DOCSLIB.ORG

Design & Connect

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design & Connect Delivering 300,000 SF | First Phase Summer 2018 DESIGN & CONNECT www.AssemblyAtNorthFirst.com (as-sem-bly, /e’semble/) a. A gathering together of people b. The putting together of machinery Mission Statement: MISSION STATEMENT Offer a state of the art work environment that encourages maximum worker productivity. Assembly is a 27-acre low density, sustainable campus, which combines walkable access to offsite retail, hotel and residential amenities; state of the art office and R&D workspaces; andThe Grove, a one-acre amenity-rich environment designed to maximize workforce productivity. Assembly is responsive to the needs of today’s technology tenants. It offers flexible and programmed spaces designed to foster collaboration for groups of different sizes and disciplines, through delivery of extraordinary buildings, private porches and well landscaped and merchandised outdoor spaces. Assembly acknowledges that its tenants’ campus needs will change over time and is designed to satisfy this need, indoors and in common areas. PROJECT OVERVIEW THE SPACE THE GROVE TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE THE LOCATION DESIGN & CONNECT THE SPACE THE GROVE THE LOCATION Leading edge design by Gensler, One acre of flexibly programmed Immediate pedestrian friendly offering large floor plates, abundant amenity space is the backbone access to premium shopping, natural light, high ceilings, LEED Gold of the campus dining, living to attract and retain Core & Shell 3,000 SF+ of Indoor/Outdoor fitness the best workforce With 90k SF to 1.3MM SF+, center with locker room facilities Proximate to the entire Silicon Valley Assembly will accommodate Several outdoor eating and via immediate 237 East / West access your growth needs gathering areas featuring BBQ 1,000 lineal feet of frontage, directly Distinctive, signature lobbies and grills, pizza ovens and fire pit on North First Street creates high PROJECT OVERVIEW Main Street to feature your visibility for your corporate identity corporate identity Option A: Repositioning - Plan Diagram Rose Orchard Way 3950 N. 1st St 46,285 sf 1 story 3940 N. 1st St 60,720 sf Phase 2 90 HQ Dr 1 story 81,998 sf 2 story Headquarters Dr Porch Existing Amenity 3960 N. 1st St T Existing Amenity Porch Loading Porch Amenity S Porch S Back Back Main Main Door Door Lobby Lobby Oce Space Loading Loading Amenity T 3930 N. 1st St Porch 84,240 sf 3970 N. 1st St 1 story Circulation Path Phase 1 Support S T FITNESS CENTER T S Amenity 4000 N. 1st St MAIN LOBBY 109,048 sf 102,463 sf Main 1 story 2 storyLOADING Lobby CONNECTOR N North 1st Street 3950 3940 09.28.2016 PHASE 2 90 46,285 SF PHASE 1 60,720 SF 81,998 SF 3930 3960 86,243 SF 4000 98,674 SF 115,174 SF PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT 27 Acres | 3 Architecturally distinct buildings | 1 Full acre of amenity space | Main Street FLOOR PLATES HEIGHT & LIGHT CORPORATE IDENTITY 50,000 to 100,000 SF floor Abundant natural light achieved All buildings offer distinctive, plates in single and two-story via new full height glass and prominent lobbies and multiple configurations foster collaboration ceiling heights ranging from signage opportunities to feature THE SPACE and increase workforce interaction 18’ to 22’ your corporate identity CONNECT THE SPACE EXCHANGE THE SPACE DESIGN THE SPACE SHAPE THE SPACE THE GROVE is a one acre contiguous, car free area that extends 500’ in length (greater than the size of a football field) and sets the standard today for “Work Lifestyle” in the Silicon Valley. POTENTIAL ON-SITE SERVICES: Concierge-style attention for your workforce means dining options from morning to evening, laundry pick up, bike storage, car wash, and car fueling Morning breakfast service offering freshly pressed juices, roasted coffee and herbal teas all made to order Afternoon beverage service and fresh, healthy snacks to keep the team focused and nearby Host your next company event at The Grove by reserving selected areas/cooking stations and letting us handle your party or meeting setup/breakdown OUTDOORS: Distinct zones for the individual seeking quiet outdoor workspace, group breakout areas under trees, fire pits for collaboration A comprehensive kitchen and trellis-covered patio (seating for 80) Stay productive anywhere at The Grove with complimentary high speed WiFi ON-SITE