Invasive Ants Disperse Seeds Farther Than Native Ants, Affecting The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Invasive Ants Disperse Seeds Farther Than Native Ants, Affecting The Oecologia https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04553-3 PLANT-MICROBE-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS – ORIGINAL RESEARCH Invasive ants disperse seeds farther than native ants, afecting the spatial pattern of seedling recruitment and survival Shannon A. Meadley‑Dunphy1,2 · Kirsten M. Prior1,3 · Megan E. Frederickson1 Received: 22 January 2019 / Accepted: 5 November 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Mutualists can vary in the quantity and quality of service which they provide to their partners. Variation in seed disperser quality depends on seed-processing traits, dispersal distance, and deposition location, all of which ultimately afect plant ft- ness. Here, we compared these aspects of seed dispersal quality between a native and an invasive ant species, and examined how they afect competition and plant performance. Using experimental mesocosm communities, we examined how these two ant species afect the spatial pattern of recruitment and establishment for four myrmecochorous plant species, including one invasive species. We measured the locations of dispersed seedlings relative to ant nests, adult plants, and other dispersed seedlings, as well as measured the efects of location on plant performance. The invasive ant, Myrmica rubra, secondarily dispersed seeds farther from its nests, creating a less clumped pattern of seedling recruitment compared to the native ant, Aphaenogaster rudis. Plant species responded diferently to dispersal. Invasive seedlings recruited farther from adult plants than native seedlings, and had higher survival the farther they were from conspecifcs. In contrast, native plants had higher survival and grew taller when dispersed farther from invasive plants. We show that seed-dispersing ant partners difer in mutualist quality creating diferences in dispersal distance and deposition location that afects a plant’s competitive environ- ment. Our results reveal the potential for long-term consequences on plant community structure with changing ant partner identity. We emphasize the need to examine dispersal quality in addition to quantity to uncover the importance of partner identity in structuring communities. Keywords Aphaenogaster rudis · Biological invasions · Myrmecochory · Myrmica rubra · Seed dispersal · Spatial patterns Introduction Many plants depend on animals to disperse their seeds. The efectiveness of an animal as a seed disperser depends on both the number of seeds it moves and on whether Communicated by Susan Whitehead. dispersed seeds survive, germinate, and grow into adults (Schupp 1993; Schupp et al. 2010). Where a seed ends up Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https ://doi.org/10.1007/s0044 2-019-04553 -3) contains after dispersal establishes the abiotic and biotic environ- supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. ment, it will experience throughout its life. This includes local resource availability and microhabitat conditions; as * Shannon A. Meadley-Dunphy well as the strength of its interactions with other plants, ani- [email protected] mals (e.g., herbivores), and soil or other microbes (Kjells- 1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, son 1991; Kalisz et al. 1999; Gorb and Gorb 2003; Tanaka University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, and Tokuda 2016). Thus, where an animal moves, a seed ON M5S 3B2, Canada afects plant performance for many years following the dis- 2 Present Address: Department of Biology, McGill University, persal event, and is a key component of an animal’s seed 1205 Dr Penfeld Ave, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada dispersal efectiveness. However, because it is difcult to 3 Present Address: Department of Biological Sciences, track seeds through space and monitor their fates through Binghamton University, State University of New York, time, most studies measure only the quantity and not the P. O. Box 6000, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Oecologia quality of seed dispersal (including our own, Meadley Dun- Aphaenogaster rudis s.l. This ant is considered a keystone phy et al. 2016). To fully understand the efectiveness of mutualist, because A. rudis disperses as many as 70% of the diferent seed dispersers, we need to measure their efects seeds it encounters and is also the most common woodland on the whole dispersal process, from how many seeds they ant (Ness et al. 2009). Plants gain multiple benefts from move, to where they deposit seeds, to the efect of deposition dispersal by ants including reduced parent–ofspring or seed- location on plant performance. Here, we investigate how ling competition (Kalisz et al. 1999; Boyd 2001), reduced two seed-dispersing species difer in their dispersal qual- seed predation (O’Dowd and Hay 1980; Heithaus 1981), and ity. In particular, we compare (1) how the ant species afect directed dispersal to favorable microhabitats (Gibson 1993). the spatial pattern of seedling