DOCSLIB.ORG

3. Hittites and the Battle of Qadesh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3. Hittites and the Battle of Qadesh 2/5/2012 Lecture 6 Chariots and Kadesh HIST 332 Spring 2012 The Development of the Chariot • pulled by wild asses (onagers) • wooded wheels rimmed with copper • top speed = 5 miles/hour • yoked to a central shaft (turning difficult) • no bit for onagers • usually armed with javelins and axes 1 2/5/2012 Egyptian Chariot • lighter for Egyptian sand and faster • D shape of lighter wood • central yoke and axle – moved to the rear • belly-bar and leg straps – greater tensile strength • only 2 people: driver and archer • special quiver for archer Hittite Chariot • Heavier than other chariots • single text noting 80 chariots in a single battle – Middle Kingdom • training manual for charioteers found • Most important arm of military by Early Empire under Suppiluliumas (~1375) Chariot Comparison Egyptian Hittite • light D shape of wood • Heavy construction • arm of decision infantry • arm of decision chariot • shock troops for infantry • closed on enemy infantry • • two-man crew three-man crew – driver – driver carried a shield – shield bearer – archer w/composite bow – spearman used 6 foot spear • quivers w/3 ft. long hurling as a lance and heavily javelins armored • used as mounted heavy • used as firing platform infantry 2 2/5/2012 1270 BCE Battle of Kadesh (1274) Egyptian Side Hittite Side Ramses II Hatusili (Muwatalli II) • 4 Divisions (5,000 each) • Amassed a vast army in – Amun (Ramesses) Syria – Re • 3500 chariotry – Ptah • 37,000 infantry – Set • Hittite regulars • vassal states • mercenaries Egyptian Name Location Ḥt Ḥatti (central Anatolia) Nhrn Nahrin = Mitanni ‘Irṭw Arzawa (western Anatolia) Pds Pitassa (central Anatolia) Drdny Dardania (Trojans,[northwest Anatolia) Ms Masa (Mysia, northwest Anatolia) Krkš Karkisa (Anatolia) Krkmš Carchemish in Syria Qdš Kadesh (in Syria) 'krṭ Ugarit (in north Syria) Kškš Kaska (northern Anatolia) Lk Lukka lands (Lycia and Caria, southwest Anatolia) Qḍwdn Kizzuwatna (Cilicia) Ḥalba (Aleppo, in Syria. Led by its king, Talmi-Sarruma, Ḥlb grandson of Suppiluliuma I.) 3 2/5/2012 Battle of Kadesh: Military Field Intel As Amun Division is setting up camp: • 2 Bedouins were caught by Egyptian forces and swore their loyalty to Ramesses. – They claimed the Hittite army was still North of Aleppo – They were however spies sent by Muwatalli to deceive the Egyptians • Two real scouts were caught – Under torture they revealed the true location of the Hittites CP 5.12 Then, as his majesty sat upon a throne of gold, there arrived a scout who was in the following of his majesty, and he brought two scouts of the vanquished chief of Kheta. They were conducted into the presence, and his majesty said to them: "What are ye?" They said: "As for us, the vanquished chief of the Kheta has caused that we should come to spy out where his majesty is." Said his majesty to them: "He! Where is he, the vanquished chief of Kheta? Behold, I have heard, saying: 'He is in the land of Halap’ (Aleppo),'" Said they: "See, the vanquished chief of Kheta is stationed, together with many countries, which he has brought with him by force, being every country which is in the districts of the land of Kheta, the land of Naharin, and all Kode. They are equipped with infantry and chariotry, bearing their weapons; more numerous are they than the sand of the shore. See, they are standing, drawn up for battle, behind Kadesh the Deceitful." 4 2/5/2012 Phase I Hittites hide and wait • The Hittite army hide behind the tell of Kadesh, but Ramses believed false rumors that his enemy was still near Halap. • After beating what he thought was the truth out of two captured Hittites, he held a council of war and the vizier in a chariot and a rider on horseback were dispatched south to hasten the progress of the Re and Ptah divisions. Phase II Surprise Chariot Smash • While the Amun division was setting up camp, 2500 Hittite chariots attacked the marching Re division in two waves. • The other two Egyptian divisions were still on the far side of the river Orontes (Arnath) near the town of Sabtuna. Phase III Tightening the noose • Hittite chariot shatter Re division and tighten their circle on Ramesses • Ramesses “stands his ground and mounts a brave counter attack” • Ptah and Set dash across river to save Pharaoh 5 2/5/2012 Phase VI Hittites get greedy • Total rout of Egyptian forces seemed inevitable • The Hittites disperse the Amun division and began pillaging the Egyptian camp • Muwatalli sent an additional 1000 