DOCSLIB.ORG

OCS Study BOEM 2019-052: an Overview of Ecological Research Associated with Oil and Gas Platforms Offshore California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OCS Study BOEM 2019-052: an Overview of Ecological Research Associated with Oil and Gas Platforms Offshore California OCS Study BOEM 2019-052 An Overview of Ecological Research Associated with Oil and Gas Platforms Offshore California US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2019-052 An Overview of Ecological Research Associated with Oil and Gas Platforms Offshore California December 2019 Author: Milton S. Love Prepared under Cooperative Agreement Number M15AC00014 By Marine Science Institute University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106 US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region DISCLAIMER Study collaboration and funding were provided by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, under Cooperative Agreement Number M15AC00014. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US Government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. REPORT AVAILABILITY To download a PDF file of this report, go to the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Data and Information Systems webpage (https://www.boem.gov/Environmental-Studies- EnvData/), click on the link for the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS), and search on 2019-052. CITATION Love MS. 2019. An Overview of Ecological Research Associated with Oil and Gas Platforms Offshore California. Camarillo (CA): US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. OCS Study BOEM 2019-052. 148 p. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) through Cooperative Agreement Number M15AC00014 with the University of California, Santa Barbara. We thank A. Bull, M. Eckenrode, and C. Dunkel for their help in this work’s various phases. Monica Pessino created the annotated bibliography website. Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................................. iii 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 3 3 The Development of California Offshore Oil and Gas ........................................................................... 3 4 A Summary of Previous California Platform Research ......................................................................... 6 4.1 Biology and Ecology of California Platform Organisms ............................................................... 6 4.2 Environmental Effects of Offshore Oil Development.................................................................. 14 4.3 Potential Consequences of Platform Decommissioning ............................................................ 19 5 An Annotated Bibliography of Research Conducted Worldwide on Organisms and Organismal Communities Associated with Oil and Gas Platforms ......................................................................... 25 6 Comparisons with Gulf of Mexico Platform Fish and Invertebrate Assemblages ............................... 26 7 An Issue of the Bulletin of Marine Science Dedicated to California Platform Science ....................... 27 8 References .......................................................................................................................................... 27 Appendix A: A Synopsis of Extant California Oil and Gas Platforms .......................................................... 43 A .......................................................................................................................................................... 43 B .......................................................................................................................................................... 43 C .......................................................................................................................................................... 44 Edith .................................................................................................................................................... 44 Ellen ..................................................................................................................................................... 45 Elly ....................................................................................................................................................... 45 Emmy .................................................................................................................................................. 45 Esther .................................................................................................................................................. 45 Eureka ................................................................................................................................................. 46 Eva ...................................................................................................................................................... 46 Gail ...................................................................................................................................................... 46 Gilda .................................................................................................................................................... 47 Gina ..................................................................................................................................................... 47 Grace ................................................................................................................................................... 47 Habitat ................................................................................................................................................. 48 Harmony .............................................................................................................................................. 48 Harvest ................................................................................................................................................ 49 i Henry ................................................................................................................................................... 49 Heritage ............................................................................................................................................... 49 Hermosa .............................................................................................................................................. 50 Hidalgo ................................................................................................................................................ 50 Hillhouse .............................................................................................................................................. 50 Hogan .................................................................................................................................................. 51 Holly ..................................................................................................................................................... 51 Hondo .................................................................................................................................................. 51 Houchin ............................................................................................................................................... 