The Atrahasis Epic and Its Significance for Our Understanding of Genesis 1-9 Author(S): Tikva Frymer-Kensky Source: the Biblical Archaeologist, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Atrahasis Epic and Its Significance for Our Understanding of Genesis 1-9 Author(S): Tikva Frymer-Kensky Source: the Biblical Archaeologist, Vol The Atrahasis Epic and Its Significance for Our Understanding of Genesis 1-9 Author(s): Tikva Frymer-Kensky Source: The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 40, No. 4 (Dec., 1977), pp. 147-155 Published by: The American Schools of Oriental Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3209529 . Accessed: 02/04/2013 14:21 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The American Schools of Oriental Research is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Biblical Archaeologist. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 130.58.65.10 on Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:21:01 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE ATRAHASIS EPIC AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR OUR UNDERSTANDINGOF GENESIS 1-9 Dedicated to the memory of J. J. Finkelstein whose unique genius is sorely missed. TIKVA FRYMER-KENSKY The Babylonian Epic of Atrahasis, written no later than 1700 B.C.E., is an ancient Primeval History of Man which relates the story of manfrom the events that resultedin his creationuntil after theflood. Therecent recovery of this epic has enormous importancefor understandingthe great cos- mological cycle of Genesis1-9, for it enables us to appreciate the major themes of this cyclefrom a new perspective. The Babylonian Flood Stories Millard,Atrahasis: The BabylonianStory of the Flood, Oxford, 1969) can be understoodwith the aid of Three'different stories of the flood only Babylonian the other known flood stories. The Gilgamesh Epic have survived: the Sumerian Flood the ninth Story, a different for analysis. tablet of the and the Atrahasis presents problem comparative GilgameshEpic, Epic. Here the flood is in a secondarycontext, Details in these such as the of animals story clearly stories, placing and, more importantly,this context is so differentfrom in the ark, the landing of the ark on a mountain,and the biblicalas to cause seriousdifferences in content. In the sendingforth of birdsto see whetherthe watershad the the of the flood is relatedas indicate that these stories are GilgameshEpic story receded, clearly of the tale of for immortality. related to the biblical flood part Gilgamesh'squest intimately story and, Utnapishtimtells his descendantGilgamesh the story of indeed, that the Babylonianand biblical accounts of the flood in order to tell him he becameimmortal the flood different of an why represent retellings essentially and, in so doing, to show Gilgameshthat he cannot identical flood tradition. Until the recovery of the become immortal in the same This is Atrahasis the usefulnessof these tales way. purpose Epic, however, explicitly stated, for the story is introduced by toward an understandingof Genesiswas limitedby the "As I look lack of a cohesive context for the flood Gilgamesh'squestion, upon you, Utnapish- story compa- tim, featuresare not are as I ... rable to that of Genesis.The SumerianFlood has your strange;you just Story how did you join the Assembly of the gods in your survivedin a very fragmentarystate, and even its most for life?" recent edition Civil in Lambert and quest (Gilgamesh XI:2-7). Utnapishtim (by Miguel concludeshis recitationwith the admonition,"But now who will call the gods to Assembly for your sake so Tikva Frymer-Kensky is Assistant Professor ofNear Eastern that you may find the life that you are seeking?" Studies at Wayne State University, Detroit. Her manu- (Gilgamesh XI:197-98). script, Judicial Ordeal in the Ancient Near East, is forth- The nature of the story as "Utnapishtim'stale" coming in the series Bibliotheca Mesopotamicafrom Undena colors the recitationof the flood episode and makes it Publications (Malibu, CA). fundamentallydifferent from the biblical flood story. BIBLICAL ARCHEOLOGIST 147 This content downloaded from 130.58.65.10 on Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:21:01 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The "first person narrative"format means that Utnapish- tim can only tell those parts of the story that he knows, and that he may leave out those aspects that do not concern him or fit his purpose. For example, even though Babylonian gods are not portrayed as capricious and are considered as having reasons for their actions, Utnapishtim tells us nothing about the reasons that the gods brought the flood. This lapse is dictated by the literary format: Utnapishtim may not know the reason for the flood, or he may not record it because it is irrele- vant to his purpose, which is to recount