chariots led by the kings of Aleppo and Carchemish, two of his own brothers and many allied princes • keeps most of his infantry to himself on the far side of the river. Kadesh: Phase V • The Pharaoh, fighting among his body guard with his back to the river, looked lost. • A force referred to as Ne’arin arrived, surprising the pilfering Hittites, and drove them out of the camp. 1. Footsoldiers dropped off at the port city on the Med. coast 2. Recruits coming from Amurru • Ptah Division arrives • Ramesses reorganized his forces and the Hittites escape being surrounded by the Egyptians by retreating towards Kadesh. Stalemate at Kadesh Ramesses finally retreats • Ramesses receives a message from Muwatalli and decides to retreat • According to the Egyptians, the "wretched, vanquished chief of Hatti" pleaded with the Pharaoh “The land of Kemi, the land of Hatti, are at your service. They are under your feet. Re, your exalted father, gave them to you so you would rule us. Is it good, that you should kill your servants?” 6 2/5/2012 Egyptian Account of the Battle • Ramesses claims to have won • Muwatalli represents it as a victory for Hittites • Reality: stalemate, but Hittites forced to pull back “Battle of Kadesh South wall of the Hypostyle Hall Karnak Temple Kadesh “Poem” dialogue between royal shield bearer and Ramses II “We stand alone in the midst of battle, abandoned by soldiers and chariotry.”...His Majesty said to his shield-bearer: “Stand firm, steady your heart shield-bearer! I will chase them as a falcon pounces, I will slaughter, butcher, fling to the ground. Why do you fear these weaklings whose multitudes I disregard?” His Majesty then rushed forward. At a gallop he charged the midst of the foe. For his sixth time he charged them. I was after them like Baal in his moment of power, I slew them without pause. 7 2/5/2012 The Poem of Pentaur “No officer was with me, no charioteer, no soldier of the army, no shield-bearer ... not one of my princes, of my chief men and my great, was with me, not a captain, not a knight; For my warriors and chariots had left me to my fate, Not one was there to take his part in fight.” ........ Here I stand, all alone; There is no one at my side, My warriors and chariots afeared, Have deserted me, none heard My voice, when to the cravens I, their king, for succor, cried. But I find that Ammon's grace Is better far to me Than a million fighting men and ten thousand chariots be. Egyptian “Dispatch” of Kadesh “ (From the "Bulletin") "Year 5, 3rd month of the third season, day 9, under the majesty of (Ramesses II)...The lord proceeded northward, and his majesty arrived at a vicinity south of the town of Shabtuna. The peace treaty was recorded in two versions • Egyptian hieroglyphs • Akkadian, using cuneiform script; − fortunately, both versions survive. Such dual-language recording is common to many subsequent treaties. This treaty differs from others, however, in that the two language versions are differently worded. Although the majority of the text is identical, the Hittite version claims that the Egyptians came suing for peace, while the Egyptian version claims the reverse. The treaty was given to the Egyptians in the form of a silver plaque, and this "pocket-book" version was taken back to Egypt and carved into the Temple of Karnak. Treaty of Kadesh, Istanbul Archaeology Museum 8 2/5/2012 5. But now Reamasesa-mai-Amana, the great king, the king of the country of Egypt, has established this bond by treaty on a silver tablet with Hattusili, the great king, the king of the country of Hatti, his brother, starting from this day, to settle forever among them a good peace and a good fraternity. 6. He is a brother to me and he is at peace with me; and I am a brother to him and I am forever at peace with him. 7. Look, we are united and a bond of fraternity already exists among us and of peace, and it is better than the bond of fraternity and of peace that existed between the country of Egypt and the country of Hatti. Hittite king is depicted as god (wearing a pointed hat) and warrior (as he is wearing a short skirt and weapons) The relief is part of the Hieroglyph Chamber in Hattusha, Turkey. Relief of Suppiluliuma II, Late Empire (1267-1209) • Hittite kings seek divine protection Tudhaliya IV’s seal Tudhaliya IV at found at Ugarit Yazalikiya 9 2/5/2012 Hittite Empire evaporates After the son of Tudhaliya IV ascends to the throne, the king lists stop – mention of a rebellion in CHT – war with Ahhiyawan and city of “Milawanda” Numerous theories as to why Hittites disappear from historical and archaeological record What happened to the Hittites ???? Invasions/Migrations 1200-1000 BCE Ammorites Collapse of the Bronze Age 10 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Examination of Hittite Sin and Religious Sensibility
