DOCSLIB.ORG

Foraging Strategies and Resource Partitioning of Desert Harvester Ants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foraging Strategies and Resource Partitioning of Desert Harvester Ants Foraging strategies and resource partitioning of desert harvester ants Ali Brunschwiler1, Amelia Maurer2, John Parsons3, Sage Radecki2, Joe Scullin4, Selena Vengco2 1University of California, Davis, 2University of California, Santa Cruz, 3University of California, Santa Barbara, 4University of California, San Diego ABSTRACT Resource limitations force desert species to forage efficiently and partition resources. Ant species have different foraging strategies, which may act as a method of niche partitioning. We aimed to measure differences in foraging behavior between colonies of Messor and Pogonomyrmex. Using an experimental treatment of seeds, we measured collection rate and resource preference between high and low density resources between the two species. We found significant differences in multiple aspects of foraging behavior, including overall abundance of seeds collected, proportion of different resources collected, and the effect of time on resource preference. These differences suggest a mechanism for resource partitioning between Messor and Pogonomyrmex. Additionally, the role of these two species in seed dispersal may be influenced by their foraging strategies. INTRODUCTION competition by partitioning resources (Hutchinson 1978, Begon et. al 1986, Deserts are among the most Ricklefs 1990). abiotically stressful ecosystems due to Sedentary ants form colonies in fixed low rates of precipitation and extreme locations and rarely move, limiting their temperatures. As a result, natural foraging abilities to a small area just selection has favored species that adapt around their nest. Since limiting to these extreme conditions by resources may impose strong selective optimizing energy efficiency (Davidson pressures in deserts, foraging behavior 1977). Optimal foraging theory predicts and behavioral cohesion of a colony that animals will maximize the amount may reflect their effort to maximize the of energy gained when foraging while difference between resources gained minimizing the amount of time and and energy lost while foraging energy lost. Additionally, species with (Bernstein 1975). In areas of higher similar niche requirements can reduce abundance, sedentary ants have been energy losses associated with observed utilizing a solitary foraging CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3R36F Fall 2017 1/6 strategy where scouts leave the nest in can coexist they must be able to a certain direction until food is found. resource partition through foraging Once the food is returned to the nest, strategy. Our research allowed us to the ant will return directly to the place assess the resource dispersion where it last found food and begin preference of both Messor and searching for more food. This limits Pogonomyrmex. competition between foragers of the same colony, and maximizes the total METHODS surface area covered by a single colony 2.1 Study Area while foraging. In areas where resources are scarce, sedentary ants are typically We conducted our study at the observed utilizing a group foraging Sweeney Granite Mountains Desert strategy where scouts forage in Research Center in the Mojave Desert of different directions and recruit more California (34.7813° N, 115.6538° W). foragers once a food source is found. The reserve hosts a wide number of This maximizes their gathering potential granivorous ant species, and is in areas of scarce resources by putting composed of mixed cactus and yucca the colony’s efforts towards high scrub habitats. We observed ant density food resources. colonies located at Norris Camp and Two common ants found in arid Cottonwood Basin, locations that were regions of the southwestern United similar in habitat and abiotic conditions States are Messor sp. and including temperature and vegetative Pogonomyrmex sp. (both hereafter features. Our sample sites were at least referred to by Messor and 5 m apart to avoid inter-colony Pogonomyrmex, respectively). Both interactions, and we only surveyed genera are harvester ants although actively foraging colonies. We Messor tends to utilize the group considered a colony to be active if there foraging strategy while Pogonomyrmex were more than 10 ants outside a radius generally uses the solitary foraging of 0.5 m from the colony. We surveyed strategy (Rissing and Pollock 1984). In 12 Pogonomyrmex and 11 Messor order to quantify the differences colonies, 23 in total. between these two foraging techniques 2.2 Sampling Design we examined ant responses to high We conducted our field sampling over density (clumped) food sources vs. low the course of five days, November 4–8, density (dispersed) food sources. 