CONGRESSIONAL ]RE COD--1OUSE JANUARY 8 Ie Was an Inhabitant but He Could Not Vote

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CONGRESSIONAL ]RE COD--1OUSE JANUARY 8 Ie Was an Inhabitant but He Could Not Vote 1364 CONGRESSIONAL ]RE COD--1OUSE JANUARY 8 ie was an inhabitant but he could not vote. He met the back there. The proof tends to show he had expressed always qualifications for a Member of Congress, yet he could not vote the opinion and the conviction that he was still identified with in his own election. Massachusetts and had his citizenship there, and even as They are not the same at all, and I hope the House will not great an authority as John Quincy Adams himself certified to have that point disturbing their minds. Citizenship consists of that. He lived here for four years in a hotel and then he an aggregation of civil privileges. Inhabitancy depends en- married in the District of Columbia. He had never exercised tirely on where a man lives and has his ordinary home. the rights of citizenship here, and people could vote here at Mr. KINCHELOE. Will the gentleman yield? that time. He had never done anything to contradict his Mr. BROWNING. Yes. conviction, often expressed, that lie was still a citizen in full Air. KINCHELOE. Does the evidence disclose whether or standing of Massachusetts. He was elected to Congress one not Mr. BECK voted from the time lie rented this apartment in year after he had married and moved into the home of his Philadelphia until lie was elected to Congress? notler-in-law. They rejected him, and in the consideration Mr. BROWNING. Here is what the record shows: In May, of that case I want to read just this one statement: 1926, after it was determined that Mr. VAR was going to leave After reviewing the circumstances attending the adoption of the House, while Mr. BECK was in Europe, out of order on the the clause of tile Constitution, which I referred to a moment alphabetical list for assessment, Mr. BECK was listed exactly ago, the committee commented upon the fact that the word six months to a day before the election as a taxpayer for the "resident" had first been proposed but had been put aside for payment of this occupational tax of 25 cents. If a man has "inhabitant" as being a " stronger term, intended to express been a citizen of Peiisylvania, he call go back and resume his more clearly their intention that the persons to be elected should citizenship vith a six mionths' residence. He ignored that as- be completely identified with the State in which they were to be sessment. He was assessed twice in 1927, one time out of order, chosen." not on the regular alphalbetical list, but picked up out of order. Now, here is a definition which, I think, is really the summing He ignored the first one, but the second one he paid just 11 up of the definition of inhabitancy. days before the primary in which Air. Hazlett, who had been The SPEAKER pro tempore. The time of the gentleman elected to the House. was running for a county office. He voted from Tennessee has expired. in that primary on that poll-tax receipt, which was gotten as the Mr. BROWNING. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 10 minutes chairman has indicated, 11 days after its purchase. more. The law requires that the man shall either go to the office This is from Burrill's Law Dictionary: of the receiver of taxes and pay the poll tax himself or lie The Latin habitara, the root of this word, Imparts by Its very con- must pay it to a deputy at one of the registration places on struction frequency, constancy, permanency, closeness of connection, agent do it on written registration day, or he must have an attachment, both physical and moral; and the word " in " gives addi- authority from him. Mr. BECK had neither of these require- tional force to these senses. ments complied with. There was no intention on his part, I concede, to violate the la'w he is incapable of that; but I am Mr. DALLINGER. Air. Speaker, will the gentleman yield? asserting he had no right under the law to vote on that tax Ar. BROWNING. Yes. receipt in the primary election in September before he was Mr. DALLINGER. I understand that the gentleman is quot- elected in November. ing from Bouvier's Law Dictionary? Now, Mr. BEcK very properly calls my attention to a state- Air. BROWNING. No; from Burrill's. ment I made in the minority report to the effect that a man Mr. DALLINGER. I notice that you do not cite Bouvier's had to have his poll-tax receipt 30 days, I believe, before the Law