DOCSLIB.ORG

Milestone, Washington, DC. Note: Exception: Bindery Production, If Subcontracted, May Be Outside the Restricted Production Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Milestone, Washington, DC. Note: Exception: Bindery Production, If Subcontracted, May Be Outside the Restricted Production Area Specifications by kk Jackets 408-074/079/173R-1 Page 1 of 9 DLA 9-081929L/9-081919L/9-081909L Reviewed by YVB BID OPENING: December 21, 2018. BIDS SHALL BE PUBLICLY OPENED AT 11:00 A.M., PREVAILING WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME. ANY QUESTIONS BEFORE AWARD CONCERNING THESE SPECIFICATIONS CALL KEN KERNS AFTER AWARD, REFER ALL QUESTIONS TO YOUR CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR WHOSE NAME APPEARS IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE PURCHASE ORDER. (202) 512 1239. NO COLLECT CALLS. FACSIMILE BID SPECIFICATIONS U.S. Government Publishing Office (GPO) Washington, D.C. GPO CONTRACT TERMS: Any contract which results from this Invitation for Bid will be subject to the applicable provisions, clauses, and supplemental specifications of GPO Contract Terms (GPO Publication 310.2, effective December 1, 1987 (Rev. 01-18)) and GPO Contract Terms, Quality Assurance Through Attributes Program for Printing and Binding (GPO Publication 310.1, effective May 1979 (revised 8-02)). NOTE: The GPO 910 “BID” Form is no longer required. Bidders are to fill out, sign/initial, all applicable pages. BIDDERS, PLEASE NOTE: GPO has issued a new GPO Publication 310.2, GPO Contract Terms – Solicitation Provisions, Supplemental Specifications, and Contract Clauses (Rev 1-18). Prospective bidders should carefully read this publication as the applicable terms within become an integral part of this contract. The document is posted at https://www.gpo.gov/how-to-work-with-us/vendors/forms-and-standards along with a list of major revisions. RESTRICTION ON LOCATION OF PRODUCTION FACILITIES: All production facilities used in the manufacture of the products ordered under this contract must be located within a 100-mile radius of zero milestone, Washington, DC. Note: Exception: Bindery production, if subcontracted, may be outside the Restricted Production area. Any modification that results in a price change must be authorized by DLA Document Services before the contractor/vendor proceeds. Failure to obtain this authorization may result in non-payment for those modifications. SPECIFICATIONS WILL APPLY EQUALLY TO ALL JACKETS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. PRODUCT: Two (2) different Smyth-Sewn, Stamped Casebound Books and Box Slip Case. TITLE: Jacket 408-074: CMH Pub 70-129, Great War Art & Artifacts Boxed Set (Box Slip Case Construction) Jacket 408-079: CMH Pub 70-128, Great War Artifacts Jacket 408-173: CMH Pub 70-127, The Great War: U.S. Army Art QUANTITY: Jacket 408-074: 250 Box Slip Case. Jacket 408-079: 2,090 Smyth-Sewn, Stamped Casebound Books with dust jacket plus 13 QARC’s, plus one set of stamping dies. Jacket 408-173: 1,996 Smyth-Sewn, Stamped Casebound Books with dust jacket plus 13 QARC’s, plus one set of stamping dies. TOTAL: 4,086 Smyth-Sewn, Stamped Casebound Books and 250 Box Slip Cases. PAGES: Jacket 408-074: 1 image for stamping of panel 1, 2 and spine. Jacket 408-079: 160 text pages, dust jacket plus stamped cover and spine. Jacket 408-173: 174 text pages, dust jacket plus stamped cover and spine. Page 2 of 9 Jackets 408-074/079/173R-1 TRIM SIZE: Jacket 408-074: image 26-3/4 x 9-7/8” flat constructed to size suitable to hold snugly Jacket 408- 079 and Jacket 408-173 (two Smyth-Sewn casebound books). Jacket 408-079: Casebound Cover: 12-1/8 x 9-1/4”; Text 12 x 9”, bind on 9” dimension. Jacket 408-173: Casebound Cover: 12-1/8 x 9-1/4”; Text 12 x 9”, bind on 9” dimension. Jacket 408-079 and 408-173: Dust Jacket approx. 