DOCSLIB.ORG

A Logical New Taxonomy for the Asian Subfamily Draconinae Based On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Logical New Taxonomy for the Asian Subfamily Draconinae Based On Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology 22:9-59. ISSN 1836-5698 9(Print) Published 1July 2014. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A logical new taxonomy for the Asian subfamily Draconinae based on obvious phylogenetic relationships and morphology of species (Squamata: Sauria: Agamidae: Draconinae). RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: [email protected] Received 10 November 2013, Accepted 1 June 2014, Published 1 July 2014. ABSTRACT A number of recent molecular studies have highlighted divergences between south-east Asian agamid lizards within the Draconinae previously thought to be sufficiently close as to be placed in the same genera. Consolidating recently published studies and further investigations into relevant taxa, incorporating available molecular, morphological and geological evidence some genera as presently recognized are re-arranged to better reflect the relationships of species. For some of these taxa, names are available and as a result of this review they are formally resurrected from synonymy. Where names for taxa don’t exist, the species groups are formally named and defined herein according to the Zoological Code (Ride et al. 1999). Well established genera that are in effect split up include the following: Gonocephalus, Kaup, 1825 is divided into three genera. The nominate genus is also split into five subgenera, all named for the first time except for (Dilophyrus Gray, 1845) and the nominate subgenus. Japalura Gray, 1853 is divided into three genera, one of which is named for the first time. Two genera are further divided into two subgenera. Calotes Daudin, 1802 is divided into three genera, two also divided into subgenera. The taxon originally described as “Calotes andamanensis Boulenger, 1891” is also placed in a new monotypic genus as it also clearly sits ouside the two genera in which it has been recently placed (Calotes and Pseudocalotes Kaup, 1827). Ceratophora Gray, 1835, is divided in three, with the two most divergent taxa, C. aspera Günther, 1864 and C. karu Pethiyagoda and Manamendra-Arachchi, 1998 each placed in a new monotypic genus. The remaining Ceratophora are split into two obvious subgenera. Bronchocela Kaup, 1827 is divided into two subgenera. The taxon currently known as Bronchocela cristatella Kuhl, 1820 from the island of Halmahera, Indonesia is formally described as a new species. Other potential new species are identified. Phoxophrys Hubrecht, 1881 is divided into three subgenera, one formally named for the first time. Aphaniotis Peters, 1864 is subdivided into two subgenera as is Ptyctolaemus Peters, 1864. Salea Gray, 1845 is divided into two subgenera for which a names are already available. Draco Linnaeus, 1758 is herein conservatively divided nine ways into subgenera of which five are formally named for the first time. It is likely that other taxonomists may treat these divisions as full genera. Furthermore, Draconinae taxonomy and nomenclature at the level between subfamily and genus is tidied up. The result is the formal erection of ten tribes and the addition six subtribes formally defined and named. As a result of this scientific reorganisation of the subfamily, this paper presents a list of all recognized Draconinae species in correct tribes, subtribes, genera and subgenera. Keywords: Taxonomy; nomenclature; genera; Gonocephalus; Japalura; Cophotis; Calotes; Ceratophora; Diploderma; Aphaniotis; Phoxophrys; Bronchocela; Lophocalotes; Dendragama; Otocryptis; Ptyctolaemus; Mictopholis; Salea; Sitana; Otocryptis; Pseudocalotes; Paracalotes; Draco; Dilophyrus; Oriotiaris; Pelturagonia; Lyriocephalus; Coryphophylax; Ptyctolaemus; Mantheyus; Acanthosaura; new genera; Daraninagama; Doongagama; Maxhoseragama; Crottyagama; Skrijelus; Notacalotes; Pethiyagodaus; Manamendraarachchius; subgenera; Dracontoides; Rhacodracon; Pterosaurus; new subgenera; Honlamagama; Mantheysaurus; Denzeragama; Eksteinagama; Jamesschulteus; Rubercalotes; Ghatscalotes; Laccadivecalotes; Ceyloncalotes; Tamilnaducalotes; Freudcalotes; Khasicalotes; Amboncalotes; Ferebronchocela; Olorenshawagama; Proboscisagama; Mindatagama; Macguiredraco; Philippinedraco; Engannodraco; Somniadraco; Spottydraco; new