DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 8Th October 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 8Th October 2019 Planning and Highways Meeting Tuesday 8th October 2019 Sutton Coldfield Town Hall 7pm Present Cllrs D. Allan, L. Allen, Briggs, Hodgins, Horrocks (Chairman), Jolley & Simper. In Attendance Olive O’Sullivan – Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Natalia Gorman – Senior Administrator. There were two members of the public and no press present. 35 Apologies for Absence The CEO received apologies from Cllr M Puri. Resolved to accept the apologies received. 36 Declarations of Interest Cllrs Briggs declared a non pecuniary interest as an affected resident of planning application 2019/07090/pa. Cllrs Horrocks declared a non pecuniary interest as an affected resident of planning application 2019/07090/pa and a pecuniary interest in application 2019/05155/pa. 37 Minutes of Last Meeting Resolved that the minutes of the meeting of Planning & Highways Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 3rd September 2019 be signed as a true record of the meeting. 38 Matters Arising None. 39 Additional Heritage Gateway Sign The Chairman thanked Town Council and Birmingham City Council (BCC) Officers for progressing with the option to include a heritage gateway sign at Steetly Lane / Hardwick Road / Rosemary Hill Road / Thornhill Road / Roman Road. Committee agreed that the junction of Streetly Lane and Rosemary Hill Road was the most appropriate location. In addition, the Chairman advised of a proposal from Cllr S Ward to include Heart of England In Bloom recognition of Sutton Coldfield’s 2019 Gold Medal on Heritage Signs. The CEO Page | 1 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 8th October 2019 advised that costs to include this would be minimal. Members were in favour of recognising the Town’s achievement in this year’s Heart of England In Bloom competition. Resolved that Committee approve the approved location for an additional Heritage sign at the junction of Streetly Lane and Rosemary Hill Road Resolved to approve that the works to commission technical drawings for the signage and the manufacture and installation of the sign above be funded from the Signage Replacement budget previously approved by the Planning and Highways Committee Resolved that officers be delegated to progress the works and report back to Committee once complete. Resolved that officers be delegated in consultation with the Chairman to progress with design work to recognise Sutton Coldfield’s 2019 Gold Medal on Heritage Signs. 40 Wildflower Planting Committee agreed that the 2019 wildflower planting scheme had been a great addition to the Town. There was a general discussion around whether the entire area of Monmouth Drive should be planted with wildflowers. Members were concerned that vehicles are regularly parked on the verges of this area and this may destroy the planting scheme. The Chairman proposed that Town Council officers work alongside BCC officers to identify suitable locations in particular around Monmouth Drive and if locations are not found the budget will be rolled forward. Cllr Simper suggested that Churchill Road in Reddicap ward be considered for Wildflower Planting. Resolved to approve the locations for wildflower planting, taking into consideration Members comments around Monmouth Drive and Churchill Road Resolved to recommend to Full Council that £20,500 be committed from the landscaping budget to fund the proposal planting Resolved to recommend to Full Council that Birmingham City Council and its contractors are commissioned to deliver the works under the Town Council’s Financial Regulation 11.3. 41 Planning Applications (i) Schedules of Planning Applications for Sutton Coldfield Town Council Area Four Oaks Ward 29th August – 2nd October 2019 Application Number Site Address Development Description SCTC Recommendation 10 Blackberry Gardens Conversion of existing garage into 2019/08116/PA Four Oaks Sutton No Objection habitable room Coldfield B74 4JR Page | 2 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 8th October 2019 Erection of two storey front, first 5 Clarry Drive Sutton floor side, single storey rear 2019/07924/PA No Objection Coldfield B74 2RA extensions and installation of front boundary walls and gates 4 Royal Park Close Erection of single storey rear 2019/07702/PA Sutton Coldfield No Objection extension Birmingham B74 4RL 46 Hartopp Road Sutton Four