32-11/16 x 9-1/4 with 3-7/16” flaps. GOVERNMENT TO FURNISH: Three (3) DVD+R generated on a MAC or PC containing twenty-five (25) Adobe Indesign files.. GPO Form 892 (R. 12/17) Proofs GPO Form 2678 (departmental random copies-blue label). GPO Form 917 (Certificate of Selection). GPO Form 915 (Business Reply Label). GPO Form 2686 QARC Random copies sampling & shipping instructions. Contractor to download the “Labeling and Marking Specifications” form (GPO Form 905, R. 7-15) from gpo.gov, fill in appropriate blanks, and attach to shipping containers. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH: All materials and operations, other than those listed under "Government to Furnish," necessary to produce the product(s) in accordance with these specifications. Contractor must provide necessary foil stamping dies and include in total bid price. Prior to image processing, the contractor shall perform a basic check (preflight) of the furnished media and publishing files to assure correct output of the required reproduction image. Any errors, media damage, or data corruption that might interfere with proper file image processing must be reported to the contract administrator. The contractor shall create or change any necessary trapping, set proper screen angles and screen frequency, and define file output selection for the imaging device being utilized. Furnished files must be imaged as necessary to meet the assigned quality level. PROOFS: One (1) set of digital color content proofs for the entire publication of all Jackets. Direct to plate must be used to produce the final product with a minimum of 2400 x 2400 dpi. Proofs must be created using the same Raster Image Processor (RIP) that will be used to produce the product. Proofs shall be collated with all elements in proper position (not pasted up), imaged face and back, trimmed and folded to the finished size of the product. Plus One (1) set of digital one-piece composite laminated halftone proofs on the actual production stock (Kodak Approval, Polaroid PolaProof, CreoSpectrum, or Fuji Final Proof) with a minimum resolution of 2400 x 2400 dpi for entire publication for all Jackets. At contractor’s option, One (1) set of inkjet proofs that are G7 profiled and use pigment-based inks may be submitted in lieu of digital one-piece composite laminated halftone proofs. A proofing RIP that provides an option for high quality color matching such as Device Links Technology and/or ICC Profiles Technology, and meets or exceeds industry tolerance to ISO 12647-7 standard for Graphic Technology (as of 2016 and future amendments) must be utilized. Proofs must be ripped and sent at plate resolution (minimum of 2400 x 2400 dpi). If using a 1 bit tiff, the tiff must be made at a minimum of 2400 dpi. Output must be a minimum of 2400 x 1200 dpi on a GRACoL or SWOP certified proofing media. Proofs must contain both of the following to be evaluated for accuracy: 3-tier color control strip: IDEAlliance ISO 12647-7 2013(i1), and the GPO Resolution target found www.gpo.gov/gporestarget.pdf. NOTE: If a contractor chooses this proof option, prior evaluation and approval of this proofing method must be provided by GPO, Quality Control for Published Products, to ensure that the final product will be produced in accordance with contract specifications. See instructions at: https://www.gpo.gov/docs/default-source/forms-and-standards-files-for- vendors/qlsamples6f200c30b44a64308413ff00001d133d.pdf. Failure to obtain this evaluation and approval may Page 3 of 9 Jackets 408-074/079/173R-1 be cause for the job to be rejected should the final product not match the proofs for color. Proofs must contain color control bars (such as Brunner, GATF, GRETAG, or RIT) for each color of ink on the sheet. Control bars must be placed parallel to the press’s ink rollers and must show areas consisting of minimum 1/8 x 1/8” solid color patches; tint patches of 25, 50 and 75%; dot gain scale; and gray balance patches for process color (if applicable). These areas must be repeated consecutively across the sheet. The make and model number of the proofing system utilized shall be furnished with the proofs. These proofs must contain all elements, be in press