Maryland Parkway High Capacity Transit Project Las Vegas, Nevada Environmental Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maryland Parkway High Capacity Transit Project Las Vegas, Nevada Environmental Assessment Maryland Parkway Environmental Assessment MARYLAND PARKWAY HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT PROJECT LAS VEGAS, NEVADA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 2018 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA Maryland Parkway Environmental Assessment This page left intentionally blank Maryland Parkway Environmental Assessment MARYLAND PARKWAY HIGH CAPACITY TRANSIT PROJECT LAS VEGAS, NEVADA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT November 2018 Prepared by U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration and Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada Pursuant to: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C § 4321 et seq.), as amended Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C § 5301 et seq.), as amended Title 23 U.S.C Highways Title 49 U.S.C Transportation Title 49 U.S.C § 303 (formally Department of Transportation Act of 1966), Section 4(f) Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) Executive Order 11988 (Floodplains Management) Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice) National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Section 106 (16 U.S.C § 407f et seq.) Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, or “FAST” Act (December 4, 2015) Maryland Parkway Environmental Assessment This page left intentionally blank Maryland Parkway Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT ................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Project Location and Setting .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Planning Background .............................................................................................................. 1-8 1.3 Corridor Vision ...................................................................................................................... 1-11 1.4 Project Need ......................................................................................................................... 1-11 1.5 Project Purpose .................................................................................................................... 1-15 2.0 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Alternatives Previously Considered ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Locally Preferred Alternative Refinement during Environmental Assessment .................... 2-2 2.3 Alternatives to be Evaluated During Environmental Assessment ...................................... 2-35 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION ........................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Land Use ............................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2 Socioeconomics .................................................................................................................. 3-22 3.3 Environmental Justice ......................................................................................................... 3-30 3.4 Visual Resources ................................................................................................................. 3-34 3.5 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................. 3-48 3.6 Water Resources and Water Quality .................................................................................. 3-73 3.7 Floodplains and Hydrologic Assessment ............................................................................ 3-78 3.8 Soils and Geology ................................................................................................................ 3-79 3.9 Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................................... 3-80 3.10 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................... 3-85 3.11 Noise and Vibration ............................................................................................................ 3-89 3.12 Safety and Security ........................................................................................................... 3-107 3.13 Wetlands and Jurisdictional Wetlands ............................................................................. 3-109 3.14 Biological Resources ......................................................................................................... 3-110 3.15 Section 4(f) ........................................................................................................................ 3-114 3.16 Climate Change ................................................................................................................. 3-117 3.17 Cumulative Impacts .......................................................................................................... 3-120 4.0 TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND MITIGATION .................................................................................4-1 4.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Impacts ............................................................................................................................... 4-12 4.3 Mitigation ........................................................................................................................... 4-16 i-1 Maryland Parkway Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 5.0 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT .......................................................5-1 5.1 Public Outreach Program Strategy ....................................................................................... 5-2 5.2 Public Invement Summary .................................................................................................... 5-3 6.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................6-1 7.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ..........................................................................................................7-1 TABLES Page ES-1 Maryland Parkway Environmental Assessment Evaluation Summary .................................... ES-3 ES-2 Technology Screening Analysis ................................................................................................ ES-8 ES-3 Maryland Parkway Proposed Mitigation Measures .............................................................. ES-12 ES-4 Permits Required for the Build Alternatives .......................................................................... ES-20 1.1-1 Maryland Parkway Corridor Population and Employment 2014-2040 ..................................... 1-8 2.2-1 Las Vegas Downtown and Medical District Population and Employment ................................ 2-5 2.2-2 Technology Screening Analysis ................................................................................................ 2-11 2.2-3 Side- versus Center-running Configuration Analysis ............................................................... 2-18 2.2-4 Initial Locally Preferred Alternative and Locally Preferred Alternative Capital and Operation and Maintenance Costs ........................................................................................................... 2-23 2.2-5 Maryland Parkway Corridor Capital Cost Estimates ................................................................ 2-27 2.2-6 Maryland Parkway Corridor Escalated Capital Costs at 3.5 Percent per Year ......................... 2-28 2.2-7 Operating Plan Variables ......................................................................................................... 2-30 2.2-8 Cost Model Input Variables ..................................................................................................... 2-30 2.2-9 LRT and BRT Estimated Operation and Maintenance Costs .................................................... 2-31 3-1 Maryland Parkway Environmental Assessment Evaluation Summary……………………………………3-2 3.1-1 Existing Land Use: Maryland Parkway Corridor Study Area ..................................................... 3-5 3.1-2 Existing Zoning for the City of Las Vegas in Maryland Parkway Corridor ................................ 3-11 3.1-3 Existing Zoning for Clark County in Maryland Parkway Corridor ............................................ 3-12 3.1-4 Potential Property Acquisitions for the Build Alternatives ..................................................... 3-16 3.5-1 Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites Within the Study Area ......................................... 3-54 3.5-2 Summary of Property Types more than 45 Years of Age in the APE ....................................... 3-56 3.5-3 Intensively-Surveyed Historic Properties within the Area of Potential Effect ........................ 3-57 3.9-1 Documented Hazardous Waste Releases in the Maryland Parkway Corridor that Remain on the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Active List ........................................... 3-83 3.10-1 National and Nevada Ambient Air Quality Standards ............................................................
