DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF-Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF-Document Review A Meta-Analysis of the Analgesic Efficacy of Single-Doses of Ibuprofen Compared to Traditional Non-Opioid Analgesics Following Third Molar Surgery Lorenzo Franco-de la Torre 1, Norma Patricia Figueroa-Fernández 2, Diana Laura Franco-González 1, Ángel Josabad Alonso-Castro 3, Federico Rivera-Luna 2 and Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza 1,* 1 Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias Médicas, Departamento de Clínicas, División de Ciencias Biomédicas, Centro Universitario de los Altos, Universidad de Guadalajara, Tepatitlán de Morelos, 47620, Mexico; [email protected] (L.F.-d.T.); [email protected] (D.L.F.-G.) 2 Departamento de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Campus Mexicali, 21040, Mexico; [email protected] (N.P.F.-F.); [email protected] (F.R.-L.) 3 Departamento de Farmacia, División de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad de Guanajuato, 36250, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 52-378-119-5786. Table S1. Features summary of the high-quality studies. Patients, evaluation period, First author, study design Evaluation of the clinical Treatments (n) and number of molars Adverse effects Conclusion and, and analgesic strategy efficacy extracted Ahlström et al., 1993 Group A: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=32). Healthy patients. Pain was evaluated by VAS Diclofenac presented a Ibuprofen and diclofenac Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Diclofenac 50 mg (n=35). Assessment period was 6 h. at 20 and 40 minutes as well high incidence of adverse produced similar pain relief- parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Placebo (n=30). A mandibular third molar as 1 to 6 post-surgical h. effects when compared to analgesia. Single-dose study. All treatments were administered using the removed. ibuprofen and placebo Post-operative analgesia. oral route. Bakshi et al., 1994. Group A: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=80). Healthy patients. Pain at 20 and 40 minutes, as Similar adverse effect were Diclofenac produced rapid Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Diclofenac 50 mg (n=83). Assessment period was 6 h. well as 1 to 6 post-surgical h observed for all treatments onset of analgesic effect in parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Placebo (n=82). One mandibular third molar with VAS, and VRS. Other comparison with ibuprofen Single-dose study. All treatments were administered using the extracted. variables were TOTPAR-6, and placebo. Post-operative analgesia. oral route. and global evaluation of treatments. Christensen et al., 2017. Group A: Ibuprofen 600 mg (n=109). Good health patients. Pain relief, PID, SPID, time Eleven patients receiving Ibuprofen presented faster Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Naproxen sodium 220 mg (n=58). The evaluation period was 24 to confirmed first ibuprofen and six patients onset and superior analgesia parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Placebo (n=29). h. perceptible relief, time to taking naproxen sodium than naproxen sodium. Single- and multi-dose study. (Clinical study 1). A third molar surgery. meaningful pain relief, time had adverse effects. Post-operative analgesia. to treatment failure, and percentage of treatment failures. Forbes et al., 1991. Group A: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=37). Patients without clinical PID-4, PID-8, SPID-4, SPID- Similar number of adverse Bromfenac 25 mg and Randomized, double-blind, Group B. Aspirin 650 mg (n=41). significand condition. 8, peak PID score 4 and 8 h, effects were observed in all ibuprofen 400 mg were parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Bromfenac 5 mg (n=39). One to four third molar pain relief, TOTPAR-4, groups. significantly superior to the Single-dose study. Group D: Bromfenac 10 mg (n=43). extractions. TOTPAR-8 peak pain relief, other active treatments. Post-operative analgesia. Group E: Bromfenac 25 mg (n=42). Patients were evaluated total hours of 50% relief, and Group F: Placebo (n=39). during 8 h after surgery. overall evaluation. Forbes et al., 1992. Group A: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=38). Patients without clinical PID, SPID, peak PID score, Similar frequency of Bromfenac 100 mg was more Randomized, double-blind, Group B. Aspirin 650 mg (n=38). significand condition. pain relief, TOTPAR-8, peak adverse effects were effective than ibuprofen. parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Bromfenac 10 mg (n=43). One to four third molar pain relief, total hours of observed in all groups. Single-dose study. Group D: Bromfenac 25 mg (n=41). extractions. 