species; Harradineus. new tribes; Dracoiini; Maxhoseragamiini; Crottyagamiini; Daraninagamaiini; Pethiyagodaiini; Japaluraiini; Lophocalotesiini; Phoxophryiini; Mantheyiini; Dendragamaiini; new subtribes; Maxhoseragamiina; Sitanaiina; Acanthosauriina; Saleaiina; Pethiyagodaiina; Hoser 2014 - Australasian Journal of Herpetology 22:9-59. Doongagamaiina. Available online at www.herp.net Copyright- Kotabi Publishing - All rights reserved 10 Australasian Journal of Herpetology INTRODUCTION subgenus is also tentative, noting mixed results emerging from A number of recent molecular studies have highlighted deep cited molecular and morphological studies. divergences between relatively well-known south-east Asian Ceratophora Gray 1835, is divided in three, with the divergent agamid lizards. These lizards were thought to be sufficiently taxa, C. aspera Günther, 1864 and C. karu Pethiyagoda and close until now as to be placed in the same genera. While Manamendra-Arachchi, 1998 each placed in a new monotypic general affinities have not been disputed, it has become clear genus. The remaining Ceratophora is split into two obvious that some species placed within given genera should be subgenera. removed and placed elsewhere. This situation for some species Bronchocela Kaup, 1827 is divided into two subgenera, the new is not just a case of being within the same genus group, but one named Ferebronchocela subgen. nov... slightly divergent, but more often than not because the relevant The taxon currently referred to as Bronchocela cristatella Kuhl, species are not remotely related to the type species of the 1820 from the island of Halmahera, Indonesia is formally genus they have been placed in (e.g. Gonocephalus Kaup, 1825 described herein as a new and closely related species. as presently defined by most authors or Japalura Gray, 1853 as presently defined by most authors). Phoxophrys Hubrecht, 1881 is divided into three subgenera, one formally named for the first time. In a limited number of cases, genera with widely divergent species in need of a break up have also been identified (e.g. Aphaniotis Peters, 1864 is subdivided into two subgenera as is Ceratophora Gray 1835 or Calotes Daudin, 1802). Ptyctolaemus Peters, 1864. Following on from a number of molecular studies that have Salea Gray, 1845 is divided into two subgenera for which a indicated splits of genera are warranted on a molecular basis, I name is already available. audited all genera within the southern and south-east Asian Draco Linnaeus, 1758 is herein divided nine ways into agamid subfamily Draconinae to determine which needed to be subgenera of which five are formally named for the first time. divided. Furthermore, the taxonomy and the nomenclature at the level The material and methods of the audit involved a thorough between subfamily and genus is tidied up for the Draconinae. review of the published literature with a view to seeing if there The result is the formal erection of ten tribes with some of these were significant morphological differences between species as in turn divided into subtribes (6 subtribes being named). indicated by recently available molecular data. Added to this Unlike authors such as Wallach et al. (2009), Baig et al. 2012., was direct inspection of several hundred live and dead Bates et al. (2013), Reynolds et al. (2013a, 2013b and 2014), specimens and photos of the relevant taxa with known and Hedges et al. (2014) and Thomas et al. (2014), I do not feel the accurate locality data. need to dishonestly rehash other people’s previously published Genera, in the context of how they are recognized by most data and present it as new to justify the taxonomic decisions zoologists in 2013, as indicated by Pyron et al. (2013) found herein or falsely claim the scientific basis underpinning these worthy of formal division included the following: Gonocephalus, decisions is new. Kaup, 1825; Japalura Gray, 1853; Calotes Daudin, 1802; Unlike these authors just cited and others in the group known as Ceratophora Gray 1835; Bronchocela Kaup, 1827 and Draco the Wüster gang, I do not find a need to step outside of