ENDEAVOR GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ENDEAVOR GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2021 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-40373 ENDEAVOR GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 83-3340169 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 9601 Wilshire Boulevard, 3rd Floor Beverly Hills, CA 90210 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (310) 285-9000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Not Applicable (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Trading Name of each exchange Title of each class Symbol(s) on which registered Class A Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per EDR The New York Stock Exchange share Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☒ Accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ As of May 12, 2021, there were 259,498,002 shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock outstanding, 188,450,111 shares of the registrant’s Class X common stock outstanding and 238,154,302 shares of the registrant’s Class Y common stock outstanding. TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited) 6 Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. 6 Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 6 Notes to the Financial Statements 7 Endeavor Operating Company, LLC 9 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 9 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 10 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 11 Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Interests and Members’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 12 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 13 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 14 Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 32 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 46 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 46 Part II – OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings 47 Item 1A. Risk Factors 47 Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 75 Item 6. Exhibits 76 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Quarterly Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of present and historical facts contained in this Quarterly Report, including without limitation, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, prospects, assumptions, future events or expected performance, are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, you can generally identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms “may,” “will,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “target,” “predict,” “potential,” “contemplate,” or, in each case, their negative, or other variations or comparable terminology and expressions. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report are only predictions and are based on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, but not limited to: • the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations; • changes in public and consumer tastes and preferences and industry trends; • the effect of factors beyond our control, such as adverse economic conditions, on our operations; • our ability to adapt to or manage new content distribution platforms or changes in consumer behavior resulting from new technologies; • our reliance on our professional reputation and brand name; • our dependence on the relationships of our management, agents, and other key personnel with clients across many content categories; • our ability to identify, sign, and retain clients; • our ability to identify, recruit, and retain qualified and experienced agents and managers; • our ability to avoid or manage conflicts of interest arising from our client and business relationships; • the loss or diminished performance of members of our executive management and other key employees; • our dependence on key relationships with television and cable networks, satellite providers, digital streaming partners, corporate sponsors, and other distribution partners; • our ability to effectively manage the integration of and recognize economic benefits from businesses acquired, our operations at our current size, and any future growth; • the conduct of our operations through joint ventures and other investments with third parties; • immigration restrictions and related factors; • failure in technology, including at live events, or security breaches of our information systems; • the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or confidential client or customer information; • our substantial indebtedness; • our ability to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights, including our brand image and reputation, and the possibility that others may allege that we infringe