DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 3Rd December 2019 Planning and Highways Meeting Tuesday 3Rd December 2019 Sutton Coldf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 3Rd December 2019 Planning and Highways Meeting Tuesday 3Rd December 2019 Sutton Coldf Planning and Highways Meeting Tuesday 3rd December 2019 Sutton Coldfield Town Hall 7pm Present Cllrs D. Allan, L. Allen, Briggs, Horrocks (Chairman), Jolley. In Attendance Olive O’Sullivan – Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Natalia Gorman – Senior Administrator. Cllr T Wood as a non-voting observer. There were four members of the public and no press present. Maureen Murphy, a resident of Walmley & Minworth ward ask if the Town Council would be willing to fund the installation of a pedestrian crossing on Walmley Ash Road. The Chairman advised the resident to make contact with her Birmingham City elected representatives in the first instance. Ms Murphy also highlighted an issue of rubbish not being collected in the Walmley and Minworth area. Cllr Briggs advised that he has reported this concern to Birmingham City Council. Chris Hurston, a resident of Trinity ward raised concerns over planning application 2019/08292/PA. Ms Hurston objects to this application on the following grounds: • The proposal design is excessive in mass and is out of keeping with the area • There will be a loss of privacy to neighboring private gardens • There are concerns there will be an impact on daylight for neighboring properties • The resident expressed concerns that there is a highways impact which may force cars at the property to use private residents driveways The Chairman advised that the Planning & Highways Committee of Royal Sutton Coldfield Town Council acts as a statutory consultee on Planning matters and that it is not a decision making body. Cllr Horrocks advised residents to make their concerns on this application known to Birmingham City Council. 50 Apologies for Absence The CEO received apologies from Cllrs Hodgins, Puri & Simper. Resolved to accept the apologies received. 51 Declarations of Interest Cllr Wood declared an interest in planning application 2019/02929/PA given the proximity of the proposed development to where he lives. 52 Minutes of Last Meeting Page | 1 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 3rd December 2019 Resolved that the minutes of the meeting of Planning & Highways Committee Meeting held on Tuesday 12th November 2019 be signed as a true record of the meeting. 53 Matters Arising The CEO reported that a resident contacted her requesting clarification on amendments Planning & Highways Committee agreed to their Committee Budget 2020/21, discussed under agenda item 47 of the 12th November 2019 meeting. The CEO confirmed that: Signage replacement was reduced from £10,000 to £5,000 Cleaning improvement was reduced from £100,000 to £75,000 Traffic Island Improvement reduced rom £25,000 to £20,000 These reductions were made due to the current level of earmarked reserves and unspent budget from 2019/20 which would be added into the earmarked reserves at the end of the financial year. The suggested budget for 2020/21 is a more realistic figure. The Historical Memorials budget was increased from £25,000 to £60,000 to allow for additional expenditure for the planned improvements for the Walmley war memorial. Resolved to note the CEO’s update 54 Planning Applications Four Oaks Ward 7th - 27th November 2019 Application SCTC Number Site Address Development Description Recommendation 79 Belwell Lane Sutton Erection of single storey 2019/09622/PA Coldfield Birmingham No Objection side extension B74 4TS Application for a non- material amendment to planning approval 2019/01347/PA 17 The Moorlands alterations to rear gable to 2019/09455/PA Sutton Coldfield B74 include more glazing, No Objection 2RF alterations to window to create stone heads and cills and slate cladding and render to front and rear elevation. 24 Wyvern Road Sutton Erection of single storey 2019/09362/PA Coldfield Birmingham No Objection rear extension B74 2PT Page | 2 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 3rd December 2019 41 Park View Road Four Erection of single storey 2019/09336/PA Oaks Sutton Coldfield No Objection rear extension B74 4PR Application to determine the details for Condition 21 Clarry Drive Sutton Nos. 3 (sample materials), 2019/09138/PA Coldfield Birmingham 5 (hard/soft landscaping) No Objection B74 2QT and 8 (hard surfacing materials) attached to approval 2016/08963/PA Application to determine the details for Condition 14 Belwell Lane Sutton Nos. 2 (acoustic 2019/09238/PA Coldfield Birmingham No Objection protection) and 3 (noise B74 4AL study) attached to approval 2016/08004/PA Change of use at first floor 14 Belwell Lane Sutton from 2 no. self-contained 2019/09237/PA Coldfield Birmingham No Objection flats to 3 no. self- B74 4AL contained flats Application to determine the details for condition 207 Walsall Road Four number 2 (sample 