Theleicesterdrinker
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report to the Development Control and Regulatory Board – 13Th November 2003
REPORT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CONTROL AND REGULATORY BOARD – 13TH NOVEMBER 2003 PROPOSED DEFINITIVE MAP MODIFICATION ORDER UPGRADING OF PUBLIC FOOTPATH C9 TO A BRIDLEWAY (C10) AND ADDITION OF PUBLIC FOOTPATH C104 AT SCOTLAND, BURTON OVERY REPORT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE PART A PURPOSE 1. The purpose of this report is to seek the Board’s approval of the above- mentioned proposal. Recommendation 2. It is recommended that an Order be made under the provisions of Section 53 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, the effect of which will be to upgrade footpath C9 to a bridleway and also add footpath C104 at Scotland, Burton Overy to the Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way for Leicestershire, as shown on the plan attached to this report. Reason for Recommendation 3. That the statutory criteria in Section 53 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, have been met by historic evidence which supports the proposed modifications to the Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way. Circulation under Sensitive Issues Procedure 4. Dr. R.K.A. Feltham, County Councillor. Officer to Contact 5. Mr. Gary Jackson, Chief Executive’s Department, Tel 0116 2656159. PART B Background 6. During survey work carried out by an officer of this Council, it was observed that an inconsistency may exist between the use of the routes on the ground and the routes recorded on the Definitive Map. 7. Following investigation of the routes in question by the Director of Community Services, the matter is now being processed under the provisions of Section 53 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. -
BURTON OVERY DIRECTORY All Welcome – Just Contact the Organiser Interest in the Countryside
Burton Overy Village Clubs Norton and Gaulby Young Farmers meet to share an BURTON OVERY DIRECTORY All welcome – just contact the organiser interest in the countryside. Young people up to 26 yrs. Provides socialising, competing and visits. Contact the Photographic Society meets each Thurs evening in the Information and services for residents of the Parish. County Organiser on 01664 434532 village hall. Contact Graham Thomson – 259 XXX or [email protected] In an emergency call 999 for the Police, Fire and USEFUL TELEPHONE NUMBERS Ambulance. Spectaculars Community Choir sings in The Bell Inn Doctors To report a non emergency crime or other Police every Monday evening at 7.30pm. Contact Helen Egerton Billesdon Surgery: 4 Market Place. Tel: 259 6206 matter, call 101. For information about your local police on [email protected] or 07540 227560 Kibworth Health Centre, Smeeton Road. Tel: 279 visit: https://leics.police.uk/local-policing/stations/market- 3308 harborough Flower and Garden Club provides meetings and outings. Great Glen Surgery is a branch surgery to Kibworth Demonstrations are held on the first Thursday of each Nearest Accident and Emergency Centre is the Leicester Health Centre. Tel: 259 2353 month, March to October. Members provide and arrange Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester. LE1 5WW Tel: flowers in church on a monthly rota and for church festivals http://www.kibworth-gps.co.uk/ 0300 303 1573 and village events. Contact Joan Stephens- 259 2210 or e- Kibworth Old School Surgery, 2A Station Road. Tel: For Health advice out of hours call NHS Direct on 111 or mail: [email protected] 279 2422 visit Urgent Care Centres (minor Injury and Illness) at: Dentists Friendship Club meets in the third week each month on a Oadby 18 The Parade, Oadby, LE2 5BJ. -
Bo to the World Corrections
[email protected] Burton Overy to the World by Frances Rouse, Jan 2012. (This article is produced here with the kind permission of Frances Rouse) • Also available in .pdf (PDF, 1.5 Mb) In the Lady Chapel of St Andrew's, Burton Overy, near the parish chest, is a monumental slab dedicated as follows: Here lie the bodies of WILLIAM, PATTY and PEGGY SULTZER children of JOHN AND CHRISTIAN SULTZER of this parish. WILLIAM died the 9th June 1773 aged 14 months. PATTY died 6th July 1779 aged 11 weeks. PEGGY died the 3 of August 1779 aged 15 weeks. (L5) Photo: Toni Smith When Toni Smith and her colleagues transcribed this they couldn't have known that a descendant of the Sultzers would one day find their work invaluable in tracing several branches of her family tree. Nichols (i) [email protected] Christian (nee Woodward) was the daughter of William Woodward (born 26.8.1709) and Ann Dolby (of Burton Overy;) they were married at Illston on the Hill c.1744; Ann was born there about 1724 and died 15.2.1792; she was the daughter of William Dalby(sic) (1692-1750) and his second wife Ann and the family were probably related to Rev. Chapman Dolby. (See further Woodward information below.) But how did the non-English name "Sultzer" appear in this small rural Leicestershire village? The connection seems to have begun with the Inclosure of 1765/6 when John Sultzer, whose origins are unfortunately unknown, arrived in the area to undertake the surveying, so crucial to this process. -
