The Bobwhite in Illinois
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 and 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate
PERFORMED IDENTITIES: HEAVY METAL MUSICIANS BETWEEN 1984 AND 1991 Bradley C. Klypchak A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Committee: Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Dr. John Makay Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Ron E. Shields Dr. Don McQuarie © 2007 Bradley C. Klypchak All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Jeffrey A. Brown, Advisor Between 1984 and 1991, heavy metal became one of the most publicly popular and commercially successful rock music subgenres. The focus of this dissertation is to explore the following research questions: How did the subculture of heavy metal music between 1984 and 1991 evolve and what meanings can be derived from this ongoing process? How did the contextual circumstances surrounding heavy metal music during this period impact the performative choices exhibited by artists, and from a position of retrospection, what lasting significance does this particular era of heavy metal merit today? A textual analysis of metal- related materials fostered the development of themes relating to the selective choices made and performances enacted by metal artists. These themes were then considered in terms of gender, sexuality, race, and age constructions as well as the ongoing negotiations of the metal artist within multiple performative realms. Occurring at the juncture of art and commerce, heavy metal music is a purposeful construction. Metal musicians made performative choices for serving particular aims, be it fame, wealth, or art. These same individuals worked within a greater system of influence. Metal bands were the contracted employees of record labels whose own corporate aims needed to be recognized. -
Birds of Perry County Contact Us the Tell City Ranger District of the Hoosier National Forest Is Open 8-4:30 Monday Through Friday to Serve Visitors
Birds of Perry County Contact Us The Tell City Ranger District of the Hoosier National Forest is open 8-4:30 Monday through Friday to serve visitors. Tell City Ranger District 248 15th Street Tell City, IN 47586 812-547-7051 Federal relay system for the deaf and hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339 website: www.fs.usda.gov/hoosier Great Bllue Heron Tufted Titmouse __________________________ vV USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. America’s Great Outdoors Last updated 11/2011 Forest Service United States Department of Agriculture The third and fourth columns are the genus and Using the Checklist species of the bird. The fifth column shows the The first column after the bird’s common name is bird’s status in Indiana as of 2009. (Available at http:// evidence of the bird’s breeding status in our area. www.in.gov/dnr/fishwild/files/Birds_Of_Indiana.pdf) CO = Confirmed breeding evidence FC = Federal Candidate FE = Federal Endangered PR = Probable breeding evidence FT = Federal Threatened SC - State Special Concern PO = Possible breeding evidence SE = State Endangered X = Exotic/Introduced OB = Observed, no breeding evidence Bird abundance will vary seasonally, and often from This shows highest breeding evidence value from year-to-year as well. Actual abundance is often dis- published 1985-1990 breeding bird atlas data and tinct from detectability. Some species may be com- draft 2005-2010 atlas data. (Available at http://www. mon but secretive and only rarely seen. Others may pwrc.usgs.gov/bba/) be numerically sparse, yet highly -
POPULATION TRENDS of the COMMON QUAIL (Coturnix Coturnix) in FRANCE and SPAIN: CONFLICTING DATA OR CONTROVERSIAL CENSUS METHODOLOGIES?
