Chapter 6 the Arbelos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 6 the Arbelos Chapter 6 The arbelos 6.1 Archimedes’ theorems on the arbelos Theorem 6.1 (Archimedes 1). The two circles touching CP on different sides and AC CB each touching two of the semicircles have equal diameters AB· . P W1 W2 A O1 O C O2 B A O1 O C O2 B Theorem 6.2 (Archimedes 2). The diameter of the circle tangent to all three semi- circles is AC CB AB · · . AC2 + AC CB + CB2 · We shall consider Theorem ?? in ?? later, and for now examine Archimedes’ wonderful proofs of the more remarkable§ Theorems 6.1 and 6.2. By synthetic reasoning, he computed the radii of these circles. 1Book of Lemmas, Proposition 5. 2Book of Lemmas, Proposition 6. 602 The arbelos 6.1.1 Archimedes’ proof of the twin circles theorem In the beginning of the Book of Lemmas, Archimedes has established a basic proposition 3 on parallel diameters of two tangent circles. If two circles are tangent to each other (internally or externally) at a point P , and if AB, XY are two parallel diameters of the circles, then the lines AX and BY intersect at P . D F I W1 E H W2 G A O C B Figure 6.1: Consider the circle tangent to CP at E, and to the semicircle on AC at G, to that on AB at F . If EH is the diameter through E, then AH and BE intersect at F . Also, AE and CH intersect at G. Let I be the intersection of AE with the outer semicircle. Extend AF and BI to intersect at D. Now in triangle ABD, AI and BF are two altitudes intersecting at E. It follows that E is the orthocenter of the triangle, and ED, being perpendicular to AB, passes through the point D. Therefore, HE : AC = HD : AD (HE//AC) = CB : AB (CG//BI). AC CB This gives HE = AB· . The symmetry of this expression indicates that the same reasoning would show that this is also the diameter of the circle touching CP and the semicircles (AB) and (CB). Hence, the two circles are congruent. We call these Archimedes’ twin circles. 3Proposition 1. 6.1 Archimedes’ theorems on the arbelos 603 6.1.2 Archimedes’ calculation of the radius of the incircle of the arbelos Since AE and CI are altitudes of triangle ACG, their intersection L is the ortho- center of the triangle. Therefore, GL is perpendicular to the base AB. Similarly, HM is also perpendicular to the base AB. D G I H E F K L M A N C P B Figure 6.2: It follows that AN : NP = AL : LH (LN//HP ) = AC : CB (IC//DB) = GM : MB (AG//CM) = NP : P B (GN//MP ). Archimedes noted that this is enough to calculate the diameter of the incircle. Although he illustrated this with AC : CB =3:2, his calculation clearly can be extended to the general case. Since AN + NP + P B = AB and AN : NP : P B = AC2 : AC CB : CB2, · it follows that AC CB NP = · AB. AC2 + AC CB + CB2 · · This is the diameter of the incircle. 604 The arbelos 6.1.3 Constructions of Archimedes’ twin circles 4 Proposition 6.1. Let G be the point of tangency of the Archimedean circle (W1) with the semicircle (AC). (a) The tangent to (AC) at G passes through B. (b) If (W1) touches CP at E, then CW = WE, where W is the intersection of BG and CP . (c) BG = BP . Construction 6.1. Let G be the intersection of the semicircle (AC) with the circle B(P ). Join B, G to intersect CP at W . Construct the circle W (C) to intersect CP again at E. Construct the perpendicular to CP at E, to intersect the line O1G at W1. The circle W1(G) is tangent to the semicircles (AC) and (AB), and also to the line CP . P W1 E G W A O1 K O C B Figure 6.3: Remarks. (1) G can also be constructed as the intersection of the semicircles (O1B) and (AC). (2) The center W1 can also be obtained as the intersection of the bisector of angle GW P and the line O1G. 4Bankoff’s statement 13. 