recruitment and (2) the efect The outcome of myrmecochory is often sensitive to of deposition location on later stages of plant performance, changes in the local ant assemblage, because ant species including plant survival and growth (Fig. 1). difer in how they interact with seeds (Gorb and Gorb 1999; We focused on seed dispersal by ants (myrmecochory), Giladi 2006; Ness et al. 2009; Prior et al. 2015). Most myr- which, especially in eastern North America, is a widespread mecochory studies measure only the rate of seed removal or mutualistic interaction (Beattie and Culver 1981; Handel quantity of dispersal from depots by diferent ant species, et al. 1981). Generally, seed-dispersing ants pick up seeds because the small size of ants and the seeds which they carry with nutrient-rich food bodies (elaiosomes) attached, bring makes them difcult to track (Canner and Spence 2011). them to their nests (primary dispersal), remove and feed Diferences in seed removal rates between ant species are the elaiosomes to their larvae, and fnally deposit seeds in a often attributed to diferences in ant or seed size, because midden (secondary dispersal) (Gorb and Gorb 2003; Giladi small ants are unlikely to move large seeds (e.g., Christian 2006). Worldwide, the seeds of an estimated 11,000 plant 2001; Ness et al. 2004). However, the quality of seed dis- species have elaiosomes (i.e., are myrmecochores) (Lengyel persal also varies among ant species, including the length et al. 2009), and in the deciduous forests of northeastern of time which a seed remains within an ant nest (Prior et al. North America, as many as 30% of herbaceous plants have 2014), the distance seeds are dispersed (Ness et al. 2004; seeds with elaiosomes (Beattie and Culver 1981; Handel Leal et al. 2014a), and deposition location (Gorb et al. 2000), et al. 1981). In eastern North America, members of this all of which can afect plant ftness. In eastern North Ameri- diverse plant guild have their seeds dispersed primarily by can forests, myrmecochorous plants have historically been (a) Removal (b) Deposition (c) Germination (d) Survival (2012) (2012) (2013) (2014) Removes fewer seeds A. rudis strong Native ant Seeds close together Plant Plant Ant traits Competition Competition Removes more seeds strong M. rubra Invasive ant Seeds far apart Prior et al.2014, 2015 This study Prior et al.2015 This study Fig. 1 Conceptual illustration of the mechanisms afecting the seed suggest that A. rudis deposited seeds in a clumped pattern closer to dispersal process in our experimental mesocosms. For both ants and their nests, while M. rubra spread seeds out around mesocosms. Rep- plants, native and invasive species are represented by black and red resentative A. rudis and M. rubra mesocosms show seedling loca- cartoons, respectively. Colored boxes represent mechanistic flters tions. c More seedlings of the invasive plant, C. majus, germinated in determining diferent stages in the dispersal process—seed deposi- the M. rubra mesocosm than any other plant–ant combination (Prior tion, and seedling germination and establishment. Solid black arrows et al. 2015). The current study shows that that outcome was likely show a positive efect of the mechanistic flters, while dashed arrows a result of a combination of strong parent–ofspring competition in show a negative efect. Gray arrows indicate no signifcant efect. C. majus and M. rubra moving seeds farther away from the parent a Variation in ant traits such as colony size, foraging rate, and seed plants. d Here, we show that for seedlings of all species, survival handling time afected how many seeds each ant species initially was negatively afected by the distance to the nearest C. majus plant. removed. The invasive ant, M. rubra, removed more seeds overall Native plants also grew taller when they were dispersed farther from regardless of plant species (Prior et al. 2014, 2015). b Although we C. majus. Distance to the nearest native plant did not afect seedling did not directly measure seed deposition location, seedling locations survival (color fgure online) 1 3 Oecologia most likely to interact with A. rudis (Ness et al. 2009), but ant species that best meet their dispersal needs, and plant with the recent introduction of ant species around the globe species may also be afected diferently by changes in ant (McGlynn 1999; Suarez et al. 2010; Wetterer and Radchenko community composition. 2011), ant-dispersed plants are increasingly likely to also In this study, we investigated how four myrmecochorous interact with diferent ant species, including invasive ants. plant species with two different life-history strategies There are about 200 introduced ant species globally respond to dispersal by two ant species, A. rudis or M. rubra. (Holway et al. 2002), and several are known to change the These two species belong to the same behavioral seed-dis- outcome of myrmecochory in their introduced ranges (e.g., persing guild, but vary in traits related to seed dispersal. Ness and Bronstein 2004; Stuble et al. 2009; Rodriguez- Three common myrmecochores native to our study region, Cabal et al. 2011). The invasive ants that have been well Anemone acutiloba L.