50% relief, and overall Post-operative analgesia. Group E: Bromfenac 50 mg (n=42). Patients were evaluated evaluation. Group F: Bromfenac 100 mg (n=40) during 8 h after surgery. Placebo (n=38). Hersh, et al., 1993. Group A: Ibuprofen 200 mg (n=51). Patients with good health. Pain intensity evaluation, Similar number of adverse The high dose of ibuprofen Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=49). One or more third molar PID, SPID, peak PID score, effects were recorded. and meclofenamate were parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Meclofenamate 50 (n=51). surgeries. pain relief, TOTPAR-8, peak most effective than the lower Single- and multi-dose study. Group D: Meclofenamate 100 (n=52). Patients were evaluated 8 h pain relief, overall doses of these agents after Post-operative analgesia. Group E: Placebo (n=51). following surgery. evaluation, and time to third molar surgery. remedication. Hersh, et al., 2000. Group A: Ibuprofen 200 mg. Patients with good health. TOTPAR-2, TOTPAR-6, All treatments were well Ibuprofen (200 and 400 mg) Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Ibuprofen 400 mg. One or more third molar SPID-2, SPID-6, onset of tolerated, with no serious was superior to parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Acetaminophen 1000 mg. surgeries. analgesia, and peak side effects reported. acetaminophen. Single- and multi-dose study. Group D: Placebo. Patients were evaluated 6 h analgesia effect, Post-operative analgesia. following surgery. remedication, and overall evaluation. Joshi et al., 2004. Group A: Ibuprofen 600 mg (n=31). Patients ASA I and II. Pain intensity was assessed There was no significant There was not difference Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Diclofenac 100 mg (n=29). A third molar extraction. using the VAS and VRS. difference among the between active treatments. parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Paracetamol 1000 mg and Codeine The evaluation period was 24 Time for the first analgesic groups. Single-dose study. 60 mg (n=30). h. and number of analgesic in Pre-operative analgesia. Group D: Placebo (n=29). the post-operative period were evaluated. Mehlisch et al., 2010a. Group A: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=69). Healthy patients. SPIDR-4, SPRID-6, SPRID-8, Similar frequency of Ibuprofen/acetaminophen Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Acetaminophen 1000 mg (n=34). Two or more third molar TOTPAR-4, TOTPAR-6, adverse effects between all combination produced better parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Ibuprofen 400 mg/acetaminophen surgeries. TOTPAR-6, re-medication, treatments. analgesia than ibuprofen or Single-dose study. 1000 mg (n=67). Assessment period was 8 h. and global evaluation. acetaminophen alone. Post-operative analgesia. Group D: Ibuprofen 200 mg / acetaminophen 500 mg (n=33). Group E: Placebo (n=31). Mehlisch et al., 2010b. Group A: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=74). Healthy patients. SPID-4, SPID-6, SPID-8, There was no significant Ibuprofen/acetaminophen Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Ibuprofen 200 mg (n=75). At least 3 lower third molar TOTPAR-4, TOTPAR-6, difference among the mixture was more effective parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Acetaminophen 1000 mg (n=74). surgeries. TOTPAR-6, re-medication, groups. than either drug alone. Single-dose study. Group D: Acetaminophen 500 mg (n=76). Assessment period was 8 h. and overall assessment of Post-operative analgesia. Group E: Ibuprofen 400 and acetaminophen study medication. 1000 mg (n=149). Group F: Ibuprofen 200 mg and acetaminophen 500 mg (n=143). Group G: Ibuprofen 100 mg and acetaminophen 250 mg (n=71). Group H: Placebo (n=73). Morrison et al., 2000. Group A: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=127). Healthy patients and patients TOTPAR, onset of analgesia, Adverse effects of Rofecoxib provides analgesic Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Naproxen sodium 550 mg (n=140). with controlled systemic and peak analgesia effect, ibuprofen, naproxen efficacy similar a naproxen parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Placebo (n=275). disease. and overall evaluation. sodium, and placebo were sodium. Single-dose study. At least one mandibular third no shown. Post-operative analgesia. molar surgery. The evaluation was done through 24 hours. Olson et al., 2001. Group A: Ibuprofen 400 mg (n=67). Healthy patients. PRID, TOTPAR-2, TOTPAR- According to the Ibuprofen was superior to all Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Ketoprofen 25 mg (n=67). One or more third molar 6, SPID-2, SPID-6, SPRID-2, treatments, the adverse treatments. parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Acetaminophen 1000 mg (n=66). surgeries. SPRID-6, and the patient’s effects were next: Single-dose study. Group D: Placebo (n=39). Duration of trial was 6 hours overall evaluation of the 5.1% who received Post-operative analgesia. study medication. placebo. 