DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of Sorghum and Millet Production Systems in Mali and Burkina Faso

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Development of Sorghum and Millet Production Systems in Mali and Burkina Faso Supported by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Photo on front cover: Farmer and AMEDD NGO Agent with Grinkan, Summer 2008 Development of Sorghum & Millet Production Systems in Mali and Burkina Faso John H. Sanders, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN [email protected] Botorou Ouendeba, 3N Program, Government of Niger, Niamey, Niger [email protected] Ababacar Ndoye, retired, Formerly Director of ITA, Dakar, Senegal [email protected] Soungalo Traore, retired. Formerly Head of Research, National Extension Service, Mopti region, Mali [email protected] Niaba Teme, Crop Breeder, Senior Scientist, IER-Institute of the Rural Economy, National Agricultural Research Institution, Bamako, Mali [email protected] This report was financed by the Gates Foundation with earlier work upon which it is based, financed by INTSORMIL, USAID, and the McKnight Foundation We especially appreciate the support of IER, INERA and the regional office of the national extension service for the Mopti region. Content pages: Recommendations for Moving from the Experiment 1 to 9 Station to the Farm with New Technology and Marketing Strategies I. New Technology-Marketing Systems, Pages 11- 90 Introduction of a New Sorghum Technology into Mali 12 to 33 Sorghum Production Systems in Burkina Faso 34 to 46 Introducing New Millet Production Systems in Mali 47 to 76 The Mopti Field Program, 2015-2016 Crop Year 77 to 90 II. Secondary Markets, Pages 91 - 138 Demand for Processed Millet Products in Mali & Burkina Faso 92 to 112 Feed Grains as a Secondary Market for Sorghum in Mali &Burkina Faso 113 to 138 Acknowledgements: We are grateful to the many scientists who made available their personnel and oriented us and to the specialists who identified and interviewed farmers, chicken producers, vets, and millet food processors for us. Farmers and the entrepreneurs were also especially gracious and patient with us and our detailed questions. Clearly without them it would have been impossible to accomplish this work. Below we specifically identify those most involved but we are also grateful to the many people interviewed and those who participated in the four workshops. Dr. Boureima DEMBELE, Directeur General de l’IER - Mali; Dr. Ibrahima NDIAYE, Directeur Scientifique de l’IER - Mali ; Mr. Oumar MAIGA, Directeur Regional, DRA-Mopti, Mali. Dr. Abou BERTHE , Directeur, Sasakawa 2000, Mali. Mr. Oumar SANDINAN, du Sasakawa 2000, Mali Dr. Mamourou DIOURTE, Chef du Programme Sorgho de l’IER - Mali ; Mr. Mamadou SOUFOUNTERA du Laboratoire de Technologie Alimentaire de l’IER – Mali ; Ms. Salimata COULIBALY du Laboratoire de Technologie Alimentaire de l’IER – Mali ; Mr. Soungalo TRAORE, Direction Regionale de Mopti Mr. Ibrahima KONATE, Gérant AIID-Conseil - Coordinateur programme de développement des chaines de valeur mil et sorgho – Koutiala - Mali ; Mr. Gaoussou DIAWARA, Coordinateur de l'ONG Centre d'Appui à l'Autopromotion pour le Développement (ONG-CAAD/KOUTIALA-MALI) Mr. Mamadou KEBE, Chef secteur Agriculture de Koro Mr. Issa DAOU, Chef sous secteur Agriculture Bankass. Dr. Hamidou TRAORE, Directeur General de l’INERA – Burkina Faso ; Dr. Bréhima DIAWARA, Directeur du Département de Technologie Alimentaire (DTA/INERA)- Burkina Faso ; Dr. Laurencia OUATTARA/SONGRE du Département de Technologie Alimentaire (DTA/INERA)- Burkina Faso ; Mr. Michel COMBARI du Département de Technologie Alimentaire (DTA/INERA)- Burkina Faso ; Dr. Fabrice BATIONO du Département de Technologie Alimentaire (DTA/INERA)- Burkina Faso ; Mr. Pierre Paul SANON Ingénieur d’élevage Burkina Faso ; Ms. Gisele Kazoni, ONG Afrque Verte, Burkina Faso. Dr. Donald LARSON, retired Professor, Ohio State All the members of the farmers’ organizations and entepreneurs and other scientists that we interviewed. Recommendations for Moving from the Experiment Station to the Farm with New Technology and Marketing Strategies John H. Sanders, Botorou Ouendeba, and Ababacar Ndoye Introduction From 2004-2013 we implemented a pilot program of new technology and marketing strategy introduction in up to four Sahelian counties. We also coordinated with a USAID supported project to scale up our production-marketing system in Mali from 2010 to 2013.This project (IICEM) incorporated the banking sector for fertilizer loans for the farmers’ associations and facilitated contracts between the farmers’ associations and wholesalers to buy the sorghum and millet. From September 2014 to March 1, 2016 the Gates Foundation sponsored us in reviewing the progress and performance of these programs and requested us to evaluate the potential of the secondary markets for millet