime
    BioSocieties https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-019-00167-3 COMMENTARY Mind the gap: toward an integrative science of the brain and crime Eyal Aharoni1 · Nathaniel E. Anderson2 · J. C. Barnes3 · Corey H. Allen4 · Kent A. Kiehl2 © Springer Nature Limited 2019 In the recent article, Criminalizing the brain: Neurocriminology and the production of strategic ignorance, Fallin et al. (2018) argue that most neuroscientists working with antisocial populations are guilty of suppressing, obfuscating, and erasing legiti- mate social explanations for criminal behavior as part of a strategic attempt to tout their reductionist preconceptions of behavior and to advance their own professional, extra-scientifc agendas. While we applaud their call for greater inclusion of social/ contextual factors into neurocriminological research, we fnd that they overstate the case against neurocriminology and understate important eforts by this emerg- ing community to generate signifcant and cross-disciplinary contributions to the understanding of antisocial behavior. Learning to identify and avoid such mischar- acterizations is critical for the pursuit of much-needed interdisciplinary research and collaboration on the prediction, explanation, and remediation of antisocial behavior. By critically evaluating Fallin et al.’s claims, we hope to strike a conciliatory bal- ance, which is more likely to promote integration rather than antagonism between disciplines. Fallin and colleagues correctly describe biosocial criminology as an emerging discipline that integrates historically neglected biological factors and neuroscientifc methods in the study of antisocial behavior. Indeed, this paradigm has demonstrated the value of genetics (Brunner et al. 1993), physiology (Latvala et al. 2015), bio- chemistry (Coccaro et al. 1998), and neuroimaging (Anderson and Kiehl 2012) for * Eyal Aharoni [email protected] 1 Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroscience, Law, and Ethics T
    International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 65 (2019) 101459 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Law and Psychiatry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijlawpsy Introduction Neuroscience, Law, and Ethics T In his influential Hardwired Behavior: What Neuroscience Reveals concerning the relevance of neurosciences to the law, especially crim- about Morality (2005), Laurence Tancredi combined neuroscience, inal law.” (Meynen, 2016, p. 3, Meynen, 2014; Morse & Roskies, 2013; psychology, philosophy, legal theory and clinical cases to insightfully Glenn & Raine, 2014; Chandler, 2018). One example is the use of examine the role of brain structure and function in moral behavior. neuroimaging to support behavioral evidence in judging whether a Analyzing how neurobiology shapes reasoning and decision-making, he person performing a criminal act met cognitive and volitional condi- discussed questions such as whether or to what extent we have free will tions necessary for criminal responsibility. Functional imaging re- and can be morally and criminally responsible for our actions. Is our cording abnormal activity in prefrontal-limbic pathways may indicate behavior hardwired and thus determined by the brain? Is free will an impaired cognitive and emotional processing and impaired capacity to illusion? Can mental content be explained entirely in terms of neural deliberate and consider the consequences of what one does or fails to content? If the brain influences but does not determine behavior, then do. This and other forms of imaging may eventually offer a more fine- how much of what we think and do is up to us? In his new book, grained account of impaired inhibitory mechanisms in the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • The New BRAIN
    SPECIAL EDITION The New BRAIN MACLEAN’S EBOOK Contents Introduction Join us for a giant brainstorming session on what the world’s neuroscience superstars are keeping top of mind The glia club Once dismissed as ‘glue,’ glial cells, neuron’s little brother, have become the lodestone of brain research. But is it a good idea for scientists to herd in one direction? Charlie Gillis How to build a brain A philosopher and engineer has created the most complex simulated brain in the world. On $30,000 a year. Nick Taylor-Vaisey Mad beauty A conceptual photographer dusts off the jars of a brain collection from a Texas mental hospital David Graham They grow up so fast The latest research on a baby’s remarkable brain development, from recognizing right and wrong to the gift of memory Rosemary Counter Gone baby gone Why don’t we remember anything from earliest childhood? It’s called infantile amnesia. Emma Teitel MACLEAN’S EBOOK THE NEW BRAIN Memory and gender Emma Teitel The young and the restless No one knows why autistic kids are often night owls, but their parents can take heart: science is looking at some biological causes based in the brain Katherine DeClerq Crying out for attention How one psychologist is offering hope to parents worried about the stigma, safety and side effects of ADHD medication Hannah Hoag Mind the age gap Previously dismissed as lesser or defective, new research is revealing that the teenage brain is just as powerful as any adult’s Rosemary Counter No brawn, no brains Genetics may decide your upper and lower limits for cognitive
    [Show full text]
  • Tanksley, J.C
