DOCSLIB.ORG

A. Minutes from the November 19, 2020 HRTPO Board Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A. Minutes from the November 19, 2020 HRTPO Board Meeting ITEM #7: APPROVAL OF CONSENT ITEMS [Action Requested] A. Minutes from the November 19, 2020 HRTPO Board Meeting Minutes from the November 19, 2020 HRTPO Board meeting are attached. Attachment 7-A RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the minutes. B. HRTPO Financial Statement The Statement of Revenues and Expenditures for the activities of November 2020 is attached. This statement reflects the financial status of the HRTPO as a whole. Attachment 7-B RECOMMENDED ACTION: Accept the HRTPO Financial Statement. HRTPO Board Meeting │ January 21, 2021│ Agenda Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Board Summary Minutes of November 19, 2020 Pursuant to the declared state of emergency in the Commonwealth of Virginia in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the public health and safety of the Board members, staff, and the general public, the HRTPO Board Meeting was held electronically via Zoom with the following in attendance: HRTPO Voting Members in Attendance: Donnie Tuck, Chair (HA) Douglas Pons (WM) Rick West, Vice-Chair (CH) Thomas Shepperd (YK) Frank Rabil (FR) Delegate Stephen Heretick (GA)* Phillip Bazzani (GL) Delegate Jeion Ward (GA) Michael Hipple (JC) William Harrell (HRT) David Jenkins (NN Alternate) Zach Trogdon (WATA) Kenneth Alexander (NO)* Christopher Hall (VDOT) Herbert Green (PQ Alternate) Jennifer DeBruhl (DRPT Alternate)* John Rowe, Jr. (PO) Cathie Vick (VPA Alternate)* Robert Dyer (VB) HRTPO Nonvoting Members in Attendance: Christopher Price (CH) J. Randall Wheeler (PQ)* Amanda Jarratt (FR) Michael Johnson (SH) J. Brent Fedors (GL) Albert Moor (SU) Mary Bunting (HA) Patrick Duhaney (VB)* Randy Keaton (IW) Andrew Trivette (WM)* Scott Stevens (JC)* Neil Morgan (YK) Cynthia Rohlf (NN) Terry Danaher (CAC) Larry “Chip” Filer (NO)* Jenifer Spratley (PAA) HRTPO Executive Director: Robert A. Crum, Jr. HRTPO Other Participants: Ella Ward (CH) LJ Hansen (Suffolk Transit) John Malbon (CTB) CAPT Brad Rosen (US NAVY)* Sheppard Miller (CTB)* Scott Denny (VDA) Kevin Page (HRTAC) Todd Halacy (VDOT) COL Ed Vedder (Langley-Eustis) HRTPO Voting Members Absent: William McCarty (IW) Senator Mamie Locke (GA) William Gillette (SH) Senator Lionell Spruill, Sr. (GA) Linda Johnson (SU) HRTPO Board Meeting Summary Minutes – November 19, 2020 – Page 1 Prepared by C. Mulkey Attachment 7-A HRTPO Nonvoting Members Absent: LaVoris Pace (PO) Terry Garcia-Crews (FTA) Jeffrey Breeden (FAA) Larry Ewan (FTAC) Thomas Nelson, Jr. (FHWA) Robert Bowen (NAA) HRTPO Staff in Attendance: Mike Kimbrel John Mihaly Robert Case Kendall Miller Kathlene Grauberger *Denotes late arrival or early departure Others Recorded Attending: Jim Long and David Westcott (Chesapeake); Cole Fisher (Virginia Beach); Drew Lumpkin (Senator Mark Warner’s Office); Diane Kaufman (Senator Tim Kaine’s Office); Michael Stallings (Smithfield); Michael King (US Navy); and Keith Cannady, Kelli Arledge, Logan Grimm, Krista Lauro, Cynthia Mulkey, and Sheila Wilson (HRPDC Staff). Mr. Robert Crum, HRTPO Executive Director, stated that pursuant to the declared state of emergency in the Commonwealth of Virginia and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the health and safety of the Board members, staff, and the general public, the HRTPO meeting was being held electronically via Zoom. These electronic meetings are required to complete essential business on behalf of the region. Per the requirements of the Code of Virginia, the meeting notice, agenda, and supporting documentation were posted on the HRTPO website for public review. HRTPO staff also provided electronic copies of this information to Board members and other interested parties. A recording of the meeting will be available on the HRTPO website. Additionally, the meeting was live-streamed and available for viewing on the Regional Connection YouTube channel. The general public was provided an opportunity to comment on the meeting agenda via two options: 1. Members of the public were invited to submit comments to the HRTPO Board via email. 