52 Irene .................................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix B: Citations in the Online Annotated Bibliography ...................................................................... 54 Appendix C: Abstracts from the Bulletin of Marine Science Issue ............................................................ 142 C.1 Fishes and invertebrates of oil and gas platforms off California: an introduction and summary ................................................................................................................................... 142 C.2 An analysis of the fish assemblages around 23 oil and gas platforms off California with comparisons with natural habitats ............................................................................................ 142 C.3 Fishes with high reproductive output potential on California offshore oil and gas platforms ... 143 C.4 Offshore oil production platforms as potential sources of larvae to coastal shelf regions off southern California .............................................................................................................. 143 C.5 Timing of juvenile fish settlement at offshore oil platforms coincides with water mass advection into the Santa Barbara Channel, California ............................................................. 144 C.6 An analysis of the sessile, structure-forming
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5. Consultation and Collaboration
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement Diamond Project Plumas National Forest Chapter 5. Consultation and Collaboration 5.1 Preparers and Contributors_____________________________ The Forest Service consulted the following individuals; federal, state, and local agencies; and tribes during the development of this environmental impact statement (EIS): 5.1.1 Interdisciplinary Team Members Name Title Education / Responsibility / Experience Merri Carol Martens Planner Merri Carol has a B.S. degree in Forestry from West Virginia University. She has 15 years of experience in natural resource management with the U.S. Forest Service. Chris Collins Wildlife Chris holds a B.S. degree in Wildlife Management from Biologist Humboldt State University. He has 13 years of experience in wildlife management and biological work with the U.S. Forest Service, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Chris is responsible for project coordination, planning, implementation, and monitoring for wildlife issues on the Mt. Hough Ranger District. Michelle Coppoletta Botanist Michelle received a B.S. degree in Plant Biology from the University of California at Berkeley and a Master of Science in Ecology from the University of California at Davis. Prior to working with the Forest Service, Michelle was a rare plant botanist for the National Park Service at Point Reyes National Seashore where she worked on developing conservation and management plans for rare and sensitive plant species. She has also worked as a biological science technician for the USGS in the southern Sierra Nevada. She is currently the assistant botanist on the Mt. Hough Ranger District of the Plumas National Forest. Cristina Weinberg Archaeologist Christina has a B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing the Range: Managing Wildlife Impacts to Livestock Production in California Coast Range Working Landscapes Author Sheri Spiegal Ph.D
    Title Sharing the range: managing wildlife impacts to livestock production in California Coast Range working landscapes Author Sheri Spiegal Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley Abstract Livestock and wildlife share grazed rangelands, and in many cases, they get along fine. Some wildlife species, however, can negatively impact livestock operations by killing livestock, consuming forage, damaging facilities, and transmitting disease. Ranchers have traditionally resorted to lethal wildlife control to reduce these impacts, yet this has been controversial as many people do not want any animal to be harmed for any reason. In addition, some policies designed to protect wildlife may be perceived by ranchers as doing so at the expense of livestock production. It is important to find ways to minimize the conflicts between livestock production and wildlife protection in order to maintain sustainable working landscapes that enjoy broad support among livestock producers and conservationists. Interviews of people connected with livestock production in and adjacent to the California Coast Ranges, from Mendocino County south to Monterey County, and a review of scientific literature were used to identify the main problems ranchers experience with wildlife and the impact reduction strategies they use that are broadly acceptable to the public. Interviewees most commonly described grievances related to the mountain lion, tule elk, coyote, California ground squirrel, and feral pig. For each of these species, a history of popular opinion in California is summarized, ecological and biological characteristics are briefly reviewed, impacts to livestock operations are described, dimensions of lethal control are outlined, and strategies used to reduce impacts with minimal controversy are assessed for their effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Life-Cycle Analysis of Pacific Ocean Zooplankton by Video Microscopy and DNA Barcoding: Crustacea
    Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Research Article Open Access Diversity and life-cycle analysis of Pacific Ocean zooplankton by video microscopy and DNA barcoding: Crustacea Abstract Volume 10 Issue 3 - 2021 Determining the DNA sequencing of a small element in the mitochondrial DNA (DNA Peter Bryant,1 Timothy Arehart2 barcoding) makes it possible to easily identify individuals of different larval stages of 1Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of marine crustaceans without the need for laboratory rearing. It can also be used to construct California, USA taxonomic trees, although it is not yet clear to what extent this barcode-based taxonomy 2Crystal Cove Conservancy, Newport Coast, CA, USA reflects more traditional morphological or molecular taxonomy. Collections of zooplankton were made using conventional plankton nets in Newport Bay and the Pacific Ocean near Correspondence: Peter Bryant, Department of Newport Beach, California (Lat. 33.628342, Long. -117.927933) between May 2013 and Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, USA, January 2020, and individual crustacean specimens were documented by video microscopy. Email Adult crustaceans were collected from solid substrates in the same areas. Specimens were preserved in ethanol and sent to the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding at the Received: June 03, 2021 | Published: July 26, 2021 University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada for sequencing of the COI DNA barcode. From 1042 specimens, 544 COI sequences were obtained falling into 199 Barcode Identification Numbers (BINs), of which 76 correspond to recognized species. For 15 species of decapods (Loxorhynchus grandis, Pelia tumida, Pugettia dalli, Metacarcinus anthonyi, Metacarcinus gracilis, Pachygrapsus crassipes, Pleuroncodes planipes, Lophopanopeus sp., Pinnixa franciscana, Pinnixa tubicola, Pagurus longicarpus, Petrolisthes cabrilloi, Portunus xantusii, Hemigrapsus oregonensis, Heptacarpus brevirostris), DNA barcoding allowed the matching of different life-cycle stages (zoea, megalops, adult).