Oaks Erection of single storey rear 2019/07787/PA No Objection Sutton Coldfield extension Birmingham B74 2QR 24 Longdon Drive Erection of single storey side and 2019/07638/PA Sutton Coldfield No Objection rear extensions Birmingham B74 4RF Erection of two storey side and 11 Ladywood Road rear extensions, single storey Four Oaks Sutton side, rear and forward extensions 2019/07595/PA No Objection Coldfield Birmingham and installation of dormer B74 2SW window to rear, alterations to front elevation. Objection. Members expressed concerns that there is a lack of clarity within the proposals. There appears to be a lack of vehicle access to 22 Wavenham Close Erection of two storey rear the proposed garage and 2019/07433/PA Sutton Coldfield B74 extension and single storey members would like to 4NZ detached garage to rear see better artistic impressions of the designs to fully comprehend the proposals for this application. Application to determine the 129 Walsall Road Four details for condition number 3 2019/07107/PA Oaks Sutton Coldfield (submission of external finish No Objection B74 4NR materials) attached to approval 2019/01745/PA Erection of two and single storey 47 Jervis Crescent rear, with juliet balcony to rear, 2019/07273/PA Sutton Coldfield B74 No Objection single storey forward and porch 4PN extensions Page | 3 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 8th October 2019 Objection. Members strongly object to this Proposed telecommunications proposal. The mass of SW Crown PH Walsall upgrade, installation of the telecommunications 2019/07090/PA Road Sutton Coldfield replacement Phase 8 monopole upgrade is not typically Birmingham B74 4RA with wraparound cabinet at base seen in a residential area and associated works and therefore is out of keeping with the surrounding area. Mere Green Ward 29th August- 2nd October 2019 Application Number Site Address Development Description SCTC Recommendation Prior Approval for proposed Barn at Hill Common change of use from agricultural Farm Hillwood 2019/07777/PA building to dwellinghouse (Use No Objection Common Road Sutton Class C3) and associated building Coldfield B75 5QH operations 414 Lichfield Road Sutton Four Oaks Erection of single storey side 2019/07818/PA No Objection Sutton Coldfield B74 extension 4BL 87 Cremorne Road Non-material amendment to Four Oaks Sutton 2019/07724/PA approval 2019/01572/PA to No Objection Coldfield Birmingham install a window to the en-suite B75 5AG 52 Jordan Road Sutton Erection of a single storey front 2019/07308/PA Coldfield Birmingham No Objection extension B75 5AB Restoration of bakery and Support with Comment. 262 Lichfield Road replacement of single storey Committee are pleased 2019/07426/PA Four Oaks Sutton storage building with four storey to see the use of a Coldfield B74 2UH office retail buildings and vacant property. provision of parking spaces Prior Approval for proposed Barn at Springhill Farm change of use from agricultural 2019/07416/PA Camp Road Sutton building to 2 dwellings (Use Class No Objection Coldfield B75 5QY C3) and associated building operations 72 Sherifoot Lane Erection of single storey rear 2019/07139/PA Sutton Coldfield No Objection extension Birmingham B75 5DU Page | 4 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 8th October 2019 Unit 5a Mulberry Walk Formation of mezzanine floor to 2019/07100/PA Lichfield Road Sutton No Objection create first floor Coldfield B75 5BL Reddicap Ward 29th August- 2nd October 2019 Application Number Site Address Development Description SCTC Recommendation 4 Bowood End Sutton Erection of two storey and first 2019/07484/PA Coldfield Birmingham No Objection floor side extension B76 1LU 50 Rectory Park Erection of two storey side and Avenue Sutton 2019/07110/PA single storey forward and rear No Objection Coldfield Birmingham extensions B75 7BN Roughley Ward 29th August- 2nd October 2019 Application Number Site Address Development Description SCTC Recommendation Application to determine the 242 Slade Road Four details for condition numbers: 4 2019/07853/PA Oaks Sutton Coldfield (level details) attached to No Objection Birmingham B75 5PE planning approval 2019/05189/PA Non material amendment to Land adjacent 242 Planning Approval Slade Road Four Oaks 2019/07844/PA 2019/05189/PA for the addition No Objection Sutton Coldfield of two circular non-opening Birmingham B75 5PE obscure glazed loft windows Application to determine the details for condition numbers: 2 (sample