FITNESS: 2,200 SF Indoor Fitness Center fully equipped with the latest cardio machines, weights and training equipment 650 SF Outdoor Fitness/Yoga deck New men’s and women’s locker rooms, shower facilities and towel service THE GROVE LEGEND Assembly - Amenity Area Enlargement A The Gallery : Under counter refrigerators, grills in island, storage, picnic tables, overhead shade structure and market lighting B The Lounge : Concrete re pit in crushed stone paving C The Garden : Adirondack chairs in small rooms on crushed stone paving a day in the life of THE GROVE D The Stage : Wood deck with casual Seating E Fitness Porch (15' x 50') 6:00AM: The Grill : BBQ, large umbrellas, tables, and chairs on • and open F FITNESS CENTER Yoga Deck crushed stone paving (20' x 30') Fitness Center is 2,200 SF | Yoga Deck is 650 SF B A D G Assembly Walk 7:00AM 11:30AM: • Yoga Classes open H "O-The-Grid" Food Truck Plaza C • Coffee, Smoothies and Continental Breakfast at the GALLERY J Assembly Plaza E Pizza ovens and casual seating on crushed stone paving 11:30AM 1:30PM K : (30' x 60') • Lunch at the OFF-THE-GRID FOOD TRUCK PLAZA or Catered at the GALLERY L EVA Access (26' width) and Patio or at the GRILL Pizza Oven THE GALLERY THE GARDEN M 3960 Amenity Space Porch 5:00PM 7:00PM: Under counter refrigerators, Adirondack chairs in at the or the F grills in island, storage, picnic small rooms on crushed • Private events GALLERY STAGE tables, overhead shade stone paving N Pedestrian walk to retail center (10' wide) structure and market lighting 3960 THE STAGE THE LOUNGE Wood deck with casual seating Concrete fire pit in crushed stone paving N “OFF-THE-GRID” FOOD TRUCK FITNESS CENTER PLAZA M DECK ASSEMBLY PLAZA D THE GRILL BBQ, large umbrellas, tables, and chairs on 3930 crushed stone paving H PEDESTRIAN WALK Retail center next door THE GROVE 3960 AMENITY 4000 SPACE PORCH J 0 40 80' 3970 1" = 40' at full size (11 x 17") Invesco Meeting 02.03.2017 DESIGN FEATURES WORK Meet or relax in a unique environment Wide range of amenities include Several areas are designed with elements of luxury residential and fire pits, BBQ grills, wood stage, for group meetings or just resort properties integrated into fitness area, lawns, food truck relaxation space, to keep THE GROVE a office setting to create a tranquil plaza, electric car charging workers engaged with each ambiance throughout the campus other and close to work REJUVENATE THE GROVE Option A: Repositioning - Plan Diagram Rose Orchard Way 3950 N. 1st St 46,285 sf 1 story 3940 N. 1st St 60,720 sf Phase 2 90 HQ Dr 1 story 81,998 sf 2 story Headquarters Dr Porch Existing Amenity 3960 N. 1st St T Existing Amenity Porch Loading Porch Amenity S Porch S Back Back Main Main Door Door Lobby Lobby Oce Space Loading Loading Amenity T 3930 N. 1st St Porch 84,240 sf 3970 N. 1st St 1 story Circulation Path Phase 1 Support S T T S Amenity 4000 N. 1st St 109,048 sf 102,463 sf Main 1 story 2 story Lobby N North 1st Street 09.28.2016 237 SHOPPING & DINING VISTA MONTAÑAPARK Immediate pedestrian friendly access to shopping, dining & living keeps your work force close THE LOCATION THE Option A: Repositioning - Plan Diagram Rose Orchard Way 3950 N. 1st St 46,285 sf 1 story 3940 N. 1st St 60,720 sf Phase 2 90 HQ Dr 1 story 81,998 sf 2 story Headquarters Dr Porch Existing Amenity 3960 N. 1st St T Existing Amenity Porch Loading Porch Amenity S Porch S Back Back Main Main Door Door Lobby Lobby Oce Space Loading Loading Amenity T 3930 N. 1st St Porch 84,240 sf 3970 N. 1st St 1 story Circulation Path Phase 1 Support S T T S Amenity 4000 N. 1st St 109,048 sf 102,463 sf Main 1 story 2 story Lobby N North 1st Street 680 09.28.2016 BART Milpitas Station GREAT MALL . d v l B y h t r a 880 C c M VTA Light Rail Montague Station VTA Light Rail Baypointe Station VTA Light Rail Tasman Station Zanker Rd. N. First St. 87 VTA Light Rail Champion Station L Montague Expy. IONA Lafayette St. AT RT SAN JOSE AIRPO LEVI’STADIUM INTERN S . y 237 w Amtrak/Ace k GREAT P Great America Station a c i r AMERICA e m A t a e r G Tasman Dr. Scott Blvd. Expy. Tomas San 101 Caltrain/Amtrak/Ace entral Expy. Santa Clara Station C Lawrence Expy. Lawrence N. Mathilda Ave. Mathilda N. Caltrain Excellent access to all local and regional transportation options Lawrence Station THE LOCATION THE 880 444 Dwelling Units 554 183 240 2,700 1,579 293 1,750 438 Project/Development 769 1. Domain Apartments 9,654 2. Tasman Apartments Option A: R 3. Enso Apartments epositioning - Plan Diagram 4. 