NCH Annual Report 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NCH Annual Report 2008 Network of Concerned Historians NCH Annual Report 2017 http://www.concernedhistorians.org INTRODUCTION The twenty-third Annual Report of the Network of Concerned Historians (NCH) contains news about the domain where history and human rights intersect, especially about the censorship of history and the persecution of historians, archivists and archaeologists around the globe, as reported by various human rights organizations and other sources. It mainly covers events and developments of 2016 and 2017. Disclaimer. The fact that the NCH presents this news does not imply that it shares the views and beliefs of the historians and others mentioned in it. Download this report at: http://www.concernedhistorians.org/ar/17.pdf Cite this report as: Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2017 (http://www.concernedhistorians.org/ar/17.pdf). For the complete set of NCH Annual Reports, see: http://www.concernedhistorians.org/content/ar.html Or click: 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 All Annual Reports (1995–2017) were compiled by Antoon De Baets. Please send any comments to [email protected] Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2017 (July 2017) 2 ____________________________________________________________ AFGHANISTAN Previous Annual Report entries: 2000–2016. ALBANIA Previous Annual Report entries: 1996, 2012, 2015−2016. In April 2015, the parliament passed a law opening up files from the secret police (Sigurimi) of the Communist era (1944–1991) to people who were spied upon and barring former Sigurimi members from holding public office in the future. An estimated 7,000 opponents of the regime were killed and more than 100,000 deported to labor camps. During the Communist era, 90 percent of the Sigurimi files were destroyed every five years as a routine practice. In 1991 many of the remaining files were destroyed; the rest is kept in the Interior Ministry archive. Kastriot Dervishi, the archive’s former director, estimated that the surviving documents comprised random samples from the files of only 12,000 or so Sigurimi collaborators—roughly 10 percent of the total. Unofficial sources believe that about 20 percent of Albanians collaborated with the Sigurimi. In December 2016, Prime Minister Edi Rama announced that, as a follow-up to the 2015 law, a commission had been charged with opening the Sigurimi files and with vetting candidates for public office to see if they collaborated with the repressive regime. The commission was chaired by Gentiana Sula, a former deputy minister of social welfare. She said that initial estimates suggested that there were “millions of pages of documents, more than 120,000 files and 250,000 records.” Critics feared that the 2015 law did not oblige the government to publicize the findings of searches or to remove officials who were former collaborators. Albania also planned to sign an agreement with the International Commission on Missing Persons, paving the way for an official effort to find and identify the remains of some 6,000 disappeared.1 1 “Albania Opens Communist Secret Police Files,” BBC News (1 May 2015); Matthew Brunwasser, “As Albania Reckons With Its Communist Past, Critics Say It’s Too Late,” New York Times (26 February 2017); Amnesty International, Amnesty International Report 2016/17: The State of the World’s Human Rights (London: AI, 2017), 62; Briseida Mema, “Opening Secret Police Files, Albania Seeks to Drain the Swamp,” AFP News (27 March 2017). Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2017 (July 2017) 3 ____________________________________________________________ ALGERIA Previous Annual Report entries: 1996, 2001–2016. Perpetrators of human rights crimes and abuses during the internal armed conflict (1992−2000) continued to enjoy impunity under the 2006 Charter for Peace and National Reconciliation. The charter criminalized comments deemed to denigrate the security forces or state institutions for their conduct during the armed conflict, when both state forces and extremist Islamist groups committed torture, enforced disappearances, unlawful killings, and other serious abuses. Associations representing the families of the disappeared continued to face denial for legal registration. Families of the disappeared alleged being subject to pressures because they refused compensation from the state in exchange for accepting a death certificate for their still-missing relatives. The authorities also continued to protect state forces responsible for serious crimes in the 1990s by criminalizing calls for justice, thus turning the law on its head.2 In June 2016, the French gave 22 volumes of copies of diplomatic documents about the Liberation War (1954–1962) to the Algerian national archives. On 31 October 2016, Director General of the National Archives Abdelmadjid Sheikhi (Chikhi) accused the French authorities of hiding their Algerian archives (estimated by him at sixty tons of documents), which were secretly transferred to France in the last years of colonization (1961−1962). On 2 February 2017, the Cour des comptes (public auditor) found that the archives brought to France from Algeria and Indochina after decolonization and located in its National Archives had not been preserved, catalogued or made accessible adequately. Only an unspecified quantity of records relating to the 17 October 1961 massacre and to the Algerian war of independence had been made accessible after May 1999 and April 2001 respectively.3 In 2017, Leila Sidhoum, assistant professor at the Faculty of Political Science of the University of Algiers 3, was awarded a distinction for her PhD research on the role of governing elites in the period between 1989 and 2016. However, the acting dean reportedly blocked her degree and pulled her work from the university library. Sidhoum said that she had been told to remove parts of the thesis referring to the army, the president and the banned Islamic Salvation Front political party (FIS) during the 2 Amnesty International, Amnesty International Report 2016/17: The State of the World’s Human Rights (London: AI, 2017), 54, 65; Human Rights Watch, World Report 2017: Events of 2016 (New York: Human Rights Watch, 2017), 76. 