materials), 5 (obscure Land adjacent 242 glazing for specific areas of the Slade Road Four Oaks approved building), 10 2019/07843/PA No Objection Sutton Coldfield (contamination remediation Birmingham B75 5PE scheme) and 11 (contaminated land verification report) attached to planning approval 2019/05189/PA 5 Moor Hall Drive 2019/07923/PA Sutton Coldfield Alterations of roof to rear. No Objection Birmingham B75 6LP Page | 5 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 8th October 2019 38 Grange Lane Sutton Erection of single storey side and 2019/07887/PA No Objection Coldfield Birmingham rear extensions 67 Harvest Fields Way Erection of single storey side and 2019/07684/PA Sutton Coldfield No Objection rear extensions Birmingham B75 5TH 29 Aulton Road Sutton 2019/07424/PA Installation of dormer to front No Objection Coldfield B75 5PX Trinity Ward 29th August- 2nd October 2019 Application Number Site Address Development Description SCTC Recommendation Listed Building Consent for 2 Coleshill Street change of use of existing offices 2019/07952/PA Sutton Coldfield (Use Class B1) to residential No Objection Birmingham B72 1XA dwelling (Use Class C3) including alterations to side elevation Change of use of existing offices 2 Coleshill Street (Use Class B1) to residential 2019/07919/PA Sutton Coldfield No Objection dwelling (Use Class C3) including Birmingham B72 1XA alterations to side elevation Objection. Members strongly object to this Telecoms Licence Advisory proposal. Committee application to replace 6 no.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Warding Arrangements for Legend Ladywood Ward
    Newtown Warding Arrangements for Soho & Jewellery Quarter Ladywood Ward Legend Nechells Authority boundary Final recommendation North Edgbaston Ladywood Bordesley & Highgate Edgbaston 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Balsall Heath West Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Bournville & Cotteridge Allens Cross Warding Arrangements for Longbridge & West Heath Ward Legend Frankley Great Park Northfield Authority boundary King's Norton North Final recommendation Longbridge & West Heath King's Norton South Rubery & Rednal 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Warding Arrangements for Lozells Ward Birchfield Legend Authority boundary Final recommendation Aston Handsworth Lozells Soho & Jewellery Quarter Newtown 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Small Heath Sparkbrook & Balsall Heath East Tyseley & Hay Mills Warding Balsall Heath West Arrangements for Moseley Ward Edgbaston Legend Authority boundary Final recommendation Sparkhill Moseley Bournbrook & Selly Park Hall Green North Brandwood & King's Heath Stirchley Billesley 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Kilometers Hall Green South Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Perry Barr Stockland Green Warding Pype Hayes Arrangements for Gravelly Hill Nechells Ward Aston Legend Authority boundary Final recommendation Bromford & Hodge Hill Lozells Ward End Nechells Newtown Alum Rock Glebe Farm & Tile Cross Soho & Jewellery Quarter Ladywood Heartlands Bordesley & Highgate 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Kilometers Bordesley Green Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Small Heath Handsworth Aston Warding Lozells Arrangements for Newtown Ward Legend Authority boundary Final recommendation Newtown Nechells Soho & Jewellery Quarter 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 Ladywood Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database Ladywood right 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The VLI Is a Composite Index Based on a Range Of
    OFFICIAL: This document should be used by members for partner agencies and police purposes only. If you wish to use any data from this document in external reports please request this through Birmingham Community Safety Partnership URN Date Issued CSP-SA-02 v3 11/02/2019 Customer/Issued To: Head of Community Safety, Birmingham Birmi ngham Community Safety Partnership Strategic Assessment 2019 The profile is produced and owned by West Midlands Police, and shared with our partners under statutory provisions to effectively prevent crime and disorder. The document is protectively marked at OFFICIAL but can be subject of disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or Criminal Procedures and Investigations Act 1996. There should be no unauthorised disclosure of this document outside of an agreed readership without reference to the author or the Director of Intelligence for WMP. Crown copyright © and database rights (2019) Ordnance Survey West Midlands Police licence number 100022494 2019. Reproduced by permission of Geographers' A-Z Map Co. Ltd. © Crown Copyright 2019. All rights reserved. Licence number 100017302. 