and sorghum to develop and thereby reduce a price decline from successful technology introduction or favorable weather conditions. Here we consider our five recommendations from this work, three for new technology- marketing system introduction and two for accelerating the growth of the secondary markets: A. Introducing New Sorghum and Millet Technologies and Marketing Strategies 1. Identify and Support Research-Extension on Second Generation Problems; 2. Insure Access to Higher Analysis Inorganic Fertilizer and Regularly Renew the Seed; 3. Strengthen Farmers’ Associations for Sorghum and Millet as Marketing Cooperatives. B. Accelerate the Growth of the Secondary, Domestic Markets for Sorghum and Millet 4. Reduce Costs in Millet Processing to Expand Sales to Middle and Lower Income Consumers; 5. Substitute Sorghum for Maize in the Feed with Increasing Sorghum Yields. Second Generation Problems Many developing countries1 have succeeded in training agricultural scientists and in implementing good agricultural research in national experiment stations. The primary question here is why there have not been more successes with the two basic food crops in these Sahelian countries, sorghum and millet. We propose another explanation besides the traditional ones. Our 1 We have worked in the Sahelian countries of Mali and Burkina Faso for this contract and previously in Niger and Senegal. So the discussion here draws principally upon our recent work in the first two but also includes some consideration of the second two. 1 explanation is the difficulty (lack of available funds) of either national research or extension agencies to respond to second generation problems. There is a litany of reasons given to explain why farmers and donors are not interested in sorghum and millet: these crops do not respond to fertilizer; fertilizer use is not profitable for them; farmers are too risk averse to spend money on these inputs; increasing productivity would lead to price collapses due to lack of secondary markets. To summarize. New sorghum and millet cultivars respond to fertilizer and are profitable when implemented along with improved marketing (Coulibaly et. al., 2015, pp. 55, 57; Sanders, J.H., B. Ouendeba, A. Ndoye, S. Traore, N. Teme [This bulletin], 2016, references, pp. 27, 28). Farmers are willing to take risks and the increased incentive for more effective fertilizer use is the availability and promotion of higher analysis fertilizers. Besides the higher analysis fertilizer recommendation seed renewal with certified seed was given little attention in the scaling up process. So these two production factors are important but the basic problem is an institutional factor involved in the financing of research and extension. The narrow definition of Second Generation Problems is the response of the biological system to the changes incurred with the introduction of new technologies. When the new shorter season dwarf rice was introduced by IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) in the sixties, there was an increase in the number of rice crops per year thereby substantially increasing insect problems. So research on insect resistance and chemical control was undertaken by this international center. Agriculture is a continually changing biological system so new problems are going to arise over time. If the technology is then rejected when these problems occur, the discovery and extension systems have to start over. Moreover, a broader definition of Second Generation problems would include the elements that the breeder (or other technology developer) did not realize were important. For example, with Grinkan, a high yielding sorghum with several other desirable properties, the softness of the variety meant that following traditional processing methods gave a “to”, the basic food commodity in rural areas, that people did not like. In food science terms this is the consistency problem. As a result women refused to buy Grinkan in the village markets. This information was communicated up to regional and national markets. So the markets collapsed for a cultivar offering 50 to 100% yield increases with moderate fertilization over local cultivars (This bulletin, 2016, PP. 19-22, 36-38). Breeders or other technology developers cannot be expected to anticipate all potential problems. So responding to problems identified over time especially with an initially successful technology needs to be an important activity for the research and extension services. So why does not this processing problem become a research and/or extension issue? The main problem with national research and extension agencies is that most of their funding is needed for personnel making them dependent upon outside sources for the operating budget. So developing country management, individual scientist, and
Recommended publications
  • Small Millets in Global Agriculture