Dictionary. election. If I am wrong I want to correct that, because he Mr. BROWNING. Oh, I am not willing to have the gentle- iasists that that does not apply to a primary. Since that time, man make my speech. when I told him I would correct it, I have gone further into the Mr. DALLINGER. Is the gentleman aware that in Bou- statute, and I confess I am not clear whether the law in Penn- vier's Law Dictionary the-statement is made that "inhabitant " sylvania in that regard applies to primaries or not; but I know as used in the Federal jurisdiction act of 1789 means citizen, that in the State of Pennsylvania the law is specific that before and there are two decisions of the Supreme Court confirming a man can vote he must be a resident for a certain length of that? time, and the court goes on to describe this residence by saying: Mr. BROWNING. I can cite the gentleman to cases from his An Illinois case decides that and true own State that will refute that. It means that place where the elector makes his permanent inhabitant is not synonymous with citizen. I will go on over his family residence, if home, his principal place of business, and he case. has one; where lie Intends to remain indefinitely, and without a present to a Massachusetts As used in the general statutes-section 11, paragraph 12--pro- to depart; when he leaves it he intends to return to it, and Intention viding that all personal estate within or without the State shall after his return he deems hinself at home. (71 Pa. 302.) be assessed to the owner in the city or town where lie is an This is a requirement for voting which Mr. BEcK never met inhabitant on the 1st day of May, "inhabitant" does not mean in the State of Pennsylvania. any man who may happen to be personally in a town or a city, Mr. GREEN. Will the gentleman yield? but means a man who has a home in a place, so any man who Mr. [ROWNING. Yes. established a permanent home for himself and family, if lie has Mr. GREEN. How many times during the 20 years of his one, and who there performs all the duties required of him. alleged residence in the city of Washington do the records There are a great many decisions, not only from the States disclose-that he voted in Pennsylvania, if any? of Illinois and Massachusetts, but from others, and this I get Mr. BROWNING. The first time he voted was in this pri- from the State of Delaware: mary in 1927, and that is the only time he had voted for 20 A man may be a citizen without being an inhabitant of the State, as- years in the State of Pennsylvania when this proof was taken. a nman may be an Inhabitant without being a citizen. This is not only Now, as to inhabitancy, in the Bailey election case from an obvious distinction, but one which the Constitution itself makes, as Massachusetts which the chairman referred to- in the qualiication of voters it requires both citizenship and residence. Mr. STEAGALL. Will the gentleman yield for one question? Mr. BROWNING. Yes. Here is another United States case: Mr. STEAGALL. Reference has been made to Air. BEcK's The term " inhabitant," as used in an act of Congress providing that membership in various clubs in the city of Philadelphia; did no civil suit slmill be brought before certain courts against an Inhabitant the committee ascertain whether or not he had membership of the United States by any original process In any other district than in clubs in Washington or elsewhere as well as in Philadelphia? that whereof he is an inhabitant or in which he shall be found at the Mr. BROWNING. Yes; I think he was a member of pos- time of serving the writ, is a mere equivalent description of citizen sibly one or two clubs in the city of Washington, but I will and alien. A person might be an inhabitant without being a citizen, and not be certain about that. But he always registered, when a citizen might be an inhabitant though he retain his citizenship. Alien- he registered away front the city of Washington, with his resi- age or citizenship is one thing and inhabitancy, by which is understood dence as Washington, D. C. He had all goods for his personal local residence, annimo manendi, quite another. comfort sent to his residence here on Twenty-first Street. Everything tended to show he considered this his home and That is in the case of Piquet v. Swan (U. S. 19 Fed. Cas. 609, abode and, in reality, it was. There is no question about that 613). in my mind. I cite another from Fifth Federal: Now, as to inhabitancy, in this Bailey case that has been "Inhabitant," as used in Civ.