how he became immortal. Similarly, the only event after the flood that Utnapishtim relates to Gilgamesh is the subsequent convocation of the gods that granted him immortality. The result of the "personalization" of the flood story in the Gilgamesh Epic is that the scope of the story is Jacob J. Finkelstein restricted to the adventures of one individual and its significance to its effects upon him, with the flood itself emptied of any cosmic or anthropological significance. (1922-1974) The flood stories in Genesis and in Gilgamesh are so far removed from each other in focus and intent that one cannot compare the ideas in the two versions of the flood In the three years since Jacob J. Finkelstein's without setting up spurious dichotomies. premature death at 52, the measure of his loss to Assyriological and biblical studies has become increasingly apparent. J. J. Finkelstein was a many- faceted scholar. He was a superb cuneiformist; his The AtrahasisEpic ability to read and copy cuneiform texts was unparalleled among Assyriologists, and the volumes The recoveryof the AtrahasisEpic providesnew of cuneiform texts that he published are an enduring perspectiveson Genesis because, unlike the other two monument to his work. Also an acknowledged Babylonianversions of the flood, the AtrahasisEpic master of cuneiform law, Finkelstein published presentsthe flood story in a context comparableto that seminal and provocative articles on many aspects of of Genesis, that of a Primeval History. The flood Babylonian law. His interest in law was far-reaching, episode of the Atrahasis Epic has been known for a and his essays "The Goring Ox: Some Historical long time, but the literary structureof the epic, and Perspectives on Deodands, Forfeitures, Wrongful thereforethe context of the flood story, was not under- Death and the Western Notion of Sovereignty" stood until Laessoe reconstructedthe work(J. Laessoe, Temple Law Quarterly 46/2 (1973) 169-290 demon- "The Atrahasis Epic, A Babylonian History of strates an interest in and mastery of the entire field Mankind," Biblioteca Orientalis 13 [1956] 90-102). In of History of Law. Although Finkelstein would not 1965, Lambert and Millard (Cuneiform Texts from have considered himself a biblicist, he had a deep Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum, London) interest in the Bible, particularly in the relationship publishedmany additional texts fromthe epic, including of biblical law and religion to Mesopotamian an Old Babylonian copy (written around 1650 B.C.E.) culture. His insights in this area were so numerous which is our most completesurviving recension of the and perceptive that many biblicists came to Yale to tale. These new texts greatlyincreased our knowledge sit in on his classes and to discuss their ideas with of the epic and served as the foundation for the English him. His death is thus a deep loss to everyone edition of the Epic by Lambert and Millard (Atrahasis: interested in the development of biblical and The Babylonian Story of the Flood, Oxford, 1969). Western culture. A complete bibliography of The Atrahasis epic starts with a depiction of the Finkelstein's publications has been compiled by world as it existed before man was created: "When the Peter Machinist and Norman Yoffee and appears in gods worked like Man" (the first line and ancient title Essays on the Ancient Near East in Memory of of the composition). At this time the universe was Jacob Joel Finkelstein, Memoirs of the Connecticut divided among the great gods, with An taking the Academy of Arts and Sciences, vol. 19, Dec. 1977. heavens, Enlil the earth and Enki the great deep. Seven gods (called the Anunnaki in this text) established 148 DECEMBER1977 This content downloaded from 130.58.65.10 on Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:21:01 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions themselves as the ruling class, while the rest of the gods same problem recurs, and the gods bring famine (and provided the work force. These gods, whose "work was saline soil), which again do not end the difficulties. At heavy, (whose) distress was much," dug the Tigris and last Enlil persuades the gods to adopt a "final solution" Euphrates rivers and then rebelled, refusing to continue (II viii 34) to the human problem, and they resolve to their labors. On the advice of Enki, the gods decided to bring a flood to destroy mankind. Their plan is create a substitute to do the work of the gods, and Enki thwarted by Enki, who has Atrahasis build an ark and and the mother goddess created man from clay and so escape the flood. After the rest of mankind have from the flesh and blood of a slain god, "We-ilu, a god been destroyed, and after the gods have had occasion who has sense," from whom man was to gain ration- to regret their actions and to realize (by their thirst and ality.
Recommended publications
  • Burn Your Way to Success Studies in the Mesopotamian Ritual And
    Burn your way to success Studies in the Mesopotamian Ritual and Incantation Series Šurpu by Francis James Michael Simons A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham March 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The ritual and incantation series Šurpu ‘Burning’ is one of the most important sources for understanding religious and magical practice in the ancient Near East. The purpose of the ritual was to rid a sufferer of a divine curse which had been inflicted due to personal misconduct. The series is composed chiefly of the text of the incantations recited during the ceremony. These are supplemented by brief ritual instructions as well as a ritual tablet which details the ceremony in full. This thesis offers a comprehensive and radical reconstruction of the entire text, demonstrating the existence of a large, and previously unsuspected, lacuna in the published version. In addition, a single tablet, tablet IX, from the ten which comprise the series is fully edited, with partitur transliteration, eclectic and normalised text, translation, and a detailed line by line commentary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Book of Enki.Pdf
    L0ST BOOK °f6NK1 ZECHARIA SITCHIN author of The 12th Planet • . FICTION/MYTHOLOGY $24.00 TH6 LOST BOOK OF 6NK! Will the past become our future? Is humankind destined to repeat the events that occurred on another planet, far away from Earth? Zecharia Sitchin’s bestselling series, The Earth Chronicles, provided humanity’s side of the story—as recorded on ancient clay tablets and other Sumerian artifacts—concerning our origins at the hands of the Anunnaki, “those who from heaven to earth came.” In The Lost Book of Enki, we can view this saga from a dif- ferent perspective through this richly con- ceived autobiographical account of Lord Enki, an Anunnaki god, who tells the story of these extraterrestrials’ arrival on Earth from the 12th planet, Nibiru. The object of their colonization: gold to replenish the dying atmosphere of their home planet. Finding this precious metal results in the Anunnaki creation of homo sapiens—the human race—to mine this important resource. In his previous works, Sitchin com- piled the complete story of the Anunnaki ’s impact on human civilization in peacetime and in war from the frag- ments scattered throughout Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Hittite, Egyptian, Canaanite, and Hebrew sources- —the “myths” of all ancient peoples in the old world as well as the new. Missing from these accounts, however, was the perspective of the Anunnaki themselves What was life like on their own planet? What motives propelled them to settle on Earth—and what drove them from their new home? Convinced of the existence of a now lost book that formed the basis of THE lost book of ENKI MFMOHCS XND PKjOPHeCieS OF XN eXTfCXUfCWJTWXL COD 2.6CHXPJA SITCHIN Bear & Company Rochester, Vermont — Bear & Company One Park Street Rochester, Vermont 05767 www.InnerTraditions.com Copyright © 2002 by Zecharia Sitchin All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Serpent Symbols and Salvation in the Ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon
    Journal of Book of Mormon Studies Volume 10 Number 2 Article 8 7-31-2001 Serpent Symbols and Salvation in the Ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon Andrew C. Skinner Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Skinner, Andrew C. (2001) "Serpent Symbols and Salvation in the Ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies: Vol. 10 : No. 2 , Article 8. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jbms/vol10/iss2/8 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Book of Mormon Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Serpent Symbols and Salvation in the Ancient Near East and the Book of Mormon Author(s) Andrew C. Skinner Reference Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 10/2 (2001): 42–55, 70–71. ISSN 1065-9366 (print), 2168-3158 (online) Abstract The serpent is often used to represent one of two things: Christ or Satan. This article synthesizes evi- dence from Egypt, Mesopotamia, Phoenicia, Greece, and Jerusalem to explain the reason for this duality. Many scholars suggest that the symbol of the serpent was used anciently to represent Jesus Christ but that Satan distorted the symbol, thereby creating this para- dox. The dual nature of the serpent is incorporated into the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Book of Mormon. erpent ymbols & SSalvation in the ancient near east and the book of mormon andrew c.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesopotamian Mythology
    MESOPOTAMIAN MYTHOLOGY The myths, epics, hymns, lamentations, penitential psalms, incantations, wisdom literature, and handbooks dealing with rituals and omens of ancient Mesopotamian. The literature that has survived from Mesopotamian was written primarily on stone or clay tablets. The production and preservation of written documents were the responsibility of scribes who were associated with the temples and the palace. A sharp distinction cannot be made between religious and secular writings. The function of the temple as a food redistribution center meant that even seemingly secular shipping receipts had a religious aspect. In a similar manner, laws were perceived as given by the gods. Accounts of the victories of the kings often were associated with the favor of the gods and written in praise of the gods. The gods were also involved in the established and enforcement of treaties between political powers of the day. A large group of texts related to the interpretations of omens has survived. Because it was felt that the will of the gods could be known through the signs that the gods revealed, care was taken to collect ominous signs and the events which they preached. If the signs were carefully observed, negative future events could be prevented by the performance of appropriate apotropaic rituals. Among the more prominent of the Texts are the shumma izbu texts (“if a fetus…”) which observe the birth of malformed young of both animals and humans. Later a similar series of texts observed the physical characteristics of any person. There are also omen observations to guide the physician in the diagnosis and treatment of patients.