3 “La France remet à l'Algérie des copies d’archives de guerre,” CRIonline (22 June 2016); “France Accused of Hiding Its Archive Smuggled during Colonial Era,” Memo: Middle East Monitor (1 November 2016); APS “La Conservation des archives rapatriés d'Algérie en 1962 est ‘défaillante’” Al Huffington Post (4 February 2017). Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2017 (July 2017) 4 ____________________________________________________________ armed conflict (1992–2000).4 See also France, Mali. ANGOLA Previous Annual Report entries: 2003, 2009, 2016. On 29 June 2016, the Supreme Court in Luanda ordered the conditional release of the group of seventeen known as the Luanda Book Club [see NCH Annual Report 2016] after it upheld a habeas corpus petition filed in April, requesting that the seventeen be released pending a decision on their appeal to the Constitutional Court. The seventeen were not allowed to leave Angola and were required to check in with the authorities every month while waiting for the decision. Upon their release, they reportedly walked through the streets of Luanda, shouting “Reading is not a crime!”5 ARGENTINA Previous Annual Report entries: 1997–2016. As of September 2016, 2,541 people had been charged, 723 convicted, and 76 acquitted of crimes allegedly committed by the military junta during the “Dirty War” (1976−1983), according to the Attorney General’s Office. Prosecutions were made possible by a series of actions taken in the early 2000s by Congress, the Supreme Court, and federal judges annulling amnesty laws and striking down pardons of former officials implicated in the crimes. As of November 2016, 121 children illegally taken from their parents during the war had been located. In May 2016, a federal court convicted fourteen former military and intelligence chiefs from Argentina and one from Uruguay of crimes against humanity committed as part of the “Plan Condor,” a coordinated intelligence plan launched in the 1970s by the de facto governing military regimes in Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay. Reynaldo Bignone, the last de facto president of Argentina at the time, was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment for his role in hundreds of enforced disappearances during Plan Condor. A further fourteen military leaders were 4 Ahmed Rouaba, “Algerian Student: ‘University Censored My Political Thesis’,” BBC News (4 July 2017). 5 “Angola Court Orders Conditional Release of Jailed Activist Book Club,” Guardian (29 June 2016); PEN International, “Luanda Book Club Activists Conditionally Released” (Update #1 to RAN 07/16; 8 July 2016). Network of Concerned Historians, Annual Report 2017 (July 2017) 5 ____________________________________________________________ sentenced to imprisonment. In August 2016, the sentence on the “La Perla” historical trial—which included clandestine centers in Córdoba Province—was rendered, sentencing 28 perpetrators to life imprisonment without parole for crimes that included torture, homicide, and the illegal abduction of babies in 1974—the first conviction for abuses committed before the 1976 coup. Nine sentences were passed for between two and fourteen years’ imprisonment and six acquittals. By December 2016, the Bicameral Commission to identify economic and financial interests
Recommended publications
  • How Russia Tried to Start a Race War in the United States
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 24 2019 Virtual Hatred: How Russia Tried to Start a Race War in the United States William J. Aceves California Western School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Communications Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, and the Law and Race Commons Recommended Citation William J. Aceves, Virtual Hatred: How Russia Tried to Start a Race War in the United States, 24 MICH. J. RACE & L. 177 (2019). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol24/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VIRTUAL HATRED: HOW RUSSIA TRIED TO START A RACE WAR in the UNITED STATES William J. Aceves* During the 2016 U.S. presidential election, the Russian government engaged in a sophisticated strategy to influence the U.S. political system and manipulate American democracy. While most news reports have focused on the cyber-attacks aimed at Democratic Party leaders and possible contacts between Russian officials and the Trump presidential campaign, a more pernicious intervention took place. Throughout the campaign, Russian operatives created hundreds of fake personas on social media platforms and then posted thousands of advertisements and messages that sought to promote racial divisions in the United States. This was a coordinated propaganda effort.