2. Members of the public were also invited to call into a dedicated phone line where comments could be recorded for the HRTPO Board. No public comments were received as of 48 hours before the meeting. HRTPO Board Meeting Summary Minutes – November 19, 2020 – Page 2 Prepared by C. Mulkey Attachment 7-A Mr. Crum reviewed a few important housekeeping rules in order for the HRTPO meeting to run smoothly: 1. All Board members were asked to remain on mute before and after providing input. 2. All Board members were asked to identify themselves by name and locality/agency when speaking and/or providing a motion or second. 3. All votes taken must be made by roll call vote and recorded in the minutes. On behalf of the HRTPO staff, Mr. Crum thanked everyone for their commitment to the region and their cooperation and patience during the electronic meeting. HRTPO staff indicated that a quorum was present. Call to Order The November 19, 2020 Meeting Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization was called to order by Chair Donnie Tuck at 10:35 a.m. Approval of Agenda Chair Donnie Tuck asked for a motion to approve the November 19, 2020 HRTPO Board Meeting Agenda as presented. Motion: Mayor John Rowe Moved to approve the Agenda as presented; seconded by Mr. William Harrell. With no questions or comments, a roll call vote was conducted and the votes were recorded as follows: Chesapeake Mayor Rick West Aye Franklin Mayor Frank Rabil Aye Gloucester County Mr. Phillip Bazzani Aye Hampton Mayor Donnie Tuck Aye Isle of Wight County Mr. William McCarty Absent James City County Mr. Michael Hipple Aye Newport News Mr. David Jenkins Aye Norfolk Mayor Kenneth Alexander Aye Poquoson Mr. Herbert Green Aye Portsmouth Mayor John Rowe Aye Southampton County Mr. William Gillette Absent HRTPO Board Meeting Summary Minutes – November 19, 2020 – Page 3 Prepared by C. Mulkey Attachment 7-A Suffolk Mayor Linda Johnson Absent Virginia Beach Mayor Robert Dyer Aye Williamsburg Mayor Douglas Pons Aye York County Mr. Thomas Shepperd Aye HRT Mr. William Harrell Aye WATA Mr. Zach Trogdon Aye VDOT Mr. Christopher Hall Aye DRPT Ms. Jennifer DeBruhl Aye VPA Ms. Cathie Vick Absent General Assembly Senator Mamie Locke Absent General Assembly Senator Lionell Spruill, Sr. Absent General Assembly Delegate Stephen Heretick Absent General Assembly Delegate Jeion Ward Aye The Motion Carried with 17 votes in favor, none against, and no abstentions. The roll call vote also served as the record of attendance and a quorum was confirmed. Executive Director Report Mr. Robert Crum, HRTPO Executive Director, referenced his monthly report and provided an update regarding the Regional Transit Advisory Panel (RTAP). Mr. Crum recounted that during the 2020 General Assembly session, the legislature passed House Bill 1726 and Senate Bill 1038 which created the Hampton Roads Regional Transit Fund (HRRTF). As part of this action, the General Assembly included a provision that the HRTPO establish an RTAP to provide ongoing advice during the planning process. Mr. Crum reported that the first RTAP meeting was held on November 18, 2020 with 67 community representatives participating. Mr. Crum indicated that HRTPO staff prepared a Resolution of Appreciation to recognize Mayor John Rowe for his service to the HRPDC, HRTPO, HRTAC, and the region. Chair Donnie Tuck expressed his appreciation for Mayor Rowe’s friendship and support. Mr. Crum listed some of the many regional initiatives that the HRTPO was involved in under Mayor Rowe’s leadership. On behalf of HRTPO staff and the Board, Mr. Crum thanked Mayor Rowe for his guidance and support. Mayor Rowe expressed his appreciation for the sentiments. He stated that he is excited about the cooperative and collaborative efforts of the region and complimented the HRPDC HRTPO Board Meeting Summary Minutes – November 19, 2020 – Page 4 Prepared by C. Mulkey Attachment 7-A and HRTPO. He said he was honored to serve the region and attributed all accomplishments