Eugenics in America by Anne Legge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eugenics in America by Anne Legge Torch Magazine • Fall 2018 Eugenics in America By Anne Legge In his wonderfully written D. Rockefeller, Alexander Graham book The Gene: An Intimate Bell, and Supreme Court Justice History, Pulitzer prize-winning Oliver Wendell Holmes. Not author Siddhartha Mukherjee himself a hard-core eugenicist, characterizes eugenics as a Charles Darwin acknowledged the “flirtation with the perfectibility need for altruism and aid for our of man” (12). An ingredient of weaker brothers and sisters, but the Progressive Movement in hard-core geneticists embraced the United States from 1890 to the thinking of Social Darwinism, The late Anne Legge was a retired 1930, eugenics was a response to questioning even vaccination and associate professor of English from Lord Fairfax Community College, the stresses of the time including philanthropy as factors that enable Middletown, Virginia. industrialization, immigration, the weaker to survive. and urbanization. Eugenics came She graduated Phi Beta Kappa from the College of William and in two varieties: positive eugenics Eugenics was inherently racist, Mary, where she was student encouraged breeding of desirable based on a belief in the superiority body president. She also earned a stock, and negative eugenics of Nordic stock and on preserving graduate degree from the University of Virginia. prevented reproduction of the unfit the purity of the “germ-plasm,” the (Cohen 47). The problem is who eugenicists’ term for the inheritance A member of the Winchester Torch decides who is “fit,” and by what package carried by individuals. The Club since 1983, she served as club president (1986-87) and received the criteria. By its very nature, eugenics national stock of germ-plasm was Silver Torch Award in 2001. She was was elitist and paternalistic. the eugenicists’ primary concern. a two-time recipient of the Charles Seeing the unhealthy and unfit as Greeb Best Paper Award. The father of eugenics was the a burden on society, eugenicists “Eugenics in America” was originally British scientist Francis Galton, argued that improvements to the presented to the Winchester club on a cousin and contemporary of environment—housing, nutrition, March 1, 2017. Charles Darwin. Galton coined education, medical care—would the word “eugenics” from the not solve society’s problems but Greek words for “good” and only foster the survival of the unfit. “genes,” as well as originating the phrase “nature versus nurture” Although eugenics claimed to (Mukherjee 65-67). The intention be science-based, it could more of eugenicists was to use the accurately be called science- newly re-discovered Mendelian exploiting. In the classic debate laws of heredity to improve the of nature versus nurture, opinion human race. The movement in the first part of the 20th century became part of the zeitgeist of the favored the hereditary nature of day, the elite of science, politics, all disorders, physical defects, and education being proponents, and problem behaviors, including including Woodrow Wilson, eye defects, physical deformities, Theodore Roosevelt, Margaret dwarfism, deafness, epilepsy, Sanger, Andrew Carnegie, John feeble-mindedness (a favorite 24 Torch Magazine • Fall 2018 catch-all category), schizophrenia, educational exhibits and contests to do eugenic research. Other manic depression, insanity, for Better Babies and Fitter adherents were Edwin Alderman, tuberculosis, syphilis, even Families alongside cattle, pig, and president of the University of vagrancy, pauperism, criminality, sheep judging, with ribbons and Virginia; Harvey Jordan, dean and immorality. One serious cash prizes awarded to the winners. of the UVA medical school; and problem with the eugenicists’ A staff of examiners screened the Joseph DeJarnette, superintendent conclusions was that the science of contestants covering hereditary, of Western State Hospital in the day was woefully inadequate social, and educational attainments Staunton, Virginia. in understanding mental illness, and mental and physical status epilepsy, intelligence testing, (Cohen 61). Between 1890 and At the First National and the principles of inheritance. 