DOCSLIB.ORG

2007 Boundary Increase Nomination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2007 Boundary Increase Nomination Nrlj Form 10-000 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev, Aug 2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGjSTRATION FORM '',:.I 'i~rrn1s lor rlst: 111 nnn:lnsllrlg or rccluesling deterr~~inalionsfor individual properks and dislrrcts. See rfis:ruct~onsIn biow?~COIH#/CIB ltle Idat~ot~alRo~!sfe~-uf +:,<'o:I:: (':,?srs~~?~I:.I!JIIOR FO~II?(Natlonol Register Bulletiri 16A) Cornplele each rlern by rnarking 'x" tn Ihe appropriatr: !%x cr !:v enlcrlng the ~nfom~alron I If al::? !!em doas no! apply lo !he properly being docurnen?ed.enter "MIA" for "not applrcaSle." For furlctigns, architectt~ralclass~fication. nlarer~als, and ,!1(:;1?:)! :.!yln:l!ci7l1ce. rrller only calegor!es and subcate~oriesfrom the instruclions. Place atcdit~onalentr~es and natralrue ~lenison conl!nualdcn sheers (NF'S +:!IT:'!! '.l'l?:? t (.Is? 8 \yl)e:vrl!er. twrr! :>rocessor, or cornpuler. 10 complete 311 rtenis -----------------------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------*------------ ----------------------------------- 1. Name of Property -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- h~stor~cname Western State Hospital, Boundaw Increase 2007 other nzmes/srte number Western State Hospital Steam Generatinq Plant, VDHR File No. 132-0009-0027 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Location ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+-+----------- street 8 nu~nber301 Greenville Avenue, adjacent to NE corner of Rt 11 and Rt. 250 not for publication, NIA c~tyor town Staunton vicinity NIA s!;rte V~rq~n~a code VA county Staunton (Independent Oty) code 790 zip code 24401 ----------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification ..............................................................................................---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A.: Pi- ::cs~yn;~lwl auttiorily CIRI!C~ the Nalional H~stor~cPreservation Act. as amended. I hereby ccrtrfy that this -x- nonxnatton -rwlucs! '.)I flr,tr.rn~in;-lt~wul ~lrr;lbtIrty r-nects the documenZat~Onstandards lor regasterrng prnperl~esIn the National Regrstcr of Hislonc Phcf!s ar?d rIlr*(.t~,tll~ liri)l:('~?~~~Al anrl profess~onnl requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinron, the property2rncols -dops riot rlw~t Iht8N;i11(7r7;;ll R~CJIS~C~Crl{erta I remmmend that thls property be considered s!gnrfrcanl natronally - slatcw~dex locally, (Seecontinuation sheet for add~tlonalcomments.) p;.- 4 '\ Signature of ce61ylng offical 1-=-% Virginia Department of Historic Resources slit? or Federal Agency or TnSa1 government ,n I'rl: (-;.!:"!)I- I~IC~IrTljly!Tfy -- meets doesnot mscl the Nat~onalRegister criteri;~.( Sec conl~nuatinnsheel !rjr nil(!it~onnl ~)l!;l~:#~,~l\\ ..- - -. - -.. S~c~nztur~:~f cornnientrng off~c~afflitle Date -*----.. St8ttit Or Federal agency and bureau ---------------------+---------+-------------------------+-----------------------------*-----+.............................................................................................. 4. National Park Service Certification ------L----------------------------k---------------------------d------------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- I. hereby cer,t~fythat Zhrs properly IS t!ntrrefl 411 t!:c National Register See cont~n~~ationsheet. tla:er~-nr?iedeli~jible for the National Register S~gnati~reof the Keeper - --- -- -. - Snc ncntir~tl~ltIOI? sheet. -. d~te~n~~ii~ec!50: e!ig~hle tor the Na+,ionalRegister :(:I;I!~V{~(! fro:n ihe National Register Date of Actlor.- -..-_. (l!l?F~;6?x?lzln): -- ,- ============================================================================================== 5. Classification ============================================================================================== Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply) Category of Property (Check only one box) _X_ private ___ building(s) ___ public-local _X_ district ___ public-State ___ site ___ public-Federal ___ structure ___ object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing __2__ __0__ buildings __0__ __0__ sites __3__ __0__ structures __0__ __0__ objects __5__ __0__ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register _N/A__ Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) __N/A_____ ============================================================================================== 6. Function or Use ============================================================================================== Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: _ INDUSTRY/PROCESSING/EXTRACTION Sub: ________ Energy Facility _____ ___________________________________ ____________________________ ___________________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ _______ ____________________________ ___________________________________ ____________________________ Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: VACANT/NOT IN USE____________ Sub: ___ ________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ============================================================================================== 7. Description ============================================================================================== Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) _MODERN MOVEMENT: Art Deco_________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ Materials (Enter categories from instructions) foundation ______CONCRETE_______________________ roof __ METAL; SYNTHETIC; CONCRETE_________________ walls BRICK; CONCRETE; CERAMIC TILE_______________ other _ METAL : Steel________________________________ Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) ============================================================================================== 8. Statement of Significance ============================================================================================== Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing) _X__ A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. ____ B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ____ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. ____ D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.) ____ A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. ____ B removed from its original location. ____ C a birthplace or a grave. ____ D a cemetery. ____ E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. ____ F a commemorative property. ____ G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) Health/Medicine_________________ ______________________________ Period of Significance___1800 - 1957_(entire district POS)__________________ Significant Dates ___1899, 1914 –21, 1921, 1930, 1949________ Significant Person (Complete if Criterion B is marked above)_____N/A_________________________ Cultural Affiliation _____N/A___________________________________________________________ Architect/Builder __Commonwealth of Virginia______________________________________________ Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) ============================================================================================== 9. Major Bibliographical References ============================================================================================== (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS) ___ preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested. _ _ previously listed in the National Register ___ previously determined eligible by the National Register ___ designated a National Historic Landmark ___ recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # __________ ___ recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # __________ Primary Location of Additional Data _x_ State
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck V. Bell Kevin E
    Georgia State University Law Review Volume 26 Article 6 Issue 4 Summer 2010 March 2012 A Review of Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell Kevin E. Grady Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kevin E. Grady, A Review of Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell, 26 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. (2012). Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol26/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Grady: A Review of Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supre A REVIEW OF THREE GENERATIONS, NO IMBECILES: EUGENICS, THE SUPREME COURT, AND BUCK V.V. BELL Kevin E. Grady*Grady· Professor Paul Lombardo has been a man on a mission since 1980, and he has culminated his quest by writing a wonderfully insightful book that should be required readingreading for any attorney practicing healthcare lawlaw or any attorney interestedinterested in reproductive freedom.freedom.' I Most of us have probably not thoughtthOUght much about the Supreme Court case of Buck v. BellBeZP2 since our first year Constitutional Law class when we read Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's famous quotation: "Three generations of imbeciles are enough.,,3enough."3 In that case, the Supreme Court upheld
    [Show full text]
  • From Far More Different Angles: Institutions for the Mentally Retarded in the South, 1900-1940
    "FROM FAR MORE DIFFERENT ANGLES": INSTITUTIONS FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED IN THE SOUTH, 1900-1940 By STEVEN NOLL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1991 To Dorothy and Fred Noll, and Tillie Braun. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In the five years this work has consumed my life, I have accumulated more debts than I care to imagine- I can never repay them; all I can do is acknowledge them with heartfelt thanks and hope I haven't left anyone out. The financial help provided by the University of Florida Department of History was essential, for without it, this project could not have even been started, much less completed. I would also like to thank the Rockefeller Archive Center, Pocantico Hills, New York and the North Caroliniana Society of Chapel Hill, North Carolina for their travel to collection grants which enabled me to conduct much of my research. My supervising committee has provided me with guidance, support, and help at every step of the process. Special thanks to Kermit Hall, my chairman, for his faith in my abilities and his knack for discovering the truly meaningful in my work. He always found time for my harried questions, even in the middle of an incredibly busy schedule. The other committee members, Robert Hatch, Michael Radelet, Bertram Wyatt-Brown, and Robert Zieger, all provided valuable intellectual advice and guidance. Michael Radelet also proved that good teaching, good research, and social 111 activism are not mutually exclusive variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth Century Understandings of Puerperal Insanity at Dix Hospital