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts on California Vegetation: Physiology, Life History, and Ecosystem Change
    CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON CALIFORNIA VEGETATION: PHYSIOLOGY, LIFE HISTORY, AND ECOSYSTEM CHANGE A White Paper from the California Energy Commission’s California Climate Change Center Prepared for: California Energy Commission Prepared by: University of California, Berkeley JULY 2012 CEC‐500‐2012‐023 William K. Cornwell1,2 Stephanie A. Stuart3 Aaron Ramirez1 Christopher R. Dolanc4 James H. Thorne4 David D. Ackerly1 1University of California, Berkeley 2 Vrije University, Netherlands 3Macquarie University, Australia 4University of California, Davis DISCLAIMER This paper was prepared as the result of work sponsored by the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this paper; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This paper has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the California Energy Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this paper. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgements are provided in each section of this paper. i ABSTRACT Dominant plant species mediate many ecosystem services, including carbon storage, soil retention, and water cycling. One of the uncertainties with climate change effects on terrestrial ecosystems is understanding where transitions in dominant vegetation, often termed state change, will occur. The complex nature of state change requires multiple lines of evidence. Here, we present four lines of inquiry into climate change effects on dominant vegetation, focusing on the likelihood and nature of climate change–driven state change.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideas. Where to Stay and Eat in Gargano Published on Iitaly.Org (
    Ideas. Where to Stay and Eat in Gargano Published on iItaly.org (http://iitaly.org) Ideas. Where to Stay and Eat in Gargano I. I. (July 21, 2016) For some years now, Gargano has striven to become a superior tourist destination. Its historical centers have been restored, giving rise to popular hotels and unique B&Bs. Talented chefs have introduced a cuisine that blends tradition with innovation, and small restaurants are opening or being renovated on every street corner. Finally, handicraft is being reintroduced with all the charm it once had. Here we propose just a few places to stay and eat that will get your mouth watering. Where to Stay: Relax and Enjoy B&B Casanita Via Simone Vestano 16 Vieste (Foggia) Page 1 of 3 Ideas. Where to Stay and Eat in Gargano Published on iItaly.org (http://iitaly.org) ◗ www.bbcasanita.com [2] On the rugged coast-line of Vieste, with white walls overlooking the sea and lush greenery, you will find some of the most popular tourist properties in Gargano. Not far from the lively historical center, situated right in front of the Castello di Federico II, there is a B&B with only four rooms and two spacious terraces, from which you can enjoy spectacular views. B&B Casanita will provide a rare experience due to the particular attention it has paid to conserving the typical architectural characteristics of the town. Zia Nì Localita Valle Sant’Elia Peschici (Foggia) ◗ www.ziani.it [3] Mario and his wife, Lynse, are the owners of the Zia Nì B&B, a countryside villa with four contemporary-style rooms.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael N Dawson
    M. N Dawson CV page 1 of 40 CURRICULUM VITAE — MICHAEL N DAWSON University of California, Merced 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, USA [email protected] / [email protected] CONTENTS PAGE EDUCATION 2 RESEARCH APPOINTMENTS 2 Research Positions, Field Research Experience PUBLICATIONS 3 Journal Articles (71), Book Chapters (9), Book Reviews (3), Correspondence & Commentaries (5), Editorials (11), Technical Reports & Information Booklets (5), Popular Articles (3), Submitted Articles (2), Internet resources & Videos (9) AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS 13 RESEARCH GRANTS 15 INVITED SEMINARS 19 SYMPOSIUM AND WORKSHOP ORGANIZATION 22 WORKING GROUPS 23 WORKSHOPS & TRAINING 23 CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS 24 Plenary / Keynote, Invited, Oral, Poster TEACHING EXPERIENCE 29 Teaching Positions, Guest Lectures, Seminar Organization, Course Development, Professional Development, Postdoctoral scholars mentored, Student Supervision, Educational Outreach SERVICE 35 Centre / Graduate Groups / School, UC Merced, University of California, National, International, Consulting PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS 40 M. N Dawson CV page 2 of 40 EDUCATION back to index page 2000 Ph.D., Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA. Thesis: “Molecular variation and evolution in coastal marine taxa.” 1994 M.Sc., Biological Computation, University of York, England. Thesis: “REEFISH: modelling coral reef fisheries.” 