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Myrmecochore Species Abundance
    EFFECTS OF MYRMECOCHORE SPECIES ABUNDANCE, DIVERSITY, AND FRUITING PHENOLOGY ON APHAENOGASTER (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) NESTING AND FORAGING IN SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN RICH COVE FORESTS A Thesis presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Western Carolina University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology. By Mary N. Schultz Director: Dr. James T. Costa, Western Carolina University Biology Department Committee Members: Dr. Beverly Collins, Western Carolina University Biology Department Dr. Robert Warren III, State University of New York College at Buffalo Biology Department April, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee members and director for their assistance and support, particularly logistical, conceptual, and editorial guidance from Dr. Beverly Collins; statistical and editorial assistance from Dr. Robert Warren; and keen proofreading and editorial comments from Dr. James T. Costa. I would also like to thank Dr. Mark Bradford, Yale school of Forestry and Environmental Studies, for funding my research. I am eternally grateful to my husband, David Clarke, for his continued unwavering support, in the field and out; none of this would have been possible without him. Lastly, my sincere appreciation for generous counsel and sage advice from my friends, Josh Kelly and Jay Kranyik. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Dispersal by Ants in Jarrah Forest Restorations of Western Australia
    Seed Dispersal by Ants in Jarrah Forest Restorations of Western Australia Troy L. Wanless Introduction The jarrah forests in Western Australia cover approximately 1.75 million ha in the southwestern corner of the state (Figure 1). Jarrah, otherwise known as Eucalyptus marginata, is only one species among many that inhabit a region with considerable physical and biological diversity. 1200 species of plants, 29 mammalian species, 45 reptile species, 17 frog species, 4 fish species and 150 bird species live in this system which also has highly adverse conditions for survival. These may include infertile, often salt-laden soils, drought, and the occasional wildfire (Western Australia Forest Alliance, 2003). Considerable deposits of bauxite, which is the primary material involved in the production of aluminum, are scattered throughout the region. Since 1963, Alcoa of Australia Ltd. has cleared these jarrah forests to make way for mining of this ore. It is estimated that these deposits cover 7-8% of the forested area although only 3-4% will ever be mined due to environmental and economic constraints (Majer, 1989). These mined areas create a scattering of patches throughout the forest that are essentially stripped of any kind of biodiversity that was once there (Figure 2). Restoration efforts on these previously mined patches focus on many aspects of the jarrah forest ecosystem. Specifically interesting is the role that ants play in seed dispersal. This paper will focus on the topic of seed dispersal by ants in the northern jarrah forests of Western Australia while paying particular attention to myrmecochory. Figure 1. Location of jarrah forest in Australia Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants, Plants, and Seed Dispersal Ignorance: How Do Ants Enhance Persistence?
    Ants, Plants, and Seed Dispersal Ignorance: How do Ants Enhance Persistence? Charles Kwit, Assistant Professor, Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries [email protected] Wednesday, 11 September 2013 12:20 PM, 160 Plant Biotech Building 1 Acknowledgements 2 References Albrecht and McCarthy (2011), Plant Ecology 212: 1465-1477 Berg-Binder and Suarez (2012), Oecologia 169: 763-772 Bond (2001), American Journal of Botany 88: 234-241 Canner et al. (2012), Acta Oecologica 40: 31-39 Christian & Stanton (2004), Ecology 85: 1101-1110 Culver & Beattie (1978), Journal of Ecology 66: 53-72 Garrido et al. (2009), Acta Oecologica 35: 393-399 Gomez et al. (2003), Ecography 26: 532-538 Imbert (2006), Plant Species Biology 21: 109-117 Kwit et al. (2012), American Midland Naturalist 168: 9-17 Leal et al. (2007), Annals of Botany 99: 885-894 Lengyel et al. (2010), Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 12: 43-55 Lobstein & Rockwood (1993), Virginia Journal of Science 44: 59-72 Lopez-Vila & Garcia-Fayos (2005), Acta Oecologica 28: 157-162 Manzaneda & Rey (2012), Ecography 35: 322-332 Martins et al. (2006), Sociobiology 47: 265-274 Ness et al. (2009), Oikos 118: 1793-1804 Ohkawara (2005), Plant Species Biology 20: 145-148 Passos & Ferriera (1996), Biotropica 28: 697-700 Rico-Gray & Oliveira (2007), The Ecology and Evolution of Ant-Plant Interactions Smith et al. (1989), Ecology 70: 1649-1656 Soriano et al. (2012), Plant Biosystems 146: 143-152 Whigham (2004), Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 583-621 3 Outline ✤ Myrmecochory and ant-plant mutualism ✤ Ant “seed treatment” experiment ✤ New natural history information ✤ Ant “seed dispersal” experiment ✤ Future directions 4 Myrmecochory and ant-plant mutualism ✤ Seed dispersal by ants, aided by elaiosome ✤ Common phenomenon found in > 11,000 plant species (Lengyel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • U Tech Glossary