    UNNATURAL MOTHERS: Nineteenth Century Understandings of Puerperal Insanity at Dix Hospital Hannah Frisch A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of American Studies in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Robert Allen (Thesis Advisor) Department of American Studies Michelle Robinson Department of American Studies Tim Marr Department of American Studies Table of Contents. Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ..................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: Statistical Understandings and Comparisons ........................................ 16 Chapter 2: Amelia B. ............................................................................................... 31 Chapter 3: Bettie J. .................................................................................................. 43 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 55 Appendix. ................................................................................................................ 58 Bibliography ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America
    Voces Novae Volume 11 Article 3 2019 Engineering Mankind: The oS ciopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Megan Lee [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae Part of the American Politics Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Genetics and Genomics Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Megan (2019) "Engineering Mankind: The ocS iopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America," Voces Novae: Vol. 11, Article 3. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Voces Novae by an authorized editor of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lee: Engineering Mankind: The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Engineering Mankind: The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Megan Lee “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”1 This statement was made by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. while presenting the court’s majority opinion on the sterilization of a seventeen-year old girl in 1927. The concept of forced sterilization emerged during the American Eugenics Movement of the early 20th century. In 1909, California became one of the first states to introduce eugenic laws which legalized the forced sterilization of those deemed “feeble-minded.” The victims were mentally ill patients in psychiatric state hospitals, individuals who suffered from epilepsy and autism, and prisoners with criminal convictions, all of whom were forcibly castrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenics in America by Anne Legge
    Torch Magazine • Fall 2018 Eugenics in America By Anne Legge In his wonderfully written D. Rockefeller, Alexander Graham book The Gene: An Intimate Bell, and Supreme Court Justice History, Pulitzer prize-winning Oliver Wendell Holmes. Not author Siddhartha Mukherjee himself a hard-core eugenicist, characterizes eugenics as a Charles Darwin acknowledged the “flirtation with the perfectibility need for altruism and aid for our of man” (12). An ingredient of weaker brothers and sisters, but the Progressive Movement in hard-core geneticists embraced the United States from 1890 to the thinking of Social Darwinism, The late Anne Legge was a retired 1930, eugenics was a response to questioning even vaccination and associate professor of English from Lord Fairfax Community College, the stresses of the time including philanthropy as factors that enable Middletown, Virginia. industrialization, immigration, the weaker to survive. and urbanization. Eugenics came She graduated Phi Beta Kappa from the College of William and in two varieties: positive eugenics Eugenics was inherently racist, Mary, where she was student encouraged breeding of desirable based on a belief in the superiority body president. She also earned a stock, and negative eugenics of Nordic stock and on preserving graduate degree from the University of Virginia. prevented reproduction of the unfit the purity of the “germ-plasm,” the (Cohen 47). The problem is who eugenicists’ term for the inheritance A member of the Winchester Torch decides who is “fit,” and by what package carried by individuals. The Club since 1983, she served as club president (1986-87) and received the criteria. By its very nature, eugenics national stock of germ-plasm was Silver Torch Award in 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Us Government Shaped Citizenship During the 20Th