Recommended publications
  • World War II Era Residential Housing in Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada (1940–1945)
    World War II Era Residential Housing in Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada (1940–1945) HPF Tracking No.: P14AS00012(3) Prepared for: The city of Las Vegas Development Services Center and Historic Preservation Commission Prepared by: Greta J. Rayle, M.A., RPA and Helana Ruter, M.A. Logan Simpson 3753 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 235 Las Vegas, NV 89169 June 2015 LSD Technical Report No. 145648 The archival research and windshield survey of historic properties that is the subject of this historic context on World War II era residential housing in the city of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada has been financed in whole or part with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, and administered by the State Historic Preservation Office. The contents and opinions, however, do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or the State Historic Preservation Office. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Chief, Office of Equal Opportunity Programs, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street, NW (2740), Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Letter to Nevada State Historic
    Las Vegas Metroplex Section 106 Consultation Attachment A: Location of the Revised Area of Potential Effect (Based on the Reportable Noise Grid Points) Lincoln LEGEND Evenly-Spaced Grid Centroid Exposed to a DNL 45 to 60 dB with a DNL 5 dB Nye Increase 93 ¤£ Area of Potential Effect ¤£95 General Study Area Boundary 15 Z Study Airports Nevada ¨¦§ US and Interstate Highways Inyo State Boundary KVGT Water Clark ¨¦§515 General Study Area Counties KLAS ¨¦§515 Arizona Counties KHND California Counties Nevada Counties ¤£93 Mohave Arizona ¤£95 ¨¦§15 40 California ¨¦§ 15 ¨¦§ ¤£93 San Bernardino 15 15 ¨¦§ ¨¦§ ¤£95 Notes: 40 ¨¦§ KHND Henderson Executive Airport KLAS Mc Carran International Airport KLSV Nellis Air Force Base ¨¦§40 KVGT North Las Vegas Airport ¤£95 Coordinate System: GCS WGS 1984 Datum: WGS 1984 Scale: 1:1,392,546 010205 Miles ± Document Path: D:\Documents-Data\OAPM\LAS\Exhibits\Chapter 5\Exhibit_5_1.mxd Sources: Road Network File, U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 (2017 TIGER/Line Shapefiles (machine-readable data files), County Boundary File, US Census Bureau, (2017 TIGER/Line Shapefiles (machine-readable data files); World Imagery, Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community.Airports file, Federal Aviation Administration, 2018 Coded Instrument Flight Procedures (CIFP). Shaded Relief, 2018. ATAC Corporation, 2018, (2018 General Study Area boundary). Prepared by: ATAC Corporation, November 2019. Attachment A Las Vegas Metroplex Section 106 Consultation Attachment
    [Show full text]
  • Assembly Assembly Committee on Government Affairs-3/19/2019
    MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS Eightieth Session March 19, 2019 The Committee on Government Affairs was called to order by Chair Edgar Flores at 9:02 a.m. on Tuesday, March 19, 2019, in Room 4100 of the Legislative Building, 401 South Carson Street, Carson City, Nevada. The meeting was videoconferenced to Room 4406 of the Grant Sawyer State Office Building, 555 East Washington Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada. Copies of the minutes, including the Agenda (Exhibit A), the Attendance Roster (Exhibit B), and other substantive exhibits, are available and on file in the Research Library of the Legislative Counsel Bureau and on the Nevada Legislature's website at www.leg.state.nv.us/App/NELIS/REL/80th2019. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Assemblyman Edgar Flores, Chair Assemblyman William McCurdy II, Vice Chair Assemblyman Alex Assefa Assemblywoman Shannon Bilbray-Axelrod Assemblyman Richard Carrillo Assemblywoman Bea Duran Assemblyman John Ellison Assemblywoman Michelle Gorelow Assemblyman Gregory T. Hafen II Assemblywoman Melissa Hardy Assemblyman Glen Leavitt Assemblywoman Susie Martinez Assemblywoman Connie Munk COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: None GUEST LEGISLATORS PRESENT: Assemblywoman Heidi Swank, Assembly District No. 16 Minutes ID: 555 *CM555* Assembly Committee on Government Affairs March 19, 2019 Page 2 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jered McDonald, Committee Policy Analyst Connie Jo Smith, Committee Secretary Trinity Thom, Committee Assistant OTHERS PRESENT: Kathy Clewett, Legislative Liaison, City of Sparks Brian McAnallen, representing City of North Las Vegas David Cherry, Government Affairs Manager, City of Henderson Charles Donohue, Administrator, Division of State Lands; and State Lands Registrar, State Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Shani J.