2019/09236/PA Oaks Sutton Coldfield No Objection materials) attached to Birmingham B74 4QA planning approval 2018/00299/PA 365 Clarence Road Four Erection of two storey side 2019/09161/PA Oaks Sutton Coldfield and forward extension No Objection B74 4LX (amended description). Erection of first floor side, two storey and single storey rear extensions, 15 Crown Lane Sutton two storey forward 2019/09080/PA Coldfield Birmingham extensions, dormer No Objection B74 4SU window to front and installation of porch to front (AMENDED DESCRIPTION). Mere Green Ward 7th - 27th November 2019 Application SCTC Number Site Address Development Description Recommendation Page | 3 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 3rd December 2019 489 Lichfield Road Sutton Four Oaks Erection of two storey side 2019/09626/PA No Objection Sutton Coldfield B74 and rear extension 4DL 88 Hill Village Road Erection of single storey 2019/09497/PA Sutton Coldfield No Objection rear extension Birmingham B75 5BE 39 Sara Close Four Oaks Erection of single storey 2019/09300/PA No Objection Birmingham B74 4BW side and rear extensions Erection of two storey and 10 Bradgate Drive first floor front extension 2019/09172/PA Sutton Coldfield B74 and roof alterations to No Objection 4XG front (amended description). Support with comment. Committee note that the storage container will Marks & Spencer 304 Siting of 1 no. refrigerated occupy 50% of the Lichfield Road Mere storage container between 2019/09115/PA loading bay. Green Sutton Coldfield 01 November to 31 Members would like Birmingham B74 2UG January annually to be assured that there will be no impact on traffic to accommodate this proposal Reddicap Ward 7th - 27th November 2019 Application SCTC Number Site Address Development Description Recommendation Erection of single storey 46 Walsh Drive Sutton rear,front and side 2019/09527/PA No Objection Coldfield B76 2NU extensions and erection of forward porch extension Objection. The 5 Hollyfield Drive Sutton Erection of first floor side proposal is out of 2019/09146/PA Coldfield Birmingham B75 extension keeping with the 7SF current street scene. 6 Rectory Park Close Erection of first floor side 2019/09026/PA Sutton Coldfield extension and installation of No Objection Birmingham B75 7BW dormer window to rear Page | 4 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 3rd December 2019 Application for Prior Notification for alteration to WPD Sutton Coldfield existing electronic Primary Grid Sub-Station communications station with 2019/09123/PA Coleshill Road Sutton a 10m extension to existing No Objection Coldfield Birmingham B75 slimline lattice tower from 7BA 15m to 25m above ground level and ancillary development 80 Walsh Drive Sutton Erection of single storey side 2019/09088/PA Coldfield Birmingham B76 No Objection and rear extension 2NU Application to determine the details of condition number 5 2 Forest Park Sutton (Arboricultural Method 2019/09081/PA Coldfield Birmingham B76 No Objection Statement) attached to 1FD planning approval 2018/0161/pa. Erection of first floor 18 Seal Close Sutton side/rear extension with 2019/08703/PA Coldfield Birmingham B76 No Objection Juliet balcony to rear and 1FJ single storey side extension. Roughley Ward 7th - 27th November 2019 Application SCTC Number Site Address Development Description Recommendation Objection. Land at Worcester Committee are Lane Between The Erection of 2 no. disappointed to see Bungalow and 2019/09072/PA dwellinghouses with loss of green space Berachah Sutton associated works Coldfield Birmingham and feel that this B75 5QR proposal is infill development. Trinity Ward 7th - 27th November 2019 Application SCTC Number Site Address Development Description Recommendation 2 Somerville Drive Erection of two storey rear 2019/09671/PA Sutton Coldfield B73 No Objection and front extension 6JB Page | 5 Planning and Highways Minutes | Tuesday 3rd December 2019 Whilst Committee understands that the re-development of this site for residential purposes Land to the rear of 2 - 8 Erection of four storey close to the town High Street Sutton building to provide 9 no. 2019/08292/PA centre generally Coldfield Birmingham apartments and associated accords with the B72 1SH parking and infrastructure adopted planning policies, Members object to this application on the following grounds: The scale and mass represent overdevelopment of the site. Whilst design solutions are claimed to have been incorporated to reduce the impact of any overlooking, Committee notes that the separation distances between the new building and Tudor Court are well below those normally applied. Committee are concerned that the development will have an overbearing impact upon residents of Tudor Court which would be detrimental to their residential amenity. Committee feel that the proposal is out of keeping with the current area in terms of sheer mass of the building and particularly the proposal of a flat roof Members are concerned that both in terms of quantum and functionality the four car parking spaces proposed are inadequate to meet the needs for nine apartments and visitors to the site. Also, manoeuvring directly onto Midland Drive could cause difficulties given the lack of any on site turning facility. There are concerns over the application description 'Erection of four storey building' whilst the site plans show this to be a five-story building. Committee request further clarification on this.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Warding Arrangements for Legend Ladywood Ward
