Chernobyl Sufferers in Ukraine and Their Social Problems: Short Outline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chernobyl Sufferers in Ukraine and Their Social Problems: Short Outline Chernobyl Sufferers in Ukraine and Their Social Problems: Short Outline Volodymyr TYKHYI Environmental Education and Information Center POB 136, Kyiv 245070, Ukraine; [email protected] 1. INTRODUCTION. Such slogans were patriotic, but politically neutral and 1.1. Change of nationhood and political system in thus safer then direct appeals to independence. Major Ukraine after the accident. political forces were using issues like consequences of Chernobyl disaster, secrecy around this problem, At the moment of the Chernobyl NPP catastrophe absence of real consultations with sufferers to prove Ukraine was one of 15 republics of the Union of Soviet the necessity of real changes of the state system. Socialist Republics (USSR, or Soviet Union). Ukraine Soviet Union was facing extremely severe was the second biggest republic (population 51 economic problems in 80-s, caused by the lasting million) after Russia (population 144 million in 1986). Afghanistan war, huge expenses for armament race Soviet Union was a strongly centralised state with one and dramatic 1985 drop in world crude oil prices - one and very powerful ruling Communist Party (CPSU), of the main export commodities and the source of hard which dominated in all structures - governments, local currency income. authorities, army, businesses, culture, society as a Chernobyl disaster, mitigation of impacts of which whole. required huge material and labour investments played Formally republics were self-governed, but in an important role in developing economic crisis. reality all important decisions were taken in Moscow Victims of radiation increased the number of suffering by the Central Committee of CPSU and the so called people which needed urgent help - like invalids of Union Government. All management system was Afghanistan war, like victims of military conflicts in known as “command and control”. The backbone of Azerbaijan, refugees from Georgia, sufferers of Spitak vertical authority was the Communist Party earthquake in Armenia, population in the area of Aral committees of all levels - Central, Republic, Oblast, sea. district. There were also party committees at In August 1991, after the unsuccessful attempt of a enterprises, organisations, villages and city quarters, coup-d’etat in Moscow, Ukrainian Verkhovna Rada which controlled implementation of decisions of (Parliament) proclaimed the Act of Sovereignty of higher levels. All resources, including financial - for Ukraine. The communist party lost its role and in less industries, housing, food etc. - were distributed by than a year the USSR has disintegrated. Ukraine had central government in Moscow. Local governments become an independent state with full responsibility and industries were lobbying interests of their regions for all positive and negative issues, including the and enterprises in Moscow. legacy of Chernobyl catastrophe. Actually the only one way of influencing the state First and subsequent governments of independent (and at that time everything was state!) policy was Ukraine faced enormous problems with liquidation of raising an issue at the meeting of a low-level party Chernobyl consequences. These problems were committee. Of course, only ideas supported by high exacerbated by enormous inflation during 1992-1995 level party authorities had some chances to be and general breakdown of national economy due to implemented. various reasons. Rapidly decreasing quality of life of In 1985 a new and dynamic leader of CPSU, all population did not allow for proper measures to Mikhail Gorbachev launched “perestroyka” - protect those for suffered from Chernobyl. It is hard to reconstruction of the whole system. This had lead to a judge whether there existed adequate political will and substantial weakening of the authority of Communist capacities to sort out the problems and properly solve Party. One important feature of perestroyka was them. “glasnost” - opportunity to publicly express one’s opinion, reveal information etc. This opportunity was 1.2. Sufferers from Chernobyl catastrophe used to disclose facts and consequences of Chernobyl a) liquidation of the consequences of disaster: disaster, and eventually to make this problem an issue “liquidators” of a public policy. Glasnost was used by active The first statement about Chernobyl catastrophe political forces in republics, first of all Baltic from the USSR Council of Ministers said “An accident republics, to begin a struggle for independence. has taken place at the Chernobyl power station, and Similar movements began also in Ukraine, Bielarus one of the reactors was damaged. Measures are being and other republics. Very often “green” slogans taken to eliminate the consequences of the accident”. (protests against nuclear power plants, polluting industries) were first in programs of these movements. 