DOCSLIB.ORG

CWC FY2018 Comprehensive Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CWC FY2018 Comprehensive Annual Report 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PUBLIC Fiscal Year 2018 (July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018) Table of Contents 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program 2000 Measure A Transit In November 2000, Santa Clara County voters approved Measure A, a Improvement Program 30-year half cent sales tax dedicated to enhancing the public transit Description.................................i system in the county. The ballot listed specific projects with VTA as the implementing agency. The VTA Board of Directors is responsible for CWC Finding..............................i implementation of the Measure A Program and for all policy-related decisions including the composition, implementation schedule and 2000 Measure A funding level of projects. The ballot designated the Citizens Watchdog Expenditures.............................ii Committee (CWC) as the independent oversight body for Measure A tax dollar expenditures. Collection of the 2000 Measure A sales tax CWC Activities ..........................ii began on April 1, 2006 and will continue through March 31, 2036. Compliance Audit..................... iii VTA delivers transportation solutions that are critical to the health, vitality, prosperity and quality of life for those who live, work, study or Project description and end of play in Santa Clara County. This commitment can be seen in VTA’s Fiscal Year 2018 status of successful implementation of Measure A. Although most of the ballot- individual 2000 Measure A defined projects are massive and very complex, requiring years to plan, projects....................................11 design and construct, VTA has delivered significant results during the first 12 years of the 30-year program. For more information, please visit www.vta.org The accomplishments are summarized in the project section of the report. The CWC also prepared a brief summary report highlighting a few key milestones achieved during Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 (July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018) and how Measure A projects are enhancing the quality of life for residents, commuters, businesses and workers in Santa Clara County. This report, Benefits and Key Achievements, is available at: bit.ly/cwc-achievements-fy18 CITIZENS WATCHDOG COMMITTEE FINDING The CWC concludes that the 2000 Measure A tax dollars were spent in accordance with the intent of the Measure for FY 2018. 1907-1926 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PUBLIC FY 2018 FY 2018 Total Program Expenditures* (in millions) Funding Swaps $6.7 Airport People Mover Light Rail Projects $0.0 $12.8 Bus Projects $14.1 BART SiliconValley Commuter Rail Projects $198.9 (Caltrain, ACE etc.) $16.4 Non-Project (debt service, bond repayment, operating assistance, etc.), $96.4 Program Total: $345.5 *Expenditures were grouped by category. Individual project details are available in the CWC Comprehensive Annual Report. CITIZENS WATCHDOG COMMITTEE ACTIVITIES The CWC appreciates the importance of the role entrusted to us by voters in Santa Clara County to provide oversight for the tax collected under 2000 Measure A and for keeping county residents informed. To that end, the CWC engaged in the following activities: Program Monitoring Compliance Audit Review & Publication The CWC periodically reviewed updates to the 2000 The CWC reviewed the compliance audit for FY 2018 Measure A Transit Improvement Program including and published the results of the independent audit of the project status and costs. FY18 2000 Measure A financial schedules and records. Independent Compliance Audit Conducted Public Hearing The CWC commissioned Macias Gini & O’Connell On May 8, 2019, the CWC conducted a public hearing LLP, an independent certified public accountant firm, to to receive input from the public on the Measure A conduct an audit. The CWC reviewed the compliance Program, its expenditures, the results of the CWC’s audit plan and schedule prior to audit of the Measure A annual independent compliance audit, and on Measure Program financial records. A Program reports for FY 2018. CITIZENS WATCHDOG COMMITTEE MEMBERS Martin Schulter Herman Wadler Respectfully submitted, Aneliza Del Pinal Noel Tebo Aaron Morrow Ray Hashimoto Aboubacar Ndiaye William Hadaya ______________________________ Connie Rogers Matthew Quevedo Martin Schulter, Chairperson Citizens Watchdog Committee SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report ................................................................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule ............................................................................................ 3 - 10 Supplementary Information – Program Summaries ............................................................................. 11 - 30 Supplementary Information – 2000 Measure A Ballot ........................................................................ 31 - 33 Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee 3331 North First Street San Jose, California 95134 We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program (2000 Measure A Program), a fund of VTA, for the year ended June 30, 2018. The financial activity of the 2000 Measure A Program is included in the accompanying Budgetary Comparison Schedule and related notes. Management is responsible for VTA’s compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on VTA’s compliance based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards require that we plan and perform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about VTA’s compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Program, in all material respects. An examination involves performing procedures to obtain evidence about VTA’s compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Program. The nature, timing, and extent of the procedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of the risks of material misstatement of VTA’s compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Program, whether due to fraud or error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination of VTA’s compliance with specified requirements. In our opinion, VTA complied with the aforementioned requirements of the 2000 Measure A Program for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, in all material respects. Our examination was conducted for the purpose of assessing compliance with the 2000 Measure A Program, as reported in the Budgetary Comparison Schedule. The supplementary information is presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the Budgetary Comparison Schedule. The supplementary information has not been subjected to the compliance procedures of the 2000 Measure A Program and, accordingly, we express no opinion on them. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than this specified party. Walnut Creek, CA April 3, 2019 Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP 2121 N. California Boulevard, Suite 750 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 www.mgocpa.com 1 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Budgetary Comparison Schedule (on a Budgetary Basis) For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018 (in thousands) Original Operating Final Operating Variance with Budget Budget Actual Final Budget Revenues: Sales tax receipts$ 215,343 $ 215,343 $ 207,870 $ (7,473) Investment earnings 5,256 5,256 7,379 2,123 Federal subsidy for Build America Bonds 8,750 8,750 8,784 34 Other income 391 391 414 23 Total revenues 229,740 * 229,740 224,447 (5,293) Non-project expenditures: Professional, special and other services 790 790 560 230 Operating assistance to VTA Transit (Note B4) 44,684 44,684 43,133 1,551 Miscellaneous 27 27 25 2 Contributions to other agencies 673 673 195 478 Repayment of debt service to VTA Transit (Note D) 15,596 15,596 14,936 660 Principal payment, bond interest and other bond charges (Note E) 38,638 38,638 37,598 1,040 Total non-project expenditures 100,408 * 100,408 96,447 3,961 Total revenues less non-project expenditures$ 129,332 *$ 129,332 128,000 $ (1,332) Project expenditures (Note B3): Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor (VTA's BART Silicon Valley Program) 198,951 Light Rail Program 12,803 Commuter Rail Program 16,387 Bus Program 14,146 Mineta-San Jose Airport People Mover 11 Swap payments to Congestion Management & Highway Program (Note C) 6,743 Total project expenditures 249,041 Capital contributions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
    Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • BLUE LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    BLUE LINE light rail time schedule & line map Baypointe View In Website Mode The BLUE LINE light rail line (Baypointe) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Baypointe: 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM (2) Virginia: 12:16 AM - 11:33 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest BLUE LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next BLUE LINE light rail arriving. Direction: Baypointe BLUE LINE light rail Time Schedule 17 stops Baypointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:30 AM - 10:20 PM Monday Not Operational Virginia Station West Virginia Street, San Jose Tuesday Not Operational Children's Discovery Museum Station Wednesday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM Convention Center Station Thursday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM 300 Almaden Bl, San Jose Friday 12:29 AM - 11:46 PM San Antonio Station Saturday 12:29 AM - 11:47 PM 200 S 1st St, San Jose Santa Clara Station Fountain Alley, San Jose BLUE LINE light rail Info Saint James Station Direction: Baypointe Stops: 17 Japantown/Ayer Station Trip Duration: 33 min 15 Hawthorne Way, San Jose Line Summary: Virginia Station, Children's Discovery Museum Station, Convention Center Station, San Civic Center Station Antonio Station, Santa Clara Station, Saint James 800 North 1st Street, San Jose Station, Japantown/Ayer Station, Civic Center Station, Gish Station, Metro/Airport Station, Karina Gish Station Court Station, Component Station, Bonaventura North 1st Street, San Jose Station, Orchard Station, River Oaks Station, Tasman Station, Baypointe Station Metro/Airport Station 1740 North First
    [Show full text]
  • VTA FY2006 and FY2007 Adopted Budget
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ADOPTED BIENNIAL BUDGET June 2, 2005 FISCAL YEARS 2006 and 2007 July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2005 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Joe Pirzynski Cindy Chavez Chairperson Vice Chairperson VTA Board of Directors VTA Board of Directors Council Member Vice Mayor Town of Los Gatos City of San Jos e Nora Campos David Casas Dean Chu David Cortese Don Gage Council Member Mayor Mayor Council Member Supervisor City of San Jose City of Los Altos City of Sunnyvale City of San Jose County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors Ron Gonzales Liz Kniss Robert Livengood Jamie Matthews Forrest Williams Mayor Chairperson Council Member Council Member Council Member City of San Jose County of Santa Clara City of Milpitas City of Santa Clara City of San Jose Board of Supervisors BOARD MEMBER ALTERNATES Dennis Kennedy Breene Kerr Pete McHugh Dolly Sandoval Ken Yeager Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Supervisor Council Member Council Member City of Morgan Hill Town of Los Altos Hills County of Santa Clara City of Cupertino City of San Jose Board of Supervisors EX-OFFICIO James Beall, Jr. John McLemore Supervisor, County of Santa Clara Vice Chairperson Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) FISCAL RESOURCES STAFF Susan M. Stark Roger Contreras Jim McCutchen Cont roller Chief Financial Officer Budget Manager Christine Huynh Pauline Man Linda Schwartz Jessica Tran Vannak Uong Budget Depart ment Budget Depart ment Budget Depart ment Budget Depart ment Budget Depart ment Updated as of December 14, 2005 THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ADOPTED BIENNIAL BUDGET ~ FISCAL YEARS 2006 and 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page General Manager’s Budget Message .