    Newtown Warding Arrangements for Soho & Jewellery Quarter Ladywood Ward Legend Nechells Authority boundary Final recommendation North Edgbaston Ladywood Bordesley & Highgate Edgbaston 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Balsall Heath West Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Bournville & Cotteridge Allens Cross Warding Arrangements for Longbridge & West Heath Ward Legend Frankley Great Park Northfield Authority boundary King's Norton North Final recommendation Longbridge & West Heath King's Norton South Rubery & Rednal 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Warding Arrangements for Lozells Ward Birchfield Legend Authority boundary Final recommendation Aston Handsworth Lozells Soho & Jewellery Quarter Newtown 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Small Heath Sparkbrook & Balsall Heath East Tyseley & Hay Mills Warding Balsall Heath West Arrangements for Moseley Ward Edgbaston Legend Authority boundary Final recommendation Sparkhill Moseley Bournbrook & Selly Park Hall Green North Brandwood & King's Heath Stirchley Billesley 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Kilometers Hall Green South Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Perry Barr Stockland Green Warding Pype Hayes Arrangements for Gravelly Hill Nechells Ward Aston Legend Authority boundary Final recommendation Bromford & Hodge Hill Lozells Ward End Nechells Newtown Alum Rock Glebe Farm & Tile Cross Soho & Jewellery Quarter Ladywood Heartlands Bordesley & Highgate 0 0.15 0.3 0.6 Kilometers Bordesley Green Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016. $ Small Heath Handsworth Aston Warding Lozells Arrangements for Newtown Ward Legend Authority boundary Final recommendation Newtown Nechells Soho & Jewellery Quarter 0 0.075 0.15 0.3 Ladywood Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database Ladywood right 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • The VLI Is a Composite Index Based on a Range Of
    OFFICIAL: This document should be used by members for partner agencies and police purposes only. If you wish to use any data from this document in external reports please request this through Birmingham Community Safety Partnership URN Date Issued CSP-SA-02 v3 11/02/2019 Customer/Issued To: Head of Community Safety, Birmingham Birmi ngham Community Safety Partnership Strategic Assessment 2019 The profile is produced and owned by West Midlands Police, and shared with our partners under statutory provisions to effectively prevent crime and disorder. The document is protectively marked at OFFICIAL but can be subject of disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or Criminal Procedures and Investigations Act 1996. There should be no unauthorised disclosure of this document outside of an agreed readership without reference to the author or the Director of Intelligence for WMP. Crown copyright © and database rights (2019) Ordnance Survey West Midlands Police licence number 100022494 2019. Reproduced by permission of Geographers' A-Z Map Co. Ltd. © Crown Copyright 2019. All rights reserved. Licence number 100017302. 1 Page OFFICIAL OFFICIAL: This document should be used by members for partner agencies and police purposes only. If you wish to use any data from this document in external reports please request this through Birmingham Community Safety Partnership Contents Key Findings .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Reducing
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Wards Where FPN's Are Issued Constituency Ward Apr May
    APPENDIX 1 Wards where FPN's are issued Constituency Ward Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total Edgbaston Bartley Green 0 0 0 0 Edgbaston 0 0 0 0 Harborne 0 0 0 0 Quinton 0 0 0 0 Erdington Erdington 0 1 0 1 Kingstanding 0 1 0 1 Stockland Green 0 0 2 2 Tyburn 0 1 1 2 Hall Green Hall Green 0 1 0 1 Moseley And Kings Heath 2 0 0 2 Sparkbrook 0 1 1 2 Springfield 0 0 0 0 Hodge Hill Bordesley Green 0 0 0 0 Hodge Hill 0 0 0 0 Shard End 1 4 0 5 Washwood Heath 1 0 0 1 Ladywood Aston 0 2 0 2 Ladywood 459 436 256 1,151 Nechells 5 3 0 8 Soho 5 1 0 6 Northfield Kings Norton 0 0 3 3 Longbridge 0 1 0 1 Northfield 2 0 0 2 Weoley 2 0 0 2 Perry Barr Handsworth Wood 0 0 1 1 Lozells And East Handsworth 0 1 1 2 Oscott 0 2 0 2 Perry Barr 1 0 1 2 Selly Oak Billesley 1 1 0 2 Bournville 0 0 1 1 Brandwood 0 0 0 0 Selly Oak 0 0 1 1 Sutton Coldfield Sutton Four Oaks 0 0 0 0 Sutton New Hall 0 0 0 0 Sutton Trinity 0 0 0 0 Sutton Vesey 0 0 0 0 Yardley Acocks Green 6 6 1 13 Sheldon 0 1 0 1 South Yardley 1 2 1 4 Stechford And Yardley North 1 0 0 1 Total 487 465 270 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,222 APPENDIX 2 WARD OF PERSON RECEIVING FIXED PENALTY NOTICES BY CONSTITUENCY/WARD It is not possible to provide this information currently and will be provided in the coming weeks Constituency Ward Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Total Edgbaston BARTLEY GREEN 0 EDGBASTON 0 HARBORNE 0 QUINTON 0 Erdington ERDINGTON 0 KINGSTANDING 0 STOCKLAND GREEN 0 TYBURN 0 Hall Green HALL GREEN 0 MOSELEY AND KINGS HEATH 0 SPARKBROOK 0 SPRINGFIELD 0 Hodge Hill BORDESLEY GREEN