235 Those who “were taking measures” are the first big zone they were doing what was needed - but being category of sufferers - “liquidators”. dressed in military uniform. The first who immediately was affected by reactor As it is clear from above mentioned, people were # 4 explosion was personnel of Chernobyl NPP and draft from all parts of Soviet empire - and eventually fire brigades - many of theses people died, and dispersed on its wide spreads. No one knows exact hundreds lost their health. Urgent measures to prevent figures - how many “liquidators” worked in further aggravation of disaster involved thousands of Chernobyl. Some estimates give numbers around other specialists and workers. For example, to cool and 600,000. According to the recent data, in Ukraine live strengthen the basement of reactor building a tunnel about 180,000 liquidators. And, of course, much less is under the damaged reactor was dug by miners from known about liquidators’ radiation doses. Donetsk oblast - hundreds of them are suffering now b) population from different diseases. To dampen the fire and The second huge category of the sufferers is contain the radioactivity, 5 thousand tons of lead, population - we will speak of Ukraine. First of all, boron and sand had been dropped from helicopters in these were people of nearby cities and villages. the heart of the burning reactor this meant irradiation Immediate victims became those who had rest or work among pilots and others who participated in this out of houses. Some of them contracted even acute operation. radiation diseases, radiation burns - and all received During May-November 1986 a giant construction enormous doses of iodine on thyroid glands. But this of sarcophagus was erected. To build it out of more was only the beginning - they lost their houses, than 400,000 cubic meters of concrete, 7,000 tons of property, jobs, their native land, after all. steel tens of thousands of construction workers, The 50,000 population of the city of Pripyat was engineers, drivers were drafted to work just near the evacuated two days after the accident, and in later debris of unit 4, where radiation levels were very high. months and years still more people were forced to The deadly decision to start again reactor # 3, leave their homes. People were resettled to newly situated on the same basement with # 4 and sharing a constructed villages, many found shelter with their lot of vital communications, had led to over-irradiation relatives and friend all over Ukraine. They lived as of thousands of workers who constructed necessary refugees, very often in unfriendly surrounding - some walls and rearranged thousands of pipelines and illiterate men looked at evacuated as lepers. electric circuits. Evacuation from contaminated areas continued for Of course, all these men working at the reactor 4 many years. Plan of Ukrainian Council of Ministers for and around needed food, housing, transportation etc. 1990-1991 previewed evacuation of 45,000 people Army and militia (police) regiments were guarding the from contaminated zones. On contaminated territories fenced out 30-km exclusion zone. Most of them had of Ukraine in 1990 lived about 1,5 million people. All only basic understanding of what’s happening and of them were suffering from Chernobyl. often their doses were very high. People in contaminated areas were not allowed to During the years after the accident buildings, roads, eat wild berries and mushrooms (and this is the machines and equipment needed permanent territory where traditionally “gifts of woods” are very desactivation - and again this involved hundreds of important part of diet), they were not allowed to use drivers, dosimetrists, washers. In the course of milk of their cows and goats, and the traditional desactivation houses in tens of villages were economy of collective-farms producing milk, meat, demolished and buried, and all the so called “red potato, linen collapsed. forest” (hundreds of hectares) adjacent to the power It is hard to say whether evacuated people were in a plant, was cut and buried in specially dug huge ditches. better situation than those living in contaminated areas People needed food and basic services, so logistical (except some limited number of NPP personnel and problems were solved on the highest level - in other privileged categories, who received comfortable Moscow, with involved tens of thousands people lived apartments in Kyiv and other big cities). The quality of at a time in the city of Chernobyl 30 km from nuclear new settlements, built for the evacuated under a big power plant. The biggest canteen in Chernobyl, time pressure was often very low, and many people organised in a huge ward constructed
Recommended publications
  • Ukraine and the Yugoslav Conflict
