DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY South Selmon Expressway (SR 618) from Himes Avenue to Whiting Street

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY South Selmon Expressway (SR 618) from Himes Avenue to Whiting Street DRAFT Preliminary Engineering Report TAMPA HILLSBOROUGH EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY South Selmon Expressway (SR 618) from Himes Avenue to Whiting Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study Hillsborough County, Florida Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority Number: HI-0112 Efficient Transportation Decision Making (ETDM) Number: N/A Draft Preliminary Engineering Report Contents 1.0 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Project Description ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Related Projects ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1. South Selmon Safety Project ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.2. Selmon Extension ............................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3. Whiting PD&E Study ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.4. East Selmon PD&E Study ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.4. Commitments ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.1. Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.2. Natural Resources .............................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4.3. Highway Traffic Noise ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.4. Contamination ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.5. Description of the Preferred Alternative............................................................................................................. 7 2.0 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.1. Existing Roadway Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.1.1. Roadway Classification ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2. Typical Section .................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.3. Right-of-Way ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.4. Pavement Type and Condition ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.5. Design and Posted Speed Limit .................................................................................................................... 9 2.1.6. Horizontal and Vertical Alignments ............................................................................................................ 9 2.1.7. Multi-modal Facilities ..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.8. Access Classification, Interchanges and Intersections ....................................................................... 15 2.1.9. Traffic DataDRAFT ......................................................................................................................................................... 21 2.1.10. Roadway Operational Conditions .............................................................................................................. 30 2.1.11. Crash Data ........................................................................................................................................................... 35 2.1.12. Railroad Crossings ........................................................................................................................................... 36 2.1.13. Drainage System .............................................................................................................................................. 36 i Draft Preliminary Engineering Report 2.1.14. Floodplain ........................................................................................................................................................... 41 2.1.15. Lighting ................................................................................................................................................................ 41 2.1.16. Existing Intelligent Transportation Systems ........................................................................................... 42 2.1.17. Utilities ................................................................................................................................................................. 42 2.1.18. Soils Classifications .......................................................................................................................................... 44 2.1.19. Aesthetic Features ............................................................................................................................................ 47 2.1.20. Traffic Signs ........................................................................................................................................................ 47 2.1.21. Adjacent Land Use ........................................................................................................................................... 