    [Show full text]
  • HRWF Human Rights in the World Newsletter Bulgaria Table Of
    Table of Contents • EU votes for diplomats to boycott China Winter Olympics over rights abuses • CCP: 100th Anniversary of the party who killed 50 million • The CCP at 100: What next for human rights in EU-China relations? • Missing Tibetan monk was sentenced, sent to prison, family says • China occupies sacred land in Bhutan, threatens India • 900,000 Uyghur children: the saddest victims of genocide • EU suspends efforts to ratify controversial investment deal with China • Sanctions expose EU-China split • Recalling 10 March 1959 and origins of the CCP colonization in Tibet • Tibet: Repression increases before Tibetan Uprising Day • Uyghur Group Defends Detainee Database After Xinjiang Officials Allege ‘Fake Archive’ • Will the EU-China investment agreement survive Parliament’s scrutiny? • Experts demand suspension of EU-China Investment Deal • Sweden is about to deport activist to China—Torture and prison be damned • EU-CHINA: Advocacy for the Uyghur issue • Who are the Uyghurs? Canadian scholars give profound insights • Huawei enables China’s grave human rights violations • It's 'Captive Nations Week' — here's why we should care • EU-China relations under the German presidency: is this “Europe’s moment”? • If EU wants rule of law in China, it must help 'dissident' lawyers • Happening in Europe, too • U.N. experts call call for decisive measures to protect fundamental freedoms in China • EU-China Summit: Europe can, and should hold China to account • China is the world’s greatest threat to religious freedom and other basic human rights
    [Show full text]
  • ZEN LESSONS the Art of Leadership
    ZEN LESSONS The Art of Leadership 1^1 Translated by Thomas Cleary ZEN LESSONS Zen Lessons is available as an audio tape from Shambhala Lion Editions. ZEN LESSONS The Art ofLeadership Translated by THOMAS CLEARY SHAMBHALA Boston & London 1989 Shambhaia Publications, Inc. Horticultural Hall 300 Massachusetts Avenue Boston, Massachusetts 02115 © 1989 by Thomas Cleary All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. 9 8 7 Printed in the United States of America ® This edition is printed on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standards Institute Z39.48 Standard. Distributed in the United States by Random House, Inc., and in Canada by Random House of Canada Ltd Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Zen lessons the art of leadership / translated by Thomas Cleary, p. cm. isbn 0-87773-446-1 (pbk.) 1. Priests, Zen— China— Quotations. 2. Leadership— Religious aspects— Zen Buddhism— Quotations, maxims, etc. 3. Zen Buddhism— China— Doctrines— Quotations, maxims, etc. I. Cleary, Thomas F. 1949- BQ9267.Z4661 1989 88-18604 294.3 , 6-dcl9 CIP CONTENTS Translator’s Introduction xiii Notes on Sources xxi 1. Enlightened Virtue 1 2. Study and Learning 1 3. Great and Small Evil 2 4. Honesty 2 5. A Vessel of Enlightenment 3 6. Modesty 4 7. Rules 4 8. Worry and Trouble 5 9. A Swift Bird 6 10. Work and the Way 6 1 1 . Hot and Cold 7 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Bangladesh and Bangladesh-U.S. Relations
    Bangladesh and Bangladesh-U.S. Relations Updated October 17, 2017 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44094 Bangladesh and Bangladesh-U.S. Relations Summary Bangladesh (the former East Pakistan) is a Muslim-majority nation in South Asia, bordering India, Burma, and the Bay of Bengal. It is the world’s eighth most populous country with nearly 160 million people living in a land area about the size of Iowa. It is an economically poor nation, and it suffers from high levels of corruption. In recent years, its democratic system has faced an array of challenges, including political violence, weak governance, poverty, demographic and environmental strains, and Islamist militancy. The United States has a long-standing and supportive relationship with Bangladesh, and it views Bangladesh as a moderate voice in the Islamic world. In relations with Dhaka, Bangladesh’s capital, the U.S. government, along with Members of Congress, has focused on a range of issues, especially those relating to economic development, humanitarian concerns, labor rights, human rights, good governance, and counterterrorism. The Awami League (AL) and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) dominate Bangladeshi politics. When in opposition, both parties have at times sought to regain control of the government through demonstrations, labor strikes, and transport blockades, as well as at the ballot box. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has been in office since 2009, and her AL party was reelected in January 2014 with an overwhelming majority in parliament—in part because the BNP, led by Khaleda Zia, boycotted the vote. The BNP has called for new elections, and in recent years, it has organized a series of blockades and strikes.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Security-Intelligence Services in the Republic of Serbia Bogoljub Milosavljević and Predrag Petrović
    3. Security-Intelligence Services in the Republic of Serbia Bogoljub Milosavljević and Predrag Petrović The Security-intelligence services (hence the intelligence services) are among the most important executive actors in any national security systems. In this chapter the term intelligence services denotes only specialised civilian and mili- tary organisations with security-intelligence functions, established within the state apparatus and operating under government control. Intelligence serv- ices should, first of all, provide state bodies with timely, relevant and precise 208 information. They should protect the constitutional order and national interests against penetration by foreign intelligence services and activities of organised criminal and terrorist groups. They are authorised to collect information from public sources, and can use secret methods, techniques and means.285 There are three organisations in Serbia with these responsibilities; the Secu- rity-Information Agency (SIA), the Military Security Agency (MSA) and the Mili- tary Intelligence Agency (MoI). The SIA is directly subordinated to the govern- ment and has the status of a special republic organisation, while both the MSA and MoI are organisational units (administrative bodies) within the Ministry of Defence (MoD) subordinated to the defence minister, and thus also to the gov- ernment. The functions of the intelligence services are specified by positive legal regulations286 and include the usual intelligence activities: 1. The collection and analysis of data relevant for national security, defence and protection of eco- 285 Reconciling the secrecy needs of intelligence services with the fundamental tenets of democ- racy is an important question. In order words, how can this secrecy be reconciled with transpar- ency of state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubij Bliznjeg Svog I
    Marko Lopušina UBIJ BLIŽNJEG SVOG I-III (ULOMCI) Jugoslovenska tajna policija 1945/1997. UBIJ BLIŽNJEG SVOG I. REC AUTORA Tajnost je glavni i osnovni princip postojanja i rada svih obavestajnih sluzbi sveta, pa i srpske i jugoslovenske tajne policije. U toj tajni o sebi i drugima, sadrzana su snaga, moc i dugovecnost drzavne politicke policije, koja postoji na ovim nasim prostorima poslednjih pedeset godina. Njen zadatak je od 1945. do pocetka devedesetih, a i kasnije, uvek bio da brani, stiti i cuva drzavu, vlast, partiju i njen politicki vrh od tzv. unutrasnjeg i spoljnjeg neprijatelja. Zato su Oznu, Udbu, SDB, politicki celnici od miloste zvali „pesnica komunizma“ ili ponekad i "stit revolucije". cinjenica je da su jugoslovensku tajnu sluzbu stvarali i vodili Hrvati i Slovenci, a da su njeni najrevnosniji policajci bili Srbi, samo zato, sto su se trudili da dokazu svoju odanost Titu i Partiji. Kao verni cuvari Broza i druge Jugoslavije, Srbi "oznasi", "udbasi", "debejci", proganjali su, mnogo puta i bez suda, ne samo po principu velikog broja i velike nacije vec i svesno, upravo vlastiti narod. Srbi su u drugoj Jugoslaviji bili sami sebi i gonici i progonjeni, tacnije i dzelati i zrtve tajne policije. Malo je reci u srpskom jeziku koje tako sumorno zvuce, kao sto je to rec Udba. U njoj je sadrzan sav ljudski gnev i tihi otpor prema jednom delu zivota u komunistickoj Jugoslaviji, koji su mnogi njeni zitelji potisnuli, makar prividno, iz secanja. Udbom i danas ljudi zovu sve jugoslovenske sluzbe drzavne bezbednosti, jer zele da na taj nacin pokazu koliko su svesni zla koje je politicka policija nanela vlastitom narodu.