POPULATION TRENDS OF THE COMMON QUAIL (Coturnix coturnix) IN FRANCE AND SPAIN: CONFLICTING DATA OR CONTROVERSIAL CENSUS METHODOLOGIES? Puigcerver, M.1, Eraud, C.2, García-Galea, E.1, Roux, D.2,Jiménez-Blasco, I1, Sarasa, M.3 & Rodríguez-Teijeiro, J.D.1 1. Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. 2. Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, France. 3. Fédération Nationale des Chasseurs, France. SOME FEATURES OF THE COMMON QUAIL • Migratory and nomadic Galliformes species. • Current conservation status: Least Concern (BirdLife International 2017). • Population trend: it appears to be decreasing (Birdlife International 2017). • It is very difficult to census (Gregory et al. 2005, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360: 269-288 ). • It is a huntable species in some Mediterranean countries. Source of controversy between hunters, conservationists and wildlife managers TRYING TO CLARIFY POPULATION TRENDS • Census in: • Four breeding sites of France (2006-2016). • Two breeding sites of NE Spain (1992-2016). ACTIVE METHOD • The whole France (1996-2016), ACT method. • Prats, NE Spain (2002-2016), SOCC method. PASSIVE METHOD -Prats ACTIVE METHOD Vs PASSIVE METHOD ACTIVE METHOD: PASSIVE METHOD (ACT SURVEY): • It counts males responding to a • It counts only males singing digital female decoy. spontaneously. • 10 count points spaced by at • 5 point counts spaced by 1km. least 700 m. • Based in just one day throughout • Once a week throughout the the breeding season. breeding season. • It has a general design for 17 • Specific design for the Common breeding species. quail. • Large-scale survey (the whole • Local scale survey (2-4 breeding France) sites) INTENSIVE BUT LOCAL METHOD WEAK BUT WIDESPREAD METHOD PASSIVE METHOD PASSIVE METHOD (ACT SURVEY): PASSIVE METHOD (SOCC) • Only data from mid-May to mid- • 6 count points spaced by 500 m. -
Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma
P-1054 Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State University Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma Researchers involved in this study included: Kent Andersson Senior Research Specialist Eric Thacker Post-Doctoral Researcher Matt Carroll, PhD Evan Tanner, PhD Jeremy Orange, MS Rachel Carroll, MS Cameron Duquette, MS Craig Davis Professor and Bollenbach Chair in Wildlife Management Sam Fuhlendorf Professor and Groendyke Chair in Wildlife Conservation Dwayne Elmore Extension Wildlife Specialist, Professor and Bollenbach Chair in Wildlife Management Introduction Results and Implications There are two species of native quail that occur Survival in Oklahoma, the northern bobwhite (hereafter bobwhite), and the scaled quail (or blue quail). During the study, 1,051 mortalities were Both of these species are popular with hunters and recorded at Packsaddle Wildlife Management landowners. Due to a concern about declining Area. Forty-four percent were attributed to quail populations in the state, a cooperative quail mammals, 33 percent to raptors, 9 percent to study between Oklahoma State University and the hunter harvest, 5 percent to unknown predation, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation 3 percent to weather exposure and 7 percent to was conducted on the Packsaddle and Beaver miscellaneous causes. River Wildlife Management Areas from 2011- At Beaver River Wildlife Management Area, 2017. Broadly, the project was intended to 929 mortalities were recorded. Forty-seven document survival, nest success, brood success, percent were attributed to mammals, 27 percent habitat selection, genetics and movement of quail. -
Species Assessment for Northern Bobwhite
Species Status Assessment Class: Birds Family: Odontophoridae Scientific Name: Colinus virginianus Common Name: Northern bobwhite Species synopsis: Northern bobwhites breed and winter in New York—the northern extent of the range—where they occur in open, early-successional habitats and farmland. Northern bobwhite is a game species with an open season. Individuals were released in western New York in the 1930s and 1950s, though the influence of these introductions is unclear (McGowan 2008). Two subspecies, mexicanus and marilandicus, occurred historically in New York, with the former arriving from the west and the latter from the south. The populations within the original ranges of these subspecies are now heterogenous and the species is considered binomial. Northern bobwhites have been declining at an alarming