1 Page OFFICIAL OFFICIAL: This document should be used by members for partner agencies and police purposes only. If you wish to use any data from this document in external reports please request this through Birmingham Community Safety Partnership Contents Key Findings .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Reducing
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Wards Where FPN's Are Issued Constituency Ward Apr May
    APPENDIX 1 Wards where FPN's are issued Constituency Ward Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total Edgbaston Bartley Green 0 0 0 0 Edgbaston 0 0 0 0 Harborne 0 0 0 0 Quinton 0 0 0 0 Erdington Erdington 0 1 0 1 Kingstanding 0 1 0 1 Stockland Green 0 0 2 2 Tyburn 0 1 1 2 Hall Green Hall Green 0 1 0 1 Moseley And Kings Heath 2 0 0 2 Sparkbrook 0 1 1 2 Springfield 0 0 0 0 Hodge Hill Bordesley Green 0 0 0 0 Hodge Hill 0 0 0 0 Shard End 1 4 0 5 Washwood Heath 1 0 0 1 Ladywood Aston 0 2 0 2 Ladywood 459 436 256 1,151 Nechells 5 3 0 8 Soho 5 1 0 6 Northfield Kings Norton 0 0 3 3 Longbridge 0 1 0 1 Northfield 2 0 0 2 Weoley 2 0 0 2 Perry Barr Handsworth Wood 0 0 1 1 Lozells And East Handsworth 0 1 1 2 Oscott 0 2 0 2 Perry Barr 1 0 1 2 Selly Oak Billesley 1 1 0 2 Bournville 0 0 1 1 Brandwood 0 0 0 0 Selly Oak 0 0 1 1 Sutton Coldfield Sutton Four Oaks 0 0 0 0 Sutton New Hall 0 0 0 0 Sutton Trinity 0 0 0 0 Sutton Vesey 0 0 0 0 Yardley Acocks Green 6 6 1 13 Sheldon 0 1 0 1 South Yardley 1 2 1 4 Stechford And Yardley North 1 0 0 1 Total 487 465 270 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,222 APPENDIX 2 WARD OF PERSON RECEIVING FIXED PENALTY NOTICES BY CONSTITUENCY/WARD It is not possible to provide this information currently and will be provided in the coming weeks Constituency Ward Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total Edgbaston BARTLEY GREEN 0 EDGBASTON 0 HARBORNE 0 QUINTON 0 Erdington ERDINGTON 0 KINGSTANDING 0 STOCKLAND GREEN 0 TYBURN 0 Hall Green HALL GREEN 0 MOSELEY AND KINGS HEATH 0 SPARKBROOK 0 SPRINGFIELD 0 Hodge Hill BORDESLEY GREEN
    [Show full text]
  • COVID Enforcement Patrols Regular Enforcement Patrols Are Undertaken to Ensure Businesses Are Complying with Coronavirus Legislation
    COVID Marshals • 25 COVID Marshals and 8 Park Marshals employed since November providing a hi-vis presence on the street. • Visiting all Wards but are particularly focusing on those with the highest infection rates. • Assisting with surge testing in Great Park and Frankley. • Providing advice to businesses on good practice and to citizens on the use of face coverings. • Eyes and ears for Enforcement Team providing valuable feedback on businesses who are not complying with the legislation so that enforcement work can be prioritised. • Large number of “free” face coverings are being distributed by the COVID Marshals on a daily basis. To date over 18,500 face coverings have been distributed. • Public interactions has now a last fallen considerably since the latest lockdown was introduced. (mid Jan-Feb) • Enclosed shopping centres found to have the highest level of non-compliance with regards to the wearing of face coverings. • Between the 16th Jan and 14th Feb the majority of face coverings (40% - 1,345) were distributed in the City Centre. • 446 masks were distributed by the Park COVID Marshals (13%). PA F 1 1 1 1 1 20 12 20 40 60 80 0 2 4 6 8 GE th 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ace J a 3 n – 14 Acocks Green th Fe Alum Rock b co ( e Aston x c lu Billesley d in v g Bordesley & Highgate L a erings d ywoo Bordesley Green Bournville & Cotteridge d ) Brandwood & King's Heath Bromford & Hodge Hill Castle Vale Erdington distri Frankley Great Park Gravelly Hill Hall Green North Hall Green South but Handsworth Handsworth Wood Harborne ed Holyhead King's Norton North b King's Norton South y w Kingstanding Longbridge & West Heath Lozells ar Moseley Newtown d b Northfield Perry Barr y CO Perry Common Pype Hayes Sheldon Small Heath VID Soho & Jewellery Quarter South Yardley Sparkbrook & Balsall Heath East Marshals Sparkhill Stirchley Sutton Four Oaks Sutton Mere Green Sutton Trinity Sutton Vesey Tyseley & Hay Mills Weoley & Selly Oak Yardley West & Stechford PA public No 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 12 50 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 GE th 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jan 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendationsанаwest Midlands Contents 1. Initial/Final