    URGLOSSARY used without permission revised the Ides of March 2014 glos·sa·ry Pronunciation: primarystressglässchwaremacron, -ri also primarystressglodots- Function: noun Inflected Form(s): -es Etymology: Medieval Latin glossarium, from Latin glossa difficult word requiring explanation + -arium -ary : a collection of textual glosses <an edition of Shakespeare with a good glossary> or of terms limited to a special area of knowledge <a glossary of technical terms> or usage <a glossary of dialectal words> Merriam Webster Unabridged tangent, adj. and n. [ad. L. tangens, tangent-em, pr. pple. of tangĕre to touch; used by Th. Fincke, 1583, as n. in sense = L. līnea tangens tangent or touching line. In F. tangent, -e adj., tangente n. (Geom.), Ger. tangente n.] c. In general use, chiefly fig. from b, esp. in phrases (off) at, in, upon a tangent, ie off or away with sudden divergence, from the course or direction previously followed; abruptly from one course of action, subject, thought, etc, to another. (http://dictionary.oed.com) As in off on a tangent. “Practice, repetition, and repetition of the repeated with ever increasing intensity are…the way.” Zen in the Art of Archery by Eugen Herrigel. For many terms, this glossary contains definitions from multiple sources, each with their own nuance, each authors variation emphasized. Reading the repeated definitions, with their slight variations, helps create a fuller, more overall understanding of the meaning of these terms. The etymology of the entries reinforces and may repeat the repetitions. Wax on, wax off. Sand da floor. For sometime, when I encounter a term I don’t understand (and there are very many), I have been looking them up in the oed and copying the definition into a Word document.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Dispersal Mutualisms Are Essential for the Survival of Diverse Plant Species and Communities Worldwide
    ABSTRACT YOUNGSTEADT, ELSA KRISTEN. Neotropical Ant-Gardens: Behavioral and Chemical Ecology of an Obligate Ant-Plant Mutualism. (Under the direction of Coby Schal.) Seed dispersal mutualisms are essential for the survival of diverse plant species and communities worldwide. An outstanding but poorly understood ant-seed mutualism occurs in the Amazonian rainforest, where arboreal ants collect seeds of several taxonomically diverse plant species and cultivate them in nutrient-rich nests, forming abundant hanging gardens known as ant-gardens (AGs). AG ants and plants are dominant members of lowland Amazonian ecosystems, and their interaction is obligate and apparently species-specific. Though established AGs are limited to specific participants, it is unknown at what stage specificity arises. Seed fate pathways in AG epiphytes are undocumented, and the recognition cues that mediate the mutualism are unknown. Here the species specificity of the AG ant-seed interaction is assessed, and chemical cues are characterized that elicit seed- finding and seed-carrying in AG ants. To examine the specificity of the ant-seed interaction, general food baits and seeds of the AG plant Peperomia macrostachya were offered on alternate days at 108 bait stations. Seventy ant species were detected at food baits and could have interacted with AG seeds, but only three species collected P. macrostachya seeds, and 84% of observed seed removal by ants was attributed to C. femoratus. In a separate experiment, arthropod exclusion significantly reduced AG seed removal rates, but vertebrate exclusion did not. Thus species specific seed dispersal, rather than post-dispersal processes, appears to be the primary determinant of the distribution of AG plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Early Flowering in Myrmecochorous Plants an Adaptation for Ant
    Is early flowering in myrmecochorous plants an adaptation for ant dispersal? JAVIER GUITIÁN and JOSÉ L. GARRIDO Departamento de Botánica, Facultad de Biología, Campus Sur, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15708, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain Abstract To analyze the extent to which early flowering of specialized myrmecochorous plants (i.e. plants producing elaiosome-bearing seeds) may be the result of adaptation for ant dis- persal, we investigated flowering and fruiting patterns of common herb and shrub-layer species in a beechwood forest at the western end of the Cantabrian Range (Spain). Over the same period, we estimated ant abundance, the availability of alternative foods for ants, and the rate of removal of seeds by ants. Our results indicate: (i) that the flowering peaks of most strict myrmecochores occurred approximately 4 weeks earlier than in non- myrmecochores; (ii) that the fruiting peak of both groups of plants occurred around the same time, in early July; (iii) that the peak in ant abundance coincides with the seed availability peak, and precedes the peak in availability of alternative ant foods; and (iv) that the probability of seed removal by Formica rufibarbis (the only ant species present in the study area) varies over the season, peaking in early July. In conclusion, our results show that despite differences in seed size, plants with ant-dispersed seeds show highly synchronous flowering, suggesting that strict myrmecochores in our study area may have adapted their phenologies to the seasonal availability of dispersers. Keywords: elaiosome, flowering phenology, fruiting phenology, seed removal, seed size, myrmecochory. Introduction outside the nest where it may germinate.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporating Redispersal Into Myrmecochory: Addressing the Uniqueness of Microsites Near Ant Nests in an Eastern North American Forest