    [Show full text]
  • COVID Enforcement Patrols Regular Enforcement Patrols Are Undertaken to Ensure Businesses Are Complying with Coronavirus Legislation
    COVID Marshals • 25 COVID Marshals and 8 Park Marshals employed since November providing a hi-vis presence on the street. • Visiting all Wards but are particularly focusing on those with the highest infection rates. • Assisting with surge testing in Great Park and Frankley. • Providing advice to businesses on good practice and to citizens on the use of face coverings. • Eyes and ears for Enforcement Team providing valuable feedback on businesses who are not complying with the legislation so that enforcement work can be prioritised. • Large number of “free” face coverings are being distributed by the COVID Marshals on a daily basis. To date over 18,500 face coverings have been distributed. • Public interactions has now a last fallen considerably since the latest lockdown was introduced. (mid Jan-Feb) • Enclosed shopping centres found to have the highest level of non-compliance with regards to the wearing of face coverings. • Between the 16th Jan and 14th Feb the majority of face coverings (40% - 1,345) were distributed in the City Centre. • 446 masks were distributed by the Park COVID Marshals (13%). PA F 1 1 1 1 1 20 12 20 40 60 80 0 2 4 6 8 GE th 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ace J a 3 n – 14 Acocks Green th Fe Alum Rock b co ( e Aston x c lu Billesley d in v g Bordesley & Highgate L a erings d ywoo Bordesley Green Bournville & Cotteridge d ) Brandwood & King's Heath Bromford & Hodge Hill Castle Vale Erdington distri Frankley Great Park Gravelly Hill Hall Green North Hall Green South but Handsworth Handsworth Wood Harborne ed Holyhead King's Norton North b King's Norton South y w Kingstanding Longbridge & West Heath Lozells ar Moseley Newtown d b Northfield Perry Barr y CO Perry Common Pype Hayes Sheldon Small Heath VID Soho & Jewellery Quarter South Yardley Sparkbrook & Balsall Heath East Marshals Sparkhill Stirchley Sutton Four Oaks Sutton Mere Green Sutton Trinity Sutton Vesey Tyseley & Hay Mills Weoley & Selly Oak Yardley West & Stechford PA public No 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 12 50 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 GE th 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jan 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendationsанаwest Midlands Contents 1. Initial/Final
    Final recommendations ­ West Midlands Contents 1. Initial/final proposals overview p1 6. Sub­region 1: Coventry and Warwickshire p13, recommendations p15 2. Number of representations received p4 7. Sub­region 2: Solihull p16, recommendations p17 3. Campaigns p5 8. Sub­region 3: Herefordshire, Shropshire (including Telford and Wrekin), and Worcestershire: p17, recommendations p22; and West Midlands (less Coventry and Solihull) p23, recommendations p29 4. Major issues p6 9. Sub­region 4: Staffordshire and Stoke­on­Trent p30, recommendations p33 5. Final proposals recommendations p8 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The West Midlands region was allocated 53 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of six from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub­regions: Table 1A ­ Constituency allocation Sub­region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Staffordshire (and 12 11 11 Stoke­on­Trent) Herefordshire, Shropshire 47 42 n/a (including Telford and Wrekin), Warwickshire, West Midlands, and Worcestershire Herefordshire, Shropshire n/a n/a 32 (including Telford and Wrekin), West Midlands (excluding Coventry and 1 Solihull), and Worcestershire Coventry and Warwickshire n/a n/a 8 Solihull n/a n/a 2 2. Under the initial proposals seven of the existing 59 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals retained six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under the initial proposals there were four constituencies that crossed county boundaries. These were: one cross­county constituency between Worcestershire and Warwickshire (Evesham and South Warwickshire), one between Herefordshire and Shropshire (Ludlow and Leominster), one between Herefordshire and Worcestershire (Malvern and Ledbury), and one between West Midlands and Warwickshire (Shirley and Solihull South).