configuration, and indicate margins. Proofs will be used for color match on press. Direct to plate must be used to produce the final product with a minimum of 2400 x 2400 dpi. Pantone colors must be simulated on proofs and must be proofed separately on a digital color content, overlay, or inkjet proof. Contractor to submit ink draw downs on actual production stock of Pantone colors used to produce the product. Digital color content proof shall be used to represent spot varnish. Prior to the commencement of production of the contract production quantity, the contractor shall submit to the Government, not less than 5 sample sheets of text, end leaves, binder board, headbands, foil color sample and case cover stock to be used in the production of the contract requirements. Each sample shall be 8-1/2 x 11” and must be of the kind and quality required by the specifications. The container and accompanying documentation shall be marked PAPER SAMPLES, and shall include the GPO jacket number. Cover material to be approved prior to production. Send proofs, ink draw downs, paper samples and cover materials together with the furnished media (copy, electronic files) directly to: US Army, CMH, 102 4th Ave., Bldg. 35, Room 170, Attn: Tim Mazurek (202-685-2350), Fort McNair, Washington DC 20319-5058. Contractor must call GPO Contract Compliance Section at 202-512-0520, or e-mail information to [email protected] immediately upon sending/delivering proofs and immediately upon notification that the proofs are available for pickup at the department. Proofs will be withheld not more than 5 workdays from receipt in the department to when they are made available for pickup at the department. CONTRACTOR MUST NOT PRINT PRIOR TO RECEIVING AN "OK TO PRINT". PRIOR TO PRODUCTION SAMPLES (printing/stamping required): Prior to the commencement of the stamping and bindery operations of the contract production quantity, the contractor shall submit two (2) bound/stamped construction samples of the case (printing required) for Jackets 408- 079 and 408-173 and Prior to the construction, stamping and bindery operations of the contract production quantity for Jacket 408-074 contractor shall submit two (2) fully constructed slip Cases to: U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NFWF Celebrates Oyster Recovery Milestone in Virginia
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Rob Blumenthal, 202-857-0166, [email protected] Mike Smith, 703-623-3834, [email protected] NFWF Celebrates Oyster Recovery Milestone in Virginia 14 Grants Totaling Almost Over $9.3 Million Awarded in Virginia Two Grants Slated to Achieve Oyster Populations that will designate Lafayette as First Fully Restored Tributary in Virginia NORFOLK (September 25, 2017) –The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently announced more than $12.6 million in grants to support the restoration and conservation of the Chesapeake Bay watershed in six states and the District of Columbia. The grants will generate more than $21.2 million in matching contributions for a total conservation impact of $33.8 million. The 14 projects in Virginia will leverage matching funds of $5,566,480 for a total of $9,356,586 million. The grants were awarded through the Chesapeake Bay Stewardship Fund (CBSF), a partnership between NFWF and the EPA’s Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Grants Program (INSR Program) and Small Watershed Grants Program (SWG Program). Additional support is provided by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Altria Group Restoring America’s Resources partnership and CSX. Virginia grant recipients are being recognized today at the project site of a previous grant recipient— recently completed oyster reef and areas of living shoreline at the Hermitage Museum, situated on the Lafayette River in Norfolk, Virginia. Additionally, the important work of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Tidewater will be acknowledged today by Representative Robert Scott and Governor Terry McAuliffe.