Recommended publications
  • Mandatory Minimum Penalties and Statutory Relief Mechanisms
    Chapter 2 HISTORY OF MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES AND STATUTORY RELIEF MECHANISMS A. INTRODUCTION This chapter provides a detailed historical account of the development and evolution of federal mandatory minimum penalties. It then describes the development of the two statutory mechanisms for obtaining relief from mandatory minimum penalties. B. MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES IN THE EARLY REPUBLIC Congress has used mandatory minimum penalties since it enacted the first federal penal laws in the late 18th century. Mandatory minimum penalties have always been prescribed for a core set of serious offenses, such as murder and treason, and also have been enacted to address immediate problems and exigencies. The Constitution authorizes Congress to establish criminal offenses and to set the punishments for those offenses,17 but there were no federal crimes when the First Congress convened in New York in March 1789.18 Congress created the first comprehensive series of federal offenses with the passage of the 1790 Crimes Act, which specified 23 federal crimes.19 Seven of the offenses in the 1790 Crimes Act carried a mandatory death penalty: treason, murder, three offenses relating to piracy, forgery of a public security of the United States, and the rescue of a person convicted of a capital crime.20 One of the piracy offenses specified four different forms of criminal conduct, arguably increasing to 10 the number of offenses carrying a mandatory minimum penalty.21 Treason, 17 See U.S. Const. art. I, §8 (enumerating powers to “provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States” and to “define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations”); U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HSCA Volume IX: V. Possible Associations
    1040 xv. Irwin Signey Weiner Biographical Summar-y (1341) Irwin Signey Weiner was born on March 6, 1916, in Chicago, Ill ., the son of Leon Weiner, a bookmaker who was shot to death in it murder-suicide incident in Chicago. 1Veiner has been described as 5 feet 51;2 inches, 160 pounds, stocky with blue eyes and brown hair. Iii 1970, he was residing in -Niles. Ill. He had never served in the mili- tary and had no felony record. (2204.) (1 :342) Weiner's connections to organized crime were a dominant, if not pervasive, eienient in his life, and they included both direct ;inks to the highest levels of organized crime nationally and in Chi- cago, and less definitive relationships with seemingly legitimate activi- ies. In a Washington Post article; he was characterized as follows . Irwin Weiner is thought to be the underworld's major financial figure in the Midwest." (2205) Almost all documentation concerning Weiner contains references to known organized crime members, and a comprehensive list of his associates would include a significant num- ber of the major organized crime figures in the United States. (2206) Trcat»z~e)it by the ll'a1 ,relt ConzIyiissioib (1343) The only reference to Irwin Weiner by the Warren Commis- sion occurs in the Commission's examination ofV Jack Ruby's telephone records; which indicated a call from Ruby to IV, einer (Chicago num- ber SH 3-6865) on October 26, 1960'. (2207) Ruby was never questioned about this call ; Weiner was never questioned at all . This omission is consistent with the Commission's overall failure to investigate possible organized crime connections.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Criminal Law: the Eedn , Not for Revised Constitutional Theory Or New Congressional Statutes, but the Exercise of Responsible Prosecutive Discretion G
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 46 | Issue 4 Article 10 1-1995 Federal Criminal Law: The eedN , Not for Revised Constitutional Theory or New Congressional Statutes, But the Exercise of Responsible Prosecutive Discretion G. Robert Blakey Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation G. Robert Blakey, Federal Criminal Law: The Need, Not for Revised Constitutional Theory or New Congressional Statutes, But the Exercise of Responsible Prosecutive Discretion, 46 Hastings L.J. 1175 (1995). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol46/iss4/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Federal Criminal Law: The Need, Not for Revised Constitutional Theory or New Congressional Statutes, But the Exercise of Responsible Prosecutive Discretion by G. ROBERT BLAKEY* The safety of the people is the Supreme law.** Introduction Justice Frankfurter put it well: "In law.., the right answer usu- ally depends on putting the right question."' My basic point is that major aspects of systems of legal justice deal with antisocial behavior. That an aspect of these systems may be categorized as "criminal," "civil," "state," "federal," or "international," is relevant principally to a question of legal theory or governmental organization, which is fun- damentally secondary to the character of the behavior itself.2 In short, we have to look at the behavior first-and only then ask ques- * William J.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Criminal Law: the Eedn , Not for Revised Constitutional Theory Or New Congressional Statutes, but the Exercise of Responsible Prosecutive Discretion G