6.2 Archimedes’ twin circles 605 6.2 Archimedes’ twin circles Theorem 6.3 (Archimedes). The two circles each tangent to CP , the largest semi- circle AB and one of the smaller semicircles have equal radii t, given by ab t = . a + b Q A O1 O P O2 B A O1 O P O2 B Proof. Consider the circle tangent to the semicircles O(a+b), O1(a), and the line P Q. Denote by t the radius of this circle. Calculating in two ways the height of the center of this circle above the line AB, we have (a + b t)2 (a b t)2 =(a + t)2 (a t)2. − − − − − − From this, ab t = . a + b The symmetry of this expression in a and b means that the circle tangent to O(a + b), O2(b), and P Q has the same radius t. 606 The arbelos 1 1 1 6.2.1 Harmonic mean and the equation a + b = t 2ab The harmonic mean of two quantities a and b is a+b . In a trapezoid of parallel sides a and b, the parallel through the intersection of the diagonals intercepts a segment whose length is the harmonic mean of a and b. See Figure 8A. We shall 1 1 1 write this harmonic mean as 2t, so that a + b = t . See Figure 8B. D a C b a t A b B (c) Figure 8A (d) Figure 8B Here is another construction of t, making use of the formula for the length of an angle bisector in a triangle. If BC = a, AC = b, then the angle bisector CZ has length 2ab C A t = cos = 2t cos . c a + b 2 2 The length t can therefore be constructed by completing the rhombus CXZY (by constructing the perpendicular bisector of CZ to intersect BC at X and AC at Y ). See Figure 9A. In particular, if the triangle contains a right angle, this trapezoid is a square. See Figure 9B. C X t Y b M t t t A Z B a (e) Figure 9A (f) Figure 9B 6.2 Archimedes’ twin circles 607 Construction 6.2. Construct the circle P (C3) to intersect the diameter AB at P1 and P2 so that P1 is on AP and P2 is on P B. The center C1 respectively C2 is the intersection of the circle O1(P2) respec- tively O2(P1) and the perpendicular to AB at P1 respectively P2. Q C1 Q1 C2 Q2 C3 A O1 P1 O P P2 O2 B Figure 6.9: 608 The arbelos 6.3 The incircle Theorem 6.4 (Archimedes). The incircle of the arbelos has radius r1r2(r1 + r2) ρ = 2 2 . r1 + r1r2 + r2 X Y θ A O1 O C O2 B Proof. Let ∠COO2 = θ. By the law of cosines, we have (r + ρ)2 =(r + r ρ)2 + r2 + 2r (r + r ρ) cos θ, 1 1 2 − 2 2 1 2 − (r + ρ)2 =(r + r ρ)2 + r2 2r (r + r ρ) cos θ. 2 1 2 − 1 − 1 1 2 − Eliminating θ, we have r (r + ρ)2 + r (r + ρ)2 =(r + r )(r + r ρ)2 + r r2 + r r2. 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 − 1 2 2 1 The coefficients of ρ2 on both sides are clearly the same. This is a linear equation in ρ: r3 + r3 + 2(r2 + r2)ρ =(r + r )3 + r r (r + r ) 2(r + r )2ρ, 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 − 1 2 from which 4(r2 + r r + r2)ρ =(r + r )3 + r r (r + r ) (r3 + r3) = 4r r (r + r ), 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 − 1 2 1 2 1 2 and ρ is as above. 6.3 The incircle 609 6.3.1 Construction of the incircle of the arbelos In [?], Bankoff published the following remarkable theorem which gives a con- struction of the incircle of the arbelos of the incircle, much simpler than the one we designed before from Archimedes’ proof. The simplicity of the construction is due to the existence of a circle congruent to Archimedes’ twin circles. Theorem 6.5 (Bankoff). The points of tangency of the incircle of the arbelos with the semicircles (AC) and (CB), together with C, are the points of tangency of the incircle (W3) of triangle O1O2O3 with the sides of the triangle. This circle (W3) is congruent to Archimedes’ twin circles (W1) and (W2). P O3 Q R W3 A O1 O C O2 B Proof. Since O1Q = O1C, O2C = O2R, and O3R = O3Q, the points C, Q, R are the points of tangency of the incircle of triangle O1O2O3 with its sides. The semi-perimeter of the triangle is 3 2 r1r2(r1 + r2) (r1 + r2) (r1 + r2) ρ s = r1 + r2 + ρ = r1 + r2 + 2 2 = 2 2 = . r1 + r2r2 + r2 r1 + r2r2 + r2 r1r2 The inradius of the triangle is the square root of 2 2 r1r2ρ r1r2 2 = 2 = t . s (r1 + r2) It follows that this inradius is t. The incircle of triangle O1O2O3 is congruent to Archimedes’ twin circles. 610 The arbelos Construction 6.3. Let M and N be the midpoints of the semicircles (AC) and (CB) respectively.