    [Show full text]
  • NEVADA Historic Preservation Plan 2020-2028
    NEVADA HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN 2020-2028 Nevada Preservation Plan 2020-2028 1 Nevada Historic Preservation Plan Nevada’s Comprehensive Statewide 2020-2028 Historic Preservation Plan Published by the State Historic Preservation Office 901 S. Stewart St. Suite 5004 Carson City, NV 89701 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS shpo.nv.gov This Plan was made possible through the input of citizens, state and federal preservation partners, Certified Local Governments: Reno, Carson City, Las Vegas, and Storey County, Native American Tribes, and the State Historic Preservation Office Staff. Our preservation colleagues and members of the public who participated in the planning effort share credit for this plan. Their comments on the current state of historic preservation in Nevada, as well as the recommendations they provided for the future of preservation helped guide the development of our vision, goals, objectives, and strategies. These comments were vital in ensuring we develop a plan that addresses the preservation issues that are most important to citizens of the Silver State. We would like to extend our gratitude to those that participated by providing public comments. We wish to extend a special thanks to the six cities, state agencies, local governments, and organizations and their staff that hosted statewide preservation planning meetings in 2018: the City of Ely and the East Ely Railroad Depot Museum, the City of Elko and the Great Basin College, the City of Reno and the McKinley Arts & Culture Center, the Town of Tonopah and the Tonopah Convention Center, Douglas County and the Douglas County Senior Center, and the City of Las Vegas and the state employees at the 4747 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Parkway Public Outreach Program
    MARYLAND PARKWAY HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT PROJECT LAS VEGAS, NEVADA PUBLIC AND AGENCY OUTREACH PROGRAM Prepared by Parsons Prepared for Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) August 2018 This page is intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT GOALS ................................................................................................................................... 2 4.0 PUBLIC OUTREACH PROGRAM STRATEGY .................................................................................................. 3 5.0 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 5 Attachments A Public Scoping Meeting Written and Verbal Comments B Maryland Parkway Coalition Meetings C Intent‐to‐Study Letter and Distribution List D Agency Correspondence Letters E Draft EA Public and Agency Review Comments i This page is intentionally left blank. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Maryland Parkway is one of the Las Vegas Valley’s most established and well‐used corridors. Over the years, this roadway has seen many changes along its route and boasts an eclectic blend of socio‐ economically diversified residents, educational and health facilities, and businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Frommer's Las Vegas 2004
    Las Vegas 2004 by Mary Herczog Here’s what the critics say about Frommer’s: “Amazingly easy to use. Very portable, very complete.” —Booklist “Detailed, accurate, and easy-to-read information for all price ranges.” —Glamour Magazine “Hotel information is close to encyclopedic.” —Des Moines Sunday Register “Frommer’s Guides have a way of giving you a real feel for a place.” —Knight Ridder Newspapers About the Author Mary Herczog lives in Los Angeles and works in the film industry. She is the author of Frommer’s New Orleans, California For Dummies, Frommer’s Portable Las Vegas for Non-Gamblers, and Las Vegas For Dummies, and has contributed to Frommer’s Los Angeles. She still isn’t sure when to hit and when to hold in blackjack. Published by: Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030 Copyright © 2004 Wiley Publishing, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or trans- mitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, record- ing, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8700. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd. Indianapolis, IN 46256, (317) 572-3447, fax (317) 572-4447, E-Mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Huntridge Theater______Other Names/Site Number Httntridge Performing Arts- Tfieater______