    Studia Antiqua Volume 8 Number 1 Article 7 April 2010 "I Never Did an Evil Thing": An Examination of Hittite Sin and Religious Sensibility David Ferguson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua Part of the History Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Ferguson, David. ""I Never Did an Evil Thing": An Examination of Hittite Sin and Religious Sensibility." Studia Antiqua 8, no. 1 (2010). https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua/vol8/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studia Antiqua by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. “I never did an evil thing”: AN EXamination of hittite sin and religious sensibility David Ferguson s early as 3000 b.c.e., a group of Indo-Europeans settled in what is now central Turkey.1 Speaking a language closer to English and German than Athe native languages of the inhabitants of that region, these people integrated into and adopted the diverse culture around them. They were the Hittites, who went on to establish a kingdom and then an empire.2 From ca. 1650–1180 b.c.e., the Hittites emerged as a major player in the world of the ancient Near East.3 In 1595 King Muršili I sent an army more than 800 miles away to sack distant Babylon,4 and later King Muwatalli II challenged Ramesses II of Egypt’s imperial expansion at the famous Battle of Kadesh in 1275.5 According to Ramesses III, the Hittite empire collapsed with the invasion of the Sea People around 1200 b.c.e.6 Remnants of the empire scattered, and some are mentioned in the Hebrew Bible among the groups in Canaan when the Israelites invaded.7 The title of this paper, “I Never Did an Evil Thing,” comes from a statement made by the Hittite king Hattušili III.
    [Show full text]
  • Nochmals Zur Geschichte Und Lage Der Hethitischen Stadt Ankuwa
    STUDI MICENEI ED EGEO-ANATOLICI FASCICOLO XXIV IN MEMORIA DI PIERO MERIGGI (1899-1982) ff ROMA, EDIZIONI DELL'ATENEO 1984 INDICE DEL FASCICOLO XXIV Ricordo di Piero Meriggi Pdg> 3 Ncar Eastern Trade and the Emergencc of Interaction with Grete in the Third Millennium B.C., by HORST KLENGEL » 7 Nilabsinu und der altorientalische Name des Teil Brak, von KARLHEINZ KESSLER » 21 Zu den hurritischen Personennamen aus Kär-Tukulti-Ninurta, von HELMUT FREYDANK und MIRJO SALVINI » 33 Nasalization im Anatolischen, von ONOFRIO CARRUBA » 57 Studien über das hethitische Kriegswesen II: Verba delendi har- ninkr/harganu- «vernichten, zugrunde richten», von AHMET UNAL » 71 Nochmals zur Geschichte und Lage der hethitischen Stadt Ankuwa, von AHMET ÜNAL » 87 II ruolo delle «truppe» UKU.U§ nell'organizzazione militare ittita, di SUSANNA Rosi » 109 II LUALAN.ZÜ come «mimo» e come «attore» nei testi ittiti, di STEFANO DE MARTINO » 131 Ittito:L^PFIN^^SAR)=§U.KI§SAR((ortica (?))>, di MIRELLA VITO ... » 149 Scribi hurriti a Bogazköy: una verifica prosopografica, di LORENZA M. MASCHERONI » 151 Die hethitisch-hurritischen Rituale des (h)isuwa-F estes, von MIRJO SALVINI und ILSE WEGNER » 175 Eine Anrufung an den Gott Tessup von Halab in hurritischer Sprache, von H.-J. THIEL! und ILSE WEGNER » 187 Die Inschrift auf der Statue der Tatu-Hepa und die hurritischen deikti• schen Pronomina, von GERNOT WILHELM » 215 Hurritisch nari(ya) «fünf», von GERNOT WILHELM » 223 The Outline of Anatolian Onomastics, by ARAM V. KHOSSIAN » 225 Le pays Istikuniu d'une inscription cuneiforme
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistics Development Team
    Development Team Principal Investigator: Prof. Pramod Pandey Centre for Linguistics / SLL&CS Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Email: [email protected] Paper Coordinator: Prof. K. S. Nagaraja Department of Linguistics, Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute, Pune- 411006, [email protected] Content Writer: Prof. K. S. Nagaraja Prof H. S. Ananthanarayana Content Reviewer: Retd Prof, Department of Linguistics Osmania University, Hyderabad 500007 Paper : Historical and Comparative Linguistics Linguistics Module : Indo-Aryan Language Family Description of Module Subject Name Linguistics Paper Name Historical and Comparative Linguistics Module Title Indo-Aryan Language Family Module ID Lings_P7_M1 Quadrant 1 E-Text Paper : Historical and Comparative Linguistics Linguistics Module : Indo-Aryan Language Family INDO-ARYAN LANGUAGE FAMILY The Indo-Aryan migration