    [Show full text]
  • Ward Meetings and Ward Plans Update
    Date updated: 23.02.2021 Ward Meetings and Ward Plans Update 1. Ward Forum Meetings 1.1 Number of Virtual Meetings and Attendance (April 2020-March 2021) *Meeting arranged but not yet taken place **The NDSU YouTube Channel was set up in November 2020 (Q3) Year Meetings Total Average Number of Total Average (2020- that were YouTube YouTube Meetings Attendance Attendance 2021) joint Views** Views Q1 (Apr- 7 230 33 145 21 Jun) Q2 (Jul- 23 1 587 27 235 11 Sep) Q3 (Oct- 31 6 723 23 811 29 Dec) Q4 (Jan- 21 & 20* 1 & 4* 601 29 977 75 Mar) Grand 102 12 2,141 26 2,168 31 Total (82 & 20*) (8 & 4*) 1.2 Total Number of Meetings by Ward *Meeting arranged but not yet taken place ***Meeting arranged but not completed (technology error) April 2020- May 2018-April May 2019- Ward March 2021 2019 March 2020 (Virtual) Acocks Green 4 5 2 & 1* Allens Cross 2 1 1 Alum Rock 3 0 2 & 1* Aston 2 2 1 Balsall Heath West 3 5 1 & 1* Bartley Green 3 3 0 Billesley 1 1 1* Birchfield 5 4 2 & 1* Bordesley & Highgate 1 0 2 Bordesley Green 1 0 1* Bournbrook & Selly Park 3 1 2 Bournville & Cotteridge 3 3 2 & 1* Brandwood & Kings Heath 3 2 0 Bromford & Hodge Hill 5 2 6 Date updated: 23.02.2021 April 2020- May 2018-April May 2019- Ward March 2021 2019 March 2020 (Virtual) Castle Vale 2 0 0 Druids Heath & Monyhull 5 3 2 & 1* Edgbaston 2 3 0 Erdington 3 1 1 Frankley Great Park 2 1 2 Garretts Green 2 0 1 Glebe Farm & Tile Cross 6 2 1 Gravelly Hill 3 3 1 & 1* Hall Green North 4 4 2 & 1* Hall Green South 2 1 0 Handsworth 4 3 3 Handsworth Wood 4 3 1* Harborne 4 2 2*** & 1 Heartlands
    [Show full text]
  • Petitions Relating to City Council Functions Presented to City Council – 6 December 2016
    PETITIONS RELATING TO CITY COUNCIL FUNCTIONS PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL – 6 DECEMBER 2016 DATE OF DESCRIPTION /SENT TO RESPONSE RECEIPT/ PRESENTED BY CATEGORY 1783 From residents in the Northfield area calling upon the City Petition referred to Economy Directorate and response being 03.11.15 Council to introduce a 20 miles per hour speed limit on prepared by Transport and Connectivity 01.12.15 Councillor Randal roads bordering St Laurence Church Junior School, Response to be submitted for approval by Assistant Brew namely Bunbury Road, Innage Road, Dinmore Avenue Director/Cabinet Member. 01.03.16 EXEC and Heath Road South – Assistant Director Transportation A response is drafted and to be sent for approval by Cabinet and Connectivity Member shortly. 05.04.16 Draft response awaiting Cabinet Member approval. 24.05.16 Response agreed by Cabinet Member and letters sent to Councillor Brew and first-named petitioner. 06.12.16 Petition to be discharged 1822 From residents Weoley Ward objecting to Dennings Petition referred to District Engineer for investigation. 01.03.16 erecting bollards and/or displaying their stock to the full 24.05.16 Councillor Steve extent resulting in no access for vehicles and emergency A response has been drafted and is currently being Booton services at Beckbury Road – Strategic Director of reviewed. 12.07.16 EXEC Economy Draft response awaiting Cabinet Member approval. 13.09.16 Response awaiting Cabinet Member approval. 01.11.16 Response agreed by Cabinet Member and letters sent to Councillor Booton and first-named petitioner. 06.12.16 Petition to be discharged 1824 From residents of Lozells and East Handsworth Ward Petition referred to District Engineer for investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Years Sutton Coldfield District Performance Summary