    Small Millets in Global Agriculture

    SMALL MILLETS IN GLOBAL AGRICULTURE Proceedings of the First International Small Millets Workshop Bangalore, India, October 29-November 2, 1986 Editors: A. Seetharam K. W. Riley G. Harinarayana 41- OXFORD & IBH PUBLISHING CO. PVT. LTD. New Delhi Bombay Calcutta © 1989 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE ISBN 81-204-0434-3 Published in India by Mohan Primlani for Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., 66 Janpath, New Delhi 110 001, typeset by Composers and printed at Pauls Press, Okhla Industrial Area, New Delhi 110 020. 1-S9-11 L CONTENTS Editor's Preface vii Inaugural Address : M. V. Rao ix Workshop Participants and Authors I : OVERVIEW AND TAXONOMY 1. Small Millets-A Selective Overview 3 Hugh Doggett 2. Origin, Evolution and Systematics of Minor Cereals 19 J.M.J. de Wet 11 : IMPORTANCE, GERMPLASM AND VARIETAL IMPROVEMENT IN ASIA 3. Small Millets in Indian Agriculture 33 T. V. Sampath, S.M. Razvi, D. N. Singh and K. V. Bondale 4. Genetic Resources of Small Millets in India 45 A. Seetharam 5. Breeding and Varietal Improvement of Small Millets in India 59 G. Harinarayana 6. Importance, Genetic Resources and Breeding of Small 71 Millets in Bangladesh M.A. Majid, M.A. Hamid and Mannujan 7. Importance, Genetic Resources and Breeding of Small 77 Millets in Sri Lanka S. Ponnuthurai 8. Importance, Genetic Resources and Varietal Improvement 85 of Finger Millet in Nepal Kishor Sherchan 9. Importance and Genetic Resources of Small Millets with 93 Emphasis on Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) in China Chen Jiaju iv 10. Breeding and Varietal Improvement of Foxtail Millet in 101 China Chen Jiaju 11.
  • Climate Risk Profile: Burkina Faso*

    Climate Risk Profile: Burkina Faso*

    Climate Risk Profile: Burkina Faso* Summary This profile provides an overview of projected climate Agro-ecological zones might shift, affecting ecosystems, parameters and related impacts on different sectors biodiversity and crop production. Models project a decrease in Burkina Faso until 2080 under different climate in species richness and an increase in tree cover in response change scenarios (called Representative Concentration to climate change for most areas of Burkina Faso. Pathways, RCPs). RCP2.6 represents the low emissions scenario in line with the Paris Agreement; RCP6.0 represents a medium to high emissions scenario. Model projections do not account for effects of future socioeconomic impacts. Agriculture, biodiversity, health, infrastructure Per capita water availability will decline by 2080 mostly due and water are highly vulnerable to climate change. to population growth. Model projections indicate that water The need for adaptation in these sectors should saving measures will become particularly important after be represented in the German development 2050 in the central and western part of Burkina Faso. cooperation portfolio in Burkina Faso. Depending on the scenario, temperature in Burkina The population affected by at least one heatwave per year Faso is projected to rise by between 1.9 and 4.2 °C is projected to rise from 1.7 % in 2000 to 10 % in 2080. This by 2080, compared to pre-industrial levels, with is related to 88 more very hot days per year over this period. higher temperatures and more temperature extremes As a consequence, heat-related mortality is estimated to projected for the south-western part of the country. increase by a factor of five by 2080.
  • The Story of Millets