University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire. -
Launde Priory 1
21 MAY 2018 LAUNDE PRIORY 1 actswilliam2henry1.wordpress.com Release date Version notes Who Current version: H1-Launde-2018-1 21/5/2018 Original version DXC Previous versions: — — — — This text is made available through the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs License; additional terms may apply Authors for attribution statement: Charters of William II and Henry I Project David X Carpenter, Faculty of History, University of Oxford LAUNDE PRIORY Augustinian priory of St John the Baptist County of Leicestershire : Diocese of Lincoln Founded 1121 × c. 1125 Launde priory was one of the early Augustinian houses in England, established 1120 × c. 1125. According to a narrative concerning the early years of Holy Trinity priory in Aldgate, London, known only from fifteenth-century manuscripts, Bernard prior of Dunstaple, John prior of Launde (Landa), Geoffrey de Clinton, the (king’s) chamberlain (Gaufridus camerarius de Clinton), and others named, witnessed the gift of the Cnihtengild in London to Holy Trinity in that year. It is unsurprising that the priors of two recently founded Augustinian houses should witness a gift to Holy Trinity, thought to be the first Augustinian house in England. Their names were presumably taken from a contemporary deed or other record which has not been preserved (Hodgett, Cartulary of Holy Trinity, 168, no. 871; R. R. Sharpe, Calendar of Letter Books, C, 220). The king’s confirmation of the gift, 000, Regesta 1467, also witnessed by Geoffrey de Clinton, is apparently authentic and datable 1123 × 1127, so the narrative’s date of 1125 may well be accurate. Launde priory was founded at Loddington, ‘in cuius territorio abbatia fundata est’, according to Henry II’s general confirmation of 1155 × 1158 (H2/1456). -
The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the Family, the Fief and the Feudal Monarchy*
© K.S.B. Keats-Rohan 1991. Published Nottingham Mediaeval Studies 36 (1992), 42-78 The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the family, the fief and the feudal monarchy* In memoriam R.H.C.Davis 1. The Problem (i) the non-Norman Conquest Of all the available studies of the Norman Conquest none has been more than tangentially concerned with the fact, acknowledged by all, that the regional origin of those who participated in or benefited from that conquest was not exclusively Norman. The non-Norman element has generally been regarded as too small to warrant more than isolated comment. No more than a handful of Angevins and Poitevins remained to hold land in England from the new English king; only slightly greater was the number of Flemish mercenaries, while the presence of Germans and Danes can be counted in ones and twos. More striking is the existence of the fief of the count of Boulogne in eastern England. But it is the size of the Breton contingent that is generally agreed to be the most significant. Stenton devoted several illuminating pages of his English Feudalism to the Bretons, suggesting for them an importance which he was uncertain how to define.1 To be sure, isolated studies of these minority groups have appeared, such as that of George Beech on the Poitevins, or those of J.H.Round and more recently Michael Jones on the Bretons.2 But, invaluable as such studies undoubtedly are, they tend to achieve no more for their subjects than the status of feudal curiosities, because they detach their subjects from the wider question of just what was the nature of the post-1066 ruling class of which they formed an integral part. -
Great Glen Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Statement
Appendix 1 Great Glen Neighbourhood Plan Consultation Statement Introduction 1.1 This Consultation Statement has been prepared to fulfil the legal obligations of the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012. Section 15(2) of Part 5 of the Regulations sets out what a Consultation Statement should contain. According to the Regulations, a Consultation Statement: a) contains details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed neighbourhood development plan; b) explains how they were consulted; c) summarises the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; d) describes how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant, addressed in the proposed Neighbourhood Plan. The purpose of this document This document provides a record of the engagement that took