    [Show full text]
  • NABU 2021 1 Compilé 09 Corr DC
    ISSN 0989-5671 2021 N° 1 (mars) NOTES BRÈVES 1) Ebla: how many years? — Essays on Ebla by the philologists who collaborate with the Archaeological Expedition to Ebla of the University of Rome – La Sapienza are published rather frequently, one after the other. They concern a society which is different in some way from those studied by other specialists of third millennium B.C. Ebla is something like a New World: personal names and many geographic names sound alien to these colleagues; some documentary forms are unusual; the lexicon coincides in large part, but not completely, with that of the Mesopotamian documents; Sumerian names are applied to local deities. No one can follow everything and must therefore rely (sometimes perhaps with a grain of salt) on what Eblaitologists say. Too many things are not as clear as one would wish, but this is what stimulates research. The situation becomes uncomfortable, however, if Eblaitologists disagree with each other on some basic features. This predicament is evident comparing the two essays, which in some way also concern Ebla, that appear in The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East I (K. Radner ed.), New York 2020, an opus intended to replace the glorious Cambridge Ancient History, as far as the Ancient Near East is concerned. V. Bartash, author of chapter 8, “The Early Dynastic Near East”, gives a concise picture of the Ebla state basing himself on the interpretations offered by the philologists of the Ebla Expedition (Bartash 2020: 579–583). P. Michalowski, author of chapter 10, “The kingdom
    [Show full text]
  • MESOPOTAMIAN MAGIC in TEXT and PERFORMANCE Sam Mirelman
    ACCEPTED PRE-PROOF: BOOK CHAPTER IN: S. PANAYOTOV, U. STEINERT AND L. VACÍN (EDS.), MAGIC AND MEDICINE IN MESOPOTAMIA. FESTSCHRIFT FOR M. J. GELLER. ANCIENT MAGIC AND DIVINATION SERIES. BRILL (2018). - HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1163/9789004368088_018 DOWNLOADED FROM SOAS RESEARCH ONLINE - HTTPS://EPRINTS.SOAS.AC.UK/30220 MESOPOTAMIAN MAGIC IN TEXT AND PERFORMANCE Sam Mirelman Any representation of an action or utterance in written form is, by definition, never a full reflection of its actual performance.1 Indeed, our knowledge of Mesopotamian magic, as it existed in performance, will always be partial and incomplete. This is a result of the simple fact that our knowledge of the practice of Mesopotamian magic is channeled mainly through the medium of text. 2 Assuming a written representation serves as a record of an existing ritual practice, it must be approached as a selective account of specific aspects of a ritual, which were deemed necessary to be written down, in a specific time, place and context.3 In addition, we cannot assume that a ritual text4 or written recitation merely records a practice which existed before it was written down; the action or recitation may have been composed initially in writing, by means of a combination of observation and writing, or with reference to an oral tradition. Following the initial writing of an incantation or ritual text, the composition represented by the text may have been transmitted in writing and/or orally. Similarly, the composition may have been performed with a full or partial reference to a text, a version of it, or as a purely or partially oral tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumerian Religion
    1 אנשר אנשר (באכדית: Anshar או Anshur, מילולית:"ציר השמיים") הוא אל שמים מסופוטמי קדום. הוא מתואר כבן זוגה של אחותו קישאר. הזוג יחדיו מציינים את השמים (ההברה אן) והארץ (ההברה קי) במיתוס הבריאה אנומה אליש והם נמנים עם הדור השני לבריאה, ילדיהם של המפלצות לחמו (Lahmu) ולחאמו (Lahamu) ונכדיהם של תיאמת (Tiamat) ואפסו (Apsu), המסמנים את המים המלוחים והמתוקים בהתאמה. בתורם, הם בעצמם הוריו של אל שמים אחר בשם אנו (Anu). החל מימי סרגון השני, החלו האשורים לזהות את אנשר עם אשור בגירסתם למיתוס הבריאה, בגרסה זו בת זוגו היא נינ-ליל (NinLil). ערך זה הוא קצרמר בנושא מיתולוגיה. אתם מוזמנים לתרום לוויקיפדיה ו להרחיב אותו [1]. האל אנשר עומד על פר, נתגלה בחפירות העיר אשור הפניות editintro=%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%AA%3A%D7%A7%D7%A6%D7%A8%D7%9E%D7%A8%2F%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%97%D7%91%D7%94&action=edit&http://he.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D7%90%D7%A0%D7%A9%D7%A8 [1] המקורות והתורמים לערך 2 המקורות והתורמים לערך אנשר מקור: https://he.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=13750401 תורמים: GuySh, Ori, רועים המקורות, הרישיונות והתורמים לתמונה קובץ:Asur-Stier.PNG מקור: https://he.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=קובץ:Asur-Stier.PNG רישיון: Public Domain תורמים: Evil berry, Foroa, Gryffindor תמונה:Perseus-slays-medusa.jpg מקור: https://he.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=קובץ:Perseus-slays-medusa.jpg רישיון: GNU Free Documentation License תורמים: Bibi Saint-Pol, Editor at Large, Funfood, G.dallorto, Jastrow, Lokal Profil, Peter Andersen, Sreejithk2000 AWB, 4 עריכות אלמוניות רישיון Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 /creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0// Anu 1 Anu This article is about a myth.