to the HRTPO Board members’ efforts. Mr. Crum asked Ms. Kelli Arledge, HRPDC Human Resources Administrator, to virtually present the Resolution of Appreciation, and the Board members applauded. Mr. Crum indicated that HRTPO staff prepared an additional Resolution of Appreciation to recognize Mr. Mike Kimbrel, HRTPO Deputy Executive Director, for his service to the organization. Mr. Crum shared that at the end of 2020, Mr. Kimbrel planned to retire after 31 years. Mr. Kimbrel began as an HRTPO intern and spent his entire career working for the HRTPO. Mr. Crum asked Ms. Arledge to virtually present the Resolution of Appreciation, and the Board members applauded. *Ms. Cathie Vick joined the meeting Mr. Kimbrel thanked Mr. Crum and the HRTPO Board members for the recognition. He said he was honored and thankful for the opportunity to serve the Board and the people of Hampton Roads since 1989. Public Comment Period The public was provided an opportunity to comment in advance of the meeting by email or phone. Chair Donnie Tuck stated that HRTPO staff received no comments via either option as of 48 hours before the meeting. Hampton Roads Regional Coordinated Transit Program Update Mr. Robert Crum reported that during the 2020 General Assembly session, the legislature passed House Bill 1726 and Senate Bill 1038 which created the Hampton Roads Regional Transit Fund (HRRTF). One of the responsibilities of the HRTPO related to this legislation is to coordinate efforts among the three transit systems within the Hampton Roads region. To initiate this process, Mr. William Harrell, HRT President and CEO, and Mr. Josh Moore, WATA Deputy Executive Director, briefed the HRTPO Board at its meeting on October 15, 2020. As a continuation of this effort, Mr. Crum introduced Mr. LJ Hansen, Suffolk Public Works Director, to brief the Board regarding Suffolk Transit’s plans and opportunities for its transit system. Mr. Hansen reported that Suffolk Transit is city-owned and contractor-operated by Virginia Regional Transit. Based on an efficiency study in 2011, Suffolk Transit separated from HRT in 2012 and currently serves Downtown Suffolk, Northern Suffolk, and provides a connection from Downtown Suffolk to an HRT hub in the Chesapeake Square Mall area of Chesapeake.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marmaray Project - Turkey
    MARMARAY PROJECT - TURKEY Istanbul is a city where historical and cultural values must be preserved and at the same time modern railway facilities have to be installed to decrease the environmental impact of public transportation and increase the capacity, reliability and comfort of the railway systems. The Project provides an upgrading of the commuter rail system in Istanbul, connecting Halkalı on the European side to the Asian side with an uninterrupted, modern, high-capacity commuter rail system. Railway tracks in both sides of Istanbul Strait will be connected to each other through a railway tunnel connection under the Istanbul Strait. The line goes underground at Yedikule, continues through the Yenikapı and Sirkeci new underground stations, passes under the Istanbul Strait, connects to the Üsküdar new underground station and emerges at Sögütlüçesme. The entire upgraded and new railway system will be approximately 76 km long. The main structures and systems; include the immersed tube tunnel, bored tunnels, cut-and-cover tunnels, at - grade structures, three new underground stations, 37 surface stations (renovation and upgrading), operations control centre, yards, workshops, maintenance facilities, upgrading of existing tracks including a new third track on ground, completely new electrical and mechanical systems and procurement of modern railway vehicles. The idea of a railway tunnel under the Istanbul Strait was first raised in 1860. However, where the tunnel under the Istanbul Strait crosses the deepest parts of the Strait, the old-fashioned techniques would not allow the tunnel to be on or under the seabed, and therefore the design indicated a "floating" type of tunnel placed on pillars constructed on the seabed.