    [Show full text]
  • NH CELEBRATES 50Th ANNIVERSARY of INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM the “OPEN ROAD’ BEGAN with IKE’S SIGNATURE on JUNE 29, 1956
    NEWS RELEASE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Carol A. Murray, Commissioner For Immediate Release Contacts: Bill Boynton June 29, 2006 Public Information Office (603) 271-6495 NH CELEBRATES 50th ANNIVERSARY OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM THE “OPEN ROAD’ BEGAN WITH IKE’S SIGNATURE ON JUNE 29, 1956 One of the biggest engineering projects in history has reached the half-century mark. The New Hampshire Department of Transportation, along with the NH Good Roads th Association and the Associated General Contractors of NH, today marked the 50 anniversary of the nation’s Interstate Highway System with recognition of the milestone and a call to reinvest in this vital transportation network for New Hampshire and the entire country. “The 225 miles of Interstate highway in New Hampshire have served us well, dramatically increasing mobility, fueling our economy and making our state an even more appealing place to live and visit,” NHDOT Commissioner Carol Murray said today at a Concord event celebrating the anniversary. “It’s also a heavily used highway system rapidly approaching middle age that’s in serious need of repairs and rehabilitation.” It was on June 29, 1956 that President Dwight Eisenhower signed the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 that paved the way for the construction of an Interstate System that today totals approximately 47,000 miles. This colossal engineering challenge forever changed the way people and freight moved, putting everyone in America within a few days drive of each other and redefining the relationship between urban and rural America. By 1963, sections of Interstate 93 from Salem to Manchester and from Bow to Tilton, and I-293 from I-93 in Manchester to the Queen City Bridge were completed and opened to traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Interstate
    Building the Interstate W. L. Mertz and Joyce Ritter FOREWORD What follows is the documentation of the critical events during the building of the Interstate System. The record begins with the passage of the 1956 Highway Act, which kicked off the Interstate construction program. It ends in 1974 just after the passage of the 1973 Highway Act, which was landmark legislation for the Interstate System and the highway program in general. We made several attempts to interpret the 1973 Act for the reader but abandoned it in favor of relying on quotations from those involved at the time who said what they thought it was. An earlier document named "Origins of the Interstate" explored the critical years in the conceptualization of the Interstate System culminating in the 1956 Highway Act. Both documents rely heavily on quoted excerpts of speeches made by people who were influential in charting the course of the highway program during those years. We have found that no paraphrasing expresses the essence of the issues of the times as well as the words of those who were involved and spoke them. By far the richest source of material has been American Highways, the quarterly journal of the American Association of State Highway Officials. It faithfully recorded the views of its own members, Congressmen, Federal officials and indeed, the adversaries of the highway program. The reasons for stopping the record in 1974 are several. First, our scheduled time allotted for this task was running out. Second, the events following the 1973 Highway Act are recent history. We have been involved in that history and so are too close to it to make unbiased judgments about what should be highlighted.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Safety Act of 1973
    * * PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY STUDY Highway Safety Act of 1973 * (Section 214) Of T t ^. STATES Of a^ * MARCH 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY * ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 * PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY STUDY Highway Safety Act of 1973 (Section 214) MARCH 1975 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 CONTENTS Page SECTION I: SYNOPSIS A. Introduction .............................................. 1 B. Executive Summary ......................................... 2 C. Background .............................................. 4 D. Study Methodology ......................................... 7 E. Congressional Recommendations ................................ 12 SECTION II: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY Introduction .............................................. 13 A. Review and Evaluation of State and Local Ordinances, Regulations, and Laws Pertaining to Pedestrian Safety .................................. 14 B. Review and Evaluation of Enforcement Policies, Procedures, Methods, Practices and Capabilities for Enforcing Pedestrian Rules ................ 35 C. Relationship Between Alcohol and Pedestrian Safety ................... 36 D. Evaluation of Ways and Means of Improving Pedestrian Safety Programs ...... 43 E. Analysis of Present Funding Allocation of Pedestrian Safety Programs and an Assessment of the Capabilities of Federal, State and Local Governments to Fund Such Activities and Programs .................... 45 F. Findings ................................................59