upon their intellectual property rights; 1 • the risks associated with the legislative, judicial, accounting, regulatory, political and economic risks and conditions specific to both domestic and international markets; • fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; • litigation and other proceedings to the extent uninsured or underinsured; • our ability to comply with the U.S. and foreign governmental regulations to which we are subject; • our compliance with certain franchise and licensing requirements of unions and guilds and dependence on unionized labor; • our control by Messrs. Emanuel and Whitesell, the Executive Holdcos, and the Silver Lake Equityholders; • risk related to our organization and structure; • risks related to tax matters; • risks related to our Class A common stock; • other important factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those contemplated that are found in Part I, Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Part II, Item 1A., “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report and in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our final prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on Form 424(b)(4) on April 30, 2021 (the “Prospectus”) in connection with our initial public offering (the “IPO”). These risks could cause actual results to differ materially from those implied by forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risk factors and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all risk factors and uncertainties. Even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and the development of the industry in which we operate are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report, those results or developments may not
Recommended publications
  • DIRECTORY Full Sail University, 3300 University Blvd, Winter Park, FL 32792
    ® VIRTUAL CAREER FAIR - May 4, 2021 DIRECTORY Full Sail University, 3300 University Blvd, Winter Park, FL 32792 EMPLOYER GUIDE 3S Technologies, LLC | Booth #26 | https://www.3stechnologiesllc.com About: 3S Technologies LLC provides custom solutions for today’s niche needs in Information Technology, Business Management, and Learning & Development. Jobs Recruiting for at the Event: Mobile Game Design/ Dev, Character Artist (Anime), Animator, Costume Designer, Graphic Design/Dev, Digital Artist (Anime), 3D Generalist, Creative Writer, Digital Marketing Specialist, and Production Specialist Above the Mark | Booth #5 | http://abovethemarkinternational.com About: Our crew leaders have been in the Industry for over 30 years and have worked on projects all over the world. Above the Mark can be trusted to provide qualified labor for event production and intelligent, reliable, efficient minds to execute even the most elaborate ideas. Jobs Recruiting for at the Event: Freelance: Lighting Tech, Audio Tech, and Video Techs AdvertiseMInt, Inc | Booth #100 | https://www.advertisemint.com About: AdvertiseMint is the leading social advertising agency specializing in Facebook & Instagram ads. We help clients generate leads, increase sales, app installs and target new customers. Our team brings a fast-paced approach to managing ad campaigns while focusing on ROI. We drive conversions from untapped, targeted social media audiences for all businesses. Jobs Recruiting for at the Event: Video Editor, Graphic Designer, Media Buyers (Facebook, Google, Amazon, TikTok). Alicia Diagnostics, Inc. | Booth # 62 | https://aliciadiagnostics.com About: With over 30 years in the industry, we have the connections and resources to create and distribute the highest quality medical devices and supplies here in the US and all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2017 M&A and Investment Summary
    May 2017 M&A and Investment Summary Table of Contents 1 Overview of Monthly M&A and Investment Activity 3 2 Monthly M&A and Investment Activity by Industry Segment 8 3 Additional Monthly M&A and Investment Activity Data 42 4 About Petsky Prunier 55 Securities offered through Petsky Prunier Securities, LLC, member of FINRA. This M&A and Investment Summary has been prepared by and is being distributed in the United States by Petsky Prunier, a broker dealer registered with the U.S. SEC and a member of FINRA. 2 | M&A and Investment Summary May 2017 M&A and Investment Summary for All Segments Transaction Distribution . A total of 520 deals were announced in May 2017, of which 323 were worth $44.6 billion in aggregate reported value . Software was the most active segment with 189 deals announced — 123 of these transactions reported $10.0 billion in value . Digital Media/Commerce was also active with 117 transactions announced, of which 94 were worth a reported $14.1 billion in value . Strategic buyers announced 203 deals (49 reported $14.9 billion in value) . VC/Growth Capital investors announced 291 transactions (262 reported $15.7 billion in value) . Private Equity investors announced 26 deals during the month (12 reported $13.9 billion in value) May 2017 BUYER/INVESTOR BREAKDOWN Transactions Reported Value Strategic Buyout Venture/Growth Capital # % $MM % # $MM # $MM # $MM Software 189 36% $9,977.8 22% 59 $2,328.8 10 $4,845.0 120 $2,804.0 Digital Media/Commerce 117 23% 14,126.0 32% 36 2,027.4 2 1,500.0 79 10,598.6 Marketing Technology 85
