DOCSLIB.ORG

Text of the Main Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Text of the Main Document ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T C R E A STATE OF MICHIGAN S P E DNR D M ICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SR46 October 2008 Ontonagon River Assessment Brian J. Gunderman and Edward A. Baker www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT 46 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Special Report 46 October 2008 Ontonagon River Assessment Brian J. Gunderman and Edward A. Baker MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) MISSION STATEMENT “The Michigan Department of Natural Resources is committed to the conservation, protection, management, use and enjoyment of the State’s natural resources for current and future generations.” NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION (NRC) STATEMENT The Natural Resources Commission, as the governing body for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, provides a strategic framework for the DNR to effectively manage your resources. The NRC holds monthly, public meetings throughout Michigan, working closely with its constituencies in establishing and improving natural resources management policy. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES NON DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 as amended (MI PA 453 and MI PA 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write: HUMAN RESOURCES Or MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS Or OFFICE FOR DIVERSITY AND CIVIL RIGHTS MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CADILLAC PLACE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PO BOX 30028 3054 W. GRAND BLVD., SUITE 3-600 4040 NORTH FAIRFAX DRIVE LANSING MI 48909-7528 DETROIT MI 48202 ARLINGTON VA 22203 For information or assistance on this publication, contact the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Fisheries Division, PO BOX 30446, LANSING, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. TTY/TDD: 711 (Michigan Relay Center) This information is available in alternative formats. ATUR F N AL O R T E N S E O U M R T Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources C R E A S P E DNR D Total number of copies printed 40 — Total cost $1,769.56 — Cost per copy $44.24 M ICHIGAN Ontonagon River Assessment Suggested Citation Format Gunderman, B.J., and E.A. Baker. 2008. Ontonagon River assessment. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 46, Ann Arbor. ii Ontonagon River Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................vii LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................ix LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...........................................................................................xii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... xiii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 RIVER ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 4 Geography ........................................................................................................................... 4 Middle Branch—upper .................................................................................................. 5 Middle Branch—lower ................................................................................................... 5 Main Stem ..................................................................................................................... 5 East Branch................................................................................................................... 5 Cisco Branch................................................................................................................. 5 South Branch ................................................................................................................ 6 West Branch.................................................................................................................. 6 History.................................................................................................................................. 6 Geology ............................................................................................................................. 12 Surface Geology............................................................................................................. 12 Middle Branch—upper ................................................................................................ 13 Middle Branch—lower ................................................................................................. 13 Main Stem ................................................................................................................... 13 East Branch................................................................................................................. 13 Cisco Branch............................................................................................................... 13 South Branch .............................................................................................................. 14 West Branch................................................................................................................ 14 Bedrock Geology............................................................................................................ 14 Hydrology........................................................................................................................... 14 Climate ........................................................................................................................... 