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2015 Incorporating redispersal into myrmecochory: Addressing the uniqueness of microsites near ant nests in an eastern North American forest Kent Connell [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Connell, Kent, "Incorporating redispersal into myrmecochory: Addressing the uniqueness of microsites near ant nests in an eastern North American forest" (2015). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1816 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Title: Incorporating redispersal into myrmecochory: Addressing the uniqueness of 2 microsites near ant nests in an eastern North American forest 3 4 Author: R. Kent Connell 5 Advisor: Charles Kwit 6 7 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 8 TN, USA, 37996-0001 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Author email: 23 [email protected] 24 Abstract 25 While ‘benefits of directed dispersal’ studies in myrmecochorous systems have 26 compared the properties of soils underneath myrmecochores to the soils in the nests of 27 ants that disperse their seeds, none have explored the properties of soils nearby ant 28 nests, where recent work indicates seeds are quickly “redispersed” in eastern North 29 American myrmecochorous systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Pollinators, Seed Dispersers and Belowground Symbionts in the Invasion Success of Acacia
    Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Do mutualists matter? The role of pollinators, seed dispersers and belowground symbionts in the invasion success of Acacia __________________________________ A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Elizabeth M. Wandrag _______________________________ Lincoln University, New Zealand 2012 Abstract Plant species introduced to new locations may lose their natural enemies but can also leave behind important mutualists. Here, I take a novel comparative approach to identify the potential role of mutualistic interactions in determining invasion outcomes. I examine the strength of pollination, seed dispersal and belowground symbioses with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) across three species that vary in invasion success in both their introduced and native range. I used species of Australian Acacia introduced to New Zealand. I hypothesised that if interactions with mutualists are important for plant invasion then species would vary in the strength of interactions with one or more of the groups of mutualists I examined, and that the pattern of variation would correlate with the degree to which they have established and spread in New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Gesneriad Reference
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIzONS TO BOTANY NUMBER 29 A Study of the Tribe Gesnerieae, with a Revision of Gesneria (Gesneriaceae: Gesnerioideae) Laurence E. Skog SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1976 ABSTRACT Skog, Laurence E. A Study of the Tribe Gesnerieae, with a Revision of Gesneria (Gesneriaceae: Gesnerioideae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, number 29, 182 pages, 86 figures, 9 tables, 1976.-A study is made of the tribe Gesnerieae of the family Gesneriaceae from the West Indies, giving information on history, anatomy and morphology, pollination and dispersal, and hybridization in the tribe. The tribe comprises 67 species in 3 genera: Rhytidophyllztm, Gesneria, and Pheidonocarpa. The last genus is described as new, with a new species com- bination, Pheidonocarpa corymbosa (Swartz) L. Skog, and 2 subspecies. A revi- sion of Gesneria Linnaeus is presented based on field and herbarium studies. Gesneria is divided into 9 sections, 46 species (a new species, Gesneria onycho- calyx L. Skog, is described), 12 subspecies, and 11 varieties. The taxonomic portion includes keys, synonymies, descriptions, typifications, distributions, and ecology, as well as distribution maps and illustrations of the taxa. Also enum- erated in Appendix 1 are many species names once included in Gesnera or Gesneria, but which have been transferred to other genera. Two new combina- tions are made in this portion of the text: Rhytidophyllum cumanense (Han- stein) L. Skog and Rhytidophyllum onacaense (Rusby) L. Skog. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SI PRESSNUMBER 6053. SERIESCOYER DFSIGN: Leaf clearing from the Katsura tree Cercidifihyllum japonicum Siebold and Zuccarini.