    Nationalities Papers, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1997 UKRAINE AND THE YUGOSLAV CONFLICT Taras Kuzio Even before gaining independence in December 1991 from the former USSR, Ukraine had supported Slovenia and Croatia's drive to independence from the former Yugoslavia. In May 1991, Croatian President Franjo Tudjman paid an official visit to Ukraine where then parliamentary speaker Leonid Kravchuk expressed sympathy with Croatia's desire for independence. Tudjman pointed out how Ukraine's seat at the United Nations had given it a head start in obtaining international recognition of its independent status. On 12 December 1991, twelve days after the Ukrainian referendum on independence, Kyiv became one of the first states to diplomatically recognise Croatia and Slovenia; and further, it announced its readiness to open embassies in both countries.1 Ukraine was the first member of the U.N. to recognise Croatia; the second and third countries, Slovenia and Lithuania, were not members of the U.N. when they recognised Croatia. Ukraine's motives were quite clear early on vis-a-vis Yugoslavia. First, it wanted to reaffirm its independent status as a new international state. Secondly, Kyiv desired to distance itself from Russian sympathy with Serbia and Yugoslavia2 in order to show the outside world—particularly at that stage, the sceptical West—that Ukraine and Russia were indeed different peoples and nations.3 Fourthly, Ukraine desired to show the outside world that it was a respectable and co-operative member of the international community. Finally, a majority of the Ukrainian leadership sympathised with the Croats and Slovenes in their drive to independence, comparing it to Ukraine's quest to divorce itself from Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Local and Regional Government in Ukraine and the Development of Cooperation Between Ukraine and the EU
    Local and regional government in Ukraine and the development of cooperation between Ukraine and the EU The report was written by the Aston Centre for Europe - Aston University. It does not represent the official views of the Committee of the Regions. More information on the European Union and the Committee of the Regions is available on the internet at http://www.europa.eu and http://www.cor.europa.eu respectively. Catalogue number: QG-31-12-226-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-895-0627-4 DOI: 10.2863/59575 © European Union, 2011 Partial reproduction is allowed, provided that the source is explicitly mentioned Table of Contents 1 PART ONE .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of local and regional government in Ukraine ................................ 3 1.3 Ukraine’s constitutional/legal frameworks for local and regional government 7 1.4 Competences of local and regional authorities............................................... 9 1.5 Electoral democracy at the local and regional level .....................................11 1.6 The extent and nature of fiscal decentralisation in Ukraine .........................15 1.7 The extent and nature of territorial reform ...................................................19 1.8 The politics of Ukrainian administrative reform plans.................................21 1.8.1 Position of ruling government ..................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Present and Future Environmental Impact of the Chernobyl Accident
    IAEA-TECDOC-1240 Present and future environmental impact of the Chernobyl accident Study monitored by an International Advisory Committee under the project management of the Institut de protection et de sûreté nucléaire (IPSN), France August 2001 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Waste Safety Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria PRESENT AND FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT IAEA, VIENNA, 2001 IAEA-TECDOC-1240 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2001 Printed by the IAEA in Austria August 2001 FOREWORD The environmental impact of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident has been extensively investigated by scientists in the countries affected and by international organizations. Assessment of the environmental contamination and the resulting radiation exposure of the population was an important part of the International Chernobyl Project in 1990–1991. This project was designed to assess the measures that the then USSR Government had taken to enable people to live safely in contaminated areas, and to evaluate the measures taken to safeguard human health there. It was organized by the IAEA under the auspices of an International Advisory Committee with the participation of the Commission of the European Communities (CEC), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the International Labour Organisation (ILO), the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The IAEA has also been engaged in further studies in this area through projects such as the one on validation of environmental model predictions (VAMP) and through its technical co-operation programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chernobyl Liquidator Medal—An Educational Essay