    [Show full text]
  • TBM FACT Sheet (Lgrev).Pub
    Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel Parallel Thimble Shoal Tunnel Project For more contest information, visit www.cbbt.com/TBMNamingContest/ For more project information, visit www.cbbt.com/parallelthimbleshoaltunnel/ Tunnel Boring Machine To Cape Charles, VA PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel is a 17.6 mile bridge and tunnel complex that spans the lower Chesapeake Bay and connects Virginia’s Eastern Shore with the mainland in Virginia #2 Island Proposed Beach. The Parallel Thimble Shoal Tunnel project will involve the construction of a two-lane bored tunnel from the CBBT’s southernmost island (#1 Island) under Thimble Shoal Channel to #2 Island. This will be the FIRST bored roadway tunnel in the Hampton Roads region as well as the Commonwealth. Not only did this bored tunnel solution offer a less expensive Parallel Existing Thimble Thimble Shoal Shoal Tunnel price tag, but it will have less environmental impact than the traditional immersed tube tunnel construction and will have less impact on the ship traffic that sails Thimble Shoal Channel. Tunnel When complete, this tunnel, which runs parallel to the existing tunnel, will carry southbound traffic headed towards Virginia’s mainland. CONTRACTOR: Chesapeake Tunnel Joint Venture COST: $755,987,318 Hydraulic Rams What is a Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM)? Rotating Arm A TBM is a machine used to excavate tunnels. This machine operates #1 Island like a giant drill, but one that builds as it drills. Here’s how it works: The large rotating cutter head scrapes away soil under the bay bottom. The soil is removed from the machine via a large conveyor system and hauled away.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Engineering
    Civil Engineering Volume 170 Issue CE2 May 2017 ■ Stabilising Lyme Regis – a strategic approach ■ Planning and procuring the Shatin–Central cross-harbour rail tunnel, Hong Kong ■ Innovative uses of thermal imaging in civil engineering ■ Sustainable post-earthquake reconstruction in Pakistan www.civilengineering-ice.com ISSN 0965 089 X Call for Papers Cities of the future Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Civil Engineering SPECIAL ISSUE Editors: Philippe Bouillard, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium and Priti Parikh, University College London, London, UK Civil Engineering is planning a special issue for Why publish with ICE? 2018 on cities of the future. Access to ICE membership – ICE Publishing, as the publishing arm of ICE, is the only publisher The 21st century has seen a rapid increase in population with over 50% of the that brings you direct access to ICE’s worldwide world’s population living in cities. According to report from the Organisation membership of 80 000. for Economic Co-operation and Development, the urban population will Visibility – we also have thousands of readers increase from less than 1 billion in 1950 to roughly 6 billion by 2050 to who are not members of ICE, from corporations, around 9 billion people by end of this century. Rapid urbanisation has brought to governments, to universities. Our journals in pressures and challenges for the built environment, infrastructure and are included in major engineering indexes and resource allocation in cities. There is a need to rethink engineering design and resources. strategies for future cities. This can be achieved by going beyond the physical appearance and by Quality – our journals’ reputation for quality focusing on different representations, properties and impact factors of the is unsurpassed, ensuring that the originality, urban system.