    [Show full text]
  • 269 Abdul Aziz Angkat 17 Abdul Qadir Baloch, Lieutenant General 102–3
    Index Abdul Aziz Angkat 17 Turkmenistan and 88 Abdul Qadir Baloch, Lieutenant US and 83, 99, 143–4, 195, General 102–3 252, 253, 256 Abeywardana, Lakshman Yapa 172 Uyghurs and 194, 196 Abu Ghraib 119 Zaranj–Delarum link highway 95 Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) 251, 260 Africa 5, 244 Abuza, Z. 43, 44 Ahmad Humam 24 Aceh 15–16, 17, 31–2 Aimols 123 armed resistance and 27 Akbar Khan Bugti, Nawab 103, 104 independence sentiment and 28 Akhtar Mengal, Sardar 103, 104 as Military Operation Zone Akkaripattu- Oluvil area 165 (DOM) 20, 21 Aksu disturbances 193 peace process and Thailand 54 Albania 194 secessionism 18–25 Algeria Aceh Legislative Council 24 colonial brutality and 245 Aceh Monitoring Mission (AMM) 24 radicalization in 264 Aceh Referendum Information Centre Ali Jan Orakzai, Lieutenant General 103 (SIRA) 22, 24 Al Jazeera 44 Acheh- Sumatra National Liberation All Manipur Social Reformation, women Front (ASNLF) 19 protesters of 126–7 Aceh Transition Committee (Komite All Party Committee on Development Peralihan Aceh) (KPA) 24 and Reconciliation ‘act of free choice’, 1969 Papuan (Sri Lanka) 174, 176 ‘plebiscite’ 27 All Party Representative Committee Adivasi Cobra Force 131 (APRC), Sri Lanka 170–1 adivasis (original inhabitants) 131, All- Assam Students’ Union (AASU) 132 132–3 All- Bodo Students’ Union–Bodo Afghanistan 1–2, 74, 199 Peoples’ Action Committee Balochistan and 83, 100 (ABSU–BPAC) 128–9, 130 Central Asian republics and 85 Bansbari conference 129 China and 183–4, 189, 198 Langhin Tinali conference 130 India and 143 al- Qaeda 99, 143,
    [Show full text]
  • Contents AFRICA CENTRAL AFRICA
    War Crimes Prosecution Watch Editor-in-Chief Volume 11 - Kevin J. Vogel FREDERICK K. COX Issue 17 INTERNATIONAL LAW CENTER Technical Editor-in-Chief October 31, Jeradon Z. Mura Founder/Advisor 2016 Michael P. Scharf Managing Editors Dustin Narcisse Victoria Sarant War Crimes Prosecution Watch is a bi-weekly e-newsletter that compiles official documents and articles from major news sources detailing and analyzing salient issues pertaining to the investigation and prosecution of war crimes throughout the world. To subscribe, please email [email protected] and type "subscribe" in the subject line. Opinions expressed in the articles herein represent the views of their authors and are not necessarily those of the War Crimes Prosecution Watch staff, the Case Western Reserve University School of Law or Public International Law & Policy Group. Contents AFRICA CENTRAL AFRICA Central African Republic VOA News: At Least 23 Killed in Fighting in Central African Republic CCTV-Africa: U.S welcomes ICC verdict on Jean-Pierre Bemba DW: Deaths reported in violent Central African Republic protests Sudan & South Sudan NPR: As South Sudan Fights, Refugees Flow Into Uganda AllAfrica Global Media: Sudan: Govt Sues, Threatens Amnesty International UN News Centre: South Sudan: UN Human Rights Chief Warns of 'Alarming Rise' in Ethnic Hate Speech Deutsche Welle: Armed Groups Free 145 Child Soldiers in South Sudan Democratic Republic of the Congo Reuters: Inter-ethnic violence kills over a dozen in southeastern Congo Voice of America: World Court Convicts Congolese Warlord of Witness Tampering Daily Nation: DR Congo arrests top Rwandan rebel, says army BBC News: DR Congo arrests Rwanda FDLR rebel commander Reuters: U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Broad and Sustained Offensive on Human Rights That Started After President Xi Jinping Took Power Five Years Ago Showed No Sign of Abating in 2017
    JANUARY 2018 COUNTRY SUMMARY China The broad and sustained offensive on human rights that started after President Xi Jinping took power five years ago showed no sign of abating in 2017. The death of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo in a hospital under heavy guard in July highlighted the Chinese government’s deepening contempt for rights. The near future for human rights appears grim, especially as Xi is expected to remain in power at least until 2022. Foreign governments did little in 2017 to push back against China’s worsening rights record at home and abroad. The Chinese government, which already oversees one of the strictest online censorship regimes in the world, limited the provision of censorship circumvention tools and strengthened ideological control over education and mass media in 2017. Schools and state media incessantly tout the supremacy of the Chinese Communist Party, and, increasingly, of President Xi Jinping as “core” leader. Authorities subjected more human rights defenders—including foreigners—to show trials in 2017, airing excerpted forced confessions and court trials on state television and social media. Police ensured the detainees’ compliance by torturing some of them, denying them access to lawyers of their choice, and holding them incommunicado for months. In Xinjiang, a nominally autonomous region with 11 million Turkic Muslim Uyghurs, authorities stepped up mass surveillance and the security presence despite the lack of evidence demonstrating an organized threat. They also adopted new policies denying Uyghurs cultural and religious rights. Hong Kong’s human rights record took a dark turn. Hong Kong courts disqualified four pro-democracy lawmakers in July and jailed three prominent pro-democracy student leaders in August.