    Early Years Sutton Coldfield District Performance Summary 1 Demographics Sutton Coldfield District has 5,182 children who are under 5 within it, 5.9% of the city total. This is unevenly spread across the wards (table 1) with Sutton Trinity ward containing the most. Sutton New Hall ward contains the least children under 5 in both the district and of all wards across the city. Table 1 – Children Under 5 Years Old (source BCC 2016) Children Ward Under 5 Sutton Four Oaks 1,348 Sutton New Hall 1,037 Sutton Trinity 1,494 Sutton Vesey 1,303 District 5,182 City 86,601 In terms of ethnicity, unlike the city as whole, BME groups make up a minority of children under 5 across the district, with all wards similar to the district rate. Sutton Vesey has the highest rate containing just over 25%. Table 2 – Ethnicity (source 2011 census) Ethnicity Ward Asian Black Mixed White Other No. BME % BME Sutton Four Oaks 134 29 83 1099 8 254 19% Sutton New Hall 125 27 64 948 13 229 19% Sutton Trinity 130 46 153 1095 6 335 23% Sutton Vesey 158 26 86 865 11 281 25% District 547 128 386 4007 38 1099 22% City 28846 8661 8790 32870 2734 49031 59.9% 2 Family Across the district as a whole, the number of vulnerable children under 5 is 52, just under 2.9% of the city total. Sutton Trinity ward has the highest number of vulnerable children with 22 (table 3). In terms of rate of vulnerable children Sutton Coldfield district has below city rates for vulnerable children who are under 5 years old, with all wards recording figures below the city average.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands Police Freedom of Information NEIGHBOURHOOD
    West Midlands Police Freedom of Information NEIGHBOURHOOD CODES NEIGHBOURHOOD CODE NEIGHBOURHOOD SECTOR NPU NPU CODE BEDA Erdington Erdington Birmingham East BE BEDB Kingstanding Erdington Birmingham East BE BEDC Stockland Green Erdington Birmingham East BE BEDD Tyburn Erdington Birmingham East BE BEEA Hall Green Hall Green Birmingham East BE BEEB Moseley and Kings Heath Hall Green Birmingham East BE BEEC Sparkbrook Hall Green Birmingham East BE BEED Springfield Hall Green Birmingham East BE BEFA Bordesley Green Hodge Hill Birmingham East BE BEFB Hodge Hill Hodge Hill Birmingham East BE BEFC Shard End Hodge Hill Birmingham East BE BEFD Washwood Heath Hodge Hill Birmingham East BE BEGA Sutton Four Oaks Sutton Coldfield Birmingham East BE BEGB Sutton New Hall Sutton Coldfield Birmingham East BE BEGC Sutton Trinity Sutton Coldfield Birmingham East BE BEGD Sutton Vesey Sutton Coldfield Birmingham East BE BEHA Acocks Green Yardley Birmingham East BE BEHB Sheldon Yardley Birmingham East BE BEHC South Yardley Yardley Birmingham East BE BEHD Stechford and Yardley North Yardley Birmingham East BE BWFA Birmingham City Centre Birmingham City Centre Birmingham West BW BWFB Eastside Birmingham City Centre Birmingham West BW BWFC Southside Birmingham City Centre Birmingham West BW BWFD Westside Birmingham City Centre Birmingham West BW BWGA Bartley Green Edgbaston Birmingham West BW BWGB Edgbaston Edgbaston Birmingham West BW BWGC Harborne Edgbaston Birmingham West BW BWGD Quinton Edgbaston Birmingham West BW BWHA Aston Ladywood East Birmingham West
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Outcome Dashboards Birmingham and Constituency Level
    Educational Outcome Dashboards Birmingham and Constituency Level 2018 Examinations and Assessments (Revised) March 2019 Data and Intelligence Team Birmingham City Council [email protected] Primary Phase Covers Headline Measures for Early Years, Key stage 1 and Key stage 2 (revised) Constituency information relates to pupils living in the area at time of school census using their home postcode as reference. Postcodes matched to Ward and Constituency via: https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/geographicalproducts/postcodeproducts Coverage From May 2018 