    The Story of Millets

    The Story of Millets Millets were the first crops Millets are the future crops Published by: Karnataka State Department of Agriculture, Bengaluru, India with ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Hyderabad, India This document is for educational and awareness purpose only and not for profit or business publicity purposes 2018 Compiled and edited by: B Venkatesh Bhat, B Dayakar Rao and Vilas A Tonapi ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research, Hyderabad Inputs from: Prabhakar, B.Boraiah and Prabhu C. Ganiger (All Indian Coordinated Research Project on Small Millets, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India) Disclaimer The document is a compilation of information from reputed and some popular sources for educational purposes only. The authors do not claim ownership or credit for any content which may be a part of copyrighted material or otherwise. In many cases the sources of content have not been quoted for the sake of lucid reading for educational purposes, but that does not imply authors have claim to the same. Sources of illustrations and photographs have been cited where available and authors do not claim credit for any of the copy righted or third party material. G. Sathish, IFS, Commissioner for Agriculture, Department of Agriculture Government of Karnataka Foreword Millets are the ancient crops of the mankind and are important for rainfed agriculture. They are nutritionally rich and provide number of health benefits to the consumers. With Karnataka being a leading state in millets production and promotion, the government is keen on supporting the farmers and consumers to realize the full potential of these crops. On the occasion of International Organics and Millets Fair, 2018, we are planning before you a story on millets to provide a complete historic global perspective of journey of millets, their health benefits, utilization, current status and future prospects, in association with our knowledge partner ICAR - Indian Institute of Millets Research, with specific inputs from the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru.
  • FINAL REPORT Quantitative Instrument to Measure Commune

    FINAL REPORT Quantitative Instrument to Measure Commune

    FINAL REPORT Quantitative Instrument to Measure Commune Effectiveness Prepared for United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Mali Mission, Democracy and Governance (DG) Team Prepared by Dr. Lynette Wood, Team Leader Leslie Fox, Senior Democracy and Governance Specialist ARD, Inc. 159 Bank Street, Third Floor Burlington, VT 05401 USA Telephone: (802) 658-3890 FAX: (802) 658-4247 in cooperation with Bakary Doumbia, Survey and Data Management Specialist InfoStat, Bamako, Mali under the USAID Broadening Access and Strengthening Input Market Systems (BASIS) indefinite quantity contract November 2000 Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................... i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................... ii 1 INDICATORS OF AN EFFECTIVE COMMUNE............................................... 1 1.1 THE DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE..............................................1 1.2 THE EFFECTIVE COMMUNE: A DEVELOPMENT HYPOTHESIS..........................................2 1.2.1 The Development Problem: The Sound of One Hand Clapping ............................ 3 1.3 THE STRATEGIC GOAL – THE COMMUNE AS AN EFFECTIVE ARENA OF DEMOCRATIC LOCAL GOVERNANCE ............................................................................4 1.3.1 The Logic Underlying the Strategic Goal........................................................... 4 1.3.2 Illustrative Indicators: Measuring Performance at the
  • Inventaire Des Aménagements Hydro-Agricoles Existants Et Du Potentiel Amenageable Au Pays Dogon

    Inventaire Des Aménagements Hydro-Agricoles Existants Et Du Potentiel Amenageable Au Pays Dogon