    [Show full text]
  • The Brief Mergermarket’S Weekly Private Equity Round-Up
    The Brief mergermarket’s Weekly Private Equity Round-Up 24 December 2009 | Issue 44 Editorial 1 The Noticeboard 2 Private Equity Opportunities 3 Deals of the Week 9 Pipeline 17 Statistics 20 League & Activity Tables 23 Top Deals 32 Investor Profile: Affinity Equity Partners 35 Notes & Contacts 37 The Week That Was..... The last seven days: private equity in review 2009 was certainly an interesting year for private equity. The post- seen in the Financial Services sector and saw Bank of America global financial crisis deal making environment was one of the most raise much needed capital by selling its 5.78% stake in China challenging ever seen with issues surrounding leverage, corporate Construction Bank to a group of investors. The investors included valuations and a lack of viable targets all conspiring to dampen Singapore-based Temasek Holdings and Hopu Investment activity. Unsurprisingly, this is borne out in the raw numbers with a Management, the China-based private equity fund which has been total of 1,708 private equity-related deals coming to the market over particularly active this year. the course of 2009, worth a collective US$178.7bn. Compared to global announced activity in 2008, this represents a volume decline Despite significant buyout and exit activity in Europe, and to a of 39% while the 56% fall in valuations is even more pronounced, lesser extent Asia, it is unsurprising that the United States again perhaps unsurprising given continued issues surrounding debt emerged as the geography which attracted most private equity- financing and the related retrenchment to deal making at the mid related investment over the previous 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., Et Al.,1 ) Case No
    Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 513 Filed 07/13/20 Entered 07/13/20 20:00:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 113 Dennis F. Dunne, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) Tyler P. Brown (VSB No. 28072) Matthew Brod, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) Justin F. Paget (VSB No. 77949) MILBANK LLP Jennifer E. Wuebker (VSB No. 91184) 55 Hudson Yards HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP New York, New York 10001 Riverfront Plaza, East Tower Telephone: (212) 530-5000 951 East Byrd Street Facsimile: (212) 530-5219 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Telephone: (804) 788-8200 Andrew M. Leblanc, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) Facsimile: (804) 788-8218 MILBANK LLP 1850 K Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 835-7500 Proposed Co-Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-32299 (KLP) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) ) APPLICATION OF OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS OF INTELSAT S.A. FOR ENTRY OF ORDER AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT AND RETENTION OF BONN STEICHEN & PARTNERS AS SPECIAL COUNSEL EFFECTIVE AS OF JUNE 24, 2020 The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”) of Intelsat S.A. and each of its affiliated debtors and debtors-in-possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) in the above- captioned jointly administered chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), hereby submits this application (the “Application”) for entry of an order, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, 1 Due to the large number of Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, for which joint administration has been requested, a complete list of the Debtor entities and the last four digits of their federal tax identification numbers is not provided herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Capital Marke