7.5% in ketoprofen. 10.4% in ibuprofen 15.2% in acetaminophen. Planas et al., 1998. Group A: Ibuprofen 600 mg (n=74). Patients with sufficient mental Pain was evaluated using There was no difference Metamizol 2000 mg was Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Metamizol 1000 mg (n=75). status to complete the VAS and the verbal scale. between treatment groups. superior to ibuprofen and parallel, clinical trial. Group C: Metamizol 2000 mg (n=72). assessment PID and SPID were placebo for control of pain Single-dose study. Group D: Placebo (n=32). A third molar surgery. calculated. after surgery. Post-operative analgesia. Trial duration was 1 hour. Seymour et al., 1998. Group A: Ibuprofeno 400 mg (n=76). Healthy patients or patients AUC pain, AUC pain relief, There was no difference Ibuprofen was better Randomized, double-blind, Group B: Aceclofenac 150 mg (n=71).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Optum Essential Health Benefits Enhanced Formulary PDL January
    PENICILLINS ketorolac tromethamineQL GENERIC mefenamic acid amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium nabumetone amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium ER naproxen January 2016 ampicillin naproxen sodium ampicillin sodium naproxen sodium CR ESSENTIAL HEALTH BENEFITS ampicillin-sulbactam naproxen sodium ER ENHANCED PREFERRED DRUG LIST nafcillin sodium naproxen DR The Optum Preferred Drug List is a guide identifying oxacillin sodium oxaprozin preferred brand-name medicines within select penicillin G potassium piroxicam therapeutic categories. The Preferred Drug List may piperacillin sodium/ tazobactam sulindac not include all drugs covered by your prescription sodium tolmetin sodium drug benefit. Generic medicines are available within many of the therapeutic categories listed, in addition piperacillin sodium/tazobactam Fenoprofen Calcium sodium to categories not listed, and should be considered Meclofenamate Sodium piperacillin/tazobactam as the first line of prescribing. Tolmetin Sodium Amoxicillin/Clavulanate Potassium LOW COST GENERIC PREFERRED For benefit coverage or restrictions please check indomethacin your benefit plan document(s). This listing is revised Augmentin meloxicam periodically as new drugs and new prescribing LOW COST GENERIC naproxen kit information becomes available. It is recommended amoxicillin that you bring this list of medications when you or a dicloxacillin sodium CARDIOVASCULAR covered family member sees a physician or other penicillin v potassium ACE-INHIBITORS healthcare provider. GENERIC QUINOLONES captopril ANTI-INFECTIVES
    [Show full text]
  • Yellox, Bromfenac
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Yellox 0.9 mg/ml eye drops, solution 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION One ml of solution contains 0.9 mg bromfenac (as sodium sesquihydrate). One drop contains approximately 33 micrograms bromfenac. Excipient: Each ml of solution contains 50 micrograms of benzalkonium chloride. For a full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Eye drops, solution. Clear yellow solution. pH: 8.1-8.5; osmolality: 270-330 mOsmol/kg 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation following cataract extraction in adults. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology Use in adults, including the elderly The dose is one drop of Yellox in the affected eye(s) twice daily, beginning the next day after cataract surgery and continuing through the first 2 weeks of the postoperative period. The treatment should not exceed 2 weeks as safety data beyond this is not available. Paediatric population The safety and efficacy of bromfenac in paediatric patients has not been established. No data are available. Hepatic and renal impairment Yellox has not been studied in patients with hepatic disease or renal impairment. Method of administration For ocular use. If more than one topical ophtalmic medicinal product is being used, each one should be administered at least 5 minutes apart. To prevent contamination of the dropper-tip and solution, care must be taken not to touch the eyelids, surrounding areas or other surfaces with the dropper-tip of the bottle. Instruct patient to keep the bottle tightly closed when not in use.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Topical Bromfenac for Treating Ocular Pain and Inflammation Beyond Cataract Surgery: a Review of Published Studies
