Name of Provider: Royal Central School of Speech and Drama UKPRN: 10007816
TEF Year Two provider submission
Provider Context
The Royal Central School of Speech and Drama (hereinafter ‘Central’, or ‘the School’) is a small and specialist higher education institution that stands at the forefront of training and research in the theatre and performance arts. Placing students at the centre of its work, Central develops practitioners and researchers who shape the future of theatre and performance across the UK and beyond. This is achieved in a conservatoire environment that is vocationally focussed, industry aligned and intensely practical. We train students to high-level industry standards in specialist technical theatre practices and identify, inspire and equip cultural leaders to develop the future of the theatre industries. By creating new challenges in our training environments, and establishing ourselves as a world-leading centre for research excellence in performance, we foster a climate of creativity, artistry and innovation that prepares students not only for jobs, but for professional careers.
Recognition of the School’s world-leading teaching and graduate impact was conferred on Central by HEFCE in 2016 as a result of its review of institution-specific targeted allocations (ISTA); the review panel comprised a number of international experts, and led to the School being awarded the highest possible allocation of institution-specific funding.
Academic strategy and philosophy
Central is committed to: maintaining our distinctive ethos as an HE conservatoire at the crossing-point of HE, industry and the theatre and performance arts community. This consists of a fluid combination of scholarship and research, industry-related vocational training and research- informed teaching; the recognition that enhancement of learning is a project for staff and students alike, and that it takes many forms and relationships; active encouragement of diversity as a basis not only for an enriched learning experience but also for an enhanced working environment; opening doors to our disciplines for new thinkers, makers and practitioners in dispersed and diverse communities and seeking to lead participation in varied but interrelated communities of interest and study.
The School employs conservatoire models of intensive physical and technical training extended and informed by industry engagement, and integrated with a research environment of active staff research that is coupled with a research degree programme. It is widely known as one of the UK’s oldest drama schools, with Laurence Olivier, Harold Pinter, Vanessa Redgrave and Judi Dench among its alumni, in addition to contemporary stars such as Martin Freeman, Kit Harrington, Cush Jumbo and Riz Ahmed. Less well known to the general public are the world-leaders in stage design and technical production who graduated from Central, and the leading role graduates play in regional and community arts. From its origins as an institution that focussed on actor training it has grown and diversified to cover a full range of production, design and craft disciplines, social and community applications of drama and theatre, and specialist pedagogical practices (for example, the training of acting and voice coaches and movement directors). It is a constituent college of the University of London, with its own taught degree awarding powers, and was one of the first drama schools to situate rigorous, practice-based vocational training and learning within higher education frameworks and benchmarks. By 2015/16, 955.7 student FTEs were taught across three undergraduate programmes (640.7 FTE) and a portfolio of specialist postgraduate programmes extending from taught Masters-level courses (MA and MFA) to MPhil/PhD degrees. Postgraduate programmes (315 student FTEs in 2015/16, including those on research degrees) constitute the largest platform of specialist drama-related postgraduate provision in the UK.
Page 1 of 14 Name of Provider: Royal Central School of Speech and Drama UKPRN: 10007816
Central distinctively does much more than the traditional drama conservatoire. Its research-led teaching produces graduates who challenge the parameters of the discipline and make new art. Central offers the widest range of small vocational BA and MA theatre and performance arts courses in the specialist sector, with some subjects only available at the School. It also has the largest faculty of permanently contracted, expert scholars in either the specialist HEI or university drama department sectors, extensively supplemented by visiting professional practitioners. It delivers its teaching in diverse modes and levels of instruction appropriate to the curricula, including placement learning, community production work and collaborative outreach. Through industry-related and research seminars, Central provides a forum for professional and academic peers to engage with pedagogic, and research, discourses and practices from the UK and beyond.
Teaching Quality
Central’s undergraduate academic provision comprises three programmes: BA (Hons) Acting, which also includes routes in Musical Theatre and Collaborative and Devised Theatre; BA (Hons) Theatre Practice, with routes in twelve theatre and performance practice specialisms, including costume construction, stage management and performance arts; BA (Hons) Drama, Applied Theatre and Education (or DATE), which includes a pathway in writing for performance.
Together and separately, these programmes are regarded by current students, alumni, and peers in both academia and the theatre and performance industries as sector- and, indeed, world- leading.