    [Show full text]
  • Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful
    Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq..
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose Campus Map Rev2-9 Pg1.Ai
    N San Jose Main Campus MR-3 W E MR-1 McCarthy Ranch S 237 680 . Dr B a 237 lew r Bel ber r. M D c Ln C 24 . nology a 237 ch r ters t r D h Headqua r. Te y y a 23 B Dr. W Z M l r s v 25 e r an u r. Site 5 r D d lg e p t . ke h o r groM mac a y u 880 H r S 21 u r R q a 22 R n ad d c 20 B . h He . Al a y R de r d r ber aW egdi aW D N . r . 1 y Renais sanc a . kw 3 . r e n F P 6 32 31 D L D i 4 5 n r. ta rst e a n n S nt 2 30 m r. o t 7 s A . oi a lderD M p Site 4 28 T a y E d 29 e t a Ta E s 9 11 s i m I B 8 an Site 5.1 V J 10 12 D 680 . r. W Tasm r. a D Center Rd. n K an D Site 2 m H r. as Cisc 15 20 c Z G F Champion Ct. T CYS r. E L E a e D b n 13 16 or 880 P k o m . a B r. r e c a D W y a D r 17 S B D n e r R a a O b M C m nt u W as y Site 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Grading California's Rail Transit Sta on Areas Appendix LEGEND
    ! Grading California's Rail Transit Sta3on Areas Appendix LEGEND: CONTENTS: Group 1 - Residen<al • BART Final Scores • LA Metro Final Scores Group 2 - Mixed • Sacramento RT Final Scores • San Diego MTS Final Scores • San Francisco MUNI Final Scores Group 3 - Employment • Santa Clara VTA Final Scores A+ 95% A 80% A- 75% B+ 70% B 55% B- 50% C+ 45% C 30% C- 25% D+ 20% D 5% D- 2% F below 2% Appendix | www.next10.org/transit-scorecard Next 10 ! BART FINAL SCORES AVERAGE: C Final City Line Sta3on Raw Score Grade San SFO-MILLBRAE Civic Center/UN Plaza BART 90.60 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Montgomery St. BART 88.20 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE 24th St. Mission BART 87.30 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE 16th St. Mission BART 84.30 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Powell St. BART 84.10 A Francisco San SFO-MILLBRAE Embarcadero BART 83.80 A Francisco Oakland FREMONT Lake Merri] BART 77.60 A DUBLIN/PLEASANTON Berkeley Downtown Berkeley BART 74.50 A TO DALY CITY Berkeley RICHMOND Ashby BART 75.30 A- Berkeley RICHMOND North Berkeley BART 74.30 A- San SFO-MILLBRAE Glen Park BART 74.10 A- Francisco Oakland FREMONT Fruitvale BART 73.50 A- Oakland SFO-MILLBRAE 19th St. Oakland BART 72.90 B+ San SFO-MILLBRAE Balboa Park BART 69.80 B+ Francisco 12th St. Oakland City Center Oakland SFO-MILLBRAE 71.70 B BART Contra Pleasant Hill/Contra Costa Costa SFO-MILLBRAE 66.20 B Centre BART Centre Appendix | www.next10.org/transit-scorecard Next 10 ! Oakland PITTSBURG/BAY POINT MacArthur BART 65.70 B Fremont FREMONT Fremont BART 64.20 B El Cerrito RICHMOND El Cerrito Plaza
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara Valley Transportation
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination .................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule .............................................................................................. 3 - 9 Supplementary Information: Program Summaries ............................................................................... 10 - 31 Walnut Creek 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 750 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 925.274.0190 Sacramento Oakland LA/Century City Newport Beach San Diego 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee San Jose, California Seattle INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program (2000 Measure A Program), an activity of VTA, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. The financial activity
    [Show full text]
  • A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’S Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report ................................................................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule ............................................................................................ 3 - 10 Supplementary Information – Program Summaries ............................................................................. 11 - 30 Supplementary Information – 2000 Measure A Ballot ........................................................................ 31 - 33 Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee 3331 North First Street San Jose, California 95134 We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program (2000 Measure A Program), an activity of VTA, for the year ended June 30, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • GREEN LINE Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    GREEN LINE light rail time schedule & line map Old Ironsides - Winchester View In Website Mode The GREEN LINE light rail line (Old Ironsides - Winchester) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Baypointe Station (E): 10:16 PM (2) Civic Center Station (N): 12:36 AM - 11:43 PM (3) Old Ironsides Station (W): 5:59 AM - 10:46 PM (4) San Jose Diridon: 5:27 AM - 11:49 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest GREEN LINE light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next GREEN LINE light rail arriving. Direction: Baypointe Station (E) GREEN LINE light rail