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The Reproduction Of Citizenship: How The U.s. Government Shaped Citizenship During The 20th Century By Regulating Fertility, Procreation, And Birth Across Generations Elspeth M. Wilson University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Elspeth M., "The Reproduction Of Citizenship: How The U.s. Government Shaped Citizenship During The 20th Century By Regulating Fertility, Procreation, And Birth Across Generations" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2921. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2921 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2921 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Reproduction Of Citizenship: How The U.s. Government Shaped Citizenship During The 20th Century By Regulating Fertility, Procreation, And Birth Across Generations Abstract Who qualifies, with full status, as an American citizen? Like all modern nation-states, the United States erects and maintains various types of legal and geographic boundaries to demarcate citizens from noncitizens. The literature in political science tends to focus on the ways in which immigration law structures citizenship over time, but this is only half the story. As this dissertation demonstrates, governments also regulate the birth of citizens from one generation to the next. The concept of a ‘civic lineage regime’ is introduced as the domestic counterpart to the ‘immigration regime,’ when it comes to structuring civic membership in the United States (and other nations). To bring visibility to this deeply constitutive yet largely unexamined dimension of American political development, the project engages in a close analysis of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the United States Influence on German Eugenics
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2020 A Study of the United States Influence on German ugenics.E Cameron Williams East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Cameron, "A Study of the United States Influence on German ugenics.E " (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3781. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3781 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Study of the United States Influence on German Eugenics _________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Cameron Williams August 2020 _____________________ Stephen Fritz, Chair Daryl Carter Tom Lee Keywords: Eugenics, United States, Racial Hygienists, Racial, Law, Health ABSTRACT A Study of the United States Influence on German Eugenics by Cameron Williams This thesis is a study of the influence and effects that the United States had upon Germany from the rise of eugenics to its fall following the end of World War II. There are three stages to this study.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Albans Hospital______Other Names/Site Number: St
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. VLR Listed: 9/19/2019 1. Name of Property NRHP Listed: 1/24/2020 Historic name: _St. Albans Hospital_______ Other names/site number: _St. Albans School; St. Albans Sanatorium; St. Albans Psychiatric Hospital; DHR # 077-0046__ Name of related multiple property listing: ___N/A_________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: __6248 University Park Drive______________________ City or town: __Radford_______ State: __VA_______ County: _Pulaski________ Not For Publication: N/A Vicinity: N/A ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets
    [Show full text]
  • The Library of Virginia Quarterly Report of Archival Accessions
    The Library of Virginia Quarterly Report of Archival Accessions January 1, 2010 – March 31, 2010 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND DRAWINGS Gillette, Charles F. 1 sheet, Diazo print. Landscape architectural drawing, 1957, for Mr. and Mrs. Sol W. Rawls, Jr., Franklin, Virginia. Gillette project number 819. Gift of Mr. Sol W. Rawls, Jr., Franklin. (44612) Gillette, Charles F. 4 sheets, inkjet prints. Landscape architectural drawings, undated, for Mr. Samuel T. Peace, Henderson, North Carolina. Gillette project number 508. Gift of Mr. Sol W. Rawls, Jr., Franklin. (44613) BIBLE RECORDS Blake Family. 4 leaves. Mathews County, Virginia, 1815–1936. Bible of John Henry Blake (1815–1903). Other surnames mentioned: Greene, Lumpkin, and Merchant. Gift of Helyn H. Collison, Timonium, Maryland. (44674). Crockett Family. 6 leaves. York County, Virginia, 1840–1972. Bible of Minnie Hogge Crockett Morgan (1908–2002). Bible printed in 1946. Other surnames mentioned: Hogge, Jayne, Morgan, Rowe, and Williams. Gift of William T. Crockett, Lynchburg. (44740) Gray-Pilgrim Family. 1 leaf. Wisconsin, 1795–1855. Transferred from the Dearing Family Papers (Acc. 44600), The Library of Virginia, Richmond. (44647) Hovey Family. 4 leaves. Massachusetts, 1782–1861. Bible of John Hovey (b. 1782) and Mary Gould Hovey (1787–1861). Other surname mentioned: Gould. Gift of the Sargeant Memorial Room, City of Norfolk Department of Libraries, Norfolk. (44485) Hunley Family. 5 leaves. Mathews County, Virginia, 1748–1872. Bible of William Hunley (1748–1817). Bible printed in 1802. Other surnames mentioned: Green, Hudgin, and Lewis. Gift of Helyn H. Collison, Timonium, Maryland. (44675) Rawls Family. 4 pages. Nansemond County, Virginia; North Carolina and Pennsylvania, 1833–1977.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006-2007 Boundary Increase Nomination