Recommended publications
  • Centroids by Composite Areas.Pptx
    Centroids Method of Composite Areas A small boy swallowed some coins and was taken to a hospital. When his grandmother telephoned to ask how he was a nurse said 'No change yet'. Centroids ¢ Previously, we developed a general formulation for finding the centroid for a series of n areas n xA ∑ ii i=1 x = n A ∑ i i=1 2 Centroids by Composite Areas Monday, November 12, 2012 1 Centroids ¢ xi was the distance from the y-axis to the local centroid of the area Ai n xA ∑ ii i=1 x = n A ∑ i i=1 3 Centroids by Composite Areas Monday, November 12, 2012 Centroids ¢ If we can break up a shape into a series of smaller shapes that have predefined local centroid locations, we can use this formula to locate the centroid of the composite shape n xA ∑ ii i=1 x = n A ∑ i 4 Centroids by Composite Areas i=1 Monday, November 12, 2012 2 Centroid by Composite Bodies ¢ There is a table in the back cover of your book that gives you the location of local centroids for a select group of shapes ¢ The point labeled C is the location of the centroid of that shape. 5 Centroids by Composite Areas Monday, November 12, 2012 Centroid by Composite Bodies ¢ Please note that these are local centroids, they are given in reference to the x and y axes as shown in the table. 6 Centroids by Composite Areas Monday, November 12, 2012 3 Centroid by Composite Bodies ¢ For example, the centroid location of the semicircular area has the y-axis through the center of the area and the x-axis at the bottom of the area ¢ The x-centroid would be located at 0 and the y-centroid would be located
    [Show full text]
  • The Arbelos in Wasan Geometry: Chiba's Problem
    Global Journal of Advanced Research on Classical and Modern Geometries ISSN: 2284-5569, Vol.8, (2019), Issue 2, pp.98-104 THE ARBELOS IN WASAN GEOMETRY: CHIBA’S PROBLEM HIROSHI OKUMURA Abstract. We consider a sangaku problem involving an arbelos with two congruent circles, and give several conditions where the two congruent circles appear. Also we show several pairs of congruent circles and Archimedean circles. 2010 Mathematical Subject Classification: 01A27, 51M04, 51N20. Keywords and phrases: arbelos, Archimedean circle, non-Archimedean congruent circles. 1. INTRODUCTION We consider the arbelos appeared in Wasan geometry, and consider an arbelos formed by three semicircles α, β and γ with diameters AO , BO and AB , respectively for a point O on the segment AB . The radii of α and β are denoted by a and b, respectively. We consider the following sangaku .(in 1880 [5] (see Figure 1 (نproblem proposed by Chiba ( ઍ༿ӫ࣏҆ δ ε γ α h β B O H A Figure 1. Problem 1. For a point H on the segment AO, let h be the perpendicular to AB at H. Let δ be the circle touching α and β externally and h, and let ε be the incircle of the curvilinear triangle made by α, γ and h. If δ and ε touch and δ is congruent to the circle of diameter AH, find the radius of ε in terms of a and b. Circles of radius rA = ab /(a + b) are said to be Archimedean. In this paper we generalize the problem and consider two circles touching at a point on a perpendicular to the line AB .
