DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

*Estimates - QON No. E18-001 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY SELECT COMMITTEE ON ESTIMATES 2018-2019 Mr Andrew Wall MLA (Chair), Ms Tara Cheyne MLA (Deputy Chair), Ms Caroline Le Couteur MLA, Ms Elizabeth Lee MLA, Ms Suzanne Orr MLA QUESTION ON NOTICE Mr Alistair Coe MLA: To ask the Minister for Economic Development Ref: CMTEDD, 2018-19 Budget Paper 3, pages 88-90, 2018-19 Budget Statement B, pages 20-21, 33- 35, Output Class 3.1: Innovation, Trade and Investment In relation to: Accountability Indicators - grants 1. Why has the Government cut support for individual innovation, in particular in relation to grants? 2. Why did the Government fail to meet the accountability indicator for "Innovation Connect (Icon) successful grant applications"? 3. Further to part 2, what was the value of: a. The grants administered; b. The allocation not spent in relation to this indicator. 4. Why did the Government fail to meet the number of 1'Trade Connect grants delivered"? 5. Further to part 4, what was the value of: a. The grants administered; b. The allocation not spent in relation to this indicator. 6. Why has the 2018-19 target for "Number of international trade and investment campaigns and delegations" only increased by one? Mr Andrew Barr MLA: The answer to the Member's question is as follows:- 1. Questions 1 and 2 are answered together as they appear to relate to accountability indicator (e) Innovation Connect (Icon) successful grant applications (Outcome 12, against Target 15}. The independent Innovation Connect Assessment Panel allocated funding to 12 applications which it considered to be best placed to use grant funding to accelerate commercialisation and company development outcomes from the 61 expressions of interest received. The program is competitive in design, i.e., it is not an entitlement based program. Panel assessments are made on which applications have the best potential return on investment consistent with the program guidelines. ACT Government support for business innovation is comprehensive and in transition to an eco-system based model. For example, outside Innovation Connect the Government provides base funding of $1.25 million to the CBR Innovation Network which delivers individual innovation and entrepreneurship support through the GRIFFIN Accelerator, KILN Incubator, STIR (crowd voted grants for creative projects), Entry29 co-working space, Millhouse Social Enterprise, and Lean Startup Workshops. In 2017-18, approximately 650 small companies and emerging entrepreneurs participated in these program channels. 2. See above response to Question 1. 3. Parts below: 3a. $292,000 in grants to individual companies through Innovation Connect. 3b. The Innovation Connect indicator does not have a defined appropriation. However, the total value of grants provided within the year is managed to a ceiling internal budget allocation of $500,000. 4. The Trade Connect program was put on hold in the late 2017 as part of an internal review of the way support is provided for export development. Market development grants to individual companies were subsequently discontinued, with emphasis switched to supporting and preparing companies to participate in structured trade missions which provide a more supported and managed environment to assist companies. Partner organisations including the CBR Innovation Network, Screen Canberra and Canberra Business Chamber also deliver more individualised company-based support in the context of trade missions. Further to this, the ACT Government provided $200,000 to the Canberra Business Chamber in 2017-18 to deliver the Capacity and Capability Growth Program for ACT Exporters, which included the provision of training and mentoring services for ACT exporters to facilitate market entry, provision of international trade networking events and seminars aligned to the priorities of the International Engagement Strategy. These services are aligned to participation in key markets and trade missions. Sa. $7,289 (three Trade Connect grants were provided prior to the changes noted in 4.) Sb. The Trade Connect indicator does not have a defined appropriation. However, the total value of grants provided in previous years was managed to a ceiling internal budget allocation of $200,000. Page 2 of 3 6. This indicator has been achieving a year-end result of 3 since 2013-14. In the 2017-18 period a result of 4 was achieved, consistent with the Government's increased focus on international engagement, advice from the Commissioner for International Engagement, and a contingency for enjoined offshore mission activity with the Australian Government. Approved for circulation to the Select Committee on Estimates 2018-2019 Signature: ~£ Date:/(./. I~ By the Minister for Economic Development, Andrew