    [Show full text]
  • Rep. John Kavanagh (Vice-Chair) Rep
    House Committees Appropriations Education Rep. Regina Cobb (Chair) Rep. Michelle Udall (Chair) Rep. John Kavanagh (Vice-Chair) Rep. Bevely Pingerelli (Vice-Chair) Rep. César Chávez Rep. Daniel Hernandez Rep. Charlene Fernandez Rep. Joel John Rep. Randy Friese Rep. Quang Nguyen Rep. Jake Hoffman Rep. Jennifer Pawlik Rep. Steve Kaiser Rep. Frank Pratt Rep. Aaron Lieberman Rep. Bret Roberts Rep. Quang Nguyen Rep. Athena Salman Rep. Becky Nutt Rep. Judy Schweibert Rep. Joanne Osborne Rep. Judy Schwiebert Ethics Rep. Michelle Udall Rep. Becky Nutt (Chair) Rep. Frank Pratt (Vice-Chair) Commerce Rep. Domingo DeGrazia Rep. Jeff Weninger (Chair) Rep. Alma Hernandez Rep. Steve Kaiser (Vice-Chair) Rep. Jacqueline Parker Rep. Joseph Chaplik Rep. David Cook Government & Elections Rep. Diego Espinoza Rep. John Kavanagh (Chair) Rep. Charlene Fernandez Rep. Jake Hoffman (Vice-Chair) Rep. Robert Meza Rep. Judy Burges Rep. Becky Nutt Rep. Kelli Butler Rep. Pamela Powers Hannley Rep. Frank Carroll Rep. Justin Wilmeth Rep. John Fillmore Rep. Jennifer Jermaine Criminal Justice Reform Rep. Jennifer Pawlik Rep. Walt Blackman (Chair) Rep. Kevin Payne Rep. Shawnna Bolick (Vice-Chair) Rep. Athena Salman Rep. Reginald Bolding Rep. Stephanie Stahl Hamilton Rep. Alma Hernandez Rep. Raquel Terán Rep. Joel John Rep. Jeff Weninger Rep. Bret Roberts Rep. Diego Rodriguez Health & Human Services Rep. Raquel Terán Rep. Joanne Osborne (Chair) Rep. Ben Toma Rep. Regina Cobb (Vice-Chair) Rep. Kelli Butler Rep. Joseph Chaplik Rep. Randy Friese Rep. Alma Hernandez Rep. Jacqueline Parker Rep. Amish Shah Rep. Justin Wilmeth Judiciary Natural Resources, Energy & Water Rep. Frank Pratt (Chair) Rep. Gail Griffin (Chair) Rep. Jacqueline Parker (Vice-Chair) Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Bridget Christine Gelms Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ Dr. Jason Palmeri, Director ______________________________________ Dr. Tim Lockridge, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Lisa Weems, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT VOLATILE VISIBILITY: THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE HARASSMENT ON FEMINIST CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE by Bridget C. Gelms As our digital environments—in their inhabitants, communities, and cultures—have evolved, harassment, unfortunately, has become the status quo on the internet (Duggan, 2014 & 2017; Jane, 2014b). Harassment is an issue that disproportionately affects women, particularly women of color (Citron, 2014; Mantilla, 2015), LGBTQIA+ women (Herring et al., 2002; Warzel, 2016), and women who engage in social justice, civil rights, and feminist discourses (Cole, 2015; Davies, 2015; Jane, 2014a). Whitney Phillips (2015) notes that it’s politically significant to pay attention to issues of online harassment because this kind of invective calls “attention to dominant cultural mores” (p. 7). Keeping our finger on the pulse of such attitudes is imperative to understand who is excluded from digital publics and how these exclusions perpetuate racism and sexism to “preserve the internet as a space free of politics and thus free of challenge to white masculine heterosexual hegemony” (Higgin, 2013, n.p.). While rhetoric and writing as a field has a long history of examining myriad exclusionary practices that occur in public discourses, we still have much work to do in understanding how online harassment, particularly that which is gendered, manifests in digital publics and to what rhetorical effect.
    [Show full text]