    [Show full text]
  • Archimedes and the Arbelos1 Bobby Hanson October 17, 2007
    Archimedes and the Arbelos1 Bobby Hanson October 17, 2007 The mathematician’s patterns, like the painter’s or the poet’s must be beautiful; the ideas like the colours or the words, must fit together in a harmonious way. Beauty is the first test: there is no permanent place in the world for ugly mathematics. — G.H. Hardy, A Mathematician’s Apology ACBr 1 − r Figure 1. The Arbelos Problem 1. We will warm up on an easy problem: Show that traveling from A to B along the big semicircle is the same distance as traveling from A to B by way of C along the two smaller semicircles. Proof. The arc from A to C has length πr/2. The arc from C to B has length π(1 − r)/2. The arc from A to B has length π/2. ˜ 1My notes are shamelessly stolen from notes by Tom Rike, of the Berkeley Math Circle available at http://mathcircle.berkeley.edu/BMC6/ps0506/ArbelosBMC.pdf . 1 2 If we draw the line tangent to the two smaller semicircles, it must be perpendicular to AB. (Why?) We will let D be the point where this line intersects the largest of the semicircles; X and Y will indicate the points of intersection with the line segments AD and BD with the two smaller semicircles respectively (see Figure 2). Finally, let P be the point where XY and CD intersect. D X P Y ACBr 1 − r Figure 2 Problem 2. Now show that XY and CD are the same length, and that they bisect each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 20: Composite Area Problems
    NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM Lesson 20 7•3 Lesson 20: Composite Area Problems Student Outcomes . Students find the area of regions in the coordinate plane with polygonal boundaries by decomposing the plane into triangles and quadrilaterals, including regions with polygonal holes. Students find composite areas of regions in the coordinate plane by decomposing the plane into familiar figures (triangles, quadrilaterals, circles, semicircles, and quarter circles). Lesson Notes In Lessons 17 through 20, students learned to find the areas of various regions, including quadrilaterals, triangles, circles, semicircles, and those plotted on coordinate planes. In this lesson, students use prior knowledge to use the sum and/or difference of the areas to find unknown composite areas. Classwork Example 1 (5 minutes) Scaffolding: For struggling students, display Example 1 posters around the room displaying the visuals and the Find the composite area of the shaded region. Use ퟑ. ퟏퟒ for 흅. formulas of the area of a circle, a triangle, and a quadrilateral for reference. Allow students to look at the problem and find the area independently before solving as a class. What information can we take from the image? Two circles are on the coordinate plane. The diameter of the larger circle is 6 units, and the diameter of MP.1 the smaller circle is 4 units. How do we know what the diameters of the circles are? We can count the units along the diameter of the circles, or we can subtract the coordinate points to find the length of the diameter. Lesson 20: Composite Area Problems 283 This work is derived from Eureka Math ™ and licensed by Great Minds.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions Manual to Accompany Classical Geometry
    Solutions Manual to Accompany Classical Geometry Solutions Manual to Accompany CLASSICAL GEOMETRY Euclidean, Transformational, Inversive, and Projective I. E. Leonard J. E. Lewis A. C. F. Liu G. W. Tokarsky Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton, Canada WILEY Copyright © 2014 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection
    Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection For other titles published in this series, go to http://www.springer.com/series/4142 Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences Managing Editor J.Z. Buchwald Associate Editors J.L. Berggren and J. Lützen Advisory Board C. Fraser, T. Sauer, A. Shapiro Pappus of Alexandria: Book 4 of the Collection Edited With Translation and Commentary by Heike Sefrin-Weis Heike Sefrin-Weis Department of Philosophy University of South Carolina Columbia SC USA [email protected] Sources Managing Editor: Jed Z. Buchwald California Institute of Technology Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences MC 101–40 Pasadena, CA 91125 USA Associate Editors: J.L. Berggren Jesper Lützen Simon Fraser University University of Copenhagen Department of Mathematics Institute of Mathematics University Drive 8888 Universitetsparken 5 V5A 1S6 Burnaby, BC 2100 Koebenhaven Canada Denmark ISBN 978-1-84996-004-5 e-ISBN 978-1-84996-005-2 DOI 10.1007/978-1-84996-005-2 Springer London Dordrecht Heidelberg New York British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Control Number: 2009942260 Mathematics Classification Number (2010) 00A05, 00A30, 03A05, 01A05, 01A20, 01A85, 03-03, 51-03 and 97-03 © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Division by Zero Calculus Vol. 1 (January-December, 2021)
    International Journal of Division by Zero Calculus Vol. 1 (January-December, 2021) GEOMETRY AND DIVISION BY ZERO CALCULUS HIROSHI OKUMURA Abstract. We demonstrate several results in plane geometry derived from division by zero and division by zero calculus. The results show that the two new concepts open an entirely new world of mathematics. 1. Introduction The lack of division by zero has been a serious glaring omission in our mathe- matics. While recent publications [3], [7], [8], [22], [29] have offered a final solution to this [3]: z = 0 for any element z in a field: (1.1) 0 In this article we show several results in plane geometry obtained from division by zero given by (1.1) and division by zero calculus, which is a generalization of division by zero. For a meromorphic function W = f(z), we consider the Laurent expansion of f around z = a: nX=−1 X1 n n W = f(z) = Cn(z − a) + C0 + Cn(z − a) : n=−∞ n=1 Then we define f(a) = C0. This is a generalization of (1.1) called division by zero calculus [29]. Now we can consider the value f(a) = C0 at an isolated singular point a. We consider some families of circles in the plane, each of the members is rep- resented by a Cartesian equation fz(x; y) = 0 with parameter z 2 R. Here, we assume that if x and y are fixed, fz(x; y) is a meromorphic function in z. Then, for the Laurent expansion of the function fz(x; y) at z = a for fixed x; y, the corresponding coefficient Cn(a; x; y) is depending on also x and y.