15 Annual Stream Flows ..................................................................................................... 15 Seasonal Stream Flows.................................................................................................. 16 Daily Stream Flows......................................................................................................... 17 Flooding and Floodplains ............................................................................................... 18 Soils and Land Use............................................................................................................ 19 Soils................................................................................................................................ 19 Land Use ........................................................................................................................19 Bridges and Other Stream Crossings............................................................................. 20 Channel Morphology.......................................................................................................... 21 Gradient.......................................................................................................................... 21 Specific Power................................................................................................................ 22 Middle Branch—upper ................................................................................................ 23 Middle Branch—lower ................................................................................................. 23 iii Ontonagon River Assessment Main Stem................................................................................................................... 23 East Branch................................................................................................................. 23 Cisco Branch............................................................................................................... 24 South Branch .............................................................................................................. 24 West Branch................................................................................................................ 24 Channel Cross Section................................................................................................... 25 Dams and Barriers............................................................................................................. 25 Middle Branch—upper ................................................................................................ 27 Middle Branch – lower................................................................................................. 28 Main Stem................................................................................................................... 29 East Branch................................................................................................................. 30 Cisco Branch..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michigan Technological University Archives' Postcard Collection MTU-196
    Michigan Technological University Archives' Postcard Collection MTU-196 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on February 08, 2019. Description is in English Michigan Technological University Archives and Copper Country Historical Collections 1400 Townsend Drive Houghton 49931 [email protected] URL: http://www.lib.mtu.edu/mtuarchives/ Michigan Technological University Archives' Postcard Collection MTU-196 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Biography ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Collection Scope and Content Summary ....................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 4 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 5 A ................................................................................................................................................................... 5 B ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Additional Information on Fishing on the Ottawa National Forest
    HERE ARE SOME BAITS YOU MIGHT WANT TO TRY: Walleye - live leeches fished on slip-sinker jigs; crawlers on crawler ‘harnesses’ work well, too. Smallmouth Bass - twisted tail jigs bounced over rocky drop-offs. Ottawa Nation Forest | July 2021 Largemouth Bass - surface plugs, or poppers on warm, calm, summer days. Northern Pike—bronze and red-white spoons. Muskellunge - surface plugs. FISHING ON THE OTTAWA Crappie - tiny minnows on tiny non-lead head feathered jigs. Yellow Perch & Bluegill - tiny feathered jigs with red worm. Lake Trout - light-weight spoons (trolled). Brook Trout - try spinners, or flies for the skilled fly caster. Over 500 named lakes and nearly 2,000 miles of river and stream await the angler in the Ottawa National Steelhead and Salmon - yarn fly or spawn bags, usually drifed using one or two split-shot. Forest. Stream fishing is available throughout the Forest, and lake fishing is concentrated in the southern half of the Forest. Live bait, although messy, hard to care for, and difficult to fish, generally works best. ‘Tough-to-catch’ species such as walleye, crappie and smallmouth bass are those that most often require live bait. However, The Ottawa National Forest offers outstanding opportunities for hunting and fishing. These activities are even these species will fall for the right combination of bait and presentation. regulated by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). The information contained in this document is meant to enhance your fishing experience. The Michigan Fishing Guide is available wherever fishing licenses are sold. WANT TO KNOW MORE? WHEN TO FISH In the Upper Peninsula, the Michigan trout season runs from the last Saturday in April to September 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Community Surveys for Potential Landscape Units