47 2.2. Existing Structure Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 49 2.2.1. Bridge Information .......................................................................................................................................... 49 2.2.2. Span Arrangement ........................................................................................................................................... 51 2.2.3. Horizontal and Vertical Clearances ........................................................................................................... 55 2.2.4. Geotechnical Information ............................................................................................................................. 56 2.2.5. Historical Significance .................................................................................................................................... 58 2.2.6. Bridges over Water .......................................................................................................................................... 58 2.2.7. Ship Impact Data .............................................................................................................................................. 58 2.3. Environmental Characteristics .............................................................................................................................. 58 2.3.1. Social Environment .......................................................................................................................................... 58 2.3.2. Cultural Environment ...................................................................................................................................... 58 2.3.3. Natural Environment ....................................................................................................................................... 59 2.3.4. Physical Environment ...................................................................................................................................... 59 3.0 Future Conditions Analysis .......................................................................................................... 60 3.1. Future Land Use and Context Classification .................................................................................................... 60 3.2. Future Transportation Demand ........................................................................................................................... 60 3.2.1. Alternatives Screening .................................................................................................................................... 60 3.2.2. Future TrafficDRAFT Volumes ................................................................................................................................... 61 3.2.3. Design Year (2046) Traffic Operational Analysis .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Application of Comcast Corporation, General Electric Company
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Application of Comcast Corporation, ) General Electric Company and NBC ) Universal, Inc., for Consent to Assign ) MB Docket No. 10-56 Licenses or Transfer Control of ) Licenses ) COMMENTS AND MERGER CONDITIONS PROPOSED BY ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNICATIONS DEMOCRACY James N. Horwood Gloria Tristani Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 879-4000 June 21, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PEG PROGRAMMING IS ESSENTIAL TO PRESERVING LOCALISM AND DIVERSITY ON BEHALF OF THE COMMUNITY, IS VALUED BY VIEWERS, AND MERITS PROTECTION IN COMMISSION ACTION ON THE COMCAST-NBCU TRANSACTION .2 II. COMCAST CONCEDES THE RELEVANCE OF AND NEED FOR IMPOSING PEG-RELATED CONDITIONS ON THE TRANSFER, BUT THE PEG COMMITMENTS COMCAST PROPOSES ARE INADEQUATE 5 A. PEG Merger Condition No.1: As a condition ofthe Comcast­ NBCU merger, Comcast should be required to make all PEG channels on all ofits cable systems universally available on the basic service tier, in the same format as local broadcast channels, unless the local government specifically agrees otherwise 8 B. PEG Merger Condition No.2: As a merger condition, the Commission should protect PEG channel positions .,.,.,.. ., 10 C. PEG Merger Condition No.3: As a merger condition, the Commission should prohibit discrimination against PEG channels, and ensure that PEG channels will have the same features and functionality, and the same signal quality, as that provided to local broadcast channels .,., ., ..,.,.,.,..,., ., ., .. .,11 D. PEG Merger Condition No.4: As a merger condition, the Commission should require that PEG-related conditions apply to public access, and that all PEG programming is easily accessed on menus and easily and non-discriminatorily accessible on all Comcast platforms ., 12 CONCLUSION 13 EXHIBIT 1 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tampa Center City Plan Connecting Our Neighborhoods and Our River for Our Future