    Participant List for Which Buy-Side Institutions Participate in Public Earnings Conference Calls? Implications for Capital Markets and Sell-Side Coverage Primary Total Number of Matched Research Institution Name Classification Secondary Classification Appearances Analysts Patterns 1060 Capital Management, LLC Buy-Side Hedge Fund 2 1 1 10K Capital LLC Buy-Side Registered Investment Advisor 5 1 1 12/21 Capital Management, LLC Buy-Side Hedge Fund 10 1 2 1492 Capital Management, LLC Buy-Side Hedge Fund 28 3 3 1837 Partners L.P. Buy-Side Hedge Fund 4 1 1 21st Century Equity Research Sell-Side 63 4 4 3i Group plc Buy-Side Private Equity 2 1 2 40|86 Advisors, Inc. Buy-Side Mutual Fund 5 4 4 451 Research LLC Sell-Side 4 4 3 86 Research Limited Sell-Side 15 2 1 A.G. Edwards Sell-Side 150 46 9 AAD Capital Management LP Buy-Side Hedge Fund 15 5 5 AB Analytical Services Buy-Side Mutual Fund 28 1 2 Abdiel Capital Advisors, LP Buy-Side Hedge Fund 6 1 1 Aberdeen Asset Management PLC Buy-Side Mutual Fund 18 2 6 Abernathy Group Buy-Side Hedge Fund 14 3 4 ABG Sundal Collier Sell-Side 45 10 6 Abingdon Capital Management Buy-Side Hedge Fund 7 2 2 ABN Amro Sell-Side 11 8 5 ABR Investment Strategy, LLC Sell-Side 69 8 5 Access 342, LLC Sell-Side 69 2 2 Accipiter Capital Management LLC Buy-Side Hedge Fund 4 1 2 Accretive Capital Partners, LLC Buy-Side Private Equity 11 1 3 ACI Research Sell-Side 12 1 1 ACK Asset Management, LLC Buy-Side Hedge Fund 25 3 4 Acorn Capital Partners, LLC Buy-Side Registered Investment Advisor5 1 1 Act II Capital, LLC Buy-Side Hedge Fund 21 2 4 Adage Capital Management Buy-Side Hedge Fund 205 5 4 ADAR Investment Management Buy-Side Hedge Fund 9 3 2 Adirondack Funds Buy-Side Mutual Fund 21 4 5 Adrian Day Asset Management Buy-Side Registered Investment Advisor9 1 1 Advantus Capital Management, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2018 M&A and Investment Summary
    December 2018 M&A and Investment Summary Table of Contents 1 Overview of Monthly M&A and Investment Activity 3 2 Monthly M&A and Investment Activity by Industry Segment 9 3 Additional Monthly M&A and Investment Activity Data 41 4 About Petsky Prunier 58 Securities offered through Petsky Prunier Securities, LLC, member of FINRA. This M&A and Investment Summary has been prepared by and is being distributed in the United States by Petsky Prunier, a broker dealer registered with the U.S. SEC and a member of FINRA. 2 | M&A and Investment Summary December 2018 M&A and Investment Summary for All Segments Transaction Distribution ▪ A total of 546 deals were announced in December 2018, of which 265 were worth $29.3 billion in aggregate reported value ▪ Software accounted for 35 percent of transactions with 191 deals announced— 114 of which reported $13.9 billion in value ▪ Software was also the most valuable segment, followed by Digital Media/Commerce, with 99 transactions announced – 67 of which valued at $9.7 billion ▪ Strategic buyers announced 279 deals (43 reported $15.1 billion in value) ▪ VC/Growth Capital investors announced 244 transactions (219 reported $10.5 billion in value) ▪ Private Equity buyers announced 23 deals during the month (3 reported $3.8 billion in value) December 2018 BUYER/INVESTOR BREAKDOWN Transactions Reported Value Strategic Buyout Venture/Growth Capital # % $MM % # $MM # $MM # $MM Software 191 35% $13,947.2 48% 73 $8,541.0 8 $1,800.0 110 $3,606.2 Digital Media/Commerce 99 18% $9,730.2 33% 35 $3,368.8 2 $1,800.0 62
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Richmond Division
    Case 20-32299-KLP Doc 510 Filed 07/13/20 Entered 07/13/20 19:54:26 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 122 Dennis F. Dunne, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) Tyler P. Brown (VSB No. 28072) Matthew L. Brod, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) Justin F. Paget (VSB No. 77949) Shivani Shah (admitted pro hac vice) Jennifer E. Wuebker (VSB No. 91184) MILBANK LLP HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP 55 Hudson Yards Riverfront Plaza, East Tower New York, New York 10001 951 East Byrd Street Telephone: (212) 530-5000 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Facsimile: (212) 530-5219 Telephone: (804) 788-8200 Facsimile: (804) 788-8218 Andrew M. Leblanc, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) MILBANK LLP 1850 K Street, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 835-7500 Proposed Co-Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) INTELSAT S.A., et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-32299 (KLP) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) APPLICATION OF OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR ENTRY OF AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT AND RETENTION OF HUNTON ANDREWS KUTH LLP AS CO-COUNSEL FOR THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS EFFECTIVE AS OF MAY 29, 2020 1 Due to the large number of Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, for which joint administration has been granted, a complete list of the Debtor entities and the last four digits of their federal tax identification numbers is not provided herein. A complete list may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at https://cases.stretto.com/intelsat.