place regarding the Great Glen Neighbourhood Plan area and related Neighbourhood Planning body. The main methods used to publicise the engagement process are also documented, along with the main findings from the engagement. A formal engagement period provided members of the public and other key stakeholders an opportunity to submit comment on the proposed neighbourhood plan area and proposed neighbourhood planning body for Ripley. The proposed neighbourhood planning body was Great Glen Parish Council and the proposed neighbourhood planning area is shown in Fig 1. Below Figure 1 Neighbourhood Area – designated on 4 June 2014 Page 1 of 8 Regulations and government guidance: Stage 1: defining the neighbourhood The local community was required to decide how they intended to work together to undertake the production of the Neighbourhood Plan. Great Glen is a ‘parished’ area therefore, the Parish Council has led on the neighbourhood planning process. -
Planning Committee
PLANNING COMMITTEE APPLICATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS FOR DETERMINATION BY COMMITTEE 12/00711/FUL – Carlton Curlieu Erection of one wind turbine (102m to tip of Hospital Estate blade) and associated ancillary infrastructure at Land OS 6256, Main Street, Carlton Target Date: 08.10.2012 Curlieu Recommendation: REFUSE for the following reasons, The proposal, by virtue of the size, siting, design and prominence of the turbine, would appear as a dominant and visually intrusive feature in the landscape, and would detrimentally affect the character of the local High Leicestershire landscape. The proposed development is therefore contrary to Policy CS9, CS11 and CS17 of the Harborough District Core Strategy and Regional Plan Policy 40. The proposal does not demonstrate that it will not harm habitats or species which are protected or which are of importance to biodiversity and is therefore contrary to Policy CS8 of the Core Strategy. Site/Context: The site is located in the countryside and is agricultural. The nearest villages are Carlton Curlieu to the north east of the site and Burton Overy to the north west. The nearest dwelling is The New House on Main Street, Carlton Curlieu, which is 880m away. The site is well away from any other built form and is outside any village boundary or defined Limits to Development. The closest listed building is St Mary’s Church in Carlton Curlieu (approximately 1040m away). The listed gates at Carlton Curlieu Hall are approximately 1070m from the site and Carlton Curlieu Hall is approximately 1140m from the site. The Proposal : The proposal is for a single direct drive turbine with a rated capacity of 500Kw. -
Belgrave Stuart Galloway
U3A WTT Belgrave Stuart Galloway Route Summary A circular walk around historic Belgrave. Route Overview Category: Walking Length: 6.430 km / 4.02 mi Parking: The Sidings LE4 3BR Last Modified: 1st March 2017 Difficulty: Medium Rating: Unrated Surface: Average Refreshments: Platform Cafe The Sidings Date Published: 1st March 2017 Description This is an urban walk which crosses several busy roads so care should be taken. Some muddy patches after rain along the river. Waypoints Great Central Railway (52.66658; -1.13374) The Great Central Railway is now a heritage railway which links Leicester and Nottingham. Leicester North Station is the southernmost station. It is on the route of the original railway that linked Manchester, Sheffield, Nottingham and Leicester with London Marylebone. It was originally called Belgrave and Birstall Station. Following Beecham's sentence of death it became derelict but was restored by the Main Line Steam Trust and is now the site of a proposed new heritage railway museum. Backed by £10 million from the Heritage Lottery Fund, it is set to open in 2021 Walk down The Sidings, turn left and proceed a few yards along Redhill Way, turning left into Belgrave Cemetery Belgrave Cemetry (52.66637; -1.13221) 1 / 7 During the 1800's owing to the rapidly expanding towns and cities, sanitation was becoming appalling with diseases; such as cholera becoming mass killers. Up until about the middle of the 1800's those who died in urban areas such as Belgrave were buried in urban churchyards and had been for about 850 years since the Norman Conquest. -
An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment for Land Off Seagrave Road, Sileby, Leicestershire (SK 610 158)
