Rapid Review Book
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lineal Kinship Organization in Cross-Specific Perspective
Lineal kinship organization in cross-specific perspective Laura Fortunato Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology University of Oxford 64 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6PN, UK [email protected] +44 (0)1865 284971 Santa Fe Institute 1399 Hyde Park Road Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA Published as: Fortunato, L. (2019). Lineal kinship organization in cross-specific perspective. Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1780):20190005. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0005, The article is part of the theme issue \The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals". http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb/374/1780. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Kinship vs. descent 5 3 Lineal kinship in cross-specific perspective 8 4 Lineal kinship in cross-cultural perspective 12 4.1 A cross-cultural example: the association between descent and residence . 13 4.2 Reframing lineal kinship organization as lineal biases in kin investment . 19 5 Conclusion 21 References 23 2 Abstract I draw on insights from anthropology to outline a framework for the study of kinship systems that applies across animal species with biparental sexual reproduction. In particular, I define lineal kinship organization as a social system that emphasizes interactions among lineally related kin | that is, individuals related through females only, if the emphasis is towards matrilineal kin, and individuals related through males only, if the emphasis is towards patrilineal kin. In a given population, the emphasis may be expressed in one or more social domains, corresponding to pathways for the transmission of different resources across generations (e.g. -
Retained Neonatal Reflexes | the Chiropractic Office of Dr
Retained Neonatal Reflexes | The Chiropractic Office of Dr. Bob Apol 12/24/16, 1:56 PM Temper tantrums Hypersensitive to touch, sound, change in visual field Moro Reflex The Moro Reflex is present at 9-12 weeks after conception and is normally fully developed at birth. It is the baby’s “danger signal”. The baby is ill-equipped to determine whether a signal is threatening or not, and will undergo instantaneous arousal. This may be due to sudden unexpected occurrences such as change in head position, noise, sudden movement or change of light or even pain or temperature change. This activates the stress response system of “fight or flight”. If the Moro Reflex is present after 6 months of age, the following signs may be present: Reaction to foods Poor regulation of blood sugar Fatigues easily, if adrenalin stores have been depleted Anxiety Mood swings, tense muscles and tone, inability to accept criticism Hyperactivity Low self-esteem and insecurity Juvenile Suck Reflex This is active together with the “Rooting Reflex” which allows the baby to feed and suck. If this reflex is not sufficiently integrated, the baby will continue to thrust their tongue forward, pushing on the upper jaw and causing an overbite. This by nature affects the jaw and bite position. This may affect: Chewing Difficulties with solid foods Dribbling Rooting Reflex Light touch around the mouth and cheek causes the baby’s head to turn to the stimulation, the mouth to open and tongue extended in preparation for feeding. It is present from birth usually to 4 months. -
3 Franklin TS 4-1(M)
Lecture Embryo Watching How IVF Has Remade Biology Sarah Franklin University of Cambridge Abstract In addition to being one of the most iconic of the new reproduc- tive technologies introduced in the late twentieth century, in vitro fertiliza- tion is also a technology of representation – a looking glass into conception, a window onto early human development, and as such a new form of public spectacle. Still a rapidly expanding global biomedical service sector, IVF tech- nology is also the source of new images of human origins, and thus offers a new visual grammar of coming into being. This lecture explores these con- nections, and argues that the micromanipulation imagery associated with IVF, and now a routine feature of news coverage and popular debate of NRTs, al- so introduces a new connection between cells and tools, thus returning us to one of the oldest sociological questions – the question concerning technolo- gy. Moving between IVF as a technology of reproduction, and a visual tech- nology, enables us to revisit a series of broad sociological questions concern- ing technology, reproduction, genealogy and the future of biological control from the unique perspective offered by the conversion of the human embryo into both a tool and a lens. Keywords IVF; micromanipulation; human embryo; biological control; visual culture. Corresponding author Sarah Franklin, Department of Sociology, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RQ, United Kingdom - Email: [email protected] 1. Introduction Although its first human offspring were not born until the1970s, in vitro fertilization is now at least a century old, and is itself the product of many generations of accumulated scientific expertise. -
Intro to Pediatric HCC Module