    INVENTAIRE DES AMÉNAGEMENTS HYDRO-AGRICOLES EXISTANTS ET DU POTENTIEL AMENAGEABLE AU PAYS DOGON Rapport de mission et capitalisation d’expérienCe Financement : Projet d’Appui de l’Irrigation de Proximité (PAIP) Réalisation : cellule SIG DNGR/PASSIP avec la DRGR et les SLGR de la région de Mopti Bamako, avril 2015 Table des matières I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Méthodologie appliquée ................................................................................................................ 3 III. Inventaire des AHA existants et du potentiel aménageable dans le cercle de Bandiagara .......... 4 1. Déroulement des activités dans le cercle de Bandiagara ................................................................................... 7 2. Bilan de l’inventaire du cercle de Bandiagara .................................................................................................... 9 IV. Inventaire des AHA existants et du potentiel aménageable dans les cercles de Bankass et Koro 9 1. Déroulement des activités dans les deux cercles ............................................................................................... 9 2. Bilan de l’inventaire pour le cercle de Koro et Bankass ................................................................................... 11 Gelöscht: 10 V. Inventaire des AHA existants et du potentiel aménageable dans le cercle de Douentza ............. 12 VI. Récapitulatif de l’inventaire
  • M700kv1905mlia1l-Mliadm22305

    M700kv1905mlia1l-Mliadm22305

    ! ! ! ! ! RÉGION DE MOPTI - MALI ! Map No: MLIADM22305 ! ! 5°0'W 4°0'W ! ! 3°0'W 2°0'W 1°0'W Kondi ! 7 Kirchamba L a c F a t i Diré ! ! Tienkour M O P T I ! Lac Oro Haib Tonka ! ! Tombouctou Tindirma ! ! Saréyamou ! ! Daka T O M B O U C T O U Adiora Sonima L ! M A U R I T A N I E ! a Salakoira Kidal c Banikane N N ' T ' 0 a Kidal 0 ° g P ° 6 6 a 1 1 d j i ! Tombouctou 7 P Mony Gao Gao Niafunké ! P ! ! Gologo ! Boli ! Soumpi Koulikouro ! Bambara-Maoude Kayes ! Saraferé P Gossi ! ! ! ! Kayes Diou Ségou ! Koumaïra Bouramagan Kel Zangoye P d a Koulikoro Segou Ta n P c ! Dianka-Daga a ! Rouna ^ ! L ! Dianké Douguel ! Bamako ! ougoundo Leré ! Lac A ! Biro Sikasso Kormou ! Goue ! Sikasso P ! N'Gorkou N'Gouma ! ! ! Horewendou Bia !Sah ! Inadiatafane Koundjoum Simassi ! ! Zoumoultane-N'Gouma ! ! Baraou Kel Tadack M'Bentie ! Kora ! Tiel-Baro ! N'Daba ! ! Ambiri-Habe Bouta ! ! Djo!ndo ! Aoure Faou D O U E N T Z A ! ! ! ! Hanguirde ! Gathi-Loumo ! Oualo Kersani ! Tambeni ! Deri Yogoro ! Handane ! Modioko Dari ! Herao ! Korientzé ! Kanfa Beria G A O Fraction Sormon Youwarou ! Ourou! hama ! ! ! ! ! Guidio-Saré Tiecourare ! Tondibango Kadigui ! Bore-Maures ! Tanal ! Diona Boumbanke Y O U W A R O U ! ! ! ! Kiri Bilanto ! ! Nampala ! Banguita ! bo Sendegué Degue -Dé Hombori Seydou Daka ! o Gamni! d ! la Fraction Sanango a Kikara Na! ki ! ! Ga!na W ! ! Kelma c Go!ui a Te!ye Kadi!oure L ! Kerengo Diambara-Mouda ! Gorol-N! okara Bangou ! ! ! Dogo Gnimignama Sare Kouye ! Gafiti ! ! ! Boré Bossosso ! Ouro-Mamou ! Koby Tioguel ! Kobou Kamarama Da!llah Pringa!
  • Whole and Enriched Grains CACFP Reference Sheet