1930, almost everyone who Conference on Race Betterment, Another problem was that few traits was anyone was a eugenicist in held in Battle Creek, Michigan, are purely hereditary. Mukherjee sympathy if not in practice. There in 1914, Laughlin quantified the explains, “Most genes react with were few dissenting voices except problem: “To rid the nation of what other triggers—environment, for the Catholic Church (Cohen he [Laughlin] called the ‘lowest chance, behaviors, or even parental 67). one-tenth’ of the population would and prenatal exposures—to require fifteen million people to determine an organism’s form and be sterilized over the next two function” (454). The eugenicists By 1931, 28 of generations. There had so far been had a kind of hubristic confidence fewer than one thousand eugenic that they knew exactly how to the 48 states sterilizations, he said, and that was master nature. Galton stated, “What not nearly enough” (Cohen 118-19). nature does blindly and ruthlessly, had legalized The policy Laughlin recommended man may do providently, quickly, might be irreverently called “catch and kindly” (qtd. In Mukherjee eugenic and release”: identify defectives, 72). institutionalize them, sterilize sterilization. them, and release them to return * * * to normal life. He continued, “If One of the founding fathers of America is to escape the doom of The eugenics movement American eugenics was Charles nations generally, it must breed advocated three courses of Davenport, a Harvard-educated good Americans. The fall of every action: education, segregation biologist interested in scientific nation in history has been due to and sterilization, and immigration breeding of livestock and dogs many causes, but always chiefest reform. Eugenicists published with an organization called the among these causes has been the articles and books, created college American Breeders Association, decline of the national stock” (qtd. and high school texts and courses, which soon extended its focus in Cohen 121). and held international conferences to human breeding. In 1904 attended by scientists, physicians, Davenport founded the Station The drive to enact sterilization and such notables as Winston for the Experimental Study of laws began in Indiana in 1907, Churchill, Harvard President Evolution in Cold Spring Harbor, quickly spreading throughout the Charles Eliot, and eminent New York. Davenport recruited nation. By 1931, 28 of the 48 states physician William Osler, as well eugenicist Harry Laughlin, and the had legalized eugenic sterilization as a delegation from Germany, Cold Spring Harbor facility became (Cohen 306). An important center who gave a presentation on what the Eugenics Record Office. of eugenic activity was the Virginia they termed “Racial Hygiene.” Funded by Andrew Carnegie and Colony for Feeble-Minded and American eugenicists even took other wealthy patrons, it collected Epileptics in Amherst County, their agenda to state fairs; the histories and pedigrees, developed Virginia, superintended by Dr. Kansas Free Fair of 1929 included manuals, and trained field workers Alfred Priddy, and characterized by 25 Torch Magazine • Fall 2018 Mukherjee as “the Hotel California deterioration on both sides” (qtd. journalists, and ultimately certain of mental illness: patients who in Cohen 134). In 1923, a Saturday ethnic groups. It was a steep and checked in rarely ever left” (79). Evening Post editorial endorsed slippery slope from sterilization Patients at such institutions Laughlin’s testimony: “If America to occasional euthanasia to were routinely sterilized by doesn’t keep out the queer, alien, extermination of six million Jews salpingectomy (surgical removal mongrelized people of Southern in the Holocaust. of a fallopian tube) for women or and Eastern Europe, her crop of vasectomy for men, often without citizens will eventually be dwarfed * * * the patient’s knowledge or consent. and mongrelized in turn” (Cohen The paperwork recorded that the 134). In 1929, Harry Laughlin showed procedures were necessary because Congress a chart of nationalities of appendicitis or pelvic disease. ranked by intelligence, a chart After the Nazis based on data from U.S. Army While the threat to racial testing. The verbal skills testing purity from within was addressed seized power was administered at Ellis Island to by segregating and sterilizing the immigrants who had just endured a “unfit” and by miscegenation laws in 1933, their trans-Atlantic voyage in steerage, in Virginia and other states, the had limited English literacy, and external threat was addressed by sterilization laws may have never before held a immigration reform in response pencil. Needless to say, most of to a surge of ten million white were modeled them tested very badly. The history immigrants from 1890 to 1924. of intelligence testing is bound Mainly Jewish, Italian, Irish, and after American up with the eugenics movement Polish, this population was said to because IQ tests were the tools be carrying defective germ-plasm precedents. for identifying the “incompetents” (Mukherjee 82), while the stock among the native stock as well as deemed desirable was Nordic Congress responded by among immigrants. To pursue this from such countries as Germany, passing the extremely stringent fascinating subject, you cannot do Scandinavia, Scotland, and Immigration Act of 1924. better than Stephen Jay Gould’s England.