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 1995 Federal Criminal Law: The eedN , Not for Revised Constitutional Theory or New Congressional Statutes, But the Exercise of Responsible Prosecutive Discretion G. Robert Blakey Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation G. R. Blakey, Federal Criminal Law: The Need, Not for Revised Constitutional Theory or New Congressional Statutes, But the Exercise of Responsible Prosecutive Discretion, 46 Hastings L.J. 1175 (1994-1995). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/784 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Federal Criminal Law: The Need, Not for Revised Constitutional Theory or New Congressional Statutes, But the Exercise of Responsible Prosecutive Discretion by G. ROBERT BLAKEY* The safety of the people is the Supreme law.** Introduction Justice Frankfurter put it well: "In law.., the right answer usu- ally depends on putting the right question."' My basic point is that major aspects of systems of legal justice deal with antisocial behavior. That an aspect of these systems may be categorized as "criminal," "civil," "state," "federal," or "international," is relevant principally to a question of legal theory or governmental organization, which is fun- damentally secondary to the character of the behavior itself.2 In short, we have to look at the behavior first-and only then ask ques- * William J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Papers of Daniel Webster, Legal Papers, Volume 3
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Constitutional Commentary 1991 Book Review: The aP pers of Daniel Webster, Legal Papers, Volume 3: The edeF ral Practice. Andrew J. King Editor. James W. Ely Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ely Jr., James W., "Book Review: The aP pers of Daniel Webster, Legal Papers, Volume 3: The eF deral Practice. Andrew J. King Editor." (1991). Constitutional Commentary. 446. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/concomm/446 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Constitutional Commentary collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 246 CONSTITUTIONAL COMMENTARY [Vol. 8:246 THE PAPERS OF DANIEL WEBSTER, LEGAL PA­ PERS, VOLUME 3: THE FEDERAL PRACI'ICE. An­ drew J. King 1 editor. Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New England. 1989. Pp. xxxi, 1098. $110.00. James W. Ely, Jr. 2 Daniel Webster's long and distinguished legal career has been chronicled by numerous scholars.3 Appearing before the Supreme Court in about two hundred cases, Webster did much to shape con­ stitutional thought in the antebellum era. Few would dispute Web­ ster's place among the foremost legal advocates in American history. Ably edited by Professor Andrew J. King, The Papers of Daniel Webster: The Federal Practice offers a new perspective on Webster's achievements. Encompassing both private and constitu­ tional litigation, this volume contains a wealth of material concern­ ing Webster's participation in federal litigation between his first Supreme Court argument in an 1814 prize case and his last case shortly before his death in 1852.
    [Show full text]
  • Docid-32287836.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com JFK Assassination System Date: 517/20 15 Identification Form ---------------------------------------------------------------------------L~~~~a=~~ ~~~~~ -~ ~ -=:-_::. :=- ~=::-.::-:: =.-- Agency Information AGENCY : FBI RJ;:CORD NUMBER : 124-10198-10112 - -.- =.>:: -=- ==) • a-:.e:: ----c-:2 .:-- RECORD SERIES : HQ AGENCY FILE NUMBER: 92-3171-1887 Document Information ORIGINATOR : FBI FROM: DIRECTOR, FBI TO: TITLE: DATE : 09/06/1966 'PAGES : 40 SUBJECTS: SGI, ADVICE, ACT, ASSOC, OC DOCUMENT TYPE : PAPER, TEXTUAL DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION :­ Unclassified RESTRICTIONS : Consulted; 4; 10(a)2; ll(a) CURRENTSTATUS: Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW : 0110611999 OPENING CRITERIA : APPROVAL OF IRS, RCMP, INDEFINITE COMMENTS: REFERRED TO RCMP v9 .1 156 NW 45792 Docid: 32.287836 P.age 1 ····--·-·-·-- • •c--.;;....~~~~~-~... .....,--·--·----~-------------------------.,....,.--- . ' ' c· . · During the investigation of the cri~inal influence in· "'!r' fS~'] "[· . International Hod Carriers, Building and Comriion Laborers Union, ': ·®.C:~1\~ .· · #1, 3942 West Madison St., Chicago, Ill. (92-7325)., a review of the - -, Chicago .PD files showed that J.os'eph Aiello and James Caporale attended the wake' of Sam Giancana 1 s wife i·n June, 1955. ' .CG . 6443-C, on 9/9/51, reported .that Caporale was · reportedly taking orders from Charles . Nicolletti as. well as from Giancana. • {11} . It was noted that Niop;Lletti was one of Giancana 's top ranking lieutenants in the Chicago criminal hierarchy, while Caporale and Aie.llo were Financial· Secretary ~nd Vice-President Business Agent re- specti ve~y of 'the above local.