    Whole and Enriched Grains CACFP Reference Sheet

    OSPI CNS Child and Adult Care Food Program Reference Sheet Whole and Enriched Grains Whole and enriched grains are a part of identifying Whole Grain-Rich (WGR) items. There are several methods to identify WGR items. Please view the Grain Requirements in the CACFP Reference Sheet for more information. Whole Grains: Amaranth Sprouted einkorn Amaranth flour Sprouted spelt Brown rice Sprouted whole rye Buckwheat Sprouted whole wheat Buckwheat flour Steel cut oats Buckwheat groats Teff Bulgur Teff flour Cracked wheat Triticale Graham flour Triticale flour Instant oatmeal Wheat berries Millet Wheat groats Millet flour Whole durum flour Oat groats Whole einkorn berries Old fashioned oats Whole grain corn Quick cooking oats Whole grain corn flour Quinoa Whole grain einkorn flour Rye groats Whole grain oat flour Sorghum Whole grain spelt flour Sorghum flour Whole grain wheat flakes Spelt berries Whole rye flour Sprouted brown rice Whole wheat flour Sprouted buckwheat Wild rice Whole corn Brans and Germs: Corn bran Rye bran Oat bran Wheat bran Rice bran Wheat germ Enriched Grains: Enriched bromated flour Enriched rice Enriched corn flour Enriched rice flour Enriched durum flour Enriched rye flour Enriched durum wheat Enriched wheat flour flour Enriched white flour OSPI CNS November 2018 OSPI CNS Child and Adult Care Food Program Reference Sheet Disregarded Ingredients – May be ignored (typically presented in small amounts) Corn dextrin Tapioca starch Corn starch Wheat dextrin Modified
  • Processing, Nutritional Composition and Health Benefits of Finger Millet

    Processing, Nutritional Composition and Health Benefits of Finger Millet

    a OSSN 0101-2061 (Print) Food Science and Technology OSSN 1678-457X (Dnline) DDO: https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.25017 Processing, nutritional composition and health benefits of finger millet in sub-saharan Africa Shonisani Eugenia RAMASHOA1*, Tonna Ashim ANYASO1, Eastonce Tend GWATA2, Stephen MEDDDWS-TAYLDR3, Afam Osrael Dbiefuna JODEANO1 Abstract Finger millet (Eleusine coracana) also known as tamba, is a staple cereal grain in some parts of the world with low income population. The grain is characterized by variations in colour (brown, white and light brown cultivars); high concentration of carbohydrates, dietary fibre, phytochemicals and essential amino acids; presence of essential minerals; as well as a gluten-free status. Finger millet (FM) in terms of nutritional composition, ranks higher than other cereal grains, though the grain is extremely neglected and widely underutilized. Nutritional configuration of FM contributes to reduced risk of diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure and gastro-intestinal tract disorder when absorbed in the body. Utilization of the grain therefore involves traditional and other processing methods such as soaking, malting, cooking, fermentation, popping and radiation. These processes are utilised to improve the dietetic and sensory properties of FM and equally assist in the reduction of anti-nutritional and inhibitory activities of phenols, phytic acids and tannins. However, with little research and innovation on FM as compared to conventional cereals, there is the need for further studies on processing methods, nutritional composition, health benefits and valorization with a view to commercialization of FM grains. Keywords: finger millet; nutritional composition; gluten-free; antioxidant properties; traditional processing; value-added products. Practical Application: Effects of processing on nutritional composition, health benefits and valorization of finger millet grains.
  • Annuaire Statistique 2015 Du Secteur Développement Rural