    [Show full text]
  • ANE Deities Compared Genesis 1-11 the Babylonians and Akkadians Adopted the Sumerian Pantheon with Little Changes
    ANE Deities Compared Genesis 1-11 The Babylonians and Akkadians adopted the Sumerian pantheon with little changes. Gods were often renamed but their role and status in the pantheon generally remained the same. The dominance of Babylon, however, also led to the ascendancy of the god of Babylon: Marduk assumed power over An, Enlil, and Enki. Sumerian Aspect of Deity Babylonian/Akkadian An God of the heavens Anu Enlil God of the earth and air Enlil / Ellil Enki God of water; Ea god of wisdom and magic Ninhursag (Nimmah, Nintu, Ki) Mother-goddess Aruru Nanna-Sin Moon god Sin Utu Sun God; Shamash god of justice Ereshkigal Goddess of the underworld Nergal Ishkur Storm god Marduk (Adad, Ashur, Bel) Abzu Primordial sweet-water ocean Apsu (Enki’s abode) Nanshe The salt-water ocean Tiamat1 Dumuzi God of vegetation; god of the Tammuz underworld; shepherd god Inanna Fertility goddess; Ishtar goddess of love and war Ashnan God of grain Dagan Nidaba, Nisaba God of scribes, literacy, Nabu and wisdom Anunnaki2 Lesser gods, workers Anunnaki, Igigi2 Blue = the supreme gods (highest of the seven primary gods) Red = additional members of the seven primary gods Green = other important gods 1 Enuma Elish tells the story of Marduk’s victory over the sea monster Tiamat. 2 Anunnaki and Igigi are both collective terms for a group of otherwise nameless gods. It is uncertain whether or not they stand for the same group of gods. The Anunnaki seem to hold a higher position. Chart inspired by G. Herbert Livingston, The Pentateuch and Its Cultural Environment (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • BABYLONIAN CREATION from the Enuma Elish, 2050-1750 BC
    BABYLONIAN CREATION From the Enuma Elish, 2050-1750 BC Before anything had a name, before there was firm ground or sky or the sun and moon there was Apsu, the sweet water sea and Tiamat, the salt water sea. When these two seas mingled, they created the gods Lahmu and Lahamu, who rose from the silt at the edge of the water. When Lahmu and Lahamu joined, they created the great gods Anshar, Kishar and Anu. From this generation of gods there arose mighty Ea and his many brothers. Ea and his brothers were restless - they surged over the waters day and night. Neither Apsu nor Tiamat could get any rest. They tried to plead with the gods to tread softly, but powerful Ea didn’t hear them. Apsu decided the only way to have some peace was to destroy Ea and his brothers. He began to plot their demise with some of the first generation gods. But Ea heard of their plans and struck him down first. This began a war among the gods. Tiamat was furious that her mate was killed, and she began producing great and ferocious monsters to slay Ea and his brothers. She created poisonous dragons and demons and serpents. She created the Viper, the Sphinx, the Lion, the Mad Dog and Scorpion Man. The chief of them all was called Kingu. He led the army of Tiamat’s monsters into heaven against Ea and his brothers to avenge Apsu’s death. While Tiamat fashioned her army, Ea and the goddess Damkina created the great god Marduk.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Patterns in the Chaos: Woman As Chaos Agent in Creation Myths Amanda Vajskop Denison University
    Denison Journal of Religion Volume 5 Article 7 2005 Finding Patterns in the Chaos: Woman as Chaos Agent in Creation Myths Amanda Vajskop Denison University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, and the Sociology of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Vajskop, Amanda (2005) "Finding Patterns in the Chaos: Woman as Chaos Agent in Creation Myths," Denison Journal of Religion: Vol. 5 , Article 7. Available at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion/vol5/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Denison Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denison Journal of Religion by an authorized editor of Denison Digital Commons. Vajskop: Finding Patterns in the Chaos: Woman as Chaos Agent in