    Clinical Ophthalmology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Use of topical bromfenac for treating ocular pain and inflammation beyond cataract surgery: a review of published studies This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Clinical Ophthalmology Barry A Schechter Abstract: Topical ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are com- monly used to treat postoperative inflammation and pain following cataract surgery and for Cornea and Cataract Service, Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute, Boynton Beach, treatment and prophylaxis of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CME). Bromfenac is a FL, USA brominated NSAID with strong in vitro anti-inflammatory potency. Like other ophthalmic NSAIDs, bromfenac is often used outside of the cataract surgery setting. This paper provides an overview of bromfenac’s preclinical ocular pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, followed by a review of 23 published clinical studies in which various marketed bromfenac formula- tions were used for conditions other than cataract surgery or pseudophakic CME. These include: post-refractive eye surgery; macular edema associated with diabetes, uveitis, or fl For personal use only. retinal vein occlusion; in ammation associated with age-related macular degeneration; pain related to intravitreal injections; and other ocular anterior segment and surface disorders with an inflammatory component. The published evidence reviewed supports the safety and effectiveness of bromfenac in these additional ophthalmic indications. Bromfenac was well tolerated when given alone or in combination with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents, topical corticosteroids, or topical mast-cell stabilizers. The most common adverse event reported was ocular irritation. No serious adverse events (ie, corneal epithelial disorders) were reported, although the majority of studies did not systematically evaluate potential side effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Dysmenorrhoea (Review)
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea (Review) Marjoribanks J, Ayeleke RO, Farquhar C, Proctor M Marjoribanks J, Ayeleke RO, Farquhar C, Proctor M. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD001751. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub3. www.cochranelibrary.com Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea (Review) Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON . ..... 4 BACKGROUND .................................... 5 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 6 METHODS ...................................... 6 Figure1. ..................................... 8 Figure2. ..................................... 10 Figure3. ..................................... 12 RESULTS....................................... 14 Figure4. ..................................... 16 Figure5. ..................................... 18 Figure6. ..................................... 24 ADDITIONALSUMMARYOFFINDINGS . 25 DISCUSSION ..................................... 26 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 27 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 27 REFERENCES ..................................... 28 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 40 DATAANDANALYSES. 130 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 NSAIDs vs placebo, Outcome 1 Pain relief dichotomous data. 136
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Pain Group League Table of Analgesic Efficacy
    TOOLBOX The Oxford Pain Group League table of analgesic efficacy Derek Richards Director, Centre for Evidence-based Dentistry, Oxford, UK Evidence-Based Dentistry (2004) 5, 22–23. doi:10.1038/sj.ebd.6400237 The two Canadian Collaboration over many years by the Oxford Pain mised, double-blind, and single-dose on Clinical Practice Guidelines in Den- Research Group. studies in people with moderate to severe tistry (CCCD) discussed in this issue The information in the table has been pain. Drugs were oral, unless specified, of Evidence-Based Dentistry recommend derived from a large number of sys- and doses are given in milligrams. the use of analgesics rather than anti- tematic reviews of randomised, double- The relevance of this table to acute biotic therapy for acute apical abscess blind, single-dose studies in patients who dental pain has been raised in this where drainage cannot be achieved im- had moderate to severe pain. Each of the journal before in an editorial by Moore mediately, or in the treatment of reviews has the same outcome et al,1 when the author noted that dental acute apical periodontitis. Linked measure, at least 50% pain relief over pain is no different from other acute pain to this we have reproduced the Oxford 4–6 h. The pain measurements were models. League Table of Analgesic Efficacy: this is standardised, and have been validated. also freely available from the Oxford Pain Numbers-needed-to-treat are calculated 1. Moore A. The evidence base in acute pain. Evid Group internet site (www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/ for the proportion of subjects who Based Dent 2000; 2:32–33.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Ophthalmic Solution on Intraocular Pressure Reduction by Latanoprost K Kashiwagi, S Tsukahara