2017. At each colony, we baited ants In our study, we examined how these with 8 g of bulgur seeds. Our two two ant genera utilized high vs. low treatments included seeds set out at density resources. By laying out equal high (clumped) and low (dispersed) quantities of clumped and dispersed densities. For the high density seeds, we were able to compare seed treatments, we set out four 1.0 gram intake and proportion of each resource clumps of seeds 4 cm in diameter and type collected between the two species 0.5 meters from the colony entrance at over time. If Messor and Pogonomyrmex CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3R36F Fall 2017 2/6 each of the four cardinal directions. For We excluded the last fifteen minutes the low density (dispersed) treatments, of our observation period, because we we sprinkled 4.0 g of seeds evenly observed that the number of seeds collected per interval began to decline after 45 minutes, indicating that seed resources may have been exhausted. Thus, seeds may have been collected based on availability rather than preference. To test for differences in handling time between species we used a two- tailed t-test. We defined handling time as the time between an ant first picking Figure 1. Experimental layout. Large red circles up and first returning a seed to the represent 1.0 g clumped seed treatments and colony. We did not distinguish between blue dotted line represents 4.0 g of seeds evenly clumped and dispersed resources for dispersed 0.5 m from colony entrance. handling time. In order to determine if there were differences in the number of around the colony entrance at a 0.5 m total seeds collected by species per five radius (Figure 1). In order to minute time interval, we performed a differentiate between clumped and two-tailed t-test. A two-tailed t-test was dispersed seeds in the field, we dyed also used to test for differences in the seeds in different treatments different proportion of clumped resources that TM colors using food coloring (Watkins each species collected over the whole Assorted Food Coloring). One color of time period. We used a ANCOVA testing seeds was used for the four high density the effects of ant genus on proportion clumps, and a different color for the of clumped seeds taken with time dispersed arcs. To avoid potentially interval as a covariate. confounding effects of different colors of dye on experimental treatments, we RESULTS randomized colors of clumped and We found no significant difference in dispersed seeds each sampling day. handling time between species (n = 207, At each colony we observed ant p = 0.467). On average, Messor activity for 60 minutes, beginning when collected significantly more seeds per all seeds were set out. We divided the five minute time interval than observation period into five minute Pogonomyrmex (n = 207, p < 0.0001). intervals to observe changes in seed Messor collected over twice as many collection over time. We recorded the seeds per interval than Pogonomyrmex color of every bulgur seed carried into (Figure 2). Additionally, 31.3% of the the colony in order to distinguish which seeds that Messor collected were from treatment the ant collected it from. clumped resources, whereas 2.3 Statistical Analysis Pogonomyrmex collected 21.6% from clumped resources (n = 207, p < 0.0134 ; CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3R36F Fall 2017 3/6 Figure 4). The proportion of clumped seeds taken by ants increased significantly over time (n = 207, p < 0.003; Figure 4). Additionally, there was Figure 4. Proportion of clumped resources per time interval per species. Black line represents Messor, red line represents Pogonomyrmex. a marginally significant interaction between the effects of species and time on proportion clumped seeds collected Figure 2. Total seeds per time interval by (n = 207, p < 0.056 ; Figure 4). Over species. Mean number of seeds collected per time, the proportion of clumped seeds interval ± se between ant species. taken by Messor increased by a 4% per interval, while the proportion taken by Pogonomyrmex did not increase over time. DISCUSSION We determined that Messor and Pogonomyrmex exhibit differences in many aspects of their foraging strategies, including harvesting rate, resource preference, and shifts in foraging behavior over time. Despite the similarity of individual efficiency between these two species, Messor Figure 3. Proportion of clumped resources by colonies as a whole were able to collect ant species. Mean proportion of clumped resources. seeds at twice the rate of Pogonomyrmex colonies. This suggests that differentiation between the two species is occurring at the level of the colony, not at the level of the individual forager. Because foraging efficiency does not differ between individuals of Messor and Pogonomyrmex, colony size and activity levels may be driving the CEC Research | https://doi.org/10.21973/N3R36F Fall 2017 4/6 differences in collection rates we in open areas (Nelson and Chew 1977). observed. Messor may be specialized to foraging in Furthermore, Messor colonies focused areas of higher seed density, while a higher proportion of their foraging Pogonomyrmex may be better adapted effort on clumped seeds than to open areas with low seed density due Pogonomyrmex colonies. This suggests to their lower preference for clumped that Messor is better at exploiting high- seeds. This is supported by the fact that density resources than Pogonomyrmex, Messor has a higher elevation range perhaps by use of a group-foraging than Pogonomyrmex and is therefore strategy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of Myrmecochore Species Abundance