‘Central graduates currently stand head and shoulders above other Drama School graduates.’ M.D., White Light – the market leader in lighting and audio-visual equipment
‘Central is a byword for high quality training both in the UK and worldwide.’ Kate Buckley, Manager, 42 – a leading management and production company
‘The BA DATE programme is exceptional: it offers an incredibly robust structure, with excellent staff inviting students to engage with an expansive range of practices and theoretical frameworks as well as providing unique placement opportunities with a range of local, national and international partners. Students clearly flourish, developing and pursing independent research interests and practical work that actively contributes to a wider body of cultural practices in educational, community and professional theatre contexts. […] It is also important to acknowledge the extraordinary commitment demonstrated by staff in the delivery of the programme.’ Dr Caoimhe McAvinchey (Queen Mary, University of London), External Examiner BA DATE, 2016
Student feedback on teaching quality
The quality of Central’s teaching is attested by the high regard in which it is placed by students, something that is clearly demonstrated by the ‘double positive’ flag that the School receives in the corresponding TEF metric. In NSS 2016, 95% of respondents agreed that staff are good at explaining things; 97% agreed that staff have made the subject interesting; 97% agreed that staff are enthusiastic about what they are teaching; and 92% agreed that their course is intellectually stimulating. Central is thus placed well above its benchmark in this area, and at a course level some of the responses have been even more gratifying: 100% of BA Acting respondents in 2016 agreed with every statement in the ‘teaching on my course’ category of questions. Comments about the School from NSS respondents in 2016 confirm its high standing in their view:
‘The course is so thorough, and has really helped me develop as an artist. I am so grateful for the generosity of the teachers, with their time, enthusiasm and rigour. What I've learnt has been very
Page 2 of 14 Name of Provider: Royal Central School of Speech and Drama UKPRN: 10007816
valuable, but just as valuable has been learning how to learn. I feel extremely capable, in a deep way which I don't know that I could have before Central.’ BA Acting NSS respondent, 2016
‘The course has helped me develop as a person and an actor in a way that I don't think another institution would have enabled me to. The support the staff offer to the students is exceptional, and though they push you to your limit, there is such a high level of care behind everything that they do.’ BA DATE NSS respondent, 2016
‘The low student-to-tutor ratio really makes your degree a personal experience and the course is able to adapt around you, your wants and your needs. All the tutors really care about you and the work you are producing.’ BA Theatre Practice NSS respondent, 2016
Central also gathers feedback from first- and second-year undergraduate students on their perceptions of teaching quality in the form of an annual survey that uses the core questions of the NSS. The responses to this survey have consistently replicated the high levels of agreement on teaching quality that the School finds in the NSS; in 2016, for example, 88% of second-year undergraduates agreed that ‘staff are enthusiastic about what they are teaching’, while 85% agreed that ‘staff have made the subject interesting’ and that ‘the course is intellectually stimulating’.
A one-to-one discussion on student feedback (gathered from the NSS, internal surveys and course committees) between Course Leaders and Central’s Director of Learning, Teaching and Student Experience takes place each year, and course leaders are required to respond formally in an annual course monitoring exercise. Student feedback in recent years has resulted in a number of specific modifications to course content and design as well as enhancements to the institutional learning and teaching environment. For example, the introduction of Student Support Inductions in 2015 led to the School’s outstanding rates of progression and attainment. A forthcoming review of assessment practices and procedures across the institution has been prompted by feedback on this area (see below for further details).
Accreditation of academic provision
Beyond standard HE validation processes and the rigorous quality assurance that is required of us as a constituent college of the University of London, Central's undergraduate courses have long been accredited by relevant industry bodies (the National Council for Drama Training, and subsequently Drama UK until its 2016 closure). This accreditation, in which major employers from the BBC to the National Theatre and the Association of British Theatre Technicians were stakeholders, has represented the highest standards of training within the vocational drama sector, and accreditation has demonstrated to applicants, students and other stakeholders that the School provides: professional courses that provide the expert training demanded by the profession. Students are trained by staff with relevant professional experience and by a wide range of visiting experts and practitioners who are currently working in the wider business; intensive courses that are full-time, with a programme which provides a high number of contact hours a week; work-orientated courses providing training for professional work in a demanding business.
With the announcement that Drama UK is to close, Central is actively developing its own professional standards framework in the next twelve months to ensure not only consistency in teaching and learning, but also clear communication of those standards and practices to industry and other stakeholders. As part of this framework, it has already established regular portfolio reviews, in which industry representatives participate as critical friends in an evaluation of the balance and currency of its curriculum as a whole.