    [Show full text]
  • Take-Private Deals (January 2016 - March 2017, Pitchbook )
    Take-Private Deals (January 2016 - March 2017, Pitchbook ) Company Name Primary Industry Sector Lead/Sole Investors Deal Size Deal Date Investors Performance Sports Group Consumer Products and Services (B2C) 575.00 28-Feb-2017 Antares Capital, Fairfax Financial Holdings (Paul Rivett), Sagard Capital (Paul Desmarais) Lionbridge Business Products and Services (B2B) H.I.G. Capital (Matthew Lozow) 369.00 28-Feb-2017 H.I.G. Capital (Matthew Lozow) Blue Nile Consumer Products and Services (B2C) 500.00 17-Feb-2017 Adama Partners, Bain Capital (Ryan Cotton), Bow Street (Howard Shainker) Purple Communications Information Technology 15-Feb-2017 CSDVRS (Sherri Turpin), Kinderhook Industries (Christian Michalik) Inteliquent Information Technology 800.00 10-Feb-2017 GTCR (Lawrence Fey), Onvoy (Fritz Hendricks) Team Health Holdings Healthcare The Blackstone Group (Neil Simpkins) 6,100.00 06-Feb-2017 Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, National Pension Service, Public Sector Pension Investment Board, The Blackstone Group (Neil Simpkins) Apollo Education Group Consumer Products and Services (B2C) 1,140.00 01-Feb-2017 Apollo Global Management (Larry Berg), Najafi Companies, The Vistria Group (Anthony Miller) Talen Energy Energy Riverstone Holdings (David Leuschen) 5,200.00 06-Dec-2016 Riverstone Holdings (David Leuschen) Interactive Intelligence Group Information Technology 1,400.00 01-Dec-2016 Banneker Partners (Stephen Davis), Corporate Capital Trust, Genesys (Paul Segre), Hellman & Friedman (Tarim Wasim), L Capital (Lancer Group), Permira (James
    [Show full text]
  • Return of the Mega Buyout?
    Return of the Mega Buyout? February 2013 Page 1 of 3 Fig. 1: Proportion of Aggregate Value of Private Equity-Backed Fig. 2: 10 Largest Private Equity Fund Managers by Aggregate Large-cap buyout deals accounted for 53% of the aggregate deal value in Buyout Deals by Value Band, 2006 - 2013 YTD (as at 20 February) Buyout Dry Powder (as at 20 February) 2012 - the highest annual proportion of aggregate deal value in the 2008- 2012 period. 100% Firm Name Dry Powder Country 90% Blackstone Group $13.5bn US 80% 35% The proportion of the number of global buyout deals made up by large-cap 47% 47% 50% 53% Advent International $12.8bn US 70% deals has been steadily increasing since 2009, from 3% of buyout deals in 75% Carlyle Group $9.3bn US 60% 82% 17% 86% 2009 to 8% in 2012. 50% Goldman Sachs Merchant Banking Division $7.5bn US 40% 15% 23% 23% Kohlberg Kravis Roberts $7.2bn US 20% 17% 30% BC Partners $7.0bn UK 15% Only one mega buyout fund (larger than $4.5bn) closed in 2010: Blackstone 11% 13% 11% 20% 11% 17% TPG $6.5bn US 7% Capital Partners VI, raising over $16bn. In 2012, four mega funds reached 12% 13% 10% 12% 2% 10% 5% 6% 6% Hellman & Friedman $6.4bn US Proportion of Aggregate Deal Value 4% 5% 8% 11% 6% 7% 7% 3% a fi nal close raising a total of $30bn. 0% 2% 3% 3% Leonard Green & Partners $6.3bn US 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 YTD Less than $100mn $100-249mn $250-499mn $500-999mn $1bn or more CVC Capital Partners $6.2bn UK The 10 largest buyout funds currently in market are all considered mega Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Investment, Venture Capital, and Private Equity in the Film and Television Industry
    Financialized Hollywood: Institutional Investment, Venture Capital, and Private Equity in the Film and Television Industry Andrew deWaard JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies (formerly Cinema Journal) 59.4 (2020). Forthcoming. Post-print version including revisions. Andrew deWaard is an Assistant Professor of Media and Popular Culture at the University of California, San Diego and is the co-author of The Cinema of Steven Soderbergh: indie sex, corporate lies, and digital videotape (Columbia University Press/Wallflower, 2013). Abstract: The financial sector has a hidden, but dramatic effect on Hollywood: three institutional investors hold the largest investment stakes in nearly all major companies; corporate venture capital has arisen within every entertainment conglomerate; and private equity firms have enacted leveraged buyouts of companies in all sectors, including production, distribution, exhibition, talent agencies, audience measurement, trade press, and content catalogues. This article argues that “Financialized Hollywood” is a dangerous development; financial engineering strategies are extracting capital and reducing operational capacity, further depriving Hollywood of the diversity and heterogeneity it might provide the public sphere. Keywords: finance, media industries, political economy, venture capital, media consolidation After a breakdown in negotiations with the Association of Talent Agencies on April 12, 2019, the Writers Guild of America (WGA) took the unprecedented step of instructing its members to fire their agents. More than seven thousand writers—92 percent of the guild— dutifully fired their agent. At issue was the WGA’s new Code of Conduct that prohibited agents from taking packaging fees (which they claim is a breach of fiduciary duty, as it incentivizes agencies to negotiate a lower fee for talent) or engaging in production (which they claim is a conflict of interest, as the agencies are again incentivized to lower fees).
    [Show full text]
  • Deals, Dollars, and Disputes
    Deals, Dollars, and Disputes MAXIMIZING VALUE MINIMIZING RISK A Summary of Private Equity Transactions for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014 CONTENTS Our Process and Methodology ................................................ 1 Summary of Q1 2014 PE Firm Transaction Activity ................ 2 Volume of PE Deals Announced and Completed ......................................... 2 Top 25 PE Firm Transactions by Deal Value Completed During Q1 2014 ............................................................................................... 3 Industry Sector Transaction Analyses ........................................................... 4 Purchase Price Premium for Transactions Involving Controlling Stakes ........................................................................................... 6 PE Acquisition Type Analyses ........................................................................ 6 Featured Transactions and Insights ........................................ 8 A Rapid Deal and a Shareholder Lawsuit: Who Wins and Why? ................. 8 A Financial Rescue Pays Off for Golden Gate in Signet Buyout of Zale .. 11 Introduction We are pleased to present you with our Deals, Dollars, and Disputes report for the quarter ended March 31, 2014. Our analysis involves a study of the merger and and acquisition transactions involving private equity firms (“PE firms”) during the Our Objective recent quarter. Our objective in preparing this report is to provide a general overview of the volume and value of transactions during the quarter
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Post-IPO Private Equity Ownership
    Norwegian School of Economics Bergen, Fall 2018 The Effect of Post-IPO Private Equity Ownership An empirical study of how post-IPO private equity ownership affects the stock market- and accounting performance of private equity-backed IPOs in the US Haakon Dalseth and Jonatan Larsen Supervisor: Aksel Mjøs Master thesis in Financial Economics NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS This thesis was written as a part of the Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration at NHH. Please note that neither the institution nor the examiners are responsible − through the approval of this thesis − for the theories and methods used, or results and conclusions drawn in this work. Abstract Private equity firms stay invested in their portfolio companies for up to several years after an initial public offering. Despite private equity firms having incentives and opportunities to continue influencing the companies, the effects of the retained ownership are uncertain. This study contributes to the understanding of how the long-run stock market- and accounting performance of portfolio companies is affected by private equity ownership post initial public offering. Panel data of publicly listed private equity-backed companies in the United States provides the basis for the analysis. Fixed effects, instrumental variable estimation, and simultaneous equations models are among the econometric methods used in this study, with a focus on dealing with the endogeneity of private equity ownership. We find that private equity ownership post initial public offering has a significant positive effect on the stock market return for the portfolio companies. We find no effect on return on assets or Tobin’s Q.
    [Show full text]