    [Show full text]
  • Boydfrde2001.Pdf
    American Journal of Botany 88(2): 234±241. 2001. ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS OF MYRMECOCHORY FOR THE ENDANGERED CHAPARRAL SHRUB FREMONTODENDRON DECUMBENS (STERCULIACEAE)1 ROBERT S. BOYD Department of Biological Sciences and Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama 36849-5407 USA Fremontodendron decumbens grows in a single county in central California, USA. Prior research showed that its elaiosome-bearing seeds are dispersed by the harvester ant Messor andrei. I tested several hypotheses regarding the positive role of ant-mediated dispersal to F. decumbens: (1) Does ant-mediated seed dispersal facilitate seed escape from rodent predation?; (2) Does ant processing of seeds stimulate germination?; (3) Are ant middens more suitable microsites for seed or seedling survival in unburned chaparral areas?; and (4) Do survival bene®ts of dispersal occur post-®re in the form of differences in seedling survival probabilities and, if so, why? Results of tests of each hypothesis were: (1) similar percentages of seeds placed on ant middens and under F. decumbens shrub canopies were destroyed by rodents, but seeds from which elaiosomes had been removed were more likely to escape rodent predation; (2) seeds processed by ants did not germinate more readily than seeds removed directly from shrub branches; (3) seedling predation was a major cause of mortality in unburned chaparral on both ant middens and under shrubs, and overall seedling survival did not differ between the two microsites; (4) post-burn seedling survival was signi®cantly greater for seedlings dispersed away from F. decumbens shrub canopies, because dispersed seedlings were both less likely to be killed by predators and more likely to be growing in a gap created by the ®re-caused death of an established shrub.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant Autoecology
    A comparison of the autecology of two seed-taking ant genera, Rhytidoponera and Melophorus Jonathan D Majer Aaron D Gove Stan Sochacki Philip Searle Christopher Portlock Abstract Members of the genus Rhytidoponera and, to a lesser extent, certain Melophorus spp. are keystone mutualists for the dispersal of seeds in the southwest of Western Australia, with important ramifications for the ecology and speciation of plants in this biodiversity hotspot. For this reason, it is important to understand the autecology of the relevant ant species and the way in which they interact with plant seeds. This paper addresses key aspects of the ecology of three such ant species, Rhytidoponera violacea (Forel), R. inornata Crawley and Melophorus turneri perthensis Wheeler. Data are presented on their geographic distribution, seasonality of foraging, diurnal activity, response to fire, nest site preference, nest structure, colony size, feeding habits, foraging response to seed availability, and seedling emergence from nests. The role of all three species as seed dispersers is confirmed, and all three species have ecologies that are well-suited for dispersal and survival of native plant seeds. Preservation of this interaction is important for the conservation of plants, and it is fortuitous that all three species are able to survive disturbance and return to rehabilitated areas. However, the smaller R. inornata, and to a lesser extent, the larger R. violacea, are vulnerable to invasive ant (Pheidole megacephala (Fabricius) incursions. M. turneri perthensis is able to coexist with the invasive ant unless this is at high densities, probably as a result of its ability to forage during high temperatures when the invasive species is inactive.
    [Show full text]
  • “Redirecting” the Study of Mutualistic Benefits to Plants in Myrmecochory
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Faculty Publications and Other Works -- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Fall 2014 “Redirecting” the Study of Mutualistic Benefits oT Plants In Myrmecochory Mariah Taylor Patton [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_ecolpubs Recommended Citation Patton, Mariah T. "“Redirecting” the study of mutualistic benefits ot plants in myrmecochory" (2014). University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Other Works -- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Redirecting” the study of mutualistic benefits to plants in myrmecochory By Mariah Patton Mentor: Dr. Charles Kwit 1 Abstract Myrmecochory is typically cast as a mutualistic relationship in which seed dispersal of plants with elaiosome-bearing seeds is performed by ants. Benefits of this mutualism may seem simple at first: ants gain a nutritive reward via elaiosomes, while plant propagules gain protection and a more suitable microsite for establishment and growth. However, there is growing literature suggesting that ants may not consistently receive benefits from elaiosome-based diets, and studies depicting plant benefits are constrained by the “ideal” model framework, by temporal limitations, and by limitations of sources of mortality that have typically been investigated. Furthermore, from the plant perspective, many key parts as well as inconsistencies within this more complex process have not been well explored.
    [Show full text]