    Annuaire Statistique 2015 Du Secteur Développement Rural

    MINISTERE DE L’AGRICULTURE REPUBLIQUE DU MALI ----------------- Un Peuple - Un But – Une Foi SECRETARIAT GENERAL ----------------- ----------------- CELLULE DE PLANIFICATION ET DE STATISTIQUE / SECTEUR DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL Annuaire Statistique 2015 du Secteur Développement Rural Juin 2016 1 LISTE DES TABLEAUX Tableau 1 : Répartition de la population par région selon le genre en 2015 ............................................................ 10 Tableau 2 : Population agricole par région selon le genre en 2015 ........................................................................ 10 Tableau 3 : Répartition de la Population agricole selon la situation de résidence par région en 2015 .............. 10 Tableau 4 : Répartition de la population agricole par tranche d'âge et par sexe en 2015 ................................. 11 Tableau 5 : Répartition de la population agricole par tranche d'âge et par Région en 2015 ...................................... 11 Tableau 6 : Population agricole par tranche d'âge et selon la situation de résidence en 2015 ............. 12 Tableau 7 : Pluviométrie décadaire enregistrée par station et par mois en 2015 ..................................................... 15 Tableau 8 : Pluviométrie décadaire enregistrée par station et par mois en 2015 (suite) ................................... 16 Tableau 9 : Pluviométrie enregistrée par mois 2015 ........................................................................................ 17 Tableau 10 : Pluviométrie enregistrée par station en 2015 et sa comparaison à
  • RAPPORT NATIONAL SUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT HUMAIN, Edition 2016

    RAPPORT NATIONAL SUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT HUMAIN, Edition 2016

    REPUBLIQUE DU MALI Un Peuple – Un But – Une Foi Ministère de la Solidarité, de l'Action Humanitaire Programme des Nations et de la Reconstruction du Nord Unies pour le Développement ------------ Secrétariat Général ------------ Observatoire du Développement Humain Durable et de la Lutte Contre la Pauvreté RAPPORT NATIONAL SUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT HUMAIN, Edition 2016 Mai 2016 EQUIPE D’ELABORATION RNDH, EDITION 2016 Supervision Générale Hamadou KONATE Ministre, de la Solidarité de l’Action Humanitaire et de la Reconstruction du Nord Boubou Dramane CAMARA Directeur Pays du PNUD Mali Coordination Technique Samba Alhamdou BABY Secrétaire Général MSAHRN Mohamed Oualy DIAGOURAGA Conseiller Technique MSAHRN Zoumana B. FOFANA Directeur Général ODHD Bécaye DIARRA Economiste Principal du PNUD Alassane BA Economiste national du PNUD Equipe ODHD/LCP Personnel technique Zoumana B. FOFANA Directeur Général Diakaridja KAMATE Expert Économiste Bouréma F. BALLO Expert Statisticien Mody SIMPARA Statisticien Seydou MAGASSA Sociologue Sogona Binta Fadd DIABY Socio-anthropologue Ely DIARRA Économiste- Informaticien Abdoulaye dit Noël CISSOKO Chargé de Communication Ismaila COULIBALY Documentaliste Administration et Gestion Youssouf DIARRA Agent Comptable Sabane Mahamane MAIGA Comptable Matière Adjoint Adama M. DIAKITE Appui à la Comptabilité Matière Madame Niaré Hawa KAREMBÉ Assistante d’équipe Madame Diallo Aminata TRAORE Secrétaire Equipe PNUD Bécaye DIARRA Economiste Principal du PNUD, Unité économique Alassane BA Economiste national du PNUD, Unité économique Comité Scientifique élargi Président Mohamed Oualy DIAGOURAGA MSAHRN Membres Zoumana B. FOFANA ODHD Adama BARRY CT CSLP AbdoulayeDIAKITE DNDS Pr Cheick Hamallah BARADJI CRNST Mme Zeinabou DRAME IER Issa SACKO USSG Aboubacar S. SACKO DNPD Ibrahima KAMPO CESC El Hadj Oumarou Malam SOULE AFRISTAT Ishaga COULIBALY DNP Benjamin SIVASIMA UNICEF Mme Ramatou DIARRA DGB Boubacar MACALOU CERCAP Pr Naffet KEITA ULSHB Dr Mamadou Fadiala SISSOKO INSRP Arsène R.
  • Resultats Provisoires Licence 2 Sem 4