    Final recommendations ­ West Midlands Contents 1. Initial/final proposals overview p1 6. Sub­region 1: Coventry and Warwickshire p13, recommendations p15 2. Number of representations received p4 7. Sub­region 2: Solihull p16, recommendations p17 3. Campaigns p5 8. Sub­region 3: Herefordshire, Shropshire (including Telford and Wrekin), and Worcestershire: p17, recommendations p22; and West Midlands (less Coventry and Solihull) p23, recommendations p29 4. Major issues p6 9. Sub­region 4: Staffordshire and Stoke­on­Trent p30, recommendations p33 5. Final proposals recommendations p8 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The West Midlands region was allocated 53 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of six from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub­regions: Table 1A ­ Constituency allocation Sub­region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Staffordshire (and 12 11 11 Stoke­on­Trent) Herefordshire, Shropshire 47 42 n/a (including Telford and Wrekin), Warwickshire, West Midlands, and Worcestershire Herefordshire, Shropshire n/a n/a 32 (including Telford and Wrekin), West Midlands (excluding Coventry and 1 Solihull), and Worcestershire Coventry and Warwickshire n/a n/a 8 Solihull n/a n/a 2 2. Under the initial proposals seven of the existing 59 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals retained six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under the initial proposals there were four constituencies that crossed county boundaries. These were: one cross­county constituency between Worcestershire and Warwickshire (Evesham and South Warwickshire), one between Herefordshire and Shropshire (Ludlow and Leominster), one between Herefordshire and Worcestershire (Malvern and Ledbury), and one between West Midlands and Warwickshire (Shirley and Solihull South).
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Meetings and Ward Plans Update
    Date updated: 23.02.2021 Ward Meetings and Ward Plans Update 1. Ward Forum Meetings 1.1 Number of Virtual Meetings and Attendance (April 2020-March 2021) *Meeting arranged but not yet taken place **The NDSU YouTube Channel was set up in November 2020 (Q3) Year Meetings Total Average Number of Total Average (2020- that were YouTube YouTube Meetings Attendance Attendance 2021) joint Views** Views Q1 (Apr- 7 230 33 145 21 Jun) Q2 (Jul- 23 1 587 27 235 11 Sep) Q3 (Oct- 31 6 723 23 811 29 Dec) Q4 (Jan- 21 & 20* 1 & 4* 601 29 977 75 Mar) Grand 102 12 2,141 26 2,168 31 Total (82 & 20*) (8 & 4*) 1.2 Total Number of Meetings by Ward *Meeting arranged but not yet taken place ***Meeting arranged but not completed (technology error) April 2020- May 2018-April May 2019- Ward March 2021 2019 March 2020 (Virtual) Acocks Green 4 5 2 & 1* Allens Cross 2 1 1 Alum Rock 3 0 2 & 1* Aston 2 2 1 Balsall Heath West 3 5 1 & 1* Bartley Green 3 3 0 Billesley 1 1 1* Birchfield 5 4 2 & 1* Bordesley & Highgate 1 0 2 Bordesley Green 1 0 1* Bournbrook & Selly Park 3 1 2 Bournville & Cotteridge 3 3 2 & 1* Brandwood & Kings Heath 3 2 0 Bromford & Hodge Hill 5 2 6 Date updated: 23.02.2021 April 2020- May 2018-April May 2019- Ward March 2021 2019 March 2020 (Virtual) Castle Vale 2 0 0 Druids Heath & Monyhull 5 3 2 & 1* Edgbaston 2 3 0 Erdington 3 1 1 Frankley Great Park 2 1 2 Garretts Green 2 0 1 Glebe Farm & Tile Cross 6 2 1 Gravelly Hill 3 3 1 & 1* Hall Green North 4 4 2 & 1* Hall Green South 2 1 0 Handsworth 4 3 3 Handsworth Wood 4 3 1* Harborne 4 2 2*** & 1 Heartlands
    [Show full text]
  • Petitions Relating to City Council Functions Presented to City Council – 6 December 2016