    Identifying psychological pathways to polyvictimization: evidence from a longitudinal cohort study of twins from the UK Peter T. Tanksley, J.C. Barnes, Brian B. Boutwell, Louise Arseneault, Avshalom Caspi, Andrea Danese, Helen L. Fisher, et al. Journal of Experimental Criminology ISSN 1573-3750 J Exp Criminol DOI 10.1007/s11292-020-09422-1 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Nature B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Journal of Experimental Criminology https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09422-1 Identifying psychological pathways to polyvictimization: evidence from a longitudinal cohort study of twins from the UK Peter T. Tanksley1 & J.C. Barnes1 & Brian B. Boutwell2,3 & Louise Arseneault4 & Avshalom Caspi4,5,6,7 & Andrea Danese4,8 & Helen L. Fisher4 & Terrie E. Moffitt4,5,6,7 # Springer Nature B.V. 2020 Abstract Objectives Examine the extent to which cognitive/psychological characteristics predict later polyvictimization. We employ a twin-based design that allows us to test the social neurocriminology hypothesis that environmental factors influence brain-based charac- teristics and influence behaviors like victimization.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroimaging Abnormalities in Neurological Patients with Criminal Behavior
    Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports (2018) 18:47 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0853-3 BEHAVIOR (H S KIRSHNER, SECTION EDITOR) Neuroimaging Abnormalities in Neurological Patients with Criminal Behavior R. Ryan Darby1 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Purpose of Review Criminal behavior occurs in previously law-abiding neurological patients, including patients with traumatic brain injury, focal brain lesions, and dementia. Neuroimaging abnormalities in these patients allow one to explore the potential neuroanatomical correlates of criminal behavior. However, this process has been challenging because (1) It is difficult to determine the temporal relationship between criminal behavior and neurological disease onset; (2) Abnormalities in several different brain regions have been associated with criminal behavior; and (3) It is difficult to quantify neuroimaging abnormalities in individual subjects. Recent Findings Recent studies have begun to address these concerns, showing that neuroimaging abnormalities in patients with criminal behavior localize to a common brain network, rather than a single specific brain region. New methods have been developed to identify atrophy patterns in individual patients, but have not yet been used in neurological patients with criminal behavior. Summary Future advances will be important for making sure that neuroimaging data is used in a responsible manner in legal cases involving criminal behavior. Keywords Criminal . Moral . Brain lesions . Neurology . Frontal lobe . Brain networks Introduction he was killed by police [2]. At autopsy, he was found to have a malignant tumor in his right temporal lobe, prompting ques- Neurological diseases can cause profound changes to behav- tions about the degree to which his brain injury contributed to ior.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| Sex, Gender, and Sexuality the New Basics 3Rd Edition
    SEX, GENDER, AND SEXUALITY THE NEW BASICS 3RD EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Abby L Ferber | 9780190278649 | | | | | Sex, Gender, and Sexuality Learn more. The Occupied Territories? It integrates a variety of selections, including first-person accounts and narratives, poems, theoretical analyses, and critiques of existing research. Sex, gender, and sexuality : the new basics ; an Gender by Abby L Ferber. Virginia Woolf 's legacy as well as " Adrienne Rich 's call for women's revisions of literary texts, and history as well, has galvanized a generation of feminist authors to reply with texts of their own". Julia Kristeva has significantly developed Sex field of semiotics. In politics, gender can be viewed as a foundational discourse that political actors employ in order to position themselves on a variety of issues. Search Start Search. Tamsin Wilton,? The Gender People's Government supports studies of gender and Sexuality The New Basics 3rd edition social development of gender in history and practices that lead to gender equality. Book Description Condition: New. From Beyond the Closet? ConnellMichael Kimmeland E. The last decade has seen the number of women's studies PhD programs grow to at least 10 — most of them relatively new. Download a preview. In Russia gender studies is currently tolerated; however, state-supported practices that push a view related to perspectives on the gender of those in power — e. Your list has reached the maximum number of items. The concept of gender performativity is at the core of philosopher and gender theorist Judith Butler's work Gender Trouble. The online hub is also regularly updated to ensure you have access to the most up-to-date information on sexual health and best practices for teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neurobiology of Violence: Biological Roots of Crime