    [Show full text]
  • I-64/Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel (HRBT) – Project Update
    Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel Expansion: Project Development Update May 17, 2018 James S. Utterback HRBT Project Director Virginia Department of Transportation 5/17/2018 Ten Hampton Roads Tunnels Chesapeake Channel Tunnel (1964) Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel (1957 & 1976) Thimble Shoal Tunnel (1964) Monitor-Merrimac Memorial Bridge- Tunnel (1992) Midtown Tunnel Downtown (1962 & 2016) Tunnel (1952 & 1987) 5/17/2018 3 • • • 5/17/2018 1950 Future tunnel #11 at Thimble Shoal will be bored tunnel Thimble Shoal will Future tunnel#11at 1 tunnel is concrete-box immersed tube 9 tunnels immersed tubes are steel-shell Downtown Tunnel #1 1955 Hampton Roads #1 1960 Midtown Tunnel #1 1965 Thimble Shoal #1 & Chesapeake #1 1970 of Tunneling 65 Years in Hampton Roads 1975 Hampton Roads #2 1980 1985 Downtown Tunnel #2 1990 Monitor-Merrimac 1995 2000 2005 2010 1976 2015 Midtown Tunnel #2 4 2020 HRBT Expansion - Scope of Work . Between Settlers Landing in Hampton and I-564 in Norfolk . Improvements in I- 64 including the construction of a new 4 lane HRBT tunnel . New 4 lane HRBT tunnel will serve Eastbound traffic . 2 existing HRBT tunnels will serve Westbound traffic Proposed Tunnel Alignment (Hampton Side) 6 5/17/2018 Proposed Tunnel Alignment (Norfolk Side) 5/17/2018 7 Proposed Lane Configuration for Tunnel and Approach Bridges 2+1+1 concept in each direction: • 2 free General Purpose lanes • 1 full-time HOT lane • 1 peak-hour HOT lane on left shoulder 5/17/2018 8 Tunnel Considerations Landside work has risks but is largely conventional Tunnel work is less
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Wave Passage on Immersed Tube Tunnels - Busan Geoje Fixed Link in South Korea
    IABSE SYMPOSIUM WEIMAR 2007 The effect of wave passage on immersed tube tunnels - Busan Geoje Fixed Link in South Korea Ronald HEIJMANS Peter JACKSON Dr. Thomas KASPER Civil Engineer Geotechnical Engineer Civil Engineer ARCADIS Infra, Cowi Cowi Amersfoort, The Netherlands Copenhagen, Denmark Copenhagen, Denmark [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Guido MEINHARDT Jean SCHMITT Dr. Hessel VOORTMAN Geotechnical Engineer Project Engineer-in-charge Hydraulic Engineer ARCADIS Infra Ingerop ARCADIS Infra, Amersfoort, The Netherlands Paris, France Amersfoort, The Netherlands [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Summary A special feature of the Busan-Geoje Fixed Link in South Korea is the foundation of an immersed tube tunnel in a trench of soft marine clay. The tunnel is subject to wave loads due to 9.2 meter high hurricane waves which jeopardize the stability of the tunnel. Analytical analyses, scale model tests and numerical analyses have been made to investigate this problem. This paper gives an overview of the analyses, performed from schematization of the non-linear waves to pressure variations at seabed, modelling of the wave induced groundwater flow and its effects on the tunnel buried in the seabed. This is followed by a discussion of the results and consequences for the design of the tunnel. Keywords: immersed tube tunnel; wave effect; numerical modelling, non-linear waves 1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction of the project The Busan Geoje Fixed Link consists of an 8.2 km long motorway with two large cable stayed bridges and a 3.3 km long immersed tube tunnel as main structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Analysis of an Immersed Tunnel in Izmir