121 Tasman Apartments 5. The Verdant / Latitude Apartments 704 Rose Orchard Way 6. North Park Apartment Village 7. Brandon Park Apartments 8. Aire Apartments 9. Crescent Village Apartments 11 10. Verona Apartments 10 11. Epic Apartments Total: 769 Units Epic Apartments 3950 N. 1st St 438 Units 46,285 sf Verona Apartments 1 story 3940 N. 1st St 60,720 sf Phase 2 1 story 90 HQ Dr 4 81,998 sf 5 2 story Headquarters Dr 240 Units 704 Units 8 121 Tasman Apartments Porch The Verdant/Latitude Apartments 293 Units Existing Aire Apartments Amenity 3960 N.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
    Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • BLUE LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    BLUE LINE light rail time schedule & line map Baypointe View In Website Mode The BLUE LINE light rail line (Baypointe) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Baypointe: 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM (2) Virginia: 12:16 AM - 11:33 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest BLUE LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next BLUE LINE light rail arriving. Direction: Baypointe BLUE LINE light rail Time Schedule 17 stops Baypointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:30 AM - 10:20 PM Monday Not Operational Virginia Station West Virginia Street, San Jose Tuesday Not Operational Children's Discovery Museum Station Wednesday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM Convention Center Station Thursday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM 300 Almaden Bl, San Jose Friday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM San Antonio Station Saturday 12:29 AM - 11:47 PM 200 S 1st St, San Jose Santa Clara Station Fountain Alley, San Jose BLUE LINE light rail Info Saint James Station Direction: Baypointe Stops: 17 Japantown/Ayer Station Trip Duration: 33 min 15 Hawthorne Way, San Jose Line Summary: Virginia Station, Children's Discovery Museum Station, Convention Center Station, San Civic Center Station Antonio Station, Santa Clara Station, Saint James 800 North 1st Street, San Jose Station, Japantown/Ayer Station, Civic Center Station, Gish Station, Metro/Airport Station, Karina Gish Station Court Station, Component Station, Bonaventura North 1st Street, San Jose Station, Orchard Station, River Oaks Station, Tasman Station, Baypointe Station Metro/Airport Station 1740 North First
    [Show full text]
  • VTA FY2006 and FY2007 Adopted Budget
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ADOPTED BIENNIAL BUDGET June 2, 2005 FISCAL YEARS 2006 and 2007 July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2005 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Joe Pirzynski Cindy Chavez Chairperson Vice Chairperson VTA Board of Directors VTA Board of Directors Council Member Vice Mayor Town of Los Gatos City of San Jos e Nora Campos David Casas Dean Chu David Cortese Don Gage Council Member Mayor Mayor Council Member Supervisor City of San Jose City of Los Altos City of Sunnyvale City of San Jose County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors Ron Gonzales Liz Kniss Robert Livengood Jamie Matthews Forrest Williams Mayor Chairperson Council Member Council Member Council Member City of San Jose County of Santa Clara City of Milpitas City of Santa Clara City of San Jose Board of Supervisors BOARD MEMBER ALTERNATES Dennis Kennedy Breene Kerr Pete McHugh Dolly Sandoval Ken Yeager Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Supervisor Council Member Council Member City of Morgan Hill Town of Los Altos Hills County of Santa Clara City of Cupertino City of San Jose Board of Supervisors EX-OFFICIO James Beall, Jr. John McLemore Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Vice Chairperson Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) FISCAL RESOURCES STAFF Susan M. Stark Roger Contreras Jim McCutchen Cont roller Chief Financial Officer Budget Manager Christine Huynh Pauline Man Linda Schwartz Jessica Tran Vannak Uong Budget Depart ment Budget Depart ment Budget Depart ment Budget Depart ment Budget Depart ment Updated as of December 14, 2005 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ADOPTED BIENNIAL BUDGET ~ FISCAL YEARS 2006 and 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page General Manager’s Budget Message .