    [Show full text]
  • REFLECTIONS on the ARBELOS Written in Block Capitals
    REFLECTIONS ON THE ARBELOS HAROLD P. BOAS Written in block capitals on lined paper, the letter bore a postmark from a Northeastern seaport. \I have a problem that I would like to solve," the letter began, \but unfortunately I cannot. I dropped out from 2nd year high school, and this problem is too tough for me." There followed the diagram shown in Figure 1 along with the statement of the problem: to prove that the line segment DE has the same length as the line segment AB. Figure 1. A correspondent's hand-drawn puzzle \I tried this and went even to the library for information about mathematics," the letter continued, \but I have not succeeded. Would you be so kind to give me a full explanation?" Mindful of the romantic story [18] of G. H. Hardy's discovery of the Indian genius Ramanujan, a mathematician who receives such a letter wants ¯rst to rule out the remote possibility that the writer is some great unknown talent. Next, the question arises of whether the correspondent falls into the category of eccentrics whom Underwood Dudley terms mathematical cranks [14], for one ought not to encourage cranks. Date: October 26, 2004. This article is based on a lecture delivered at the nineteenth annual Rose-Hulman Undergraduate Mathematics Conference, March 15, 2002. 1 2 HAROLD P. BOAS Since this letter claimed no great discovery, but rather asked politely for help, I judged it to come from an enthusiastic mathematical am- ateur. Rather than ¯le such letters in the oubliette, or fob them o® on junior colleagues, I try to reply in a friendly way to communica- tions from coherent amateurs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pythagorean Theorem Crown Jewel of Mathematics
    The Pythagorean Theorem Crown Jewel of Mathematics 5 3 4 John C. Sparks The Pythagorean Theorem Crown Jewel of Mathematics By John C. Sparks The Pythagorean Theorem Crown Jewel of Mathematics Copyright © 2008 John C. Sparks All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form—except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review—without permission in writing from the author or publisher. Front cover, Pythagorean Dreams, a composite mosaic of historical Pythagorean proofs. Back cover photo by Curtis Sparks ISBN: XXXXXXXXX First Published by Author House XXXXX Library of Congress Control Number XXXXXXXX Published by AuthorHouse 1663 Liberty Drive, Suite 200 Bloomington, Indiana 47403 (800)839-8640 www.authorhouse.com Produced by Sparrow-Hawke †reasures Xenia, Ohio 45385 Printed in the United States of America 2 Dedication I would like to dedicate The Pythagorean Theorem to: Carolyn Sparks, my wife, best friend, and life partner for 40 years; our two grown sons, Robert and Curtis; My father, Roscoe C. Sparks (1910-1994). From Earth with Love Do you remember, as do I, When Neil walked, as so did we, On a calm and sun-lit sea One July, Tranquillity, Filled with dreams and futures? For in that month of long ago, Lofty visions raptured all Moonstruck with that starry call From life beyond this earthen ball... Not wedded to its surface. But marriage is of dust to dust Where seasoned limbs reclaim the ground Though passing thoughts still fly around Supernal realms never found On the planet of our birth. And I, a man, love you true, Love as God had made it so, Not angel rust when then aglow, But coupled here, now rib to soul, Dear Carolyn of mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Icons of Mathematics an EXPLORATION of TWENTY KEY IMAGES Claudi Alsina and Roger B