    The Tampa Center City Plan Connecting Our Neighborhoods and Our River for Our Future The Tampa Center City Plan Connecting Our Neighborhoods and Our River for Our Future NOvembeR 2012 Prepared for: City of Tampa IMAGE PLACEHOLDER Prepared by: AECOM 150 North Orange Avenue Orlando, Florida 32801 407 843 6552 AECOM Project No. : 60250712 AECOM Contact : [email protected] In Collaboration With: Parsons Brinckerhoff The Leytham Group ChappellRoberts Blackmon Roberts Group MindMixer Crossroads Engineering Fowler White Boggs PA Stephanie Ferrell FAIA Architect Martin Stone Consulting, LLC © AeCOm Technical Services 2012 This document has been prepared by AeCOm on behalf of the City of Tampa, Florida. This project was made possible through a Sustainable Communities Challenge Grant provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Participation List City Team Workshop Participants bob buckhorn - Mayor Chris Ahern Duncan broyd David Crawley bruce earhart bob mcDonaugh - Economic Development Administrator Art Akins Rod brylawski Nelson Crawley Shannon edge Thomas Snelling - Planning & Development Director Catherine Coyle - Planning Manager Adjoa Akofio-Swah bob buckhorn Darryl Creighton Diane egner Randy Goers - Project Manager beth Alden Arnold buckley Jim Crews Chris elmore J.J. Alexander benjamin buckley Laura Crews michael english Consultant Team Albert Alfonso michelle buckley Daryl Croi maggie enncking Robert Allen Davis burdick Andrea Cullen James evans AECOM ChappellRoberts Joseph Alvarez Andy bushnell Wence Cunnigham
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the CITY OF TAMPA, FLORIDA for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2017 Bob Buckhorn Mayor Sonya C. Little Chief Financial Officer Prepared by the Department of Revenue and Finance Please visit us at https://www.tampagov.net Table of Contents INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting........... 11 Mayor of Tampa and Organization Chart................................................................................................................................. 13 Tampa City Council Members.................................................................................................................................................. 15 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report................................................................................................................................................... 19 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A)..................................................................................................................... 25 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position.................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citrus County
    LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT CITRUS COUNTY CITRUS COUNTY CITRUS COUNTY HERNANDO COUNTY HERNANDO COUNTY CITRUS COUNTY COUNTY, FLORIDA FGHGPUGUKHCP[VQKVQP2NCKPVKHHUŏCVVQTPG[ C(NQTKFC.KOKVGF.KCDKNKV[%QORCP[ FGEGFGPVŏUGUVCVGQPYJQOCEQR[QHVJKU PROBATE DIVISION Donald F. Perrin, Esq., DONALD F. PER- Plaintiff, PQVKEG KU TGSWKTGF VQ DG UGTXGF OWUV ſNG File No. 2020-CP- 000424 4+02#2QUV1HſEG$QZ+PXGTPGUU v. their claims with this court ON OR BEFORE (.YKVJKPHQTV[ FC[UCHVGT THE LATER OF 3 MONTHS AFTER THE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE Division Probate VJG ſTUV RWDNKECVKQP QH VJKU PQVKEG CPF ſNG LUIS E. DUMOIS and JOSEFA NUNEZ TIME OF THE FIRST PUBLICATION OF FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DE DUMOIS, IN RE: ESTATE OF the original with the Clerk of this Court ei- THIS NOTICE OR 30 DAYS AFTER THE CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA VJGTDGHQTGUGTXKEGQP2NCKPVKHHŏUCVVQTPG[QT Defendants. DATE OF SERVICE OF A COPY OF THIS GALE R. MORIN, CIVIL DIVISION KOOGFKCVGN[VJGTGCHVGTQVJGTYKUGCFGHCWNV NOTICE OF ACTION NOTICE ON THEM. Case Number: 2021CA00276A Deceased. YKNNDGGPVGTGFCICKPUV[QWHQTVJGTGNKGHFG- TO: LUIS E. DUMOIS and JOSEFA All other creditors of the decedent and OCPFGFKPVJG%QORNCKPV QVJGT RGTUQPU JCXKPI ENCKOU QT FGOCPFU HERBERT H. SHARPE and NOTICE TO CREDITORS NUNEZ DE DUMOIS, &#6'&VJKUVJFC[QH,WPG (Address Unknown) CICKPUV FGEGFGPVŏU GUVCVG OWUV ſNG VJGKT SALLY-ANNE SHARPE, The administration of the estate of claims with this court WITHIN 3 MONTHS Plaintiff, GALE R. MORIN, deceased, whose date ANGELA VICK Clerk of the Court YOU ARE NOTIFIED that an action to AFTER THE DATE OF THE FIRST PUB- v. QHFGCVJYCU,WPG(KNG0WODGT quiet title to the following described real LICATION OF THIS NOTICE.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Zones