Barr MLA Page 3 of 3 *Estimates - QON No. E18- 00'2 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY SELECT COMMITTEE ON ESTIMATES 2018-2019 Mr Andrew Wall MLA (Chair), Ms Tara Cheyne MLA (Deputy Chair), Ms Caroline Le Couteur MLA, Ms Elizabeth Lee MLA, Ms Suzanne Orr MLA QUESTION ON NOTICE Mr Alistair Coe MLA: To ask the Minister for Economic Development Ref: CMTEDD, 2018-19 Budget Paper 3, pages 88-90, 2018-19 Budget Statement B, pages 20-21, 33- 35, Output Class 3.1: Innovation, Trade and Investment In relation to: Accountability Indicators - major project facilitation 1. What are the two "Major projects under facilitation management" indicated in new accountability indicator "Private sector investment facilitation"? 2. Further to part 1, are these the two projects from the unsolicited bids discontinued accountability indicator? 3. Is the "Major projects under facilitation management" accountability indicator linked to the Budget initiative More jobs for our growing city- Facilitating major projects? a. If yes, please advise: i. Why is there only funding allocated for 2018-19 and 2019-20, and not across the forward estimates; ii. What the $800,000 allocated to each of the next two financial years will be spent on. Mr Andrew Barr MLA: The answer to the Member's question is as follows:- 1. The 2018/19 target reflects the existing base of work and timelines around a proposal by the University of New South Wales {UNSW} to expand its operations in the Territory with a new Campus in the City's East, and a proposal relating to the future use of Canberra Technology Park as a higher education and community precinct, including student accommodation. Other project facilitation work is also expected as projects evolve. 2. The Canberra Technology Park proposal has carried over from the discontinued accountability indicator for the 'Number of investment facilitation projects that required dedicated supported'. 3. The 'Major projects under facilitation management' accountability indicator is linked to the Budget initiative 'More Jobs for our growing city- Facilitating major projects' a. Noting that funding: i. has been provided for an initial period to focus on a small number of priority projects that require dedicated support. The ongoing need for this role will be evaluated and reviewed over the two year period; and ii. will be used for a combination of staff resourcing and the acquisition of specialist project based advice and consultancies as needed. Approved for circulation to the Select Committee on Estimates 2018-2019 Signature:~~ Date: lb• 7.1&- By the Minister for Economic Development, Andrew Barr MLA Page 2 of 2 *Estimates - QON No. E18-003 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY SELECT COMMITTEE ON ESTIMATES 2018-2019 Mr Andrew Wall MLA (Chair), Ms Tara Cheyne MLA (Deputy Chair), Ms Caroline Le Couteur MLA, Ms Elizabeth Lee MLA, Ms Suzanne Orr MLA QUESTION ON NOTICE Mr Alistair Coe MLA: To ask the Minister for Economic Development Ref: CMTEDD, 2018-19 Budget Paper 3, pages 88-90, 2018-19 Budget Statement B, pages 20-21, 33- 35, Output Class 3.1: Innovation, Trade and Investment In relation to: Accountability Indicators - Ongoing programs as accountability indicators 1. Will the Government only have to participate in ongoing programs to meet the new accountability indicators "Sector capability building"; "Support for innovation eco-system building"; and "Private sector investment facilitation"? 2. Why have the accountability indicators referenced in part 1 been implemented; and what are the specific actual results or outcomes that will be achieved? Ms Yvette Berry MLA: The answer to the Member's question is as follows:- 1. No. See below for further explanation. 2. The accountability indicators referenced in Output 3.1 reflect the work to diversify the economy through targeted sector development, innovation eco-system building and private sector investment facilitation. Within each strategy there are a broad array of sublevel activities -for example, funded programs, influencing agendas, partnership activities with other players including Australian Government agencies, and work on broader economic enablers such as human capital and international engagement. Approved for circulation to the Select Committee on Estimates 2018-2019 c__ .. Signature: --=/ ~:: > Date: r'::---- ... By the acting Minister forl:conomic ~evelopment, Yvett€ Berry MLA *Estimates - QON No. E18-004 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY SELECT COMMITTEE ON ESTIMATES 2018-2019 Mr Andrew Wall MLA (Chair), Ms Tara Cheyne MLA (Deputy Chair), Ms Caroline Le Couteur MLA, Ms Elizabeth Lee MLA, Ms Suzanne Orr MLA QUESTION ON NOTICE Mr Alistair Coe MLA: To ask the Minister for Economic Development
Recommended publications
  • Self- Government) Ministerial Appointment 2021 (No 1