    NFS Form 10-900 ; OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instruction^ in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Huntridge Theater____________________________________ other names/site number Httntridge Performing Arts- Tfieater___________________ 2. Location street & number 1208 E. Charleston Bbqlevara___________________ Q not for publication city or town Las Vegas______________________________________ Q vicinity state Nevada_________ code NV county Clark_________ code QQ3 zip code 8 ^10^ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, 1 hereby certify that this 0 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property JZ1 meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. 1 recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D statewide JZ? locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Culinary Workers Union Local 226 Las Vegas, Nevada Photographs
    Guide to the Culinary Workers Union Local 226 Las Vegas, Nevada Photographs This finding aid was created by Hannah Robinson and Kayla McDuffie. This copy was published on September 11, 2020. Persistent URL for this finding aid: http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/f16g7f © 2020 The Regents of the University of Nevada. All rights reserved. University of Nevada, Las Vegas. University Libraries. Special Collections and Archives. Box 457010 4505 S. Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-7010 [email protected] Guide to the Culinary Workers Union Local 226 Las Vegas, Nevada Photographs Table of Contents Summary Information ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Note ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Scope and Contents Note ................................................................................................................................ 6 Arrangement Note ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................. 7 Names and Subjects ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Collection
    [Show full text]
  • Land for Sale
    1829-1898 1829:Spanish explorers name springs in the desert Las Vegas — Spanish for “the meadows.” 1844:John Fremont’s journal of camping at the Las Vegas Springs brings publicity to the area. 1855:Mormons make first attempt to settle Las Vegas. Oct. 31, 1864:Nevada is admitted as the 36th state in the Union. 1900-1909 1902:U.S. Sen. William Andrews Clark looks to connect transcontinental railroad through Las Vegas. May 15, 1905:Clark auctions off 600 plots of land, establishing Las Vegas as a town. Land for sale 1905:The First United Methodist Church of Las Vegas is formed. 1906:What is now the Golden Gate Hotel & Casino opens as the Hotel Nevada in downtown Las Vegas. 1907:First telephone wires installed on Fremont Street. July 1, 1909:Clark County is created. 1909:Nevada bans gambling. 1910-1919 March 16, 1911:The city of Las Vegas is incorporated. 1911:Laws liberalized to allow for “quickie” divorce after six weeks of residency. 1919:Prohibition is ratified — all consumption, manufacturing and distribution of liquor banned. 1920-1929 1920:Population of Las Vegas is 2,304 (Clark County, 4,859). Nov. 24, 1922:Colorado River Compact is signed by seven western states to divide water equally. 1925:Fremont Street is paved. Las Vegas Tourist Guides Guild P.O. Box 46144 Las Vegas, Nevada 89114 www.lvtgg.com First class April, 1926:Western Airlines provides first commercial flight at Rockwell Field. Dec. 21, 1928:The Boulder Canyon Project Act approved, authorizing construction of a dam on the Colorado River. 1928:The El Portal Theatre opens on Fremont Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Preservation Plan