    AMS / MAA DOLCIANI MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITIONS VOL 45 Icons of Mathematics AN EXPLORATION OF TWENTY KEY IMAGES Claudi Alsina and Roger B. Nelsen i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page i — #1 i i 10.1090/dol/045 Icons of Mathematics An Exploration of Twenty Key Images i i i i i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page ii — #2 i i c 2011 by The Mathematical Association of America (Incorporated) Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 2011923441 Print ISBN 978-0-88385-352-8 Electronic ISBN 978-0-88385-986-5 Printed in the United States of America Current Printing (last digit): 10987654321 i i i i i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page iii — #3 i i The Dolciani Mathematical Expositions NUMBER FORTY-FIVE Icons of Mathematics An Exploration of Twenty Key Images Claudi Alsina Universitat Politecnica` de Catalunya Roger B. Nelsen Lewis & Clark College Published and Distributed by The Mathematical Association of America i i i i i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page iv — #4 i i DOLCIANI MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITIONS Committee on Books Frank Farris, Chair Dolciani Mathematical Expositions Editorial Board Underwood Dudley, Editor Jeremy S. Case Rosalie A. Dance Tevian Dray Thomas M. Halverson Patricia B. Humphrey Michael J. McAsey Michael J. Mossinghoff Jonathan Rogness Thomas Q. Sibley i i i i i i “MABK018-FM” — 2011/5/16 — 19:53 — page v — #5 i i The DOLCIANI MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITIONS series of the Mathematical As- sociation of America was established through a generous gift to the Association from Mary P.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensionalism: the Revolution in Logic
    Nimrod Bar-Am Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic Bar-Am_Fm.indd iii 1/22/2008 10:19:09 PM N. Bar-Am Head, Rhetoric and Philosophy of Communication Unit Communication Department Sapir College of the Negev M.P. Hof Ashkelon 79165 Israel ISBN: 978-1-4020-8167-5 e-ISBN: 978-1-4020-8168-2 DOI: 10.1007/ 978-1-4020-8168-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007941591 All Rights Reserved © 2008 Springer Science + Business Media, B.V. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springer.com Bar-Am_Fm.indd iv 1/22/2008 10:19:09 PM Motto: “… logic … since Aristotle … has been unable to advance a step, and, thus, to all appearances has reached its completion” Immanuel Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason Preface to the 2nd ed., 1787 “Pure mathematics was discovered by Boole … the fact being that Boole was too modest to suppose his book the first ever written on mathematics.… His book was in fact concerned with formal logic, and this is the same thing as mathematics” Bertrand Russell Recent Work in the Philosophy of Mathematics, 1901 Bar-Am_Fm.indd vii 1/22/2008 10:19:09 PM Abstract For a very long time, Aristotelian logic was accepted as a tool (Organon) for the generation of scientific theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Centroids Introduction • the Earth Exerts a Gravitational Force on Each of the Particles Forming a Body
    Centroids Introduction • The earth exerts a gravitational force on each of the particles forming a body. These forces can be replace by a single equivalent force equal to the weight of the body and applied at the center of gravity for the body. • The centroid of an area is analogous to the center of gravity of a body. The concept of the first moment of an area is used to locate the centroid. 5 - 2 Centroids • Centroid of mass – (a.k.a. Center of mass) – (a.k.a. Center of weight) – (a.k.a. Center of gravity) • For a solid, the point where the distributed mass is centered • Centroid of volume, Centroid of area xM xm x dm yM ym y dm Center of Gravity of a 2D Body • Center of gravity of a plate • Center of gravity of a wire M y xW xW x dW M y yW yW y dW 5 - 7 Centroids &First Moments of Areas & Lines • Centroid of an area • Centroid of a line xW x dW xgM g x dM xW x dW M V tA) dM dV tdA x La x adL xAt x tdA xL x dL xA x dA Q y yL y dL first moment with respect to y yA y dA Q x first moment with respect to x 5 - 8 First Moments of Areas and Lines • An area is symmetric with respect to an axis BB’ if for every point P there exists a point P’ such that PP’ is perpendicular to BB’ and is divided into two equal parts by BB’.
    [Show full text]