Recommended publications
  • Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck V. Bell Kevin E
    Georgia State University Law Review Volume 26 Article 6 Issue 4 Summer 2010 March 2012 A Review of Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell Kevin E. Grady Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kevin E. Grady, A Review of Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell, 26 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. (2012). Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol26/iss4/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Grady: A Review of Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supre A REVIEW OF THREE GENERATIONS, NO IMBECILES: EUGENICS, THE SUPREME COURT, AND BUCK V.V. BELL Kevin E. Grady*Grady· Professor Paul Lombardo has been a man on a mission since 1980, and he has culminated his quest by writing a wonderfully insightful book that should be required readingreading for any attorney practicing healthcare lawlaw or any attorney interestedinterested in reproductive freedom.freedom.' I Most of us have probably not thoughtthOUght much about the Supreme Court case of Buck v. BellBeZP2 since our first year Constitutional Law class when we read Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's famous quotation: "Three generations of imbeciles are enough.,,3enough."3 In that case, the Supreme Court upheld
    [Show full text]
  • From Far More Different Angles: Institutions for the Mentally Retarded in the South, 1900-1940
    "FROM FAR MORE DIFFERENT ANGLES": INSTITUTIONS FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED IN THE SOUTH, 1900-1940 By STEVEN NOLL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1991 To Dorothy and Fred Noll, and Tillie Braun. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In the five years this work has consumed my life, I have accumulated more debts than I care to imagine- I can never repay them; all I can do is acknowledge them with heartfelt thanks and hope I haven't left anyone out. The financial help provided by the University of Florida Department of History was essential, for without it, this project could not have even been started, much less completed. I would also like to thank the Rockefeller Archive Center, Pocantico Hills, New York and the North Caroliniana Society of Chapel Hill, North Carolina for their travel to collection grants which enabled me to conduct much of my research. My supervising committee has provided me with guidance, support, and help at every step of the process. Special thanks to Kermit Hall, my chairman, for his faith in my abilities and his knack for discovering the truly meaningful in my work. He always found time for my harried questions, even in the middle of an incredibly busy schedule. The other committee members, Robert Hatch, Michael Radelet, Bertram Wyatt-Brown, and Robert Zieger, all provided valuable intellectual advice and guidance. Michael Radelet also proved that good teaching, good research, and social 111 activism are not mutually exclusive variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth Century Understandings of Puerperal Insanity at Dix Hospital
    UNNATURAL MOTHERS: Nineteenth Century Understandings of Puerperal Insanity at Dix Hospital Hannah Frisch A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of American Studies in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Robert Allen (Thesis Advisor) Department of American Studies Michelle Robinson Department of American Studies Tim Marr Department of American Studies Table of Contents. Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ..................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: Statistical Understandings and Comparisons ........................................ 16 Chapter 2: Amelia B. ............................................................................................... 31 Chapter 3: Bettie J. .................................................................................................. 43 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 55 Appendix. ................................................................................................................ 58 Bibliography ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America
    Voces Novae Volume 11 Article 3 2019 Engineering Mankind: The oS ciopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Megan Lee [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae Part of the American Politics Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Genetics and Genomics Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Megan (2019) "Engineering Mankind: The ocS iopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America," Voces Novae: Vol. 11, Article 3. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Voces Novae by an authorized editor of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lee: Engineering Mankind: The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Engineering Mankind: The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Megan Lee “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”1 This statement was made by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. while presenting the court’s majority opinion on the sterilization of a seventeen-year old girl in 1927. The concept of forced sterilization emerged during the American Eugenics Movement of the early 20th century. In 1909, California became one of the first states to introduce eugenic laws which legalized the forced sterilization of those deemed “feeble-minded.” The victims were mentally ill patients in psychiatric state hospitals, individuals who suffered from epilepsy and autism, and prisoners with criminal convictions, all of whom were forcibly castrated.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Boundary Increase Nomination