Page 3 of 14 Name of Provider: Royal Central School of Speech and Drama UKPRN: 10007816
Teaching intensity
Drama and theatre conservatoire pedagogy works to an industry model of individual coaching, rehearsal and production. It is physical as well as cognitive, and operates within benchmarked - e.g. by NCDT/Drama UK - models of best and safe practice that pertain to physical space, specialist industrial equipment, and ethics. In contrast to many HE disciplines, it employs appropriately high levels of contact time and a low staff-to-student ratio. This model is particularly evident in the School’s BA Acting and BA Theatre Practice courses, where, in pursuit of preparing them for the demands of their professional lives, students will spend a minimum of 30 hours per week during each of their three years of study in scheduled learning activities in small groups.
Assessment and feedback
Our aim with feedback is to provide students with a chance for reflective development throughout their studies, enabling them to consider their personal and professional growth and to take ownership of lessons learned. It is characteristic for some students to have difficulties with feedback that does not simply grade their work, but as 2013 BA Theatre Practice (Performance Arts) graduate Sophie Grodin describes in a statement sourced for our 2018 prospectus: ‘I was challenged, pushed and encouraged to try out the things that might have seemed alien to me in the beginning, only to discover that those were the areas that came to mean the most for my future work.’
Assessment and feedback combine conservatoire methods with the best HE practice. Students receive frequent 'crits' (that is, in situ oral evaluations of their work from staff, either individually or in a discursive group) and constant formative verbal feedback on practical performance as part of the coaching/ rehearsal/ production model described above. This feedback is summatively framed by reflective self- and tutor-assessment feedback processes. This employs a range of methodologies from peer group discussion to the submission of journals, reflective portfolios, and essays. These evaluatively reflect on and contextualise practical learning and performance in relation to relevant critical and artistic contexts, as well as to assessment criteria aligned to the FHEQ and the relevant subject benchmark statements. In common with most conservatoires, Central does not use unseen, written examinations.
A significant amount of time is spent with students of all levels introducing and explaining to them the critically reflective assessment methods used in higher education arts disciplines, which can prove challenging for some students used to examinations and less discursive feedback. It can also present particular challenges for groups with a high incidence and diversity of dyslexia and other learning differences (22% of Central's students overall, and 24% of its undergraduate cohort, have a declared disability). While Central's recent NSS responses around assessment and feedback reflect these challenges, we are pleased that the work that we have undertaken in the last year to enhance assessment literacy amongst students has produced a huge improvement in satisfaction in this area, with %agree rates improving for each assessment-related question in the NSS by between 12% and 28% in 2016 compared to the previous year, and with a significant number of students now in the neutral range — neither agreeing nor disagreeing with these questions.
This work has been conducted specifically in response to student feedback (both in the NSS and Central’s own internal student surveys), indicating the importance placed by the School on collecting and responding to students’ accounts of their learning experiences. A particular success has been the introduction and refinement of methods of inclusive assessment across the twelve specialist craft and production areas of the BA Theatre Practice course, the only one of Central’s three undergraduate courses to have received below-par responses (in %agree terms) to NSS questions around assessment and feedback in the last three years. As a result, the course’s responses to these questions showed a marked improvement in 2016 (for example, 57% of respondents agreed that ‘the criteria used in marking have been clear in advance’, compared to
Page 4 of 14 Name of Provider: Royal Central School of Speech and Drama UKPRN: 10007816
35% the previous year; and 65% agreed that ‘assessment arrangements and marking have been fair’, compared to 37% in 2015). We recognise that there is still work to be done in this area, and a root-and-branch review of assessment processes and practices across the institution is to take place in the current academic year, but we are heartened by the success that we have already achieved.
When benchmarked against a group of similar specialist providers (comprising: Rose Bruford College; Royal Conservatoire of Scotland; Conservatoire for Dance and Drama; Guildhall School of Music and Drama; and The Liverpool Institute for Performing Arts), Central’s NSS 2016 assessment and feedback responses are even more positive, and generally well above sector averages, demonstrating perhaps that the questions in this survey are less attuned to the nature of intensively taught, practice-based courses that emphasise self-appraisal and self-evaluation in assessment. Thus: 78% of Central’s NSS 2016 respondents agreed that ‘the criteria used in marking have been clear in advance’ (other providers, 73%); 81% agreed that ‘assessment arrangement and marking have been fair’ (other providers, 74%); 80% agreed that ‘feedback on my work has been prompt’ (other providers, 69%); 88% agreed that ‘I have received detailed comments on my work’ (other providers, 87%);
Only the question that ‘feedback on my work has helped me clarify things I did not understand’ sees Central fall slightly behind this group of competitor institutions (77% of Central’s respondents agreed to the question, against 81% of the specialist provider group). The review of assessment will address this area specifically.