    EFFECTS OF MYRMECOCHORE SPECIES ABUNDANCE, DIVERSITY, AND FRUITING PHENOLOGY ON APHAENOGASTER (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) NESTING AND FORAGING IN SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN RICH COVE FORESTS A Thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Western Carolina University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology. By Mary N. Schultz Director: Dr. James T. Costa, Western Carolina University Biology Department Committee Members: Dr. Beverly Collins, Western Carolina University Biology Department Dr. Robert Warren III, State University of New York College at Buffalo Biology Department April, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee members and director for their assistance and support, particularly logistical, conceptual, and editorial guidance from Dr. Beverly Collins; statistical and editorial assistance from Dr. Robert Warren; and keen proofreading and editorial comments from Dr. James T. Costa. I would also like to thank Dr. Mark Bradford, Yale school of Forestry and Environmental Studies, for funding my research. I am eternally grateful to my husband, David Clarke, for his continued unwavering support, in the field and out; none of this would have been possible without him. Lastly, my sincere appreciation for generous counsel and sage advice from my friends, Josh Kelly and Jay Kranyik. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Dispersal by Ants in Jarrah Forest Restorations of Western Australia
    Seed Dispersal by Ants in Jarrah Forest Restorations of Western Australia Troy L. Wanless Introduction The jarrah forests in Western Australia cover approximately 1.75 million ha in the southwestern corner of the state (Figure 1). Jarrah, otherwise known as Eucalyptus marginata, is only one species among many that inhabit a region with considerable physical and biological diversity. 1200 species of plants, 29 mammalian species, 45 reptile species, 17 frog species, 4 fish species and 150 bird species live in this system which also has highly adverse conditions for survival. These may include infertile, often salt-laden soils, drought, and the occasional wildfire (Western Australia Forest Alliance, 2003). Considerable deposits of bauxite, which is the primary material involved in the production of aluminum, are scattered throughout the region. Since 1963, Alcoa of Australia Ltd. has cleared these jarrah forests to make way for mining of this ore. It is estimated that these deposits cover 7-8% of the forested area although only 3-4% will ever be mined due to environmental and economic constraints (Majer, 1989). These mined areas create a scattering of patches throughout the forest that are essentially stripped of any kind of biodiversity that was once there (Figure 2). Restoration efforts on these previously mined patches focus on many aspects of the jarrah forest ecosystem. Specifically interesting is the role that ants play in seed dispersal. This paper will focus on the topic of seed dispersal by ants in the northern jarrah forests of Western Australia while paying particular attention to myrmecochory. Figure 1. Location of jarrah forest in Australia Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants, Plants, and Seed Dispersal Ignorance: How Do Ants Enhance Persistence?
    Ants, Plants, and Seed Dispersal Ignorance: How do Ants Enhance Persistence? Charles Kwit, Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries [email protected] Wednesday, 11 September 2013 12:20 PM, 160 Plant Biotech Building 1 Acknowledgements 2 References Albrecht and McCarthy (2011), Plant Ecology 212: 1465-1477 Berg-Binder and Suarez (2012), Oecologia 169: 763-772 Bond (2001), American Journal of Botany 88: 234-241 Canner et al. (2012), Acta Oecologica 40: 31-39 Christian & Stanton (2004), Ecology 85: 1101-1110 Culver & Beattie (1978), Journal of Ecology 66: 53-72 Garrido et al. (2009), Acta Oecologica 35: 393-399 Gomez et al. (2003), Ecography 26: 532-538 Imbert (2006), Plant Species Biology 21: 109-117 Kwit et al. (2012), American Midland Naturalist 168: 9-17 Leal et al. (2007), Annals of Botany 99: 885-894 Lengyel et al. (2010), Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 12: 43-55 Lobstein & Rockwood (1993), Virginia Journal of Science 44: 59-72 Lopez-Vila & Garcia-Fayos (2005), Acta Oecologica 28: 157-162 Manzaneda & Rey (2012), Ecography 35: 322-332 Martins et al. (2006), Sociobiology 47: 265-274 Ness et al. (2009), Oikos 118: 1793-1804 Ohkawara (2005), Plant Species Biology 20: 145-148 Passos & Ferriera (1996), Biotropica 28: 697-700 Rico-Gray & Oliveira (2007), The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-Plant Interactions Smith et al. (1989), Ecology 70: 1649-1656 Soriano et al. (2012), Plant Biosystems 146: 143-152 Whigham (2004), Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 583-621 3 Outline ✤ Myrmecochory and ant-plant mutualism ✤ Ant “seed treatment” experiment ✤ New natural history information ✤ Ant “seed dispersal” experiment ✤ Future directions 4 Myrmecochory and ant-plant mutualism ✤ Seed dispersal by ants, aided by elaiosome ✤ Common phenomenon found in > 11,000 plant species (Lengyel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • U Tech Glossary