the Linnaeus, 1758. Zoological Code (Ride et al. 1999) to rename previously named For some of these taxa, and new genera to be defined, names taxa based on the research of others. are available and they are formally resurrected herein. In this and all previous papers published by myself, I have Where names for these taxa are not available, they are formally always respected and used originally proposed names that have named herein according to the Zoological Code (Ride et al. been named in a code compliant way, no matter how little 1999). Invariably these new genera, or at times herein more evidence was provided as justification for the original conservatively placed subgenera are readily defined using the descriptions (and in some cases this was none!). significant and generally well-known morphological differences Where names have been properly proposed, even if unused to between relevant species-level taxa. date, they are used herein if appropriate and in total compliance Well established genera that are in effect split up, include the with the established rules of zoology (Ride et al. 1999). In terms following: of newly defined taxa
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying Versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology Following the Evolution of an Innovation
    vol. 195, no. 2 the american naturalist february 2020 E-Article Gliding Dragons and Flying Squirrels: Diversifying versus Stabilizing Selection on Morphology following the Evolution of an Innovation Terry J. Ord,1,* Joan Garcia-Porta,1,† Marina Querejeta,2,‡ and David C. Collar3 1. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre and the School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales 2052, Australia; 2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC–Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37–49, Barcelona 08003, Spain; 3. Department of Organismal and Environmental Biology, Christopher Newport University, Newport News, Virginia 23606 Submitted August 1, 2018; Accepted July 16, 2019; Electronically published December 17, 2019 Online enhancements: supplemental material. Dryad data: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.t7g227h. fi abstract: Evolutionary innovations and ecological competition are eral de nitions of what represents an innovation have been factors often cited as drivers of adaptive diversification. Yet many offered (reviewed by Rabosky 2017), this classical descrip- innovations result in stabilizing rather than diversifying selection on tion arguably remains the most useful (Galis 2001; Stroud morphology, and morphological disparity among coexisting species and Losos 2016; Rabosky 2017). Hypothesized innovations can reflect competitive exclusion (species sorting) rather than sympat- have drawn considerable attention among ecologists and ric adaptive divergence (character displacement). We studied the in- evolutionary biologists because they can expand the range novation of gliding in dragons (Agamidae) and squirrels (Sciuridae) of ecological niches occupied within communities. In do- and its effect on subsequent body size diversification. We found that gliding either had no impact (squirrels) or resulted in strong stabilizing ing so, innovations are thought to be important engines of selection on body size (dragons).
    [Show full text]
  • ONEP V09.Pdf
    Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern OEPP BIODIVERSITY SERIES volume nine OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING MINISTRY OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT 60/1 SOI PIBULWATTANA VII, RAMA VI RD., BANGKOK 10400 THAILAND TEL. (662) 2797180, 2714232, 2797186-9 FAX. (662) 2713226 Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 First published : September 2000 by Office of Environmental Policy and Planning (OEPP), Thailand. ISBN : 974–87704–3–5 This publication is financially supported by OEPP and may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non–profit purposes without special permission from OEPP, providing that acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes. Citation : Nabhitabhata J., Chan ard T., Chuaynkern Y. 2000. Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Bangkok, Thailand. Authors : Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan–ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern National Science Museum Available from : Biological Resources Section Natural Resources and Environmental Management Division Office of Environmental Policy and Planning Ministry of Science Technology and Environment 60/1 Rama VI Rd. Bangkok 10400 THAILAND Tel. (662) 271–3251, 279–7180, 271–4232–8 279–7186–9 ext 226, 227 Facsimile (662) 279–8088, 271–3251 Designed & Printed :Integrated Promotion Technology Co., Ltd. Tel. (662) 585–2076, 586–0837, 913–7761–2 Facsimile (662) 913–7763 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Keanekaragaman Jenis Squamata Di Kawasan Wisata Air Terjun Roro Kuning Kecamatan Loceret Kabupaten Nganjuk the Diversity of Spec
    Simki-Techsain Vol. 01 No. 01 Tahun 2017 ISSN : XXXX-XXXX KEANEKARAGAMAN JENIS SQUAMATA DI KAWASAN WISATA AIR TERJUN RORO KUNING KECAMATAN LOCERET KABUPATEN NGANJUK THE DIVERSITY OF SPECIES SQUAMATA IN THE TOURIST AREA WATERFALL RORO KUNING KECAMATAN LOCERET KABUPATEN NGANJUK Oleh: SEPTI WULANDARI 13.1.01.06.0034 Dibimbing oleh : Dr. Sulistiono, M.Si. Tisa Rizkika N. A., S.Pd., M.Sc. PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN (FKIP) UNIVERSITAS NUSANTARA PGRI KEDIRI 2017 Simki-Techsain Vol. 01 No. 01 Tahun 2017 ISSN : XXXX-XXXX Artikel Skripsi Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri SURAT PERNYATAAN ARTIKEL SKRIPSI TAHUN 2017 Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini: Nama Lengkap :Septi Wulandari NPM :13.1.01.06.0034 Telepun/HP :0857 8529 3572 Alamat Surel (Email) :[email protected] Judul Artikel :Keanekaragaman Jenis Squamata di Kawasan Wisata Air Terjun Roro Kuning Kecamatan Loceret Kabupaten Nganjuk Fakultas – Program Studi :FKIP-Pendidikan Biologi Nama Perguruan Tinggi :Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri Alamat Perguruan Tinggi :Jl. KH. Achmad DahlanNo. 76, Mojoroto, Kota Kediri Dengan ini menyatakan bahwa : a. artikel yang saya tulis merupakan karya saya pribadi (bersama tim penulis) dan bebas plagiarisme; b. artikel telah diteliti dan disetujui untuk diterbitkan oleh Dosen Pembimbing I dan II. Demikian surat pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sesungguhnya. Apabila di kemudian hari ditemukan ketidaksesuaian data dengan pernyataan ini dan atau ada tuntutan dari pihak lain, saya bersedia bertanggungjawab dan diproses sesuai dengan ketentuan yang berlaku. Mengetahui Kediri, 7 Agustus 2017 Pembimbing I Pembimbing II Penulis Dr. Sulistiono, M.Si. Tisa Rizkika N. A., S.Pd., M.Sc. Septi Wulandari NIDN.
    [Show full text]
  • Squamate Reptiles Challenge Paradigms of Genomic Repeat Element Evolution Set by Birds and Mammals
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05279-1 OPEN Squamate reptiles challenge paradigms of genomic repeat element evolution set by birds and mammals Giulia I.M. Pasquesi1, Richard H. Adams1, Daren C. Card 1, Drew R. Schield1, Andrew B. Corbin1, Blair W. Perry1, Jacobo Reyes-Velasco1,2, Robert P. Ruggiero2, Michael W. Vandewege3, Jonathan A. Shortt4 & Todd A. Castoe1 1234567890():,; Broad paradigms of vertebrate genomic repeat element evolution have been largely shaped by analyses of mammalian and avian genomes. Here, based on analyses of genomes sequenced from over 60 squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes), we show that patterns of genomic repeat landscape evolution in squamates challenge such paradigms. Despite low variance in genome size, squamate genomes exhibit surprisingly high variation among spe- cies in abundance (ca. 25–73% of the genome) and composition of identifiable repeat ele- ments. We also demonstrate that snake genomes have experienced microsatellite seeding by transposable elements at a scale unparalleled among eukaryotes, leading to some snake genomes containing the highest microsatellite content of any known eukaryote. Our analyses of transposable element evolution across squamates also suggest that lineage-specific var- iation in mechanisms of transposable element activity and silencing, rather than variation in species-specific demography, may play a dominant role in driving variation in repeat element landscapes across squamate phylogeny. 1 Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, 501S. Nedderman Drive, Arlington, TX 76019, USA. 2 Department of Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Saadiyat Island, United Arab Emirates. 3 Department of Biology, Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • NHBSS 061 1G Hikida Fieldg