    [Show full text]
  • Best-In-Class in the Germantown Market
    BEST-IN-CLASS IN THE GERMANTOWN MARKET MILESTONE CENTER DRIVE | GERMANTOWN, MD | WWW.MILESTONEBUSINESSPARK.COM Discover Milestone Business Park Located just 20 miles northwest of downtown Washington DC, in Germantown, Maryland, Montgomery County’s fastest growing area, is a stunning 635,272 square foot, premier Class A office campus. Milestone Business Park is comprised of three state- of-the-art Class A office buildings, one Class A flex building, and a developable 7.64 acre parcel. Key attributes include: • Four building campus totaling 635,272 square feet • LEED certified buildings • Energy Star rated • Large and efficient floor plates with minimal columns • Premier I-270 visibility • Easy access to points north and south via I-270 at Father Hurley Boulevard and points east via the ICC • Located minutes from the Shops at Seneca Meadows, Milestone Shopping Center, and Germantown Town Center • Fitness Center • Deli with catering capabilities • New state-of-the-art 83 seat conference center • Concierge services • Campus environment with beautiful landscaped plaza, perfect for corporate and client events • Extended Stay America Hotel located adjacent to the Property • Structured and surface parking with an extraordinary parking ratio of 4 per 1,000 square feet • Future expansion possibilities Milestone Business Park is the ideal choice for tenants who value superior quality, with an unparalleled full-service approach, at a greater value. For more detailed information please visit MilestoneBusinessPark.com. Why Germantown? Germantown, the most vibrant submarket in the DC Metro region, is situated in the northwest section of Montgomery County, Maryland, north of the Capital Beltway (I-495) along Interstate 270.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Land Surveyors
    PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS Abraham, William Spero 02006 Akker, James Alan 02618 Allen, Timothy John 02625 Anglin, John Charles 02865 Universal Ensco Inc GF Young Inc Apache Louisiana Minerals Clearpoint Engineers Survey Supervisor VP/Surveying Asst. Gen. Mgr. Project Engineer 135 Sawmill Ct. 13925 Gull Way 1246 Bayou Blue Road 4741 Hwy 49 Bastrop, TX 78602- Clearwater, FL 33762-4518 Houma, LA 70364 Mt. Olive, MS 39119 (512)581-0558 (727)822-4317 (985)879-3528 (601)261-2609 Achee, Kristie Marlene 02950 Aldred Jr, Lewis Connell 01993 Allen Jr, Thomas Earl 02820 April IV, Archibald Earl 02690 Quad Knopf, Inc Aldred Surveying Co Pritchard Engineering Wink Engineering Associate Surveyor Owner Project Engineer Drafting Manager 5400 Planz Road #25 PO Box 2201 717 Park Circle 2436 Martin Road Bakersfield, CA 93309 Pascagoula, MS 39569-2201 West Point, MS 39773 Biloxi, MS 39531 (661)301-4960 (228)762-7374 (662)324-2205 (228)385-0474 Achee Jr, Lloyd Joseph 02048 Alexander, Glen Wood 02536 Alston, Kenny Lenaz 02529 Armstrong, John 02870 Jackson Cty Port Author Self Employed Self Richard Port Engineer Surveyor President Pickering Firm Inc PO Box 982 2481 Mooresville Pike 4602 Kendall Avenue Proj Surveyor/Assoc Pascagoula, MS 39568-0982 Culleoka, TN 38451 Gulfport, MS 39507 Pickering Firm Inc. (225)769-3400 (931)987-0736 (228)864-2645 6775 Lenox Ctr Court #300 Memphis, TN 38115 Adams, Jonathan Eric 02879 Alexander Jr, George 02052 Anderson, David Larry 02054 (901)726-0810 HL Foley Jr & Assoc Edward State of Mississippi Engrg Technician Alexander Engineering Dir. Bureau of Bldg. Armstrong, Scott 01919 1073 CR 261 610 Highway 44 President Douglas Blue Springs, MS 38828 Sumrall, MS 39482 346 South Gamwyn Engrg Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Signage Guidelines - City of San José Trail Program Ii Iii 1