theory proposes that the Indo-Aryans migrated from the Central Asian steppes into South Asia during the early part of the 2nd millennium BCE, bringing with them the Indo-Aryan languages. Migration by an Indo-European people was first hypothesized in the late 18th century, following the discovery of the Indo-European language family, when similarities between Western and Indian languages had been noted. Given these similarities, a single source or origin was proposed, which was diffused by migrations from some original homeland. This linguistic argument is supported by archaeological and anthropological research. Genetic research reveals that those migrations form part of a complex genetical puzzle on the origin and spread of the various components of the Indian population. Literary research reveals similarities between various, geographically distinct, Indo-Aryan historical cultures. The Indo-Aryan migrations started in approximately 1800 BCE, after the invention of the war chariot, and also brought Indo-Aryan languages into the Levant and possibly Inner Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East C. 2000-1500 B.C. Author(S): P. R. S. Moorey Source: World Archaeology, Vol
    The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C. Author(s): P. R. S. Moorey Source: World Archaeology, Vol. 18, No. 2, Weaponry and Warfare (Oct., 1986), pp. 196-215 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124615 Accessed: 06-11-2015 06:35 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to World Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 141.211.4.224 on Fri, 06 Nov 2015 06:35:53 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Tlhe emergence of the light, horse-drawn chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C.* The recent appearance of three richly documented monographs assembling the diverse and often complex evidence for riding and traction in the pre-classical societies of the Near East and Europe (Littauer and Crouwel 1979: Crouwel 1981: Piggott 1983) provides an opportunity for reassessing a number of critical issues in the earliest history of the light, horse-drawn chariot, whose arrival in many ancient communities has long been seen as a source of significant change in politics and society.
    [Show full text]
  • M. Witzel (2003) Sintashta, BMAC and the Indo-Iranians. a Query. [Excerpt
    M. Witzel (2003) Sintashta, BMAC and the Indo-Iranians. A query. [excerpt from: Linguistic Evidence for Cultural Exchange in Prehistoric Western Central Asia] (to appear in : Sino-Platonic Papers 129) Transhumance, Trickling in, Immigration of Steppe Peoples There is no need to underline that the establishment of a BMAC substrate belt has grave implications for the theory of the immigration of speakers of Indo-Iranian languages into Greater Iran and then into the Panjab. By and large, the body of words taken over into the Indo-Iranian languages in the BMAC area, necessarily by bilingualism, closes the linguistic gap between the Urals and the languages of Greater Iran and India. Uralic and Yeneseian were situated, as many IIr. loan words indicate, to the north of the steppe/taiga boundary of the (Proto-)IIr. speaking territories (§2.1.1). The individual IIr. languages are firmly attested in Greater Iran (Avestan, O.Persian, Median) as well as in the northwestern Indian subcontinent (Rgvedic, Middle Vedic). These materials, mentioned above (§2.1.) and some more materials relating to religion (Witzel forthc. b) indicate an early habitat of Proto- IIr. in the steppes south of the Russian/Siberian taiga belt. The most obvious linguistic proofs of this location are the FU words corresponding to IIr. Arya "self-designation of the IIr. tribes": Pre-Saami *orja > oarji "southwest" (Koivulehto 2001: 248), ārjel "Southerner", and Finnish orja, Votyak var, Syry. ver "slave" (Rédei 1986: 54). In other words, the IIr. speaking area may have included the S. Ural "country of towns" (Petrovka, Sintashta, Arkhaim) dated at c.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages and Migrations in Prehistoric Europe Roots of Europe Summer Seminar