    Dynamic analysis of an immersed tunnel in Izmir Análisis dinámico de un túnel sumergido en Izmir Isfendiyar Egeli (Main Author) Usak University, Civil Engineering Department Bir Eylul Campus, 64000, Usak (Turkey) İ[email protected] Cagdas Gurbuz (Corresponding Author) Graduate Research Student, Izmir Institute of Technology Urla Campus, 35430, Izmir (Turkey) [email protected] Manuscript Code: 885 Date of Acceptance/Reception: 17.04.2018/27.01.2017 DOI: 10.7764/RDLC.17.1.103 Abstract The original design of the planned Izmir Bay Immersed Tube Tunnel, considered it to be a continuous subsea tunnel for the whole length of about 7.6 km. But this was later changed into having 2 shorter tubes of 2.7 km long each connected thru’ a 2.2 km long artificial island created in the middle of the bay from the excess dredged material, a concept which also reduces costs and increases efficiency. This island will serve as a venue for the 2025 Expo Exhibition, which Izmir city will apply to organize in the future. Reason for the research study was to provide a preliminary design, using a dynamic analysis, during the current pre-feasibility stage, of the immersed tunnel to show whether it can be built across the Izmir Bay. This paper takes into account the new alignment and presents the results of a 2-D dynamic analysis conducted of the prefabricated 100m long tunnel elements, sitting within a backfilled dredged ditch, dug after the recommended ground improvement was carried out. Analyses considered staged construction and the results showed that: Tunnel units and its surrounding soils inside the dredged ditch act together to provide a better earthquake response with a damping effect of the earthquake force; Tunnel units do not float to the sea surface, but continued to stay inside the dredged ditch and applied positive stresses to the foundations during the design earthquakes.
    [Show full text]
  • HRBT EXPANSION Magazine
    HRBT EXPANSION Spring 2020 HRBT EXPANSION Magazine IN THIS ISSUE Project Project Tunnel Boring Community Overview Timeline Approach Outreach 5 6 12 14 ABOUT THE PROJECT TEAM HRBT Message from Jim Utterback EXPANSION As the largest project in VDOT history, the HRBT Expansion Secretary of Transportation Project Financing TABLE OF Project is the long-awaited improvement to a major CONTENTS chokepoint in Hampton Roads. We’ve assembled a world- Shannon Valentine Project Team ........................... 3 class team of experts in bridge and tunnel construction. Project Overview ................ 4-5 We are currently working in the design phase with construction anticipated in Summer 2020. In the meantime, Project Timeline ..................6-7 VDOT Executive Committee the team is working on utility relocations and other Commonwealth History Of The Tunnels ......8-9 preparation activities to support construction. While much Stephen Brich: Commissioner Transportation Board Staff Spotlight ..................... 10 of the work (tunnel) will be happening underwater, there is Robert Cary: Deputy Commissioner still a lot of marine works and interstate widening as part Barton Thrasher: Chief Engineer Economic Impact .................. 11 of the project. By 2021, construction will be well underway, Boring Tunnels ..................12-13 so please drive safely and be mindful of crews working HRBT Project Management $3.8 Billion Project is Community Outreach ......14-15 along the interstate. We are committed to delivering 100% Funded James Utterback: Project
    [Show full text]
  • Tunnel Projects – Fhwa Participation
    William M. Bergeson Federal Highway Administration Senior Tunnel Engineer WE ENJOY DRIVING THOUGH OUR TUNNELS BUT WHAT ABOUT TUNNEL SAFETY ? AND DANGERS TO TUNNEL OCCUPANTS ? AND STEWARDSHIP OF PUBLIC ASSETS ? NEED FOR TUNNEL INSPECTIONS NATIONAL TUNNEL INSPECTION STANDARDS • Final Stages of Approval – Office of Management and Budget – 90 days for review • Publication in the Federal Registrar – NTIS effective 30 days after publication STATUS OF THE NTIS Milestone Projected Actual Date Date To OST 11/12/2014 11/06/2014 To OMB 03/19/2015 03/27/2015 OMB Clearance 06/19/2015 Publication Date 06/26/2015 HOW WILL THE NTIS BE ROLLED OUT? • Publication of the NTIS in the Federal Registrar • Concurrent FHWA online publication of the: – TOMIE Manual – SNTI • Webinar announcement with presentation • National Tunnel Inspection Training Course • FHWA resources deployed as necessary – Division Bridge Engineers – Bridge Engineers in FHWA Resource Center – Engineers in FHWA headquarters AFTER PUBLICATION OF NTIS • Download and read the: – National Tunnel Inspection Standards (NTIS) • TOMIE Manual • SNTI • Ask your FHWA Division Bridge Engineer for: – NTIS Webinar information – National Tunnel Inspection Training Course • 8 sessions • Certification of 2 State DOT employees – Program Manager – Team Leader WHAT IS IN THE ROLLOUT WEBINAR ? • Information will be presented to explain: – What is the NTIS – What are the differences and similarities: • NTIS TOMIE ~ BIRM/MCEB/MBE SNTI ~ Coding Guide • NBIS NTI ~ NBI – What FHWA resources are available – What are the timelines for • Reporting • compliance – What is the compliance process WHAT IS THE NTIS? • The National Tunnel Inspection Standards – Regulations have the effect of law • Read the last 20 pages – 650.501 Purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Design and Analysis for an Immersed Tube Tunnel Across the Izmir Bay
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by DSpace@IZTECH Institutional Repository PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS FOR AN IMMERSED TUBE TUNNEL ACROSS THE İZMİR BAY A Thesis Submitted to The Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of İzmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER SCIENCE in Civil Engineering by Nisa KARTALTEPE October 2008 İZMİR ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Assist. Prof. Dr. Gürsoy TURAN and my co-supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. İsfendiyar EGELİ for their guidance, supervisions, and support throughout this study. I also would like to special thanks to Asst. Prof. Dr. Engin AKTAŞ, who is the member of thesis committee, for their contributions to this thesis. I also would like to thanks to other members of the thesis committee, Asst. Prof. Dr. Şebnem ELÇİ and Asst. Prof. Dr. Yusuf ERZİN. I would like to thank to DLH (The State Railways, Ports, Airports Authority) and KGM (Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Highways) for providing us technical reports and data. Thanks to research assistances at IYTE Department of Civil Engineering who helped me in anyway along this study. Also special thanks to Anıl ÇALIŞKAN and Aslı BOR for their good friendships and love. I offer sincere thanks to my husband Barbaros KARTALTEPE for all his boundless love, continuous support, understanding, and patience. Finally, I would like to thank my father, my mother and my sisters for all their love, support, and encouragement. iii ABSTRACT PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND ANALYSIS FOR AN IMMERSED TUBE TUNNEL ACROSS THE İZMİR BAY In this study, a preliminary design and analysis of an immersed tube tunnel is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Factors Analyses and Preventive Measures of Immersed Tunnel Engineering
    E3S Web of Conferences 23 6 , 02025 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123602025 ICERSD 2020 Risk factors analyses and preventive measures of immersed tunnel engineering Jiao Zhang*, Sainan Fu, Jianping Zhu, Jiancheng Wang School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shanghai Urban Construction Vocational College, Shanghai 200432, China Abstract. Based on the comprehensive analyses of many risk factors leading to accidents in immersed tunnel engineering, it is concluded that the risk factors leading to accidents in immersed tunnel engineering are very large and must be paid attention to in all aspects at all stages of the project. This paper classifies and identifies the risk factors in immersed tunnel engineering by investigating and visiting the relevant investigation, design and construction units of immersed tunnel, and then puts forward prevention and control measures to provide theoretical basis for the prevention of risk factors in Immersed Tunnel Engineering in the future and the risk management of the whole project. 