It is worth noting that recent reports from the School’s External Examiners for its undergraduate programmes also provide a more nuanced account of the successes of its highly individuated approach to assessment and feedback:
‘I have rarely encountered the attention to detail and individual scrutiny of student progress offered by the Collaborative and Devised Theatre tutors on the Assessment Feedback Forms. I am confident that this is a feature of all BA Acting pathways.’ David Bond (Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama), BA Acting External Examiner, 2014
‘Assessment processes are very thorough and students receive a good level of careful feedback.’ Dr Simon Parry (University of Manchester), BA DATE External Examiner, 2015
‘The level, detail and quality of feedback to students both formally and informally through tutorials is exemplary. […] Feedback is clear, detailed and helpful in identifying areas (even in the best work) where improvement could be made.’ Scott Palmer (University of Leeds), BA Theatre Practice External Examiner, 2015
‘The level of attention given to each individual student’s development and progress by tutors is to be commended. […] The practice of giving verbal feedback to students on performance work which the students then write up seems to me to enable students to take on board and make use of constructive feedback intended to help them progress in a way that a written feedback sheet might not. The written feedback I saw was extremely detailed, supportive and helpful.’ Dr Rose Whyman (University of Birmingham), BA Acting External Examiner, 2016
These comments were reiterated by students at the School’s periodic review of BA Acting in 2016 (the only such review of its undergraduate courses to fall within the TEF Year 2 timeframe). From the report: ‘Students noted that personal feedback is very detailed and very beneficial and stated that the level of personal attention given to students is exemplary. Students were positive about the detailed feedback shared via crits. […] The Panel commended the individuation of the teaching and feedback for each student, and the personal care and attention to the individual, from the point of audition to graduation’.
Page 5 of 14 Name of Provider: Royal Central School of Speech and Drama UKPRN: 10007816
The efficacy of Central’s developmental approach to student feedback and assessment is borne out by the very positive outcomes for its students in terms of their final degree classifications. In 2015/16 26% of the School’s undergraduates achieved First Class Honours, up from 18% in 2014/15; 63% achieved an Upper Second Class Honours degree, slightly down from 70% in 2014/15. (Lower Second Class Honours degrees remained stable at around 10-11%, while only 0.5% were awarded a Third Class Degree in 2015/16). External Examiner comments confirmed that these high levels of achievement were the result of a strong cohort, excellent teaching and robust methods of assessment:
‘This cohort performed exceptionally strongly. However, the assessment is well judged to enable differentiation between levels of attainment.’ Dr Simon Parry (University of Manchester), BA DATE External Examiner, 2016
Staff recognition and reward schemes
Of Central’s 69 permanently contracted academic staff, 59% possess formal teaching qualifications, and most have extensive links and experience within the industry. In total, 33 members of staff, including four members of the School's technical support department, are either Associate Fellows (3), Fellows (25), Senior Fellows (4), or Principal Fellows (1) of the Higher Education Academy. The School offers a range of continuing professional development opportunities for all its academic staff. As well as specialist disciplinary development such as advanced certification in Linklater technique (voice) and Perdekamp Emotional Method (acting), IOSH and NEBOSH (industry standard health and safety), twice-termly academic staff training and information provide CPD in topics that have included assessment, e-learning, neurodiversity in HE, best low-carbon/eco-responsible professional practice (an area for which Central won a Green Gown award in 2013) and mental health and wellbeing. Course leaders and academic heads of department attend training events run by MASHEIN (a network of small institutions run by the Leadership Foundation) and, since autumn 2015, Central has re-run a Postgraduate Certificate in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, successful completion of which provides an accredited route to Fellowship of the HEA. Six members of staff were accordingly awarded the PG Certificate in its first year of operation and were able to gain Fellowship of the HEA.