    Languages and migrations in prehistoric Europe Roots of Europe summer seminar 7–12 August 2018 National Museum of Denmark & the University of Copenhagen Languages and migrations in prehistoric Europe Roots of Europe summer seminar 7–10 August 2018 National Museum of Denmark Festsalen Ny Vestergade 10 Prinsens Palæ DK-1471 København K 11–12 August 2018 University of Copenhagen Faculty of Humanities (KUA) Multisalen (Room 21.0.54) Emil Holms Kanal 6 The Roots of Europe Summer Seminar Preface The Roots of Europe Research Center has its origins in a so-called Programme of Excellence funded by the University of Copenhagen and hosted by the De- partment of Nordic Studies and Linguistics. The founding members were a group of historical linguists specializing in Indo-European Studies, a disci- pline that goes back two centuries at the University of Copenhagen, to the days when the linguist and philologist Rasmus Rask (1787–1832) carried out 2 his ground-breaking research. The programme marked a new epoch in modern-day Indo-European stud- ies in that it began to incorporate the findings of archaeology and genetics in its quest to understand the prehistorical spread of the Indo-European lan- guages. This was not the first attempt to relate the many branches of the fam- Preface ily tree to material cultures and, indeed, genes. However, previous attempts were abandoned, after the field was, figuratively speaking, taken hostage by a nefarious alliance of pseudoscientific researchers and politicians around the turn and first half of the 20th century. After the Second World War, collaborations between archaeologists and linguists became rare and generally frowned upon.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Amarna Period Down to the Opening of Sety I's Reign
    oi.uchicago.edu STUDIES IN ANCIENT ORIENTAL CIVILIZATION * NO.42 THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Thomas A. Holland * Editor with the assistance of Thomas G. Urban oi.uchicago.edu oi.uchicago.edu Internet publication of this work was made possible with the generous support of Misty and Lewis Gruber THE ROAD TO KADESH A HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE BATTLE RELIEFS OF KING SETY I AT KARNAK SECOND EDITION REVISED WILLIAM J. MURNANE THE ORIENTAL INSTITUTE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO STUDIES IN ANCIENT ORIENTAL CIVILIZATION . NO.42 CHICAGO * ILLINOIS oi.uchicago.edu Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 90-63725 ISBN: 0-918986-67-2 ISSN: 0081-7554 The Oriental Institute, Chicago © 1985, 1990 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 1990. Printed in the United States of America. oi.uchicago.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS List of M aps ................................ ................................. ................................. vi Preface to the Second Edition ................................................................................................. vii Preface to the First Edition ................................................................................................. ix List of Bibliographic Abbreviations ..................................... ....................... xi Chapter 1. Egypt's Relations with Hatti From the Amarna Period Down to the Opening of Sety I's Reign ...................................................................... ......................... 1 The Clash of Empires
    [Show full text]
  • Who Maketh the Clouds His Chariot: the Comparative Method and The
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF RELIGION WHO MAKETH THE CLOUDS HIS CHARIOT: THE COMPARATIVE METHOD AND THE MYTHOPOETICAL MOTIF OF CLOUD-RIDING IN PSALM 104 AND THE EPIC OF BAAL A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF LIBERTY UNIVERSITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN RELIGIOUS STUDIES BY JORDAN W. JONES LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA APRIL 2010 “The views expressed in this thesis do not necessarily represent the views of the institution and/or of the thesis readers.” Copyright © 2009 by Jordan W. Jones All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To Dr. Don Fowler, who introduced me to the Hebrew Bible and the ancient Near East and who instilled in me an intellectual humility when studying the Scriptures. To Dr. Harvey Hartman, who introduced me to the Old Testament, demanded excellence in the classroom, and encouraged me to study in Jerusalem, from which I benefited greatly. To Dr. Paul Fink, who gave me the opportunity to do graduate studies and has blessed my friends and I with wisdom and a commitment to the word of God. To James and Jeanette Jones (mom and dad), who demonstrated their great love for me by rearing me in the instruction and admonition of the Lord and who thought it worthwhile to put me through college. <WqT* <yx!u&oy br)b=W dos /ya@B= tobv*j&m^ rp@h* Prov 15:22 To my patient and sympathetic wife, who endured my frequent absences during this project and supported me along the way. Hn`ovl=-lu^ ds#j#-tr~otw+ hm*k=j*b= hj*t=P* h*yP! Prov 31:26 To the King, the LORD of all the earth, whom I love and fear.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 'Expanding the History of the Just