    URGLOSSARY used without permission revised the Ides of March 2014 glos·sa·ry Pronunciation: primarystressglässchwaremacron, -ri also primarystressglodots- Function: noun Inflected Form(s): -es Etymology: Medieval Latin glossarium, from Latin glossa difficult word requiring explanation + -arium -ary : a collection of textual glosses <an edition of Shakespeare with a good glossary> or of terms limited to a special area of knowledge <a glossary of technical terms> or usage <a glossary of dialectal words> Merriam Webster Unabridged tangent, adj. and n. [ad. L. tangens, tangent-em, pr. pple. of tangĕre to touch; used by Th. Fincke, 1583, as n. in sense = L. līnea tangens tangent or touching line. In F. tangent, -e adj., tangente n. (Geom.), Ger. tangente n.] c. In general use, chiefly fig. from b, esp. in phrases (off) at, in, upon a tangent, ie off or away with sudden divergence, from the course or direction previously followed; abruptly from one course of action, subject, thought, etc, to another. (http://dictionary.oed.com) As in off on a tangent. “Practice, repetition, and repetition of the repeated with ever increasing intensity are…the way.” Zen in the Art of Archery by Eugen Herrigel. For many terms, this glossary contains definitions from multiple sources, each with their own nuance, each authors variation emphasized. Reading the repeated definitions, with their slight variations, helps create a fuller, more overall understanding of the meaning of these terms. The etymology of the entries reinforces and may repeat the repetitions. Wax on, wax off. Sand da floor. For sometime, when I encounter a term I don’t understand (and there are very many), I have been looking them up in the oed and copying the definition into a Word document.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Dispersal Mutualisms Are Essential for the Survival of Diverse Plant Species and Communities Worldwide
    ABSTRACT YOUNGSTEADT, ELSA KRISTEN. Neotropical Ant-Gardens: Behavioral and Chemical Ecology of an Obligate Ant-Plant Mutualism. (Under the direction of Coby Schal.) Seed dispersal mutualisms are essential for the survival of diverse plant species and communities worldwide. An outstanding but poorly understood ant-seed mutualism occurs in the Amazonian rainforest, where arboreal ants collect seeds of several taxonomically diverse plant species and cultivate them in nutrient-rich nests, forming abundant hanging gardens known as ant-gardens (AGs). AG ants and plants are dominant members of lowland Amazonian ecosystems, and their interaction is obligate and apparently species-specific. Though established AGs are limited to specific participants, it is unknown at what stage specificity arises. Seed fate pathways in AG epiphytes are undocumented, and the recognition cues that mediate the mutualism are unknown. Here the species specificity of the AG ant-seed interaction is assessed, and chemical cues are characterized that elicit seed- finding and seed-carrying in AG ants. To examine the specificity of the ant-seed interaction, general food baits and seeds of the AG plant Peperomia macrostachya were offered on alternate days at 108 bait stations. Seventy ant species were detected at food baits and could have interacted with AG seeds, but only three species collected P. macrostachya seeds, and 84% of observed seed removal by ants was attributed to C. femoratus. In a separate experiment, arthropod exclusion significantly reduced AG seed removal rates, but vertebrate exclusion did not. Thus species specific seed dispersal, rather than post-dispersal processes, appears to be the primary determinant of the distribution of AG plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Early Flowering in Myrmecochorous Plants an Adaptation for Ant
    Is early flowering in myrmecochorous plants an adaptation for ant dispersal? JAVIER GUITIÁN and JOSÉ L. GARRIDO Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Biología, Campus Sur, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15708, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain Abstract To analyze the extent to which early flowering of specialized myrmecochorous plants (i.e. plants producing elaiosome-bearing seeds) may be the result of adaptation for ant dis- persal, we investigated flowering and fruiting patterns of common herb and shrub-layer species in a beechwood forest at the western end of the Cantabrian Range (Spain). Over the same period, we estimated ant abundance, the availability of alternative foods for ants, and the rate of removal of seeds by ants. Our results indicate: (i) that the flowering peaks of most strict myrmecochores occurred approximately 4 weeks earlier than in non- myrmecochores; (ii) that the fruiting peak of both groups of plants occurred around the same time, in early July; (iii) that the peak in ant abundance coincides with the seed availability peak, and precedes the peak in availability of alternative ant foods; and (iv) that the probability of seed removal by Formica rufibarbis (the only ant species present in the study area) varies over the season, peaking in early July. In conclusion, our results show that despite differences in seed size, plants with ant-dispersed seeds show highly synchronous flowering, suggesting that strict myrmecochores in our study area may have adapted their phenologies to the seasonal availability of dispersers. Keywords: elaiosome, flowering phenology, fruiting phenology, seed removal, seed size, myrmecochory. Introduction outside the nest where it may germinate.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Redispersal Into Myrmecochory: Addressing the Uniqueness of Microsites Near Ant Nests in an Eastern North American Forest