    Article Chernobyl’s Lesser Known Design Flaw: The Chernobyl Liquidator Medal—An Educational Essay Michael McIntire * and John Luczaj Department of Natural & Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Green Bay, Green Bay, WI 54311, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-920-465-5131 Received: 26 June 2019; Accepted: 7 August 2019; Published: 9 August 2019 Abstract: The honorary Chernobyl Liquidator Medal depicts pathways of alpha, gamma, and beta rays over a drop of blood, signifying the human health impacts of the Chernobyl accident. A relativistic analysis of the trajectories depicted on the Chernobyl Liquidator Medal is conducted assuming static uniform magnetic and electric fields. The parametric trajectories are determined using the energies of alpha (α) and beta (β) particles relevant to the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident and compared with the trajectories depicted on the liquidator medal. For minimum alpha particle velocity of 0.0512c, the beta particle trajectory depicted on the medal is highly unlikely to have come from a naturally occurring nuclear decay process. The parametric equations are used to determine the necessary beta energies to reproduce the depicted trajectories. This article documents the unfortunate misrepresentation of a famous scientific experiment on an honorary medal and illustrates the importance of better communication between artists and scientists. Keywords: Chernobyl; liquidator; medal; radiation; trajectories; physics; design 1. Introduction 1.1. The Chernobyl Power Station Accident and the Liquidators With near universal acceptance of global climate change by today’s scientific community, coupled with a looming energy shortage as carbon-based fuels become increasingly limited, there has been a revitalization of nuclear energy throughout much of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • WTO Documents Online
    WORLD TRADE RESTRICTED WT/ACC/UKR/110 24 October 2002 ORGANIZATION (02-5874) Working Party on the Accession of Ukraine ACCESSION OF UKRAINE Check-list of Issues In response to an invitation at the last meeting of the Working Party on the Accession of Ukraine, members submitted specific proposals, comments and suggestions including, the commitments expected from Ukraine for inclusion in a consolidated check-list of issues. The specific responses of the Governmental Commission on Ukraine's accession to the WTO to each of the issues in the check-list are reproduced hereunder. The annexes mentioned in the responses are reproduced in document WT/ACC/UKR/110/Add.1 _______________ WT/ACC/UKR/110 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS General Comments ................................................................................................................................1 II. ECONOMY, ECONOMIC POLICIES AND FOREIGN TRADE .....................................3 2. Economic Policies......................................................................................................................3 (a) Main direction of ongoing economic policies..........................................................................3 IV. POLICIES AFFECTING TRADE IN GOODS ...................................................................14 1. Import Regulation...................................................................................................................14 (a) Registration requirements for engaging in importing.........................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Project
    Report on the Project: Dimensions, Opportunities and Benefits of Ukraine - NATO Relations. Impact of NATO Enlargement on Ukraine’s Foreign Policy Process NATO - EAPC Research Fellowship Programme, 1999 – 2001 By Dr. Sergiy Tolstov, Supervisory Research Fellow, Institute of World Economy and International Relations, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, and Director of the Institute for Political Analysis and International Studies 28 June 2001, Kyiv (Ukraine) 2 Conents: 1. Introduction 2. Dimensions of European and Euro-Atlantic Security Cooperation (concepts and scenarios) 2.1. The New World Order 2.2. Strategic Approaches and Perceptions 2.3. Towards the New European Security Architecture 3. The Internal Factors and Features of Ukraine’s Development in the Context of European Transformation Processes 3.1. General Trends 3.2. Constitutional Referendum 2000 and Political Opposition 3.3. The Tapegate Affair 3.4. Situation in the System of Power 4. Monitoring of Domestic Debates on Foreign Policy Matters. 4.1. The Foreign Policy Concept 4.2. Peculiarities of the National Foreign Policy Process 4.3. Parliamentary Debates and the 1999 Presidential Elections 4.4. Security Issues in the Domestic Political Discussion 5. Impact of Ukraine - NATO Cooperation on Ukraine’s Foreign Policy. 5.1. Developing Ukraine – NATO Partnership 5.2. Ukraine’s Security Prospects in the Context of NATO Enlargement 5.3. State Programme for Cooperation of Ukraine with NATO, 1998 - 2001 5.4. State Programme for Cooperation of Ukraine with NATO, 2001-2004 6. Tendencies of International Relations in Central Eastern Europe 6.1. Results of Transformations in the Central Eastern Europe and the Post-Soviet Space 6.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Annoucements of Conducting Procurement Procedures