    Nrlj Form 10-000 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev, Aug 2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGjSTRATION FORM '',:.I 'i~rrn1s lor rlst: 111 nnn:lnsllrlg or rccluesling deterr~~inalionsfor individual properks and dislrrcts. See rfis:ruct~onsIn biow?~COIH#/CIB ltle Idat~ot~alRo~!sfe~-uf +:,<'o:I:: (':,?srs~~?~I:.I!JIIOR FO~II?(Natlonol Register Bulletiri 16A) Cornplele each rlern by rnarking 'x" tn Ihe appropriatr: !%x cr !:v enlcrlng the ~nfom~alron I If al::? !!em doas no! apply lo !he properly being docurnen?ed.enter "MIA" for "not applrcaSle." For furlctigns, architectt~ralclass~fication. nlarer~als, and ,!1(:;1?:)! :.!yln:l!ci7l1ce. rrller only calegor!es and subcate~oriesfrom the instruclions. Place atcdit~onalentr~es and natralrue ~lenison conl!nualdcn sheers (NF'S +:!IT:'!! '.l'l?:? t (.Is? 8 \yl)e:vrl!er. twrr! :>rocessor, or cornpuler. 10 complete 311 rtenis -----------------------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------*------------ ----------------------------------- 1. Name of Property -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- h~stor~cname Western State Hospital, Boundaw Increase 2007 other nzmes/srte number Western State Hospital Steam Generatinq Plant, VDHR File No. 132-0009-0027 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • A Catholic Justice Dissents in Buck V. Bell
    The Catholic Lawyer Volume 43 Number 1 Volume 43, Spring 2004, Number 1 Article 6 November 2017 Silent Protest: A Catholic Justice Dissents in Buck v. Bell Phillip Thompson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Fourteenth Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Phillip Thompson (2004) "Silent Protest: A Catholic Justice Dissents in Buck v. Bell," The Catholic Lawyer: Vol. 43 : No. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/tcl/vol43/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Catholic Lawyer by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SILENT PROTEST: A CATHOLIC JUSTICE DISSENTS IN BUCK V. BELL PHILLIP THOMPSON* I believe that the wholesale social regeneration which so many now seem to expect, if it can be helped by conscious, co- ordinated human effort, cannot be affected appreciably by tinkering with the institution of property, but only by taking in hand life and trying to build a race. That would be my starting point for an ideal for the law.' The educated man.., whose conduct is not guided by religion or morality, is a danger to the State and his fellowmen.2 3 I. OVERVIEW OF BUCK V. BELL In 1927, the United States Supreme Court accepted a case involving the involuntary sterilization of a young, unwed woman named Carrie Buck.4 A tubal ligation was ordered on Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude A. Swanson of Virginia: a Political Biography
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Political History History 1985 Claude A. Swanson of Virginia: A Political Biography Henry C. Ferrell Jr. East Carolina University Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Ferrell, Henry C. Jr., "Claude A. Swanson of Virginia: A Political Biography" (1985). Political History. 14. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_history/14 Claude A. Swanson Claude A. Swanson of Virginia A Political Biography HENRY C. FERRELL, Jr. THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this book has been assisted by a grant from East Carolina University Copyright© 1985 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine College, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Club, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0024 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ferrell, Henry C., 1934- Claude A. Swanson of Virginia. Bibliography: p. Includes index. I. Swanson, Claude Augustus, 1862-1939. 2. Legislators -United States-Biography. 3. United States. Congress­ Biography. 4. Virginia---Governors-Biography. I. Title. E748.S92F47 1985 975.5'042'0924 [B] 84-27031 ISBN: 978-0-8131-5243-1 To Martha This page intentionally left blank Contents Illustrations and Photo Credits vm Preface 1x 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposition in the Case Buck V. Bell
    2. Appeal of Carrie Buck to Circuit Court of Amherst County, by R. G. Shelton, Guardian. 3. Notice of Appeal from the Sterilization Order of the Special Board of Directors of the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded. 4. Order Continuing the Case. 5. Short Analysis of the Hereditary Nature of Carrie Buck. (From Deposition of H. H. Laughlin in the Circuit Court Proceedings.) 6. Abstract from the Testimony of Witnesses. (From the Brief of Appellee in the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.) 7. Opinion of Judge Bennett T. Gordon. 1. Analysis of the Hereditary Nature of Carrie Buck. {From Deposition of H. H. Laughlin in Circuit Court Proceedings.) 1. Facts: Granting the truth of the following facts which were supplied by Superintendent A. S. Priddy of the State Colony for Epilep- tics and Feeble-Minded, Lynchburg, Va.: (a) Propositus: "Carrie Buck: Mental defectiveness evidenced by failure of mental development, having a chronological age of 18 years, with a mental age of 9 years, according to Stanford Revision of Binet- Simon Test; and of social and economic inadequacy; has record during life of immorality, prostitution, and untruthfulness; has never been self- sustaining; has had one illegitimate child, now about six months old and supposed to be mental defective. Carrie Buck has been duly and legally 1. Analysis of the Hereditary Nature of Carrie Buck. declared to be feeble-minded within the meaning of the laws of Virginia and was committed to the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded, (From Deposition of H. H. Laughlin in Circuit C01-t.rt Proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Us Government Shaped Citizenship During the 20Th