Time Schedule 17 stops Baypointe Station (E) Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday Not Operational Diridon Station Tuesday Not Operational San Fernando Station 415 San Fernando St, San Jose Wednesday 10:16 PM Convention Center Station Thursday 10:16 PM 300 Almaden Bl, San Jose Friday 10:16 PM San Antonio Station Saturday Not Operational 200 S 1st St, San Jose Santa Clara Station Fountain Alley, San Jose GREEN LINE light rail Info Saint James Station Direction: Baypointe Station (E) Stops: 17 Japantown/Ayer Station Trip Duration: 34 min 15 Hawthorne Way, San Jose Line Summary: Diridon Station, San Fernando Station, Convention Center Station, San Antonio Civic Center Station Station, Santa Clara Station, Saint James Station, 800 North 1st Street, San Jose Japantown/Ayer Station, Civic Center Station, Gish Station, Metro/Airport Station, Karina Court Station, Gish Station Component Station, Bonaventura Station, Orchard North 1st Street,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix! DRAFT TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN for a New San Francisco 49Ers Stadium in Santa Clara, CA
    Appendix! DRAFT TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN for a New San Francisco 49ers Stadium in Santa Clara, CA DMJM HARRIS I AECOM Draft of July 13, 2009 Transportation Plan for a New San Francisco 49ers Stadium in Santa Clara, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................•..............•.•....•..............•....................•.. 1 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK ......................................... 1 2.1 EXISTING ROADWAY NETWORK ............................................................. 1 2.2 EXISTING TRANSIT NETWORK ............................................................... .4 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........•• 9 3.1 HISTORICAL CANDLESTICK POINT OPERATIONS ................................. 9 3.2 TRIP ORIGINS AND DESTINATIONS ...................................................... 11 3.3 EMPLOYEES ............................................................................................. 13 3.4 OTHER NFL STADIUMS ........................................................................... 14 4.0 STADIUM TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN •...................... 16 4.1 TRANSIT .................................................................................................... 16 4.1.1 TRANSIT SERVICES ............................................................... 16 4.1.2 FACILITIES AND OPERATION ............................................... 19 4.2 MODAL SPLIT ........................................................................................... 24 4.3 PARKING ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’S Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2009 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination .................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule ..............................................................................................3 - 8 Program Summaries...............................................................................................................................9 - 27 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee San Jose, California INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE EXAMINATION We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program (2000 Measure A Program), an activity of VTA, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The financial activity of the 2000 Measure A Program is included in the accompanying Budgetary Comparison Schedule and related notes. Management is responsible
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara Valley Transportation
    SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination and Budgetary Comparison Schedule For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program [A Fund of the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority] For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016 Table of Contents Page(s) Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination .................................................................. 1 Budgetary Comparison Schedule (On a Budgetary Basis) ........................................................................... 2 Notes to Budgetary Comparison Schedule ............................................................................................ 3 - 10 Supplementary Information – Program Summaries ............................................................................. 11 - 30 Supplementary Information – 2000 Measure A Ballot ........................................................................ 31 - 33 Century City Los Angeles Newport Beach Oakland Sacramento San Diego Independent Accountant’s Report on Compliance Examination San Francisco Walnut Creek 2000 Measure A Citizens Watchdog Committee Woodland Hills 3331 North First Street San Jose, California 95134 We have examined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority’s (VTA) compliance with the requirements of the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement
    [Show full text]