A Message from Mark Baiada BAYADA Home Health Care has a special purpose—to help people have a safe home life with comfort, independence, and dignity. BAYADA will only succeed with your involvement and commitment as a member of our home health care team. I recognize your importance to the organization and appreciate your compassion, excellence, and reliability. I value the skills, expertise, and experience that you bring with you. And, as an organization, BAYADA is committed to providing you with opportunities to help broaden your expertise and experience. Acquiring new skills will allow you to participate in the care of a wider variety of clients. That makes you an increasingly valuable member of our home health care team. Most importantly, our clients benefit when you successfully master new skills that contribute to their safety and well-being. BAYADA University and the School of Nursing courses are designed to help you perfect your knowledge and skill to achieve clinical excellence in the care of clients. I applaud your willingness to continue the journey of life-long learning and wish you continued success in your professional development as an important member of the BAYADA team. Sincerely, Mark Baiada President Table of Contents Welcome ...........................................................................................................................iv Introduction to home care ................................................................................................. 1 Psychosocial .................................................................................................................. -
Step Usmle® 1
2015 USMLE Review THE 25th EDITION OF THE WORLD’S MOST FOR ® POPULAR MEDICAL REVIEW BOOK! THE FIRST AID FIRST FIRST AID Trust 25 years of experience for the most effective USMLE Step 1 preparation possible ® • 1,250+ must-know topics provide a complete • Extensive faculty review process with Due to Printer: framework for your USMLE preparation nationally known USMLE instructors THIRD PASS 10/31/14 • Test-taking advice with focus on • 1,000+ color photos and diagrams help high-efficiency studying you visualize high-yield concepts THE FOR Sponsoring • Major revisions in all subject areas based • Expanded guide to high-yield study Catherine Johnson USMLE Editor on feedback from thousands of students resources, including mobile apps ® USMLE STEP • Free real-time updates and corrections at www.firstaidteam.com INSIDER ADVICE Marketing Jennifer Orlando FOR STUDENTS FROM STUDENTS STEP FOR THE ULTIMATE STEP 1 FOR A COMPLETE 1 Copy REVIEW PACKAGE, REVIEW OF THE Editor John Gerard BE SURE TO BASIC SCIENCES, ALSO GET: TURN TO: 1 2015 th Editorial 25 Peter Boyle EDITION 25th ANNIVERSARY EDITION Supervisor LE j c More than 1,250 frequently tested topics and mnemonics b BHUSHAN Art Director Anthony Landi Index c Hundreds of significant high-yield updates b c 250+ new photographs and diagrams b 978-0-07-174397-6 978-0-07-174402-7 978-0-07-174395-2 978-0-07-174388-4 j SO c c Updated student ratings of review resources and apps b HAT ISBN 978-0-07-184006-4 MHID 0-07-184006-0 9 0 0 0 0 Visit: FirstAidfortheBoards.com and FirstAidTeam.com 9 7 8 0 0 7 1 8 4 0 0 6 4 “USMLE” is a registered trademark of the National Board of Medical Examiners. -
Pediatric Welcome to Virtue Chiropractic
Virtue Chiropractic New Patient Initial Interview - Pediatric Welcome to Virtue Chiropractic. Your time here today is very important. The information you fill in here is paramount to Dr. Loren reaching conclusions and directional decisions about your child’s health, from the past to the present and into the future. If there is anything you’re not sure of then please don’t hesitate to ask one of our friendly team members. About the Child: Last Name: _________________ First: ____________________ Preferred Name: _________________ Gender: Male Female Date of Birth: ________________ Age: _____________ Number of Siblings: ________ Sibling(s) Names & Ages __________________________________ Social Security Number (for insurance purposes) :____________________________________ About the Parent/Guardian: Name: __________________________________ Birthdate: ___________________ Age: _______ Mailing Address: ________________________________City_______________ Zip Code____________ Occupation_____________________________Employer______________________________________ Email: __________________________________________________________________________________ Spouse’s Name: _______________________________________________________________________ Phone: H: __________________ Cell: ___________________ Cell Phone Provider (for reminders): __________________________ Who can we thank for referring you OR How did you hear about us? ______________________ Reason for the visit: ____ Describe the reason for the visit (Please be specific): _________________________________________________________________________________________________ -
Family, Kinship, and Descent