    The City of Las Vegas Historic Properties & Neighborhoods Preservation Plan Element of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan was adopted by City Council on September 5, 2007 (Ordinance # 5931), and revised on August 4, 2010 (Ordinance # 6104). Historic Properties & Neighborhoods Preservation Plan Element Historic Properties & Neighborhoods Preservation HistoricProperties&NeighborhoodsPreservationPlanElement/rs/08/04/10 CITY OF LAS VEGAS HISTORIC PROPERTIES & NEIGHBORHOODS PRESERVATION PLAN ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TASKS ............................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose ..........................................................................................................................................3 Enabling Legislation .................................................................................................................4 Relationship to the City of Las Vegas Master Plan 2020 ...............................................9 Planning Process .......................................................................................................................10 BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................................................11 Planning Context ......................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • 1Q19-Las Vegas-Office-Market
    RESEARCH 4Q 2019 LAS VEGAS OFFICE MARKET THE NEW VIEW OF VEGAS CURRENT CONDITIONS Several new developments are underway in Las Vegas. The Boring Co. is currently boring under the expanding Las Vegas Convention Center, building New York-based small business partner and financier recently ranked the foundation for the Valley’s first people-mover that will transport Henderson, Nevada as a top 11 location in the U.S. for startups. thousands of conventioneers and businesspersons throughout the Convention District in the Central East submarket. Located just south of the Japan-based IT. and communications company has mentioned Las Arts District and Downtown, the historic Huntridge Theater, which was left Vegas as a prospective regional office for 300 employees. vacant for over a decade, has new ownership that has plans to create new retail, condos or office product. Luxury fitness operator Life Time acquired Amazon is expected to move 125 corporate jobs to Town Square LV. 14.9 acres across from Ikea in the Southwest for planned offices, apartments and a gym. Amazon has built several million square feet of warehouse and MARKET ANALYSIS distribution space and recently announced that 125 corporate jobs will be Asking Rent and Availability located at Town Square Las Vegas in the South submarket. Outside interest and investment are accelerating, and developers (especially local) will have Asking Rent/SF/Month and Vacancy to keep pace with demand by supplying future office development. WeWork $2.00 23% has leased space in the West at Two Summerlin, which provides the modern $1.90 21% design and functionality being sought by firms, and the project serves as an $1.80 19% archetype for the type of development that could lure investment from $1.70 17% outside of Southern Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 1Q20
    Las Vegas New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 1Q20 40 39 25 23 4 50 24 26 21 51 ID PROPERTY UNITS 4 Rome Pines 176 Total Lease Up 176 21 LV Maule LLC 344 23 Elysian at Centennial 306 24 Grand Canyon Shopping Center residential 60 52 25 Montecito 491 27 26 Vue at Centennial Phase III 314 27 Crystal Park 136 41 43 Total Planned 1,651 53 39 Valley Vista 364 40 Villages at Centennial Springs 154 41 Elysian at Buffalo 220 43 Rancho & Decatur 738 50 East Deer Springs Way & Losee Road 304 51 Shadow Hills 64 52 Vegas Trade Village 264 53 East Carey Avenue & North Pecos Road 118 Total Prospective 2,226 1 mi Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up Under Construction Planned Prospective Las Vegas New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 1Q20 9 28 7 42 10 46 45 49 44 47 18 29 ID PROPERTY UNITS 48 7 Auric 324 9 Aspen Heights 290 10 Elysian at Tivoli 359 13 Elysian at the Palms 285 14 Twain 287 66 16 Elysian at Hughes Center 368 18 shareDOWNTOWN 63 Total Under Construction 1,976 28 Meadows, The 334 29 Bel Village Las Vegas 513 31 Royal Crest 300 70 31 Total Planned 1,147 14 16 42 Decatur and Alta 480 44 Avante Lofts 260 45 Downtown 57 219 13 46 Downtown 57 Phase II 250 68 47 Huntridge Theater Redevelopment 50 48 Live201 117 49 Midtown - Downtown 478 66 Palms Redevelopment, The 1,480 68 U District Phases II & III 364 69 69 Cameron Street & Tropicana Avenue 293 70 Polaris Avenue & Spring Mountain Road 471 Total Prospective 4,462 2000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up Under Construction Planned Prospective Las Vegas New Construction
    [Show full text]