    PETITIONS RELATING TO CITY COUNCIL FUNCTIONS PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL – 6 DECEMBER 2016 DATE OF DESCRIPTION /SENT TO RESPONSE RECEIPT/ PRESENTED BY CATEGORY 1783 From residents in the Northfield area calling upon the City Petition referred to Economy Directorate and response being 03.11.15 Council to introduce a 20 miles per hour speed limit on prepared by Transport and Connectivity 01.12.15 Councillor Randal roads bordering St Laurence Church Junior School, Response to be submitted for approval by Assistant Brew namely Bunbury Road, Innage Road, Dinmore Avenue Director/Cabinet Member. 01.03.16 EXEC and Heath Road South – Assistant Director Transportation A response is drafted and to be sent for approval by Cabinet and Connectivity Member shortly. 05.04.16 Draft response awaiting Cabinet Member approval. 24.05.16 Response agreed by Cabinet Member and letters sent to Councillor Brew and first-named petitioner. 06.12.16 Petition to be discharged 1822 From residents Weoley Ward objecting to Dennings Petition referred to District Engineer for investigation. 01.03.16 erecting bollards and/or displaying their stock to the full 24.05.16 Councillor Steve extent resulting in no access for vehicles and emergency A response has been drafted and is currently being Booton services at Beckbury Road – Strategic Director of reviewed. 12.07.16 EXEC Economy Draft response awaiting Cabinet Member approval. 13.09.16 Response awaiting Cabinet Member approval. 01.11.16 Response agreed by Cabinet Member and letters sent to Councillor Booton and first-named petitioner. 06.12.16 Petition to be discharged 1824 From residents of Lozells and East Handsworth Ward Petition referred to District Engineer for investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Years Sutton Coldfield District Performance Summary
    Early Years Sutton Coldfield District Performance Summary 1 Demographics Sutton Coldfield District has 5,182 children who are under 5 within it, 5.9% of the city total. This is unevenly spread across the wards (table 1) with Sutton Trinity ward containing the most. Sutton New Hall ward contains the least children under 5 in both the district and of all wards across the city. Table 1 – Children Under 5 Years Old (source BCC 2016) Children Ward Under 5 Sutton Four Oaks 1,348 Sutton New Hall 1,037 Sutton Trinity 1,494 Sutton Vesey 1,303 District 5,182 City 86,601 In terms of ethnicity, unlike the city as whole, BME groups make up a minority of children under 5 across the district, with all wards similar to the district rate. Sutton Vesey has the highest rate containing just over 25%. Table 2 – Ethnicity (source 2011 census) Ethnicity Ward Asian Black Mixed White Other No. BME % BME Sutton Four Oaks 134 29 83 1099 8 254 19% Sutton New Hall 125 27 64 948 13 229 19% Sutton Trinity 130 46 153 1095 6 335 23% Sutton Vesey 158 26 86 865 11 281 25% District 547 128 386 4007 38 1099 22% City 28846 8661 8790 32870 2734 49031 59.9% 2 Family Across the district as a whole, the number of vulnerable children under 5 is 52, just under 2.9% of the city total. Sutton Trinity ward has the highest number of vulnerable children with 22 (table 3). In terms of rate of vulnerable children Sutton Coldfield district has below city rates for vulnerable children who are under 5 years old, with all wards recording figures below the city average.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Police Freedom of Information NEIGHBOURHOOD
    West Midlands Police Freedom of Information NEIGHBOURHOOD CODES NEIGHBOURHOOD CODE NEIGHBOURHOOD SECTOR NPU NPU CODE BEDA Erdington Erdington Birmingham East BE BEDB Kingstanding Erdington Birmingham East BE BEDC Stockland Green Erdington Birmingham East BE BEDD Tyburn Erdington Birmingham East BE BEEA Hall Green Hall Green Birmingham East BE BEEB Moseley and Kings Heath Hall Green Birmingham East BE BEEC Sparkbrook Hall Green Birmingham East BE BEED Springfield Hall Green Birmingham East BE BEFA Bordesley Green Hodge Hill Birmingham East BE BEFB Hodge Hill Hodge Hill Birmingham East BE BEFC Shard End Hodge Hill Birmingham East BE BEFD Washwood Heath Hodge Hill Birmingham East BE BEGA Sutton Four Oaks Sutton Coldfield Birmingham East BE BEGB Sutton New Hall Sutton Coldfield Birmingham East BE BEGC Sutton Trinity Sutton Coldfield Birmingham East BE BEGD Sutton Vesey Sutton Coldfield Birmingham East BE BEHA Acocks Green Yardley Birmingham East BE BEHB Sheldon Yardley Birmingham East BE BEHC South Yardley Yardley Birmingham East BE BEHD Stechford and Yardley North Yardley Birmingham East BE BWFA Birmingham City Centre Birmingham City Centre Birmingham West BW BWFB Eastside Birmingham City Centre Birmingham West BW BWFC Southside Birmingham City Centre Birmingham West BW BWFD Westside Birmingham City Centre Birmingham West BW BWGA Bartley Green Edgbaston Birmingham West BW BWGB Edgbaston Edgbaston Birmingham West BW BWGC Harborne Edgbaston Birmingham West BW BWGD Quinton Edgbaston Birmingham West BW BWHA Aston Ladywood East Birmingham West