Introduction to Cultural Anthropology: Class 19 Family, kinship, and descent Copyright Bruce Owen 2011 − So, we have seen that gender identity is socially constructed − that leads us naturally to marriage and sex − which then leads us to descent − descent : rules to identify and categorize ancestors and offspring − which leads us to kinship − kinship : rules to categorize and interact with ancestors, offspring, and other relatives (our kin ) − which in turn plays a big role in creating personal identities and structuring marriages and families − remember that “culture is integrated” and “culture can be understood as a system” − each of these parts (identity, gender, marriage, descent, kinship) is profoundly shaped by the others, and affects the others in turn − you can’t really understand any one in isolation − each only makes full sense in the context of all the rest − Marriage, family, and kinship are… socially constructed − meaning: − many forms are possible − nature does not define how marriages and families are set up − cultures develop any of many possible solutions − so the forms of marriage, families, and how we name and handle relations with other kin are variable from one culture to the next − in our culture, we think of (or construct) marriage as being − a personal choice made by two people − mostly having to do with romantic love, sex, and friendship − this reflects our egocentric concept of personhood in general − many, if not most, societies see marriage very differently − as a relationship established between two groups -
02 Social Cultural Anthropology Module : 16 Kinship: Definition and Approaches
Paper No. : 02 Social Cultural Anthropology Module : 16 Kinship: Definition and Approaches Development Team Principal Investigator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Paper Coordinator Prof. Sabita, Department of Anthropology, Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar Gulsan Khatoon, Department of Anthropology, Utkal Content Writer University, Bhubaneswar Prof. A.K. Sinha, Department of Anthropology, Content Reviewer P anjab University, Chandigarh 1 Social Cultural Anthropology Anthropology Kinship: Definition and Approaches Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name 02 Social Cultural Anthropology Module Name/Title Kinship: Definition and Approaches Module Id 16 2 Social Cultural Anthropology Anthropology Kinship: Definition and Approaches Contents Introduction 1. History of kinship study 2. Meaning and definition 3. Kinship approaches 3.1 Structure of Kinship Roles 3.2 Kinship Terminologies 3.3 Kinship Usages 3.4 Rules of Descent 3.5 Descent Group 4. Uniqueness of kinship in anthropology Anthropological symbols for kin Summary Learning outcomes After studying this module: You shall be able to understand the discovery, history and structure of kinship system You will learn the nature of kinship and the genealogical basis of society You will learn about the different approaches of kinship, kinship terminology, kinship usages, rules of descent, etc You will be able to understand the importance of kinship while conducting fieldwork. The primary objective of this module is: 3 Social Cultural Anthropology Anthropology Kinship: Definition and Approaches To give a basic understanding to the students about Kinship, its history of origin, and subject matter It also attempts to provide an informative background about the different Kinship approaches. 4 Social Cultural Anthropology Anthropology Kinship: Definition and Approaches INTRODUCTION The word “kinship” has been used to mean several things-indeed; the situation is so complex that it is necessary to simplify it in order to study it. -
Kinship Structures and Social Cohesion
Kinship structures and social cohesion PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS Kinship networks in modern society Are they relevant? Contemporary society presents new problems Modern systems considered ‘complex’; ‘open’ not ‘closed’. Yet forms of structural endogamy or cohesion prevail; connections are more than expected in random marriage market Does not form closed social compartments, but open structures Kinship and social networks – anthropological/sociological questions, ideas crucial What is kinship? The field of blood and marriage relationships and those recognized as ‘kinship’ relations Adoptive kinship; step relations; effective kinship; practical kinship; important relations; fictive kinship Preliminary uses of kinship network study Marriage and conjugal ties Group placement and social identity Inheritance and succession Resource distribution Authority and power Migration patterns Support systems (natural crisis, conflict, poverty, dislocation) Genealogies The chain of kinship relations across generations is mapped onto a genealogical grid The grid is a schemata or a skeleton on which can be hung Life histories and group histories Resource histories Studies of succession and inheritance The formation of closed or open systems of affinity and allocation The overlap of kinship and other ties to form strong/weak networks The basic symbols of kinship Descent Patrilineal Descent Trace descent in one line only. Ego belongs to either father’s or mother’s family. Matrilineal Descent Trace descent from male and female ancestors. Children -
Kinship Terminology from a Cultural Perspective: Japanese Versus? Hungarian