    297 CLINICAL SCIENCE Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.87.3.297 on 1 March 2003. Downloaded from Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ophthalmic solution on intraocular pressure reduction by latanoprost K Kashiwagi, S Tsukahara ............................................................................................................................. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:297–301 Aim: To investigate the effects of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ophthalmic solution on latanoprost induced intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction using normal volunteers. Methods: This study was conducted as a prospective and observer masked clinical trial. 13 normal volunteers were enrolled. After measurement of basal IOP and ophthalmic examination, latanoprost ophthalmic solution was initially administered to both eyes once daily. Four weeks later, an NSAID ophthalmic solution, sodium 2-amino-3-(4-bromobenzoyl) phenylacetate sesquihydrate (refer to bromfenac sodium hydrate), was co-administered to one randomly selected eye (NSAID group) twice daily for 2 weeks. The other eye was employed as a control (non-NSAID group). After withdrawal of the NSAID ophthalmic solution, latanoprost ophthalmic solution was continuously administered for another 2 weeks and was then withdrawn. After a 4 week washout, only bromfenac sodium hydrate See end of article for authors’ affiliations ophthalmic solution was administered to the eyes of the NSAID group for 2 weeks. During the study ....................... period, ophthalmic examination, including IOP measurement was performed in an observer masked fashion. Correspondence to: Results: Kenji Kashiwagi, MD, Before initiation of bromfenac sodium hydrate, baseline IOPs of the non-NSAID group and the Department of NSAID group were 15.73 (SD 1.97) mm Hg and 15.86 (2.06) mm Hg, respectively (p=0.88).
    [Show full text]
  • Bromfenac, Ophthalmic
    Prescription Label Patient Name: Species: Drug Name & Strength: Directions (amount to give how often & for how long): Prescribing Veterinarian's Name & Contact Information: Refills: [Content to be provided by prescribing veterinarian] Bromfenac, Ophthalmic (brome-fen-ak) Description: Topical Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Other Names for this Medication: Bromday® Common Dosage Forms: Veterinary: None. Human: 0.07% & 0.09% ophthalmic solution in a dropper bottle. This information sheet does not contain all available information for this medication. It is to help answer commonly asked questions and help you give the medication safely and effectively to your animal. If you have other questions or need more information about this medication, contact your veterinarian or pharmacist. Key Information Used to decrease inflammation in the eye. Use as advised to avoid contamination of the medication. Keep cap tightly closed when not in use. Wait 5 minutes after applying this medication before applying any other medications to the eye. Store in the refrigerator or at room temperature away from moisture and sunlight; do not freeze. Do not use if the color changes, becomes cloudy, or if particles are seen in the solution. Discard compounded gels on the discard date indicated by the compounding pharmacist. How is this medication useful? Bromfenac is used to treat inflammation of the eye (eg, after cataract surgery). It works by inhibiting substances called prostaglandins that cause inflammation. This drug may also be used to treat horses with moon blindness (ie, recurrent uveitis). The FDA (U.S. Food & Drug Administration) has approved this drug for use humans but not in animals. The FDA allows veterinarians to prescribe products containing this drug in different species or for other conditions in certain situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocular Disease Management 18Th18th Eeditiondition