rate for the past 40 years across their range. Breeding Bird Survey data show significant long-term (1966-2010) and short-term (2000- 2010) declines of -3.8% and -4.0% per year respectively for the United States, and -5.1% and -5.3% respectively for the Eastern region. Long-term and short-term BBS trends for New York are significant and declining as well, at -7.3% and -6.4% respectively, though caution is warranted because of small sample sizes. Christmas Bird Count data have documented fewer than 15 individuals in total since the 2006-07 season (McGowan 2007, 2011). Currently in New York, populations of wild, self-sustaining quail are restricted to Long Island. A long-term call-count survey in Suffolk County conducted since 1979 shows a precipitous decline in this region from an annual average of 101 calling males in the 1980s, to 41 calling males in the 1990s, and 10 calling males over the past 12 years. -
Effects of Field Management Practices on Northern Bobwhite Habitat
Effects of Field Management Practices on Northern Bobwhite Habitat John P. Gruchy1, University of Tennessee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries 2143 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996 Craig A. Harper, University of Tennessee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries 2143 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996 Abstract: Native grasses and forbs have been promoted in conservation programs to enhance habitat for northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus). How- ever, high seeding rates and a lack of management result in vegetative structure that is less than optimal. We implemented six management practices (November disk, March disk, March burn, March mowing, strip-herbicide application, and September burn) with a control on an unmanaged field of planted native warm-season grass in East Tennessee, 2003–2004, to evaluate effects on habitat for northern bobwhite. We recorded vegetation compo- sition, vegetation structure, and biomass of invertebrate orders preferred by bobwhite broods, 2004–2005. Disking treatments increased coverage of bobwhite food plants and reduced planted native grass cover. Disking and burning treatments enhanced vertical cover and openness at ground level and decreased litter in the season after treatment. March burning increased native grass cover and decreased undesirable grass cover. Structural and compositional variables did not differ between March mowing and control throughout the study. No treatment differences were observed in inverte- brate biomass. We recommend burning and disking regimes -
Habitat Selection of the Common Quail (Coturnix Coturnix) in an Intensively Managed Agricultural Environment
Ornis Hungarica 2019. 27(1): 99–109. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2019-0006 Habitat selection of the Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix) in an intensively managed agricultural environment Tamás Márton NÉMETH1*, Petra KELEMEN2, Ágnes CSISZÁR3, Gyula KOVÁCS2, Sándor FARAGÓ2 & Dániel WINKLER2 Received: November 11, 2018 – Revised: December 13, 2018 – Accepted: December 14, 2018. Németh, T. M., Kelemen, P., Csiszár, Á., Kovács, Gy., Faragó, S. & Winkler, D. 2019. Habitat selection of the Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix) in an intensively managed agricultural en- vironment. – Ornis Hungarica 27(1): 99–109. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2019-0006 Abstract This study investigated the habitat selection of the Common Quail (Coturnix coturnix) during the breeding season of 2014 in an intensively managed agricultural environment (LAJTA Project, North- West Hungary). In order to assess the habitat preferences of the Common Quail, habitat composition around oc- cupied plots were compared with unoccupied control plots. To characterize the habitat, a total of 11 variables re- lated to vegetation structure and diversity, food availability and landscape were quantified. Multivariate methods (PCA and GLMs) were used to distinguish the main factors influencing habitat selection and to model the pres- ence of the Common Quail. Based on our results, in the LAJTA Project, high probability of Common Quail pres- ence can be predicted in plots with higher herbaceous cover and more abundant arthropod communities. The network of ecotone habitats, particularly the proximity to woody habitats, also appeared to have significant im- portance during the breeding season. Keywords: Common Quail, plant cover, food availability, field margin, forest belt Összefoglalás Kutatásunkban a fürj (Coturnix coturnix) élőhelyválasztását vizsgáltuk intenzív agrárkörnyezetben (LAJTA Project), fészkelési időszakban, 2014-ben. -