    Resultats Provisoires Licence 2 Sem 4

    L2 Histoire S4 NOTES DU MODULE POUVOIR ETAT SOCIETE (CM) Moyenne N° D'ORDRE N° ETUDIANT N° MTLE Noms Prénoms Date de naissance de Lieu naissance Sexe Ghana Mali Segou Etats de Samori 1 FHG141519275114D1M09888W ABDALLAH Mahamadou 00-00-1993 Ouatagouna M 5 11 15.5 11 10.63 2 FHG141519525514M1M12392Z ALASSANE Alher Ag 31-05-1994 Koutiala M 7 10 4 11.5 8.13 3 FHG141518601214G1M03149N ALASSANE Aliou 29-09-1996 Gao M 14 7 8.5 13 10.63 4 FHG141518601414G1M03151M ALASSANE Almihidi 30-10-1995 Gao M 5 2 10.5 12 7.38 5 FHG141519168014F1M08817P ALASSANE Mahamane 13-04-1995 Tombouctou M 6.5 12 8 12 9.63 6 FHG141519525614M1M12393A ALASSANE N'Gari 31-12-1994 Saréyamou M 8 14 9.5 11.5 10.75 7 FHG141518922814R1M06365B ALI Ousmane 06-03-1996 Gao M 10 7 13 12.5 10.63 8 FHG141518602414G1M03161T ALMATAR Youssouf 00-00-1993 Ménaka M 10 5 10.5 10.5 9.00 9 FHG141519448814C1M11625V BAGAYOKO Bréhima 10-06-1994 Yantioribougou M 10 10 10.5 2 8.13 10 FHG141519277214D1M09909D BORE Mahamane 00-00-1995 Drambani M 11 11 10.5 7.5 10.00 11 FHG141519205514P1M09192Y BORONI Inoussa 20-06-93 Yomtao M 12 15 11 12.5 12.63 12 FHG131418015213D1M12799G BOUARE Nouhoum 07-04-1992 Thien-Bamanan M 5 12 6 7.5 7.63 13 FHG141518700814B1M04145H CAMARA Amadou 30-05-1996 Kolokani M 7 14 10 13.5 11.13 14 FHG121316638612R1M07814R CAMARA Kono 00-00-1994 Séléfougou M 6 5 5 8 6.00 15 FHG141518515114J1M02288Q CAMARA Modibo 13-04-1992 Golo/Kati M 6 11 11 9 9.25 16 FHG141519138914F1M08526K CISSE Alhousseiny Albackaye00-00-1995 Tombouctou M 10.5 14 10 12 11.63 17 FHG141519383614C1M10973S CISSE Bréhima
  • Taoudeni Basin Report

    Taoudeni Basin Report

    Integrated and Sustainable Management of Shared Aquifer Systems and Basins of the Sahel Region RAF/7/011 TAOUDENI BASIN 2017 INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED AQUIFER SYSTEMS AND BASINS OF THE SAHEL REGION EDITORIAL NOTE This is not an official publication of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The content has not undergone an official review by the IAEA. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the IAEA or its Member States. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the IAEA as to the legal status of such countries or territories, or their authorities and institutions, or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED AQUIFER SYSTEMS AND BASINS OF THE SAHEL REGION REPORT OF THE IAEA-SUPPORTED REGIONAL TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECT RAF/7/011 TAOUDENI BASIN COUNTERPARTS: Mr Adnane Souffi MOULLA (Algeria) Mr Abdelwaheb SMATI (Algeria) Ms Ratoussian Aline KABORE KOMI (Burkina Faso) Mr Alphonse GALBANE (Burkina Faso) Mr Sidi KONE (Mali) Mr Aly THIAM (Mali) Mr Brahim Labatt HMEYADE (Mauritania) Mr Sidi Haiba BACAR (Mauritania) EXPERT: Mr Jean Denis TAUPIN (France) Reproduced by the IAEA Vienna, Austria, 2017 INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED AQUIFER SYSTEMS AND BASINS OF THE SAHEL REGION INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED AQUIFER SYSTEMS AND BASINS OF THE SAHEL REGION Table of Contents 1.