Creation M THE DENISON JOURNAL of RELIGION Finding Patterns in the Chaos: Woman as Chaos Agent in Creation Myths Amanda Vajskop y Catholic upbringing emphasized that women have two choices, two role models to emulate. There is the impossible virgin mother, Mwho is symbolic of women’s “good qualities” (obedience, pu- rity, selflessness, nurturing). Then there is Eve. She is the woman supposedly responsible for the downfall of “man” and it is to her that we attribute death – God’s punishment to humanity after the fall. She becomes a chaos agent and symbolic embodiment of women’s “bad” qualities – willfulness, independence, curiosity and disobedience that disrupts (creates chaos in) the supposed order of God’s creation. Not only in Genesis do we find the pattern of woman as chaos agent; in fact, this theme is found in many creation myths from many different cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesopotamian Gods and the Bull
    ARTÍCULO / ARTICLE Sociedades Precapitalistas, vol. 8, nº 1, e030, diciembre 2018. ISSN 2250-5121 Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Centro de Estudios de Sociedades Precapitalistas (CESP) Mesopotamian Gods and the Bull Renate Marian van Dijk-Coombes * Stellenbosch University, Sudáfrica [email protected] Cita sugerida: van Dijk-Coombes, R. M. (2018). Mesopotamian Gods and the Bull. Sociedades Precapitalistas, 8(1), e030. https://doi.org/10.24215/22505121e030 Recibido: 16 agosto 2018 - Aceptado: 13 noviembre 2018 - Publicado: 07 diciembre 2018 Esta obra está bajo licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es_AR PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Sociedades Precapitalistas, vol. 8, nº 1, e030, diciembre 2018. ISSN 2250-5121 Mesopotamian Gods and the Bull Los dioses mesopotámicos y el toro Renate Marian van Dijk-Coombes Stellenbosch University, Sudáfrica [email protected] Abstract: In Mesopotamia, gods were associated with the bull from at least the Early Dynastic Period until the Neo-Babylonian or Chaldean Period. This relationship took on many forms – the bull could serve as the god’s divine animal, the god could be likened to the bull, or he could actually take on the form of the beast. In this paper, the various gods identified with or related to the bull will be identified and studied in order to identify which specific types of god were most commonly and especially associated with the bull. The relationships between the gods and the bull are evident in textual as well as iconographic sources, although fewer instances of this connection are found in iconography.
    [Show full text]
  • Did the Bible Borrow Its Creation Story?
    Did the Bible Borrow Its Creation Story? Hi there, my name is Tim Perry, pastor of Spiritual Discovery at Christ Community Church – and I want to welcome you to week one of Tough Questions. As you read through your Bible, the first story that you encounter is the story of creation, and it’s probably one the most interesting stories you are going to read in the entire Bible. It raises so many questions for us. One of the questions I want to deal with in this video blog has to do with how unique that story is. Could the Bible have borrowed its story from other ancient creation mythologies? When you study mythologies, you realize right away that there are hundreds and hundreds of them. A researcher by the name of Dr. David Leeming has written a two-volume encyclopedia of creation mythologies. He details over 214 creation mythologies from – and with so many pluralistic options available to us, how do we know that the Christian story is true? How do we know that it’s utterly unique? Well, what I want to do in the next couple of minutes – is compare a couple of ancient creation mythologies that are similar to Christianity’s story, but somewhat different and see what we learn about how unique the Bible’s account of creation actually is. Let’s go over to the white board to do that. Here is our comparison chart. We’re going to take a look at the creation account out of Genesis and compare it to these two other Mesopotamian creation mythologies.
    [Show full text]