    [Show full text]
  • Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful
    Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq..
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose Campus Map Rev2-9 Pg1.Ai
    N San Jose Main Campus MR-3 W E MR-1 McCarthy Ranch S 237 680 . Dr B a 237 lew r Bel ber r. M D c Ln C 24 . nology a 237 ch r ters t r D h Headqua r. Te y y a 23 B Dr. W Z M l r s v 25 e r an u r. Site 5 r D d lg e p t . ke h o r groM mac a y u 880 H r S 21 u r R q a 22 R n ad d c 20 B . h He . Al a y R de r d r ber aW egdi aW D N . r . 1 y Renais sanc a . kw 3 . r e n F P 6 32 31 D L D i 4 5 n r. ta rst e a n n S nt 2 30 m r. o t 7 s A . oi a lderD M p Site 4 28 T a y E d 29 e t a Ta E s 9 11 s i m I B 8 an Site 5.1 V J 10 12 D 680 . r. W Tasm r. a D Center Rd. n K an D Site 2 m H r. as Cisc 15 20 c Z G F Champion Ct. T CYS r. E L E a e D b n 13 16 or 880 P k o m . a B r. r e c a D W y a D r 17 S B D n e r R a a O b M C m nt u W as y Site 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Grading California's Rail Transit Sta on Areas Appendix LEGEND
    ! Grading California's Rail Transit Sta3on Areas Appendix LEGEND: CONTENTS: Group 1 - Residen<al • BART Final Scores • LA Metro Final Scores Group 2 - Mixed • Sacramento RT Final Scores • San Diego MTS Final Scores • San Francisco MUNI Final Scores Group 3 - Employment • Santa Clara VTA Final Scores A+ 95% A 80% A- 75% B+ 70% B 55% B- 50% C+ 45% C 30% C- 25% D+ 20% D 5% D- 2% F below 2% Appendix | www.next10.org/transit-scorecard Next 10 ! BART FINAL SCORES AVERAGE: C Final City Line Sta3on Raw Score Grade San SFO-MILLBRAE Civic Center/UN Plaza BART 90.60 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Montgomery St. BART 88.20 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE 24th St. Mission BART 87.30 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE 16th St. Mission BART 84.30 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Powell St. BART 84.10 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Embarcadero BART 83.80 A Francisco Oakland FREMONT Lake Merri] BART 77.60 A DUBLIN/PLEASANTON Berkeley Downtown Berkeley BART 74.50 A TO DALY CITY Berkeley RICHMOND Ashby BART 75.30 A- Berkeley RICHMOND North Berkeley BART 74.30 A- San SFO-MILLBRAE Glen Park BART 74.10 A- Francisco Oakland FREMONT Fruitvale BART 73.50 A- Oakland SFO-MILLBRAE 19th St. Oakland BART 72.90 B+ San SFO-MILLBRAE Balboa Park BART 69.80 B+ Francisco 12th St. Oakland City Center Oakland SFO-MILLBRAE 71.70 B BART Contra Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Costa SFO-MILLBRAE 66.20 B Centre BART Centre Appendix | www.next10.org/transit-scorecard Next 10 ! Oakland PITTSBURG/BAY POINT MacArthur BART 65.70 B Fremont FREMONT Fremont BART 64.20 B El Cerrito RICHMOND El Cerrito Plaza
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara Valley Transportation
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination .................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule .............................................................................................. 3 - 9 Supplementary Information: Program Summaries ............................................................................... 10 - 31 Walnut Creek 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 750 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 925.274.0190 Sacramento Oakland LA/Century City Newport Beach San Diego 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee San Jose, California Seattle INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program (2000 Measure A Program), an activity of VTA, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The financial activity
    [Show full text]
  • A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’S Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report ................................................................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule ............................................................................................ 3 - 10 Supplementary Information – Program Summaries ............................................................................. 11 - 30 Supplementary Information – 2000 Measure A Ballot ........................................................................ 