    =============================================================================================== 5. Classification =============================================================================================== Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply) Category of Property (Check only one box) _x_ private ___ building(s) ___ public-local _x_ district ___ public-State ___ site ___ public-Federal ___ structure ___ object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing __13 __1__ buildings __0_ __0__ sites __0__ __0__ structures __0__ __0__ objects __13_ __1__ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register __N/A__ Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) __N/A___ =============================================================================================== 6. Function or Use =============================================================================================== Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: _HEALTHCARE __Sub: _Mental Hospital_______________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: _VACANT/NOT IN USE________ Sub: ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Western State Lunatic Asylum
    Western State Lunatic Asylum: Past to Present Shealynn Murphy Intro to Public History Mary Baldwin College Prof. Rick Potter December 2011 In January of 1825 Virginia founded its second institution for mental health.1 Located in the city of Staunton, it was called the Western State Lunatic Asylum. Virginia saw its need after the success of their Eastern State facility in Williamsburg and wanted to extend the availability of such care further within the state. The facility consisted of 18 buildings on an 80 acre campus2. The large picturesque grounds were meant to be a factor in the patients’ wellbeing and care. Patients could garden, exercise, and work on the hospital’s tranquil grounds.3 The grounds were so nice that a wrought iron fence later had to be erected to keep local picnickers off the institution’s grounds.4 5 The original main buildings were designed by Baltimore architect William Small.6 He used both Greek and Roman revival elements in the design. The two-story end pavilions that 1 Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services. “Western State Hospital”. History. http://www.wsh.dbhds.virginia.gov/history.htm. 2 Staunton, Virginia; “Western Lunatic Asylum,” blog entry by Terry. January 1, 2011. http://travelwithterrystaunton.blogspot.com/2011/01/western-lunatic-asylum.html. 3 Virginia Heritage: Guides to Manuscript & Archival Collections in Virginia. “A Guide to the Records of Western State Hospital.” Historical Information. http://ead.lib.virginia.edu/vivaead/published/lva/vi00937.html. 4 Staunton, Virginia; “Western Lunatic Asylum,” blog entry by Terry. January 1, 2011. http://travelwithterrystaunton.blogspot.com/2011/01/western-lunatic-asylum.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Pragmatism, Law, and Morality: the Lessons of Buck V. Bell1
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PRAGMATISM AND AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY COPYRIGHT © 2009ASSOCIAZIONE PRAGMA Susan Haack Pragmatism, Law, and Morality: The Lessons of Buck v. Bell1 Abstract. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. – a founding member of the Metaphysical Club, and traditionally regarded as the first legal pragmatist – would eventually become a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. In one of his best-known rulings for the Court, Buck v. Bell (1927), Holmes held that Carrie Buck’s constitutional rights would not be violated by al- lowing the State of Virginia to sterilize her against her will. This disturbing ruling has sometimes been thought to confirm criticisms of Holmes’s (alleged) moral skepticism. But this, I argue, is a mistake: Holmes was no moral skeptic but, like James and Dewey, a moral fallibilist; and his ruling in Buck, misguided as it is, is nevertheless illustrative of his important theoretical point that judges are no less fallible about moral questions than the rest of us, and that it’s dangerous for them to imagine otherwise. To say that man is made up of strength and weakness, of insight and blindness, of pettiness and grandeur, is not to draw up an indictment against him: it is to define him. Denis Diderot2 Not long ago, I was startled to read in my morning paper that legislators in North Caro- lina were nearing consensus on how to compensate roughly 3,000 people who had been in- voluntarily sterilized under the state’s eugenics laws3 – the first of which was enacted in 19194, and the most recent of which wasn’t repealed until 20035.
    [Show full text]