    YIELD TO PEDS CURVE Coyote Creek SAN JOSÉ TRAILS Violators subject to arrest and prosecution pursuant to California Penal Code sections DESTINATION 1.2 mi RESTROOM 602 and 602.8, and San Jose Municipal Code sections 10.20.140 and 10.20.150 Loitering forbidden by law NO TRESPASSING MAIN CAPITOL TRAIL EXPY 12’-6” HETCH-HETCHY TRAIL Lower CLEARANCE HEH Silver MILE Creek 3.25 SAN JOSÉ TRAIL TRAILS Call 9-1-1 for Emergencies TRAIL CONTINUES SIGNAGE GUIDELINES CROSS TRAFFIC CITY OF SAN JOS TRAIL PROGRAM Revised PASS LEFT KEEP RIGHT Canoas December 22, 2017 Creek SAN JOSÉ TRAILS Berryessa Creek SAN JOSÉ TRAILS CURVE Lower USE TRAFFIC SIGNAL in collaboration with Silver CALLANDER ASSOCIATES Creek SAN JOSÉ YIELD TO PEDS TRAILS BIKE ROUTE 3 Prepared by: Callander Associates Landscape Architecture Inc. 300 S. First Street, Suite 232 San José, CA 95113 Prepared for: City of San José Department of Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services Under the direction of: City of San José Department of Public Works - City Facilities Architectural Services Division Photos: Yves Zsutty, City of San Jose i Contents 1. Introduction Definitions.................................................................................................................2 How to Use This Document.................................................................................3 2. Trail Signs Trail Sign Index.........................................................................................................6 Trail Sign Details.......................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • WIC Developmental Milestone Checklist Program from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Developmental Milestone Checklist WIC Program Implementation Guide A Guide for Implementing the WIC Developmental Milestone Checklist Program from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention www.cdc.gov/WICGuide CS309789 Developmental Milestone Checklist WIC Program CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................1 What is Developmental Monitoring? ..................................................................................................................................2 About CDC’s Learn the Signs. Act Early. ............................................................................................................................3 How Developmental Monitoring Helps WIC Staff ....................................................................................................4 The Missouri Model ...................................................................................................................................................................5 How to Monitor Development ...............................................................................................................................................7 Identifying Program Champions ........................................................................................................................................8 Recruiting Clinics & Training Staff ......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Minneapolis Linked with Milestone Ring of Protection Pro-Tech Design Provides Innovative Inter-City Security Solution
    Milestone Customer Story 2014 Greater Minneapolis Linked with Milestone Ring of Protection Pro-Tech Design provides innovative inter-city security solution Eight cities covering more than 200 square miles around the greater Minneapolis area have formed a valuable relationship by connecting the municipalities’ video surveillance to protect citizens and quickly resolve incidents that can cross between their borders. With Milestone XProtect® video management software networked in numerous cities, individual municipalities control their own security monitoring, yet quickly connect with neighboring systems for collaborative surveillance missions. “We had a collective idea between numerous municipalities to centralize local systems with the same IT backbone. Every city can adopt software from the Milestone platform to have its own system. But there are times administrators may want to open access to their system to solve a mutual incident, and they can get assistance from neighboring emergency services, requiring as much help as possible to solve a problem. Sharing camera feeds through Milestone has been a valuable yet easy-to-integrate solution that each municipality has eagerly installed.” Tim Ferrian, Director of Sales and Marketing, Pro-Tec Design. The challenge: The greater Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, area is composed of 45 municipalities with similar citywide surveillance needs. Within that space, security integrator Pro-Tec Design identified the parallel and individual needs of each city and their various departments. For example, the police department in one city has a variety of unique applications different from the IT department of another. The widespread commonality for all cities was the need for an improved IP video management software (VMS) system to replace legacy analog systems.