    Self- Government) Ministerial Appointment 2021 (No 1

    Australian Capital Territory Australian Capital Territory (Self- Government) Ministerial Appointment 2021 (No 1) Notifiable instrument NI2021–85 made under the Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988, s 41 (Ministers for the Territory) and s 44 (Deputy Chief Minister for the Territory) 1 Name of instrument This instrument is the Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Ministerial Appointment 2021 (No 1). 2 Commencement This instrument commences on the day after it is made. 3 Appointment (1) I appoint each member of the Legislative Assembly named in schedule 1 to be a Minister. (2) I also appoint Yvette Berry to be Deputy Chief Minister. 4 Titles of Ministers The titles of Ministers are as mentioned in schedule 1. Andrew Barr Chief Minister 16 February 2021 Authorised by the ACT Parliamentary Counsel—also accessible at www.legislation.act.gov.au Schedule 1 Ministers and Ministerial titles (see s 3 and s 4) Name of Minister Ministerial title Andrew Barr Treasurer Minister for Climate Action Minister for Economic Development Minister for Tourism Yvette Berry Minister for Early Childhood Development Minister for Education and Youth Affairs Minister for Housing and Suburban Development Minister for Women Minister for the Prevention of Domestic and Family Violence Minister for Sport and Recreation Mick Gentleman Minister for Planning and Land Management Minister for Police and Emergency Services Minister for Corrections Minister for Industrial Relations and Workplace Safety Shane Rattenbury Attorney-General Minister for
  • Inquiry Into Nature in Our City

    Inquiry Into Nature in Our City

    INQUIRY INTO NATURE IN OUR CITY S TANDING C OMMITTEE ON E NVIRONMENT AND T RANSPORT AND C ITY S ERVICES F EBRUARY 2020 REPORT 10 I NQUIRY INTO N ATURE IN O UR C ITY THE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP CURRENT MEMBERS Ms Tara Cheyne MLA Chair (from 23 August 2019) Miss Candice Burch MLA Member (from 15 Feb 2018) and Deputy Chair (from 28 Feb 2018) Mr James Milligan MLA Member (from 20 September 2018) PREVIOUS MEMBERS Mr Steve Doszpot MLA Deputy Chair (until 25 November 2017) Mr Mark Parton MLA Member (until 15 February 2018) Ms Tara Cheyne MLA Member (until 20 September 2018) Ms Nicole Lawder MLA Member (15 February 2018 to 20 September 2018) Ms Suzanne Orr MLA Chair (until 23 August 2019) SECRETARIAT Danton Leary Committee Secretary (from June 2019) Annemieke Jongsma Committee Secretary (April 2019 to June 2019) Brianna McGill Committee Secretary (May 2018 to April 2019) Frieda Scott Senior Research Officer Alice Houghton Senior Research Officer Lydia Chung Administration Michelle Atkins Administration CONTACT INFORMATION Telephone 02 6205 0124 Facsimile 02 6205 0432 Post GPO Box 1020, CANBERRA ACT 2601 Email [email protected] Website www.parliament.act.gov.au i S TANDING C OMMITTEE ON E NVIRONMENT AND T RANSPORT AND C ITY S ERVICES RESOLUTION OF APPOINTMENT The Legislative Assembly for the ACT (the Assembly) agreed by resolution on 13 December 2016 to establish legislative and general purpose standing committees to inquire into and report on matters referred to them by the Assembly or matters that are considered by
  • You Can't Be What You Can't See— Women

    You Can't Be What You Can't See— Women

    Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory 49th Presiding Officers and Clerks Conference Wellington, New Zealand 8-13 July 2018 You can’t be what you can’t see— Women in the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory Paper to be presented by Joy Burch, MLA, Speaker of the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory Page 1 of 10 ‘Any way you look at it there are many, many women who are capable of that job of leadership and making an impact at every level of government and I think we should see more”1 “Women in politics do make a difference and they can change people’s perceptions of politics – they also change the structural discrimination of old-style political systems and parliamentary conventions”2 1 Rosemary Follett, ‘Rosemary Follett and Kate Carnell reunited to sight sexism in politics’ Canberra Times 7th March 2015. 2 Katy Gallagher, ACT Chief Minister, katygallagher.net/blog blog post, 1st October 2014. Page 2 of 10 Introduction Women have played an important and prominent role in the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory since its establishment in 1989. The ACT was the first state or territory to have a woman as its Head of Government. In the Second Assembly, the positions of Speaker, Chief Minister and Leader of the Opposition were all held by women. Perhaps most significantly, at the Territory election for the Ninth Assembly in 2016, thirteen women were elected to the Assembly. It was the first time in Australian history that a majority of women had been elected to a parliament and one of the first jurisdictions in the world to have done so.3 It was also notable that the voters of the ACT returned this result even though only 36 percent of the total 140 candidates that stood for election were women.
  • Parliamentary and Governing Agreement: 10Th Legislative

    Parliamentary and Governing Agreement: 10Th Legislative

    1 2 Parliamentary and Governing Agreement 10th Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory This Agreement is between: Andrew Barr MLA, Leader of the Australian Labor Party ACT Branch, Yvette Berry MLA, Deputy Leader of the Australian Labor Party ACT Branch The ACT Labor MLAs elected for the 10th Assembly And Shane Rattenbury MLA, ACT Greens Leader The ACT Greens MLAs elected for the 10th Assembly Shared Progressive Principles and Values The ACT Labor and ACT Greens Parliamentary and Governing Agreement for the 10th Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly represents the parties’ shared commitment to serve the people of the ACT. We agree to the following key priorities and outcomes, working respectfully, constructively and collaboratively as a two-party Government to govern with, for and in the best interests of Canberrans. ACT Labor and the ACT Greens have, over two previous terms, demonstrated that we can work together in government to deliver the most progressive and reformist administration in Australia. This effective collaboration is built on trust, mutual respect and our many shared values and goals. This new Agreement comes at a defining moment in our Territory’s history, and outlines a strategy to address the major social, economic and environmental challenges society faces. Together, we will focus on the fundamental challenges and opportunities facing the ACT as we emerge from a global health and economic crisis: sustainable economic development, protection and creation of secure local jobs, a healthy natural environment, closing the gap for First Nations people, rapid transition to zero net emissions while protecting households, reducing inequality and poverty, providing dignified housing to all Canberrans, and governance with integrity and transparency.
  • 2016 ACT Election Capad Candidate Statements: Analysis at a Glance

    2016 ACT Election Capad Candidate Statements: Analysis at a Glance

    2016 ACT Election CAPaD Candidate Statements: analysis at a glance In 2016 CAPaD invited the candidates for the ACT election to introduce themselves to the electorate and to say why they felt they were suitable for the job of representing us in the Legislative Assembly. We hope you find this summary of the responses by those who were elected, about their perceived relationship with voters, informative. Conclusion In brief our MLAs understandably take a very traditional view of their representative relationship with voters. They are very much about being available for one-on-one interactions out and about on the hustings and by standard correspondence or email. There was some interest in social media but little interest in traditional media. Structured opportunities to meet constituents were also favoured. MLA initiated methods scored low. Interest in promoting or engaging through deliberative and participatory methods was mentioned by six of the MLAs. More detail follows. Response rates Overall: 62 of the 141 (44%) candidates submitted statements By success in being elected 14/25 (56%) of successful and 48/116 (41%) of the unsuccessful candidates By being elected by Party affiliation ALP: 25 candidates, 13 (52%) submitted statements; 7 (28% of all candidates and 54% of those who submitted statements) elected Liberal Party, 25 candidates, 10 (48%) submitted statements; 5 (20% of all candidates and 50% of those who submitted statements) elected The Greens, 15 candidates 13 (67%) submitted statements; of those 2 (13% of all candidates and
  • News of Friends of Grasslands

    News of Friends of Grasslands

    News of Friends of Grasslands Supporting native grassy ecosystems ISSN 1832-6315 July & August 2021 Events … From the President … The close of public submissions in June for the new ACT Natural Resource Sat 10 July 1.30-3.30pm Management (NRM) Plan and the awarding of ACT Environment Grants has Visit to 6 Mile Reserve, near Bungendore. focussed the Committee’s thoughts on what is the role of volunteers such as Register: [email protected] Friends of Grasslands versus that of government in conserving our environment. A new and bold NRM Plan could be a catalyst for the restoration Thurs 29 July, 6.30-8pm, and linking of remnant grassy ecosystems. Online Zoom forum – ‘How do volunteers begin to weed?’ with The work of the ‘Friends’, Land- and Park-care groups in restoring and Margaret Ning and John Fitz Gerald. managing bushland on public lands is highly beneficial in terms of: engendering Register: [email protected] community ownership and a mandate to actively care for their local bush; Sat 14 August,10.30-11.30am & 1.15- ensuring that there is consistent local monitoring and knowledge for managing 4pm these sites; and providing additional expertise and labour beyond the Reading a grassland landscape and resources of the government agencies. learning aboriginal cultural science In the case of FOG, and our work to conserve grassy ecosystems in 2020, FOG with Geoffrey Simpson volunteer hours were 9748, up 248 on 2019. Their financial contribution is Inquiries & registrations: valued at $487,500. [email protected] Franklin Grassland July 7 & August 4 Wednesdays 9-noon Register: [email protected] The latest updates are found on our website at Calendar Visit our website - http://fog.org.au/ Morning tea at Gurubang Dhaura Park after planting on 8 May – see p8 However, the government environmental management agencies have a primary duty to lead stewardship of public lands.
  • The ACT Election 2016: Back to the Future?

    The ACT Election 2016: Back to the Future?

    The ACT election 2016: back to the future? Terry Giesecke 17 February 2017 DOI: 10.4225/50/58a623512b6e6 Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this paper are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of APO. Copyright/Creative commons license: Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU) 12 pages Overview This resource is a summary of the outcome of the ACT election, held in October 2016. It was an unusual election, in that it saw little movement in party support from the previous election in 2012 and no fringe parties or candidates were elected. The main issues were the construction of a tramline, the implementation of tax reform, the demolition of over one thousand houses to resolve asbestos contamination and allegations of corruption. The ACT Election 2016: Back to the future? The ACT election on October 15 was more of a 1950s or 1960s election. In that era little movement occurred from one election to the next. In 1967 political scientist Don Aitkin wrote, “Most Australians have a basic commitment to one or other of the major parties, and very few change their mind from one election to the other”1. Not so today. In the last few years Australia has experienced three one term State/Territory Governments, huge swings from election to election and the rapid rise and fall of new parties. So why was the ACT different? The ACT election saw a swing of 0.5 per cent against the governing ALP and their partner the Greens and a 2.2 per cent swing against the opposition Liberals.
  • Supporting Native Grassy Ecosystems ISSN 1832-6315

    Supporting Native Grassy Ecosystems ISSN 1832-6315

    News of Friends of Grasslands Supporting native grassy ecosystems ISSN 1832-6315 May & June 2021 Events … From the (new) President … I feel it is a great honour and challenge to have been appointed President of Sat 15 May 9.30-11.45am our wonderful organisation at the annual general meeting in March. I am Visit to Yass Gorge. Register: Kath [email protected] looking forward to working with the strong, new FOG Committee for 2021-22. Thank you to Geoff Roberson, who has stepped down after two stints as Sat 5th June, 6-11pm, FOG table at World Environment Day President of FOG. Geoff has been a fantastic leader for our organisation as he Dinner. combines a vision for conservation of what we can do to better conserve grassy Register: [email protected] ecosystems and a willingness to step in and support the diverse array of activities that we undertake. It will be a great challenge to follow his example. Sat 12 June, day/individual sites I also thank Juliey Beckman and Ken Hodgkinson for their service on FOG’s FOG’s Canberra’s grassy on-ground projects. Committee. Register: [email protected] FOG has an ambitious mission for the conservation of grassy ecosystems, Inquiries: which are among the most endangered in Australia. Unlike some other, [email protected] superficially charismatic ecosystems, we have an added challenge in helping our fellow Australians to better appreciate grasslands before we can practically Franklin Grassland advance conservation of these ecosystems. FOG has the most remarkable May 5 & 26 array of activities to promote conservation of grassy ecosystems, including its Wednesdays 9-11am work on education and field trips, on-ground projects, grants and advocacy.
  • Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory

    Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory

    QoN No. 32 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANNING AND URBAN RENEWAL CAROLINE LE C0UTEUR MLA (CHAIR), SUZANNE ORR MLA (DEPUTY CHAIR), TARA CHEYNE MLA, NICOLE LAWDER MLA, JAMES MILLIGAN MLA Inquiry into referred 2016-17 Annual and Financial Reports ANSWER TO QUESTION ON NOTICE 1 7 JAN 2018 NICOLE LAWDER MLA: To ask the Chief Minister Ref: CMTEDD: Urban renewal 9.9 In relation to: City Action Plan - Communicate -Actions for 2016-17 1. What data did the ACT government use to develop a program for 'how to find the experience you're looking for in the city'? 2. What stakeholders did the ACT government work with to better promote events to tourists, local residents and the wider community. a. How did the government choose what stakeholders to work with? b. How many events did the ACT government conduct to engage with stakeholders? c. For each event, what stakeholders attended? d. What was the total cost of each event? e. Provide the outcomes/recommendations of each event, including? i. Summary of items discussed; ii. Actions from each event; iii. Status of each action item. 3. What stakeholders did the ACT government work with to develop a program for "how to find the experience you're looking for in the city? a. How did the government choose what stakeholders to work with? b. How many events did the ACT government conduct to engage with stakeholders? c. For each event, what stakeholders attended? d. What was the total cost of each event? a. Provide the outcomes/recommendations of each event, including? i.
  • Candidates Yerrabi

    Candidates Yerrabi

    Canberra Alliance for Participatory Democracy (CAPaD) www.canberra-alliance.org.au CANDIDATES’ STATEMENTS FOR THE 2016 ACT LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS The electorate of Yerrabi Authorised by Prof Bob Douglas on behalf of Canberra Alliance for Participatory Democracy 1 CONTENTS (CS= CANDIDATE STATEMENT ON FILE) CONTENTS (CS= CANDIDATE STATEMENT ON FILE) ................................................................................................. 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES IN ACT FOR 2016 .............................................................................................................. 4 1. LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PARTY CANDIDATES FOR YERRABI .................................................................................... 5 Dave Green Liberal Democrat Party Candidate for Yerrabi ...................................................................................... 5 Declan Keating Liberal Democrat Party Candidate for Yerrabi ............................................................................... 6 2. LIBERAL PARTY CANDIDATES FOR THE ELECTORATE OF YERRABI ................................................................. 7 Alistair Coe Liberal Candidate for Yerrabi ....................................................................................................................... 7 Amanda Lynch Liberal Candidate for Yerrabi. ...............................................................................................................
  • Parliamentary and Governing Agreement

    Parliamentary and Governing Agreement

    1 2 Parliamentary and Governing Agreement 10th Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory This Agreement is between: Andrew Barr MLA, Leader of the Australian Labor Party ACT Branch, Yvette Berry MLA, Deputy Leader of the Australian Labor Party ACT Branch The ACT Labor MLAs elected for the 10th Assembly And Shane Rattenbury MLA, ACT Greens Leader The ACT Greens MLAs elected for the 10th Assembly Shared Progressive Principles and Values The ACT Labor and ACT Greens Parliamentary and Governing Agreement for the 10th Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly represents the parties’ shared commitment to serve the people of the ACT. We agree to the following key priorities and outcomes, working respectfully, constructively and collaboratively as a two-party Government to govern with, for and in the best interests of Canberrans. ACT Labor and the ACT Greens have, over two previous terms, demonstrated that we can work together in government to deliver the most progressive and reformist administration in Australia. This effective collaboration is built on trust, mutual respect and our many shared values and goals. This new Agreement comes at a defining moment in our Territory’s history, and outlines a strategy to address the major social, economic and environmental challenges society faces. Together, we will focus on the fundamental challenges and opportunities facing the ACT as we emerge from a global health and economic crisis: sustainable economic development, protection and creation of secure local jobs, a healthy natural environment, closing the gap for First Nations people, rapid transition to zero net emissions while protecting households, reducing inequality and poverty, providing dignified housing to all Canberrans, and governance with integrity and transparency.
  • Proof Hansard

    Proof Hansard

    DEBATES OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DAILY HANSARD Edited proof transcript 3 November 2020 This is an EDITED PROOF TRANSCRIPT of proceedings that is subject to further checking. Members’ suggested corrections for the official Weekly Hansard should be lodged in writing with the Hansard office (facsimile 02 6205 0025) no later than Wednesday, 11 November 2020. Answers to questions on notice will appear in the Weekly Hansard. Tuesday, 3 November 2020 Notice convening meeting ............................................................................................. 1 Swearing in of members ................................................................................................ 2 Election of Speaker ........................................................................................................ 3 Election of Chief Minister ............................................................................................. 3 Leader of the Opposition ............................................................................................... 7 Statement by member .................................................................................................. 11 Election of Deputy Speaker ......................................................................................... 13 Papers ........................................................................................................................... 13 Dates and times of next meetings ...............................................................................