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The Reproduction Of Citizenship: How The U.s. Government Shaped Citizenship During The 20th Century By Regulating Fertility, Procreation, And Birth Across Generations Elspeth M. Wilson University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Wilson, Elspeth M., "The Reproduction Of Citizenship: How The U.s. Government Shaped Citizenship During The 20th Century By Regulating Fertility, Procreation, And Birth Across Generations" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2921. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2921 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2921 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Reproduction Of Citizenship: How The U.s. Government Shaped Citizenship During The 20th Century By Regulating Fertility, Procreation, And Birth Across Generations Abstract Who qualifies, with full status, as an American citizen? Like all modern nation-states, the United States erects and maintains various types of legal and geographic boundaries to demarcate citizens from noncitizens. The literature in political science tends to focus on the ways in which immigration law structures citizenship over time, but this is only half the story. As this dissertation demonstrates, governments also regulate the birth of citizens from one generation to the next. The concept of a ‘civic lineage regime’ is introduced as the domestic counterpart to the ‘immigration regime,’ when it comes to structuring civic membership in the United States (and other nations). To bring visibility to this deeply constitutive yet largely unexamined dimension of American political development, the project engages in a close analysis of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorialization and Mission at UVA Our Grounds Should Embody Our History, Our Mission, and Our Values Submitted to President James E
    Memorialization and Mission at UVA Our Grounds should embody our history, our mission, and our values Submitted to President James E. Ryan March, 2020 Memorialization on Grounds Committee Members: Garth Anderson, Facility Historian, Geospatial Engineering Services, Facilities Management James T. Campbell, Edgar E. Robinson Professor in US History, Stanford University Ishraga Eltahir, Col’ 2011 and founding Chair of Memorial for Enslaved Laborers Wesley L. Harris, CS Draper Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIT Carmenita Higginbotham, Associate Professor and Art Department Chair Ervin L. Jordan, Jr., Associate Professor and Research Archivist, Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library Phyllis K. Leffler, Professor Emerita of History Matthew McLendon, J. Sanford Miller Family Director and Chief Curator, The Fralin Museum of Art at the University of Virginia Louis Nelson (chair), Professor of Architectural History and Vice Provost for Academic Outreach Ashley Schmidt, Academic Program Officer, PCUAS Zaakir Tameez, Presidential Fellow, Office of President James Ryan Elizabeth R. Varon, Langbourne M. Williams Professor of American History Howard Witt, Director of Communications and Managing Editor, Miller Center PCUAS Co-Chairs: Andrea Douglas, Executive Director, Jefferson School African American Heritage Center Kirt von Daacke, Assistant Dean & Professor (History & American Studies) I. Introduction The University of Virginia’s mission statement, adopted by the Board of Visitors in 2013, makes clear UVA’s “unwavering support of a collaborative, diverse community bound together by distinctive foundational values of honor, integrity, trust, and respect.” Those values are conveyed through the policies the University enacts, the programs and courses it offers, the students it graduates, the faculty and staff it hires — and, not least, in the names the University inscribes above the entrances to its buildings and the people it honors with statuary and monuments.
    [Show full text]
  • A BRAVE NEW WORLD of DESIGNER BABIES? by Sonia M
    A BRAVE NEW WORLD OF DESIGNER BABIES? By Sonia M. Sutert TABLE OF CONTENTS I. IN T R OD U C T IO N .................................................................................... 898 II. THE RISE AND FALL OF THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT ............. 901 A . THE O RIGINS OF EUGENICS .................................................................. 902 B. GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT AND EUGENICS LAWS .......................... 906 C. CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO EUGENICS: BUCK V. BELL .............. 909 D. WORLD WAR II AND THE DECLINE OF EUGENICS ................................ 914 III. PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST CLASSIC EUGENICS ............................ 916 IV. TOW ARD NEOEUGENICS ................................................................... 922 A. PRENATAL TESTING AND CURRENT GENETIC REPRODUCTIVE T ECHN OLOG IES .................................................................................... 923 B. ADVANCING TECHNOLOGIES: TOWARDS "DESIGNER BABIES" .......... 929 C. CULTURAL NORMS AND ACCEPTANCE OF NON-THERAPEUTIC REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES .......................................................... 934 D. DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN OLD AND NEW EUGENICS? .......................... 937 1. Presence or Absence of State Coercion ....................................... 937 2. Improvem ents in Science .............................................................. 939 3. E thnic and RacialBias ................................................................. 940 4. Societal Versus IndividualBenefit ............................................... 946
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the United States Influence on German Eugenics
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2020 A Study of the United States Influence on German ugenics.E Cameron Williams East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Cameron, "A Study of the United States Influence on German ugenics.E " (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3781. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3781 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Study of the United States Influence on German Eugenics _________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Cameron Williams August 2020 _____________________ Stephen Fritz, Chair Daryl Carter Tom Lee Keywords: Eugenics, United States, Racial Hygienists, Racial, Law, Health ABSTRACT A Study of the United States Influence on German Eugenics by Cameron Williams This thesis is a study of the influence and effects that the United States had upon Germany from the rise of eugenics to its fall following the end of World War II. There are three stages to this study.
    [Show full text]