日本語とジェンダー 第14号(2014) 【研究例会 IN ハンガリー 発表】 Kinship Terminology from a Cultural Perspective: Japanese versus? Hungarian Judit Hidasi This article is part of a longer study in progress on the relationship of language use and society with regards to kinship terminology. The article first gives some frame to the study by briefly introducing the concept of kinship, next different descent patterns in societies to be followed by categorization patterns of kinship terminology (Morgan) in Hungarian and Japanese. It is assumed that kin terms are valuable clues to the nature of a kinship system in a society as well as to the social statuses and roles of kinsmen, of the roles of men and women. Changes in kinship terminology also reflect to a certain extent changes of a given society. What is kinship? Kinship refers to the culturally defined relationships between individuals who are commonly thought of as having family ties. All societies use kinship as a basis for forming social groups and for classifying people. However, there is a great amount of variability in kinship rules and patterns around the world. In order to understand social interaction, attitudes, and motivations in most societies, it is essential to know how their kinship systems function. In many societies, kinship is the most important social organizing principle along with gender and age. Kinship also provides a means for transmitting status and property from generation to generation. It is not a mere coincidence that inheritance rights usually are based on the closeness of kinship links. Kinship connections are based on two categories of bonds: those created by marriage (affinal relatives: husband, wife, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law) and those that result from descent (consanguinal that is ’blood’ relatives: mother, father, grandparents, children, grandchildren, uncles, aunts and cousins), which is a socially recognized link between ancestors and descendants. -
Kinship and Descent
Marital Residence & Kinship Chapter 10 Forms of Human Kinship Basis of group formations:Gessellschaft Occupation Kinship Social Class Age Ethnic Affiliation Education/ Religion, etc. Forms of Human Kinship- Cont’d Geminshaft- (Small scale, nonindustrial) What is the basis of group membership? Kinship Marital Residence Patterns Patrilocal Residence: …the married couple lives with or near the relatives of the husband’s father, (parents). (67% of all societies). Matrilocal Residence: …the married couple lives with or near the relatives of the wife. (15% of all societies). Residence Patterns: Cont’d Bilocal (Ambilocal) Residence: …the married couple has a choice of living with either the relatives of the wife or the relatives of the husband. (7% of all societies). Residence Patterns: Cont’d Avunculocal Residence: …the son or daughter normally leave, but the son and his wife settle with or near his mother’s brother. …the married couple lives with or near the husband’s mother’s brother. (4% of all societies). Residence Patterns: Cont’d Neolocal Residence: …the married couple forms an independent place or residence away from the relatives of either spouse. (5% of all societies). Kinship Kinship- …refers to relationships that are based on blood and/or marriage. Types: Consanguineal Relatives- Affinal Relatives- Fictive Kinship- Functions of Kinship Vertical Function- …a kinship system provides social continuity by binding together a number of successive generations. Horizontal Function- …solidifies or ties together, across a single generation through the process of marriage. Formation of Descent Groups Descent- …refers to the rules a culture uses to establish affiliations with one’s parents. Descent Group- …any publicly recognized social entity such that being a lineal descendant of a particular real or mythical ancestor is a criterion of membership. -
The Evolution of Female-Biased Kinship in Humans and Other Mammals Royalsocietypublishing.Org/Journal/Rstb Siobha´N M
The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rstb Siobha´n M. Mattison1, Mary K. Shenk2, Melissa Emery Thompson1, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder3 and Laura Fortunato4,5 1Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA Preface 2Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA 3Department of Anthropology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA 4 Cite this article: Mattison SM, Shenk MK, Department of Anthropology, Magdalen College, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 4AU, UK 5Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA Thompson ME, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Fortunato L. 2019 The evolution of female-biased kinship SMM, 0000-0002-9537-5459; MKS, 0000-0003-2002-1469; MET, 0000-0003-2451-6397; MB, 0000-0003-1117-5984;LF,0000-0001-8546-9497 in humans and other mammals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 374: 20190007. Female-biased kinship (FBK) arises in numerous species and in diverse http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0007 human cultures, suggesting deep evolutionary roots to female-oriented social structures. The significance of FBK has been debated for centuries in Accepted: 3 June 2019 human studies, where it has often been described as difficult to explain. At the same time, studies of FBK in non-human animals point to its apparent benefits for longevity, social complexity and reproduction. Are female- One contribution of 17 to a theme issue ‘The biased social systems evolutionarily stable and under what circumstances? evolution of female-biased kinship in humans What are the causes and consequences of FBK? The purpose of this theme and other mammals’.