    [Show full text]
  • WSDOT Project Development Glossary
    PROJECT DEVELOPMENT GLOSSARY Table of Contents PROJECT DEVELOPMENT GLOSSARY ..................................................................... 1 Table of Contents ................................................................................................ 1 A ........................................................................................................................ 1 B ........................................................................................................................ 7 C ........................................................................................................................ 10 D ........................................................................................................................ 14 E ........................................................................................................................ 16 F ........................................................................................................................ 18 G ........................................................................................................................ 21 H ........................................................................................................................ 24 I ......................................................................................................................... 27 J ......................................................................................................................... 29 K .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT MANUAL Wisconsin Department of Transportation TABLE of CONTENTS Chapter 7: Access Control
    FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT MANUAL Wisconsin Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 7: Access Control Section 7-1 Introduction 7-1-1 ........... Purpose and Benefits 1.1 ..... Originator 1.2 ..... General Section 7-5 Access Management System Plan 7-5-1 ........... General 1.1 ..... Plan Purpose 1.2 ..... The Plan 1.3 ..... Considerations and Strategies for Application of Access Management Tools Attachment 1.1 ...... Access Management System Plan Section 7-10 Methods of Control 7-10-1 ......... Overview 1.1 ..... Administrative Access Control 1.2 ..... Purchased Access Control 1.3 ..... Driveway Permitting 1.4 ..... Access Covenants 1.5 ..... Other Tools for Corridor Access Management 1.6 ..... Freeway or Expressway Designation 1.7 ..... Subdivision Review 1.8 ..... Other Land Divisions Review 1.9 ..... Scenic Easements 1.10 ... Design/Engineering Techniques Attachment 1.1 ...... Recordable Access Control Forms Attachment 1.2 ...... Access - Related Documents Section 7-15 Administrative Access Control (Control by Section 84.25) 7-15-1 ......... General 1.1 ..... Definition 1.2 ..... Application Criteria 1.3 ..... Restricting the Type of Access 1.4 ..... Access Control Along Intersecting Streets and Highways Attachment 1.1 ...... Sample Form DT2049, Resolution - Controlled Access Project 7-15-5 ......... Establishing and Altering Access Controls 5.1 ..... Establishing An 84.25 Access Control Project 5.2 ..... Altering Access on Controlled Highways 5.3 ..... Reviewing Requests and Altering Access 5.4 ..... Class 3 Notices 5.5 ..... 84.25 Controlled Access Project Unique Identifier Attachment 5.1 ...... Procedure for Establishing Access Control Projects Attachment 5.2 ...... Sample Form DT2050 Revocation - Highway Authorization Attachment 5.3 ...... Samples of Form DT2048, Controlled Access Highway Authorization Attachment 5.4 .....
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Topics and Tales: Milestones in Transportation History
    Transportation Topics and Tales: Milestones in Transportation History in Southern California By John E. Fisher, P.E. PTOE Transportation Topics and Tales Introduction hortly after I joined ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) in 1972, I purchased the ITE publica- tion, Traffic Devices, Historical Aspects, Thereof. While this publication was rich with traffic device history on the East Coast and Mid-West, there was little history regarding traffic control in the Southern California. Later, in 1987, I came across a 1937 ³ photograph of a prominent intersec- tion in Los Angeles. It was Wilshire Did you know Los An- Boulevard and Western Avenue, which geles was the home of was claimed to be the busiest intersec- the first pedestrian ac- tion in the world, with 41,000 vehi- tivated signal? cles during the peak eight hours (a µ 1929 count). Certainly, the vintage cars and well-dress shoppers of the time provided an interesting contrast with the casual look and the rela- 1971 ITE P ublication of tively indistinctive cars of today. But what really caught my eye was the Traffic Devices: Histori- traffic control–a diamond shaped Stop sign and off-center lane treat- cal Deices Thereof ment. Graphic—8094 To find out more about this intriguing traffic control, I contacted re- tired Assistant General Manager, Hugh Gilman, who had worked with pioneering Los Angeles traffic engineer, Ralph Dorsey. Gilman’s rec- ollections led me to the City archives, old magazine articles, and even- tually to a meeting with Ralph Dorsey’s son, Frank. Frank gave me his father’s 32 years of saved newspaper clippings relating to traffic con- trol, spanning the years 1922 to 1954.
    [Show full text]