some wards cross constituency boundaries. For purely comparison purposes all wards have been matched to a single constituency based on the highest proportion of children. Ward coverage indicates the amount of children in the ward within the constituency. In the case of constituency, coverage indicates the proportion of it that is made up by the displayed wards. All figures represent all children living in indicated area. 2017 / 2018 Primary phase outcomes for children attending a state school in Birmingham EYFSP Key stage 1 Key stage 1 Key stage 1 Good Level of Development Reading at least expected Writing at least expected Maths at least expected National 72% 75% 70% 76% West Midlands 69% 74% 69% 75% Stat Neighbours 69% 75% 70% 76% Core Cities 68% 72% 66% 73% Birmingham 68% 73% 67% 73% Key stage 2 Key stage 2 Reading average progress Writing average progress Maths average progress Reading, Writing & Maths (EXS+) NationalNational National National 65% West MidlandsWest
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham City Council T: 0121 728 3870 | W: Becg.Com | E: [email protected]
    $KTOKPIJCOQHƂEG2 Snowhill, Birmingham, B4 6GA Birmingham City Council T: 0121 728 3870 | W: becg.com | E: [email protected] This map shows the political control of Birmingham City Council Birmingham City Councillors following the local elections on 3rd May 2018. Ward Name Councillor(s) Majority Ward Name Councillor(s) Majority It includes the new wards as a result of boundary changes, and the Sutton Acocks Green John O’Shea 512 Longbridge & West Heath Debbie Clancy 263 respective local councillors elected to each ward. Labour holds Mere Green Roger Harmer 336 Brett O’Reilly 62 Allens Cross Eddie Freeman 49 Lozells Waseem Zaffar 1326 overall control of the Council with a 33-seat majority. Moseley Sutton Alum Rock Mohammed Idrees 4614 Kerry Jenkins 912 Sutton Mariam Khan 4249 Martin Straker Welds 1620 All out elections will be held every four years with the next local Four Oaks Roughley Aston Muhammad Afzal 650 Nechells Tahir Ali 1073 elections set for May 2022. Nagina Kauser 1247 Newtown Ziaul Islam MBE 1009 Balsall Heath West Zhor Malik 1734 North Edgbaston Carl Rice 1600 Bartley Green Bruce Lines 1331 Sharon Thompson 1421 John Lines 1429 Political Control 0QTVJƂGNF Olly Armstrong 378 Sutton Billesley Philip Davis 500 Oscott Keith Linnecor 387 Sutton Reddicap Trinity Lucy Seymour-Smith 274 Barbara Dring 460 Mahmood Hussain 1688 Sutton Vesey $KTEJƂGNF Perry Barr Jon Hunt 1070 Bordesley & Highgate Yvonne Mosquito 1056 Morriam Jan 736 Bordesley Green Chauhdry Rashid JP 1124 Perry Common Bob Beauchamp 52 Bournbrook & Selly Park Brigid Jones
    [Show full text]
  • Birmingham in the Metropolitan County of West Midlands
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 3 51 LOCAL G BOUNDARY COi&ilSSIOK FOH EUGLAiTD REPORT H 0.351 LOCA), UOVWulffiU'i' liOU:J]>.\HY COIiKL'iiilON F0i{ V-JG CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KCB Dl-PUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J H Rankin QC MEMBKHS Lady Bov/den Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry To the Rt Hon William Whitelew CH.,,MC.f KP.t Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS K)R THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM IN THE METROPOLITAN COUNTY OF WEST MIDLANDS 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the city of Birmingham in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 8 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Birmingham City Council, copies of which were circulated to the West Midlands County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned, and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.
    [Show full text]