    [Show full text]
  • Docid-32263255.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com JFK Assa&<~ination System Date: 10/6/201 Identification Fonn Agency Infonnation AGENCY: HSCA Released under the John RECORD NUMBER : 180-10109-10350 l<. Kennedy ~ssassination Records RECORD SERIES: NUMBERED FILES ~ollection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Note) . AGENCY FlLE NUMBER: 014220 ~ase#:NW 54653 Date: ~0-23-2017 Docwnent Infonnation ORIGINATOR: CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM: TO: TITLE: DATE: 05/22/1978 PAGES: 21 SUBJECI'S: CAIN, RICHARD CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT RUBY, JACK; BACKGROUND; ASSOCIATES GIANCANN, SAM LANSKY, MEYERS FBI; FILES DOCUMENT 1YPE: REPORT CLASSIFICATION : Unclassified RES1RICTIONS : 3 CURRENT STATUS : Redact DATE OF LAST REVIEW: 03/05/1998 OPENING CRITERIA : COMMENI'S : 252-2. Box 252. ~ 1 NW 54653 Docld:32263255 Page 1 CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT FILES 5/22/78 FILE REVIEW OF P.O. SUMMARIES ... A. Guiseppe Cotroni 014220 Files News Clip; Vol. 6, p. 3; 7/9/59 GC Arrested in Montreal on Federal indictment in Chicago File 22.3, p. 5; 7/19/60 GC named as conspirator in inter-state stolen bond case with Rene Robert, Geo. Rosden File 223. p. 25; 1/12/62 news clip Article on arrest of FNU Martin, burglar in $18.5 million hei.tof bonds, cash, and jewels in Montreal; his arrest led to surveillance on GC, "reputed Mafia boss of Canada." When GC was arrested by Mounties he had 16 pounds of heroin on him.
    [Show full text]
  • Liiiiilliiill STREET ANQNUMBER: 26 Winter Street CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: Salem
    American Political $ Military Affairs, 1828-60. Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (Rev. 6-72) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Massachusetts COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Salem INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ENTRY DATE (Type all entries complete applicable sections) Joseph Story House AND/OR HISTORIC: Joseph Story House liiiiilliiill STREET ANQNUMBER: 26 Winter Street CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: Salem Massachusetts Essex CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC n District jfc] Building EH Public Public Acquisition: H Occupied Yes: CD Restricted Q Site Q Structure K) Private || In Process II Unoccupied | | Unrestricted D Object D Both | | Being Considered I I Preservation work in progresr JO No PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) l~] Agricultural [ I Government D Park I I Transportation I I Comments [~~] Commercial Q Industrial [ I Private Residence D Other (Specify; f~] Educational Q Military Q Religious [~] Entertainment Q Museum [ | Scientific OWNER'S NAME: Attorney and Mrs. John Wallace Ward STREET AND NUMBER: 26 Winter Street CITY OR TOWN: STATE: Salem Massachusetts COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Register of Deeds STREET AND NUMBER: 32 Federal Street Cl TY OR TOWN: Salem Massachusetts TITLE OF SURVEY: None DATE OF SURVEY: || Federal State County Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: STREET AND NUMBER: CITY OR TOWN: (Check One) d Good Q Fair Q Deteriorated HH Ruins O Unexposed CONDITION (Check One) (Check One) Altered \~\ Unaltered Moved 3£$ Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (if known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Story House is rated in the highest category for preservation in the Salem Historic District Study Commission's Investigation, Vol.IIa, prepared by Elizabeth K.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdiction Over Federal Areas Within the States
    JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATES REPORT OF THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY OF JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATES PART II A Text of the Law of Legislative Jurisdiction Submitted to the Attorney General and transmitted to the President June 1957 Reprinted by Constitutional Research Associates P.O. Box 550 So. Holland, Illinois 06473 INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY OF JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL AREAS WITHIN THE STATES PERRY W. MORTON, Assistant Attorney General, Chairman ROBERT DECHERT,[1] General Counsel, Department of Defense, Vice Chairman HENRY H. PIKE,[2] Associate General Counsel, General Services Administration, Secretary ARTHUR B. FOCKE, Legal Adviser, Bureau of the Budget ELMER F. BENNETT,[3] Solicitor, Department of the Interior ROBERT L. FARRINGTON, General Counsel, Department of Agriculture PARKE M. BANTA, General Counsel, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare GUY H. BIRDSALL,[4] General Counsel, Veterans' Administration Staff Director EDWARD S. LAZOWSKA, Department of Justice Principal Assistants, Part II ROBERT W. GEWEKE, Department of Justice HAROLD HAM, Department of Agriculture Principal Staff, Part II BERNARD M. NEWBURG, Department of the Interior THOMAS A. PACE, Department of Justice CHARLES S. SULLIVAN, Department of Justice HERMAN WOLKINSON, Department of Justice Staff Department of Justice: HELEN BUCKLEY, Tax Division CALVIN W. DERRENGER, Office of Deputy Attorney General ALICE MILLER, Internal Security Division CLARE LUND, Lands Division ALICE B. BRIGHT, Lands Division [1] Succeeded MANSFIELD D. SPRAGUE On February 28, 1957, who had succeeded Wilber M. Brucker on October 13, 1955. [2] Succeeded MAXWELL H. ELLIOTT on August 27, 1956. [3] Succeeded J. REUEL ARMSTRONG on May 3, 1957.