    Book Review N$7+IST. BULL. S,$0 SOC. 61(1): 41–51, 2015 A Field Guide to the Reptiles of Thailand by Tanya Chan-ard, John W. K. Parr and Jarujin Nabhitabhata. Oxford University Press, New York, 2015. 344 pp. paper. ISBN: 9780199736492. 7KDLUHSWLOHVZHUHÀUVWH[WHQVLYHO\VWXGLHGE\WZRJUHDWKHUSHWRORJLVWV0DOFROP$UWKXU 6PLWKDQG(GZDUG+DUULVRQ7D\ORU7KHLUFRQWULEXWLRQVZHUHSXEOLVKHGDV6MITH (1931, 1935, 1943) and TAYLOR 5HFHQWO\RWKHUERRNVDERXWUHSWLOHVDQGDPSKLELDQV LQ7KDLODQGZHUHSXEOLVKHG HJ&HAN-ARD ET AL., 1999: COX ET AL DVZHOODVPDQ\ SDSHUV+RZHYHUWKHVHERRNVZHUHWD[RQRPLFVWXGLHVDQGQRWJXLGHVIRURUGLQDU\SHRSOH7ZR DGGLWLRQDOÀHOGJXLGHERRNVRQUHSWLOHVRUDPSKLELDQVDQGUHSWLOHVKDYHDOVREHHQSXEOLVKHG 0ANTHEY & GROSSMANN, 1997; DAS EXWWKHVHERRNVFRYHURQO\DSDUWRIWKHIDXQD The book under review is very well prepared and will help us know Thai reptiles better. 2QHRIWKHDXWKRUV-DUXMLQ1DEKLWDEKDWDZDVP\ROGIULHQGIRUPHUO\WKH'LUHFWRURI1DWXUDO +LVWRU\0XVHXPWKH1DWLRQDO6FLHQFH0XVHXP7KDLODQG+HZDVDQH[FHOOHQWQDWXUDOLVW DQGKDGH[WHQVLYHNQRZOHGJHDERXW7KDLDQLPDOVHVSHFLDOO\DPSKLELDQVDQGUHSWLOHV,Q ZHYLVLWHG.KDR6RL'DR:LOGOLIH6DQFWXDU\WRVXUYH\KHUSHWRIDXQD+HDGYLVHGXV WRGLJTXLFNO\DURXQGWKHUH:HFROOHFWHGIRXUVSHFLPHQVRIDibamusZKLFKZHGHVFULEHG DVDQHZVSHFLHVDibamus somsaki +ONDA ET AL 1RZ,DPYHU\JODGWRNQRZWKDW WKLVERRNZDVSXEOLVKHGE\KLPDQGKLVFROOHDJXHV8QIRUWXQDWHO\KHSDVVHGDZD\LQ +LVXQWLPHO\GHDWKPD\KDYHGHOD\HGWKHSXEOLFDWLRQRIWKLVERRN7KHERRNLQFOXGHVQHDUO\ DOOQDWLYHUHSWLOHV PRUHWKDQVSHFLHV LQ7KDLODQGDQGPRVWSLFWXUHVZHUHGUDZQZLWK H[FHOOHQWGHWDLO,WLVDYHU\JRRGÀHOGJXLGHIRULGHQWLÀFDWLRQRI7KDLUHSWLOHVIRUVWXGHQWV
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    HAMADRYAD Vol. 27. No. 2. August, 2003 Date of issue: 31 August, 2003 ISSN 0972-205X CONTENTS T. -M. LEONG,L.L.GRISMER &MUMPUNI. Preliminary checklists of the herpetofauna of the Anambas and Natuna Islands (South China Sea) ..................................................165–174 T.-M. LEONG & C-F. LIM. The tadpole of Rana miopus Boulenger, 1918 from Peninsular Malaysia ...............175–178 N. D. RATHNAYAKE,N.D.HERATH,K.K.HEWAMATHES &S.JAYALATH. The thermal behaviour, diurnal activity pattern and body temperature of Varanus salvator in central Sri Lanka .........................179–184 B. TRIPATHY,B.PANDAV &R.C.PANIGRAHY. Hatching success and orientation in Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, 1829) at Rushikulya Rookery, Orissa, India ......................................185–192 L. QUYET &T.ZIEGLER. First record of the Chinese crocodile lizard from outside of China: report on a population of Shinisaurus crocodilurus Ahl, 1930 from north-eastern Vietnam ..................193–199 O. S. G. PAUWELS,V.MAMONEKENE,P.DUMONT,W.R.BRANCH,M.BURGER &S.LAVOUÉ. Diet records for Crocodylus cataphractus (Reptilia: Crocodylidae) at Lake Divangui, Ogooué-Maritime Province, south-western Gabon......................................................200–204 A. M. BAUER. On the status of the name Oligodon taeniolatus (Jerdon, 1853) and its long-ignored senior synonym and secondary homonym, Oligodon taeniolatus (Daudin, 1803) ........................205–213 W. P. MCCORD,O.S.G.PAUWELS,R.BOUR,F.CHÉROT,J.IVERSON,P.C.H.PRITCHARD,K.THIRAKHUPT, W. KITIMASAK &T.BUNDHITWONGRUT. Chitra burmanica sensu Jaruthanin, 2002 (Testudines: Trionychidae): an unavailable name ............................................................214–216 V. GIRI,A.M.BAUER &N.CHATURVEDI. Notes on the distribution, natural history and variation of Hemidactylus giganteus Stoliczka, 1871 ................................................217–221 V. WALLACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoology ABSTRACT