    Bulletin No�24(98) June 12, 2012 Annoucements of conducting 13443 Ministry of Health of Ukraine procurement procedures 7 Hrushevskoho St., 01601 Kyiv Chervatiuk Volodymyr Viktorovych tel.: (044) 253–26–08; 13431 National Children’s Specialized Hospital e–mail: [email protected] “Okhmatdyt” of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: 28/1 Chornovola St., 01135 Kyiv www.tender.me.gov.ua Povorozniuk Volodymyr Stepanovych Procurement subject: code 24.42.1 – medications (Imiglucerase in flasks, tel.: (044) 236–30–05 400 units), 319 pcs. Website of the Authorized agency which contains information on procurement: Supply/execution: 29 Berezniakivska St., 02098 Kyiv; during 2012 www.tender.me.gov.ua Procurement procedure: open tender Procurement subject: code 24.42.1 – medications, 72 lots Obtaining of competitive bidding documents: at the customer’s address, office 138 Supply/execution: at the customer’s address; July – December 2012 Submission: at the customer’s address, office 138 Procurement procedure: open tender 29.06.2012 10:00 Obtaining of competitive bidding documents: at the customer’s address, Opening of tenders: at the customer’s address, office 138 economics department 29.06.2012 12:00 Submission: at the customer’s address, economics department Tender security: bank guarantee, deposit, UAH 260000 26.06.2012 10:00 Terms of submission: 90 days; not returned according to part 3, article 24 of the Opening of tenders: at the customer’s address, office of the deputy general Law on Public Procurement director of economic issues Additional information: For additional information, please, call at 26.06.2012 11:00 tel.: (044) 253–26–08, 226–20–86.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-84025-5 — Remaking Ukraine after World War II Filip Slaveski Excerpt More Information Introduction There’s no point in rebuilding that collective farm. There’s no village there, the farm worked poorly in the past and the soil is bad. What’s worse, the people there aren’t even real kolkhozniki – they’re just rotten. Soviet official, Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine, 19481 This is a history of ‘rotten’ people. Thousands of them returned victorious from fighting against the Germans in World War II to their ‘bad soil’ in Soviet Ukraine from 1945, but had to keep fighting until the end of that decade. Now they were fighting against their own Soviet government, which obstructed them from rebuilding their villages, farms and what remained of their pre-war lives. These people were not wartime collabor- ators, forced labourers or other ‘traitorous’ Soviet citizens whom officials normally discriminated against and slandered after the war. Numerous works have been published on their experiences.2 The people whom authorities called ‘rotten’ were decorated war veterans and committed kolkhozniki, whom authorities were supposed to assist in, not obstruct from, rebuilding post-war Soviet society. This book examines the struggle between these ‘rotten’ people and the authorities, which reveals a new fault line in the restoration of Soviet control in parts of the Ukrainian country- side after World War II. The Soviet society that re-emerged in these areas shook chaotically along this fault line in ways we are only beginning to understand. 1 Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History (Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi arkhiv sotsial0no-poli- ticheskoi istorii – RGASPI) f.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF: Transforming Chernobyl
    The works to transform Chernobyl into a safe and on the ground. Total costs for the Shelter secure state are nearing conclusion. The New Implementation Plan – of which the NSC is the Safe Confinement (NSC), a gigantic steel arch, most prominent element – were estimated to be has been erected and is now being equipped €2.1 billion in 2014, leaving a large funding gap with systems and tools to make the site safe for of €615 million. generations to come. The EBRD shareholders’ decision in November Impressive progress has been made and we are 2014 to commit an additional €350 million confident that the NSC will be completed and (from the Bank’s reserves) for the NSC and operational by the end of 2017. an anticipated €165 million from the G7/ European Commission have significantly The Chernobyl project would not have been reduced the funding gap. However, a shortfall of possible without the active involvement and €100 million remains. generous contributions of the international community and Ukraine. The fact that to date Ukraine is currently in a vulnerable state and more than 40 countries and the EBRD have cannot be left to bear this uniquely hazardous provided funds speaks for itself. burden alone. The EBRD welcomes the leadership of the G7 to secure the full funding As the project is now far-advanced it is possible of the project. to make a reliable cost estimate based on the final design of the NSC and the progress Suma Chakrabarti, EBRD President PART OF A LARGER The New Safe Confinement (NSC) is a structure intended to the international community’s work together with Ukraine cover the destroyed reactor unit 4 at Chernobyl, the site of got under way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 2010, No.21