    Joseph W. Sowka, OD Andrew S. Gurwood, OD Alan G. Kabat, OD Eyelids and Adnexa, PAGE 09 Conjunctiva and Sclera, PAGE 24 Corneal Disease, PAGE 35 Uvea and Glaucoma, PAGE 49 Vitreous and Retina, PAGE 66 Neuro-Ophthalmic Disease, PAGE 79 The Handbook of OCULAR DISEASE MANAGEMENT 18TH18TH EDITIONEDITION Supplement to JUNE 15, 2016 www.reviewofoptometry.com Dr. Sowka Dr. Gurwood Dr. Kabat 2016_RO_DiseaseGuide_Cover.indd 2 6/3/16 5:31 PM INDICATIONS AND USAGE ZYLET® (loteprednol etabonate 0.5% and tobramycin 0.3% ophthalmic suspension) is a topical anti-infective and corticosteroid combination for steroid-responsive infl ammatory ocular conditions for which a corticosteroid is indicated and where superfi cial bacterial ocular infection or a risk of bacterial ocular infection exists. Please see additional Indications and Usage information on adjacent page, including list of indicated organisms. RP0915_BL Zylet.indd 2 8/12/15 1:38 PM INDICATIONS AND USAGE (continued) Ocular steroids are indicated in infl ammatory conditions of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, cornea and anterior segment of the globe such as allergic conjunctivitis, acne rosacea, superfi cial punctate keratitis, herpes zoster keratitis, iritis, cyclitis, and where the inherent risk of steroid use in certain infective conjunctivitides is accepted to obtain a diminution in edema and infl ammation. They are also indicated in chronic anterior uveitis and corneal injury from chemical, radiation or thermal burns, or penetration of foreign bodies. The use of a combination drug with an anti-infective component is indicated where the risk of superfi cial ocular infection is high or where there is an expectation that potentially dangerous numbers of bacteria will be present in the eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocular Pharmacokinetics of 0.45% Ketorolac Tromethamine
    Clinical Ophthalmology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH Ocular pharmacokinetics of 0.45% ketorolac tromethamine Mayssa Attar1 Purpose: A new carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-containing ophthalmic formulation of 0.45% Rhett Schiffman2 ketorolac, pH 6.8 (Acuvail®) was recently developed for treatment of inflammation and pain Lisa Borbridge3 after cataract surgery. This study compared pharmacokinetics of the new formulation with that Quinn Farnes4 of a prior formulation, 0.4% ketorolac, pH 7.4 (Acular LS®). Devin Welty1 Methods: Ketorolac formulations were administered bilaterally (35 µL) to female New Zealand White rabbits. Samples from aqueous humor and iris-ciliary body were collected at multiple time 1Departments of Pharmacokinetics points, and ketorolac was quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. and Drug Metabolism, 2Global Production Enhancement, Results: In aqueous humor, the peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time 3Bioanalytical Sciences, 4Product curve (AUC ) of ketorolac were, respectively, 389 ng/mL and 939 ng·h/mL following admin- Formulation Development, Allergan 0–t Inc., Irvine, CA, USA istration of the CMC-containing 0.45% ketorolac, pH 6.8, and 211 ng/mL and 465 ng·hr/mL following administration of the 0.4% ketorolac, pH 7.4. In iris-ciliary body, Cmax and AUC0–t of ketorolac were, respectively 450 ng/g and 2040 ng·h/g after administration of the CMC- containing 0.45% ketorolac, pH 6.8, and 216 ng/g and 699 ng·h/g after administration of the 0.4% ketorolac, pH 7.4. PK simulations predicted an AUC0–τ of 2910 ng·h/g for twice daily, CMC-containing 0.45% ketorolac, pH 6.8, compared to 725 ng·h/g for 4 times daily, 0.4% ketorolac, pH 7.4.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Replication Is the Target for the Antibacterial Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers: part A Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 1-1-2014 DNA replication is the target for the antibacterial effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Zhou Yin University of Wollongong, [email protected] Yao Wang University of Wollongong, [email protected] Louise Whittell University of Wollongong, [email protected] Slobodan Jergic University of Wollongong, [email protected] Michael Liu University of Technology Sydney See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Yin, Zhou; Wang, Yao; Whittell, Louise; Jergic, Slobodan; Liu, Michael; Harry, Elizabeth J.; Dixon, Nicholas; Kelso, Michael; Beck, Jennifer; and Oakley, Aaron, "DNA replication is the target for the antibacterial effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs" (2014). Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health - Papers: part A. 1685. https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/1685 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] DNA replication is the target for the antibacterial effects of nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drugs Abstract Evidence suggests that some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) possess antibacterial properties with an unknown mechanism. We describe the in vitro antibacterial properties of the NSAIDs carprofen, bromfenac, and vedaprofen, and show that these NSAIDs inhibit the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III β subunit, an essential interaction hub that acts as a mobile tether on DNA for many essential partner proteins in DNA replication and repair.