Northern Bobwhite Colinus Virginianus Photo by SC DNR
Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Photo by SC DNR Contributor (2005): Billy Dukes (SCDNR) Reviewed and Edited (2012): Billy Dukes (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description In 1748, Catesby gave the Bobwhite quail the name Perdix sylvestris virginiana. In 1758, Linnaeus dropped the generic name Perdix and substituted Tetrao. The generic name Colinus was first used by Goldfuss in 1820 and, despite several ensuing name changes, became the accepted nomenclature (Rosene 1984). Bobwhite quail are members of the family Odontophoridae, the New World quail. Bobwhite quail are predominantly reddish-brown, with lesser amounts of white, brown, gray and black throughout. Both sexes have a dark stripe that originates at the beak and runs through the eye to the base of the skull. In males, the stripe above and below the eye is white, as is the throat patch. In females, this stripe and throat patch are light brown or tan. Typical weights for Bobwhites in South Carolina range from 160 to 180 g (5.6 to 6.3 oz.). Overall length throughout the range of the species is between 240 and 275 mm (9.5 and 10.8 in.) (Rosene 1984). Status Bobwhite quail are still widely distributed throughout their historic range. However, North American Breeding Bird Survey data indicate a significant range-wide decline of 3.8% annually between the years 1966 and 2009 (Sauer et al. 2004). In South Carolina, quail populations have declined at a rate of 6.1% annually since 1966 (Sauer et al. 2011). While not on the Partners in Flight Watch List, the concern for Northern Bobwhite is specifically mentioned Figure 1: Average summer distribution of northern bobwhite quail due to significant population declines 1994-2003. -
Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting United States
PROCEEDINGS Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the United States Live Stock Sanitary Association HOTEL MORRISON, CHICAGO, ILL. December 4, 5, 6,1940 PROCEEDINGS Forty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the United States Live Stock Sanitary Association HOTEL MORRISON, CHICAGO, ILL. December 4, 5, 6, 1940 COPYRIGHTED 1941 BY UNITED STATES LIVE STOCK SANITARY ASSOCIATION PRINTEDBY REESE PRESS,BALTIMORE, MD. TABLE OF CONTENTS Wednesday Morning Session. December 4. 1940 PAGE Address of the President .................................................. 1 Remarks of Mr. Tom Linder ............................................... 5 Report of the Auditing Committee ......................................... 6 Memorial Service ........................................................ 7 Are “Horse and Buggy” Regulations Adequate in these Streamline Days?- By Mr . Ray I. Cuff ................................................... 8 Report of Committee on Unification of Laws and Regulations-By Dr. W . H . Hendricks. Chairman ................................................. 14 Wednesday Afternoon Session. December 4. 1940 Field Tests of Crystal-Violet Vaccine for the Prevention of Hog Cholera- By Dr. C. G . Cole and Dr. C. N . McBryde .............................. 17 Remarks of Mr. J . L . Brock ............................................... 28 Report of Committee on Miscellaneous Transmissible Diseases-By Dr. Adolph Eichhorn. Chairman .................................................. 29 Discussion ........................................................... 34 Some -
Morphological Features of the Tongue in the Quail (Coturnix Coturnix Japonica)
Original article http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/jms.061113 Morphological features of the tongue in the quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) POURLIS, A. F.