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Outcome Dashboards Birmingham and Constituency Level
    Educational Outcome Dashboards Birmingham and Constituency Level 2018 Examinations and Assessments (Revised) March 2019 Data and Intelligence Team Birmingham City Council [email protected] Primary Phase Covers Headline Measures for Early Years, Key stage 1 and Key stage 2 (revised) Constituency information relates to pupils living in the area at time of school census using their home postcode as reference. Postcodes matched to Ward and Constituency via: https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/geographicalproducts/postcodeproducts Coverage From May 2018 some wards cross constituency boundaries. For purely comparison purposes all wards have been matched to a single constituency based on the highest proportion of children. Ward coverage indicates the amount of children in the ward within the constituency. In the case of constituency, coverage indicates the proportion of it that is made up by the displayed wards. All figures represent all children living in indicated area. 2017 / 2018 Primary phase outcomes for children attending a state school in Birmingham EYFSP Key stage 1 Key stage 1 Key stage 1 Good Level of Development Reading at least expected Writing at least expected Maths at least expected National 72% 75% 70% 76% West Midlands 69% 74% 69% 75% Stat Neighbours 69% 75% 70% 76% Core Cities 68% 72% 66% 73% Birmingham 68% 73% 67% 73% Key stage 2 Key stage 2 Reading average progress Writing average progress Maths average progress Reading, Writing & Maths (EXS+) NationalNational National National 65% West MidlandsWest
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham City Council T: 0121 728 3870 | W: Becg.Com | E: [email protected]
    $KTOKPIJCOQHƂEG2 Snowhill, Birmingham, B4 6GA Birmingham City Council T: 0121 728 3870 | W: becg.com | E: [email protected] This map shows the political control of Birmingham City Council Birmingham City Councillors following the local elections on 3rd May 2018. Ward Name Councillor(s) Majority Ward Name Councillor(s) Majority It includes the new wards as a result of boundary changes, and the Sutton Acocks Green John O’Shea 512 Longbridge & West Heath Debbie Clancy 263 respective local councillors elected to each ward. Labour holds Mere Green Roger Harmer 336 Brett O’Reilly 62 Allens Cross Eddie Freeman 49 Lozells Waseem Zaffar 1326 overall control of the Council with a 33-seat majority. Moseley Sutton Alum Rock Mohammed Idrees 4614 Kerry Jenkins 912 Sutton Mariam Khan 4249 Martin Straker Welds 1620 All out elections will be held every four years with the next local Four Oaks Roughley Aston Muhammad Afzal 650 Nechells Tahir Ali 1073 elections set for May 2022. Nagina Kauser 1247 Newtown Ziaul Islam MBE 1009 Balsall Heath West Zhor Malik 1734 North Edgbaston Carl Rice 1600 Bartley Green Bruce Lines 1331 Sharon Thompson 1421 John Lines 1429 Political Control 0QTVJƂGNF Olly Armstrong 378 Sutton Billesley Philip Davis 500 Oscott Keith Linnecor 387 Sutton Reddicap Trinity Lucy Seymour-Smith 274 Barbara Dring 460 Mahmood Hussain 1688 Sutton Vesey $KTEJƂGNF Perry Barr Jon Hunt 1070 Bordesley & Highgate Yvonne Mosquito 1056 Morriam Jan 736 Bordesley Green Chauhdry Rashid JP 1124 Perry Common Bob Beauchamp 52 Bournbrook & Selly Park Brigid Jones
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham in the Metropolitan County of West Midlands
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 3 51 LOCAL G BOUNDARY COi&ilSSIOK FOH EUGLAiTD REPORT H 0.351 LOCA), UOVWulffiU'i' liOU:J]>.\HY COIiKL'iiilON F0i{ V-JG CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KCB Dl-PUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J H Rankin QC MEMBKHS Lady Bov/den Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry To the Rt Hon William Whitelew CH.,,MC.f KP.t Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS K)R THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM IN THE METROPOLITAN COUNTY OF WEST MIDLANDS 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the city of Birmingham in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 8 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Birmingham City Council, copies of which were circulated to the West Midlands County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned, and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.
    [Show full text]