    The Neurobiology of Violence: Neurocriminology CHARLES J. VELLA, PHD APRIL 9, 2015 THANKS TO ADRIAN RAINE, CHRISTOPHER M. FILLEY, KENT KIEHL This presentation is based on these books The Anatomy of Violence: The Psychopath The Biological Roots of Crime Whisperer by Adrian Raine by Kent Kiehl 2013 2015 Punishment of crime We should know the difference between who we are angry at and who we are afraid of. Protection for society: We need to segregate from society those of whom we are afraid Rehabilitation: We need to rehabilitate those with whom we are angry Aspen Neurobehavioral Conference Consensus Statement (Filley et al. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 2001; 14: 1-14) Working group representing neurology, psychiatry, neuropsychology, trauma surgery, nursing, evolutionary psychology, ethics, and law Aggression can be adaptive, but violence is a an aggressive act characterized by the unwarranted infliction of physical injury Violence can result from brain dysfunction, although social and evolutionary factors also contribute Study of neurobehavioral aspects – frontal lobe dysfunction, altered serotonin metabolism, and the influence of heredity – promises to lead to deeper understanding NGRI: Not Guilty by reason of insanity Not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) is a verdict issued in criminal cases whereby the defendant, determined to be legally insane, is held not responsible for his or her criminal actions The legal test of insanity, the right and wrong test as stated in the M’Naghten case (1843): did not know
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Psychopathy As a Neuroscience Construct
    AN EXPLORATION OF PSYCHOPATHY AS A NEUROSCIENCE CONSTRUCT Silvian Roy A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts in Criminology. © Silvian Roy, Ottawa, Canada, 2018 Department of Criminology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa ii ABSTRACT Hare’s psychopathy construct as defined by the Psychopathy Checklist- Revised has been utilized internationally as a risk assessment instrument for quite some time. Despite this, since its inception it has and continues to raise criticism from the academic community. There is ongoing debate over what the construct entails and how it should be used. Most recent developments in the construct revolve around it being defined as a neurological manifestation. To explore the psychopathy construct’s connection with neuroscience, this thesis focusses on one foundational experiment by the most prominent team of researchers in the field. The exploration borrows from Science and Technology Studies, more specifically Actor-Network Theory and the semiotic of scientific texts. The goal of this analysis is not to criticize nor defend the psychopathy construct, but rather explore the facticity of psychopathy as a neuroscientific fact. Considering the widespread use of the construct across criminal justice systems and mental health practices, understanding the facticity of psychopathy is imperative. Our contention is that psychopathy as defined by neuroscience was not merely a pre-discovered fact of nature, but rather it is a fact that is hybrid; it is both built by researchers and a part of our natural world, social and real. Our findings reveal that the facticity of psychopathy as a neuroscience construct is reliant on it being a Boundary Object: a scientific object that is able to intersect multiple social worlds through its adaptability (Star & Griesemer, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Tasks 3 Publication Without Notice
    ANTH207 Psychological Anthropology S2 Day 2018 Dept of Anthropology Contents Disclaimer General Information 2 Macquarie University has taken all reasonable measures to ensure the information in this Learning Outcomes 2 publication is accurate and up-to-date. However, the information may change or become out-dated as a result of change in University policies, General Assessment Information 3 procedures or rules. The University reserves the right to make changes to any information in this Assessment Tasks 3 publication without notice. Users of this publication are advised to check the website Delivery and Resources 5 version of this publication [or the relevant faculty or department] before acting on any information in Unit Schedule 8 this publication. Policies and Procedures 9 Graduate Capabilities 10 Changes from Previous Offering 15 Changes since First Published 15 https://unitguides.mq.edu.au/unit_offerings/82581/unit_guide/print 1 Unit guide ANTH207 Psychological Anthropology General Information Unit convenor and teaching staff Unit convenor Gabriele Marranci [email protected] Contact via [email protected] +61-2-9850-8040 TBA on iLearn Payel Ray [email protected] Credit points 3 Prerequisites ANTH150 or ANTH151 or (12cp at 100 level or above) or admission to GDipArts Corequisites Co-badged status Unit description This unit introduces psychological anthropology, including emotional, cognitive, developmental, and perceptual dynamics across cultures. Psychological anthropology studies the relation between individual psychology and sociocultural diversity, for example, between psychopathology and social structure, between personality differences and childrearing practices, or between perceptual experience and a society's ideologies about the senses. We will explore a wide range of perspectives, from evolutionary psychology to neuroanthropology, and address such topics as consciousness including spirit possession, and cultural variation in insanity and impairment.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTH207 Psychological Anthropology S2 Day 2016