    Title ‘Expanding the History of the Just War: The Ethics of War in Ancient Egypt.’ Abstract This article expands our understanding of the historical development of just war thought by offering the first detailed analysis of the ethics of war in ancient Egypt. It revises the standard history of the just war tradition by demonstrating that just war thought developed beyond the boundaries of Europe and existed many centuries earlier than the advent of Christianity or even the emergence of Greco-Roman thought on the relationship between war and justice. It also suggests that the creation of a prepotent ius ad bellum doctrine in ancient Egypt, based on universal and absolutist claims to justice, hindered the development of ius in bello norms in Egyptian warfare. It is posited that this development prefigures similar developments in certain later Western and Near Eastern doctrines of just war and holy war. Acknowledgements My thanks to Anthony Lang, Jr. and Cian O’Driscoll for their insightful and instructive comments on an early draft of this article. My thanks also to the three anonymous reviewers and the editorial team at ISQ for their detailed feedback in preparing the article for publication. A version of this article was presented at the Stockholm Centre for the Ethics of War and Peace (June 2016), and I express my gratitude to all the participants for their feedback. James Turner Johnson (1981; 1984; 1999; 2011) has long stressed the importance of a historical understanding of the just war tradition. An increasing body of work draws our attention to the pre-Christian origins of just war thought.1 Nonetheless, scholars and politicians continue to overdraw the association between Christian political theology and the advent of just war thought (O’Driscoll 2015, 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Empires Text PROOF4 PAGES Copy
    TWELVE GREAT BATTLES IN ANTIQUITY STONE TOWER BOOKS AN IMPRINT OF LAMPION PRESS SILVERTON, OR When Empires Clash Copyright © 2015 Patrick Hunt All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems, without permission in writing from the author. The only exception is by a reviewer, who may quote short excerpts in a review. Lampion Press, LLC P. O. Box 932 Silverton, OR 97381 Paperback ISBN: 978-1-942614-12-8 Hardback ISBN: 978-1-942614-13-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2015956932 Formatting and cover design by Amy Cole, JPL Design Solutions Maps by A. D. Riddle, RiddleMaps.com Front cover illustration: “Battle of Marathon,” (“Schlacht bei Marathon”) by Karl von Rotteck (1842), akg-images.co.uk, Used with permission. Printed in the United States of America Table of ConTenTs Preface ............................................................................................1 ChApTER 1 The Battle of Kadesh (1274 BCE) .................................7 ChApTER 2 The Battle of Nineveh (612 BCE) ................................19 ChApTER 3 The Battle of Marathon (490 BCE) ..............................31 ChApTER 4 The Battle of Issus (333 BCE) .....................................45 ChApTER 5 The Battle of Trebbia (218 BCE) .................................63 ChApTER 6 The Battle of Cannae (216 BCE) .................................77 ChApTER 7 The Battle of Cartagena (209 BCE) .............................95 ChApTER 8 The Battle
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec
    Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 Author(s): Lewis Bayles Paton Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Apr., 1913), pp. 1-53 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259319 . Accessed: 09/04/2012 16:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE Volume XXXII Part I 1913 Israel's Conquest of Canaan Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 LEWIS BAYLES PATON HARTFORD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY problem of Old Testament history is more fundamental NO than that of the manner in which the conquest of Canaan was effected by the Hebrew tribes. If they came unitedly, there is a possibility that they were united in the desert and in Egypt. If their invasions were separated by wide intervals of time, there is no probability that they were united in their earlier history. Our estimate of the Patriarchal and the Mosaic traditions is thus conditioned upon the answer that we give to this question.
    [Show full text]