    Natural Community Surveys of Potential Landscape Units Prepared by: Joshua G. Cohen Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 30444 Lansing, MI 48909-7944 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division September 30, 2009 Report Number 2009-14 Suggested Citation: Cohen, J.G.. 2009. Natural Community Surveys of Potential Landscape Units. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2009-14, Lansing, MI. 14 pp. Copyright 2009 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status, or family status. Cover photo: High-quality mesic northern forest within the McCormick - Rocking Chair NMF Potential Landscape Unit (all photographs by Joshua G. Cohen). IX.1 Rock Lake NMF Conducted surveys with assistance from Otto Jacob during one of the days. Surveys focused on dry-mesic northern forest and granitic features within the forested matrix. Documented high-quality dry-mesic northern forest, granite bedrock glade, granite cliff, poor fen, northern wet meadow, and submergent marsh. The juxtaposition of high-quality bedrock features adjacent to high-quality wetlands was notable. In addition, the following natural communities were identified as inclusions or zones within these communities or were noted in passing during the course of surveys: rich conifer swamp, muskeg, and northern shrub thicket. Photo by Joshua G. Cohen Submergent marsh, Rock Lake NMF Granite cliff, Rock Lake NMF Groveland Minds Conducted surveys with Otto Jacob. Surveys focused on dry-mesic northern forest and granitic features within the forested matrix. Documented high-quality dry-mesic northern forest, granite cliff, and northern wet meadow.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Ontonagon, Presque Isle, Iron, Montreal, and Upper Wisconsin
    MI/DEQ/WRD-11/023 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION MAY 2011 STAFF REPORT A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ONTONAGON, PRESQUE ISLE, IRON, MONTREAL, AND UPPER WISCONSIN RIVERS WATERSHEDS AND OTHER SELECTED NONBASIN YEAR WATERSHEDS GOGEBIC, HOUGHTON, IRON, AND ONTONAGON COUNTIES, MICHIGAN JUNE 2008 INTRODUCTION Staff from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Assessment Section (SWAS), assessed the biological, chemical, and physical habitat conditions of selected streams located in the Ontonagon (HUC 04020102), Presque Isle (HUC 04020101), Iron (HUC 04020101), Montreal (HUC 04010302), and Upper Wisconsin (HUC 07070001) Rivers watersheds (OPIMU), and other selected nonbasin year watersheds. The habitat and macroinvertebrate community were qualitatively evaluated using the SWAS Procedure 51 (MDEQ, 1990; Creal et al., 1996) at 28 wadeable sites and the draft SWAS Procedure 91 (MDEQ, 2011a) at 2 nonwadeable sites. Water chemistry samples were collected at 13 sites (Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4; Figure 1). E. coli samples were collected at 3 sites on Powder Mill Creek (Table 5). The specific survey objective of these monitoring activities includes, but is not limited to, the following: • Evaluate the current biological and physical conditions at targeted and randomly selected stations in the OPIMU watersheds for attainment of Michigan Water Quality Standards (WQS). • Identify sources of sediment and other nonpoint source (NPS) pollution. • Evaluate the effectiveness of specific NPS water quality improvement projects. • Fulfill water quality monitoring recommendations submitted by the Upper Peninsula NPS water quality monitoring team, other agencies, and the public. GENERAL WATERSHED HISTORY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION The OPIMU watersheds are located in the extreme west end of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Ontonagon River Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This river assessment is one of a series of documents being prepared by Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), Fisheries Division, for Michigan rivers. This report describes the physical and biological characteristics of the Ontonagon River, discusses how human activities have influenced the river, and serves as an information base for future management activities. Our approach is consistent with Fisheries Division’s mission to “protect and enhance fish environments, habitat, and populations and other forms of aquatic life and to promote the optimum use of these resources for the benefit of the people of Michigan.” River assessments are intended to provide a comprehensive reference for citizens and agency personnel seeking information on a particular river. By compiling and synthesizing existing information, river assessments reveal the complex relationships between rivers, watershed landscapes, biological communities, and humans. This assessment shows the influence of humans on the Ontonagon River and provides an approach for identifying opportunities and addressing problems related to aquatic resources in the Ontonagon River watershed. We hope that this document will increase public awareness of the Ontonagon River and its challenges, and encourage citizens to become more actively involved in decision-making processes that provide sustainable benefits to the river and its users. This document consists of three parts: an introduction, a river assessment, and management options. The river assessment is the nucleus of the report. It provides a description of the Ontonagon River and its watershed in thirteen sections: geography, history, geology, hydrology, soils and land use, channel morphology, dams and barriers, water quality, special jurisdictions, biological communities, fishery management, recreational use, and citizen involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Ontonagon, Presque Isle, Black, and Montreal River Watersheds