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • Chicago-area Ukrainians protest Yanukovych policies – page 4. • UCC concerned about developments in Ukraine – page 9. • Nina Matvienko: the singing conscience of Ukraine – page 13. THEPublished U by theKRA Ukrainian NationalIN AssociationIAN Inc., a fraternal Wnon-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVIII No. 21 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MAY 23, 2010 $1/$2 in Ukraine Ukraine in danger: Administration Medvedev praises Yanukovych policies curtails freedom of assembly during state visit to Kyiv by Zenon Zawada erns Ukraine’s national police force, by Zenon Zawada It was Mr. Medvedev’s first visit in six Kyiv Press Bureau began demanding lists of participants Kyiv Press Bureau years to Kyiv after boycotting Ukraine dur- from the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc, the ing the presidency of Viktor Yushchenko, Ukraine in Danger: Ukraine’s civil opposition’s biggest force. KYIV – Russian Federation President whose cultural and foreign policies infuriat- society has begun to report on authoritar- “The new government considers a pro- Dmitry Medvedev visited the Ukrainian ed the Kremlin. The Russian president ian policies and rights abuses by the test meeting of democratic forces a crime, capital on May 17 and 18 to pursue his praised the policies of President Viktor administration of Viktor Yanukovych and based on which a criminal investigation nation’s fast-track policy of deepening the government led by Prime Minister has begun,” said Anatolii Semynoha, a cooperation and integration with Ukraine. (Continued on page 8) Mykola Azarov, which was formed on national deputy of the Tymoshenko Bloc. March 11 with the appointment of the In the few months since the Cabinet of Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident : Its Decommissioning, The
    The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident : its decommissioning, the Interim Spent Fuel Storage ISF-2, the nuclear waste treatment plants and the Safe Confinement project. by Dr. Ing. Fulcieri Maltini Ph.D. SMIEEE, life, PES, Comsoc FM Consultants Associates, France Keywords Nuclear power, Disaster engineering, Decommissioning, Waste management & disposal, Buildings, structures & design. Abstract On April 26, 1986, the Unit 4 of the RBMK nuclear power plant of Chernobyl, in Ukraine, went out of control during a test at low-power, leading to an explosion and fire. The reactor building was totally demolished and very large amounts of radiation were released into the atmosphere for several hundred miles around the site including the nearby town of Pripyat. The explosion leaving tons of nuclear waste and spent fuel residues without any protection and control. Several square kilometres were totally contaminated. Several hundred thousand people were affected by the radiation fall out. The radioactive cloud spread across Europe affecting most of the northern, eastern, central and southern Europe. The initiative of the G7 countries to launch an important programme for the closure of some Soviet built nuclear plants was accepted by several countries. A team of engineers was established within the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development were a fund was provided by the donor countries for the entire design, management of all projects and the plants decommissioning. The Chernobyl programme includes the establishment of a safety strategy for the entire site remediation and the planning for the plant decommissioning. Several facilities that will process and store the spent fuel and the radioactive liquid and solid waste as well as to protect the plant damaged structures have been designed and are under construction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities
    THE CONGRESS Appendix OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL T�e Sl�vut��� Appe�l AUTHORITIES l�un��ed �� t�e Inte�n�tion�l �onfe�en�e “��e�no��l 20 �e��s on lo��l �nd �egion�l �ut�o�ities de�ling wit� dis�ste�s” Resolution 215 (2006)1 Slavutych (Ukraine), 2-4 March 2006 on ��e�no��l 20 �e������s on lo��l We, �nd �egion�l �ut�o�ities de�ling wit� dis�ste�s The participants in the International Conference “Chernobyl, 20 years on: local and regional authorities dealing with disasters”, local and regional elected representatives, parliamentarians and representatives of . The date of 26 April 2006 marked the 20th anniversary governments, international and non-governmental of the unprecedented catastrophe in the history of mankind organisations and experts, which took place at the Chernobyl nuclear power station. Meeting in Slavutych on the 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster, 2. The consequences of the Chernobyl disaster have long been a subject of speculation and the issue is a no less Resolve to adopt an appeal, which will be forwarded to the topical subject today, which is why the Congress decided to Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council hold a conference on “Chernobyl, 20 years on: local and of Europe and to other interested organisations. regional authorities dealing with disasters” in Slavutych in Ukraine, from 2 to 4 March 2006. Here in Slavutych, some 50 kilometres from Chernobyl and twenty years after the worst technological disaster in the history of humankind, we feel the need to solemnly 3.
    [Show full text]