    ANTH207 Psychological Anthropology S2 Day 2016 Dept of Anthropology Contents Disclaimer General Information 2 Macquarie University has taken all reasonable measures to ensure the information in this Learning Outcomes 2 publication is accurate and up-to-date. However, the information may change or become out-dated as a result of change in University policies, Assessment Tasks 3 procedures or rules. The University reserves the right to make changes to any information in this Delivery and Resources 6 publication without notice. Users of this publication are advised to check the website Unit Schedule 8 version of this publication [or the relevant faculty or department] before acting on any information in Policies and Procedures 8 this publication. Graduate Capabilities 10 Changes from Previous Offering 15 https://unitguides.mq.edu.au/unit_offerings/56857/unit_guide/print 1 Unit guide ANTH207 Psychological Anthropology General Information Unit convenor and teaching staff Unit convenor Gabriele Marranci [email protected] Contact via [email protected] +61-2-9850-8040 TBA on iLearn Credit points 3 Prerequisites ANTH150 or ANTH151 or 12cp or admission to GDipArts Corequisites Co-badged status Unit description This unit introduces psychological anthropology, including emotional, cognitive, developmental, and perceptual dynamics across cultures. Psychological anthropology studies the relation between individual psychology and sociocultural diversity, for example, between psychopathology and social structure, between personality differences and childrearing practices, or between perceptual experience and a society's ideologies about the senses. We will explore a wide range of perspectives, from evolutionary psychology to neuroanthropology, and address such topics as consciousness including spirit possession, and cultural variation in insanity and impairment.
    [Show full text]
  • BOP: Gender Differences in Predictors of Prison Violence; Assessing The
    CRIMEHarer , Langan & DELINQUENCY / PREDICTORS / OCTOBER OF PRISON 2001 VIOLENCE Gender Differences in Predictors of Prison Violence: Assessing the Predictive Validity of a Risk Classification System Miles D. Harer Neal P. Langan Can the same risk classification instrument be used for both female and male prisoners? The authors answer this question using data for federal prisoners by comparing female and male prison violence rates and by comparing the predictive validity of a risk classifi- cation instrument used to predict female and male violence. The authors find women commit less violence and less serious violence than men. However, despite these gender differences, they find the same classification instrument predicts violent behavior equally well for women and men. Taken together, these results lead the authors to argue for correctional policies requiring separate classification systems for women and men. In recent years, a number of criminologists have called for empirical research addressing their suspicions that prisoner risk classification systems originally designed for men are less accurate in predicting female violent misconduct (Brennan, 1998; Burke & Adams, 1991; Farr, 2000). These authors note research showing that female rates for most violent crimes are substantially lower than rates for men and, moreover, that evidence suggests the circumstances in which women are violent often differ from the circum- stances in which men are violent. For example, Steffensmeier and Allen (1998) reported that the female arrest rate for homicide in 1995, as computed with data reported by the FBI, was 1.7 per 100,000 women, whereas the male rate was 16.6 per 100,000 men—nearly 10 times the female rate.1 In addition, data pertaining to the circumstances in which women and men kill show that women are more likely to kill a family member or boyfriend, whereas men are more likely to kill an acquaintance or stranger (Greenfeld & Snell, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Clinical Neuroscience Free
    FREE BASIC CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE PDF Paul A. Young,Paul H. Young,Daniel L. Tolbert | 464 pages | 26 Feb 2015 | Lippincott Williams and Wilkins | 9781451173291 | English | Philadelphia, United States Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating Basic Clinical Neuroscience. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Basic Clinical Neuroscience by Paul A. Young. Paul H. Daniel L. Basic Clinical Neuroscience offers medical and other health professions students a clinically oriented description of human neuroanatomy and neurophysiology. This text provides the anatomic and pathophysiologic basis for understanding neurologic abnormalities through concise descriptions of functional systems with an emphasis on medically important structures and clinicall Basic Clinical Neuroscience Clinical Neuroscience offers medical and other health professions students a clinically oriented description of human neuroanatomy and neurophysiology. This text provides the anatomic and pathophysiologic basis Basic Clinical Neuroscience understanding neurologic abnormalities through concise descriptions of functional systems with an emphasis on medically important structures and clinically important pathways. It emphasizes the localization of specific anatomic structures and pathways with neurological deficits, using anatomy enhancing 3-D illustrations. Basic Clinical Neuroscience also includes boxed clinical information throughout the text, a key term glossary section, and review questions at the end of each chapter, making this book comprehensive enough to be an excellent Board Exam preparation resource in addition to a great professional training textbook. The fully searchable text Basic Clinical Neuroscience be available online at thePoint.
    [Show full text]