    MI/DEQ/WRD-13/014MI/DEQ/WRD-15/024 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION JULY 2015 STAFF REPORT A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ONTONAGON, PRESQUE ISLE, BLACK, AND MONTREAL RIVERS WATERSHEDS AND OTHER SELECTED WATERSHEDS IN GOGEBIC, HOUGHTON, IRON, AND ONTONAGON COUNTIES, MICHIGAN JULY-AUGUST 2013 INTRODUCTION Staff of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Assessment Section (SWAS), conducted biological, chemical, and physical habitat surveys during the summer of 2013 throughout the Ontonagon (Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC] 04020102), Presque Isle (HUC 04020101), Black (HUC 04020101), and Montreal (HUC 04010302) (OPBM) Rivers watersheds. Additionally, some streams located in smaller western Lake Superior coastal watersheds were surveyed (Figure 1). The goals of this monitoring were to: (1) assess the current status and condition of individual water bodies and determine whether Michigan Water Quality Standards (WQS) are being met; (2) evaluate biological integrity temporal trends; (3) satisfy monitoring requests submitted by external and internal customers; and (4) identify potential nonpoint source (NPS) pollution problems. These surveys qualitatively characterized the biotic integrity of macroinvertebrate communities with respect to existing habitat conditions at randomly selected sites throughout the OPBM watersheds region. The results of the surveys are used by the SWAS’s Status and Trends Program to estimate the amount of these watersheds that is supporting the other indigenous aquatic life and wildlife designated use component of R 323.1100(1)(e) of the Part 4 rules, WQS, promulgated under Part 31, Water Resources Protection, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended. BACKGROUND AND HISTORICAL SAMPLING EFFORTS The OPBM watersheds are located in the extreme west end of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
    Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Campings Michigan
    Campings Michigan Alanson Coopersville - Camp Pet-O-Se-Ga - Conestoga Grand River Campground - Artisian Springs Resort Crystal Falls Allegan - Bewabic State Park campground - Tri-Ponds Family Camp Resort - Gibson Lake Park & Campgrounds Baraga De Tour Village - Baraga State Park campground - Paradise Point RV Park Bay City Detroit en omgeving - Bay City State Park Camping - Detroit/Ann Arbor KOA - Haas Lake Park RV Campground in New Hudson Boyne City, Young State Park - Northpointe Shores RV Resort in Ira - Spruce campground Elk Rapids Brighton - Honcho Rest Campground - Brighton Bishop Lake Emmett Brimley - Emmett KOA - Brimley State Park campground - Bay View Campground Ferrysburg - P.J. Hoffmaster State Park campground Buchanan - Bear Cave RV Campground Fort Gratiot - Lakeport State Park campground Carsonville - Yogi Bear’s Jellystone North Porth Huron Camp Resort Frankenmuth - Yogi Bear’s Jellystone Frankenmuth Camp Resort Champion - Van Riper State Park campground Garden - Michihamme Shores Campground - Fayette State Park campground Cheboygan Gaylord - Aloha State Park campground - Gaylord KOA Holiday - Otsego Lake County Park - Otsego Lake State Park campground Grand Haven - Eastpointe RV Resort Grand Rapids en omgeving - Steamboat Park Campground in Georgetown - Allendale / West Grand Rapids KOA - Baldwin Oaks Campground in Hundsonville - Indian Valley Campground in Middleville - Woodchip campground in Byron Center Grayling - Yogi Bear’s Jellystone Grayling Camp Resort - Hartwick Pines State Park campground Gwinn - Horseshoe Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) Grants for 5 Active Or Completed Projects
    The COUNTY ALCONA MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND was established under the Kammer Recreational Land Trust Fund Act of 1976 to provide a permanent funding source for the public acquisition of land for resource protection and public outdoor recreation. Funding is provided by revenue derived from royalties on the sale and lease of state-owned oil, gas and mineral rights. This landmark piece of legislation came to fruition thanks to the collaborative efforts of the Michigan Oil and Gas Association, Michigan United Conservation Clubs and state legislators on behalf of all Michigan citizens. The MNRTF has contributed immeasurably to protecting our state’s natural beauty and helped paved the way for wise and prudent development of our state’s abundant energy resources. To date, the MNRTF has awarded over $1.1 billion in grants to Michigan’s state and local parks, waterways, trails and nature preserves throughout all 83 counties. Of this total, $245 million has been invested in trails. In excess of 1,000 public parks have been acquired and / or developed. Other projects funded include ball fields, tennis courts, trailheads, restrooms and other amenities, for a total of just under 2,500 MNRTF-assisted projects since 1976. ALCONA COUNTY Alcona County has received $644,100 in Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) grants for 5 active or completed projects. Alcona County Active or Completed MNRTF projects ALCONA TOWNSHIP • Park Improvements: $108,700 CALEDONIA TOWNSHIP • Hubbard Lake North End Park Development: $245,400 DNR – PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION • South Bay-Hubbard Lake: $145,000 DNR – WILDLIFE DIVISION • Hubbard Lake Wetlands: $130,000 VILLAGE OF LINCOLN • Brownlee Lake Boat Launch: $15,000 ALGER COUNTY ALGER The MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND was established under the Kammer Recreational Land Trust Fund Act of 1976 to provide a permanent funding source for the public acquisition of land for resource protection and public outdoor recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund July 2002
    Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund July 2002 Approved Projects by County Finance and Operations Services Bureau - Department of Natural Resources Project Project County Project No Applicant Type Project Title Grant Amount Status Alcona TF94-272 CURTIS TOWNSHIP D Indian Lake Picnic Area $15,000 Withdrawn Alcona TF70-786 DNR - PARKS & RECREATION A South Bay-Hubbard Lake $145,000 Closed Alcona TF70-890 DNR - WILDLIFE A Hubbard Lake Wetlands $130,000 Closed Alcona County Total $290,000 Alger TF87-124 BURT TOWNSHIP A Carpenter Creek Beach $7,900 Closed DNR - FOREST, MINERAL & FIRE Alger TF92-846 MANAGEMENT A Laughing Whitefish Marsh $150,000 Withdrawn Alger TF90-311 MUNISING D Munising City Marina $315,000 Closed Alger TF88-025 MUNISING TOWNSHIP A Munising Twp. Rec. Area $37,500 Closed Alger TF01-062 MUNISING TOWNSHIP D McQuisten Park Boardwalk $174,640 Active Alger County Total $685,040 Allegan TF90-235 ALLEGAN D Jaycee Park $173,900 Closed Allegan TF00-076 ALLEGAN COUNTY D Gun Lake County Park Improvements $155,881 Active Allegan TF91-351 ALLEGAN COUNTY D West Side Park $96,800 Closed Allegan TF95-126 ALLEGAN COUNTY D Littlejohn Lake Co. Park $96,000 Closed Dumont Lake County Park Allegan TF00-077 ALLEGAN COUNTY D Improvements $229,141 Active Allegan TF70-962 DNR - PARKS & RECREATION A Douglas Area Marina $184,600 Closed Allegan TF70-091 DNR - PARKS & RECREATION A Saugatuck Dunes $400,000 Closed Allegan TF70-738 DNR - PARKS & RECREATION A Saugatuck Dunes $400,000 Closed Allegan TF70-286 DNR - PARKS & RECREATION A Saugatuck Dunes $350,000 Closed Allegan TF70-560 DNR - WILDLIFE A Allegan Property $420,000 Closed Allegan TF95-087 DORR TOWNSHIP A Dorr Park Acquisition $90,000 Withdrawn Allegan TF95-024 LAKETOWN TOWNSHIP A Laketown Dunes Acq.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM of UNDERSTANDING Between
    OMB 0596-0217 USDA, Forest Service FS-1500-15 FS Agreement No. 14-MU-11090700-002 ~~~~~~~~- Cooperator Agreement No. ~~~~~~~~- MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Bergland Township Chicaugon Lake Homeowners Association Cisco Chain Riparian Owners Association Friends of Sylvania Gogebic Conservation District Gogebic County Forestry And Parks Commission Hagerman Lake Property Owners Association Invasive Species Control Coalition of Watersmeet (ISCCW) Iron County Conservation District Iron Lake Property Owners Association Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Lac Vieux Desert Lake Association Lake Gogebic Association Lake Mary Association Langford Lake Milfoil Association Long Lake Property Owners Association Many Waters LLC Maplewood Timberlands Association Michigan DNR: Bewabic State Park Michigan DNR: Forest Resources Division Michigan DNR: Lake Gogebic State Park Michigan DNR: Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park Michigan Trails and Recreation Alliance of Land and the Environment (Ml­ TRALE) Ni-Miikanaake Chapter of the North Country Trail Association Perch Lake Owners Association Property Owners of Fortune Lake Association Sunset Lake Property Owners Association Swan Lake Association Upper Peninsula Resource Conservation & Development Council (UPRC&D) USDA- Natural Resources Conservation Service White Water Associates, Inc. And The USDA, FOREST SERVICE OTTAWA NATIONAL FOREST This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is hereby made and entered into by and between Bergland Township, Chicaugon Lake Association, Cisco Chain
    [Show full text]
  • CS-214 Position Description Form
    CS-214 Position Code Rev 11/2013 PARKMGR1A15N State of Michigan Civil Service Commission Capitol Commons Center, P.O. Box 30002 Lansing, MI 48909 POSITION DESCRIPTION This position description serves as the official classification document of record for this position. Please complete this form as accurately as you can as the position description is used to determine the proper classification of the position. 2.Employee’s Name (Last, First, M.I.) 8.Department/Agency Vacant Natural Resources 3.Employee Identification Number 9.Bureau (Institution, Board, or Commission) Resource Management 4.Civil Service Position Code Description 10.Division Parks and Recreation Manager 1 Parks and Recreation 5.Working Title (What the agency calls the position) 11.Section Park Manager Western Upper Peninsula District 6.Name and Position Code Description of Direct Supervisor 12.Unit Douglas M. Rich, Park and Recreation Manager 3 Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park 7.Name and Position Code Description of Second Level Supervisor 13.Work Location (City and Address)/Hours of Work Anna Sylvester, State Administrative Manager 1 33303 Headquarters Road, Ontonagon, MI 49953 Mon-Fri, 8:00 am – 4:30 PM, Hours May Vary 14. General Summary of Function/Purpose of Position The function of this position is a manager, overseeing the activities of 11 full full-time employee, one seasonal employee, and 29 STW-4 staff. This position is responsible for the overall direction, oversight, and management of the Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Lake Gogebic State Park, developed boating access sites, snowmobile and off-road vehicle trails and all associated facilities, equipment and grounds.
    [Show full text]