    [Show full text]
  • Due Process Abroad
    Copyright 2017 by Nathan S. Chapman Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 112, No. 3 Article DUE PROCESS ABROAD Nathan S. Chapman ABSTRACT—Defining the scope of the Constitution’s application outside U.S. territory is more important than ever. In February, the Supreme Court heard oral argument about whether the Constitution applies when a U.S. officer shoots a Mexican teenager across the border. At the same time, federal courts across the country scrambled to evaluate the constitutionality of an Executive Order that, among other things, deprived immigrants of their right to reenter the United States. Yet the extraterritorial reach of the Due Process Clause—the broadest constitutional limit on the government’s authority to deprive persons of “life, liberty, or property”—remains obscure. Up to now, scholars have uniformly concluded that the founding generation did not understand due process to apply abroad, at least not to aliens. This Article challenges that consensus. Based on the historical background, constitutional structure, and the early practice of federal law enforcement on the high seas, this Article argues that the founding generation understood due process to apply to any exercise of federal law enforcement, criminal or civil, against any person anywhere in the world. Outside the context of war, no one believed that a federal officer could deprive a suspect of life, liberty, or property without due process of law— even if the capture occurred abroad or the suspect was a noncitizen. This history supports generally extending due process to federal criminal and civil law enforcement, regardless of the suspect’s location or citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • 75 Years of Criminal Investigation History
    DOWNLOADED FROM: Family Guardian Website http://famguardian.org Download our free book: The Great IRS Hoax: Why We Don’t Owe Income Tax TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................5 Foreword ........................................................................................... 7 Profdes .............................................................................................. 9 History of the Intelligence Unit, 1919-1936 Organization and Functions of the Intelligence Unit .................... 23 Tax F:vasion Investigations .......................................................... 27 Dishonest Public Officials Pmsccuted as Tax Evaders ................28 Leading Gangsters Sent to Penitentiary 33 Motion Picture Stars Investigated- Several Million Dollars Collected 447 TzEvasion Cases Involving Prominent Individuals and Businesa Concerns 48 Women Tax Evaders Involvcd in Outstanding Fraud Cases ............................................................ 55 Aliens Seek to Evade Taxes - Treasury Recovers Many Millions in This Class of Tax Dodging ......................................... 57 Investigations of Offen in Compromise Result in Detecting Concealment of Assets 59 Miscellaneous Tax Investigations ................................................ 61 Record of Investigations of Revenue Personnel, Tax Accountantsand Enrolled Agents ......................................... 62 Indirect Results of Investigations - Fear of Prnalties and Punishment Deter Luge
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Times and the Astonishing Relevance of Kent Newmyer
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Connecticut Law Review School of Law 2021 Joseph Story’s Republics in a Minor Key: Dark Times and the Astonishing Relevance of Kent Newmyer Steven Wilf University of Connecticut School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review Part of the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation Wilf, Steven, "Joseph Story’s Republics in a Minor Key: Dark Times and the Astonishing Relevance of Kent Newmyer" (2021). Connecticut Law Review. 460. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/law_review/460 CONNECTICUT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 52 FEBRUARY 2021 NUMBER 4 Essay Joseph Story’s Republics in a Minor Key: Dark Times and the Astonishing Relevance of Kent Newmyer STEVEN R. WILF Kent Newmyer’s biography of Justice Joseph Story set the standard of later judicial biographies. Yet it focused on the public aspects of republicanism in Story’s court decisions rather than the ways a republican ethos might lead to the construction of alternative realms. Such realms became increasingly important as the common republicanism of the founding generation waned. In response to Jeffersonian and, especially, Jacksonian partisan politics, Story began to carve out space to invent domains apart from the politicized spheres of Supreme Court decision-making. It was Story’s adaptation to what he considered dark times. This Article examines three of these parallel worlds—his construction of a saltwater jurisprudence through admiralty law that proved a separate realm from the Court’s common law cases, his lengthy poetic imagining of a solitary place apart from politics, and his encouragement of mechanic republicanism through patent law and his involvement with mechanical institutes.
    [Show full text]