    41688 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 136 / Monday, July 16, 2012 / Rules and Regulations Buffalo or his designated on-scene as a National Special Security Event. The purpose of this rule is to provide representative. The security zones are necessary to for the safety and security of convention (2) This safety zone is closed to all protect convention delegates, official delegates, official parties, dignitaries, vessel traffic, except as may be parties, dignitaries, the public, and and the public during the 2012 permitted by the Captain of the Port surrounding waterways from terrorist Republican National Convention. Buffalo or his designated on-scene acts, sabotage or other subversive acts, Discussion of Comments and Changes representative. accidents, or other causes of a similar (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of nature. Entering or remaining in any of The Coast Guard received one the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any the security zones is prohibited unless comment to the proposed rule from the Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or authorized by the Captain of the Port St. Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office. petty officer who has been designated Petersburg or a designated The comment requested to extend the by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act representative. No Wake/Security Zone south to the R. on his behalf. E. Knight pier. The extension of the DATES: (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter This rule is effective from 12:01 security zone would allow Law or operate within the safety zone shall p.m. on August 25, 2012 through 11:59 Enforcement officials to operate out of contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • YBOR CITY E 7T Investment Opportunity N 17Th Street TAMPA, FLORIDA
    Downtown Tampa Port Tampa Bay Selmon Expressway e h Av YBOR CITY E 7t Investment Opportunity N 17th Street TAMPA, FLORIDA PROPERTY e Av th E 8 Ang el Oliva Senior Street th Ave 9 E INVESTMENT SUMMARY Jason Donald Patrick Berman Todd Tolbert Steve Aiken Managing Director Managing Director Senior Associate Senior Financial Analyst +1 813 204 5329 +1 813 204 5363 +1 813 204 5350 +1 813 204 5333 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Cushman & Wakefield of Florida, LLC One Tampa City Center ©2018 Cushman & Wakefield The depiction in the included photograph of any person, entity, sign, logo or property, other than Cushman & Wakefield’s client and the property offered by Cushman & Wakefield, is incidental only, and is not intended to connote any affiliation, connection, association, sponsorship or approval by or between that which is incidentally depicted and Cushman & Wakefield or its client. This listing shall not be deemed an offer to lease, sublease or sell such property; and, in the event of any transaction for such property, Suite 3300 no commission shall be earned by or payable to any cooperating broker except if otherwise provided pursuant to the express terms, rates and conditions of Cushman & Wakefield’s agreement with its principal, if, as and when such commission (if any) is actually received from such principal. (A copy of the rates and conditions referred to above with respect to this property is available upon request.) Tampa, Florida 33602 INVESTMENT SUMMARY Cushman & Wakefield’s Retail Investment Advisors are pleased to offer for sale 1701-1715 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Neighborhood Guide to Cigar City
    TAMPA Your Neighborhood Guide to Cigar City Table Of Contents Welcome 3 City Map 4 Downtown 5 Channelside 6 Ybor City 7 South Tampa 8 Hyde Park / SoHo 9 Places to Visit 10 StayFrontdesk.com 2 Welcome to the Neighborhood JMKE Photography Hi there! My team and I are so happy to welcome you to our apartment! We also love to travel and have stayed in more than 100 Airbnb’s in more than 50 countries. Inspired by many of the wonderful stays we had, we began hosting people professionally here in Tampa in 2018. We believe new experiences build character and community, and we take pride in the personal touch we give each of our properties and guests. In this guidebook, we’ve compiled all the information that we’ve found valuable on our travels. We’re also just a call or text away if you’d like other personalized recommendations. It would be our pleasure, we want you to enjoy Milwaukee just as as much as we do! If there is anything at all that we can help you with during your stay, please don’t hesitate to reach out. Warmly, Jesse and the Frontdesk Team PHONE (text or call): 813-308-4109 • EMAIL: [email protected] MEDICAL EMERGENCY: 911 POISON CONTROL: 800-222-1222 StayFrontdesk.com 3 Neighborhood Map Downtown • Page 5 Westshore / Airport • Page 8 Part of the business district, upbeat This lively zone caters to both Tampa Downtown is known for its museums. International Airport travelers and fun-seeking This area is booming with family-friendly locals from the historic neighborhoods nearby, fun like the Aquarium, water sports and with a cluster of hotels, restaurants and easy parks to exciting nightlife, events, bars one-stop shopping via two massive malls and some of the beat restaurants.