An archaeological desk-based assessment for land off Seagrave Road, Sileby, Leicestershire (SK 610 158) Leon Hunt ULAS Report No 2011-202 ©2012 An archaeological desk-based assessment for land off Seagrave Road, Sileby, Leicestershire (SK 610 158) Leon Hunt for: Hazelton Homes Checked by: Signed: Date: ……18.01.2012……. Name: ...Patrick Clay........................... University of Leicester Archaeological Services University Rd., Leicester, LE1 7RH Tel: (0116) 2522848 Fax: (0116) 2522614 ULAS Report Number 2011-202 ©2012 CONTENTS Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Aims and Methods ......................................................................................................... 1 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 2 Site Location, Geology and Topography ....................................................................... 3 Historical and Archaeological Background ................................................................... 4 Historical Background ................................................................................................... 4 Archaeological Background ........................................................................................... 5 Prehistoric ............................................................................................................. -
Domesday in Rutland — the Dramatis Personae
Domesday Book in Rutland The Dramatis Personae Prince Yuri Galitzine DOMESDAY BOOK IN RUTLAND The Dramatis Personae by Prince Yuri Galitzine Rutland Record Society 1986 1986 Published by Rutland Record Society Rutland County Museum, Oakham LE15 6HW © Prince Yuri Galitzine 1986 ISBN 0907464 05 X The extract Roteland by courtesy of Leicestershire Museums and the Domesday Map of Rutland by courtesy of the General Editor, Victoria County History of Rutland The Dramatis Personae of Domesday Book The story of Domesday Book only comes alive when we try to find more about those persons who are mentioned in it by name. The Domesday Book records the names of each of three categories of landowners – the tenants‑in‑chief and the tenants in 1086 – TRW = Tempore Regis Guilielmi and the antecessors, the name given to those who held in 1066 – TRE = Tempore Regis Edwardii. Throughout the whole of England about 200 tenants‑in‑chief arc recorded in Domesday Book holding from the King as overlord of whom 15 held in Rutland. About another 5,000 throughout England held as tenants directly of the King or of his tenants‑in‑chief by knight’s fees. Of the latter, there were 16 in Rutland. Sadly the majority of persons referred to in the record are not identified by name. These are people the landowners controlled and who were established in the villages of Rutland. They comprised 10 priests, 142 freemen, 1147 villagers, 244 small holders and 21 slaves (two of whom were women) ‑ a total of 1564. The tenants-in-chief Not unnaturally as Rutland had been the dowry of the Queens of England since 964, King William had in his direct control the largest share of the lands in Rutland – 24 carucates and 39 hides comprising the town of Oakham and 14 manors valued at £193 12s. -
HARBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL OPEN SPACE/SPORT and RECREATIONAL FACILITIES and ASSESSMENT of LOCAL NEEDS FINAL REPORT by PMP In
HARBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL OPEN SPACE/SPORT AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND ASSESSMENT OF LOCAL NEEDS FINAL REPORT BY PMP in association with Donaldsons JUNE 2004 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary What is the aim of this open space, sport and recreation study? The study aims to provide a clear picture of existing and future needs for open space, sport and recreation in Harborough and the current ability to meet those needs in terms of quality, quantity and accessibility. The study sets local standards based on assessments of local needs, demographics and audits of existing open spaces. It is the basis for addressing quantitative and qualitative deficiencies through the planning process and should form the basis of the development of an open space strategy for Harborough DC. Scope of the open space and sport and recreation study The study includes all open space and recreation types identified within the latest Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 (Planning for Open Space Sport and Recreation, July 2002) and its Companion Guide (September 2002). These include parks and gardens, natural and semi-natural areas, green corridors, amenity greenspace, provision for children and young people, outdoor sports facilities, allotments, cemeteries and churchyards and civic spaces. The study also considers the provision of sport and indoor recreation facilities. What is the need for the study of open space, sport and recreation? A local assessment of open space and open space needs will enable the Council to: • plan positively, creatively and effectively in identifying priority areas for improvement and to target appropriate types of open space required • ensure an adequate provision of high quality, accessible open space to meet the needs of community • ensure any accessible funding is invested in the right places where there is the most need • conduct S106 negations with developers from a position of knowledge with evidence to support.