    Research Paper Volume : 3 | Issue : 9 | September 2014 • ISSN No 2277 - 8179 New record of Roux’s Forest Lizard Calotes Zoology rouxii (Duméril & Bibron, 1837) (Reptilia: KEYWORDS : Calotes rouxii, range exten- Squamata: Agamidae) from Sandur and sion, distribution update, Karnataka Gulbarga, Karnataka, India with a note on its known distribution Biodiversity Research and Conservation Society, 303 Orchid, Sri Sai Nagar Colony, Aditya Srinivasulu Kanajiguda, Secunderabad, Telangana 500 015, India. Natural History Museum and Wildlife Biology and Taxonomy Lab, Department of Zoology, * C. Srinivasulu University College of Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 007, India. *Corresponding Author ABSTRACT Roux’s Forest Lizard Calotes rouxii (Duméril & Bibron, 1837) is chiefly a forest-dwelling draconine agamid that is widely distributed in the Western Ghats and occasionally reported from the Eastern Ghats and other localities in the central peninsular India. We report the presence of this species for the first time from Sandur forests in Bellary district, Karnataka based on a voucher specimen and from Gulbarga township based on sighting record. A detailed distribution map showing localities from where the species is known is also provided. The genus Calotes Daudin, 1802, belonging to the draconian fam- ized by the presence of a dewlap in males, two slender spines on ily Agamidae (Reptilia) is native to South Asia, South-East Asia either side of the head and a dark groove before the shoulder. and Southern China. It is represented
    [Show full text]
  • F3999f15-C572-46Ad-Bbbe
    THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE ENDANGERED SPECIES (IMPORT AND EXPORT) ACT (CHAPTER 92A) (Original Enactment: Act 5 of 2006) REVISED EDITION 2008 (1st January 2008) Prepared and Published by THE LAW REVISION COMMISSION UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS ACT (CHAPTER 275) Informal Consolidation – version in force from 22/6/2021 CHAPTER 92A 2008 Ed. Endangered Species (Import and Export) Act ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Appointment of Director-General and authorised officers PART II CONTROL OF IMPORT, EXPORT, ETC., OF SCHEDULED SPECIES 4. Restriction on import, export, etc., of scheduled species 5. Control of scheduled species in transit 6. Defence to offence under section 4 or 5 7. Issue of permit 8. Cancellation of permit PART III ENFORCEMENT POWERS AND PROCEEDINGS 9. Power of inspection 10. Power to investigate and require information 11. Power of entry, search and seizure 12. Powers ancillary to inspections and searches 13. Power to require scheduled species to be marked, etc. 14. Power of arrest 15. Forfeiture 16. Obstruction 17. Penalty for false declarations, etc. 18. General penalty 19. Abetment of offences 20. Offences by bodies corporate, etc. 1 Informal Consolidation – version in force from 22/6/2021 Endangered Species (Import and 2008 Ed. Export) CAP. 92A 2 PART IV MISCELLANEOUS Section 21. Advisory Committee 22. Fees, etc., payable to Board 23. Board not liable for damage caused to goods or property as result of search, etc. 24. Jurisdiction of court, etc. 25. Composition of offences 26. Exemption 27. Service of documents 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Challenges Regarding Species Status Assessments in Biogeographically Complex Regions: Examples from Overexploited Reptiles of Indonesia KYLE J
    Conservation challenges regarding species status assessments in biogeographically complex regions: examples from overexploited reptiles of Indonesia KYLE J. SHANEY, ELIJAH WOSTL, AMIR HAMIDY, NIA KURNIAWAN MICHAEL B. HARVEY and ERIC N. SMITH TABLE S1 Individual specimens used in taxonomic evaluation of Pseudocalotes tympanistriga, with their province of origin, latitude and longitude, museum ID numbers, and GenBank accession numbers. Museum ID GenBank Species Province Coordinates numbers accession Bronchocela cristatella Lampung -5.36079, 104.63215 UTA R 62895 KT180148 Bronchocela jubata Lampung -5.54653, 105.04678 UTA R 62896 KT180152 B. jubata Lampung -5.5525, 105.18384 UTA R 62897 KT180151 B. jubata Lampung -5.57861, 105.22708 UTA R 62898 KT180150 B. jubata Lampung -5.57861, 105.22708 UTA R 62899 KT180146 Calotes versicolor Jawa Barat -6.49597, 106.85198 UTA R 62861 KT180149 C. versicolor* NC009683.1 Gonocephalus sp. Lampung -5.2787, 104.56198 UTA R 60571 KT180144 Pseudocalotes cybelidermus Sumatra Selatan -4.90149, 104.13401 UTA R 60551 KT180139 P. cybelidermus Sumatra Selatan -4.90711, 104.1348 UTA R 60549 KT180140 Pseudocalotes guttalineatus Lampung -5.28105, 104.56183 UTA R 60540 KT180141 P. guttalineatus Sumatra Selatan -4.90681, 104.13457 UTA R 60501 KT180142 Pseudocalotes rhammanotus Lampung -4.9394, 103.85292 MZB 10804 KT180147 Pseudocalotes species 4 Sumatra Barat -2.04294, 101.31129 MZB 13295 KT211019 Pseudocalotes tympanistriga Jawa Barat -6.74181, 107.0061 UTA R 60544 KT180143 P. tympanistriga Jawa Barat -6.74181, 107.0061 UTA R 60547 KT180145 Pogona vitticeps* AB166795.1 *Entry to GenBank by previous authors TABLE S2 Reptile species currently believed to occur Java and Sumatra, Indonesia, with IUCN Red List status, and certainty of occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 834/2004