    [Show full text]
  • Tampa‐Hillsborough County Expressway Authority Board
    Tampa‐Hillsborough County Expressway Authority Board Meeting Packet October 26, 2020 1104 E. Twiggs St. Tampa FL 33602 Meeting of the Board of Directors October 26, 2020 - 1:30 p.m. Due to the COVID-19, this meeting of the Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority (THEA) Board of Directors is a virtual meeting. If any person wishes to address the Board, please email [email protected]. If you wish to present, presentations must be limited to three (3) minutes and sent to the above email address by 4:00 p.m., October 21, 2020. Any person who decides to appeal any decisions of the Authority with respect to any matter considered at its meeting or public hearing will need a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to hire a court reporter to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which an appeal is to be based. I. Call to Order II. Public Input Presentations III. Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes of the September 21, 2020 Board of Directors Meeting B. Approval of Minutes of the October 12, 2020 Board Committee as a Whole Meeting C. HI-0125 GEC Support for Straddle Bent Structure analysis and RFP Development, HNTB, $55,000 IV. Discussion/Action Items A. Planning Committee – Shaun Oxtal, Chairman 1. US 301 Interchange plan - Attachment - Bob Frey, Staff Purpose: To perform a sketch analysis at the interchange at US 301 and the Selmon Expressway near the planned site of the new Coca Cola facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2: the Livable City Vision: Strategies That Get Us Ready for Change
    CHAPTER 2 Chapter 2: The Livable City Vision: Strategies that get us ready for Change Tampa’s future is one of change, stimulated by growth manifesting itself through redevelopment of our city. The Livable city plan acknowledges change must be accommodated within the existing urban structure that respects and preserves the fabric of existing residential neighborhoods. The seven strategies expressed in this Chapter, work towards shaping the city and future involve steering growth and change to specifi c parts of the city while strengthening and protecting our residential neighborhoods from development pressures. The Livable City Strategies work together to realize fi scal effi ciencies for the City of Tampa and other funding agencies and help achieve other public goals including effi cient transit. Strategy 1: Organizing Planning Districts - (Gett ing Transit Ready) The fi rst step to planning a framework is the establishment of Planning Districts. Districts connect and cohesively support the City’s continued health and success. The Vision Map illustrates the boundaries of fi ve districts: the Central Tampa, Westshore, University, New Tampa and South Tampa Districts. Each of these districts are a functional planning unit encompassing several square miles. They share a common identity, and include the city’s many assets such as regional economic engines, residential and business neighborhoods, parks and schools. The roles and relationships of one district to another district will guide the planning strategies that are most eff ective in supporting a strong economy and a livable city form; ensure a mix of employment and housing; utilize partnerships which promote community capacity building; enhance our identity; and ensure that infrastructure investments such as transit support the Livable City vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Title
    FOR SALE: ADAPTIVE REUSE AND REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY Ybor City Tampa, Florida 33605 Price: $750,000 Cascaden 15 North Park th th 17 Avenue 17th Ave Street J.C. Newman Design Style Cigar Factory Architecture Columbus Drive Academy 17 Prep Tampa TH ST Urban Apartments on Burger Mc- 12th King Donald’s The Quarter Hillsborough At Ybor Community College Property Information: Property Highlights: • Location: 1601 E. Columbus Drive • Site includes former Sanchez & Haya Real • Site Size: 38,430 square feet land Estate Company building, circa 1910 • Frontage: 315’ frontage E. Columbus Dr. • Located within Ybor City National Landmark 122’ frontage on N. 16th Street Historic District • Building Size: Two-stories, 14,858 total sf • Potential development incentives include: • Zoning: YC-5, General Commercial – Development waivers and exemptions Min. Lot Size: 4,700 sf, 50’ width – Historic preservation incentives Setbacks:Front 0 – Façade improvements grants Side 0 – Enterprise zone programs Back 10’ • Easy access to Interstates Max Height: 45’ (I-4 and I-275) and downtown Tampa Floor Area Ratio (FAR): 2.0 • Located directly across from America’s • Future Land Use: Community Mixed Use oldest family owned premium cigar makers, • Folio Numbers: J.C. Newman Cigar Company; the last • 197910, 197927, 197928 operating cigar factory in Cigar City. For more information, please contact: Jeannette Jason, CCIM Brian Breeding, CCIM 201 North Franklin Street Director Associate Suite 3300 +1 813 254 4900 +1 813 223 6300 Tampa, Florida 33602 [email protected] [email protected] phone: +1 813 223 6300 Cushman & Wakefield Copyright 2015. No warranty or representation, express or implied, is made to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and same is submitted subject to errors, omissions, change of price, rental or other conditions, withdrawal without notice, and to any special listing conditions imposed by the property owner(s).