1993 B.Sc., Marine Biology, University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, England. Thesis: “Hylleberg’s concept of ‘gardening’ and the nutrition of Arenicola marina (Linné).” RESEARCH APPOINTMENTS back to index page Research Positions July 17 – Present Full Professor, University of California, Merced. July 12 – Jun 17 Associate Professor, University of California, Merced. Oct 06 – Jun 12 Assistant Professor, University of California, Merced. Mar 05 – Sep 06 Post-doctoral Researcher, w/ R. K. Grosberg, University of California, Davis.
    [Show full text]
  • The MMS-UC Cooperative Research Programs
    The MMS-UC Cooperative Research Programs Briefing Document November 1999 The MMS-UC Cooperative Research Programs Briefing Document November 1999 Russell J. Schmitt Director, Coastal Research Center Marine Science Institute University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106 Mission of the Coastal Research Center The Coastal Research Center of the Marine Science Institute, UC Santa Barbara, facilitates research and research training that foster a greater understanding of the causes and consequences of dynamics within and among coastal marine ecosystems. An explicit focus involves the application of innovative but basic research to help resolve coastal environmental issues. Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Southern California Educational Initiative and Coastal Marine Institute, which is jointly funded by the Minerals Management Service and the University of California. The report is not a required "deliverable" to the Minerals Management Service contract agreement numbers 14-35-0001-30761 and 14-35-0001-30758, and it has not been reviewed by the Service. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the Program and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Availability of Report This report is available as a PDF file on our web site: http://128.111.226.115/cmi A limited number of extra copies of this report is available. To order, please write to: Bonnie Williamson Coastal Research Center Marine Science Institute University of California Santa Barbara, California 93106 email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 1 Research Projects Funded ............................................................................................. 7 Southern California Educational Initiative..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Placer County
    CCoouunnttyy ooff PPllaacceerr Natural Communities Conservation Plan Habitat Conservation Plan Phase One Report of the Science Advisors January 8, 2004 Preface * This document is a requirement of the Natural Communities Conservation Plan Act (Act) of 2002 (California Fish and Game Code 2800-2840). Independent scientific counsel and input is required to advise the Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) planning process and help provide sound principles for conservation, species protection, and adaptive management. The Science Advisors were selected by Placer County based on criteria provided by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) in Guidance for the NCCP Independent Science Advisory Process (August 2002). Members of the Science Advisors were selected due to their expertise in a particular field of landscape ecology or biology, strong publication record and/or record of scientific leadership, objectivity, and ability to function well within a team. Science Advisor qualifications were reviewed and approved by the CDFG. The following Science Advisors were selected: Peter Brussard, University of Nevada Frank Davis, University of California at Santa Barbara Joseph Medieros, Sierra College Bruce Pavlik, Mills College Donald Sada, Desert Research Institute The Science Advisors met independently to discuss the Placer County NCCP, review available data, and determine their collective recommendations for the NCCP planning process, which are outlined in the following report. This report was prepared by the Science Advisors independent
    [Show full text]
  • Open Ocean Intake Effects Study