    L 127/40EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.4.2004 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 834/2004 of 28 April 2004 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, definition of ‘specimens’ given by Article 2(t) of Regu- lation (EC) No 338/97; the annotation regarding Aloe Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European spp. needs to make an explicit reference to the species Community, listed in Annex A; and the annotation to Guaiacum spp. Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 needs to be changed in order to designate the parts and December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and derivatives decided upon at the 12th Conference. flora by regulating trade therein (1), and in particular Article 19(3) thereof, (5) The Scientific Review Group has established, on the basis of the criteria set out in Article 3(4)(a) of Regu- Whereas: lation (EC) No 338/97, that certain species must be with- drawn from the list of animals whose importation into (1) Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 lists animal and the Community should, on account of the volume plant species in respect of which trade is restricted or involved, be monitored, whilst certain other species controlled. Those lists incorporate the lists set out in the must be added to that list. annexes to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, hereinafter (6) Regulation (EC) No 338/97 should therefore be ‘the CITES Convention’.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar National Red List Training and Assessment Workshop Forest Research Institute, Yezin, Naypyitaw 23-27 July 2018
    Myanmar National Red List Training and Assessment Workshop Forest Research Institute, Yezin, Naypyitaw 23-27 July 2018 1 Background The Myanmar National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2020 includes Target 12.3 “By 2020, a National Red List of selected taxa has been produced” and Actions 12.3.1 “Conduct Red List assessments for key taxa, with a particular focus on endemic species” and 12.3.2 “Hold training workshops to build capacity on application of the Red List categories and criteria”. In July 2017, in partnership with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation’s (MONREC’s) Nature and Wildlife Conservation Division (NWCD), WCS Myanmar, and WWF Myanmar, IUCN organized a 5-day Red List Assessor training workshop at the Forest Research Institute (FRI), Yezin, near Naypyitaw. 30 participants attended, representing organizations including the Myanmar Forest Department, WCS, WWF, FFI, Instituto Oikos, Myanmar Floriculturalist Association, Taunggyi University, Yangon University, Mandalay University, and Myitkyinar University. In addition to building national capacity in use of the Red List Categories and Criteria, this event was intended to initiate the process of developing a Myanmar National Red List. It was followed by the formal establishment of five National Red List Working Groups – focusing on mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians, plants, and aquatic species, approved by the MONREC Minister. In July 2018, IUCN continued to support the development of a Myanmar National Red List by facilitating a second Red List workshop at FRI, Naypyitaw, again in partnership with NWCD, WCS Myanmar, and WWF Myanmar. This event consisted of three days of Red List Assessor training for all members of the Myanmar National Red List Working Groups (23-25 July), followed by two days of conducting national-level assessments of reptile species with the Myanmar National Red List Reptiles and Amphibians Working Group (26-27 July).
    [Show full text]