31 - 33 Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee 3331 North First Street San Jose, California 95134 We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program (2000 Measure A Program), an activity of VTA, for the year ended June 30, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    GREEN LINE light rail time schedule & line map Old Ironsides - Winchester View In Website Mode The GREEN LINE light rail line (Old Ironsides - Winchester) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Baypointe Station (E): 10:16 PM (2) Civic Center Station (N): 12:36 AM - 11:43 PM (3) Old Ironsides Station (W): 5:59 AM - 10:46 PM (4) San Jose Diridon: 5:27 AM - 11:49 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest GREEN LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next GREEN LINE light rail arriving. Direction: Baypointe Station (E) GREEN LINE light rail Time Schedule 17 stops Baypointe Station (E) Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday Not Operational Diridon Station Tuesday Not Operational San Fernando Station 415 San Fernando St, San Jose Wednesday 10:16 PM Convention Center Station Thursday 10:16 PM 300 Almaden Bl, San Jose Friday 10:16 PM San Antonio Station Saturday Not Operational 200 S 1st St, San Jose Santa Clara Station Fountain Alley, San Jose GREEN LINE light rail Info Saint James Station Direction: Baypointe Station (E) Stops: 17 Japantown/Ayer Station Trip Duration: 34 min 15 Hawthorne Way, San Jose Line Summary: Diridon Station, San Fernando Station, Convention Center Station, San Antonio Civic Center Station Station, Santa Clara Station, Saint James Station, 800 North 1st Street, San Jose Japantown/Ayer Station, Civic Center Station, Gish Station, Metro/Airport Station, Karina Court Station, Gish Station Component Station, Bonaventura Station, Orchard North 1st Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix! DRAFT TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN for a New San Francisco 49Ers Stadium in Santa Clara, CA
    Appendix! DRAFT TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN for a New San Francisco 49ers Stadium in Santa Clara, CA DMJM HARRIS I AECOM Draft of July 13, 2009 Transportation Plan for a New San Francisco 49ers Stadium in Santa Clara, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................•..............•.•....•..............•....................•.. 1 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK ......................................... 1 2.1 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK ............................................................. 1 2.2 EXISTING TRANSIT NETWORK ............................................................... .4 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........•• 9 3.1 HISTORICAL CANDLESTICK POINT OPERATIONS ................................. 9 3.2 TRIP ORIGINS AND DESTINATIONS ...................................................... 11 3.3 EMPLOYEES ............................................................................................. 13 3.4 OTHER NFL STADIUMS ........................................................................... 14 4.0 STADIUM TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN •...................... 16 4.1 TRANSIT .................................................................................................... 16 4.1.1 TRANSIT SERVICES ............................................................... 16 4.1.2 FACILITIES AND OPERATION ............................................... 19 4.2 MODAL SPLIT ........................................................................................... 24 4.3 PARKING ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’S Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination .................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule ..............................................................................................3 - 8 Program Summaries...............................................................................................................................9 - 27 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee San Jose, California INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program (2000 Measure A Program), an activity of VTA, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The financial activity of the 2000 Measure A Program is included in the accompanying Budgetary Comparison Schedule and related notes. Management is responsible
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara Valley Transportation
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination .................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule ............................................................................................ 3 - 10 Supplementary Information – Program Summaries ............................................................................. 11 - 30 Supplementary Information – 2000 Measure A Ballot ........................................................................ 31 - 33 Century City Los Angeles Newport Beach Oakland Sacramento San Diego Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination San Francisco Walnut Creek 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee Woodland Hills 3331 North First Street San Jose, California 95134 We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement
    [Show full text]