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2015 Incorporating redispersal into myrmecochory: Addressing the uniqueness of microsites near ant nests in an eastern North American forest Kent Connell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Connell, Kent, "Incorporating redispersal into myrmecochory: Addressing the uniqueness of microsites near ant nests in an eastern North American forest" (2015). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1816 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Title: Incorporating redispersal into myrmecochory: Addressing the uniqueness of 2 microsites near ant nests in an eastern North American forest 3 4 Author: R. Kent Connell 5 Advisor: Charles Kwit 6 7 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 8 TN, USA, 37996-0001 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Author email: 23 [email protected] 24 Abstract 25 While ‘benefits of directed dispersal’ studies in myrmecochorous systems have 26 compared the properties of soils underneath myrmecochores to the soils in the nests of 27 ants that disperse their seeds, none have explored the properties of soils nearby ant 28 nests, where recent work indicates seeds are quickly “redispersed” in eastern North 29 American myrmecochorous systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Pollinators, Seed Dispersers and Belowground Symbionts in the Invasion Success of Acacia
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Do mutualists matter? The role of pollinators, seed dispersers and belowground symbionts in the invasion success of Acacia __________________________________ A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Elizabeth M. Wandrag _______________________________ Lincoln University, New Zealand 2012 Abstract Plant species introduced to new locations may lose their natural enemies but can also leave behind important mutualists. Here, I take a novel comparative approach to identify the potential role of mutualistic interactions in determining invasion outcomes. I examine the strength of pollination, seed dispersal and belowground symbioses with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) across three species that vary in invasion success in both their introduced and native range. I used species of Australian Acacia introduced to New Zealand. I hypothesised that if interactions with mutualists are important for plant invasion then species would vary in the strength of interactions with one or more of the groups of mutualists I examined, and that the pattern of variation would correlate with the degree to which they have established and spread in New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Gesneriad Reference
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIzONS TO BOTANY NUMBER 29 A Study of the Tribe Gesnerieae, with a Revision of Gesneria (Gesneriaceae: Gesnerioideae) Laurence E. Skog SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1976 ABSTRACT Skog, Laurence E. A Study of the Tribe Gesnerieae, with a Revision of Gesneria (Gesneriaceae: Gesnerioideae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, number 29, 182 pages, 86 figures, 9 tables, 1976.-A study is made of the tribe Gesnerieae of the family Gesneriaceae from the West Indies, giving information on history, anatomy and morphology, pollination and dispersal, and hybridization in the tribe. The tribe comprises 67 species in 3 genera: Rhytidophyllztm, Gesneria, and Pheidonocarpa. The last genus is described as new, with a new species com- bination, Pheidonocarpa corymbosa (Swartz) L. Skog, and 2 subspecies. A revi- sion of Gesneria Linnaeus is presented based on field and herbarium studies. Gesneria is divided into 9 sections, 46 species (a new species, Gesneria onycho- calyx L. Skog, is described), 12 subspecies, and 11 varieties. The taxonomic portion includes keys, synonymies, descriptions, typifications, distributions, and ecology, as well as distribution maps and illustrations of the taxa. Also enum- erated in Appendix 1 are many species names once included in Gesnera or Gesneria, but which have been transferred to other genera. Two new combina- tions are made in this portion of the text: Rhytidophyllum cumanense (Han- stein) L. Skog and Rhytidophyllum onacaense (Rusby) L. Skog. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SI PRESSNUMBER 6053. SERIESCOYER DFSIGN: Leaf clearing from the Katsura tree Cercidifihyllum japonicum Siebold and Zuccarini.