All interviews for teaching posts at Central include observed teaching sessions and therefore an appropriate engagement with the student voice in the appointment process. Once academic staff are employed at the School, a peer observation of teaching (POT) system is in operation, overseen by the Dean of Studies’ Office. New academic members of staff are always observed twice as part of their probationary year, and other staff members continue with POT on an annual basis. The system informs discussion when the personal development of academic staff in relation to teaching, learning and assessment is reviewed at annual appraisal. The Director of Learning, Teaching and Student Experience interrogates the observation forms to identify themes for further exploration at the termly internal seminars on learning, teaching and assessment. This has led to, for example, external speakers talking about learning and teaching practices that support students with specific learning disabilities and mental health conditions. The impact of this can be seen in the positive flags received by the School in the TEF metrics relating to employment or further study for those students with a declared disability (refer to the Student Outcomes section, below, for further details).
In September 2016, the School introduced a sabbatical and award scheme for developing Teaching Excellence, mirroring one related to Research Excellence. This gives staff the opportunity to apply for 14-week sabbaticals either to undertake projects that develop their pedagogical or specialist disciplinary expertise in industry or peer educational settings, or to produce specialist textbooks and industry manuals. There are also smaller schemes of £5k and £2.5k for developmental projects with defined outcomes that enhance teaching excellence and/or the student experience (these range from the development of new teaching methods or class/workshop formats, to buy-out time to develop HEA applications). Already two sabbaticals
Page 6 of 14 Name of Provider: Royal Central School of Speech and Drama UKPRN: 10007816 have been granted: to complete a textbook on actor movement training, and for a staff secondment to world-leading dramatherapy courses in Canada and the USA. Smaller awards have also been given: for example, to complete an edited volume on performer pedagogy; to develop the undergraduate Writing for Performance curriculum in relation to regional identity; and to develop a model of best practice for psycho-physical performer training with neuro-diverse students with specific learning differences. In January 2017 the School will introduce a Teaching and Scholarship career path with HERA-based grade definitions through to Professor. These recognise teaching excellence and scholarship related to specialist conservatoire and industry practices.
The School also runs a research sabbatical scheme and provides internal funding for research projects, both of which have led to teaching innovations: for example, one staff member’s research into health and performance in South Africa informed the development of Leverhulme-funded undergraduate placement projects in the area; the sabbatical research of another led directly to an HEA teaching development grant for ‘Care and Partnership: Applied Theatre and Social Enterprise’, with undergraduate teaching outcomes that included verbatim dramaturgy within the curriculum.
In common with other industry-aligned conservatoires, and small and specialist institutions in general, Central considers as a teaching strength the number of practitioner-teachers it employs – on hourly-paid or temporary contracts, or under self-employed arrangements (as agreed with the tax office) – who also work in the industry. In total, approximately 50% (FTE) of the School’s teaching staff are hourly-paid visiting professionals who inject specialist skills and industry relevance into our courses (46% FTE of our staff are on either full-time or part-time permanent contracts). This enables our students to gain first-hand, up-to-date insights into the professions they might enter upon graduation. We would also argue that such practices align with the government’s emphasis on apprenticeship schemes, providing students with the equivalent of in- house apprenticeships in conjunction with the strengths of HE.
In addition to their engagement with the relevant industries, Central’s academic staff are also noted for the esteem in which they are held by the wider academic community. This esteem translates particularly into national and international External Examiner appointments (at both specialist providers such as RADA, LAMDA and the Guildford School of Acting as well as large, multi-faculty universities such as Goldsmiths, the University of Winchester and the Central Academy of Beijing); membership of validation/ review panels and other curriculum advisory groups (for example, Richard Hougham’s position as Vice Chair of the European Consortium for Arts Therapies Education; Wendy Gadian and Nick Moseley’s roles as OFTSED inspectors); consultancy roles (for example, Professor Ross Brown’s consultancy advice during the formation of the University of the Arts, Helsinki in 2014, and his advisory work for the Department for Education in relation to GCSE and A-level Drama specifications); and membership of sector-level steering groups, panels and committees (for example, Professor Maria Delgado’s membership of HEFCE’s Research and Knowledge Exchange Strategic Advisory Committee; Jo Shah’s membership of the Research and Development Working Group at the Association of Learning Development in Higher Education). The impact and benefits of this engagement are twofold: Central’s academic provision and learning support and student services remain informed by sectoral best practice, and the School maintains a visible and influential role in (inter)national developments and debates.
Learning Environment
Conceived as a ‘central’ hub where diverse theories and practices meet, Central takes a flexible, non-doctrinal approach to training, drawing on high-level industry contributions. More than a conservatoire, it is also a laboratory where research and industry practice are brought into dialogue, innovations made and future directions anticipated. Central: