DOCSLIB.ORG

Trail Signage Guidelines - City of San José Trail Program Ii Iii 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trail Signage Guidelines - City of San José Trail Program Ii Iii 1 YIELD TO PEDS CURVE Coyote Creek SAN JOSÉ TRAILS Violators subject to arrest and prosecution pursuant to California Penal Code sections DESTINATION 1.2 mi RESTROOM 602 and 602.8, and San Jose Municipal Code sections 10.20.140 and 10.20.150 Loitering forbidden by law NO TRESPASSING MAIN CAPITOL TRAIL EXPY 12’-6” HETCH-HETCHY TRAIL Lower CLEARANCE HEH Silver MILE Creek 3.25 SAN JOSÉ TRAIL TRAILS Call 9-1-1 for Emergencies TRAIL CONTINUES SIGNAGE GUIDELINES CROSS TRAFFIC CITY OF SAN JOS TRAIL PROGRAM Revised PASS LEFT KEEP RIGHT Canoas December 22, 2017 Creek SAN JOSÉ TRAILS Berryessa Creek SAN JOSÉ TRAILS CURVE Lower USE TRAFFIC SIGNAL in collaboration with Silver CALLANDER ASSOCIATES Creek SAN JOSÉ YIELD TO PEDS TRAILS BIKE ROUTE 3 Prepared by: Callander Associates Landscape Architecture Inc. 300 S. First Street, Suite 232 San José, CA 95113 Prepared for: City of San José Department of Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services Under the direction of: City of San José Department of Public Works - City Facilities Architectural Services Division Photos: Yves Zsutty, City of San Jose i Contents 1. Introduction Definitions.................................................................................................................2 How to Use This Document.................................................................................3 2. Trail Signs Trail Sign Index.........................................................................................................6 Trail Sign Details.......................................................................................................9 Trail System Name Signs.......................................................................................75 Matrix of Trail Systems, Icons, and Colors........................................................76 Trail Name Sign Details.........................................................................................80 3. Milestone Markers Network Map with “Zero” Points....................................................................120 Sample Trail System Map.....................................................................................122 Milestone Marker Details...................................................................................123 4. Acknowledgements and References Project Contributors and Acknowledgements...............................................127 References...............................................................................................................128. Appendices A - Scope Development B - Goals and Objectives C - Signage Categories and Existing Signs D - Strategies for Improvement E - Milestone Marker Deployment Strategy F - Template for Milestone Marker Documentation G - Mock Milestone Marker Deployment H - Post-Deployment Surveys I - Retroreflective Thermoplastic Pavement Striping Specifications J - Anti-Graffiti Coating Specification K - Signage and Milestone Marker Specifications L - Bollard-style Milestone Marker Details Trail Signage Guidelines - City of San José Trail Program ii iii 1. Introduction The purpose of this document is to provide the required tools for trail planners, designers, and contractors to deploy a cohesive trail signage program throughout the City of San José’s Trail Network. The City seeks to develop a 100-mile Trail Network across 40 trail systems. At this time, 60 miles are developed and 85% are paved. Throughout the development of the Trail Network, the City has consistently used best practices to support safer usage. Supporting this effort is the development of a comprehensive trail signage library with signs for common needs: regulatory, guidance, warning and custom messages such as wayfinding or points of interest. In addition, mileage markers track distances traveled and provide 911 operators the ability to quickly locate and dispatch assistance to trail users. A unique and consistent design approach will reinforce that the trails are within San José. Appendices offer background on the project’s development. Trail Signage Guidelines - City of San José Trail Program 1 Definitions Before moving forward, it is important to understand the differences between trail signage and milestone markers. Together these form the trail signage program but each is unique in purpose. Trail Signs A collection of signs are generally categorized as guidance, regulatory, or warning. Guidance signs identify the trail by name, provide wayfinding or directional information, and identify locations of destinations and amenities. Regulatory signs provide the rules and regulations as well as good behavior direction. Warning signs are very similar to traffic signs in that they alert users to changes in the trail such as curves, narrowing, cross traffic, steep grades, and areas of potential high water. This document provides a framework and the standards for customization of signs to fit site specific requirements. All signage developed for San José was influenced by existing guidelines, such as the California Highway Design Manual and the MUTCD (Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices). The document permits and guides development of custom signs for unforeseen needs. Milestone Markers Milestone markers are special signs with locational information that provide recreation benefits and enhance safety. Recreationally, users can utilize the sequentially-numbered signs to track distances traveled on their run, walk, bike or horseback ride. For safety, that same numbering system is utilized by the 911 Call Center to better locate trail users in need of assistance and to provide details on access routes to the emergency responders. This information will improve response time because the precise location of the markers will be available to the 911 call center. 2 How to Use This Document For ease of use, this guideline has been separated into three distinct chapters: 1. Trail Signs 2. Milestone Markers 3. Appendices Trail Signage Guidelines - City of San José Trail Program 3 4 2. Trail Signs Introduction At full build-out, San José will have 40 unique and interconnected trail systems forming one of the nation’s largest Trail Networks. The family of signs presented by the guidelines offer a related and unified graphic appearance and help convey data clearly. Development of the signs focused on clarity with simple graphics. Sign messages convey only one direction or instruction for readability and comprehension. And when appropriate, signs include humor or whimsy to engage trail users and reinforce the fun aspects of trails and the Department’s tag line, “Building Community Through Fun”. The Department of Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services (PRNS Trail Manager) has digital files for all signage to support new or replacement installation. Chapter At-A-Glance Trail Sign Index Trail Sign Details Individual Trail Name Signs Matrix of Trail Systems, Icons, and Colors Trail Name Sign Details Trail Signage Guidelines - City of San José Trail Program 5 Trail Sign Index This index lists each standard trail sign with its alphanumeric sign code, a description of where and why it should be used, and a thumbnail image of the sign. It provides a quick reference tool to easily identify sign types, uses,TRAIL and general SIGN locations. MATRIX November 7, 2017 Site-Specific Sign Name Sign Code Customization Where to Install Thumbnail Required Guidance Signs Trail System Name CSJ-TG1 X At all trailheads Guadalupe River SAN JOSÉ TRAILS Jurisdictional Logos CSJ-TG2 X At all trailheads that involve a partnership with other agencies or carry a special designation Intersection Street Names CSJ-TG3 X At approach to road intersection or upon bridge structure at undercrossing Bike Route Number CSJ-TG4 X At trailhead that is part of, or intersects, an officially designated bike route (refer to adopted bike plan) BIKE ROUTE Directional Arrow - Straight CSJ-TG5.1 X Directional Arrow - Right CSJ-TG5.2 X At trail intersections or splits; to identify single points of interest, neighborhoods, parks, transit connections, etc. “Destination” will be replaced with proper name. Directional Arrow - Left CSJ-TG5.3 X Trail Continues - Straight CSJ-TG6.1 TRAIL CONTINUES Trail Continues - Right CSJ-TG6.2 TRAIL CONTINUES Trail Continues - Left CSJ-TG6.3 At discontinuous portions of trail or junctions with secondary trails. To be used to identify preferred "commute" route. TRAIL CONTINUES Trail Continues - Curve Right CSJ-TG6.4 TRAIL CONTINUES Trail Continues - Curve Left CSJ-TG6.5 TRAIL CONTINUES At approach to split in trail Main and Minor Trail - Left CSJ-TG7.0A MAIN MINOR TRAIL PATH Main and Minor Trail - Right CSJ-TG7.0B At approach to split in trail MINOR MAIN PATH TRAIL Main and On-Street Route - Left CSJ-TG7.1A X At approach to split in trail for main trail and street trail MAIN TRAIL Main and On-Street Route - CSJ-TG7.1B X At approach to split in trail for main trail and street trail MAIN Right TRAIL Straight Main Trail and CSJ-TG7.2A X At approach to split in trail for main trail and street trail MAIN On-Street Route - Right TRAIL Straight Main Trail and CSJ-TG7.2B X At approach to split in trail for main trail and street trail MAIN On-Street Route - Left TRAIL Straight Main and Minor Trail - CSJ-TG7.3A At approach to split in trail MAIN MINOR Right TRAIL PATH Straight Main and Minor Trail - CSJ-TG7.3B At approach to split in trail MINOR MAIN Left PATH TRAIL At intersection with road; to direct trail user to actuate crossing Use Traffic Signal CSJ-TG8 signal to continue USE TRAFFIC SIGNAL Restroom
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NFWF Celebrates Oyster Recovery Milestone in Virginia
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Rob Blumenthal, 202-857-0166, [email protected] Mike Smith, 703-623-3834, [email protected] NFWF Celebrates Oyster Recovery Milestone in Virginia 14 Grants Totaling Almost Over $9.3 Million Awarded in Virginia Two Grants Slated to Achieve Oyster Populations that will designate Lafayette as First Fully Restored Tributary in Virginia NORFOLK (September 25, 2017) –The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced more than $12.6 million in grants to support the restoration and conservation of the Chesapeake Bay watershed in six states and the District of Columbia. The grants will generate more than $21.2 million in matching contributions for a total conservation impact of $33.8 million. The 14 projects in Virginia will leverage matching funds of $5,566,480 for a total of $9,356,586 million. The grants were awarded through the Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund (CBSF), a partnership between NFWF and the EPA’s Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Grants Program (INSR Program) and Small Watershed Grants Program (SWG Program). Additional support is provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Altria Group Restoring America’s Resources partnership and CSX. Virginia grant recipients are being recognized today at the project site of a previous grant recipient— recently completed oyster reef and areas of living shoreline at the Hermitage Museum, situated on the Lafayette River in Norfolk, Virginia. Additionally, the important work of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Tidewater will be acknowledged today by Representative Robert Scott and Governor Terry McAuliffe.
    [Show full text]
  • NH CELEBRATES 50Th ANNIVERSARY of INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM the “OPEN ROAD’ BEGAN with IKE’S SIGNATURE on JUNE 29, 1956
    NEWS RELEASE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Carol A. Murray, Commissioner For Immediate Release Contacts: Bill Boynton June 29, 2006 Public Information Office (603) 271-6495 NH CELEBRATES 50th ANNIVERSARY OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM THE “OPEN ROAD’ BEGAN WITH IKE’S SIGNATURE ON JUNE 29, 1956 One of the biggest engineering projects in history has reached the half-century mark. The New Hampshire Department of Transportation, along with the NH Good Roads th Association and the Associated General Contractors of NH, today marked the 50 anniversary of the nation’s Interstate Highway System with recognition of the milestone and a call to reinvest in this vital transportation network for New Hampshire and the entire country. “The 225 miles of Interstate highway in New Hampshire have served us well, dramatically increasing mobility, fueling our economy and making our state an even more appealing place to live and visit,” NHDOT Commissioner Carol Murray said today at a Concord event celebrating the anniversary. “It’s also a heavily used highway system rapidly approaching middle age that’s in serious need of repairs and rehabilitation.” It was on June 29, 1956 that President Dwight Eisenhower signed the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 that paved the way for the construction of an Interstate System that today totals approximately 47,000 miles. This colossal engineering challenge forever changed the way people and freight moved, putting everyone in America within a few days drive of each other and redefining the relationship between urban and rural America. By 1963, sections of Interstate 93 from Salem to Manchester and from Bow to Tilton, and I-293 from I-93 in Manchester to the Queen City Bridge were completed and opened to traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Interstate
    Building the Interstate W. L. Mertz and Joyce Ritter FOREWORD What follows is the documentation of the critical events during the building of the Interstate System. The record begins with the passage of the 1956 Highway Act, which kicked off the Interstate construction program. It ends in 1974 just after the passage of the 1973 Highway Act, which was landmark legislation for the Interstate System and the highway program in general. We made several attempts to interpret the 1973 Act for the reader but abandoned it in favor of relying on quotations from those involved at the time who said what they thought it was. An earlier document named "Origins of the Interstate" explored the critical years in the conceptualization of the Interstate System culminating in the 1956 Highway Act. Both documents rely heavily on quoted excerpts of speeches made by people who were influential in charting the course of the highway program during those years. We have found that no paraphrasing expresses the essence of the issues of the times as well as the words of those who were involved and spoke them. By far the richest source of material has been American Highways, the quarterly journal of the American Association of State Highway Officials. It faithfully recorded the views of its own members, Congressmen, Federal officials and indeed, the adversaries of the highway program. The reasons for stopping the record in 1974 are several. First, our scheduled time allotted for this task was running out. Second, the events following the 1973 Highway Act are recent history. We have been involved in that history and so are too close to it to make unbiased judgments about what should be highlighted.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Safety Act of 1973
    * * PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY STUDY Highway Safety Act of 1973 * (Section 214) Of T t ^. STATES Of a^ * MARCH 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY * ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 * PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY STUDY Highway Safety Act of 1973 (Section 214) MARCH 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 CONTENTS Page SECTION I: SYNOPSIS A. Introduction .............................................. 1 B. Executive Summary ......................................... 2 C. Background .............................................. 4 D. Study Methodology ......................................... 7 E. Congressional Recommendations ................................ 12 SECTION II: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY Introduction .............................................. 13 A. Review and Evaluation of State and Local Ordinances, Regulations, and Laws Pertaining to Pedestrian Safety .................................. 14 B. Review and Evaluation of Enforcement Policies, Procedures, Methods, Practices and Capabilities for Enforcing Pedestrian Rules ................ 35 C. Relationship Between Alcohol and Pedestrian Safety ................... 36 D. Evaluation of Ways and Means of Improving Pedestrian Safety Programs ...... 43 E. Analysis of Present Funding Allocation of Pedestrian Safety Programs and an Assessment of the Capabilities of Federal, State and Local Governments to Fund Such Activities and Programs .................... 45 F. Findings ................................................59
    [Show full text]
  • Best-In-Class in the Germantown Market
    BEST-IN-CLASS IN THE GERMANTOWN MARKET MILESTONE CENTER DRIVE | GERMANTOWN, MD | WWW.MILESTONEBUSINESSPARK.COM Discover Milestone Business Park Located just 20 miles northwest of downtown Washington DC, in Germantown, Maryland, Montgomery County’s fastest growing area, is a stunning 635,272 square foot, premier Class A office campus. Milestone Business Park is comprised of three state- of-the-art Class A office buildings, one Class A flex building, and a developable 7.64 acre parcel. Key attributes include: • Four building campus totaling 635,272 square feet • LEED certified buildings • Energy Star rated • Large and efficient floor plates with minimal columns • Premier I-270 visibility • Easy access to points north and south via I-270 at Father Hurley Boulevard and points east via the ICC • Located minutes from the Shops at Seneca Meadows, Milestone Shopping Center, and Germantown Town Center • Fitness Center • Deli with catering capabilities • New state-of-the-art 83 seat conference center • Concierge services • Campus environment with beautiful landscaped plaza, perfect for corporate and client events • Extended Stay America Hotel located adjacent to the Property • Structured and surface parking with an extraordinary parking ratio of 4 per 1,000 square feet • Future expansion possibilities Milestone Business Park is the ideal choice for tenants who value superior quality, with an unparalleled full-service approach, at a greater value. For more detailed information please visit MilestoneBusinessPark.com. Why Germantown? Germantown, the most vibrant submarket in the DC Metro region, is situated in the northwest section of Montgomery County, Maryland, north of the Capital Beltway (I-495) along Interstate 270.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Land Surveyors
    PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS Abraham, William Spero 02006 Akker, James Alan 02618 Allen, Timothy John 02625 Anglin, John Charles 02865 Universal Ensco Inc GF Young Inc Apache Louisiana Minerals Clearpoint Engineers Survey Supervisor VP/Surveying Asst. Gen. Mgr. Project Engineer 135 Sawmill Ct. 13925 Gull Way 1246 Bayou Blue Road 4741 Hwy 49 Bastrop, TX 78602- Clearwater, FL 33762-4518 Houma, LA 70364 Mt. Olive, MS 39119 (512)581-0558 (727)822-4317 (985)879-3528 (601)261-2609 Achee, Kristie Marlene 02950 Aldred Jr, Lewis Connell 01993 Allen Jr, Thomas Earl 02820 April IV, Archibald Earl 02690 Quad Knopf, Inc Aldred Surveying Co Pritchard Engineering Wink Engineering Associate Surveyor Owner Project Engineer Drafting Manager 5400 Planz Road #25 PO Box 2201 717 Park Circle 2436 Martin Road Bakersfield, CA 93309 Pascagoula, MS 39569-2201 West Point, MS 39773 Biloxi, MS 39531 (661)301-4960 (228)762-7374 (662)324-2205 (228)385-0474 Achee Jr, Lloyd Joseph 02048 Alexander, Glen Wood 02536 Alston, Kenny Lenaz 02529 Armstrong, John 02870 Jackson Cty Port Author Self Employed Self Richard Port Engineer Surveyor President Pickering Firm Inc PO Box 982 2481 Mooresville Pike 4602 Kendall Avenue Proj Surveyor/Assoc Pascagoula, MS 39568-0982 Culleoka, TN 38451 Gulfport, MS 39507 Pickering Firm Inc. (225)769-3400 (931)987-0736 (228)864-2645 6775 Lenox Ctr Court #300 Memphis, TN 38115 Adams, Jonathan Eric 02879 Alexander Jr, George 02052 Anderson, David Larry 02054 (901)726-0810 HL Foley Jr & Assoc Edward State of Mississippi Engrg Technician Alexander Engineering Dir. Bureau of Bldg. Armstrong, Scott 01919 1073 CR 261 610 Highway 44 President Douglas Blue Springs, MS 38828 Sumrall, MS 39482 346 South Gamwyn Engrg Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • WIC Developmental Milestone Checklist Program from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Developmental Milestone Checklist WIC Program Implementation Guide A Guide for Implementing the WIC Developmental Milestone Checklist Program from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention www.cdc.gov/WICGuide CS309789 Developmental Milestone Checklist WIC Program CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................1 What is Developmental Monitoring? ..................................................................................................................................2 About CDC’s Learn the Signs. Act Early. ............................................................................................................................3 How Developmental Monitoring Helps WIC Staff ....................................................................................................4 The Missouri Model ...................................................................................................................................................................5 How to Monitor Development ...............................................................................................................................................7 Identifying Program Champions ........................................................................................................................................8 Recruiting Clinics & Training Staff ......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Minneapolis Linked with Milestone Ring of Protection Pro-Tech Design Provides Innovative Inter-City Security Solution
    Milestone Customer Story 2014 Greater Minneapolis Linked with Milestone Ring of Protection Pro-Tech Design provides innovative inter-city security solution Eight cities covering more than 200 square miles around the greater Minneapolis area have formed a valuable relationship by connecting the municipalities’ video surveillance to protect citizens and quickly resolve incidents that can cross between their borders. With Milestone XProtect® video management software networked in numerous cities, individual municipalities control their own security monitoring, yet quickly connect with neighboring systems for collaborative surveillance missions. “We had a collective idea between numerous municipalities to centralize local systems with the same IT backbone. Every city can adopt software from the Milestone platform to have its own system. But there are times administrators may want to open access to their system to solve a mutual incident, and they can get assistance from neighboring emergency services, requiring as much help as possible to solve a problem. Sharing camera feeds through Milestone has been a valuable yet easy-to-integrate solution that each municipality has eagerly installed.” Tim Ferrian, Director of Sales and Marketing, Pro-Tec Design. The challenge: The greater Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, area is composed of 45 municipalities with similar citywide surveillance needs. Within that space, security integrator Pro-Tec Design identified the parallel and individual needs of each city and their various departments. For example, the police department in one city has a variety of unique applications different from the IT department of another. The widespread commonality for all cities was the need for an improved IP video management software (VMS) system to replace legacy analog systems.
    [Show full text]
  • WSDOT Project Development Glossary
    PROJECT DEVELOPMENT GLOSSARY Table of Contents PROJECT DEVELOPMENT GLOSSARY ..................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ................................................................................................ 1 A ........................................................................................................................ 1 B ........................................................................................................................ 7 C ........................................................................................................................ 10 D ........................................................................................................................ 14 E ........................................................................................................................ 16 F ........................................................................................................................ 18 G ........................................................................................................................ 21 H ........................................................................................................................ 24 I ......................................................................................................................... 27 J ......................................................................................................................... 29 K .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT MANUAL Wisconsin Department of Transportation TABLE of CONTENTS Chapter 7: Access Control
    FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT MANUAL Wisconsin Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 7: Access Control Section 7-1 Introduction 7-1-1 ........... Purpose and Benefits 1.1 ..... Originator 1.2 ..... General Section 7-5 Access Management System Plan 7-5-1 ........... General 1.1 ..... Plan Purpose 1.2 ..... The Plan 1.3 ..... Considerations and Strategies for Application of Access Management Tools Attachment 1.1 ...... Access Management System Plan Section 7-10 Methods of Control 7-10-1 ......... Overview 1.1 ..... Administrative Access Control 1.2 ..... Purchased Access Control 1.3 ..... Driveway Permitting 1.4 ..... Access Covenants 1.5 ..... Other Tools for Corridor Access Management 1.6 ..... Freeway or Expressway Designation 1.7 ..... Subdivision Review 1.8 ..... Other Land Divisions Review 1.9 ..... Scenic Easements 1.10 ... Design/Engineering Techniques Attachment 1.1 ...... Recordable Access Control Forms Attachment 1.2 ...... Access - Related Documents Section 7-15 Administrative Access Control (Control by Section 84.25) 7-15-1 ......... General 1.1 ..... Definition 1.2 ..... Application Criteria 1.3 ..... Restricting the Type of Access 1.4 ..... Access Control Along Intersecting Streets and Highways Attachment 1.1 ...... Sample Form DT2049, Resolution - Controlled Access Project 7-15-5 ......... Establishing and Altering Access Controls 5.1 ..... Establishing An 84.25 Access Control Project 5.2 ..... Altering Access on Controlled Highways 5.3 ..... Reviewing Requests and Altering Access 5.4 ..... Class 3 Notices 5.5 ..... 84.25 Controlled Access Project Unique Identifier Attachment 5.1 ...... Procedure for Establishing Access Control Projects Attachment 5.2 ...... Sample Form DT2050 Revocation - Highway Authorization Attachment 5.3 ...... Samples of Form DT2048, Controlled Access Highway Authorization Attachment 5.4 .....
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Topics and Tales: Milestones in Transportation History
    Transportation Topics and Tales: Milestones in Transportation History in Southern California By John E. Fisher, P.E. PTOE Transportation Topics and Tales Introduction hortly after I joined ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) in 1972, I purchased the ITE publica- tion, Traffic Devices, Historical Aspects, Thereof. While this publication was rich with traffic device history on the East Coast and Mid-West, there was little history regarding traffic control in the Southern California. Later, in 1987, I came across a 1937 ³ photograph of a prominent intersec- tion in Los Angeles. It was Wilshire Did you know Los An- Boulevard and Western Avenue, which geles was the home of was claimed to be the busiest intersec- the first pedestrian ac- tion in the world, with 41,000 vehi- tivated signal? cles during the peak eight hours (a µ 1929 count). Certainly, the vintage cars and well-dress shoppers of the time provided an interesting contrast with the casual look and the rela- 1971 ITE P ublication of tively indistinctive cars of today. But what really caught my eye was the Traffic Devices: Histori- traffic control–a diamond shaped Stop sign and off-center lane treat- cal Deices Thereof ment. Graphic—8094 To find out more about this intriguing traffic control, I contacted re- tired Assistant General Manager, Hugh Gilman, who had worked with pioneering Los Angeles traffic engineer, Ralph Dorsey. Gilman’s rec- ollections led me to the City archives, old magazine articles, and even- tually to a meeting with Ralph Dorsey’s son, Frank. Frank gave me his father’s 32 years of saved newspaper clippings relating to traffic con- trol, spanning the years 1922 to 1954.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestone Road Report
    Report from the Nantucket Historical Commission September 2019 Milestone Road Safety and Accessibility Improvements May 2018 Construction Plan Massachusetts Department of Transportation Highway Division Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended (36 CFR 800), all projects in a Historic District that receive State or Federal Funding are required to be reviewed by the local historic authority. The purpose of this report is to recommend adjustments to the Milestone Road Safety and Accessibility Plan, for the consideration of MassDOT and the Town and County of Nantucket, in order to preserve the scenic quality and cultural assets of Nantucket Island. Sections: I. Curbing: Change HMA to slanted granite curb II. Roadway Modifications and Signs: Balancing Safety Benefit with Visual Impact III. Q: How safe is Milestone Road? A: Relatively safe. IV. Future changes to Milestone Road: road widening vs. rumble strips V. AppendiX A: road sign inventory I. Curbing: Change HMA to slanted granite curb A total of 11 intersection sites will experience some form of modification, ranging from minor adjustments to complete redesign. 16 new bus turn-outs were constructed in spring 2019. Each of these areas require new curb. Hot miXed asphalt berm is specified for curbing. We request slanted granite be used instead. Key reasons are: • Higher quality, more enduring, attractive material • More historically appropriate material • Has been the standard for other projects, such as Milestone Rotary, at Milestone Crossing intersection, and various other intersections on Milestone Road and around Nantucket. Both photos below were taken on Milestone Road New Milestone Rd HMA curbing Example of eXisting slanted granite curbing Importantly, plans appear to call for the removal of eXisting slanted granite curbing at Milestone Crossing and other places, and to replace it with HMA Berm.
    [Show full text]