    [Show full text]
  • Boydfrde2001.Pdf
    American Journal of Botany 88(2): 234±241. 2001. ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS OF MYRMECOCHORY FOR THE ENDANGERED CHAPARRAL SHRUB FREMONTODENDRON DECUMBENS (STERCULIACEAE)1 ROBERT S. BOYD Department of Biological Sciences and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama 36849-5407 USA Fremontodendron decumbens grows in a single county in central California, USA. Prior research showed that its elaiosome-bearing seeds are dispersed by the harvester ant Messor andrei. I tested several hypotheses regarding the positive role of ant-mediated dispersal to F. decumbens: (1) Does ant-mediated seed dispersal facilitate seed escape from rodent predation?; (2) Does ant processing of seeds stimulate germination?; (3) Are ant middens more suitable microsites for seed or seedling survival in unburned chaparral areas?; and (4) Do survival bene®ts of dispersal occur post-®re in the form of differences in seedling survival probabilities and, if so, why? Results of tests of each hypothesis were: (1) similar percentages of seeds placed on ant middens and under F. decumbens shrub canopies were destroyed by rodents, but seeds from which elaiosomes had been removed were more likely to escape rodent predation; (2) seeds processed by ants did not germinate more readily than seeds removed directly from shrub branches; (3) seedling predation was a major cause of mortality in unburned chaparral on both ant middens and under shrubs, and overall seedling survival did not differ between the two microsites; (4) post-burn seedling survival was signi®cantly greater for seedlings dispersed away from F. decumbens shrub canopies, because dispersed seedlings were both less likely to be killed by predators and more likely to be growing in a gap created by the ®re-caused death of an established shrub.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant Autoecology
    A comparison of the autecology of two seed-taking ant genera, Rhytidoponera and Melophorus Jonathan D Majer Aaron D Gove Stan Sochacki Philip Searle Christopher Portlock Abstract Members of the genus Rhytidoponera and, to a lesser extent, certain Melophorus spp. are keystone mutualists for the dispersal of seeds in the southwest of Western Australia, with important ramifications for the ecology and speciation of plants in this biodiversity hotspot. For this reason, it is important to understand the autecology of the relevant ant species and the way in which they interact with plant seeds. This paper addresses key aspects of the ecology of three such ant species, Rhytidoponera violacea (Forel), R. inornata Crawley and Melophorus turneri perthensis Wheeler. Data are presented on their geographic distribution, seasonality of foraging, diurnal activity, response to fire, nest site preference, nest structure, colony size, feeding habits, foraging response to seed availability, and seedling emergence from nests. The role of all three species as seed dispersers is confirmed, and all three species have ecologies that are well-suited for dispersal and survival of native plant seeds. Preservation of this interaction is important for the conservation of plants, and it is fortuitous that all three species are able to survive disturbance and return to rehabilitated areas. However, the smaller R. inornata, and to a lesser extent, the larger R. violacea, are vulnerable to invasive ant (Pheidole megacephala (Fabricius) incursions. M. turneri perthensis is able to coexist with the invasive ant unless this is at high densities, probably as a result of its ability to forage during high temperatures when the invasive species is inactive.
    [Show full text]
  • “Redirecting” the Study of Mutualistic Benefits to Plants in Myrmecochory
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Faculty Publications and Other Works -- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Fall 2014 “Redirecting” the Study of Mutualistic Benefits oT Plants In Myrmecochory Mariah Taylor Patton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_ecolpubs Recommended Citation Patton, Mariah T. "“Redirecting” the study of mutualistic benefits ot plants in myrmecochory" (2014). University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Other Works -- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Redirecting” the study of mutualistic benefits to plants in myrmecochory By Mariah Patton Mentor: Dr. Charles Kwit 1 Abstract Myrmecochory is typically cast as a mutualistic relationship in which seed dispersal of plants with elaiosome-bearing seeds is performed by ants. Benefits of this mutualism may seem simple at first: ants gain a nutritive reward via elaiosomes, while plant propagules gain protection and a more suitable microsite for establishment and growth. However, there is growing literature suggesting that ants may not consistently receive benefits from elaiosome-based diets, and studies depicting plant benefits are constrained by the “ideal” model framework, by temporal limitations, and by limitations of sources of mortality that have typically been investigated. Furthermore, from the plant perspective, many key parts as well as inconsistencies within this more complex process have not been well explored.
    [Show full text]