    City of Santa Cruz Water Department & Soquel Creek Water District scwd2 Desalination Program Open Ocean Intake Effects Study December 2010 Submitted to: Ms. Heidi Luckenbach City of Santa Cruz 212 Locust Street Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Prepared by: Environmental ESLO2010-017.1 [Blank Page] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Tenera Environmental wishes to acknowledge the valuable contributions of the Santa Cruz Water Department, Soquel Creek Water District, and scwd² Task Force in conducting the Open Ocean Intake Effects Study. Specifically, Tenera would like to acknowledge the efforts of: City of Santa Cruz Water Department Soquel Creek Water District Bill Kocher, Director Laura Brown, General Manager Linette Almond, Engineering Manager Melanie Mow Schumacher, Public Information Heidi R. Luckenbach, Program Coordinator Coordinator Leah Van Der Maaten, Associate Engineer Catherine Borrowman, Professional and Technical scwd² Task Force Assistant Ryan Coonerty Todd Reynolds, Kennedy/Jenks and scwd² Bruce Daniels Technical Advisor Bruce Jaffe Dan Kriege Thomas LaHue Don Lane Cynthia Mathews Mike Rotkin Ed Porter Tenera’s project team included the following members: David L. Mayer, Ph.D., Tenera Environmental President and Principal Scientist John Steinbeck, Tenera Environmental Vice President and Principal Scientist Carol Raifsnider, Tenera Environmental Director of Operations and Principal Scientist Technical review and advice was provided by: Pete Raimondi, Ph.D., UCSC, Professor of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology in the Earth and Marine Sciences Dept. Gregor
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Decommissioning and Valorisation of Oil&Gas Rigs In
    Exploring Decommissioning and Valorisation of Oil&Gas rigs in Sustainable and Circular Economy Frameworks Renata Archetti Valerio Cozzani Stefano Valentini Giacomo Segurini M.Gabriella Gaeta Stefano Valentini DICAM DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA CIVILE, CHIMICA, AMBIENTALE E DEI MATERIALI e-DevSus Exploring Decommissioning and Valorisation of Oil&Gas rigs in Sustainable and Circular Economy Frameworks ALMA MATER STUDIORUM · UNIVERSITA’ DI BOLOGNA DICAM DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA CIVILE, CHIMICA, AMBIENTALE E DEI MATERIALI ALMA MATER STUDIORUM – UNIVERSITA’ DI BOLOGNA DICAM – Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering Viale Risorgimento 2, I-40136 Bologna, Italy Authors: University of Bologna: Renata Archetti, Valerio Cozzani, Giacomo Segurini, M.Gabriella Gaeta ART-ER S.Cons.p.a: Stefano Valentini (Research and Innovation Division) ALMA MATER STUDIORUM · UNIVERSITA’ DI BOLOGNA DICAM DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA CIVILE, CHIMICA, AMBIENTALE E DEI MATERIALI Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Offshore Platform Composition ............................................................................................ 6 1.2 Decommissioning process ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Master Plan for Fisheries: a Guide for Implementing the Marine
    2018 Master Plan for Fisheries A Guide for Implementation of the Marine Life Management Act June 2018 State of California The Natural Resources Agency Department of Fish and Wildlife Acknowledgements The Marine Life Management Act (Appendix A) emphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement in all areas of management, including the development and revision of the Master Plan. The Department thanks and acknowledges Tribes and tribal communities, and stakeholders for the thoughtful input that has been provided in a range of venues and formats throughout the two-year development of this 2018 Master Plan. The Department also appreciates the generous funding from the Ocean Protection Council and the Resources Legacy Fund, and the numerous partners who provided background material and tools for consideration as part of the preparation of the 2018 Master Plan. See Appendix B for a complete list of these partnerships and engagement efforts. Executive summary The Marine Life Management Act (MLMA) is California’s primary fisheries management law. It directs the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department) to develop a Master Plan to guide its implementation. The original Master Plan, adopted in 2001, is being updated to reflect new priorities and emerging management strategies for achieving the MLMA’s goals, and to better describe the Department’s inclusion of MLMA principles in management decisions. The 2018 Master Plan (Master Plan) replaces the original and is re-structured to better meet the specific management objectives identified in the MLMA. It is intended to be both a roadmap and a toolbox for implementation, providing guidance and direction in the following areas: Prioritization of management efforts The Master Plan includes an interim list of prioritized species for management action based on the results of a Productivity and Susceptibility Analysis (PSA).
    [Show full text]