1 Introduction 2 Visit and Research Plan The world's first railroad immersed tunnel was completed in 1901 in the United States. Since Hong Kong built 2.1 Research purpose China’s first cross-port immersed tunnel in 1972, it has By visiting and researching the construction parties of been applied more and more to our country’s cross-river various tunnel projects and experts, studying the potential, and sea-crossing projects. With the advantages of not appearance and development trend of various risk factors, being affected by weather and not affecting navigation, as identifying and analyzing the types of risk factors in well as crossing large-span straits, the immersed tunnel immersed tunnel engineering, corresponding risk method is more and more widely adopted by Chinese management measures are proposed, which provides tunnel builders.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Activity Report 2013
    BRAZIL - Activity Report 2012 TURKEY ACTIVITY REPORT 2013 Turkish Road Association (TRA) - Yollar Türk Milli Komitesi (YTMK) KGM Sitesi F Blok Kat: 1, 06100 Yücetepe - Ankara / Turkey E-mail : [email protected] Web: www.ytmk.org.tr TRA is an open association. Its function is to promote, coordinate and spread studies and research in the field of roads, highways, motorways, tunneling and other underground works. TRA was established on January 25, 1990. TRA has been a Member Nation of ITA since 1994. The main activities of the Association can be summarized as follows: - Developing the coordination between related national and international organizations. - Supporting the development of transportation network and transportation infrastructure in Turkey. - Following-up and supporting the latest developments in transportation and all related techniques, design, construction and sharing the knowledge and innovations among related institutions. - Organizing meetings, seminars and congress in order to evaluate and disseminate the accumulated knowledge, scientific and technological developments, in national and international domain. - Collecting, publishing and distributing all sorts of related information to its members in order to rise the road standards up to international level. TURKEY – Activity Report 2013 In Design Phase: Under Construction : New Zigana Tunnel: The Eurasia Tunnel Project: The Istanbul New Zigana Tunnel is under design phase. Strait Road Crossing Project will be The tunnel is twin tube each of which 12800 constructed in Istanbul. 14.6km route m. in length. There will be 23 cross-passages, including a 5.4km twin-deck tunnel with two 24 lay-bay areas, 1 escape tunnel and 2 U- lanes that will cross the Bosphorus beneath Turn passages.
    [Show full text]
  • TUST Vol. 8, Nr. 2, Pp
    Chapter I: INTRODUCTION by AHMET GURSOY Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. U.S.A. PAUL C. VAN MILLIGEN Stmkton Betonbouw The Netherlands Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vo|. 8, No. 2, pp. 119-121, 1993. 0886-7798/93$6.00 + .00 Printed in Great Britain. Pergamon Press Ltd 1 19 Chapter 1: Introduction 1. IMMERSED TUBE TUNNEL TECHNOLOGY--AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE 2. HISTORY OF THE WORRING GROUP 3. CONTENTS OF THE REPORT 4. ACKNOWI.EDGMENTS 120 TuN~.v.~a ~m UI~'D~GZOUNVSPACE TZC~OLOaY Volume 8, Number 2, 1993 1. Immersed Tube Tunnel Since thon, the WorkingGroup mem- herein can offer solutions for cro~ings Technology =n International bers have met ahout a d~ tJm~witifin invery deep waters. Terhni~lly speak- Perspective the past four years. In addition to ing, the floatgug t,,-n,d options wrAm. sped_',bpurpose meetings, the Gnmp ined in tK~ section offer weU-known It is with great satisfaction that we met during ITA Congress mean n and techniqu~ from off-shore constmctmn, present herewith our report on various during various speciality conferem~. as well as from immm~od tube t]lnnel aspects of ;~,-m~ed tube tunnel tech- Duringthe 1989meet~Bgin ]Mr- n~-k,~- construction. We believe that the ~me niques, based on worldwide input of ter, England, slx toplcs wore adopted for to put such construction into practice bmnel experts from the U.S.A.; from future publioatloxL Five of these topics has arrive~ various European countries, including were selected for publication for the Swedon, Norway, D~nm-~k, the United 1993 ITA meeeng in Am.terd.m It is 4.
    [Show full text]