    [Show full text]
  • A Randomized Double-Masked Study to Compare the Ocular Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Bromfenac 0.075% Compared with Vehicle in Cataract Surgery Subjects
    Journal name: Clinical Ophthalmology Article Designation: Original Research Year: 2016 Volume: 10 Clinical Ophthalmology Dovepress Running head verso: Hosseini et al Running head recto: Bromfenac 0.075% in DuraSite open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S120428 Open Access Full Text Article ORIGINAL RESEARCH A randomized double-masked study to compare the ocular safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bromfenac 0.075% compared with vehicle in cataract surgery subjects Kamran Hosseini1 Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a Thomas Walters2 low-dose version of bromfenac 0.075% in DuraSite® (bromfenac 0.075%) compared with Robert DaVanzo3 DuraSite® vehicle (vehicle) alone for the treatment of postoperative inflammation and ocular Richard L Lindstrom4 pain after cataract surgery. Methods: A multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial of 1InSite Vision Inc., Alameda, CA, 2Texan Eye, Austin, TX, 3Cornerstone Health 240 subjects randomized in a 2:1 ratio to bromfenac 0.075% or vehicle was conducted. Subjects Care, High Point, NC, 4Minnesota Eye were dosed BID beginning 1 day before the cataract surgery, the day of surgery, and 14 days For personal use only. Consultants, Bloomington, MN, USA after surgery. A slit lamp biomicroscopy examination was performed to evaluate the signs of inflammation, including anterior chamber cells (ACC) and anterior chamber flare (ACF). The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of subjects with an ACC grade of 0 at Day 15. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the proportion of subjects who achieved a pain score of 0 at each postsurgical visual analog scale (VAS) assessment and the proportion of subjects with an ACF grade of 0 at Day 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Bromfenac Eye Drops 0.09% COMPOSITION DESCRIPTION
    Bromfenac Eye Drops 0.09% COMPOSITION Each mL contains: Bromfenac Sodium equivalent to Bromfenac 0.09% Benzalkonium chloride Solution IP 0.01% w/v (As preservative) Aqueous Buffered Vehicle q.s. DESCRIPTION OCUBRO (Bromfenac) Eye Drops 0.09% is a sterile, topical, nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drug (NSAID) for ophthalmic use. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Mechanism of Action Prostaglandins have been shown in many animal models to be mediators of certain kinds of intraocular inflammation. In studies performed in animal eyes, prostaglandins have been shown to produce disruption of the blood-aqueous humor barrier; cause vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, leukocytosis, and increased intraocular pressure. Bromfenac has analgesic and anti- inflammatory activity. The mechanism of its action is thought to be due to its ability to block prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting cyclooxygenase 1 and 2. Pharmacokinetics The plasma concentration of bromfenac following ocular administration of 0.09% Bromfenac Eye Drops in humans is unknown. Based on the maximum proposed dose of one drop to each eye (0.09mg) and PK information from other routes of administration, the systemic concentration of bromfenac is estimated to be below the limit of quantification (50 ng/mL) at steady-state in humans. Studies with Bromfenac Eye Drops in both animals and humans have demonstrated that the drug penetrates rapidly and extensively into all ocular tissues after ophthalmic application. Two animal studies have demonstrated that Bromfenac rapidly achieves measurable levels in all major ocular tissues and that detectable levels are sustained over 24 hours. According to one human study, Bromfenac Eye Drops undergoes rapid absorption (within 15 mins), achieves peak aqueous humor concentration of Bromfenac at 150 to 180 minutes after instillation and remains at therapeutic concentrations in the aqueous humor for at least 12 hours.
    [Show full text]