    [Show full text]
  • 815-Water-St-Tampa.Pdf
    Lease plans CHANNELSIDE DR NOTES: *FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING SQUARE FOOTAGE, ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS (DOMINANT SURFACE), THE CENTERLINE OF DEMISING PARTITIONS AND THE OUTSIDE FACE OF DEMISING WALLS ADJOINING COMMON RETAIL AREAS. EXTERIOR TENANT AREAS BEHIND THE DOMINANT SURFACE (FACADE RECESSES) ARE INCLUDED IN THE AREA TOTAL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. VERTICAL PENETRATIONS FOR THE PRIVATE USE OF TENANTS (STAIRS & ELEVATORS) ARE INCLUDED IN THE AREA TOTAL ON THE GROUND FLOOR ONLY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 71'-0" **FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING TENANT SPACE PERIMETER FRONTAGE, MEASUREMENTS ARE FROM 89'-1" CENTERLINE OF DEMISING WALLS TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF THE STOREFRONT, INCLUDING ALL SIDES OF BAY 14'-7" WINDOWS AND FACADE RECESSES (PERIMETER). RETAIL 10'-11" 3,170 SF ***FOR THE PURPOSES OF MEASURING TENANT SPACE STREET FRONTAGE, MEASUREMENTS ARE THE LINEAR 10'-4" FRONTAGE OF THE RETAIL SUITE ALONG A STREET, NOT INCLUDING FACADE RECESSES, MEASURED FROM C-100 17'-0" 53'-6" 29'-5" CENTERLINES OF THE DEMISING WALLS. FOR MULTI-HEIGHT SPACES, STREET FRONTAGE IS ONLY COUNTED ONCE 19'-5" 10'11" 61'-7" PER LINEAR FOOT OF BUILDING FRONTAGE. 45'-11" ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY TENANT. KE NEITHER THE LANDLORD NOR ITS AGENTS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED, AND ANY 11'0" 17'-5" 71'-0" REPRESENTATION MADE OR LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREIN. THIS DOCUMENT IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION AND FFE APPROXIMATION PURPOSES ONLY. RETAIL KE TENANT’S REPRESENTATIVE, ARCHITECT, AND/OR ENGINEER ARE TO VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS, SIGHTLINES AND 2,007 SF ELEVATIONS IN FIELD.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Tampa Tree Canopy and Urban Forest Analysis 2016
    City of Tampa Tree Canopy and Urban Forest Analysis 2016 City of Tampa Tree Canopy and Urban Forest Analysis 2016 Final Report to the City of Tampa March 2018 Authors Dr. Shawn M. Landry, University of South Florida Dr. Andrew K. Koeser, University of Florida Robert J. Northrop, UF/IFAS Extension, Hillsborough County Drew McLean, University of Florida Dr. Geoffrey Donovan, U.S. Forest Service Dr. Michael G. Andreu, University of Florida Deborah Hilbert, University of Florida Project Contributors Jan Allyn, University of South Florida Kathy Beck, City of Tampa Catherine Coyle, City of Tampa Rich Hammond, University of South Florida Eric Muecke, City of Tampa Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne, University of Vermont Dr. Ruiliang Pu, University of South Florida Cody Winter, University of South Florida Quiyan Yu, University of South Florida Special Thanks Fredrick Hartless, Hillsborough County Landowners and residents of the City of Tampa City of Tampa Urban Forest Management Internal Technical Working Group City of Tampa Natural Resources Advisory Committee Citation for this report: Landry S., Koeser, A., Northrop, R., McLean, D., Donovan, G., Andreu, M. & Hilbert, D. (2018). City of Tampa Tree Canopy and Urban Forest Analysis 2016. Tampa, FL: City of Tampa, Florida. Contents Executive Summary �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 9 The Benefits of Trees ................................................................................. 14 Project Methods Study Area ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������17
    [Show full text]