* DVM, PhD, Laboratory of Anatomy, Histology & Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Thessaly, Karditsa, GR 43100, Greece *E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Introduction: The aim of the study was to examine the morphology of the tongue in the quail. Materials and Methods: For this purpose, the tongues of six adult quails (three males, three females) were studied. Specimen’s observation was performed with a scanning electron microscope. Results: The tongue was triangular in shape with a shallow median groove along the body. The length of the tongue was 1.2 cm. The length of the body was 1cm whereas of the root 2 mm. The anterior dorsal surface showed a relatively smooth surface lined by keratinized stratified squamous epithelium. Openings of lingual glands, partly filled with mucus were identified. The caudal part of the body of the tongue exhibited two slightly raised symmetrical areas. A transverse groove separated the root from the body of the tongue. Along the posterior border of the root, a crest of conical papillae was observed. Behind the glottis, big conical papillae were also recorded. Conclusion: These morphological findings could be useful for further studies of avian feeding mechanisms and comparisons with other avian species. Keywords: avian, scanning electron microscopy, tongue. 1 Introduction The avian tongue has been the subject of research by have not been explored. In addition, the Japanese quail is many authors. The great bulk of studies have been focused considered to be a separate species from the common quail on the external morphology and on the dorsal lingual (AINSWORTH, STANLEY and EVANS, 2010). -
Turkey, Grouse, Bobwhite & Pheasant Wildlife Chapter Template
Gallinaceous Birds Order Galliformes Family Phasianidae Gallinaceous birds refer to a group of ground-living birds, like pheasants, turkeys, grouse and quail, that are chicken-like and share certain physical characteristics. They have strong legs and very thick, powerful toes with well developed nails, which are perfect for scratching the ground in search of seeds & grains. They also eat fruits, berries, shoots, leaves, grasses and insects. They have strong seed-craking bills. Males in this group often have elaborate plumage they can raise or spread during breeding season to entice a harem of females. Most males, also known as cockbirds or roosters, do not help with raising the precocial chicks. Females are called hens. These birds usually only fly in short, explosive bursts for short distances (sometimes accom- panied by a racous call) before settling down again. Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo Famous for its role in that all-American of holidays, Thanksgiving, the turkey is our largest game- bird. Adult males, “gobblers” or “toms,” stand up to 3 feet tall and 3 to 4 feet long. The hens are almost a third shorter and weigh half as much. Like all ground birds that rely little on flight, turkeys are heavy birds – an adult tom may be up to 25 pounds. Compare that to a large great horned owl that may weigh only three pounds! Wild turkeys have long slender necks and bodies with a fleshy, multi-colored head and neck. Their overall plumage is metallic bronze, browns and blacks to help them camouflage in the wild, and their tail feathers are edged in brown instead of the white tips found on domesticated turkeys. -
Columba Livia 3 Eurasian Collared-Dove
54 species Italy updated 2 June 2020 Bird-window Collisions Species 1 Common Quail - Coturnix coturnix 2 Rock Pigeon - Columba livia 3 Eurasian Collared-Dove - Streptopelia decaocto 4 Common Swift - Apus apus 5 Eurasian Woodcock - Scolopax rusticola 6 Herring Gull - Larus argentatus 7 Little Bittern - Ixobrychus minutus 8 Eurasian Sparrowhawk - Accipiter nisus 9 Common Kingfisher - Alcedo atthis 10 European Bee-eater - Merops apiaster 11 Eurasian Wryneck - Jynx torquilla 12 Great Spotted Woodpecker - Dendrocopos major 13 Eurasian Green Woodpecker - Picus viridis 14 Black Woodpecker - Dryocopus martius 15 Eurasian Kestrel - Falco tinnunculus 16 Peregrine Falcon - Falco peregrinus 17 Red-backed Shrike - Lanius collurio 18 Carrion Crow - Corvus corone 19 Coal Tit - Periparus ater 20 Eurasian Blue Tit - Cyanistes caeruleus 21 Great Tit - Parus major 22 Bearded Reedling - Panurus biarmicus 23 Melodious Warbler - Hippolais polyglotta 24 Eurasian Reed Warbler - Acrocephalus scirpaceus 25 Common Grasshopper-Warbler - Locustella naevia 26 Barn Swallow - Hirundo rustica 27 Wood Warbler - Phylloscopus sibilatrix 28 Willow Warbler - Phylloscopus trochilus 29 Common Chiffchaff - Phylloscopus collybita 30 Long-tailed Tit - Aegithalos caudatus 31 Eurasian Blackcap - Sylvia atricapilla 32 Garden Warbler - Sylvia borin 33 Subalpine Warbler - Sylvia cantillans 34 Sardinian Warbler - Sylvia melanocephala 35 Greater Whitethroat - Sylvia communis 36 Goldcrest - Regulus regulus 37 Common Firecrest - Regulus ignicapilla 38 Eurasian Nuthatch - Sitta europaea